Removal tool is amazing, it does the job in few seconds, wow!. I used previous version before Neo and it was cool i liked it, but NEO, i think, is way more advanced. Thanks for video.
Hello John, Many thanks for your great videos and valuable tips. I have also experimented with Luminar Neo when I need something quick and dirty. In the meantime, however, I have switched to Radiant Photo for these tasks. I would be very interested to know whether you will also be fascinated by it. Once you have loaded your images into the program, they are already processed!
I think it's definitely worth checking out. While it doesn't have all of the features that Neo has, for portrait retouching it gives you a lot more control. It handles skin amazingly well, is super fast and has some pretty great tools. The only downside is that it's credit based so is more expensive for editing large volumes of images. That being said, I think it's worth it.
Honestly you don't need any more to brinizer method any more, you just need to shoot in a telephoto lens like the 135mm 1.8 and then go to photoshop in generate, simpleeeee
I meeeaaaannnnn. I might have to try that out actually. But at the end of the day having an authentic area is a little bit better than generating everything IMO.
Once I finished lightroom editing, if I jump into photoshop then I couldn't do any adjustments in lightroom. I think it's a good way using Luminar to solve this problem.🤔
So it doesn't matter what kind of photographer you are, but it matters how you know how to work in a photo processing program. These are today's professional photographers😂
Tools are tools. Using tools to enhance your photos doesn't make you any less of a "professional photographer". The photo has to be good in the first place as well. You can only really do but so much in post.
Removal tool and more convincing stitching is one thing, but fundamentally changing the proportions of a woman's skull is a horrible thing to do. Ethically and morally irresponsible and for no reason whatsoever other than saying that you can. I would be absolutely horrified to show that edit to a client, and I would be even more horrified if my client liked it more. Just what are you saying about the way she really looks? It's even worse that it's subtle because the client might not realise you've done it. You picked these examples. So, why? The woman in the corn field. Why do you want to "take her in"? Why? Was the photo any better after you made her slimmer? No. You just changed it because you could. Talking calmly about it whilst doing it as being all matter of fact just doesn't disguise the fact that it's a horrible way to go about the representation of human beings. Imagine her looking back at her wedding photos in years to come. "Oh, look what i was like when i was younger and had a completely different shaped skull and body". Didn't do it to the groom did you. Think about that. You said you had to be "careful". Yes you do. You have to not implant the seeds of body dysmorphia! The easiest way to do that is not to fundamentally alter the way they look. This is a the AI future that I feared when it first became available. "Let's change it because it's cool". I think you've got a higher responsibility than that and this falls short. Wedding clients don't come to photographers to generate imaginative tech-led variations on how they look, they come to you to provide beautiful images of how they look on that day. Been following you for a while. This is an easy unsubcribe.
it seems all these lightroom guys are moving over to doing luminar content, been using it since alpha, its not bad just with neo the AI is crazy aggressive so less is seriously more.
