Pregnancy is painful but beautiful. Just had my first and it was life threatening but I still wouldn’t change anything. I came out the other side with new perspective and appreciation for all the women before me. Convenience is overtaking everything in our world and we are losing what makes us human. No wonder we have so many mental issues if this is in our future. Hope this doesn’t come to pass. The communication your body has with your baby during labor helps you to bond - it can’t be replicated.
@@ozymandiasultor9480 Um, where have you been for the past 26 years of film history? Dozens of roles, an Academy Award nomination, also a director and writer. Puhleeze.
Dreams can show us messages from people we love and know. People can have dreams of the future and they are our minds telling us somethjng important. They are meant for analysis.
It isn't there because his name doesn't get searched as often as hers. The title of the video is deliberately created to have keywords that bring the trailer to people's feed, and hopefully they will click and view the video. Her name as a keyword generates views and clicks because it is more known; his name really doesn't, because as good and respected an actor as he is, his name isn't nearly as known.
Why aren’t adopted or a Abandoned or foster care or orphaned (all same thing really) ever included in the conversations about this kind of stuff including antiabortion or pro choice?
I hear foster children brought up in almost every pro-life/pro-choice argument or debate I've ever heard. Generally the pro-choice side says adoption is not a good alternative to abortion because there's already so many foster kids. The pro-life side usually responds that there are way more people on the waiting list to adopt babies than there are available babies and they don't think abortion has anything to do with children who (largely) need temporary housing while waiting for whatever situation with their parents/family gets resolved. I'm not looking to debate this topic, just giving my two cents that I have heard this brought up countless times, as I spend a lot of time listening to both sides speak.
I was abandoned then adopted. I have talked to countless adoptees. My point was that we, the abandoned and sometimes adopted children or adults are barely ever asked for our opinions which are based on actual lived experiences. Instead the stories are always told from the would be parents points of view. Why is this? Why are we left out of this important debate?
@@fireflymary9269 Obviously this is just my opinion and I'm not saying it's right either. But I believe you hear more from the adoptive parents prospective vs adopted children or the birth parents' perspective is for a couple of reasons. My first belief is that when a child is adopted by a family it's framed as a joyous event in our society. And I do believe it's joyous, but I also understand and want to acknowledge that every adoption is born from great, tragic loss. But our society and culture doesn't always want to acknowledge the truths that are complicated and sorrowful. It's easier for others outside the nuclear family to just focus on the positive of the event and therefore really acknowledging the adoptive parents prospective and actions and not so much that of the child's and their loss and experience. The second reason I believe we usually only hear from the adoptive parents perspective is because most children at the time of adoption are too young or the experience of losing their birth family and being adopted is too recent to really fully understand and clearly communicate to others their story. Obviously older teens would have a better advantage of telling their story vs a 5 year old, but still, as a 30+ old myself, I believe we need to be into our 20's to fully process our own childhood, especially if it was filled with complications, loss, or abuse. Lastly, I believe that these older adopted children who are now in their 20's and older may not want to be a poster child for adoption. If that makes sense? They maybe don't want to relive their past and just move forward with their future. Again, this is just my theory. And side note, I am an adoptive parent. We adopted our 5 year old son from foster care. He has been with us since he was 14 months old. I hope my son will feel comfortable enough one day to share his story with those who will be respectful and listen to what he wants to share. I do hope we hear more from adoptive children as they become adults and can reflect back and share what they willing.
@@ca147 I appreciate your well thought out response and the time you took to write it. Im 63 now. I found out by accident I am adopted when I was about 11 and not in a good way. It traumatized my younger brother and I believe caused his brain to change and he later committed suicide at 35. I belong to a support group. I did DNA testing and found my bio relatives in my 50s. It’s been an interesting journey and mostly Im ok with it but I definitely experience abandonment and attachment issues which have had a lifelong impact on my life and mental well being. Adopted children are over represented in addiction clinics and with mental health care problems. A so called friend recently shamed me when I shared some of my feelings on the issue stating “I should be grateful someone wanted me instead of” other feelings and questions Im exploring I trusted her to share with. I dumped her as a friend. After a lifetime of hard crap Im unwilling at this stage of my life to put up with mediocre friends or people in my life anymore. Mostly, from the time I found out well into my adulthood, I had zero desire to know anything of my history. But a biological sister found me when I was in my thirties. That was a strange experience which faded away until I was in my 50s and decided to do 23 and me genetic testing. Finding and meeting relatives was a mixed bag experience and though Im glad I braved the quest, Im most happy to discover some facts about my actual ethnicity and to know I got the much better father after learning of my bio dad. I wish my adoptive father had lived long enough for me to tell him how much I loved him and am grateful for him in my life. He died by the time I was 30 and began being sick when I was 25. He was born in 1918 so part of the silent Gen. We didn’t talk. I regret that.
it doesn't sound like a bad idea. It could be a second choice for those who don't want or can't go through the pains and riks of pregnancy and childbirth (remember a lot of people can't physically go through it, are more propense to misscaries, have health conditions or are just really scared)
@@Leiloni What you described is a lot more ethically questionable. I think it puts a huge, life-long burden on the hosting mom and should be reserved only for couples who truly cannot have a child in any other way. Personally, I know a couple who did it just because the woman didn't want to ruin her model-like body (and she is not even earning money this way). I cannot look at her as a real mother, especially thinking about all the other women who cannot carry a child of their own but cannot afford a surrogate mother either. Pods, however, are impersonal and with the potential to be equally accessible to everyone. I would pick one instead of the horrendous pregnancy I had any time.
Yeah... it usually looks like this in the beginning, the idea behind a concept is beautiful - meant to help people who need it. But in practice it's often inaccessible to the underpriviledged and so, only the affluent can use it, so it becomes a luxury item/service. I'm thinking weightloss medication - it was supposed to help people in need, but now there's a shortage because of rich people who want to lose 5 kg without putting in any work. The idea of pod babies is terrifying to me 😅
Its scary because we have so many children and babies suffering in this world(abusive parents, trafficking etcetcetc.) And then they want to create another baby farm...makes me sick to my stomach! JUST WHY?! Humans only know how to create more problems. It's depressing. The future is dark. It is coming of an antichrist. Pray for Jesus Christ.
For the future those ideas are quite trends and fashion more than something that will last - eggs are just morphological and metaphorical more than sustainable ideas. Or humans are just repetitives that claim nuance.
Um...they kids don't dream? Get ready for a generation of complete psychos on the loose (the kind that burns the house down with the parents locked in it).
Oh gosh it looks great but why did Clarke's character have to be American when she clearly struggles with the accent? It's not impossible that an English couple could emigrate. I just find it so distracting in a movie when an accent sounds wrong.
Life is continuous. Life can not come from dead or inorganic thongs. The sperm cell and ovum are both alive. That doesn't make it a human with rights that supercede the rights of the person carrying it.
I sort of adore how this is actually based on science being developed in this present moment. It's a film being used to get us acclimatized to the future and I really admire that. I say that very seldom about any sort of Hollywood anything. I have no idea the premise of this plot so I'm not certain how the outcome will be. However, I know for a fact this is just preparing us for what will be a reality one day and likely just some ten to twenty years in the future and maybe even sooner or it will be likely straight-up AI carrying a human baby for humans. Humanity as a whole is having a harder and harder time procreating. It's a mixture of what we have done to ourselves and the environment. Even though it seems like our population is huge. It's actually declining quickly and it's getting harder for even a young healthy person to carry a child. I really enjoy the thought that a generation of children could grow up without any biological impact from their parent's environment. Plastics, chemicals, gmo in foods. I dunno I think this is sort of wicked awesome cool and I do love the future is female feel to the story line
That's one way of looking at it, but, it makes more sense that this is about the future for an immoral, self-absorbed generation that blames science for their selfish and short-sighted choices. Science does not excuse anyone from their choices and actions. For example: guns don't kill people, it is the choice of the person to use the gun. The success of humanity thus far, has been down to those who can make sacrifices. Being a parent is about commitment, limiting one's freedom, and self-sacrifice. It's hard, and it's easy to avoid. Too many woman find out too late what's important in life. They try too have kids too late, or they cover up the pain of regret. Too late they realise that careers or endless freedom and pleasure are vacuous pursuits. Achieving excellence and reducing suffering is about intelligent sacrifice. Making one's life purposeful is about intelligent sacrifice. A self-absorbed and entitled generation will collapse into decline and be replaced by those who don't get brainwashed by false narratives. Creating babies is easy and pleasurable. Raising families that can be a force for good... that takes maturity and intelligent sacrifice -- and that is what true love is.
I kinda love the idea of having a baby without the aid of a man. As someone who is trying to have a baby via sperm donor, t's fucking difficult when men are so unreliable even in the act of jerking off into a pot.
i think Rachel's disconnect shows how much of a blessing it is to carry your child to be able to bond with him/her; Once again, God, the master planner/architect strikes again!
Its funny because its showing all these super radical fems what future will mostly look like if "we dont need men for pregnancy" is achieved in reality. Because once its monetized and implemented having children wont be anyones choice anymore lol
