I've just read that to really understand how English works you need to be bilingual. If you can't compare English with another language you don't understand that languages can work in different ways to express the same things. Really every child should be bilingual. The easiest way to become bilingual for children who speak English at home would be to teach Esperanto which deserves to be much better known.
@@jancovanderwesthuizen8070 Which languages do you consider useful? In a way all languages are useful, but it depends on what you want to do. If you travel to a foreign country then it is useful to know the language of that country. Esperanto is a very useful language in many ways. It allowed me to get to know a big variety of very interesting people from different cultures.
@@Srifem I think they miss out on many things if they speak only English, but of course they can communicate with heaps of people even if they don't understand how grammar can work in very different ways in different languages.
Not too late to start learning a language, but choose one that is easier than most languages, like Esperanto, so that it is not too time-consuming, especially if you are not young any more.
Why does the pallet of the internal voice change to something seen not as inferior, but perhaps prior, in the person who never had an intentionally monolingual English upbringing within their American public education? They never saw their monolingual internal voice as poor repression, but natural. So that they can't help but sympathize with the xenophobic who yaps less progressive, less transcendental languages with a mocking blurb of sounds that dumbfounds oneself as oneself being bigot, when in fact they always before poetry appeared inside of them spiritually, always was very multicultural-ly friendly without identity politics for onself as passively un-signified, now signified?
