The Mysterious Cave - Naupa Iglesia 

@jerrywills Thank you for your response Jerry and the corrections to certain pieces of information in my video. I have heard about modern Peruvians blocking off the back of the cavern and I felt that to be more plausible than the ancient Inca doing this. From the multiple different local guides who told me it wasn't modern day Peruvians, I found it difficult to challenge what the truth was or to challenge their beliefs after their passionate guidance to these places. In the end, I made sure to state "the story goes..." as what I heard was just a story. I have read into your research, explanations, and experience to be very reputable; I wish I could have added your information and quoted you in this video. I also believe that this place is much older than the Inca's as well. I only speculate what has been declared through archeological consensus but at the same time, question their ability or methods during the time to be able to construct these structures. I believe these were ancient master stone builders and chemists who created these marvels with every possible method known to them. People debate whether they used chiseling or melted it; but why not both? I still find their process of melting stone incredible. I will research what you mentioned regarding the object that King Solomon used as I'm very interested in any history from around the world. The only reason I didn't mention a lot of examples from other ancient sites in the world, is because I only wanted to present what I have physically been to, seen, and recorded. Although I do believe there was an ancient world connection with information, ideas, and perhaps more. I have recently created a video talking about the ancient stone construction methods along with ancient humans melting stone to declare that they have used primitive methods sophisticatedly while also ingenious methods such as melting stone for different purposes. I left the RU-vid URL at the bottom of this comment. Once again, thank you for your time on this comment. It was great hearing from you Jerry. Ancient Humans Melted Stone: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-8u7x6xrGO8I.html

The shamir

​@@TheVoyagerTVThank you for the link to that video. I've been fascinated by Puma Punku, and the archeology of S. America for over 50 years, since I was a teen. Your video is among the best I've seen. Thanks for the work you do!

I do agree that these structures may have been from a previous time before the Incas. I noticed I actually did not state this at all in the video, and I disappointed myself. Although I questioned a lot on how the Incas could have actually created these structures with the information that I have found. Melting andesite or granite takes a lot to do, so I don't think the Incas could have created this.

please have a look at the LAH report by laboratory of ancient history by Russian scientists @@TheVoyagerTV

✌🏻Andesite and Granite vitrify, not melt. The silica turns to glass(vitrification). What we’re looking at is a geopolimar, a type of liquid stone, like modern day cement/ concrete but granite. Paul Cook explains all! Thanks !

Incas were terrible stone builders by comparison with the much older stunning work found in Peru. I have been to Peru 7 times and it's easy to see what the incas did and what the clearly didn't do , it looks like 3 distinct styles of work spread across Peru ..... The Inca being child's play in comparison

Inca people did not do it , it was done way before any Inca ever existed @@OttoChenault

Thank you so much Jack for your comment and watching. I promise that next time I'm there, I will gather the dimensions on the front alter for a 3D rendition. I'm skilled in using 3DSmax and other 3D modeling tools, so it would be very fun to do this! Thanks for the idea and your support!

At the time, I didn't have a selfie stick or gimbal to lever a camera down there. I still think to myself, "Why didn't I do that?" But I remember the local guide saying that these small cavern entryways are very dangerous and unstable. It was a quick look from the outside, and then I had to keep going to follow the local guide. I promise that next time, I will film as much as possible without hesitation.

Yes good question

Live or Die, hell of a predicament plus the disease that was spread by the invaders.

They didn't have Star Trek's First Contact Directives sadly..

Thank you Hemppie. I really appreciate your comment, and I'm glad you enjoyed the video! I agree, Naupa Huaca is such an amazing spot.

It's my pleasure and passion for making these videos for you and everyone else. Thank you so much for watching, and stay tuned for more content in the future.

Yes, I agree TonyLovell. Thank you for the advice, and I'll make sure my future footage that I capture will have steadier pans and steadier tilts for my drone and all other recording devices. There is a story about this for the reason my drone had shaky footage. While using my drone here, the GPS starting location point kept changing, and it ordered my drone to "return home."" The GPS was locked between the drone and my controller, and a downloaded map; not by satellite. It was as if there were a lot of magnetic anomalies in the area. It is a very strange coincidence as some believe Naupa Huaca is a portal. I kept having to fight against the auto-pilot to capture any footage. I understand that there is a lot of naturally magnetized magnetite in the area, but it baffles me how drastic my GPS changed constantly. I've flown this drone at the beach, over mountains, old towns, and the GPS never drastically had problems like at Naupa Huaca.

It's my pleasure, and I hope to take my viewers on another adventure like this in a future video!

I agree. Fulgurite was also a great stone for carving into granite.

No, flint is not. Where I grew up, in SW Pennsylvania, we routinely would find flint arrowheads, after the plow and raining brought them to the surface in the fields in the farms around us. Flint is sharp, it is not that hard. It being soft made it ideal for being fashioned into weapons.

@@carmaela2689 It's brittle like glass not soft. Hardness doesn't equal toughness or strength it just means that one material can scratch or cut the other. I've seen experimental archeologists use flint tools to carve stone like the Egyptians. It requires a lot of flint but it works a lot better than Bronze Chisels which quickly deform and lose their precision. The Stone Mason carved a beautiful Egyptians profile with only a flint core and a wooden mallet. That technology was lost to us... so there is that. 👍

Thank you! It's a passion for me to investigate these ancient sites.

That's very interesting and I have seen this done. Although a big mystery to that substance is that there was no pine or trees that produced a type of pine sap in Peru during antiquity. An interesting fact is that there are a lot of foreign plant species that were brought to Peru in modern times; such as Australia bringing pine to Peru.

​@@TheVoyagerTVexcellant! Thanks for the quick response. I am (on my fathers side, italian) a mason, son of a mason, grandson of a mason, great grandson of an astronomer (Matteo Colaianni). I have been watching tbe videos and compiling theories of my own and although i cannot give a practical explanation for these 'false doors' i will say, i could explain in a fairly strong argument that early ppl most likely understood geo-thermal energy and the use of steam to shape and carve. My theory is better explained in grapic but if a known vertical plume of heat/pressure was 'corked' in such a way as to re-direct the energy, steam having 1500 times the pressure as liquid water, being that water most likely doesnt have memory but instead attraction, at a particle level, thesd ppl probably understood that small amounts of saltwater introduced into lower sections of the plume channel (by drilling horizontally and angled slightly downward) would introduce a swarm of covalent bonding, multiplying the energy and or 'charge' of the plume. In contrast...redirecting this chemically induced charge (like electricity in very small amounts) instead of straight up (trapping it, like, with fluid resistance to build even higher pressure but this time with greater levels of attraction) become a sort of steam engine, thereby producing energy requirements needed to manipulate the far denser materials that were being used to build with. Alternatively, the steam pressure could have been even more easily achieved by drilling near active lava streams and directing the saltwater towards the pressurized molten lava developing even more power. Combined with hydro-energy from the use of bouyant matter (such as pumice or lava rock) could be used like energy storage and usage by simply displacing energy that occurs with the raising and lowering of the tide. I will call it float power. Tide comes in and large masses tethered by bouyant matter could thereby be used to shift to different locations. Sorry for the disorganized explanatiom. It was off the top of my head.

You're absolutely correct. Those were ancient Inca farming terraces. They are used all over the Sacred Valley in Peru, South America such as the ancient site of Ollantaytambo. It makes sense that if this was an ancient fountain and some type of aqueduct, it would explain how they brought water to their crops easily.

Yes you are very right about that and I recently bought a selfie stick that extends after filming that shot. The reason why I didn't stick my head/arm to look further into that small second entrance above the cave, is because the local guide told me it was unstable and to simply not do it. Ironically, in that video clip where I walk over and look into the smaller entrance, was also when my local guide Wilko told me to step away and be careful. I didn't include the audio because it was faint and not going along well within the video. I'm a very curious human but I also don't want to have time wasted by getting hurt because I didn't listen to someone with experience. The next time I voyage to this ancient cave, I promise you and everyone else that I will safely extend a camera down there. Thank you for watching TootlesTart!

I suspect that it was. The real reason I didn't dare to enter was that my local Peruvian guide said that the smaller entrance was unstable. There have been accounts of larger rocks collapsing and falling down from the mountainside cliff

There are two stories about this. One is that the Spanish Conquistadors placed crude gunpowder, creating an explosion to blow off the top Chakana. The second story is the early Peruvian miners and railroad builders in the late 1800s/early 1900s found this and blew it up thinking that there was gold or treasures inside the stone.

@@TheVoyagerTV WELL !Thank you for responding!either way All Humanity has been deprived of vital clues in the mystery of “ who and how these sites had been created and for what purpose. I wait for the Complete dig of Puma Puunku and it’s reassembled glory.

Thank you, I appreciate it Sav!

Good title and music use too. I see why it's getting a lot of views. This is a good video length I think not too long or short

I see that as well. I have heard accounts of native people explaining that this was a much bigger complex with multiple floors during antiquity.

I completely agree. The entire place with what's there, is an enigma.

That's another possibility if there was acid rain or other environmental factors that can wear this down. Although I believe that those factors wore down the melted obsidian on this.

@@TheVoyagerTV you are finally tapping the reality of all this, that many have overlooked. There could have been 2 moons. Could have been less microwaves because of stronger ozone. The light spectrum could have been completely different. Siesmic activity was most likely much more prevelant but one thing is for sure....it was different times that we collectively have no true way of taking full account. Matter could have been more malleable (down to a nano-scale) we just cant algorythmically reproduce the exact conditions of the past

Yeah, I understand and agree with you. I believe it's a coexistent meaning but both words can be better explained in certain areas of the world. They are definitely alcoves and/or altars for the deceased but it was a representation to bring the soul of the deceased through the doorway to the certain religion’s afterlife. In Peru, they were used as altars for the deceased for the afterlife. Although searching for the word "false door" in multiple search engines will produce a generalization of these types of altars as there are specific altars not for the deceased; such as an altar for a religious object.

@@TheVoyagerTV thank you for explaining - I will look up that term.

Wow let him call it what he wants to your comment screams that u felt offended lol

I believe this as well. Even though it's not some electrical powered tool that we use today, they've had tools and methods that we don't quite understand how they used them in the ancient past.

Can you show me or explain how 24hz sound alters the physical shape of andesite or granite stone? Although if they had the technology to do this, why was there a change in power and frequency for them to change the angles? It wasn't done on purpose to make them smaller as there aren't matching sides.

Thank you for your reply: maybe i didn't explain my self correctly, i believe they used some type? of hot plasma or sound to carve into the stone and with the right frequency / (Harmonics) ,hears a crude explanation of bending water at 90* angles ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-uENITui5_jU.html the u.s. military uses (liquid metal) to shape 1 piece drone skins of stealth a/c with a blend of Harmonics, Harmonics, are an essential aspect of audio. They are created when a sound wave is distorted or altered to produce additional frequencies and (shapes) of frequencies, I believe in this video they used the same stone to carve on ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-BsqOLCXYznE.html . i know this explanation is 3d grade grammar if that. @@TheVoyagerTV

@@q1o1mancow Hey don't worry about the grammer, you were fine and I understood. Thank you for the YT link showing the representation, I understand what you mean. Yes it's possible to alter objects with certain sound frequency especially for certain stones. The second YT link you provided me was pretty interesting. I understand the presentation it was displaying about using sound frequency with copper on stone with weight to make the cylindrical cut-out shape. I understand how he represented that phonon vibration was using negative mass or negative gravity to make the sound waves rise. With those certain vibrations on the copper along with a liquid or chemical on the stone will create particles of the stone to rise to make that cylindrical cut-out in the stone. Although we don't know what type of stones he used if it was either granite/andesite or limestone/sandstone. The clips in the video were also spread apart and we don't see the full process done which makes me a little skeptical about some of the integrity of the video but I'll have to take a closer look. The snake like cut out in the stone was also questionable because we don't see the process in the video but I understood the representation. But thank you for your comment and information on on this topic. I believe that some ancient humans were master stone masons and used multiple sophisticated methods during antiquity to alter and move stone.

Erich Von Daniken is a very inspirational man. Although in some places in the world, I believe it was lost knowledge that was spread throughout the world, which enabled ancient humans to create these marvels.

Something may be buried underneath all of those stones. Whoever placed those stones there were hiding or blocking something.

No one’s ancestors smh how about that

Yes I apologize for the tone. In my previous videos, i was told my accent was too heavy and I had to slow it down. Although I pumped the breaks too hard for this one 😵😵‍💫

@@TheVoyagerTV in that case, I will go back to the video and continue watching 😊 I hope to enjoy many more videos. Your content is awesome ☺️☺️☺️ You showed things I've never seen before. The video was refreshing in that it wasn't the same old stuff 🌟⭐✨☺️☺️☺️

As promised, I went back and finished the video 😊 It was very interesting. I, myself have wondered, "has anyone ever walked here before"?

Thank you so much brendadefazio8497, that really meant a lot to give my video a second chance at watching. You and all the other commenters give me the critique I need to become better and to make better videos. Thanks again, and I promise next time, my vocal tone will be better!

I apologize, I misspoke. Next time, I'll make sure to use the correct terminology. I should have said, "With a thousand time magnification on a digital field microscope."

@@TheVoyagerTV Sigh. 50x maximum, even real 100x microscope would cost you 1K+, not $15.

That's why this is just a digital field microscope bought from Amazon for $40. I do not believe that I need a real optical microscope that costs well over $1000 to take close-up photographs of rocks. I also don't believe that I need to bring a $1000 microscope to travel with through the Andean Mountains. I'd be naive to do that. I apologize for repeating the product listed features from its page, but I believe the majority of people who came to watch this video are interested in what was found with it. Although I appreciate your comment and will make sure to describe the products' real capabilities. What did you find interesting that this microscope found?