The Outstanding Engineering behind Kitty Hawk's Heaviside Personal eVTOL

Подписаться 45 тыс.

Просмотров 221 тыс.

50% 1

You can now Sponsor my next eVTOL Innovation RU-vid video!
Get your product, service, or content in front of an audience of 231,500 viewers per video [Average]
Reserve a Sponsorship ➡️ www.evtolinnovation.com/sponsor
This aircraft can travel at 180mph and has 2.5 times the range of Opener's BlackFly. It also uses less than half the energy per mile of travel than a Tesla Model S. It is fully electric and of course, it can take-off and land vertically.
It is Kitty Hawk's most advanced eVTOL vehicle yet, Heaviside. And in this video, I will explore the technology behind it, what are the pros and cons of this aircraft, And how it compares to Opener's BlackFly, the most market-ready personal evtol aircraft at the moment.
Watch Next:
📺 How Google's co-founder, Larry Page, is building a Flying Car Empire. The untold story. 👉 • How Google's co-founde...
Recommended Video:
📺 Pure HYPE or truly Revolutionary? The KEY aspects of Opener's BlackFly Innovative Design 👉 • Is this the best perso...
Related Video:
📺 The company Elon Musk wishes he had founded. The Lilium eVTOL Jet, no Tesla Airplane eVTOL Jet $QELL. 👉 • The company Elon Musk ...
Follow me on Twitter 👉 / evtolinnovation
I hope you enjoy it!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sources:
➡️ • Project Heaviside by K...
➡️ • Heaviside Soaring
➡️ • Forward Swept Wing Air...
➡️ kittyhawk.aero/
➡️www.researchgate.net/publicat...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you really enjoy my content, you're welcome to support me and my channel with a small donation via Stripe or Crypto. 🙏
Stripe: Buy me a coffee ☕️ buy.stripe.com/4gw034g0A27Xdp...
BCH 👉 1JRTiZg8TWWPajuue9EntM15q7c7TMZTuZ
BTC 👉 1JRTiZg8TWWPajuue9EntM15q7c7TMZTuZ
ETH 👉 0x9041e9c8694a05b6c0c4c575cf719f1062f28e4f
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Contact me: evtol.innovation@gmail.com
✌️
#Heaviside #KittyHawk #eVTOLinnovation
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
►FAIR-USE COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER
* Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, commenting, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational, or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
1)This video has no negative impact on the original works (It would actually be positive for them)
2)This video is also for teaching purposes.
3)It is transformative in nature.
4)I only used bits and pieces of videos to get the point across where necessary.
►NO INVESTMENT ADVICE DISCLAIMER
The content of this video is not investment advice and does not constitute any offer or solicitation to offer or recommendation of any investment product. It is for general purposes only and does not take into account your individual needs, investment objectives, and specific financial circumstances. Investment involves risk.

Наука

Опубликовано:

7 окт 2021

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 264

@eVTOLinnovation 2 года назад

You can now Sponsor my next eVTOL Innovation RU-vid video! Get your product, service, or content in front of an audience of 231,500 viewers per video [Average] Reserve a Sponsorship ➡️ www.evtolinnovation.com/sponsor 👇 TOP 8 most Advanced eVTOL projects 👇 - Lilium, The company Elon Musk wishes he had founded $LILM: ⚡️ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-fmiVd-CiNmw.html - The Outstanding Engineering behind Kitty Hawk's Heaviside: ⚡️ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-fL3-mWvkCD4.html - The KEY aspects of Opener's BlackFly Innovative Design: ⚡️ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-FQVAOHxFY0M.html - Jetson ONE. The first Personal eVTOL Aircraft that you can actually Buy: ⚡️ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-J-oQemKDGfY.html - Why JoeBen Bevirt founder of Joby Aviation is leading the Electric Air Taxi race: ⚡️ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-ypCnYVspk0c.html - BlackFly, The "FLYING CAR" that you can afford to Buy!: ⚡️ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-ZPl0YOliqCE.html - How Google's co-founder, Larry Page, is building a Flying Car Empire: ⚡️ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-FsIAS1XI2dQ.html - Ehang VS Volocopter | Air Taxis Race for the Urban Air Mobility Market: ⚡️ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-w_NAJBoFlUI.html& • Second channel | eVTOL interviews and short-form content: 🛩🔋ru-vid.com/show-UCOXyvN8Jp2uXslB-RqHrftw 🔋🛩 • My Twitter 👉 twitter.com/eVTOLinnovation • Contact me: 📧 evtol.innovation@gmail.com 📧

@throwapot 2 года назад

That is awesome! As batteries keep improving these types of aircraft will keep getting better and better

@garlandremingtoniii1338 10 месяцев назад

Negative. They are out of business. You’re another person that needs to do your research before letting your fingers engage your keyboard.

@neriksen 2 года назад

At least this VTOL aircraft actually has a glide ratio. Most of the opposition rely wholly and solely on the technology to maintain the rotors if one fails or separates you’re over your finished.

@captsirl 2 года назад

They could use something other than electric power and maybe someday it would be wort a shit. 150 years this is all we get. We did better in Afghanistan.

@adm7890 2 года назад

@@captsirl yeah, whatever. This is only a few years, if not months away from a 1000 mile range , while being extremely safe to fly

@captsirl 2 года назад

@@adm7890 Then why did you show a little RC model flying and not the real thing.

@adm7890 2 года назад

@@captsirl I didn't post that, but the technology is there and is coming upon us quickly

@captsirl 2 года назад

@@adm7890 Batteries haven't changed that much

@christopheblanchi4777 2 года назад

Nice. BTW: Stall at the root of the wing is the way that most wings are designed, forward swept or not. You always want to keep aileron control for as long as possible. That is what the wing washout is all about" The difference in angle or attach between the end of the wing and the root of the wing to make sure that the root stalls first.

@TigerMarine62 2 года назад

My root stalls at the most inopportune times. Good thing there's a pill for that.

@metrowireless3381 2 года назад

They extensively tested that wing design, i like it. it gave them 100 mile range and a top speed of 180 mph. The redundant safety featues and the automatic parachute. FAA needs to make it an easy to get liscence and it can then go He does an excellent presentation here, i might add..

@deanlawson6880 2 года назад

What a total kick that would be! I wish it wasn't so expensive.

@kadmow 2 года назад

It doesn't have to be, but as an "early mover" Rich Boys toy, there is a prerogative, on the part of the "Marketeers" to over charge for everything (also they can blame "Lack of market interest" when Vapourware evaporates).. NB, these novel configuration craft are often more a labour of Love by the designer/developer (or a fixation on the ridiculous for a lot of designs out there) , and they often go bankrupt in the process of fighting patent infringements when they should just get to market in a reasonable price point and let the economics sort themselves out. Easiest way to become a Millionaire, start with a Billion and try to market a New Aircraft concept.(stolen/Misappropriated)

@DFMurray 2 года назад

Blackfly, to be fair, is going for an entirely different aircraft rating. The rules governing ultralight aircraft (AKA no pilots license needed) are far different than what Heavyside is doing. Blackfly CAN go faster than 80mph but is limited down to that speed due to ultralight FAA regulations.

@DCMAKER133 2 года назад

Yea FAA regulations is the reason why personal air travel doesn't exist. We could easily see shirt range ultra fast and efficient air travel but FAA regs kill it.

@amitaimedan 2 года назад

Best vtol ev video I watched so far. Really informative and looks promising...

@garymyron6699 2 года назад

Shouldn’t you wait until you actually have a pilot in the plane before you start giving efficiency numbers?

@connor4787 2 года назад

Didn’t know Idubbz was an aerospace engineer

@vibhor0202 2 года назад

Lol..he almost convinced me that 35dBs behind that breeze won’t be audible and then whirrRrrRrr gosh its loud 🤪

@feliperibeiro808 2 года назад

that was at 1500ft, think he said 65db on takeoff

@tukos7370 2 года назад

The point is for it to be quieter during flight mode.

@nameberry220 2 года назад

Heaviside is my favourite eVTOL and these videos are really good!

@vaughnbay 2 года назад

Agree, great airplane!

@Sledgehammer1944 6 месяцев назад

From flying Tigers to flying cars oh my!

@RonLWilson 2 года назад

This is quite impressive!

@heinousanus9352 2 года назад

Pretty easy to keep energy consumption low when you can only carry one person & enough battery for only 100 miles. Pretty cool how the props are positioned there to cut peeps in half but for now Lilium has the best & absolute coolest rig in this space.

@Clark-Mills 2 года назад

The smaller the diameter the "fan" the lower the airflow per fan, the higher the rpms and the more noise generated. The bigger the fan the higher the airflow, the lower the rpms and the less noise it creates. If you push out fan diameter to extremes you get to a point where the fan tips are breaking the sound barrier and then bad things happen but before that it's sweet. An excellent design well executed, well done.

@seanregehr4921 2 года назад

The smaller propellers are chosen because you can fit more in the same space and this gives fallback options if and as you lose (a) propeller(s).

@Clark-Mills 2 года назад

@@seanregehr4921 Actually, I think the propellers on this reviewed craft are quite big compared to some. In time the compared dB of all will be interesting relative to diameter.

@andrewallason4530 2 года назад

I’d love to see a version with a 20 minute battery (5 minutes each for take off and landing quietly, and 10 minutes emergency reserve) with a micro-jet powered generator in the tail-boom as range extender (in addition to the slight added thrust) running on methylated spirit or ethanol. With the reduced battery size and weight, a tandem seating configuration could accommodate a passenger.

@kazansky22 2 года назад

I like the range extender idea, 20 min battery not so much.

@integza 2 года назад

Didnt know idubbbz was dedicating himself to engineering

@Hyperious_in_the_air 2 года назад

Lol, literally the first thing I thought when I saw him

@HairFollicle 2 года назад

Hey when are u gonna 3d print urself one of these and then make a video about it ? Lol

@deadlighthlif 2 года назад

Next gen tomato bomber 😉

@hfyaer 2 года назад

Hey while I got you outside your channel! Stop messing around and make some sugar potassium rockets!

@rcaviator8408 2 года назад

Omg Lmao

@stephenbrickwood1602 2 года назад

If you are going to push the air out of your vehicle's way then pushing it down means that you do not need a strong/heavy support structure like wheels that impact the road, and you do not need to navigate past all the other vehicles on the flat 2D plane/roads we all live on. Roads are heavy construction and need expensive maintenance. Drains, earthworks, bridges, etc. This aeroplane has 3D to manoeuvre in, and can be free of the only local airport and its congestion. In the horse and buggy day nobody could see the future of the automobile. With robotic planes we need less vehicles, as we can just call one up as needed.

@eVTOLinnovation 2 года назад

You got it right! 👏👏👏

@stephenbrickwood1602 2 года назад

@@eVTOLinnovation once you showed how little energy was needed in this particular vehicle then all the other aspects to the transport problem was obvious. Even they said how surprised they were with the efficiency of the design. And what it meant. With Elon solving the more extremely complex robotic control of cars and then once you allocate an altitude and a defined route, and have collision avoidance, you have solved most of the individual transport problems.

@luigiubbiali4508 2 года назад

@clivestainlesssteelwomble7665 2 года назад

Theres still a traffic volume problem and human behaviour aspect to consider.

@Raydio6 Год назад

2:40 a nice nod to the x-29

@PrimeMatt 2 года назад

Wow!

@ChevTecGroup 2 года назад

First video I've watched of yours. I was expecting to a bunch of BS mis-pronounced robo-voice words with false info and stock footage. This was great! Thanks for this. I remember when kittyhawk was announced as working on an aircraft, but this is the first details I've seen of it. Seems to fit the general aviation market well which is more realistic than the "flying cars/taxis" that most companies are trying to fill

@lnwolf41 2 года назад

Just wondering, what's the max cargo weight it can carry, and still provide the same range? Also is the airframe scalable to provide more space, with same performance?

@rays14ful Год назад

Not much. And all this about great batteries is bogus. From a guy who worked in this for a long time. It’s a fancy RC plane.

@PhillipAmthor 2 года назад

Can it also handle a failure of both front propeller?

@claudiozanella256 2 года назад

Great !!

@vaughnbay 2 года назад

There are a bunch of 'em out there, and each serves a different function. For my usage this is FAR and away the winner. It is truly an aircraft and can be fully utilized in the NAS.

@VikingsFan-sy2vc 2 года назад

jetsons I think have the best evtol.

@vaughnbay 2 года назад

@@VikingsFan-sy2vc what do you feel makes it the best?

@wadebrashear7517 2 года назад

@@VikingsFan-sy2vc Jetsons is really cool but I like the range and the enclosed cockpit of the Heaviside a bit more. Regardless, I want one of each!

@aroundtheglobe2592 2 года назад

Wrong numbers for efficiency! Tesla 270Wh/mile is for the car with 5 seats (even 7) so it has to be divided by at least 5 to have per passenger mile , that's 54Wh/passenger mile

@remliqa 2 года назад

It is still better efficiency /vehicle, though.

@eadproductions8879 2 года назад

Not exactly, 5 passengers will give less range.

@liamwinter4512 2 года назад

The numbers on lilium are also incorrect

@grejen711 2 года назад

How often will it be carrying more than one passenger in typical usage?

@stephenbrickwood1602 2 года назад

@@grejen711 Yep, exactly.

@lvinson5171 2 года назад

I want one

@foolwise4703 2 года назад

As a function, the Heaviside is definitely a step up!

@Jiffy_Park Год назад

omg....

@free_spirit1 2 года назад

are the Wh/mi measured over passengers? Either way, this thing looks like a blast to fly, and the VTOL capability makes it really attractive for people who would otherwise have bought an airplane.

@seanregehr4921 2 года назад

This is a single occupant vehicle. So the numbers are what the numbers are. Pay attention and you can answer your own questions.

@free_spirit1 2 года назад

@@seanregehr4921 I meant for joby and lilium figures

@rajesha980 2 года назад

👏👏👏👏 great From india

@VideoconferencingUSA 2 года назад

No audio after 7:33, tried several different times and even CC.

@link440 2 года назад

Same no audio

@eVTOLinnovation 2 года назад

Thanks for letting me know. I'm trying to solve it now.

@eVTOLinnovation 2 года назад

Solved

@FBA-Renaissance 5 месяцев назад

1:10 - I'll take the Joby because it seats 5 people 😎

@beattospec4487 2 года назад

I hope someone in your crew served in the Navy on the Kitty Hawk I for one have been lucky enough as a child of a Topgun instructor have been on it HAVE YOU?

@ausieking 2 года назад

12:28 wow idubbz is really branching out these days

@woowtech2972 2 года назад

Woooww cool😎👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻

@calessel3139 2 года назад

I can tell you from the video, there's no way that the noise level of this thing is anywhere near as low as 60db. It sounds as loud as a WW1 air squadron flying overhead.

@rogerterry5013 2 года назад

You need to specify cons toon per km per occupant.

@blakekelly4547 2 года назад

for real thought that was idubz

@MYOB990 2 года назад

Get back to me when they have the confidence to put a pilot in it.

@robertweekley5926 2 года назад

When it's time to make it a 2 Seater, > 8 Motors on the Main Wings, vs 6; + 4 on the Canard! Maybe 1 fixed in Pusher Configuration!

@kadmow 2 года назад

NB root vs tip stall is more due to washout not forward sweep - the forward sweep allows the main hover "thrusters" to be better centred about the CG with a shoulder wing spar behind the human payload. - yes there is "some" spanwise flow gains.. Nice craft. - maybe the foward - duckbill/canard - lifters could be extending from the leading edge of the main - with folding blades to act as a leading edge fence.. get the nose even cleaner. (NB, Yep youtube isn't a design bureau - lol...) -

@KiteTurbine 2 года назад

Nice to see Damon moved on after Makani

@eVTOLinnovation 2 года назад

I didn't know about Makani project. Thanks for sharing

@Gadget0343 2 года назад

The thing that has always concerned me about these new eVTOL aircraft is scary failure mods. This one, seems like it is much safer than most all the others I have seen. I would love to fly it.

@vaughnbay 2 года назад

Agree, If it is positively stable and the stick is connected to control surfaces and not a computer then maybe it will glide. As you point out the rest of them are not so safe. Most are using a ballistic chute. I'd like take this one around the patch too.

@xuyan2650 2 года назад

Wh/(passenger*mile) would be a good matrix to evaluate the energy efficiency. I assume all companies are using different mission profiles to get the range number so sometimes they are not too comparable unfortunately

@eVTOLinnovation 2 года назад

1:14 those are Wh/(passenger*mile) values.

@xuyan2650 2 года назад

@@eVTOLinnovation Thanks for pointing that out. I assume the tesla one is from EPA, the efficiency Wh/(passenger*mile) would be much higher if they fit 5 people in the vehicle (The flip side argument is that the average number of the passengers in a car is lower than 2 in general)

@eVTOLinnovation 2 года назад

@@xuyan2650 Yes, the Model S value was taken from EPA. (I think they use only one passenger for the calculation but I'm not sure).

@eVTOLinnovation 2 года назад

Source "The promise of energy-efficient battery-powered urban aircraft" www.researchgate.net/publication/352505370_The_promise_of_energy-efficient_battery-powered_urban_aircraft

@GiovanniEsposito5 2 года назад

@@eVTOLinnovation No, they are not. Tesla model S has around 55 Wh/mile * passenger. You messed up badly.

@kazansky22 2 года назад

I mean...... If it's inexpensive enough, I might think about a purchase, it's just that range really limits the mission.

@normaal4663 2 года назад

So a single Tesla can get my family of 5 from A to B for around 270Wh/mile and park in a standard parkingspace. To get my family from A to B in this thing you need 5 of those using 180Wh/mile which is 900Wh/mile in total and when you park you need a 30 by 30 foot area for landing and then how much room for parking?

@seanregehr4921 2 года назад

This is a recreational or pleasure craft only. Maybe for personal transport from your estate to the inner city and back daily at most. It lacks the ability to do much else.

@KlingbergWingMkII Год назад

The noise claim was very carefully selected. It was reported that the noise in the cockpit was 160 dB!

@rwells3376 2 года назад

Yeah, but you can't park it in your garage, or any standard parking space, so it's not much better or different than what has been on the market.

@CineMutt 2 года назад

There is no discussion of the prop and tilt mechanism design, or what testing has been done for reliability.

@mkllove 2 года назад

They talked about forward swept wing and trailing props and tilting design extensively...any other design aspects may be proprietary data at this point. They did do safety testing of multiple engine out failures and other failure circumstances as mentioned in video at 6:01. Did you watch this video ?

@racerschin 2 года назад

can it glide/land with zero rotors working?

@mkivy 2 года назад

And how much does it cost? More than this Ole man can come up with!

@sphericon3 2 года назад

Glad to see that Damon has moved away from 'Data Driven Design' to 'Good Idea Driven Design'

@littlescoutfpv9776 2 года назад

the lilium jet Is way more efficient because it can carry more passengers

@HairFollicle 2 года назад

Me watching this wishing i can have one so i will go to my university which is in the middle of nowhere. It would be so much fun.

@raincho7809 2 года назад

This is Very easy design. You need more try.

@GRW3 2 года назад

Black fly had a chance show off at Oshkosh and it was underwhelming but at least they had pilots getting in the vehicle, unlike this video. It appears to me that most of flying was done with a model. Fly the real thing at Oshkosh next summer - man carrying - and do as much flying as the ultralights do, then talk.

@Bonewerkz 2 года назад

How are the sailing capabilities,when the energy drops? With parachutes can't landing properly on an airport...

@jackspratt4343 2 года назад

How much does it weigh ? Complex rotor vectoring ! Black fly doesn't have that potential maintenance issue.

@picksalot1 2 года назад

Why not have one main engine with thrust vectoring at the locations where the propellers are currently located?

@dandare6865 2 года назад

looks like the Junkers Ju 287 from the second world war

@Capjedi 9 месяцев назад

Imagine that you're having a heart attack, and you could choose to fly to emergency in this, instead of a chopper!

@AWESEM0 2 года назад

Now imagine it actually had a Tesla dry battery and Motor from a plaid !!!

@aletrip642 3 месяца назад

What is the cruise speed?

@danielb516 2 года назад

i like it but i wanna trailer it to a cabin or something to scoot around

@ThisIsSolution 2 года назад

It's more efficient because air friction or drag is far less consuming of energy than tire friction. So airplanes have to more efficient because the matrix they travel in

@horse1-1 2 года назад

The energy consumption comparison is comparing this 1 seater to 5+ seater aircraft?

@garyvermaak9470 2 года назад

Kittyhawk Heaviside - twice as efficient as a Tesla Model S? One is a 1 seater recreational aircraft while the other is a 4/5 seater luxury sedan. The only road vehicles you can compare the Heaviside to is an electric motorbike or ElectraMeccanica Solo and they will trash the Heaviside on efficiency, eVTOL innovation.

@KobraVR 2 года назад

Yes but Tesla yo!

@theotherebikeguy1473 2 года назад

Agree however drive thru any city and see how many single occupancy SUVs you see around you.

@seanregehr4921 2 года назад

They used Tesla model S as a reference point people are familiar with. Besides that there is no comparison. No Tesla fan here either.

@heudevil 2 года назад

Please keep in mind It's an aircraft not just a car, it needs a push of power to take off and land, and power injection consistency to maintain the balance in the air. I would say well done!

@dasppg9737 Год назад

Love my model s but I wanna fly!

@seanregehr4921 2 года назад

What kind of measures are necessary if one were to say collide with a bird and the propeller cannot change positions any longer? Are you just SOL?

@ignaciomercuri7971 Год назад

Que esperan para instalarle un suministro eléctrico de celda de hho para generar electricidad? Y aumentar el alcance

@atlet1 2 года назад

The spanwise flow of swept back wings can be managed, but they are sensitive to side wind. They are used in airplanes flying close to the speed of sound or in tailless airplanes. Straight wings is better in all other situations.

@seanregehr4921 2 года назад

You left out the takeoff phase as a benefit too.

@zain786ification 2 года назад

Only 1 passenger? What's the payload?

@possle 2 года назад

What us the EHANG VT30 watt per mile

@tomduke1297 2 года назад

i think i would prefer it scaled up as a four-seater with more range. the increased maintainance and complexity from the tiltrotors would be a lot less of a factor in that priceclass.

@seanregehr4921 2 года назад

The cost will certainly double and the price likely triple for that much plane. Also at that point in time, one would question why to buy this EVTOL instead of a private plane? The private plane actually travels much further as well and has plenty of space even a bathroom.

@tomduke1297 2 года назад

@@seanregehr4921 i wouldnt realy pit it against private planes, its a VTOL. if you could have a plane, you wouldnt need a VTOL. but i honestly dont know how it would compare to a private helicopter?

@LarsLarsen77 2 года назад

TAKE MY MONEY!!!

@kinzieconrad105 2 года назад

They need a two seater hybrid for longer distance

@user-co8nd2jt1l 2 года назад

Thought it whas Edubz for a moment

@wjcarman 2 года назад

Is it fair to compare watt hr per mile between vehicles that hold different # of passengers? I don’t think it’s fair to compare to joby and Tesla model s

@dofus910 2 года назад

if you want to talk about efficiency you 've got to consider passenger count you cannot compare kitty hawk (1 seat) to lilium (7 seats) as you cannot compare boeing 737 (215 pas.) to 777 (368 pas.) without considering their capacities

@eVTOLinnovation 2 года назад

1:15 per passenger

@actbrow8888 2 года назад

Price ?

@bingobango4281 2 года назад

So how fast will the police Evtol go (:

@whatthefunction9140 2 года назад

I'll take a lilium

@RealNotallGaming 2 года назад

3:56 LoL 80 decibel

@BHARGAV_GAJJAR 2 года назад

Name of the craft is a tribute to Oliver Heaviside ?

@calvinlong1265 2 года назад

I like the design. However, my choice is still Blackfly.

@daviousmaximus6446 2 года назад

Also, it's a little on the heavy side.

@Radionut 2 года назад

Can it fly autonomously? I mean get in it put in your destination and it will take you there

@supportbmf9113 2 года назад

Nice but still i would put my money on opener's blackfly (the safest evtol apart from affordable, easy to operate and practical)

@garymccann2960 2 года назад

Sure sounded like more than 35 dB to me.

@calessel3139 2 года назад

Way more than 35db!

@FiftymonkeysonAtree 2 года назад

How can 7 passenger vtol be compared to one passenger vtol

@tcknitbitb 2 года назад

Yes, but can it go through a mcdonalds drive thru?

@eVTOLinnovation 2 года назад

🤣🤣

@jeffg5579 2 года назад

I would like to speak to the design team ! Please, have them contact me !

@adamwhite1920 2 года назад

Would only be improved by having wings that could be swept back at high speeds.

@pacoperez1012 2 года назад

That would also require to re-orientate each rotor, adding extra weight to the mechanism.

@adamwhite1920 2 года назад

@@pacoperez1012 there must be a way though

@pacoperez1012 2 года назад

@@adamwhite1920 There must be, but I think it will take another 5-10 years for such way to be found. We will see it, and hopefully enjoy it too!

@adamwhite1920 2 года назад

@@pacoperez1012 I look forward to it!

@KlingbergWingMkII Год назад

Oh, yea, the "cool" rotors! It was widely know that they had problems with throwing blades in hover - very scary!

@eVTOLinnovation 2 года назад

To learn more on eVTOL architectures 👉 ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-fmiVd-CiNmw.html

@andrewkonopka1152 Год назад

If the forward canard was a little more delta between the body and the motor and the tail was a simple V it would be perfect all motor placement is fine I just want a bit a hammer head look that's all I'm sorry if this sounds strange it's too much to ask for a 2 seater cause that requires a longer body at the very least a guy wants to take a girl flying with him give her a thrill like a barrel roll and then land and have a picnic in some quit grassy spot and fly back an hour later if the hawk could do that I'd buy it AK

@mp-xt2rg 2 года назад

It's not twice as efficient as a Tesla. The useful load on this thing is what 200lb the Tesla will carry 1200lbs without issue using only twice the energy.

@bushflyr7335 2 года назад

Wait. 20 MPH slower than the Joby, the joby has 50% more range, and carries 5 times the number of people. Oh, and the practical advantages of the props being above head level to keep numpties from braining themselves. I fail to see any advantage here.

@vishal01mehra 2 года назад

Imagine if it's running ardupilot. XD

@MrAutospec 2 года назад

ffs make half of props foldable!

@TigerMarine62 2 года назад

This looks way better than the black fly. The BF is bulky and appears very touchy on the controls. Watch when BF leaves the ground, it jumps and waggles excessively. That's not a good thing for the potential owners.