you've got to be kidding me! As someone who values the truth and evidence before accepting something as true, this is so bad to watch all these years later, do you see how the second woman got a complete miss, but then repackaged her diagnosis by saying it skipped a generation? so basically she can't be wrong. if she really can do these things, why hasn't she won the Nobel prize or is working in hospitals? exactly. Then again with the miss on the right corronary artery, she claimed that her diagnoisis of some ailment on the right side was right due to that, when in reality if she really had the ability she would have just said ''right coronary artery'' how anyone can believe this is beyond me
I understand your point, but first of all "if she really can do these things, why hasn't she won the Nobel prize or is working in hospitals?" - This is easily answered by the fact that mainstream science has a bias against these sort of things, even when there are multiple studies showing that it works. Secondly, expecting her to say ''right coronary artery'' reflects a misunderstanding of how her ability works and how most spiritual abilities work, which is that she has a general feeling about things and may feel it in her own body, for example, or see or visualize in her mind energy like she described. Getting spiritual communication directly through words is less common and I would describe it as a different spiritual ability associated with mediums. If truth and evidence is the primary goal, then we should be exploring and acting on whatever hypotheses have started to show evidence from previous studies, whatever the method, instead of ignoring the ones that imply spirituality or "witchcraft".
@@JoshuaMathias31the last point you made is actually how I critically examine these people who claim to do supernatural things. The legitimate ones use the occult hand positions, their language will utilize spells or witchcraft language, and they are performing feats that have been done by other occultists in history.
