DRAFT THESE RUNNING BACKS NOW & WIN BIG play.underdogfantasy.com/p-fa... Using Promo Code: "FSE" at first deposit and signup will get you $250 in bonus cash & a FREE Square Pick Em' special Get Our Dynasty/Redraft Guides for FREE at Signup!
Productive struggle turning the corner into a young stud team with potential to produce. Went out and got JT and Jacobs to pair with Jon Brooks and some other flyers in the 24 class for what I thought were reasonable prices. Wheels up!
Just depends on the league, my competitive home league, if u don't take a rb with 2 of yoir first 3 picks , you basically missed out ... there all gone
@FantasyStockExchange yes it's highly competitive, knowing that in standard fantssy leagues rbs are a must to win is paramount , if unhave tbe best qb 2 best wrs and the 30th and 31st rbs u lost every year......like I said its about knowing your league and who plays and who does what. I've won less in that league than other paid leagues with randoms. Yes it's highly competive people wake up at 3 am to save on waivers
I was doing a Dalmatian last night and was having a great zero RB start with Jefferson, Deebo, Kupp, Kelce and Mahomes thru 5 rounds and when I missed Mixon by 1 pick I decided not to take Ken Walker in the mid 6th because I seen how you guys hated him at ADP in your show last week. You said why take Walker when you can get Swift. Well I needed both to be honest I ended up getting Swift as my RB1.......not great Bob. You guys talked me out of Walker. Fantasy Index hates Swift they have Walker as their RB 14 while Swift is their RB 35.
You could've taken Walker in round 6 but to take down big tournaments he probably needs to run really hot on big plays or Charbs needs to get hurt. I guess maybe taking a RB over Deebo may have made sense in hindsight
The WR model was built with last years chart in mind, trust me the information you got in the WR video took me literally hundreds of hours to refine, but going forward I guess I can show the chart of the analytics
Agreed with the FSE comment. Here's my take without giving an explicit answer, you do with it what you will. Packer fan here btw - so here's my take/insight. The packers backfield under Matt Lafleur has typically been a 2 back system. Sure, over the last 5ish years, you could call Jones the lead back, but it's almost always come with a running mate who takes just enough volume for it to be kind of annoying from a fantasy perspective... jamaal Williams at first, then came AJ Dillon. Neither of those two were really too too valuable, but they took enough volume for it to be annoying to Jones owners. Now, AJ dillon is still there, but his contract is literally zero risk. I however, do think AJ Dillon makes the team as RB3 and is just dirt cheap and can be involved and actually get play time. However, i do think also that the Packers know that Dillon cannot be RB1 when the starter goes down (historically, Jones). Early in his rookie season, he flashed. Since then hes been very very mediocre and arguably bad. This is why Lloyd was drafted. You keep the security blanket of Dillon for dirt cheap, zero risk, and now he's set up to be only RB3. Lloyd is now stepping in as the change of pace guy (ideally. If he's good.) with upside to be more if he is really good. The other range of outcomes is that he's athletic, but not that good, in which case, the packers get a guy now (Jacobs) who has proven to be more durable over a large sample size than Jones, and not only that, but he can take volume if need be. I see anywhere from workhorse at best, maybe JT workload, to the downside which is a 1A 1B split with Lloyd. So basically i think Jacobs downside volume, is what jones got. With higher upside. And he's more durable than Jones. And his line and overall offense will be better too, possibly leading to more efficiency than ever. I think he has untapped potential as a receiver. Sorry for the rant, hopefully the background on the roster construction provided context.
