The Physics of Magnetic Monopoles - with Felix Flicker

Подписаться 1,6 млн

Просмотров 1,2 млн

50% 1

In physics, why is it that things can have an electric charge, but not a magnetic charge? Can you get a magnet with only a north or south pole?
Subscribe for regular science videos: bit.ly/RiSubscRibe
Felix Flicker explores the magnetic monopoles theoretically predicted to exist in ‘spin ices’ and how this could lead to fundamental advances in electronics with the possibility of magnetic currents that overcome physical limitations faced by electrical currents today.
Watch the Q&A: • Q&A: The Physics of Ma...
Felix Flicker is a theoretical physicist working at Oxford University. He holds the Astor Junior Research Fellowship at New College. His interests lie in the application of geometry and topology to condensed matter systems.
This lecture was filmed in the Ri on 17 February 2020.
---
A very special thank you to our Patreon supporters who help make these videos happen, especially:
Alan Latteri, Alan Moore, Andrew Downing, Andrew McGhee, Andrew Weir, Anonymous, Dave Ostler, David Crowner, David Lindo, David Schick, Fairleigh McGill, Greg Nagel, Jan Bannister, Jan Všetíček, Joe Godenzi, John C. Vesey, Kellas Lowery, L S, Lasse T. Stendan, Matt Townsend, Michael Morrissey, Michelle J. Zamarron, Osian Gwyn Williams, Paul Brown, Rebecca Pan, Robert Hillier, Robert Reinecke, and Roger Baker.
---
The Ri is on Patreon: / theroyalinstitution
and Twitter: / ri_science
and Facebook: / royalinstitution
and Tumblr: / ri-science
Our editorial policy: www.rigb.org/ho...
Subscribe for regular science videos: bit.ly/RiSubscRibe
Product links on this page are affiliate links which means it won't cost you any extra but we may earn a small commission if you decide to purchase through the link.

Опубликовано:

1 окт 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 2,1 тыс.

@TheRoyalInstitution 4 года назад

Second time lucky! We have thwarted the audio fixing gremlins and got a working copy of all sound files this time. (When we previously tried uploading this video, it helpfully decided to get rid of all the 'noisy bits'.)

@johnwright8814 4 года назад

I did wonder where the noise was. You get an extra view now. Are you sure that the noise with the device the right way round? 1st is low frequency, 2nd is high frequency, yet the talk suggests that the first is without the device inserted, or the white noise.

@Kargoneth 4 года назад

Much improved! Thank you very much! Was there supposed to be a sound at 38:59?

@Kargoneth 4 года назад

It's almost fixed. There are still a few issues remaining. We need to send additional biscuits to bribe the video elves!

@jorgevaldivia7482 4 года назад

Thank you for that

@charlesfeatherstone9401 4 года назад

I’m just

@ZeedijkMike 4 года назад

I must admit I was a little sceptic when I saw the title but this was an absolute pleasure to watch. Interesting subject and brilliantly presented.

@bensmith6518 4 года назад

I sure hope you fixed your sceptic issue!

@jessstuart7495 4 года назад

Ah yes, the sounds of magnetic -dipoles flipping- monopoles moving through a magnetic material.

@SinnerD2010 4 года назад

still watching... yeah I clicked specifically cause of my skepticism of the title, I've always been told mono-pole magnet is impossible, as you could cut a magnet down its polar equator, and it would simply make two new smaller N/S polar magnets of the two pieces, and technically infinitely repeatable and naturally inherent property of magnets. curious to see whats up here. :/

@jackblack5082 4 года назад

Yes the title was misleading indeed

@mramzuk8 4 года назад

I thought the title was clickbait, and ended up enthralled.

@orangewink 4 года назад

I am alive and well :) Felix, this talk was magic!* And it was amazing to see Faraday's workbook! He's one of my heroes. (*and by magic I mean beautiful, understandable, exciting physics)

@MrV1604 4 года назад

ahaha we are glad to see you well and alive Jeff. Thanks for the amazing demo and the cool contraption.

@skeeterburke 4 года назад

Yes, very cool device, thank you! I showed my son how a magnet moves slowly through a copper tube and he thought that was cool. We spent a whopping 10 dollars at the hardware store for that

@stefansauvageonwhat-a-twis1369 4 года назад

wow

@permanentvisitor2460 4 года назад

Thank you for your contribution to this fantastic lecture, Jeff.

@Shady-Shane Год назад

may i ask why the number of winding varied from coil to coil?

@crashmancer 4 года назад

Always nice to see a physicist with just the right amount of showmanship to remind everyone that science ought to be fun.

@ricardoalves9605 4 года назад

It doesn't take much effort to make teaching not the most boring thing imaginable, but a lot of people still miss this

@stevetreloar6602 4 года назад

Well, not so much "ought to be", it actually really is!!! There is almost nothing better than learning something new! If it changes one's perception then that part is awesome. I've been wrong about things for years at a time and then someone says three (e.g.) words that can make everything suddenly clear!

@MegaBanne 4 года назад

If you do not conduct science for the fun and love of science it is not really science. Science is an art form. The fact that it brings humans further is secondary. To try to conduct science with predetermined expectations and/or wishful thinking tend to lead to so called biases. They are flaws in the way we conduct research. In this case it is the fact that we are asking "how can reality be what we wanted to be" instead of accepting reality for what it is.

@carlrodalegrado4104 4 года назад

Reminds me of Richard Feynman

@cydar 3 года назад

Felix teaches Quantum mechanics at Cardiff university and I have to say his lectures are just as entertaining as this talk

@tylersmallman 3 года назад

Tweed looking suit: ✅ Bow tie: ✅ British accent: ✅ Must be valid

@RollingCalf 3 года назад

For real. I clicked because of that.

@shrinksteve Год назад

Truly enjoyed this lecture. I am not a physicist but am interested in many subjects. Often, due to my education taking me far from the theoretical realm, I am left behind by in depth discussions in theoretical physics. This lecture was well done, in preventing this from happening, as the speaker was adept at using real world analogies that made an extremely complex subject accessible to a non-physicist, like myself! Hats off to the speaker and all his colleagues who contributed to this wonderful lecture!

@turpialito 4 года назад

Wish list: A lifetime pass to RI lectures, thank you very much :-D

@TheRoyalInstitution 4 года назад

You've got it! We film almost every lecture and they all come to RU-vid so just being subscribed, you'll have a steady stream of lectures coming your way. They are usually weekly, but we've had to slow down a little since most of the team has been furloughed during the pandemic. We're hoping to get back to our former strength soon!

@SimplyStuart94 4 года назад

@@TheRoyalInstitution have been subscribed, can confirm

@captainTubes 4 года назад

@Heads Mess lol don't hold your breath

@Gribbo9999 4 года назад

Excellent lecture beautifully presented. I never fail to get a thrill when it's pointed out, with picture, that Faraday (and all those other luminaries) lectured from the very same desk. How thrilled Faraday will be to see today's lecture after we invent the monopole time machine and bring him forward - but that's a lecture for a future time.

@PGGraham 4 года назад

Been subscribed for a long time. One of me favorite channels.

@Drunkensod1972 4 года назад

This is obviously a time lord talking about magic magnets.

@douglasstrother6584 4 года назад

He looks like Michael Faraday with longer hair!

@fecnde 4 года назад

Douglas Strother thinking about time lords and magic magnets - are you certain he’s not Faraday?

@douglasstrother6584 4 года назад

"Ah, the Royal Institute. Just as I remember."

@SagaciousDjinn 4 года назад

*Indubitably*

@Celticshade 4 года назад

thats what i was thinking, hes got a suit and a bowtie to match the 11th

@sebastianelytron8450 4 года назад

"An excellent team, plus myself" The moment I smashed that like button. 👍

@rca168 4 года назад

Indeed

@andreschoen9180 3 года назад

I too got warm & fuzzy over this most humble gesture.

@Alkis05 4 года назад

It is nice to hear from a physicist that is not a particle physicist, astronomer or cosmologist. I almost thought all the other physicists went extinc. We should put Felix in a zoo, to make sure his species survives.

@mahmudurrahman1696 2 года назад

why is he dressed like cedric villani

@charleslaurice 2 месяца назад

Who are you the dress code police or does it matter?

@obiwanpez 2 месяца назад

He said he tried to dress like he was from the 1800s, to echo Faraday’s Royal Society talk.

@3rdcoasttoast201 2 месяца назад

Spot on. Cedric is a trend setter

@estellescholtz5619 2 месяца назад

Gorgeous fearless appearance!

@ordinarryalien 2 месяца назад

This is his nonevil twin.

@yash1152 4 года назад

Timestamps: 9:10 9:26 - the paradox of loops 10:26 - Electrostatics --> Magnetostatics - asymmetricity in otherwise perfectly analogous behaviour (appeal for search of MMPoles) 12:49 - behavior of MMP wrt that of MDP 13:20 - appeals for existence of MMP 14:26 - (not mentioned, but i think it can also be related:) Quantisation of Magnetic Charge 16:01 - Basis of explaining quantisation of electric charges (appeal for search of MMPoles) 17:20 - some glossary 21:04 - particle-antiparticle - fractionalisation 22:01 - chess board analogy 28:22 - Energy in vacuum space 33:06 - Spin Ice name reason 38:20 - Noise (thanks a lot for explaining the types, and nomenclature with analogy soooo concisely) 40:46 - Paramagnets and dependence on Temperature 46:01 - electric current --> magnetic current 47:11 - electronics --> spintronics 47:20 - Moore's law 48:56 - logic gates (The list was made for the list of topics touched in the video initially, but later i extended it to function like TStamp as well)

@yash1152 4 года назад

Sooo exciting It touched and related soo many topics, and that too with sufficient ELI-15 details. I just finished my chapter on Magnetism in High School, so got interested in this vid.

@v44n7 4 года назад

Thanks a lot!

@Puchuchi747 4 года назад

Much appreciated! This comment needs more love!

@gwho 4 года назад

thank you

@pikiwiki 4 года назад

excellent work Pal

@adammenhennett 4 года назад

This is a brilliant talk, and so well articulated - thank you! First viewing I could not hear the white or pink etc noise. Then I went to my youtube history a bit later and the vid had disappeared! I see from your comment that these two things are in fact inter-related - phew! On second viewing now. Thanks once again.

@charliehubbard4073 4 года назад

This was a complicated subject extremely well presented! Also, I do very much appreciate Dr. Flicker eagerly giving credit to his team. Very classy move. Thank you for making this available. I enjoyed every bit of it.

@suprememasteroftheuniverse Год назад

As we can see in this video modern science is a big scam.

@Tech_Planet 4 года назад

Nice to hear about potential applications of spintronics! Great presentation.

@SkullTraill 4 года назад

This guy could sell me a vacuum cleaner that works by making the rest of my house more dirty.

@forknowledge6959 4 года назад

Reading most of the comments on here, people are so superficial. They base the content of the talk off of what he looks like in a tweed coat.

@urano4810 4 года назад

@@forknowledge6959 I actually think it's quite fitting. He looks like a physicist lol

@DAMORBEL 4 года назад

@@urano4810 Do physicists dye their hair?

@rakbar6509 4 года назад

@@DAMORBEL well why not ?

@christianheichel 4 года назад

I know I'd buy it.

@cyrilio 4 года назад

What a wonderful speaker. Loved the talk and learned so much.

@koktszfung 4 года назад

@@stevenlonien7857 how tf is that related to the original comment

@koktszfung 4 года назад

I like how he clearly knows what he is talking about and explain things with no logic gap

@christianheichel 4 года назад

Is a tripole possible?

@cedricvillani8502 4 года назад

He doesn’t yet just a hypothesis, the problem most the time is there stuck in there discrete minds with “laws” that won’t support what he wants in a closed system, they didn’t know about quarks tau’s muons or any quantum physics, no anti-neutrinos ect.. also there’s no particle there’s a Wave , vibration and physicists need to stop thinking in the macro. BTW if he’s worried about health he probably should go to HAARP lol.

@ichi-goichi6184 4 года назад

Another lack of any relationship to the ether by the cult of bumping particles.

@CrazyNerdInventor 4 года назад

I was there at the live lecture. It was supper interesting and well made!

@veritasiumaequitasius3530 4 года назад

Found what you're looking for. [Attention] [Virtue points]

@govcorpwatch 3 года назад

Except.... The search for "monopoles" is insanity. The Magnetic "force" is literally just a CHANGE in the electric field (eg, changing positions of an electric charge) propagating at the speed of light! As such, "magnetism" is not a REAL force... it is a derivative of the electric field. All physics equations must be rewritten in an electric field and not the "magnetic field" because magnetism is derivative of the electric field. There is no such thing as "magnetism" as a fundamental force. LOL. It is all an electric effect. When an electric field changes, everything around it must change their charges to equalize their electric connection. That change in the electric field propagates at the speed of light, and literally LOOKS like magnetism, but is not. See other videos on how relativity creates the electric force to look like magnetism due to the relativistic speed of the electric particles moving. How much money, time, and human thought is being wasted on looking for monopoles simply not understanding that there is no "magnetic" force?

@MilesPrower69420 4 года назад

coughs at: 1:51 2:43 3:03 3:17 4:05 4:12 4:18 4:22 4:47 5:08 6:21 8:48 10:21 13:02 18:48 19:27 20:46 22:06 22:26 22:46 23:51 26:01 26:46 26:48 28:07 29:14 33:32 34:59 36:03 36:08 36:24 36:57 37:04 37:50 39:12 40:21 40:35 43:25 43:55 44:20 44:31 45:17 46:13 46:21 46:43 47:24 48:37 50:33 51:20 52:00 53:17 some are quiet, im sure i missed a couple

@jessepollard7132 Год назад

left out one minor reason for being unable to separate the poles. To get a magnetic field you have to move an electron - but it doesn't have to be in a circle - just move it. and when you do you get a magnetic field that encircles the path the electron is taking. and ther is a north/south alignment to that field generated. and you can't get one without the other.

@griffmason8591 Год назад

Thank you for pointing this out, is a magnet with no flux a magnet? Quantum spin is 1 or 0, on or off, N or S

@georgesheffield1580 Год назад

For electro - magnets

@Mr-hn2bp Год назад

Electrons in an orbit assume spins one way or another, and if a pair of them occupied the same orbit they have opposite spins, creating magnatic neutrality.

@jessepollard7132 Год назад

@@Mr-hn2bp NOPE. without an imposed magnetic field they can be random.

@jessepollard7132 Год назад

@@Mr-hn2bp orbit in this context has no meaning.

@DanHonnen 4 года назад

Never heard of this general subset of interconnected theories or experiments prior to this, interesting stuff! Sometimes I wonder if part of the reason I so often enjoy RI lectures is how refreshingly humble so many of the presenters are about their own achievements. Regardless, bravo to the presenter!

4 года назад

We should all be happy to see the LBGTQ community is represented with the speaker.

@michaelmann8800 4 года назад

@ ????????? Are you his lover? I don't recall him saying anything about being LGBTQ during the presentation. Perhaps you were daydreaming, and that is what you heard?

@jamieevans5979 4 года назад

@ What a weird thing to say. False representation in fact.

@srvfan454 4 года назад

I like his suit, he looks like the 11th Doctor!

@lucazeuch855 4 года назад

Bow ties are cool.

@PovertyEntertainmentOfficial 4 года назад

Dr. Who

@moonwalkdreamer 4 года назад

More like the Highlander (Adrian Paul)

@leomadero562 4 года назад

Audience: " " Felix:"Impressive, I couldn't have worded it better myself!"

@moviesgregoroamin 4 года назад

No idea great question ! I tried max volume and sounds like "cause there an old white" obviously someone with better hearing must post what she said please!

@rorschacht8478 4 года назад

She said: "Claustrophobic oddities" ... Yeah I have no idea.

@premeditatio 2 года назад

I heard her say, "because there are more white," referring to the imbalance of charge leftover.

@laureen69 4 года назад

RU-vid algorithm is getting better at suggesting articles. You earned my subscription :)

@riaanlabuschagne1829 4 года назад

what if it is only a ? of timing north south east west same but different seasonal as it may thoth (emerald tablets declares )that frequency timing of a machine u turning around may define wheter the magnet is positive or negative but in actuality is is neither and only reveiling the way we preceive the current state as einstein and tesla said ac dc current

@donaldhines5051 4 года назад

You think?

@mandygiakoumarou8200 4 года назад

Just watched the lecture and found it very interesting. Loved the jokes and magic tricks Felix had prepared for his audience! Very talented young man.

@anonymous.youtuber 4 года назад

The beauty of doing research at CERN is you always get smashing results 😉

@leeming1317 4 года назад

In thrust... they trust 😉

@Gribbo9999 4 года назад

Once you've ioned out the difficulties.

@matc87 4 года назад

Lol and lol

@worklion50 4 года назад

yes yes yes ... it does accelerate our knowledge.

@DAMORBEL 4 года назад

@@worklion50 "it does accelerate our knowledge" But only in circles . . . .

@willyolio9590 4 года назад

1:10 "that was my best joke, it only goes South from here."

@cathyhanson548 3 года назад

@govcorpwatch 3 года назад

The greatest joke here-in is that Magnetism is being treated as a force... it is literally derivative of the electric field. really. The search for "monopoles" is insanity. The Magnetic "force" is literally just a CHANGE in the electric field (eg, changing positions of an electric charge) propagating at the speed of light! As such, "magnetism" is not a REAL force... it is a derivative of the electric field. All physics equations must be rewritten in an electric field and not the "magnetic field" because magnetism is derivative of the electric field. There is no such thing as "magnetism" as a fundamental force. LOL. It is all an electric effect. When an electric field changes, everything around it must change their charges to equalize their electric connection. That change in the electric field propagates at the speed of light, and literally LOOKS like magnetism, but is not. See other videos on how relativity creates the electric force to look like magnetism due to the relativistic speed of the electric particles moving. How much money, time, and human thought is being wasted on looking for monopoles simply not understanding that there is no "magnetic" force?

@anotherviewofthings 3 года назад

@@govcorpwatch Exactly. Happy that I am not the only one having this understanding.

@govcorpwatch 3 года назад

@Minghuan Mo It's so funny.... Many people ARGUE with the sound physics presented by the "Magnetism is just the electric field changing at the speed of light." and call me delusional for their own ignorances. This happens in many places in life... It's not cool any more. Thank you for being open and questioning rather than judgmental and harsh. You are a refreshing user/commenter that inspires hope rather than continued farce in humanity.

@christophercharles9645 Год назад

A fantastic lecture. There's certainly an art to delivering a lecture - especially to those of us outside the field of study - and Dr. Flicker nailed it with humor, without ever giving a feel of dumbing it down. It's also nice to see how gracious he was to each and every person who contributed to the presentation. Thank, R.I., for presenting this.

@MrJohnRWells 4 года назад

That was beautifully explained and put together. I hope to see more from Felix in the future - he's a great communicator.

@suprememasteroftheuniverse Год назад

As we can see in this video modern science is a big scam.

@Scientist_Albert_Einstein 4 года назад

It's all fun and games until you realize that ∇ · B = 0, Magnetic monopoles will violate this empirical law of magnetism. If they are ever found, I predict two things: 1.- I predict the universe will collapse on itself and erase itself from existence. 2.- If we are living in a simulation, the moderators will patch the bug and set ∇ · B > 0

@leeming1317 4 года назад

We already found the geometry of the universe is off, and now IRREGULAR and has changed from the past. So the devs do update, just takes quite a while.

@vaccinefraud5570 4 года назад

Brill.

@AirborneAnt 4 года назад

If a positive monopole was possible, it would just be spewing out emerging from a point in space...I wonder if black/white holes have anything to do with it...

@u1zha 4 года назад

@@BeLikeWater electrons only push other electrons, they attract positively charged particles... Positively charged particles like protons, positrons, ...

@DAMORBEL 4 года назад

@@BeLikeWater "if there is an opposite found" isn't that a proton or a bunch of quarks?

@craig8128 4 года назад

That was freaking great! I’m impressed with his ability to deliver such a lecture with such clarity and articulation. And yeah, if he ever decides to leave physics, he’s hands-down the next Doctor Who.

@patricksslkpatricksslk2624 2 года назад

Lol that's true

@matthewshammami6433 4 года назад

Me: Mom, can we have Cedric Villani? Mom: No, we have Cedric Villani at home Cedric Villani at home:

@trewq398 4 года назад

They look similar

@peppybocan 4 года назад

exactly my thoughts.

@ericderbez2446 4 года назад

For a second there I thought Cedric had switched from maths to physics. They both share the same style. His scientific doppelganger (or sosie would be better)!

@milantrcka121 4 года назад

He seems more Newtonesque to me...

@mamourizd 4 года назад

@@ericderbez2446 Technically Cedric Villani has already done that since he's specialized in mathematical physics

@sierrainfinity1785 4 года назад

Absolutely riveting lecture. It popped up as a random video and I started watching it wondering what in the heck does it mean to have a magnetic monopole. I am glad it did because the explanation was very simple and thought provoking. Favorite quote is from Faraday "What use is a new born baby?" I hope to see more about this baby's achievements in my life time. Thank you Felix Flicker PhD.

@BladeRunner-td8be 4 года назад

Fascinating content and Felix Flicker was outstanding. I think he had some apprehension about whether or not his audience was following him based on the number of questions he asked. He seemed so relieved every time they answered correctly. Cheers, John Noe

@kruksog 3 года назад

Yes, I was very impressed with the quality of his speaking, as well as his ability to explain. I have a degree in mathematics, so perhaps I'm a bit better equipped to understand the kinds of things he talks about, but I wanted to add that not once did I struggle to understand his explanations.

@suprememasteroftheuniverse Год назад

As we can see in this video modern science is a big scam.

@itsraahul 4 года назад

Damn, I had no background info regarding the target still I listened to the whole talk & his explanation kept me glued to the screen 🙏 such an awesome Professor, big respect to everyone involved in this project 👌

@xenatron9056 4 года назад

same, above my head due to no background knowledge, super interesting, will watch more than once.

@govcorpwatch 3 года назад

This may help you think about the relationship between the electric field and magnetic force: Magnetism is an emergent property of the electric field. The search for "monopoles" is insanity. The Magnetic "force" is literally just a CHANGE in the electric field (eg, changing positions of an electric charge) propagating at the speed of light! As such, "magnetism" is not a REAL force... it is a derivative/emergent property of the electric field. All physics equations must be rewritten in an electric field and not the "magnetic field" because magnetism is derivative of the electric field. There is no such thing as "magnetism" as a fundamental force. LOL. It is all an electric effect. When an electric field changes, everything around it must change their charges to equalize their electric connection. That change in the electric field propagates at the speed of light, and literally LOOKS like magnetism, but is not. See other videos on how relativity creates the electric force to look like magnetism due to the relativistic speed of the electric particles moving. How much money, time, and human thought is being wasted on looking for monopoles simply not understanding that there is no "magnetic" force?

@suprememasteroftheuniverse Год назад

As we can see in this video modern science is a big scam.

@suprememasteroftheuniverse Год назад

Govcorpwatch is right. This is a scam to get money for "research". 100% of called modern physics and quantum anything this: scam. Pure esoteric mambo jambo reheated for ignorant audiences. 99% of the science fan boys understand 0% of what's said.

@raymitchell9736 4 года назад

I liked the 19th century theme and have fun learning something interesting as well... this is an unforgettable talk as it has the charm of an explorer tale and at the same time talking about the cutting edge 21st century science.

@paulgray1318 3 года назад

Yes and brilliantly utilised to include the people behind the scene which usually go overlooked and they did that lovely and hats off to them all.

@anuj18 4 года назад

He looks so much like Cedric Villani! Looks like a very interesting topic.

@DrogoBaggins987 4 года назад

From some angles he looks just like a younger Adrian Paul as well.

@justinkeefe3456 4 года назад

Casey Affleck all the way

@anantkhairatkar 4 года назад

Exactly thought the same thing

@govcorpwatch 3 года назад

Magnetism is an interesting topic. Here is what I have to add: Magnetism is an emergent property of the electric field. The search for "monopoles" is insanity. The Magnetic "force" is literally just a CHANGE in the electric field (eg, changing positions of an electric charge) propagating at the speed of light! As such, "magnetism" is not a REAL force... it is a derivative/emergent property of the electric field. All physics equations must be rewritten in an electric field and not the "magnetic field" because magnetism is derivative of the electric field. There is no such thing as "magnetism" as a fundamental force. LOL. It is all an electric effect. When an electric field changes, everything around it must change their charges to equalize their electric connection. That change in the electric field propagates at the speed of light, and literally LOOKS like magnetism, but is not. See other videos on how relativity creates the electric force to look like magnetism due to the relativistic speed of the electric particles moving. How much money, time, and human thought is being wasted on looking for monopoles simply not understanding that there is no "magnetic" force?

@crashandfreeze 4 года назад

Cute. Now let's see you isolate the holes from the cheese.

@LayerByLayer3dPrints 4 года назад

@RASOLDIOS do you happen to know what is the required pre knowledge I need to understand this lecture?

@noelhughes6101 4 года назад

Or separate the holes from the Albert Hall.

@robertneighbors4091 4 года назад

Shockingly awesome talk, Flicker absolutely appears just keenly as "a colleague" of Faraday in the times of great discovery of the Royal Institution . . .

@stevetreloar6602 4 года назад

This was literally one of the most interesting things I may have ever listened to. I'm a moron, but Dirac was a genius of awesome proportions imo! Thank you for the presentation!!!!

@govcorpwatch 3 года назад

here is how "magnetism" as a "fundamental force" is incorrect: Magnetism is an emergent property of the electric field. The search for "monopoles" is insanity. The Magnetic "force" is literally just a CHANGE in the electric field (eg, changing positions of an electric charge) propagating at the speed of light! As such, "magnetism" is not a REAL force... it is a derivative/emergent property of the electric field. All physics equations must be rewritten in an electric field and not the "magnetic field" because magnetism is derivative of the electric field. There is no such thing as "magnetism" as a fundamental force. LOL. It is all an electric effect. When an electric field changes, everything around it must change their charges to equalize their electric connection. That change in the electric field propagates at the speed of light, and literally LOOKS like magnetism, but is not. See other videos on how relativity creates the electric force to look like magnetism due to the relativistic speed of the electric particles moving. How much money, time, and human thought is being wasted on looking for monopoles simply not understanding that there is no "magnetic" force?

@superscatboy 4 года назад

Not gonna lie, when I saw the thumbnail I rolled my eyes at the appearance of this guy, but he completely won me over after a few minutes. That's quite the achievement, because I am one miserable, cynical git.

@hayuseen6683 4 года назад

Not even watching him; his voice and cadence are easy on the ears though.

@q.e.d.9112 4 года назад

superscatboy Know what you mean. Thought he looked phoney but he really is the real life Dr Who!

@dogwalker666 4 года назад

@@q.e.d.9112 he looks like Dorian Grey in that costume.

@kartikkalia01 4 года назад

He could be casted as scientist in any movie or documentary.

@skeeterburke 4 года назад

Or a documentary about Russell Brand

@TheGoodContent37 4 года назад

Specially because of that bow.

@cyrusmagnus 4 года назад

Every good scientist by nature has to be an actor in order to bring the emotion inherent to the poetry of discovery that would otherwise be lost on the ignorant. To those educated in the appropriate areas, the excitement of a magnetic monopole in any capacity would be enough to carry the entire lecture.

@mjklein 4 года назад

I was thinking "The Time Machine" during the entire presentation. Bonus: He wouldn't require much coaching for the technical scenes.

@govcorpwatch 3 года назад

quack science. The search for "monopoles" is insanity. The Magnetic "force" is literally just a CHANGE in the electric field (eg, changing positions of an electric charge) propagating at the speed of light! As such, "magnetism" is not a REAL force... it is a derivative of the electric field. All physics equations must be rewritten in an electric field and not the "magnetic field" because magnetism is derivative of the electric field. There is no such thing as "magnetism" as a fundamental force. LOL. It is all an electric effect. When an electric field changes, everything around it must change their charges to equalize their electric connection. That change in the electric field propagates at the speed of light, and literally LOOKS like magnetism, but is not. See other videos on how relativity creates the electric force to look like magnetism due to the relativistic speed of the electric particles moving. How much money, time, and human thought is being wasted on looking for monopoles simply not understanding that there is no "magnetic" force?

@beachcomber2008 Год назад

What an excellent lecture. Thanks very much.

@davemakesstuff5828 4 года назад

"Isn't that exciting?" Pause. Wow, actually yes, yes it really is.

@fabiodellorto1288 4 года назад

The way his face lit up when he said that shows his love for physics

@govcorpwatch 3 года назад

Magnetism is not as exciting as it's being made out to be. Magnetism is an emergent property of the electric field. The search for "monopoles" is insanity. The Magnetic "force" is literally just a CHANGE in the electric field (eg, changing positions of an electric charge) propagating at the speed of light! As such, "magnetism" is not a REAL force... it is a derivative/emergent property of the electric field. All physics equations must be rewritten in an electric field and not the "magnetic field" because magnetism is derivative of the electric field. There is no such thing as "magnetism" as a fundamental force. LOL. It is all an electric effect. When an electric field changes, everything around it must change their charges to equalize their electric connection. That change in the electric field propagates at the speed of light, and literally LOOKS like magnetism, but is not. See other videos on how relativity creates the electric force to look like magnetism due to the relativistic speed of the electric particles moving. How much money, time, and human thought is being wasted on looking for monopoles simply not understanding that there is no "magnetic" force?

@Agnes135 4 года назад

Oh my god, he looks like James Franco playing Tommy Wisaeu in The Disaster Artist, lmaoo

@ZOSOqueen 3 года назад

Cannot unsee

@Tom_Quixote 4 года назад

"The magnetic field of a single atom is called its spin". Wow. I've been reading so much about this stuff and nobody ever told me that spin was just another word for an atom's magnetic field.

@Sarsanoa 4 года назад

I think it's a bit of an oversimplification. To my understanding, spin is a particle's inherent angular momentum, and charged particles with angular momentum produce a magnetic field.

@moladiver6817 4 года назад

Exactly. I believe the magnetic field is a result of spin. Perhaps even rightly called an emergent property of spin. Spin on itself is a more fundamental property that I still find hard to understand myself.

@bengoodwin2141 4 года назад

Quixote it’s not exactly correct, spin is an intrinsic property related to angular momentum, and magnetic fields are created by things with electric charge and spin

@MatthijsvanDuin 4 года назад

@@bengoodwin2141 It's worth mentioning that the magnetic moment of a neutron, despite having no electric charge, is almost as large as that of a proton.

@uzefulvideos3440 4 года назад

"Spin" as a particle property is something different, which I guess is the context in which you heard it the most.

@grindsushigrind 4 года назад

19:23 and suddenly, "There is no spoon" makes so much more sense xD

@permanentvisitor2460 4 года назад

I was absolutely thrilled to discover The Royal Institution's channel and the fantastic lectures on it.

@iCuMlOuD 4 года назад

The only problem with these "monopoles" he mentioned in Spinice is that they aren't true monopoles. True monopoles are yet to be discovered.

@kubetail12 4 года назад

But mimicking one could still be useful to science and technology.

@Garbaz 4 года назад

Beside existing in a material and not in a vacuum, they aren't any less of a monopole than an electron. For every electron in the universe, you have somewhere a proton (or positron) of equal but opposite electric charge, so the total electric charge of the universe is zero. The magnetic monopoles in a spinice are the same, with the caveat of their universe being the little chunk of spinice. What makes a monopole a monopole, is that you can separate a pair of opposing particles (positive-negative / north-south) as far from each other as you want (inside their universe). The problem of course is that we humans don't exist in a universe of spinice, but a vaccum one, so there still is no way to have a monopole we can hold in our hand (while leaving the opposing pole at home). But importantly, for a lot of applications, in what sort of universe you build them does not matter for the end result, so for an physics and engineering perspective, these magnetic monopoles are very much real.

@dianespears6057 4 года назад

This was so well presented by Felix Flicker. I have now discovered a new channel from the RI to binge ! Thank you, RI, for bringing science presentations to the larger world in engaging ways for people to try to follow.

@offwiththefairiesforever2373 2 года назад

Trying , lol

@thedutchflamingo9973 4 года назад

Hold up, at 43:28, it actually sounds to me like the average frequency suddenly rises by a lot, are my ears bad or what's going on?

@michalpecz9433 4 года назад

i got the exact same feeling

@ffggddss 4 года назад

@@michalpecz9433 Ditto here! Fred

@milantrcka121 4 года назад

Seems that the order of events got swapped.. no?

@fileswappiness5045 4 года назад

Is there any character that Daniel Day Lewis can't play?!? Bravo

@keithmcgarrigle2653 Год назад

I think there are mono poles the proton being one? (Positive charged). Then the electron being another? (Negatively charged). When they recombine they would form a dipole under the right conditions? Just a thought.

@aleratz Год назад

Yes but those are electric charges. The magnetic charge is generated by the movement of an electric charge. The two are intimately related but not the same

@keithmcgarrigle2653 Год назад

@@aleratz Hi Kalko. When protons, and electrons recombine in an electric field, then become a dipole? Best regards Keith.

@dogdooish Год назад

Bravo, Felix! keep on keeping on! :)

@value8035 4 года назад

Stack many magnets to make a sphere. All north poles to the external surface of the sphere and all south poles to the inside of the sphere. Except you apparently you cannot do that for some reason, so said the Faraday.. :'(

@jwadaow 4 года назад

Its because all of the south poles inside the sphere repulse one another. Also the field lines can't converge.

@StefanNoack 4 года назад

You can do that, but the field will cancel out completely, so said this guy: ∰

@value8035 4 года назад

@@jwadaow Yes, in a perfect theoretical world, it is impossible to converge so called 'field lines'. But what makes it impossible to make in a perfectly practical world?

@value8035 4 года назад

@@StefanNoack ∰ ooo.. seems familiar. I know its advanced level physics. And I am just messing around with you all. :D The field is a theoretical construct. But I wonder what keeps us from making something like that practically in physical world.? Would that count as an engineering marvel to build a perfectly balanced assembly of magnets so that so called 'field lines' are not 'leaking out'? And also, you can bring a very strong south pole near our our spherical north pole so that it doesn't 'feel lonely'.. :p

@istvansipos9940 4 года назад

when he answers questions I did not know I had... Brilliant + he is a great presenter

@govcorpwatch 3 года назад

He is making MASSIVE presumptions about the "magnetic" force that aren't true nor real: Magnetism is an emergent property of the electric field. The search for "monopoles" is insanity. The Magnetic "force" is literally just a CHANGE in the electric field (eg, changing positions of an electric charge) propagating at the speed of light! As such, "magnetism" is not a REAL force... it is a derivative/emergent property of the electric field. All physics equations must be rewritten in an electric field and not the "magnetic field" because magnetism is derivative of the electric field. There is no such thing as "magnetism" as a fundamental force. LOL. It is all an electric effect. When an electric field changes, everything around it must change their charges to equalize their electric connection. That change in the electric field propagates at the speed of light, and literally LOOKS like magnetism, but is not. See other videos on how relativity creates the electric force to look like magnetism due to the relativistic speed of the electric particles moving. How much money, time, and human thought is being wasted on looking for monopoles simply not understanding that there is no "magnetic" force?

@grg121344 4 года назад

"fundamental" and "emergent" phenomena - phononos make lot more sense now :) Wonderful lecture.

@govcorpwatch 3 года назад

The search for "monopoles" is insanity. The Magnetic "force" is literally just a CHANGE in the electric field (eg, changing positions of an electric charge) propagating at the speed of light! As such, "magnetism" is not a REAL force... it is a derivative/emergent property of the fundamental electric field. All physics equations must be rewritten in an electric field and not the "magnetic field" because magnetism is derivative of the electric field. There is no such thing as "magnetism" as a fundamental force. LOL. It is all an electric effect. When an electric field changes, everything around it must change their charges to equalize their electric connection. That change in the electric field propagates at the speed of light, and literally LOOKS like magnetism, but is not. See other videos on how relativity creates the electric force to look like magnetism due to the relativistic speed of the electric particles moving. How much money, time, and human thought is being wasted on looking for monopoles simply not understanding that there is no "magnetic" force?

@grg121344 3 года назад

@@govcorpwatch looking for magnetic monopoles may be futile - but not insane. Looking for things that SHOULD NOT exist is a great way to check if your theories are correct. For example - you may have theory (hypothesis?) that all crows are black, it's looks quite strong since there are milions of black crows - but one white crow will instantly overthrow it. (sorry if double post - RU-vid had some issues)

@govcorpwatch 3 года назад

@@grg121344 np. I say its insane because there physically CANNOT be monopoles given that the magnetic force is LITERALLY a derivative of the electric field. Insane, because it is physically impossible. Only people who don't get this relationship think than monopoles are somehow "real" or "possible" or worth "searching for".

@grg121344 3 года назад

@@govcorpwatch - Newtons grawity theory is so pracise you can locate a planet just by looking at movement of other plantes. I guess it was quite a shock when it was discovered that movement of Marcury dosent quite match Newtons law predictions... Thats why i think looking for something that should not exist is worthwile. Cause every "law" we know is just a model of reality - and models have limited use. Sometimes they break when things get very large (and astrophysicists start inventing things like dark matter), sometimes when things get very small or very fast. Maybe magnetic monopoles do not exist - and Gauss law holds in every situation, in every scale. Or (please consider that im not a physicist and following sentence is plain gibberisch) at very small scale they exist - and we cannot observe them because universe is way to cold now. Maybe electric charges in reality do not exist - and what we perceive as electrons is just a bunch of magnetic monopoles rotating in a very strange way :)

@wingsandstache 4 года назад

I must say, this was a very good talk. I feel I learned more watching this than I did in all of my physics 2 class.

@davidmckuhen8766 3 года назад

Seems like monopoles only exist in Time...

@deusexaethera 4 года назад

TL;DR: The reason you can't have magnetic monopoles is because magnetic fields are not a fundamental force. Magnetic fields are produced by electrons moving in cyclic paths. Electrons moving in one direction must always eventually circle around and move in the other direction again, and that motion in one direction and then the other produces magnets that have two poles. A magnetic monopole would require electrons to move in one direction forever, which is impossible.

@naphackDT 4 года назад

@jocaguz18 It's not. It's the TLDR of the first minutes of the video. While a lot of the video is indeed dedicated to the idea of fundamental monopole particles, the meat of the video deals with ways to create "virtual" monopoles by flipping the mangnetic spin of atoms in a medium at temperatures below 2 kelvin and how that could be used for highly efficient computers.

@jockmoron Год назад

What a lovely man, he projects knowledge and humility in equal order. I loved his outfit - didn't he fit the part? A profoundly difficult physics concept was brought to earth as well as anything can to an informed but non-specialist audience. Not a single mathematical equation in the lecture, yet profoundly difficult mathematics must underly every bit of this work. Skating over the surface of the frozen lake of science, we were allowed to see the wide horizon, yet knowing the depth of understanding that must lie below to those who have taken the time to learn. .

@beachcomber2008 Год назад

Yep.

@Nebucatnetzer 4 года назад

Great talk, loved the theme and the level was just perfect for someone who has no experience with the topic.

@govcorpwatch 3 года назад

I did not like this talk. The search for "monopoles" is insanity. The Magnetic "force" is literally just a CHANGE in the electric field (eg, changing positions of an electric charge) propagating at the speed of light! As such, "magnetism" is not a REAL force... it is a derivative of the electric field. All physics equations must be rewritten in an electric field and not the "magnetic field" because magnetism is derivative of the electric field. There is no such thing as "magnetism" as a fundamental force. LOL. It is all an electric effect. When an electric field changes, everything around it must change their charges to equalize their electric connection. That change in the electric field propagates at the speed of light, and literally LOOKS like magnetism, but is not. See other videos on how relativity creates the electric force to look like magnetism due to the relativistic speed of the electric particles moving. How much money, time, and human thought is being wasted on looking for monopoles simply not understanding that there is no "magnetic" force?

@Volvith 4 года назад

This gent: "Today we'll be talking about magnetic monopoles..." Me: "BACK IN MY DAY WE WERE OF THE UNDERSTANDING THAT MAGNETIC MONOPOLES WERE A SCIENTIFIC IMPOSSIBILITY, AND A PARADOX. WHAT IS THIS NONSENSE?!" ... _Goddamnit, now i feel old... :I_ EDIT: Correction, they're still very much impossible. In typical theoretical physics fashion (jk i love you guys), they've simply redefined the definition of a commonly understood impossibility to such an extent to make it technically possible. :P They're still very much magnetic di-poles... just, now they're also mono-poles. :D _I love physics._

@deborahnorris4613 4 года назад

Exactly my thoughts, too! Diapoles 😁 Who knew? 🤭 I feel just as old as you, in this moment 🤣

@michaelhey4039 4 года назад

I enjoyed this presentation, but something is missing. Mr. Flicker alludes to similarities between electric phenomena and magnetic phenomena. He suggests that the existence of magnetic monopoles would improve the symmetry between our theories about electricity and magnetism. The problem is that physics has long been dishonest about how little we understand magnetism. Magnets work tirelessly against opposing forces without losing their strength or consuming energy. Spinning magnets can create tremendous lift and defy gravity. We know some things about magnetics - we can measure magnetic fields and describe them in terms of domains and spin - and yet if we are honest we have to admit that we know virtually nothing about what magnetism actually is. Magnetic phenomena are similar to quantum ones - we can sense that to allow for the understanding that such phenomena suggest will ultimately overturn much of what we hold to be true.

@ProfessorEGadd 4 года назад

We know as little about magnetism as we know about charge. Tell me, why don't electrons wear out? How do they keep their charge without being supplied with energy. People can't answer these questions either but for some reason magnetism is percieved to be mysterious while charge is taken for granted.

@feraudyh 4 года назад

When I was a student Paul Dirac came to our university to talk to us about magnetic monopoles, which were just an object of speculation.

@BobWidlefish 4 года назад

Still are.

@beachboardfan9544 4 года назад

Wooo so glad you guys re-uploaded this, thought I missed it when the last one disappeared!

@lorenzocoluccia8002 4 года назад

i can hear a lot of people coughing, i hope that wasn't covid

@jefff6007 4 года назад

it was mid February 2020, so it is possible....

@vishank7 4 года назад

Such a beautiful lecture! Absolutely loved it. I hope to give a science talk in the same 19th century way one day!😄💎

@mayursatav7182 3 года назад

Hey sir, this talk surely magnetrified my interest in Magnetic monopole. Hope the expedition reaches some monumental breakthroughs in near future

@petermyerscello 4 года назад

Is he the new Defense Against the Dark Arts teacher?

@GrandmastaKash 4 года назад

Nice . I was wondering why the hippie hair AND bespoke bow tie. But magnets have no poles just spin he’s right. I heard it months ago though while looking up Tesla’s wireless energy concept... Tesla said that the rotating magnetic field was his greatest discovery. The torus!

@tooba6290 4 года назад

The torus.. if that means toroid then magnetic field inside it is constant

@Bldyiii 4 года назад

I’m just happy he didn’t play the “Brown Noise”

@joshhernandez6228 4 года назад

@1Energine1 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brownian_noise

@YellowGoddess 4 года назад

@ what does the "brown note" have to do with LGBTQ?

@koktszfung 4 года назад

@@YellowGoddess he is posting comment about LGBTQ everywhere, just ignore him

@Bldyiii 4 года назад

Guys, the “Brown Note” is a poop joke. Please, let’s keep our humor juvenile, not political.

@benjaminhoover6427 4 года назад

Hahahaa!! "That's an octopus, but it looked nicer."

@yawasar 3 года назад

Magnetic Monopole Copyright 2020 Wardell Lindsay Planck's Constant h=Mq M=Wb/2P Magnetic Quanta q=4C/3X=25e/3=(13U1d) Electric Quanta h=4C/3X Wb/2P=2CWb/3XP M=Wb/2P monopole q=25e/3 quark z=M/q=375 Wb/C=375 Ohm

@GerardVaughan-qe7ml 4 года назад

To have direction you have to have at least two points, makes no difference how small !!! And it IS true that to make an Electric field, you can move relative to a magnetic field. I.e. Loop integral of E.dl = d/dt of surface integral of B (magnetic flux density).da

@serra_edoardo 4 года назад

Take a moment to look at his left cufflink, then at his right one. That's genius.

@rorschacht8478 4 года назад

What's a cufflink?

@serra_edoardo 4 года назад

@@rorschacht8478 the thing that holds together the two pieces of this particular type of shirt cuff.

@andrerodon3921 3 года назад

next time add a time reference - this lecture is almost an hour...

@serra_edoardo 3 года назад

@@andrerodon3921 There's not a precise time reference, I've just noticed it while watching.

@Dranok1 3 года назад

@@serra_edoardo Yeah, but lots of us are watching on a tiny phone screen. Please give us a clue!

@alxomnm 4 года назад

Just wow!! much better than reading a paper. Thank you:)

@ambiguity9518 4 года назад

Wish I could be in London to watch these lectures. Amazing watch, thank you!

@FOeffinMR 2 месяца назад

Yes… Yes, this is EXACTLY how I want my magnetic monopole lecturer to dress and sound. I’m thoroughly satisfied with this.

@REMY.C. 3 года назад

@ Felix Flicker Doctor, you really are complicating things. A lecture of one hour to tell us that you theoretically went to the north pole and found nothing while a five years old child can just practically go to Amazon and find thousands and thousands of monopods of all sizes and shapes. I just don't understand those PhD in theoretical research.

@loczaczix 4 года назад

Uploaded on 20th of May and a guy in the audience coughing? Hmm

@beamer.electronics 4 года назад

Maybe it's somebody who thinks this is: "Who Wants To Be A Millionaire" ;)

@MilesPrower69420 4 года назад

it was from febuary, and i timestamped all the coughing, there was alot

@PieterPatrick 4 года назад

Great quality, thanks for this upload. This will get millions of views for sure! ...Darn, I forgot, this is science. :-/

@nottelling6598 3 года назад

The camera and lighting teams have done amazing work, as did the editors. The close-up shots look amazing...

@TheRoyalInstitution 3 года назад

Thank you, that's very kind of you to say. We do miss our lecture theatre very much at the moment, and wish we could make our current talks as beautiful as they used to be.

@georgewashington90 3 года назад

Hi MR. you asked what happen if you cut magnetic atom at half. That is my answer. In general you will not be capable to cut magnetic atom at half - only to approximation of half. If you cut atom that has magnetic properties to approximation at half one approximation will have magnetic properties the second will not.

@karlstenator 4 года назад

Enjoyed listening to this. Just had a brainwave whilst mashing potatoes - maybe "non-magnetic" ordinary matter is mono? ... I'll keep mashing them spuds. Thanks for the talk!

@parsonsenergy Год назад

20 years ago when strong permanent magnets were almost ubiquitous .. That availability allowed neophytes to do their own monopole experiments which ended up with a dipole configuration of magnets that produced a pseudo monopole or a more northern or southern polar intensity.. as explained in this discussion.. it would be nice to have a discussion about the physics and practicality of a homopolar generator and if such a generator would be more or less efficient… Thank you for this discussion…

@johnsmoak8237 Год назад

After my second time watching through I think the answer to your ultimate question may be: yes, fusion is practically more efficient than fission.

@DrHarryT Год назад

In an electrical generator both poles are used to generate an AC current.

@fuzzylogic33 Год назад

Yes, but the practicality is to use less energy, fusion uses lots more over a short space, new elements have since been created 2023 that should use less energy to create monopole, maybe with spin ice or without.

@johnsmoak8237 Год назад

@FuZZy LoGiC Uk I discovered a newly named element this morning in an experiment, working on publishing the discovery soon. The element I discovered exhibits this property of magnetic monopolarity and is also a fusion upon observation. I call it Urium, 0, or The Halogen and I'd love to discuss it further in a non-youtube comment medium lol

@fuzzylogic33 Год назад

@@johnsmoak8237 ah, you should have a talk with my colleague (Dr Eisuke Matsuda (Yamagata) about your find.

@0ned 4 года назад

Goo' joob! Who was Tesla without Faraday? Same to James Clerk Maxwell!

@Corpsegrinderr 4 года назад

With channels like this, there really is no excuse for ignorance. Rock on you guys

@theinbredarmy512 4 года назад

HOLY FUCK! This video is from an alternate timeline of Power Rangers. Where Jason David Frank (Tommy), never becomes a ranger.. Looks so much alike wow!

@Xeno_Bardock Год назад

Monopoles are myth. Gravity is also not a monopole. You can get something close to a monopole by arranging magnets in a spherical configuration where one pole points at center and other pole points everywhere, like the poles of gravity, but not the monopole by itself. Gravity, electricity and magnetism are all result of matter and spacetime/ether interacting with each other in various ways.

@konstantinsarychev9305 4 года назад

The presentation was amazing! But after the end of the video I found myself with a feeling that nothing has been said. Strange!

@MattiaPrometeo 4 года назад

This lecture got STYLE!

@rca168 4 года назад

43:42 "Or so we think" thank you for taking that risk and being so scientific

@govcorpwatch 3 года назад

Magnetism is being treated as "or so we think"... here is how that thinking is incorrect: Magnetism is an emergent property of the electric field. The search for "monopoles" is insanity. The Magnetic "force" is literally just a CHANGE in the electric field (eg, changing positions of an electric charge) propagating at the speed of light! As such, "magnetism" is not a REAL force... it is a derivative/emergent property of the electric field. All physics equations must be rewritten in an electric field and not the "magnetic field" because magnetism is derivative of the electric field. There is no such thing as "magnetism" as a fundamental force. LOL. It is all an electric effect. When an electric field changes, everything around it must change their charges to equalize their electric connection. That change in the electric field propagates at the speed of light, and literally LOOKS like magnetism, but is not. See other videos on how relativity creates the electric force to look like magnetism due to the relativistic speed of the electric particles moving. How much money, time, and human thought is being wasted on looking for monopoles simply not understanding that there is no "magnetic" force?

@bethechange4934 4 года назад

A mono-pole, or even nearly so, magnet would be the missing ingredient in perpetually running motors. A mono-pole installed in a simple Perendev configuration would do it nicely. Whoever figures out how to make a monopole either naturally or through shielding, will have the key to unlimited free energy.

@anthonymoses3697 3 года назад

So if we're trying to find out if magnetic monopoles exist, how on Earth can this guy tell us so definitively that if you were to run a magnetic monopole thru a wire coil that it would produce a persistent current in said wire? He very quickly states this as if it were a proven fact and moves right along, yet gives no evidence to support this claim. I want to see the evidence for this. Edit: 12:40 is the rough timestamp for those interested.

@kinsley2108 4 года назад

Still needs more tweed...

@jamesdriscoll9405 4 года назад

And a better squid

@w1ck3dz0d1ac 4 года назад

My friend said he looks like a British version of Doctor Tommy Oliver and now I can't unsee it.

@Elric509 4 года назад

He looks like a British Chuck Shuldiner to me tbh

@swadeshtaneja3512 3 года назад

Thank you for showing Faraday’s record and lighting bulb equipment made by graduate students Jeff

@hqyangyang 4 года назад

I don’t think the traditional electric-magnetic theory is perfect, check David LaPoint’s primer field theory, all these arguments will automatically disappear!

@anthonypace5354 4 года назад

I'm curious, if you have a monopole, with (forgive my terminology) no bound opposite/anti-particle, than would it not have either no resistance, or on end up binding? thus, either Infinite momentum, or infinite stability respectively?

@govcorpwatch 3 года назад

there are no monopoles. the relationship between the electric field and "magnetic force" is not properly encoded by this dude.... here is the proper relationship: Magnetism is an emergent property of the electric field. The search for "monopoles" is insanity. The Magnetic "force" is literally just a CHANGE in the electric field (eg, changing positions of an electric charge) propagating at the speed of light! As such, "magnetism" is not a REAL force... it is a derivative/emergent property of the electric field that then feeds back into the electric field. All physics equations must be rewritten in an electric field and not the "magnetic field" because magnetism is derivative of the electric field. There is no such thing as "magnetism" as a fundamental force. LOL. It is all an electric effect. When an electric field changes, everything around it must change their charges to equalize their electric connection. That change in the electric field propagates at the speed of light, and literally LOOKS like a magnetic field, but is not. See other videos on how relativity creates the electric force to look like magnetism due to the relativistic speed of the electric particles moving. How much money, time, and human thought is being wasted on looking for monopoles simply not understanding that there is no "magnetic" force?

@biteman167 Год назад

It creates a kinetic force/energy, right? I’m confused on how there is no way to harness the constant force. I’m not very knowledgeable, but it seems like a constant kinetic force should be able to create a positive energy somehow. I know it’s a rabbit hole many have devoted their lives to, but it has to be possible. I want to believe! Haha