The real issue will always be developers not optimizing their game. There should be no reason a $500+ GPU shouldn't be able to run any game at atleast 4k 60 fps nowadays. Developers are getting lazy and are becoming over-reliant on GPUs to do their job for them. Sad.
I have a regular 4070 and I play every game completely fine. Dlss is there for a reason. Yea in native not every graphically demanding game is gonna get higher fps. But turn on dlss and you’re almost always between 90-140fps even on the most demanding newer titles. Dlss quality looks even better than native at times. I don’t think there’s a lot of mid range cards that are gonna crank up your fps on demanding titles at native resolution. The regular 4070 can be found for like 500 bucks now.
Why youre hiding the vram of the gpu? Whats the point of all this if youre not mentioning the vram capacity of the product? I remember your first video, youre the one mentioning the vram of all the rtx gpu to be release and its not enough to the future games releasing. I learned it from you, but now, no information or anything about the vram like its kinda invalidate the whole video
You can literally see how much VRAM is being used in the video for each game... Do the math yourself if its enough VRAM for 2025 or not. Shouldn't be difficult.
You don't need to play every new game on ultra settings. If you play on medium, you will only use 4GB-5GB VRAM, with little difference... This is a mid range card. Get a 4090 if you want ultra settings 1440p/4K.
@@xPhantomxify seems like you struggling to comprehend and cant read properly. This is a gpu specification review and you have to say to the viewer whats the detail of the product youre reviewing. In this case his missing one of the most important detail of the product. Come to think of this, if youre looking a gpu to buy with your hard earned money, you too will look for the specification which is the memory capacity. And it doesnt really matter if i want to play ultra settings or not. Thats not what im pointing here, please read carefully
@@michaeltownley2089 He covered the 4070 multiple times and showed how much VRAM it has. You act like this is his first time reviewing the 4070. 5 second to google how much VRAM 4070 has. The 4000 series cards have been reviewed a lot of times now, these cards are old news now.
In this game locking FPS with Riva Tuna helps. I was plating it with a controller on a system with 4060 8GB 115W laptop GPU. Using controller is recommended
Altough I am not an AMD fan, but in this kind of price range you are better off going with the 7800xt. If you are willing to up the budget a bit, get the 4070 super no doubt
Funny enough i just bought myself a new System and the jump from a 4070 to a 4070 Gigabyte Windforce, so a good model, was only 60 Bucks. For overall 20% increase in performance that was a damn good deal.
It's kinda a shame that the RTX 4070 is just an ok GPU. I actually thought back when this card first released that the performance per dollar was "Meh" The 4070 Super is a more proper midrange offering. Thanks iVadim for the informative video. Cheers!
It was expected. 4070 is very close to 3080 10GB performance-wise, but it has less memory bandwidth. So it usually performs a bit slower. Back in 2023 the true 1440p GPU was 4070 Ti. In 2024 it is 4070 Super. These two cards are quite a bit faster than vanilla 4070. Thus they have that extra power to run the most demanding games at 1440p with small compromises.
@@joke4617 no its 500 for the msrp priced model which lacks many features . If you wana get a decent one than you gota pay 550-600 ...and even that 500-600 euros are not mid range . When does high end start , at 1 k ? and enthusiast levels start at 1.5? FOR ONLY A GPU ?
That Helblade tech demo doesnt really need high fps, I would(I wouldn't play it really there is not much of gameplay in it) play that walking sim at locked 30fps and at high and native res.
Not really. I'd say it's fine for now. Imho, future-proofing is a bad idea anyway. Just buy what makes sense now and then upgrade as needed. You can always sell your old PC hardware to recover some money.
Hard to do for every benchmark video but, people need to use optimized/mixed setting to get the most out of any GPU. Going all max or all low it's never the best.
@@D71Gaming couldnt agree more, like you cant even tell the difference between high and ultra, so why not play with the settings? Its really fun to play with settings and see what they do but if you dont wanna do that there are probably people who already made it so you can just check it out. With doing some adjustments you can get the same FPS of a like 4070Ti (Ultra) while you have a 4070. So you can simply make your card a ''Ti''
Very good video 👌👌👌 , this type of analysis shows how well nvidia midrange card are aging ; 4070 aged like a milk that too before the arrival of next gen😅 ; No country for old man , more you buy more you save .
in ghost of tsushima i do 1440p dlaa frame gen on same place same settings 110/130 fps (dlss +frame gen 120/140). 80/90 is very low result (my frame gen 3.7.10) nvidia app o expirience overlay is off .same results with fsr 3 frame generation. maybe something wrong on your dlss frame generation i dont know .same thing in horizon110/120 fps is very strange frame gen get only 10 frames .usually frame gen get 40% of your fps (not always)
🤣...very high settings? Regular 4070, not super?...on the regular 4070 at very high settings you are not getting 130 FPS native + FG. I don't even think the super is even getting that.
@@RX7800XTBenchmarks very high regular 4070 see that video I linked at 3:50 min he do 123 avg and he recording.Anyway, you don't need to believe it, I played the whole game like this at 110/130 avg dlaa 1440 very hign frame gen on
@@Livebasura69 you didn't link any video, you linked the time of this current video, where he's getting in the 80's, no where near 120 FPS. You also linked hellblade not ghost of Tsushima. It's not about not believing you, but if you claim something then you have to show it, because other channels are getting the same FPS as in this video, like zwormz for example.
@@RX7800XTBenchmarks if you search in the comments of the zwormz video I wrote the same thing to him (second comment 1 month ago) . i link first reply on my comment (this video)
Not even close! A 1440p card performing 40 fps on raw power, that's not a good sign. However if you took the time to tinker with the settings a bit yes you can squeeze more frames but not many going to do that anyway because the GPU is expensive, right? Right? It should run at max settings to be worth purchasing. This is very unhealthy mindset. That's only to the fact that the game forces the Ray Tracing. If it was toggleable, it would have been called a 1440p card. But this is not really it. Maybe 1080p card even? If the price were right, I don't mind getting this for 1080p gaming, only because of that 12GB you know. Framerates are more important. Sure 8GB would be enough but we are not testing easy to run titles here but instead put the GPU to the real worst case scenarios with the latest and greatest titles. However this is not the worst that I have seen. Many other titles can't even run 1080p on a 1440p card compared to these titles the fact that they were horrendously broken. This is the proof why you should not be worried much if Radeon can't handle the Ray Tracing well because even a 4070 can't without needing all the bells and whistles to make it playable and enjoyable. With the recent FSR 3.1 now, Radeon need to make it decent for productivity use as well and then it going to be a happy switch. That one reason is why people still buying the green you know including myself. 🤷🏻♀️
😂...errm i think ill keep my comments to myself on this one. Hellblade 2 is literally the very beginning of the next gen graphics of games. We are only in 2024. More games coming out are going to be even more demanding.
Eve worse. It can't handle the most demanding games at 1080p native either🙂 Here's the video - ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-JFiS8eoCr88.html
