The Most GARBAGE Pokémon Designs 

Yeah, it doesn't look anything like a cat to me. I see it as taking the "bunny" in "dust bunny" literally.

Could you share a link to that video? I tried searching for "Bad Pokémon Designs Don't Exist" on GatorEX's channel page, but I couldn't find it.

Does muk, electrode or golem have any better tho? I don't dislike the object like pokémon, I like many of them actually, just that I do not see logic behind saying garbodor or vanilluxe is any worse than muk or electrode. Also golem (not named that in original language) is not that much of a golem, regis or golurk are much more like actual golem than golem is.

@@turkoositerapsidi That's Kanto favoritism for ya

@@faniskouklas Yeah, I get why it is, its from nostalgia, koffing is my favourite pokémon but only a little bit more than durant and cosmoem. But I still can recognize that original pokémon are not designed better than the new ones, some of the original ones are not the best designs at all.

Like magnezone?

@@turkoositerapsidi Exactly! There is room for plants, animals, robots, and even simple concepts.

Garbodor is also one of my favorite Pokémon (if my username didn't make that obvious), and I completely agree with you about variety being what makes Pokémon special. While there's no shortage of badass Pokémon that I love, some of my absolute favorites tend to be the ones which look the goofiest. Sadly, those kinds of Pokémon are usually some of the least popular among fans, which is just a shame. Weird Pokémon deserve love too!

@@abbybraun7019 Yeah. Even the first Pokémon games had those.

Fr, great hairstyle. 10/10

Great way of building on Trubbish’s little ears

Also, it would be cool if, you encounter a hoard of Trubbish in the while, there is a chance you can encounter a Bannette since it is literally discarded doll out for revenge.

I know they can sometimes be holding Nuggets, which is pretty cool. But imagine more of a Garbodor Gacha 🤔

@@Red-jt6uu in a way, in Kalos, you can find Branette in trash can, the same spot where you can find Trubbish and Garbodor. So in a way, they are connected

A surprise to be sure, but a welcome one.

Me when I see garbage: "It's just like me fr"

Yeah bc those same people think gen 1 is a flawless masterpiece just bc it came first

@@legonerd0666I hate people like that.

Examples: - Ekans is Snake backwards - Arbok is Kobra backwards - Rotom is Motor backwards Any others? Updated Edits: - Muk is Kum backwards - Eevee is Eevee backwards - Rellor is Roller backwards - Rabsca is Scarab but as an anagram - Girafarig is spelt Girafarig backwards - Farigiraf is Girafarig but as an anagram - Seel is LITERALLY Seal (but no A) (Gen 1 really does have a lot of uncreative pokemon names?)

I don't think that's a great argument. I'm an older player, but my favorite designs come from later generations and not Gen 1. I don't love a lot of Gen 1 designs, because they're just animals for the most part. However, in the first generation of a new game, I wouldn't expect a lot of off-the-wall designs. And Pokémon was built to mimic the real world zoology we see. I don't _love_ Voltorb and the Grimer lines for that reason, but at least they're simple designs that are easy on the eyes. I don't even _like_ the Trubbish line, because: 1. It looks unappealing. It's just a trash bag with scattered, intentionally unappealing colors with little coordination. Klefki and even Vanillish match within their own color schemes. And at least Muk is one solid color that meshes. 2. It's not an animal. At least, all of basic designs look like animals which makes sense, because Pokémon is pretty much just animal/monster taming. 3. It doesn't make sense. Why would trash get up and walk around? Electricity has a power source and can be considered computerized. Toxic sludge can be considered some mutation or fusion with bacteria. Trubbish is just trash bag that got uppity, and I don't know why (and don't say "it's just a video game," because PokéDex entries often give reasons for how Pokémon came to be. Ghostly manifestations, mutations, fusions, etc. Trubbish has nothing like that in its entries. One says "chemical reaction," but a chemical reaction that creates an autonomous _life?_ The other just says it was born from a bag stuffed with trash. If you're gonna go the fantasy route, it kinda needs a ghost or spirit or lab-created backstory. 4. It's meant to be a substitute _for_ Muk, so it's not originally uninspired. Sawk and Throh have the same issue as being replacements for the original Hitmons. Pure Poison type. One evolution. It just looks worse. And sure, beauty is in the eye of the cliché. But if you ask the designer if it was supposed to look "good," they'd probably say no. In fact, it's canon. In SwSh, Oleana has a team of Pokémon considered traditionally beautiful or alluring. Froslass. Milotic. Salazzle. Tsareena. Garbador is her ace to show her poor upbringing but also to _contrast against the _*_beauty_*_ of the rest of the team._ Anyone can like any Pokémon they want. But let's stop pretending that the Trubbish line wasn't made to be trash: literally and figuratively. And if it was made to be unappealing and it was an uninspired design, we shouldn't be surprised it gets put down.

@@gamewriteeye769Rellor is Roller backwards. Rabsca’s an anagram of scarab. Or are we doing early generations?

lol, perfect way to put it!

Garboder is sick it has a gen 1-2 feel to it, and I always thought it was from that era didn’t expect it to be from Gen 5, but I love Garboder.

pugs are disgusting tho

@@a.x.x8184 You know you're right, it does have that Gen 2 charm of Ariados or Sunflora

@@grantdaily9662 yep and Snubble Vibes

If I had a nickel for every time a generational gimmick only included special treatment for one Gen 5 mon... ...then I could have had 3, but Z-Moves straight up said "f*ck Gens 2 through 6."

I can dream

Mega garbodor for the glory of the trashy trash. The Garbodors channel on this platform would love it.

Is garbodor that little tho? 🙂

Nice. I had that with koffing. But garbodor is nice pokémon, I do not get the hate it gets. Muk is in my opinion a bit lazy design, but it is still fine pokémon. Garbodor is not lazy, it is an interesting idea for a pokémon and how it is finished as a creature.

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-3GKykZ5zmqU.htmlsi=5OZYKCNRyZsFgEaO

Oleana speech bubble

Weezing is million times more interesting design than muk! Koffings and Weezing are awesome. Balloon creature filled with toxic substances, muk is just a pile of sludge with eyes. That has been seen in million games already.

Have you seen the channel called The Garbodors?

Pokémon Concierge gave them all some love

Pokémon Black was my second Pokémon game (June 2012), just a year and a half after Pokémon SoulSilver (December 2010).

Apparently! 🤷‍♂️

I still have to watch the rest of the Sun and Moon anime lol 😅

if you want some irony klink's whole idea was by ken sugomori, who ALSO made a bunch of gen 1 pokemon designs let that sink in