The Most INNOVATIVE Aircraft That Can Change Everything 

Sorry, but the only aircraft manufacturer replacing boeing is Airbus.

Whrn Kenian flight fell down Boing stated "that safety" is an option, which they haven't opted!

And updated, not using yokes. Like the modern planes,: sidesticks...

Regards from Sochi, Russia ! For information: The MC-21 is a Russian medium-haul narrow-body passenger aircraft. The MC-21 family program is being developed by Yakovlev Corporation, together with the Yakovlev Aviation Design Bureau which is part of it. Perhaps in the future (after the start of serial production of aircraft) the MС-21 will be named - Yakovlev Yak-242 .

@@nntflow7058 And which aircraft manufacturer will replace Airbus!? Have you heard the news that airlines have started massively canceling the A220, not only orders, but selling planes that have not even been in service for a month, because that plane is, in terms of quality and safety, to say the least... shit!

It actually EM-ES (магистральный самолет, magistralnyi samoliot - mainline aircraft), not EM-SEE

@@lucem.glorifico Let me switch to my cyrilic keyboard - МС = MS in my latin keyboard.

@@AleksaAdzic yes, but as you can see this aircraft is always called "Em-See 21" instead of correct "Em-Es 21" on this video.

Yes, it is true. But Em-See is so widely used in the latin alphabet World, so UAC (the manufacturer) decided: OK, let it be Em-See if you want. So Em-Es in Russian and Em-See in English is OK both. It is not incorrect or wrong.

​@@KVentz ok, let it be "Mainline airCraft - 21" 😆

civil aircraft market is highly dependent on politics. I would expect that its usage wont be any significant outside Russia itself and may be its closest partners, but would also depend on their ability to reach high production volumes

You have no idea. All BRICS countries are doing business with Russia. They definitely will be interested in the Russian airliner.

problem with Russian equipment after sale support. If Russia estabilished that then lot of countries will buy it. Or Russia should go into joint ventures.@@RayVideo

@@RayVideo Please tell why the Brics countries have to buy it? Can it fly to the western world airports?

@@Hkchinese888 countries in the West are changing politics from left to right. Sanctions backfired big time and the west will understand that it is time to say goodbye to USA. USA been profiting from the sanctions. It will take time but the West will wake up from the (woke) and USA hegemony. Besides that, there are more and more BRICS countries to fly to. BRICS knows that the west is stupid to not follow them. Follow the Money: petrodollar coming to an end.

Not in this lifetime lol!

The engines need a full overhaul every 3600 hours... Kind of military jets grade thing. Airlines will love it. See how much time Cubana's TU204 and IL96 spent on overhauls lately.

163- 211- passengers. The maximum flight range reaches 6400 km, 21300 kg is the maximum commercial load. Cruising speed is 870 km/h. PD-14 engine - Life before the first repair of the pump block is 20,000 hours, before the first repair of all ACS units-14 - 40 000 ch. The operating time for an unavoidable in-flight engine shutdown is > 200,000 hours. The reliability of the aircraft departure, related to the readiness of the engine > 99.96%. Engine noise is 15-20 dB less than the requirement of Chapter 4 of the ICAO standard. Reduction of the level of nitrogen oxide NOx emissions relative to the ICAO standards of 2008 > 30%.

163- 211- passengers. The maximum flight range reaches 6400 km, 21300 kg is the maximum commercial load. Cruising speed is 870 km/h. PD-14 engine - Life before the first repair of the pump block is 20,000 hours, before the first repair of all ACS units-14 - 40 000 ch. The operating time for an unavoidable in-flight engine shutdown is > 200,000 hours. The reliability of the aircraft departure, related to the readiness of the engine > 99.96%. Engine noise is 15-20 dB less than the requirement of Chapter 4 of the ICAO standard. Reduction of the level of nitrogen oxide NOx emissions relative to the ICAO standards of 2008 > 30%.

Характеристики[115] МС-21-200 МС-21-310 МС-21-400 Длина самолёта (м) 33,8 42,3 46,7 Размах крыла (м) 35,9 35,9 36,8 Высота самолёта (м) 11,5 11,5 12,7 Ширина салона (м) 3,81 3,81 3,81 Ширина фюзеляжа (м) 4,06 4,06 4,06 Максимальная взлётная масса (кг) 72 560 85 000 87 230 Максимальная посадочная масса (кг) 63 100 73 500 ? Максимальная коммерческая нагрузка (кг) 18 900 21 300 ? Максимальная заправка топливом (кг) 20 400 20 400 ? Максимальная дальность полёта в двухклассной компоновке, км 6400 5100 6000 Число пассажирских мест, типовая 2-классная компоновка кресел 132 (C12+Y120) 163 (C16+Y147) 196 (C20+Y176) Типовая 1-классная компоновка кресел[116][117] 153 (32″) 181 (32″) 210 (32″) Предельно плотная компоновка кресел 165 (29″) 211 (29-28″) 230 (29-28″)

LMAO

You'll get hired for your comedy statements mate.

LOL 😂 😂 the lied these russians tell themself.

This is a nice plane, especially for Russia, but dont mistake that for them being superior or even a contemporary to America's abilities. The US leads the planet in basically every important industry by a mile.

@@PenskePC17 They don't lead civil aviation. AIRBUS has surpassed them

And fall many times

You sound like some American grandpa... 😅

You are right! Your planes have proven to the whole world that they can fall apart in the air)))

When has Russia ever produced a quality aviation product? Name a few please.

@@bayouflier6641 Sarmat!

@@yermekjalgasbayev8343 Sarmat is an unproven weapon system, and let's hope it stays that way. But I was talking about aircraft.

@@bayouflier6641 su 35, mi 28, ka 52 etc

​@@bayouflier6641Sarmat's effectiveness is not in question; it's merely that you haven't experienced its capabilities-something we should all hope remains the case. After the USSR's dissolution, Russia's aviation sector saw a decline but has since been making significant strides in a complex and sophisticated field. Since 2011, the Sukhoi Superjet 100 has been successfully operating in the commercial sector, , exemplifying the resurgence of Russian aviation. I encourage you to educate yourself on Russia's aviation history and its current advancements, including the Ilyushin and Antonov aircraft, known for producing some of the world's largest and respected cargo planes, alongside other notable entities like Beriev, Aviakor, Irkutsk Aviation, Sukhoi, Tupolev, Kuznetsov Design, Yakovlev, UAC, and more. Your lack of knowledge and predisposition to negativity reflect poorly on you, not on the reality of Russia's aerospace achievements. The country continues to build on its legacy as a pioneer in space exploration and aviation, holding numerous records and innovations. Russian rocket engines, known for their unparalleled power, are used globally, including in Western spacecraft. Moreover, Russia's leadership in hypersonic missile technology is undisputed, with capabilities the West has yet to match. Disparaging the Russian aerospace and aviation industries without acknowledging these facts only highlights ignorance. Instead of harboring resentment, perhaps take a moment to appreciate the advancements and learn something new. And maybe, for now, steer clear of certain other western aerospace products (Boeing MAX for example) to ensure you're around to see how global aerospace dynamics continue to evolve while witnessing the western demise as it unfolds infront of us as we speak.

The comac c-919 doesn't offer any innovations compared to airbus or Boeing. Its listed price is not competitive too.

especially since the comac is so heavily relied on western parts, especially its avionics by rockwell collins. All of which Russia does not have access to.

Yokes are much easier for me, sides ticks aren’t sensitive enough and I love to constantly move something.

A220?

Russia has the market of former USSR, Africa, India, Latin America

From any really free country

No, south Asia, Africa, Middle East, Latin America. Places where real economic growth is changing people's live allowing them to fly in record numbers. You must watch MS media.

Эти самолёты будут под санкциями.

MS-21-300 (western engines) and MS-21-310 (russian engines) have different production dates. MS-21-300 was supposed to be produced since 2022, but now it won't be. MS-21-310 should be produced since 2024-2025. There is less than a year left before the release of the first MS-21. There are already about 20 airplanes on the production line. The hundredth MS-21 will be released in 2028. The thousandth MS-21 will be released in 2040.

It is not like Russian companies have the same access to financing as companies from rich countries have. They are getting things done on a shoestring funding.

Already producing

that is the funniest things I have ever heard and so stupid.... he he he...

Only independent from USA countries can buy it

Europe is dying. No one cares about them. World economic growth is happening in countries friendly to Russia, not Europe or the US....❤❤❤❤❤

I don't think many passengers have much interest in the type of aircraft they fly on..

too many airlines were burned by the SSJ-100. No spare parts! Looks nice, but it will never fly outside Russia.

I doubt if everything is in order and even if spare parts are made available at every potential destination the likes of the US and EU will issue the required certifications for it's operation in the US and EU. Remember what happened with the newly built Nord Stream pipeline? For no real reason except for political reasons the Germans (at the urging of the US) refused to certify that NS pipelineand intentionally delayed and dragged their feet for months. It was later damaged by explosives planted & detonated by 'persons unknown' 😏

Мы помним самый новый Боинг, который несколько раз падал вместе со всеми пассажирами и экипажем.

Russians are learning very quickly

250 rubles.

Aeroflot group - 50 planes, Ilyushin finance - 50, GTLK/VEB Leasing - 30, SberLeasing - 20, Utair - 10, Irareo - 10. The delivery of the first 6 aircrafts for Aeroflot group (Rossiya Airlines) is planned on the end of 2024 depending on certification of MC-21-310 RUS modification.

Who told you this absurd?

Western sanctions was a major setback for the project.

Since the truth has come to the surface, the Russians can't even give away their military junk.

Hate to burst yer bubble, but that was what the Concorde was as well. A faster tube, but still a tube. And quite a narrow one, come to that.

@@bomcabedal If you look at concorde, it's not actually a tube shape.

@@nntflow7058 Yes it is. You need to check your vision.

@@nntflow7058 It really is a tube. Looked like one from the inside, too. It's more integrated with its wing than other airplanes, but still... a tube.

@@bomcabedal No, it's an elongated diamond shape kiddo. Stop yapping if you don't know anything about the aviation industry. You don't even know what tube looks like apparently.

Superjet new now is completely localized too

Superjet is not "brilliant", as any other jet, but it is successful.

What is propaganda to you?

Lol certification is a propaganda by itself as Europe hate russia and has nothing to do with the plane, dont worry it will be delivered

i am sure you are brainwashed by western propaganda

Don't be ridiculous. It's chips taken from a microwave. Meanwhile the controls are fashioned out of shovels.

@zahrans ...and mass-production will be carried out by drunken bears

Russian Shovels are crushing NATO and the US.

Because of Iron curtain? And this time it was built not by Russians. ;)

Because western countries dose not like we to hear about

The west wants your to believe the sanctions sent russia back to the stone age, all it is doing is harming the west for europe its energy expenses, for america its eroding at the USD being the reserve currency. From our inflation rate, how much money they put into circulation along with playing games is making our currency riskier for any independent nation to trust

Ничего смешнее не читал.

Misliš?

and how long does it take to plane this Airbus 220 etc. ? western brainwashing is not got for you, think about this...

Do you really believe that all the World is the Western World? What arrogance...

@@KVentz we have no reason to buy russian planes as we are doing much better with the likes of Airbus. Western avionics, western engines. The fact that before the war even russia used western planes and used western avionics says alot.

@@TomNyon It was not because western avionics was better. Tt's because it was cheaper and faster to buy already developed and globally certified avionics instead of making own from the scratch. Now there are no options. OK, not a problem, Russians are making own avionics, western companies lost Russian market forever.

@@KVentz I doubt boeing or airbus care about the Russian market, especially since they have their property. If you think Russia loved its own airplanes more why did aeroflot, rossiya and s7 for example have a a near western only fleet if local was cheaper anyway? Its not that i dont think they can i just think it wont be on par with current western technology.

@@TomNyon >I doubt boeing or airbus care Boeing and Airbus lost billions. They sales market, design centers. Of course you didn't know that they had large design centers in Russia and Russian engineers took part in the creation of all modern A and B aircrafts. So they care. >If you think Russia loved its own airplanes I did not say that. >why did aeroflot, rossiya and s7 for example have a a near western only fleet Because there were no Russian planes. SSJ-100 was the first modern aircraft, but it is a regional one, smaller than the most popular medium-haul planes like A320 and 737. Airlines dedicated to regional flights have SSJ-100: Rossiya, Azimut (they have SSJ-100 only fleet), Yamal, Red Wings and so on.

It’s a new plane. How many do you need?

I don't know how many of them were produced, but I recently saw this plane at the airport when I went on vacation.It's a pity I flew on the A320 and not on the MC21

One and half

5 MC-21-300 (with PW engines) used for tests, 3 MC-21-310 (with PD-14 engines) used for tests too. More 18 in production.

There are a few problems. The PD-14 is not ready yet for commercial use. In comparison to the PW engines it is less efficient. The active stick steering system comes from France. The composite material comes from the USA. The PW engines are from the USA. All that is under sanction by now. The MC-21 cannot compete with the A320 and the C919. Therefore, it will not be a product that can be sold outside of Russia. This makes it virtually dead.

the A321XLR is the same level as this, not better.

Ukrainians now do not have any qualification in aviation. They have lost soviet basis.

And flies 100mph

“You ain’t no engineer”

composites

Soviet and Russian aircrafts can not be a copy, just because nobody gave a documentation or a piece for disassembling. What technology in aviation was stolen by Russia? And why USA has researched soviet MIG planes? Russia already has created engine PD-14, and is working on other engines. SSJ is not a catastrophe. This was the good jet, the only mistake was the supply of parts. Now it is reworked and almost 100% domestic SSJ New.

Ridiculous CIA propaganda. U robot!😂

"Jealous"? An-225 (that's how it correctly named) was built by Soviets.

That's if it had to compete at its own market. Russia, on the other hand, is a captive market.

As the first flight test engine mechanic for the MC-21-300 Russian Airliner. I agree

The 737 max is the most common plane I have flown on and look am alive. What if YOU made an aircraft? Before you could make a move it would break on ground.

it added delays as components from unfriendly countries had to be replaced, but now it's claimed that this process has been completed

Of course. Just as you change your tyre. As far as it flies better than the MAX....

Why it should be a dead project?

@@KVentz Like Sukhoi Superjet 100.

@@nntflow7058 200+ SSJ-100 was made, most of them are flying in Russia perfectly. There could be even more of them, but they have to many foreign components. So Russia had to replace all of them including engines: construct and certify. First localised SSJ-100 have its first flight in august 2023. Last thing is PD-8 engines, they will be certified this year.

@@KVentz Actually, there are only 141 of them to be exact. in Russia. But they are using western components, not just the engines. Currently there are 0 all Russian made SS100 flying around in the air anywhere.

@@nntflow7058 There are no all Russian made SS100 flying because all Russian made SS100 project was start in 2022. And first flight already was last year.

And so what?

@@KVentz do you know any aviation standards or norms?

@@Ljet600 I'm not just know the abbreviations. I even know what do they mean. No Russian planes have or will have EASA or FAA in next decade or even more. And so what?

@@KVentz , The problem is that Russian aircraft have no chance on the international market because they do not meet international standards. Russian standards are much lower than Western standards. The MS21 passenger evacuation test is a case in point. This is not what EASA or FAA requires, it is kindergarten. Would you want to fly such an aircraft? I wouldn't.

@@Ljet600 Russian standards are not lower than Western standards. This is a fake. SSJ-100 and Tu-204 already had EASA and FAA certificates till 2022. And MC-21 could have it but will never have because of Western politics only, not because of lower standards. Yes, none of Russian aircrafts today and in the future have a chance on Western market. Like Russian airlines don't have a chance to fly to Western countries in the next decades. Not a problem. The World is large. It's not only US and EU.

А по культуре, РОССИЯ впереди планеты

In the end, Russia will prevail against all odds

well cause they can't order anything else. So they go with whats available.

lol!

Could be indeed. But the funny thing is that US and European aviation companies are still doing business with Russia while Governements are selling to us the idea that Russia is Evil. How fucking ironic is that???

you are literally watching them do it, lmao

Yes, but not as good.

This changes very quickly. There are local AutoCAD substitutions in Russia, nanoCAD and Compass for example. Tools and chips from China.

@@KVentz That's the problem, it's a substitute, not the real thing. Same goes for their engines and avionics. It's a substitute. Substitute is not gonna be better than the real thing.

You have missed last 3 years. Russia has already reworked the plane for domestic parts, including engines, avionics, flight controls, and more.

Все пропустил, их много собрано и они уже несколько лет летают

Yes, you miss. 8 has been assembled. 18 in production in manufacturing facility. Test flight started long ago.

2024 here...how many have crashed so far.....?!@@KVentz

Ok thx, I also read it up on Wikipedia now, first flight in 2017 and commercial operation should start in 2025

@@raptox24 Yes, they had to redesign the aircraft in 2022 to replace all western components. Initially MC-21 should be with P&W engines, it had wings made from imported carbon and all western equipment.

LOL RUssia can't even keep their own fighter jets in the air without cobbling parts from old planes. Apart from the dozen other reasons apart from supply chain and stolen tech, it's a russian plane that's never been sold before. Good luck with that one, you're buying confidence not just a plane and no amount of propaganda can fake that.

And they did it long before 2022. This was not because of the "Ukraine invasion", this was just... because they want it and they are able to.

If russia hates the west soo much, why would they want to use any western parts or technology. I don't get it.

Don't be silly. Even with the P&W engine it was far behind the 737 max. Just remember....everyone who bought the Sukhoi Superjet ended up returning them because they were USELESS at providing spares. It's the same for the Mc21. They reckon they can make 20 a YEAR...when Airbus make that in 10 days and Boeing in 15 days. You are totally DREAMING.

@@nathd1748 They deleted my previous comment when I said the same thing 😂 😂

Then don't fly Airbus, fly 737 MAX instead. :)

Russia had to develop its own composite materials for this plane since sanctions cut access to Western ones, same with the engines and many other parts. It took time, but serial production is starting up and almost all parts are Russian made now. Western airlines most certainly won`t get this plane - for political reasons and most of all the production is not that big and all built planes will go to domestic airlines for quite a while.

The systems no longer available due to US sanctions can’t be magically built overnight in Russia. The fix would likely be go without. You don’t need WIFI etc.

There is not only western market available on Earth

@@user-zo5hd4sn7u a lot of the components used in these modern air transports are single sourced. Meaning that there is one company controlling the production of the component. A counterfeit or black market part might fit but if you use this hardware I wish you lots of luck, you’ll need it. The Chinese and Russian aircraft designs incorporated many western components throughout.

I smell jealousy 😂

@@antwainebarkley9765 Jealousy? The question is the usual Russian hype "we're the best" videos full of falsehoods. If Russia has advanced avionics why does the "brand new and very advanced" iteration of the IL96 has a cockpit with avionics similar to the 60's IL62, that even needs 3 in the cockpit? And yes that can be seen clearly on the official IL96 video just a few months old. Can Russia engineers do good things? Yes. But the sad fact is that they're decades behind the western companies in civil aviation.

@@jgnclvgmng5408 IL-96 is the old soviet plane, started from 1988 MS-21 is better than all of civil aviation of the whole west.

In the end, Russia will overcome this challenge

why would we need western jet engines?

These planes are already flying with russian engines and avionics. And Russia is not fascist, it is anti-fascist.

Yes, it flights

First flight was in 2017.