Back in the late 1980's I had a computer program called "Chessmaster 2000". It had this game in its library along with Anderssen's immortal. Thank you for reminding me of my earliest days of playing chess. Your channel helped revive my interest. PS back in those days it was actually possible to beat a computer at chess.
Suren, thank you for sharing this beauty of chess! ❤ Just for a suggestion, at 5:45 you could have analized also the line started with the black knight taking the rook on d8 (so Qd7+!, etc), because it's maybe a not so obvious line to see 👍 I'm a fan of your channel, congrats! 👏👏
The position at 4:04 is quite complicated. Stockfish analysis at Chess.com gives ...Bd4 and ...Qh3 as equal, and ...Rg4 is just barely in white's favor.
The compromised defense [chesstempo.com/gamedb/opening/884 or www.365chess.com/eco/C52_Evans_gambit_compromised_defence] is playable for Black, although it's given as "bagels" (0.00) by stockfish, and probably by other strong chess engines. It's not easy to play for either side. Even the great Johannes Zukertort played it incorrectly, though his play was often better than that of his opponent. Reuben Fine played it quite badly in a loss to Bobby Fischer in 17 moves.
Although I've analyzed the evergreen game before, I just analyzed it for the first time with stockfish 9. It's sort of a shame that there were several blunders in the game. Some were mentioned in this video but others were not. There were also a few minor errors and inaccuracies. The final combination was sparkling but the game as a whole was not. For example, 15. ... Qf5?? should have been a losing move. Then later, 17. Nf6?? let Dufresne back in the game. Then 19. ... Qxf3?? threw the game away again. Sure it's easy to criticize the players using stockfish, but it was a casual game and there was nothing on the line.
Then Qd7+(!), followed by Bf5 (double check), entering again in a mating line similar to the lines showed on the video. But I agree with you that this line should also have been analysed as the other lines 👍
Adolf Anderssen is simply superb fantastic game even Morphy would have said bravo take a bow Anderssen well if Anderssen was so good how and more importantly why did he lose to Morphy he got crushed by Morphy any answers anyone suren sir can you answer that question
I’m the last person to say this, but wow. The entire format/thumbnail is agadmator. Look at the two thumbnails. Board on right, green background on left with the player, and finally, the same exact position with the same things highlighted. It’s just too similar.... (even the titles are around 1 word off)
Then Qd7+(!), followed by Bf5 (double check), entering again in a mating line similar to the lines showed on the video. But I agree with you that this line should also have been analysed as the other lines 👍
They're similar channels on youtube that both have their own style, maybe he just doesn't enjoy Agad's style and dislikes the way he commentates over a game. This can really quickly turn into mutual disrespect, so I wouldn't recommend Suren to ever face Agad.
Psclly That’s fair but I really cannot believe as I’ve seen suren comment on agadmators channel with nice comments and he’s always responded. Plus people comment it on agads channel asking and he responds saying he’d be fine for a game.
