Тёмный

The Mysteries of Watergate 

Richard Nixon Foundation
Подписаться 187 тыс.
Просмотров 159 тыс.
50% 1

May 2010: Geoff Shepard, former Associate Director of the White House Domestic Counsel, and former Deputy of President Nixon's legal defense raises questions about John Dean and the special prosecutor's case against the administration.
The Richard Nixon Presidential Library and Museum
Situated on nine rolling acres in Yorba Linda, California, the Richard Nixon Presidential Library & Museum offers visitors an insider’s glimpse into the events, people and world that shaped, and were shaped by, the 37th President.
Get information on visiting the Library and Museum at
www.nixonfound...
Learn more about President Nixon's legacy at www.nixonfound...
Save the date to host your event or wedding on our beautiful grounds at www.nixonfound...
Engage with us elsewhere online
/ nixonfoundation
/ nixonfoundation
/ nixonfoundation

Опубликовано:

 

8 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 257   
@GeorgetteBu
@GeorgetteBu 2 года назад
The ONLY person who got no recognition for the major part they played in the Watergate break in is the Black Man who discovered that there was something wrong and called the Police. He is not mentioned What-So-Ever. His name was Frank Wills.
@BomChickyBowWow
@BomChickyBowWow 2 года назад
Lol! Ma’am, we all know Forrest Gump who discovered the burglars and alerted the authorities. Do your research.
@George-ni5ic
@George-ni5ic 2 года назад
He was featured in the movie, All The President’s Men. Frank Wills played himself. I’m not passing judgment on whether this is commensurate with his contribution but wanted to pass this on. Cheers.
@deanbritt9131
@deanbritt9131 Год назад
@@George-ni5ic I learn something new every day thank you
@jayhenderson2683
@jayhenderson2683 Год назад
The other person is Forrest Gump who called the desk to report the flashlights in the office. lol
@JT-rx1eo
@JT-rx1eo Год назад
Well as, Bob Woodward wrote about Frank Wills himself, he has led a dissapointing life, and reads the bible backwards in search of hidden messages.
@nyworker
@nyworker 2 года назад
In those days they actually broke into offices, opened filing cabinets, photographed documents and passed films of those records to people that they met in prearranged locations. How the internet has made the world "different".
@mikehiggins946
@mikehiggins946 Год назад
Why didn't the Watergate plumbers have the little cameras like the Hogan's heroes guys had way back in the early 1940's? Seems like they had enough money.
@mikemorris7247
@mikemorris7247 8 дней назад
To me the greatest mystery was what was on those 18 minutes of tape that were erased. Whatever it was had to have been so explosive Nixon was willing to resign.
@green856w
@green856w Год назад
Ten minutes to introduce the speaker! Wasting time that could have been well used by the speaker.
@brianarbenz7206
@brianarbenz7206 2 года назад
Just wondering - if someone breaks into the Richard Nixon Library will the Gerald Ford Library pardon them?
@mattheffner6831
@mattheffner6831 2 года назад
Yes
@UfoDan100
@UfoDan100 2 года назад
As long as they do not disturb what really Richard and B.B. may or may not have done while ''golfing'' !
@JT-rx1eo
@JT-rx1eo Год назад
No, since it would likely be an Antifa operative doing that break-in, a CNN reporter would stand in front the Nixon library and report that the break-in was by and large a peaceful entry.
@oughtter
@oughtter 6 дней назад
@@UfoDan100Heehee.
@flagsabbath6483
@flagsabbath6483 2 года назад
Nick Bryant just released a great book about Nixon and watergate
@Keranu
@Keranu 6 месяцев назад
Nick Bryant, the Franklin Scandal author?
@davecollins3710
@davecollins3710 3 года назад
A foundation named for Nixon. Incredible.
@MFK1967
@MFK1967 Год назад
If any of this were true, why wouldn’t Nixon have revealed it?
@blue04mx53
@blue04mx53 Год назад
I also find the theory that states, 'if he was running the cover up he would have said so on the tape'. Somewhat problematic. Because he knew everything he said was being recorded. So it's unlikely, even in an unguarded moment that he would incriminate himself.
@jaredschmidt8013
@jaredschmidt8013 6 месяцев назад
“The CIA has 6 ways to Sunday for getting back at you if you come for them.” ~ Sen. Chuck Schumer
@morenofranco9235
@morenofranco9235 2 года назад
Four out of Ten for the camera operator. While Shepard is pointing at something off-screen, the camera stays focused on Shepard - INSTEAD OF CUTTING to what Shepard is pointing AT. Yet, still a great presentation. I have followed Watergate since it happened. Shows how old I am.
@rollerhater
@rollerhater 2 года назад
“Which version do you believe?” Not your version, that’s for certain.
@nyworker
@nyworker 2 года назад
He's right about calling the Earvin Committee a political trial. It was on TV every day and hopelessly polarized the country The sad legacy of Watergate was the polarization of the country on every issue through the press fed court of public opinion which has paralyzed much of our politics.
@brianarbenz7206
@brianarbenz7206 2 года назад
You're turning the criminals into the victims. People are still making excuses so they don't have make Nixon and the right wingers in his administration take responsibility for their actions
@carterjackson8033
@carterjackson8033 Год назад
Just about everything related to a president is political. Especially a crime. You can blame Nixon for any polarization. I think the scandal was not as polarizing as Shepard suggests though. Republicans ended up confronting Nixon and getting him to resign.
@Jasper7182009
@Jasper7182009 11 месяцев назад
That’s not how I remember it. No one took it as a political trial. The Senate committee was investigating 1972 campaign practices involved with the Watergate break-in and cover up - and you didn’t see any grandstanding or any political shenanigans from the committee and especially not from the media coverage. And if you want to talk about polarization, you have to point right to conservative Republicans who went after political power to destroy Democrats because the crazy conservatives wanted retribution for Nixon resigning.
@DavidJ-iz8wl
@DavidJ-iz8wl 3 года назад
Despite all of the conspiratorial crap, John Dean does rub me the wrong way. Gives me an opportunist vibe. However, that doesn’t make Nixon innocent
@summertime104
@summertime104 2 года назад
Well Shepard explained that it was not the same degree of involvement in the cover-up as Americans were led to believe. He suggested Nixon was justified in rescuing his political career, or the office of the President or whatever he called that when Nixon said in the Frost interviews that he had no criminal intent. John Dean was a total liar and traitor, and was ethically unscrupulous as identified by his former employer who fired him. So it was odd but not unlike F-Biden who hires incompetent criminal uncredentialled types to run his administration who then go on to ruin America. I guess that is a thing in the Fed Govt.
@karlhaase6931
@karlhaase6931 Год назад
Read "silent coup"..
@PigeonPlucker
@PigeonPlucker 4 года назад
Lots of comments from people who clearly have next to no understanding of what Watergate was beyond what they saw on the TV. I've read a LOT about this subject and you only really have 2 legitimate accusations you could make against Nixon. 1) He created the circumstances which allowed people to act irresponsibly and without proper command 2) He attempted to cover up Watergate, but considered it a political containment rather than criminal. That was an error of judgment.
@josephmccormack6910
@josephmccormack6910 4 года назад
That's crap. Nixon controlled a criminal conspiracy from inside the White House. Political containment.....? .TOTAL BS!!!!!!
@PigeonPlucker
@PigeonPlucker 4 года назад
@@josephmccormack6910 Nope, it's called facts. And while I'm open to the prospect, I seriously doubt you've read (give or take) 20 different books on the Nixon presidency and watergate. PS - Watching 'All the President's Men' doesn't count.
@josephmccormack6910
@josephmccormack6910 4 года назад
Yes... I have. You are afraid of the truth. Trying to reinvent history Is weak and dangerous to our democracy. You ignore documented history and are oblivious to truth. READ HISTORY.....DON'T TRY TO MANIPULATE IT.
@josephmccormack6910
@josephmccormack6910 4 года назад
Where was your fiction 46 years ago? Where was your defense then?. You're trying to rewrite history. The Senate just was asleep? Start reading history. Suddenly...Nixon didn't do it? LAUGHABLE! Stop watching fox news. And Sandy Hook didn't happen either right?
@josephmccormack6910
@josephmccormack6910 4 года назад
Apparently...reinventing the truth is a mission for you. Despite the insults...I will ask .....what about the Brookings Institute...? Folly... didn't happen? More important....Pentagon Papers? Nixon tried to silence and undermine freedom of the press...and lost. Read John Ehrlichman book "Witness to Power". He states that he never authorized the Fielding break in......but he did. Your info seems hollow but sadly hand picked by you. If Haldeman knew....and Ehrlichman knew...or was there a rogue government operating? Your info is biased and false. You have to go by the facts...but your info is innuendo and hearsay. There is testimony from the House and Senate hearings which you ignore. Please show me one (1) source. That proves Nixon didn't control e erything and then maybe...we will take you seriously. Not your right wing rumors but actual testimony and fact.
@kalishakta
@kalishakta Год назад
The Moorer-Radford Affair.
@MRVISTA-wz7vj
@MRVISTA-wz7vj 29 дней назад
2 suggestions for the first 2 speakers. Drink more water before you go up and speak. The constant throat clearing is annoying. Also, 11 minutes before the speaker is way too long. Let's go🎉🎉🎉🎉
@goirish2816
@goirish2816 5 лет назад
This is like civil war reenactors wearing three piece suits🤣🤣🤣
@kalishakta
@kalishakta Год назад
Carmine Bellino once took a swing at Jimmy Hoffa after a particularly contentious McClellan Committee hearing.
@attsealevel
@attsealevel 2 года назад
One of Nixon/KIssinger's greatest failures was the 1974 China trade agreement (where he gave away the farm). It set the stage for all future US/China trade deals + WTO access (and there was no going back). So yes, maybe Nixon/Kissinger had a few joint successes, but lack of incite and smart China strategy would eventually wipe out American manufacturing.
@Dbusdriver71
@Dbusdriver71 2 года назад
Nixon is responsible for this? Its not NAFTA or any of the agreements that then Pres Bill Clinton, George W. Bush or Barack Obama 'negotiated'? Its all Nixon? Really?
@brianarbenz7206
@brianarbenz7206 2 года назад
No, Mark, it wasn't China that wiped out U.S. manufacturing. It was merger mania and the destruction of workers' pensions, both brought about by the Reagan presidency. If mega-corporations had not been given the excess power by these 1980s policies, trade with other nations would not have been used to shut down the U.S. manufacturing base.
@attsealevel
@attsealevel 2 года назад
​@@brianarbenz7206 Your comments are ill informed. Corporate manufacturing goes where it's cheapest, tax incentives are greatest and political risk assessable (simple as that). US production transferred overseas based on: -- cheap foreign labor with solid skillset -- efficient distribution channels -- oppressive US regulations (that continues to grow) -- labor unions in the US that stymie real opportunity. -- high US corporate taxes relative to other countries. -- legacy pensions that grew out of sync, and unions refusing to allow self-directed 401k's in their stead. I could go on... If this was, as you suggest, a "Reagan" problem, you might ask yourself why then did the trade deficit explode during Carter's term or why didn't trade directions reverse during the Clinton Obama years. Your response is based on political idealism (and not at all realistic).
@attsealevel
@attsealevel Год назад
​@Beatnik I think you misunderstood - I'm talking smart trade, not isolationism. For example, China limits foreign ownership of all property and assets to 49% (a minority stake). However, China has bought thousands of European and US companies (outright) rich in design and manufacturing patents - only to strip them of this intellectual property and repatriate. China also owns a few of the largest real estate trusts in Amerika (and therefore landlord to millions of US housholds). China also own a few of the tallest buildings in New York and other cities (where it also collects rent). And do you know that China bought most of that property (at a discount) via a tax loophole for foreign investors that existed for almost 40 years. I am German and do not like Trump so very much, but it was his administration that finally ended this absurd technicality.
@attsealevel
@attsealevel Год назад
We do not allow this same property ownership, but we are not happy that China has stolen entire German industries. For example, at Siemens (where I work) we have lost many technolgies in transportation, robotik, power plant, jet engine and precision tool design to China. It has all been stolen. China has always failed to observe WTO, IMF, GATT, ILO... protocols. And do you know it still gets most favored "developing" nation discounts (even though it has the most foreign reserves in the world by far). And they also don't respekt patent law, but they have bought about half the world's patents and now China instigates more patent lawsuits than any other country.
@joebagodonuts7563
@joebagodonuts7563 8 лет назад
The current occupier of the White House makes Nixon look like Thomas Jefferson.
@ThomasKossatz
@ThomasKossatz 6 лет назад
Sorry, no. The one was a smart criminal, the other is - Trump.
@mikehiggins946
@mikehiggins946 Год назад
​@@ThomasKossatz what is your honest opinion of Biden? I'll grant you that Biden was a reaction to Trump if you'll admit that Trump was a reaction to Obama. Both Biden and Trump were ultimately elected because the alternative (HRC and Trump) were unthinkable as alternatives.
@thachhuynh5462
@thachhuynh5462 9 месяцев назад
We had bad presidents every now and then but they all had one thing in common, for a better future of America. Trump is really something else, no ideology, sympathy, absolutely no regards for anything , anybody and of course not his country. As bad as Nixon was, he still didn’t wanna challenge the election result after Kennedy won even he didn’t agree with it just because it would devide the country.
@MFK1967
@MFK1967 Год назад
Pure fantasy
@data.anti-con8477
@data.anti-con8477 6 лет назад
Jim Hoagland's book, 'The Secret Agenda' is a great expose on so much.
@steveweinstein3222
@steveweinstein3222 Год назад
What a crock!
@fredhoupt4078
@fredhoupt4078 8 лет назад
That was interesting. Historians need to hear many points of view before they write their books. This will be a handy source to consider. Personally, Dean gives me the creeps and I have grave doubts about his motives at that time and since then. But, the clear picture will emerge over time as documents surface and are given consideration by sharp historians.
@pillettadoinswartsh4974
@pillettadoinswartsh4974 6 лет назад
Historians don't rely on "points of view" You are entitled to your own opinions, not your own facts.
@amaxamon
@amaxamon 6 лет назад
A couple of Nixon historians have mentioned the book, so it might be useful in the future.
@inkyguy
@inkyguy 2 года назад
Historians know these theories _ad nauseam._ This is merely a recapitulation of Nixon’s claims that his library and foundation existed to promote. It was his mouthpiece until well after Nixon’s death when it finally came under the control of the National Archives and an independent board that wasn’t beholden to Nixon. It existed as an institution is to glorify Nixon and in regards to Watergate to further Nixon’s atttenpt to say don’t look here where all of this tangible evidence of crimes and corruption exist; look over hear instead and imagine that there was a conspiracy - or better yet, a whole set of conspiracies - based on random things we will loosely string together. I’ve been to you library and they still maintain a wall near the entrance which summarizes Nixon’s claims and the propaganda that the library was pushing while it was still Nixon’s mouthpiece. Mind you, it never addresses ANY of the actual evidence; it just says that there was “a conspiracy of elites out to get him.”
@cindysammy2513
@cindysammy2513 2 года назад
Exactly
@kaljic1
@kaljic1 9 месяцев назад
While all that might be true, yours is basically a white wash. Dean probably had ulterior motives, but Nixon was moving to have Dean take the rap on the break-in. Dean just beat him to it. And ALL these conspiracies may have been true. But what about the Break-It? You don't deny Nixon had a hand in that? You deny Nixon tried to cover it up? That he had an enemies list? That he sicked the IRS on his enemies?
@mattheffner6831
@mattheffner6831 3 года назад
I'm a big Bob Halderman fan
@George-ni5ic
@George-ni5ic 2 года назад
???
@larryrouse6322
@larryrouse6322 4 года назад
Get out your tin foil hats folks. This guy is going to take you down the rabbit hole.
@KarlKrogmann
@KarlKrogmann 3 года назад
I got into this 14:37 before my feet hit the floor. Wow.
@Ilusionariat
@Ilusionariat 3 года назад
It was so thorough and well-explained presentation. Very inforimative!
@juanitaantonson1365
@juanitaantonson1365 2 года назад
how does this gentleman explain nixons conversations on the tapes i just felt like a lot of double talk. another author trying to make money
@brianlogan4243
@brianlogan4243 6 месяцев назад
Too bad Dean will not meet him for a public debate. Hes actually correct on a lot. Its not that Nixon wasnt wrong, its how the Kennedy Democrats bent and broke laws to do it.
@ThomasKossatz
@ThomasKossatz 7 лет назад
This is a prototype of a Chewbacca defense. Sheppard confuses listeners with questioning details of no importance. To make things very clear: The testimonial Dean gave was 100 % supported by hundreds of hours of tape. Not one of his claims was wrong - even today. In twisting the facts Shepard is as talented as Nixon. Brothers-in-crime.
@RainyG-T
@RainyG-T 5 лет назад
What testimony from Dean? The testimony he gave to the Ervin committee or the testimony he gave on behalf of the special prosecutor? The guy couldn't keep his slippery lies straight in either instance. And you say he "was supported 100% by hundreds of hours of tape", but you don't say *what* was supported? You just throw out a generalization and hope we just accept the broadly constructed official narrative. You don't address any of the details that show that the so-called "cover-up" discussed in the Nixon tapes was anything but or the fact that there was never any evidence that Nixon ordered a blackmail payment. In ignoring the actual details and holding to the official narrative, you people are as talented as the corrupt apparatus that sought to take Nixon out. They'd be very proud of water carriers like you.
@andrewhoyle1521
@andrewhoyle1521 4 года назад
@@RainyG-T Theres a tape of NIXON approving of blackmail money to john dean. He knew hush money was being paid out to the burglars. If the NIXON administration had a shred of evidence of impropriety conducted by DEAN u could use an egg timer to see how long it wouldve taken them to tell everyone about his behavior.
@RainyG-T
@RainyG-T 4 года назад
@@andrewhoyle1521 No such tape exists. The payment being approved by Nixon was not blackmail money. It was conceded by the Special Prosecutor during the cover-up trial that all of this money went for documented legal and living expenses for the defendants and their families in the long period before their trials. This was never for a payment to keep quiet, especially considering the roles of the burglars had already been clearly gleaned.
@andrewhoyle1521
@andrewhoyle1521 4 года назад
@@RainyG-T out of the kindness of his heart he gave the burglars money?? What about the dean cancer tape. I know where we can get a million dollars. The special prosecutor didnt even exist in 1972 when money was given to the burglars how could that be approved. It was clearly hush money
@RainyG-T
@RainyG-T 4 года назад
@@andrewhoyle1521 Clearly? No, the only thing clear here is that you don't have a clue what you're talking about. That's clear by your misunderstanding of "cancer on the presidency" comment and the fact you don't think there was a special prosecutor. Look up Archibald Cox and tell me there was no special prosecutor.
@gregp103
@gregp103 Год назад
Frank Wills should not be segregated as a Black man. He is the equal of any other man. I thought this type of racism - othering people - was put to an end 50 years ago.
@Dr.Pepper001
@Dr.Pepper001 3 месяца назад
Nixon should have pardoned Haldeman but he refused.
@Retroscoop
@Retroscoop 8 лет назад
OK, le's assume Dean was pretty slippery and managed to escape a long prison sentence a) if he had such a frivolous CV, why did the White House wanted him, and gave such a critical position as that of the counsel to the president to such a relatively unexperienced guy ? I mean, Haldeman wants him so desperately, that he tries to seduce Dean by getting him to the White House with a helicopter ??? I mean, I suppose no one missed his misbehaving during his applying for the job I assume, did nobody from the WH staff asked questions about it ? Or was Dean exactly hired because he has been unethical, and did the WH wanted someone like that, someone who wasn't too strict, too much law abiding ? b) Dean may not have told the whole truth, but didn't Nixon in fact shoot in his own feet, by refusing to hand over the tapes, by the odd Rose Mary Woods erasing crucial (?) parts, at least about crucial meetings ? I mean, John Dean could never have done "it" all alone: if Nixon fell off his throne, Nixon himself and his staff (sloppy selection of personnel for key jobs) were largely to blame. c) Mitchell was present during the meeting with Liddy and his (in)famous gem stone charts, and what, he doesn't rush to the president and doesn't complain: Mr president, we have a cancer growing from within, that snotty young lawyer who was hired by Ehrlichman and that odd character Liddy are threatening your presidency, and doing all kind of completely unethical things, like one would expect of the person responsible for the Justice Department ??? So no sir, it wasn't Dean (alone) who made the president trip, it was his whole entourage and his own odd actions. d) It still isn't clear what the burglars were after, what kind of intelligence they hoped to collect this way. No idea whether the Rikan-theory is the right one, it sounds a bit far fetched to me. I mean, did nobody checked what Dean was doing all the time he was in the White House, how he (mis?)used his funds, either for political intelligence or for private reasons ? In that case, again, sloppy work from Haldeman, who was the chief of staff and hence, responsible to keep an eye on those adventurous springchickens turning the White House into a Madhouse. e) After hearing the exposé, it's still not clear what the speaker's theory is about Dean. Well, he's slick OK, but was he a Trojan Horse for the Democrats ? An ace in the sleeve for Goldwater ? Just a disloyal guy who saved his neck, even if that meant the sinking of Nixon's presidency ? Yet something else ???
@ThomNorris
@ThomNorris 4 года назад
The simplest explanation and the primary evidence supporting it is often the truth. All those conspiracy books belong on the FICTION shelves of the book store or library.
@Retroscoop
@Retroscoop 4 года назад
@@ThomNorris There's nothing wrong with speculating, pointing out odd coincidences or "coincidences". We really don't know what is truth, what is fiction. We don't know why McCord was acting strange during the whole break in operation. We don't really know whether the plainsclothes policemen who arrested the burglars were close by just by accident, routine (previous break ins in the Watergate building not related to the scandal) or because someone within the Plumbers unit told them to be there (another possibility). Of couse people make money by writing books, so do Woodward & Bernstein, so does Dean (who probably had to earn quite a lot after his short sentence to pay his extremely expensive lawyer). Nothing wrong with that. Especially not if the books are well researched and contain elements we don't find in the "simplest explanations". We don't know if these explanations are simple or simplistic.
@ThomNorris
@ThomNorris 4 года назад
@@Retroscoop Yes there is. There is truth and there is supposition. In other words there are facts and then alternative facts..... which are not facts. The Watergate case has been proven and closed. To manipulate it into anything else is fiction.
@Retroscoop
@Retroscoop 3 года назад
@@ThomNorris Non facts could be working hypothesis. If the facts themselves are not clear, one might have too little for an "explanation". But if one starts with a hypothesis first, it makes it easier to understand where one could still find facts. It closes down a number of roads, and helps to concentrate on other roads. One should not mistake a "hypothesis" with "the true". A hypothesis is deliberate speculation, to help focus the research on certain aspects rather than other. What happens from there on is another thing. One can start bending "facts" in such a way they underpin the hypothesis. Or one can remain intellectually honest and say, well, I couldn't come up with any relevant facts confirming my theory, so either it will remain nothing more than speculation or I was wrong, let's test another hypothesis now, and concentrate on other parts of the story.
@shirleyhill2982
@shirleyhill2982 Год назад
Nothing on God's green earth can make Richard Nixon innocent or even an approximation of a good example for honourable young Americans
@dasgupta1959
@dasgupta1959 2 года назад
Just utter BS
@timquilty1496
@timquilty1496 4 месяца назад
He shouldn’t be given oxygen. He is dangerous.
@sheenak3733
@sheenak3733 2 года назад
Read All the President's Men.
@yaskyme11
@yaskyme11 Год назад
He spends a lot of time trying to convince everyone that John Dean was the key participant in the scandal. John Dean never indicated he wasn't a key participant. One of the main drivers of his decision to testify to Congress was the fact that he knew it was inevitable the investigations would arrive at his doorstep, that all roads led to him because he had been, in his own words, "everywhere" in the scandal. So what is this dude's point in leaning into a well known fact? To muddy the waters so the plain truth can't be seen. The notion that Nixon is excused from accusations of criminal conspiracy to obstruct justice because his intent was political is disingenuous prattle. Nixon was highly intelligent. He attended law school w/ highly competitive academic scholarships and graduated third in his class. But der duh, he duh did not understand what he der duh do when he told Haldeman to persuade the CIA to tell the FBI they shouldn't investigate the break-in because it was related to covert Cuban operations der duh doi. What tripe.
@carrow1057
@carrow1057 2 года назад
They guys sound like crooks to me.
@khaleefapyramids8425
@khaleefapyramids8425 2 года назад
WOW YOUR VERY OUT RATE..
@johnvercellone1988
@johnvercellone1988 9 лет назад
FOR PEOPLE WHO HAVE HEALTH, TIME AND MONEY TO LOOK FOR TRUTH,.SOMEWHERE IN THE LAST TEN YEARS IT WAS SAID THAT BOB WOODWARD WAS EMPLOYED IN THE USA NAVY IN THE JOHNSON WHITE HOUSE IN AN OBSCURE OFFICE OF THE USA NAVY..MAKES THINGS INTERESTING IF IT IS FACT..
@r.williamcomm7693
@r.williamcomm7693 3 года назад
Also, the fact that so many classified documents in a burglary & cover up investigation is troubling. The Special Prosecutor’s investigation was way too broad & wrong.
@summertime104
@summertime104 2 года назад
And imo, it was eerily similar to the Mueller political witch hunt of Trump. Especially that it's purpose was to get rid of the Nixon Presidency and the Sp Prosecutor had no restrictions and Carte Blanche access to everything, 60 Lawyers was a lot to Shepard. lol.
@Jasper7182009
@Jasper7182009 11 месяцев назад
If you believe that, then you would agree that Ken Starr went too far investigating Clinton. He found nothing in the Whitewater affair to pin on the Clintons but Starr kept on going. And finally a snitch told Ken Starr‘s office about an affair that Clinton was having. And I just bet you’re one of those fine fellows who wants to drain the swamp of Washington DC. But don’t investigate too much! Give me a break!
@gregmoore66
@gregmoore66 3 года назад
This guy is a liar.
@mikehiggins946
@mikehiggins946 Год назад
Where's your proof?
@burnhamsghost8044
@burnhamsghost8044 4 месяца назад
You seem triggered
@evanstein3011
@evanstein3011 3 месяца назад
I'm genuinely interested if there's a good debunk of Shepard somewhere. I've found him rather convincing.
@pinghsu4607
@pinghsu4607 29 дней назад
@@evanstein3011 I totally agreed what he said and I will buy his book
@ButchMcLarty
@ButchMcLarty 3 года назад
This guy is full of it. Zero credibility.
@slyjokerg
@slyjokerg 8 лет назад
LOL. I don't even need to watch this, now that I noticed what the account is, and especially after reading the video notes. It is nothing but cuckoo, ridiculous Nixon apologetics.
@mauherkan
@mauherkan 8 лет назад
+slyjokerg Right, I'm with you, we got the truth, this "listening to both sides" is nonesense. I'm especially impressed by your telepathic skills to know its "cuckoo and ridiculous", I'm still practising that.
@slyjokerg
@slyjokerg 8 лет назад
+mauherkan You are being childish beyond apt description. To call what you are doing intellectually dishonest would be a massive understatement. WE ALREADY KNOW BOTH SIDES. This kind of shit isn't new. It is nothing but retroactive attempts at ass covering and rationalizing and dodging responsibility. But let's pretend that I am wrong for assuming this is what it is. Name what is in this video that exonerates Nixon of his culpability. What is "mysterious"?? Prove me wrong. Keep in mind that smearing John Dean isn't evidence of anything.
@mauherkan
@mauherkan 8 лет назад
+slyjokerg You're taking me too serious. I don't believe this video exonerates Nixon. But it is an interesting lecture. Because Shepard is on the Nixon side you learn about the possible mistakes of his opponents during watergate. Let me be clear, he didn't convince me. I do believe he stays with the facts, but exaggeratus the importance of the slip-ups of judges, prosecutors, etc.
@slyjokerg
@slyjokerg 8 лет назад
+mauherkan I responded appropriately to the nature of your sarcastic reply. Nixon was a despicable scumbag. Trying to engage in revisionist history and to manufacture rationalizations that aim to shield him from criticism is laughably preposterous.
@marekjujaj639
@marekjujaj639 3 года назад
@@slyjokerg Nixon was a great president
@mcfontaine
@mcfontaine 8 лет назад
Has anyone actually listen to the tapes? Nixon was guilty as hell, plain and simple.
@roberth5435
@roberth5435 7 лет назад
John Dean listened and transcribed for his las book.
@betamaleHUMBLED
@betamaleHUMBLED 8 лет назад
great info! great presentation
@jeffmcdonald4225
@jeffmcdonald4225 3 года назад
There is nothing that anybody can do to explain away his criminality, when his own words showed Nixon to be a criminal.
@brianlogan4243
@brianlogan4243 3 года назад
I just think he got caught, today's politicians are far worse and the media is totall ybiased. you cant ge tthat high up in power without cutting corners. I think Nixon didnt know unti lit was too late, he didnt trust enough people to come pubclicly abd just say i fucked up . The tapes were what did him in. Lets not forget it was the expolsion of Nixon and his crew that made way for Rumsfeld and Chainey to the power behind the throne of Mr Lucky Gerald R Ford
@kalishakta
@kalishakta Год назад
Deep Throat was Haig.
@brianlogan4243
@brianlogan4243 6 месяцев назад
Ahh, No it wasnt! We all know now it was Mark Felt
@andrewhoyle1521
@andrewhoyle1521 4 года назад
This is a horrendous video. We have NIXON'S own words to prove none of these theories are true and NIXON is guilty as hell!!!!!!
@alexanderh9878
@alexanderh9878 Год назад
This was in 1988, I don't know hoe much was known then.
@gaylemc2692
@gaylemc2692 4 года назад
This is nothing but a self-serving piece for Nixon. I'm glad I haven't wasted my time going to the Nixon Library. Shepherd you were probably guilty to!
@jameskekula6397
@jameskekula6397 2 года назад
Span c my future name
@kkowta123
@kkowta123 9 лет назад
Shame upon you > Why are you still talking about this criminal any way?
@stephaniem3580
@stephaniem3580 2 года назад
A silly man saying silly things and it makes the Richard Nixon Foundation look silly. Come to think of it, the notion of a Richard Nixon Foundation has kind of a silly sound, so you might as well put up silly videos. On the other hand, it does suggest the possibility of a Watergate theme park. It would be kind of cool to be The Bag Man in the Funhouse getting cabbage to Howard hunt at the drop box in the airport. Or the plumbers crawl ride and Sidle up to a Madame Tussauds version of G Gordon Liddy
@rollerhater
@rollerhater 2 года назад
😆😆😆👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼
@cavecookie1
@cavecookie1 7 лет назад
This is just an apologist, trying to mitigate Nixon"s guilt. I don't buy these conspiracy theories without some real evidence.
@jjkouper5163
@jjkouper5163 7 лет назад
John Dean is a slime bucket
@pillettadoinswartsh4974
@pillettadoinswartsh4974 6 лет назад
Representing and hired by another slime-bucket
@josephmccormack6910
@josephmccormack6910 4 года назад
Dean was proven true. Everything lined up. Go hide underneath your bed. You refuse to recognize the truth.
@kermitkelly8833
@kermitkelly8833 2 года назад
Wait wait WAIT a sec....I guess the thing I never understood was...who was this breaking in/wiretapping going to benefit? Certainly not Nixon, he was already elected and re-elected to the presidency and not eligible to run again. Was it to benefit the next Republican nominee? That has never been clear to me.
@magiccitymelkite6161
@magiccitymelkite6161 2 года назад
The breaking-in happened before he was reelected.
@cindysammy2513
@cindysammy2513 2 года назад
He was caught on tape telling them to break in the Brookings Institute..
@hadawson72268
@hadawson72268 2 года назад
I found this BBC documentary filled in the holes in my knowledge on the subject really well. I think the reason he wanted the break in was to put the screws on a member of the press who was really giving him a hard time. It’s sad really because Nixon ( I’m not a fan) was popular with voters - he was re-elected in a landslide - but he just felt aggrieved all the time and wanted to smear this press dude and any of his imagined enemies. If he had left well enough alone he would have done fine. His lack of self confidence and confidence in the electorate and his intolerance of any critics lead to his downfall. The BBC did a good job here - I’m only 1/2 way through. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-fRCih5rUiVQ.html
@NGC6144
@NGC6144 2 года назад
@@hadawson72268 "He" meaning Nixon? There is nothing suggesting that Nixon directed break-in. In fact, "The Smoking Gun Tape" shows Nixon was genuinely surprised over the matter and thought the idea was something stupid according to his reaction. Having a memo state Nixon was looking to make good on O'Brien's retainer with Howard Hughes doesn't necessarily translate to Nixon was behind it all along although that may be one part of the puzzle that snowballed down hill to the outcome of Watergate.
@tombuilder1475
@tombuilder1475 Год назад
wow what an apologist Nixon disinformation video!
Далее
Roger Stone   Nixon's Secrets
58:36
Просмотров 167 тыс.
Bike vs Super Bike Fast Challenge
00:30
Просмотров 8 млн
Dropping In from the Clouds 🌁
00:17
Просмотров 848 тыс.
Known Unknowns: Watergate - Episode 5
46:08
Просмотров 9 тыс.
Why Does Joseph Stalin Matter?
46:20
Просмотров 1,3 млн
John Dean "The Nixon Defense"
1:00:07
Просмотров 91 тыс.
The Nixon Answer: Southern Town Hall
57:30
Просмотров 163 тыс.
Bob Woodward Oral History
1:40:51
Просмотров 31 тыс.