The Mystery of Hyperbolicity - Numberphile 

See brilliant.org/numberphile for Brilliant and 20% off their premium service & 30-day trial (episode sponsor). More videos with Holly: ru-vid.com/group/PLt5AfwLFPxWJ8GCgpFo5_OSyfl7j0nOiu

"I don't do arithmetic in front of people." I'll have to start using that phrase, it's brilliant!

When numberphile drops a new holly krieger video ❤

"I don't do arithmetic in front of people". I respect that.

I remember Holly in college (at U of I) and she was exactly like she is in this video: humbly brilliant.

I love how she summarizes a difficult problem so succinctly!

"I'll be impressed if anyone remembers (the Mandelbrot Set)." OMG I LOVE THE MANDELBROT SET, HOLLY! Just my inner thoughts coming out.

This is another one of those things that sound really simple but no one can prove either way, similar to the Collatz conjecture or the twin prime conjecture. I find it fascinating that with all the progress in maths over the last few centuries stuff like this still eludes us.

Well I didn't know before and I still don't know, but now I know nobody else knows. Progress!

My favourite Numberphile guest talking about an interesting phenomena around the mandelbrot set - this is like a perfect video :)

She is back!! Her videos are one of the more memorable ones on this channel for me. Glad she did another one. Hoping for more.🤞

Always love seeing more of Holly.

A *new* video with Holly talking about iteration of Zed and the M set.. my day just got substantially better.

Out of all the things to talk about, squaring a number and adding another to it is definitely up there.

Fascinating. Will there be a part 2? I'd love to go deeper in to this topic.

this is the sweetest woman on the entire planet earth. the kind of woman you would want as a parent or teacher when you're a child. the kind of woman you would want to marry when you're an adult and stay together until you're both 200 years old. this isn't hyperbole, I'm sure a few hundred years back poets would write countless books and plays about women like her, and emperors would fight wars over her. her smile is burning my heart

The Mandelbrot set is my favourite mathematical bug. It has so many weird features. Especially zooming in and in and finding baby Mandelbrots hiding among the hairs.

Professor Krieger will always have my main cartiod.

I like how this one and the last -1/12 video revisits on the old hits of this channel and the same professors go much deeper into the same topic.

"I don't do arithmetic in front of people" is a great libe!

the minute i see a video with holly i click INSTANTLY

Back in the 80s/90s, the Mandelbrot set was the bases of one of my favorite screensavers for After Dark.

Finally came to know some open questions dealing with the Mandelbrot set! Thanks Prof. Krieger, and thanks Brady!

All my homies love Prof. Krieger 😍

“I’ll be impressed if anyone remembers.” Professor, you’re dealing with a crowd that watches math videos on RU-vid for fun. I’d be more impressed if anyone clicked on this video and didn’t remember. 😂

Professor Krieger's videos are the best. Thank you

Thank you brady and every professor appearing on numberphile for these videos. I started doing a maths degree because of them and will be starting second year next week ❤ 😊

This is basically why I love maths. There’s so much proofs and even more to learn. Things like this get my brain juices flowing and why I can’t sleep

So nice to see Professor Krieger again, and her midwestern cheer! 😏

So happy she's back making videos! :)

Holly is my absolute fav!! So glad to see her back

I love her enthusiasm! This is top notch!

Wow - up or down till you hit the graph left or right hit the line - love that visual!

Veritasium's video: "This equation will change how you see the world (the logistic map)" has some excellent perspectives on this concept if anyone wants to check it out.

What an unexpected video and intriguing (bounded and countable?!) result, thanks Professor Holly!

Super interesting as always. Thank you for your videos!

Most charming laugh on Numberphile. 🙂

Holy Holly! ❤😊 Happy to see you again! Come visit the states for a guest lecture here🎉

Happy to be reintroduced to the Mandelbrot set in such an intuitive way. Of course I spotted it early on, I watched all your older videos and I'll never forget those.

one of the coolest videos I've ever seen

Love Holly. Always more Holly please!

Who else here is completely in love with Professor Krieger?

Nice stuff ! Thank you.

It's nice to know there are things to find out.

Love seeing the CMS in the background

Density of Hyperbolicity, I'll be working that into as many conversations as I can today

Fascinating thank you!

I remember an exhibition at the art gallery in Southampton University (where I studied maths) of computer-generated images of portions of the Mandelbrot set. It was beautiful. This would have been in the mid-1980s when such things required expensive computers to make, so a lot of people had never seen it before.

I love how this channel makes videos with seemingly the notes of mathematicians.

JoCo's song about the Mandlebrot Set was actually stating the formula of the Julia set.

Soooo.... We need to try to look for singularities in the complex plane, within the bulbs of the Mandelbrot that violate this conjecture? I see two potential levels to this. 1. Points within a bulb that don't converge. 2. Points within a bulb that have a different orbit period than their neighbors. (They would be hyperbolic, but I think this alone would still be interesting) I feel like analytical approaches are the only viable option...

This will be the best video ever!!!!

-3/4 is exactly at the border of the big blob (the area that have 1 final point) and the smaller blob (2 final points) so I will say take the average and make it have 1.5 final points :D

I love these vids, I really do 😊

Mandelbrot by Holly is a series ! I need to buy colored sharpies for math brain teasers, its so much fun 🤩😂

I hope Dr. Krieger will go back being a frequent guest of the channel. It's very interesting that such an easily stated problem is still without an answer.

Another candle of light in the darkness of the Mandelbrot set. You've got an intersting recursion/iteration there, as the Ben Sparks video about orbits in the different blobs of the Mandelbrot set was visualizing the numbers of the series and how the split up, when you go from one blob to another, and Ben Spark was saying at one point, that this is what Hallo Krieger was showing in an earlier video. And Holly, I actually do remember the core Meaning of the Mandelbrot set dividing the plane of complex numbers in convergent or divergent, and I also understand the convergent cases can be very different, the first case can even be covered by determinig the point where y=x meets the x^2-1/2 parabola analytically, but I guess only a limited number of such cases exist, especially whenc actually is a complex number. And it's fascinating that even a simpler number like -3/2 is not known to have the hyperbolic feature or not. I haven't tried but I know throwing a program at this you will easily get an answer that you can't decide whether it's due to the precision limits of floating numbers or mathematically true or false. So does it boil down to finding new mathematically purely analytical methods that can replace the iterative approximation method? Or is it more like proving whether the iterative method works well and which crietria have to be met? Just like you can find counter examples for the Newton's method to finding roots of functions failing?

Two questions occur to me: 1) In the first couple of examples, I would have liked to know what the one or two numbers converged to ARE. 2) I wonder whether you could iterate FROM these numbers and GET BACK TO the original number (zero). Like, instead of square and add, you could take the square root and subtract, etc.

z^2 is a vector operation. While it technically isn't a vector, it's still doing vector stuff. The angle it makes with [1,0] is doubled and the magnitude is squared. Same thing with z^n. That plus 'c' part is a resultant operation. So, 'c' can also be a vector, and you can also square it. 'z' is under iteration, 'c' is not. 'c' is a constant. But it has that vector angle multiplication relationship with the original pixel. Since you know the vector aspect of this, you can now make a Mandelbrot Set based on area, instead of distance squared.

OMG! Welcome back! I wish I had married you 10 years ago, you got a ring some years ago :( Your brain and beauty is beyond phsysics! Great video btw :)

Holly is wonderful.

Yay, Holly!

From 3:41 onwards it looks to me as it it were still converging to the one intersection point, just a bit slower than before. Why would there be two points?

Pulled up my old Mandelbort set generator code after watching this. Now I want to improve its performance see how fast I could make it render.

I didn't know Amy Adams did math! Great video!

I love when the plot twist is FRACTALS! 😊

So cool. I hope to one day find a niche in mathematics interests me enough to work on it.

Smart and beautiful as alway Dr Holly

Density of hyperbolicity.. that is suuuper cool.

Way too short. I could listen to Professor K for an hour easily. And Miss Holly, yes I remember the Mandelbrot set and your other videos!

Wow, I'm stunned that that's an open problem!

this problem sounds like it heavily relates to the logistic map bifurcation diagram where there is a period doubling route to chaos as it gets closer to 3.57 and beyond that up to 4 it becomes chaotic with some islands of stability

It's a bit like the Collatz conjecture, but for real (or complex) numbers.

The second I saw z^2 - a constant Jonathan Coulton's Mandelbrot Set started playing and was waiting for how it relates.

I need more

Professor Krieger ❤

I'm no dummy, the last few videos about iteration, the Julian Set and the Mandelbrot Set I can understand upto a point. This one? I didn't get any of it.

Fascinating! Also, I have that same blue book-keeper-opener on the book shelf. How'd that for hyperbolic???? :)

I wish Professor Krieger had shown the first few steps of iterating -3/2 through this process.

There are so many talented/intelligent/fun presenters here but Holly Krieger will always be the best one. I know it's not a contest, but if it were, she'd easily win it.

The time I got intersted in fractals was also about the same time kkrieger hit the scene. That's kind of poetic, and I'm properly thrilled that there is still some mathematical mystery around fractals even today. Please visit Holly many times more!

Of course we remember Prof Krieger

Gooooooood morning Holly! My day just got better.

Excellent

Of course it's about the Mandelbrot set!

I created myself a similar conjecture for elliptic billiard (one ball inside ellipse), when you set the reflection law to be, the reflected ray going along the normal at the reflected point : "the ray converges to the 2-periodic orbit, the minor axis....except when you start at vertex of major axis, an unstable starting position". My real mapping function is more complicated than the quadratic you use (z^2 to z^2+c).

Saw the thumbnail of a new video with Holly Krieger > Immediately clicked

a special example is when z=0, c=-2. It converge directly to 2. any value of c slightly larger than -2 just give random outcomes, if c is slightly smaller than -2 will spiral to infinity

We know the Mandelbot set on the real line ranges from -2 to +1/4. We also know the Mandelbot set is connected (even if by very thin filaments). Doesn't that imply we know that -3/2 is part of the set and will eventually converge on a set of points? What am I missing?

What a contagious laughter :-)

I was just going to say ... "Very cool, seems reflective of the nature of the cardioid form of the Mandlebrot's non escaping values, that we see in its initial form.". I can't think of the mandelbrot set without imagining myself as the observer, creating the initial cardioid form, out of the circle that is the set when there is no resolution applied to forming it, before iterating. Such a nerd, what else to say! :| Hey, Holly no public arithmetic; Can we discuss multiplication, perhaps in private? I do apologize, could not resist.

Hey Holly, amazing video as always! I am a big fan of the mandelbrot set and love to cumpute rendering videos of it. In the background you got this really cool poster/map hanging at the wall. Is there a chance you can give me hint about where you got it or where you could find one of those? I would love to put it up as well 🙂

Fascinating as I think this branch of mathematics is in its own right, what I'd love to know is whether there are any real world applications of the insights gained from it. Does anybody know?

What limiting behaviors can non-hyperbolic inputs have? Do they all explode to infinity, or do some bounce around forever within a finite region without ever converging to a limit set?

I like to think that mandelbrot and julia set are mathematic visual representations of the edges of infinity. Is this a valid view?

A fun related fact is Sharkovskii's theorem: for real systems (vs complex like the Mandelbrot set), the possible periods of points can be put in a particular ordering, so that if a system has a point with period m, then it also has a point with period n, for all n which come after m in that ordering. And this is true for any real system at all, using the same ordering! Sharkovskii's ordering ends with all the powers of 2, so if a system only has finitely many periodic points then their periods must all be powers of 2. And it starts with 3, so if a system has a point of period 3 then it has a point of every possible order.

-3/2 at least appears to be in the Mandelbrot set computationally. Is it strictly that we can't prove it doesn't diverge, or could it have an orbit (without a periodic limit cycle) that continues forever without repeating but is still bounded?

I might just be stupid but they both have 2 points on either side of the line. What makes them different?

Quanta magazine just published an article on this. Do you have any links to papers about x->x^2-3/2 case?

of course I remember the Mandelbrot set