Once I read that some less than popular judges hide under the wig a sort of metal helmet(!) to avoid being struck by some angry defendants, don't know if this was a metropolitan legend, but given the times and how harsh was english law.......🤔
@@alessiodecarolis - Interesting. But if the blow is too strong he would still feel it, though the wig would prevent an injury. The metal used for the helmet should be very thick...and quite heavy - not too comfortable to wear. Anyway...even if the blow is too strong, and the helmet heavy, it's always better than a wound. ☺
Not only judges - also lawyers in english courts carry these ridiculous remnants of the 1700s on their heads... funny how centuries-old fashion accessories find their funny little spaces to hide in.
So at 7:10, that is actually real hair pomaded and powered by RU-vidr and fashion historian Abby Cox. The woman on the left is RU-vidr and shoe historian Nicole Rudolph. While I enjoy Weird History, I'm going to go to the professionals for my historic fashion. Also, "Perruque" is the literal french translation for wig, just saying :)
The lack of research is obvious. Also, RU-vid is pretty serious about stealing other people's work, especially books. You might think slapping the word history on the label makes everything okay, but it doesn't. You can have your lame jokes to struggle with relevancy, however, that doesn't make copyright infringement disappear. And for you guys to use the hard work of others out of context? Even worse. Try reading some actual research. You know, the kind that starts with an abstract, original sources in context, or subject matter experts.
You would think you were having a bad Kava Kava trip. In some countries the indigenous people thought Spaniards were gods or ghosts especially if mounted on a horse back.
imagine a pale people, coming from where no land exists, on a vessel larger than any home you've seen, conjuring flame from various items, insane isnt the word, it would be like meeting aliens.
I can't imagine the putrid sweet smell that emanated from those wigs with the festering sores underneath them and the scented powder that they applied! 🤢🤮
@@t4squared bathing was normal….. and the reason they had clothes as the shift to wash daily. Your just getting your historic information from this seriously off video that did not do their research.
So, Weird History, why no comment about stealing pictures and erroneous information? What are you afraid of? Perhaps you should be reported for the pictures...
@@lordcumiring if I'm not mistaken, there was head lice and other insects that lived in the wigs. You had a better chance maintaining or cutting your hair instead of a wig.
@@brandonf.8360 they were used to hide the scabs on their head . The bugs were in ur hair and the wigs it was easier and less painful to boil the wig than the pic the bugs .
This entire video is garbage and anyone watching should PLEASE reference Abby Cox’s response video. Not only did Weird History utilize photos and information from Abby’s books and videos without permission or citation - but Weird History removes so much context and twists this information. This is why you can’t just watch a video from the internet and believe it to be true. Abby has spent YEARS conducting her research and writing her book on this subject. Shame on Weird History! 👏🏼
“If you read the book you stole the images from you’d know that wasn’t the case” -Abby Cox From the book “The Guide to 18th Century Beauty”. WRITTEN by Abby Cox. Abby Cox, the person Weird History stole photos from, then did not credit. The book which Weird History took the photos from but failed to read anything in the book other than “18th century” Do better Weird History. Do better.
@@MrsD1980 For fashion and hygiene and ease, the usual reasons, (since the Egyptians) it is more convenient to put on a wig and be ready in a few minutes, than to spend hours combing, curling and structuring a hairstyle every morning and then spend the rest of the day with headaches from the pullings.
I wonder how long it will take Abby Cox to file copyright infringement on these guys for using her images in their horrifyingly inaccurate and outright false "facts" video? If you're going to make crappy "history" videos with false statements and taking historical diary entries out of context, the least you could do is not use images created by somebody who put their heart and soul into their creations? Then again, it would be on brand for the creators of Weird History to outright STEAL Abby Cox's photos as if to taunt her with it for a video where they get none of the history right.
Lol sorry to break it to you bud but the large majority if not ALL youtubers use content like images and vids that aren’t theirs on their videos, even your own specified source/channel you’re telling people to visit, she has other content that doesn’t “belong” to her all over her channel lmao. it’s called creative content, and it’s used transformatively and wasn’t used to sell a product, soooo you should try to learn things about what you’re even saying LMAO 😂 you kids are literally full of cringe with how you guys turn into amateur lawyers lmao
@@Dominicn123 The thing is they stole photos from the book she wrote without her permission, and they are spreading misinformation that is completely false and garbage under the pretense that they are facts. If someone points out how someone is stealing people's work and on top of that not even spreading proper information, then at that point it's not cringe.
😂 hahaha same. At that age, I used to think that when they said people "tested make up on animals" that animals had make up put on them by professional make up artists and judging on how well they looked the products were then approved for human use 🤦♂️😂😂😂 the things we imagine as kids, honestly 😂
When will you people actually research what you're talking about? Also it doesn't make a good case if you contradict yourself through the video. If anyone wants some good research on this topic go watch Abby Cox's reaction to this. You might even find that Wierd History stole her images and took them out of context.
It’s so frustrating that almost everything in this video is wrong or taken out of context. They also made sure to steal images without crediting them. So upsetting. 🤢
For those wondering everything wrong with this video check out Abby Cox’s analyzing weird histories uncredited and out of context information. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-PIYUVHIUdfM.html
Almost everything in this video is factually incorrect, and multiple images used are stolen directly from the work of far more qualified historians. 0/10 would not recommend this channel if you are looking for actual facts
This video is riddled with lies, stolen photos, sources taken out of context and just general bad history. Please can you consult ACTUAL HISTORIANS for once!?
@Real Aiglon If you're going to present something as a fact, then it had better be an actual fact and not made up garbage from people who didn't bother to read the source material. Especially for a channel that claims to present historical information. You're obsession with defending a company that doesn't care about you is interesting though.
If you weren't alive or ever witnessed it don't say anything,just cos you watched or read a different version dont mean it's lies, someone wrote it but it doesn't make it true
@@heathersealey592 Lol ah nothing better than people that just shout that something is wrong without even being able to back up their accusations. show them what’s wrong instead of accusing
If you had bothered to read the book you stole images from by Abby Cox at certain points, maybe you would have gotten this video factually correct. A lot of this info is straight up wrong and you included a shot from Abby’s book where she’s styling someone’s REAL HAIR when talking about washing wigs?? There’s some rather inept script writers on this channel apparently.
@weirdhistory needs to STOP STEALING other people's images 7:03-7:11 these images belong to a book written by Abby Cox ... The ladies pictured are not wearing wigs at all even.
I like Abby Cox taking this video apart. Especially since the creators of this video used her book and images from it in the video and then proceeded to get pretty much everything wrong. So anyone watching this do yourself a favor and go watch that one.
For those hoping to learn something over there, it’s not a very informative video. It’s just a lot of her getting offended and freaking out. Look elsewhere if you’re actually looking to learn something about history. Can’t trust much any source these days.
@@nessamillikan6247 Abby sources her references throughout the entire video. She often pulls out of various beauty articles from the period located in archives. She’s very satirical within the video and that’s a part of her humor. There’s a lot wrong with this video(the one above) that utilizes sensationalization to keep viewers engaged. Abby has done lectures at universities on dress and fashion history. She has videos analyzing construction methods of beauty products and extant dresses from the 1800’s in her own collection. If you can get past the jokes within her video it’s very good and informative. She also utilizes a wide variety of sources from different areas other then beauty journals such as personal diaries and government documents.
@@nessamillikan6247 - I know, I just wanna hear an accurate and unbiased account of this history... she says "Christopher Columbus left Europe because he's a piece of shit" so you know where her mind is
@@nessamillikan6247 she literally wrote a whole ass book and has researched the topic for well near a decade, what are you on about? She's got every right to be upset by this, first of all, and second, she does cite sources and give factual evidence on how this video is incorrect and adds additional context.
Don't take anything about this video as actual history. Most of it is plain wrong, or self-contradictory, and the rest is plagiarized from actual 18th century fashion historians: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-PIYUVHIUdfM.html
Only the judges wear wigs, both men and women. The reason is tradition, but also to intimidate everyone in the court room. They take them off when they have to deal with children so as not to intimidate them. The intimidation is to get the accused to confess, whether to crimes he/she actually committed or not is irrelevant.
@@lookoutforchris Real criminals of course aren't intimidated by a silly wig, but innocent people and the falsely accused can find it very imtimidating to be confronted with someone that is clearly a very high up official. That's what they are hoping for - to get the falsely accused to confess to something they haven't done. That way, the courts don't have to deal with real criminals.
Most of the information (and images) from this video are from caricatures and exaggerations from the Era. The wig trend started in the reign of Louis XIII when the king started losing his hair, but it was made fashionable by the reign of Louis XIV, because the hair care of the wigs and the styling was so expensive that only nobility could wore them, so it was a mark of your social rank. Women didn't wore wigs because just like red heals, they were a men thing, so they wore simple styles most of this time. The tall hair trend it's a 1760's/1770's thing, when hairstyles became more and more complicated. The most famous example of this is the Pouf hairstyle that women of the court of Versailles wore from 1774 up to 1782 or 1783, a really short period of time, and it was nothing like the caricatures shown here, mostly it was a tall hairstyle along with hair pieces, hats or caps. Hair care also was different, but that doesn't mean they were dirty, they put pomade and powder to wash their hair dry, so the hair was clean but also moldable for the styling. For more information, search for better sources, as simply as searching Abby Cox channel.
I think, in a sense, wigs have come back in style with the amount of fake hair that people are wearing these days-wigs, weaves, extensions…..it never really left :)
They use them in the High Courts to reflect their high authority over the peasants they pass judgement upon. It's a symbol of their social status over the serfs or plebs. They also still use them for the same purpose in the House of Lords.
I feel bad for the wives back then. Their husbands would be bringing home syphilis they got from prostitutes. Monogamy really is a virtue, then as now.
Monogamy was due to property and parentage. The men needed to guarantee their heir was their child. This is why there were greater social repercussions for women who were unfaithful. Also why it was rare for men to be monogamous, since bastard children were not so taboo.
@@robinb.6711 That's why we need to value monogamy, and not just marriage. I'm not against the "try it before you buy it" principle however. That's very different from whoring around like men used to do (and both sexes do today)
@Bear Greendale Nope. Only maladjusted people who didn't get enough attention from mommy and daddy seek validation through endless sexual relationships.
All of this is wrong. This is possibly the worst video I've seen from Weird History. Go watch Abby Cox's video "Historian Reacts to Weird History's History of Powdered Wigs (I like to suffer...)" for real information.
I feel sorry for anybody who watches any of the videos on weird history and believes they're getting actual history. These people systematically click bait you with cuts and reposts from previous vlogs that were incorrect in the first place. They don't do research, they simply regurgitate already disproven historical myths left and right. Occasionally they might get something right, but it's not because they're trying to. Horrible, irresponsible channel.
In France we have this expression « sucrer les fraises » (putting sugar on strawberries, which is also the name of these huge collar they whore (strawberries)) when you use it, it means that the person is not far from being senile… aka his head shaking would make dandruff falling on the fraise/ strawberry / collar. So he puts sugar on the strawberries. I am not sure it is true but I like it, so it true for me
I can't imagine life back then. I got dermatitis on my face, and was freaking out. Then, what's worse, there's no known cause for it. So, I just put meds on to try and prevent it. But, the biggest lesson back then should have been to stop all the sex with multiple partners. I mean, there's a reason for monogamy. Not contracting disease is a huge one. I feel sorry for wives who caught syphilis from their husband's back then; especially, if they were pregnant.
There was a reason for monogamy back when everyone had dangerous STDs with no known cure, and had no safe birth control. Nowadays we have medicine and birth control, so monogamy is just a personal choice!
@@jp9707 except HIV (progressing to aids), asymptomatic chlamydia that can make you infertile, neurosyphilis which can't be reversed. There's still plenty of dangers with STDs. Plus, studies show that the less sexual partners you have, the happier and more fulfilled you are with the person you settled down with. Monogamy still has it's argument.
Lice wasn't the reason for wearing wigs. Wigs were just made of human hair, sometimes from the wig wearer. You could cut your hair off and have it made into a wig. Washington was just following a style that applied to both natural hair still attached and natural hair made into wigs.
@@melissamybubbles6139 Yes, there were many reasons listed besides lice. Disease, fashion, flaunting wealth & status, hairloss, etc. The powder wigs were coated in helped resist parasites & head odor as well. It did wonders for Washington.
You showed the wrong William Pitt. By 1795 William Pitt the Younger was Prime Minister. The image shown was a portrait of William Pitt the Elder, who was Prime Minister just after the 'Seven Years War'/'French and Indian War', circa 1766. Which technically speaking, was the actual 'First World War'.
... in the African-American Community I don't think wigs ever went away they just changed color. With the continuing rise of social media synthetic hair in neon colors is widely used in the African-American community and arguably gain Traction in other ethnic groups. If anything I would consider this rise of bright colors to be a sort of return to wigs
Cannot believe how wildly inaccurate this is. If you want information based in real historical research head over to Abby Cox 's channel and watch her tutorial on pomaded and powdered hair in the 18th century. This channel is not history but sensationalism.
Posting a video full of lies and images stolen from another youtuber who actually knows what's she's talking about, well… 🤮 Congrats, once again you stand out (for the wrong reasons, though)
Fun Fact: We work a total of 14 times harder than people did in the 14th century. Peasants back in the day had all the free time in the world by comparison.
@@KyleOber You have a point. You don’t have a nice Berkey filter… And I got the fluoride filters as well. Now of course they need to be replaced and there are no replacements available now for months. What I still haven’t done is get a fluoride and chlorine filter for my shower. Now I don’t know… I’m not that smart… But they say that your skin… The largest organ in your body absorbs all of that crap when you take a shower. Not to mention the fact that this sounds a little out there that the hot water with the chlorine makes a form of chloroform… So when you take a hot shower you’re breathing in more poison. That’s the crazy thing we are so advanced in our knowledge and understanding of things. What are actions do not reflect that wisdom. Sometimes yes sometimes no. And why… Largely because of greed and selfishness… And sometimes because of incompetence. Stay free, my friend!
my phone broke and when they sent me a new one my subs were erased and 85 I'd never heard of were in place. Yours was one. I erased most but kept yours and am enjoying. Future topics I'd like to see : Smoking, guitars or other musical instruments, cannabis use, unusual characters and animals. You seem to do perty well on your own. Looking to perusing your catalog. Good job. Thanks 👍
Stanley Tucci is so badassly confident in his glorious baldness that were he to travel back in time to 16th Century Europe, baldness as a status symbol would swiftly sweep the land, right before everyone dies of the covid 19 Stanley was unwittingly carrying.
Wigs have been popular since Egyptian times and they are hugely popular now. They save you time and money. Let's face it hairdressing salons are time consuming and very expensive. Synthetic hair is by fair the best, I have 4 myself and bad hair days are gone for good lol
Agreed! Although I myself have never worn a wig outside my bathroom (I just can't do wigs or weaves, I do hats instead😊), I appreciate their time saving capabilities!
I disagree. I have natural hair past my hips and it's far cheaper than a good wig, which is in the hundreds. I dye it myself and use decent products to keep it looking healthy, literally takes less than 2 minutes to tie it up in a ponytail and run a straightener/styling balm through it which is what I usually do.
Yeah, this is bulls*ht. It's disturbing how this video claims it's historical but in fact it's not, it's far from it. Put a disclaimer there?? Also, why did you guys steal images of another artist without their consent or at least crediting them? Is it laziness or are you just petty?
Suddenly I'm very glad to live in one of the few periods in history when it's socially acceptable for a man to shave his head. It's easy, clean, neat and cheap. The only drawback is that I must wear a hat on sunny days or face serious sunburn!
*at the moment my forehead is preoccupied with migrating to the back of my neck but this is nicely counterbalanced by my mentat quality eyebrows and bushy shoulder length sideburns and ever so witty means by which i choose to converse with others*
It depends on civilization, in ME/ Central Asia generally men shaved their heads and let only a sort of "tail", before Manchou's conquest for chinese men shaving their head was seen as an offence to body's sacrality, then the Manchous imposed the "pigtail" to every man in China, in early 17th century. And in S.East Asia it depends from the ethnicity, on the contrary in Africa most tribes or shave their heads or have very short hair, such as the Zulus.
@@scottmantooth8785 If you grow out those eyebrows and sideburns enough, you can comb them all up toward the top of your head and band them into a topknot ponytail. Maybe even embellish your "do" with one of those multi-color curly-ribbon bows from the gift wrap aisle.
@@merriemisfit8406 *as my forehead continues its deliberate advance of slowly migrating to the back of my neck i think the sideburns and eyebrows have negotiated something of a mutual understanding of non interference and are committed to remain passive observers...gaudy embellishments by the sideburns or eyebrows might be construed as being in violation of their follicle interlude /quantitative alopecia discrepancy harmonic subsidiary thingy... yeah it's complicated*
Please note the illegal use of images in this video, copy right infringement steals money from independent content creators. Cease this practice, take down this video. #AbbyCoxdeservesrespect
Even as late as 1962, in her book, I HATE TO HOUSEKEEP, Peg Bracken advised women to have a wig that looked like their own hair at its best for what we would call "bad hair days".
I shudder to think of it what kind of educational system brought forth a person, someone whose experience with education would be so abysmal, that they consider infotainment material worthy of being part of a curriculum.
@@dominic.h.3363 Don't shudder too much. I actually think there's a valid point to be made, i. e. humor goes a long way in getting children's attention. Consider humor as one way to introduce more difficult topics of learning.
@@dominic.h.3363 Such is the mindset of Generation Z!! 🤷🏻♂️ If they can’t be taught educational things in the same way they watched Phineas and Ferb & SpongeBob SquarePants, it can’t hold their attention, and therefore just isn’t worth learning lol. This channel knows their demographic well.
I remember that SpongeBob episode where he wears a wig, uses it as a mop - and overall is filthy. He thinks he’s fashionable. I don’t think wigs should make a comeback. I don’t want people’s head lice and bedbugs
BE SURE TO READ MY ANSWER TO TINA W BELOW! Modern-wise good wigs are made as close to natural hair as possible. I'm speaking here only of fine, thin, Caucasian hair -- what I got on my head. For a fill-in piece, a good wigmaker can keep the top of the wig low and close to your scalp and the sides delicately thin. A lot of us wimmin who lose our hair because of age/alopecia welcome these. Some of us can't just go with a close-cut style because it just isn't becoming. Unlike the dense wigs of the sixties, these are cool, weightless and wonderfully comfortable. You don't have all the hair and scalp damage caused by daily styling. And all you have to do is chop off your own hair when it starts to hang out below your wig. Man, that saves a lot of time!
Actually, East Indian hair is the most saught after. Plus short hair is not "unbecoming." Some women look great with short cropped hair. Your ethnocentrism is showing girl.
I've lost my hope for this channel. I've never liked your side jokes, because they are mostly weak and make you look like you're making "people in the past were all stupid" joke, instead of giving us the facts (well documented facts, if you please), and let us decide for ourselves. But now that you've used other people's pictures out of context, without their consent, and without even mentioning the creator, I'VE LOST ALL HOPE.
The new Weird Food History series could do shows on the days of pre-refrigeration cold storage techniques, some of which went back to ancient times -- root cellars, basements, springhouses, cutting blocks of winter ice from ponds, lakes, or rivers, floating them to store in ice houses, delivery to cities, etc.
My grandma used to watch it brought to the ice box insulated box at her parents farm on a wagon. If they couldn't get any they wrapped things and place them in an ice cold river. But how did they make the ice for delivery?
You can look that up yourself and find more accurate information, they don't even bother, just dig up bullshit and serve it with stolen images and contradiction.
This video is a “Social Disaster”. Did they even do research? Please change the name of this channel to “We Poorly Research Or Just Make Stuff Up About History”. Also I hope it gets hit with copyright infringement from Abby Cox. She’s the person that anyone interested in wig/hair history SHOULD be listening to. I wonder if Catherine DeMedici shows up in this one too… 🙄
It’s only a matter of time before weird history makes a video about the The trend for women to shave and shape their hair down there… Which eventually led to men…scaping their southturf.