I don't know if u seen my other comments on ur other videos. There are some questions I would love u to answer. Thanks sm Nathan❤️ ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-7m9X2ze1zSY.html This one I left a question on, would love u if u answered it
I'd pre shuffle the 2,8 And Q before placing into the middle ... I'm wondering if it would help or hinder if 2 short cards (duplicate aces, 2s? Or ace and joker?) were placed 1/4 and 3/4 down so if they CUT too shallow/deep to pick one of the 12 middle cards , odds are they'll get the short card and you can predict an "Ace of...". ..' I thought I'd Ace that trick.. or I joker around too much". Just an idea....
Sure that’s definitely an idea, although you might be overthinking a little too much. Spectators really aren’t going to pay any mind to the piles you give them to shuffle, especially if you haven’t even told them what the trick is about yet, why would they insist they cut the cards themselves? Psychologically, if you act like it doesn’t matter, then the spectators should have the same mindset. Watch Dani Daortiz, he gives out piles all the time, sometimes the pile consists of only 3 cards (for method reasons) and the spectators don’t care because he doesn’t either.
@@AMillionCardTricks I was referring to the single cut in the middle... not the 3 piles. I.e when you say cut somewhere in the middle if they go shallow or deep they get one short card... I Edited the idea for clarity....this is giving me some ideas... Thx!!!
I get what you’re saying. In the tutorial I provide a line to justify this saying that I could have seen the cards on top/bottom so cutting from the middle would be the “most fair.” I feel that from experience, most people assume that we might have control over the top/bottom of the deck, but rarely assume that we have control over the middle. So it seems fair enough to them, especially after the elaborate shuffles.