You through me for a loop when you said you used the sub with the "REL Soul VI". Then when I saw the picture I realized you meant the "Zu" Soul VI. I will be interested to hear what you think of the "Zu Soul VI when you do the review.
I used a Rel SHO 3 sub for many years with my stand mount speakers and loved it. Then I was lucky enough to be able to update my speakers to the Kef Reference 5. They are huge speakers and go deep, so disconnected my Rel - why would I need a sub too? But I was missing something that I had with my stand mounts plus Rel. So I reconnected the Rel, but set at a very low volume and crossover. I was amazed - it really opened up the soundstage again. For me it is definitely the way the Rel opens up the soundstage, rather than seeking more bass.
I completely agree on how good adding a sub is, and I particularly enjoyed your “seen and not heard” idea. I don’t know why certain reviewers say that blending a sub is time consuming or difficult - it isn’t (or doesn’t have to be). The difference even a small sub can make is definitely worth the extra expense. I’ll certainly consider this REL if & when I’m looking for my next subwoofer. Thanks Steve👍
I first learned about REL subwoofers from an earlier review that Steve did. Based on this, I emailed REL for more info about adding a sub to my vintage 1970-era stereo rig, and was surprised to receive a personal reply from the Chief Designer, John Hunter. Before he would recommend a specific sub, John asked for some details about my rig, my speakers, and the music I listened to. Based on my answers he recommended the REL T/5i. John also made himself available if I had questions on how to connect the sub to my existing rig. I could go on and on about how the T/5i has taken my sound reproduction to a whole new level of listening enjoyment. John's personal input, and Steve's recommendation made the REL a good buy. Highly recommend REL - and Steve, too!. 5 stars.
I also sent a request for a recommendation based on my gear, listening preferences, room dynamics, etc. and was amazed to get a reply within hours. The very best level of service possible. I was recommended the HT 1003MK as I also combine my 2 channel music with tv viewing.
WOW! I just bought TWO of these in white!!! Got the two for $1150!..Runnin' both on high-current from my 40+-year-old Bob Carver C-500. Kicked the volume waaaaaay down on the subs and blended them in with my DynAudio Contour 20s…just to fill out the bottom end and give me fuller sound.! I got the subs on super subtle blend-in, as you say.. it is such a nice improvement to my stereo listening. Filled out the soundstage! WONDERFUL!! As a bonus I split the LFE from my Marantz AVR and hooked that up to both subwoofers 🔊 and turned that volume knob up a bit on each subwoofer to get a little more slam for movies. Can you say WIN/WIN?! It's a new audio world…..
Steve, you never mentioned the obvious...how does the REL sound compared to the SVS Micro and Kef KC62 for two channel listening. Which would you choose ?
@@VictorZubakin yeah…I opted for TWO T/5Xs for $350 less than one KEF K62. (The RELS are on sale right now). That was a no brainer for me. Not sure if I made the correct choice…but once blending them in with the high-current cables provided by REL so that they "vanished" as Steve says…(I had to turn the volume and the crossover waaaaay low), I am impressed with how they complement my DynAudio Contour 20s, which already reach quite low…. Would love to have compared a pair of the KEFs…but cost and logistics of doing a comparison of two subwoofers (stereo), of both brands was too overwhelming to me. 😬
Another reviewer made a piece comparing the SVS Micro, KEF KC 62 and T/7x that you may find interesting. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-HiPwGE114H8.html
@@VictorZubakin Another reviewer made a piece comparing the SVS Micro, KEF KC 62 and T/7x that you may find interesting. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-HiPwGE114H8.html
Yeah, horrible set-up here. It’s always a shame to see people spending good money on a system, then putting zero thought into its positioning and set-up.
@@carlitomelon4610 no, I don’t. But I would think anyone having this system and watching this channel would have an idea that this isn’t the best way to position the speakers for listening.
Thank you Steve for your excellent review. I have just installed the T5x in my over 40m² living room (Cambridge Audio CXA61 and Fyne Audio F502) and it sounds absolutely amazing!!!! Going for a larger sub like the T7x would have been an overkill, specially for my neighbours. I am using it for music listening only, seldom for TV. Great improvement in my listening experience. Best regards from Portugal
This was just what I needed to read! Im in the market for a sub to augment my Dali Oberon 1 in our 40 square meter livingroom. We live in a semi-attached town house. Wherever I read Im suggested svs sb-1000 pro a 12" 325w sub and always gets frown upon when mentioning rel. I even sent rel an Email asking for advice and Ron suggested a T5x for our space. I dont want bass, I want space (in the sound). I need to get a T5x and an svs home and decide for my self, but thank you for mentioning that the T5x is enough for your space and that the T7x would have been to much.
Over the years it’s been interesting to note the shifts in audiophile culture viewpoints. In the early 80’s subwoofers we’re strictly a home theater thing, which itself was just emerging. Then too there was a somewhat de-emphasis on measurements that’s happened but more importantly bringing the idea that what sounds good to the listener is what matters most; that there is no such the as perfect, by its very nature this is reproduction. Language has shifted too. A few things like clipping and muddy were used whereas now the language is much more textural, nuanced and evocative of the visceral experience. All good stuff. Today, though my thinking shifted that maybe a sub in a two channel system isn’t heresy :-) Thanks, Steve!
You are right! Ive played around with many different speaker systems and amplifiers and have even designed my own crossovers. A good subwoofer goes lower and deeper than even most tower speakers. It really anchors the soundstage and helps give a sense of depth. The lowest octave really makes a difference
Steve, it would seem that the sound from a down firing sub would be heavily effected by the surface it sits on. That could range from stone to thick carpet. What was your setup, and what does REL recommend?
I've had my stereo rel T5s firing on a thick carpet and on a concrete slab which btw was sitting on high density foam and I can vouch as far as sound quality goes there was no difference, mind you when on a concrete slab isolator there was little less vibrations on the leather couch.
The big wavelengths of subwoofer freqs are essentially not impacted by the surface type. Up at the upper end of the subs range, an 80hz wavelength is over 14 feet long (~4m).
I have a REL T/5 matched up with a pair of B&W 705 signatures and find the combo excellent. I have them connected through the high level input, as for me it was why buy a REL if you aren't? There are a lot of really good subs out there but this is what makes the brand unique. In fact that is why I got the REL, that and the nice compact size and finish. I was not looking for massive base, but to augment the 705's in a smaller area. Now I have it all matched up with a Doge 10 Mk 3, Prima Luna DAC fed by a IFI Zen streamer, LOVE IT!
I own the previous Rel T5 model. I have two matched first with Dynaudio Emit 20 bookshelf speakers and now Dynaudio Emit 30 speakers. They sound incredible. Rel has definitely changed my thought process about subs with speakers for music. Rel subs are way more musical than the SVS subs I own. The whole idea of "NOT hearing the sub but the music" was a bit to get used to, but once you're locked in on the ideology of it, listening to a sub will never be the same. LOVE my Rel T5i subs. Definitely worth the money.
I just received this sub 2 weeks ago pairing with my sonus farber. I’m not a audiophile but it feel like I just bought a new system. It’s the cheapest upgrade you can do for your system. My question is breaking in. There are some RU-vid for sub woofer breakin. Can you recommend? Thanks much.
Great review Steve. Thank-you. I always learn something new from your videos. E.g. interesting engineering amplifier choice by REL. A "no time delay" class A/B amp offers less time delay vs a digital amp which has to sample and convert the analogue signal. I also agree with the logic of using the speaker level input because the hooked up speakers do potentially interact with the amp and you may want to maintain the timing integrity of that interaction in the deep bass. As you suggest, the other bonus with a sub or subs is you get a "low frequency tone control" to optimally dial in the bass tone of what you're listening to.
I really enjoyed your review. I am new to Hifi and trying to setup my system. I have a 120 sq ft room, and only listen to music. I have a pair of KEF Q150's. 2 questions: I am trying to decide between the T/5X and the 1003 MKII. Which would you recommend for my setup? Secondly, I only have budget for 1 sub, which one is better solo? Thank you
…to add to my previous comment, ‘Flight of the Cosmic Hippo’ from Béla Fleck & the Flecktones is sounding better than ever and the sub seems well-integrated, just as I would wish it!
I second the use of two subs; the Ti series can be had for cheaper used so you don’t have to break the bank, or you could always get along with one new one and add another later if you come across a good deal. I personally would go bigger than smaller if you have the space.
got one last year and what a difference! planning on buying another for my living room system. best thing Ive one for my system in a long time. great vid Steve
Steve, thank you for reviewing this REL-sub! For about 3 months I have my own REL T7x. It's a killer sub for my modest living room (about 4x5 meters). It blends perfectly with my reworked Sansui LM220-Speakers and I have perfect bass and room pressurization on loud listening sessions. But in the late hours the sub helps to reduce volume and to have a nice sound either. The soundstage is much bigger now, and there is no boomy bass whatsoever. Thanks for all your work. I appreciate your way of reviewing a lot! Stay safe (you and Mrs Audiophiliac)! I can only recommend adding a sub to the 2-channel-system!!!
@@marko-182 By the time I moved into an even slightly smaller room (4,2x4,5m). It still sounds great. Given the fact that I had a lot of freedom in furniture and speaker placement and room treatment I think my humble setup sounds perfect to me, now. Best regards.
What's the point of a sub that is down 6 dB at 32 Hz? Music goes lower. You don't have to be a ridiculous basshead to want another 5-10 Hz at the bottom end.
I’m never been fully onboard with implementing a sub into an audio system. I prefer 2 channel. I have the T5i. I have it set to 1/5 on the min/max volume. The crossover is set at 30hz (lowest setting). The REL is hooked up to the high level amp input via the Arrow wireless transmitter. The REL is located on the opposite (back) wall in the corner of the room. Sounds wonderful and blends seamless with a pair of Spendor 4/5 Classics. I know the sub is there but I cannot locate it by ear..so I’ve got it dialed in to my preference. And you’re correct…the recording quality dictates the effectiveness of what you’ll hear. No speaker can fix a poor recording.
Make sure the driver size of the sub isn't a huge difference to the largest driver of your speakers. It will integrate better if there isn't as drastic of a difference in size.
Steve, I purchased this unit some months ago to add to my Klipsh rp160m speakers , it has added another dimension to my music. money well spent - i say! I have mine on floor boards in a close listening set up.
100% all analogue. love the high level speaker connection. that suits my setup massively. Cheers Steve, love from an Irishman living in Nottingham England. top vid ✨
I think I have a low budget winner. My 30 year old Kenwood bookshelf system finally smoked. (I tease my wife that it was from her country music.) The system was expensive when new and had pretty decent speakers for the time, LS-622. It was the right size and power for the room I used it in. I hadn't looked into audio equipment for a long time and set out on a replacement quest. Much of what I found was oriented towards home theater, not my goal. Then I stumbled upon the Marantz M-CR612. It seemed to be the perfect cornerstone for rebuilding. I test drove it at a great audio store, Listen Up. I listened to some fantastic B&W speakers (way out of budget) with and without the REL T5x. Then the wheels started turning. What if I mate the receiver with the Kenwood speakers and the REL, and then consider upgrading speakers later? Having gotten the REL dialed in and broken-in the combination sounds delightful. I play bass in a brass ensemble and a larger band, and listen for nuances in music. There's plenty of detail in this setup for my aging ears. The added bass detail is the icing on the cake!
Great review. I am looking to get either the 7X or the 9X to replace my Klipsch SPL 100. It does great for my home theater portion of my home theater system. I want something with faster and more musical bass when 2 channel listening.
The speaker level is a must for music listening. It doesn’t pull power, but it makes sure that the subwoofer is not too loud or too soft based on the volume of the wattage going to the speakers. It will not rob your speakers of power. It is powered remember.😇 I have had a REL Sub for 15+ years no complaints.
I was going to spend a lot more on subs but I was urged to give these a go and I'm glad I did. I have two of them and they mate exceptionally well with my Raidho XT-1 speakers. The blend is seamless and the sound quality is far better than what I would have hoped from such relatively inexpensive subs. Also should mention that the build quality and appearance is right up there with my Raidho speakers - but at a fraction of the cost! Needless to say I am really please with this purchase.
I’ve just had my T5/x a few days and I’m so pleased with its addition to my system (Orchard Audio Pecan Pi Ultra streamer/DAC, Gamut D200 dual-mono power amp, Stereo Coffee kit LDR pre-, Sonus Faber Concerto Home speakers, Rega P3 and iFi iPhono2). My SF speakers did a great job but the addition of the single T5/x has definitely increased stereo depth and presence. I’m probably still dialling it in, however I’m impressed and it has contributed to my already great system just as I had hoped.
@@westernartifact580 I have them both connected to the amp terminals via Speakon cable. I've been experimenting tuning one for low bass and the other tuned to support mids. Kind of like that. Two subs doing 2 different jobs.
Thanks for this Blaq Bird, I was just going to ask Steve if these would pair well (=be fast enough to blend with) Maggie LRS or .7’s…. This helps me a lot! Which Maggie’s are you running?
I have two T5 for many years. I had been using one for music production, and another in my secondary system with some so-so satellite speakers. I moved both of them to my living paired with Klipsch RP-600Ms driving by a Schiit Aegir. Once in the right place not only is the bass now punchy/musical/visceral, it opened the sound stage. When the source material calls for it, my soundstage is wall to wall. I've owned a LOT of speakers over the years, this is the best my system has ever sounded. In a few years when both my kids are out of college I may look at some high-efficiency towers, but I am afraid I will need to spend too much to see any significant improvement..
Hmm. A FirstWatt J2, set of ELAC DBR-62 and a REL sub. Fed by a modified XDA-2 and you have my current system! Yes, the REL should be set up so that you forget its there. Sometimes I switch it off for a minute to refresh that 'aha' moment.
The speaker level input is the way to go if you have an expensive tube amp and you want that tube sound in the subs. My question is if you’re running below 80 on your main speakers and on yourself will those frequencies cancel each other out?
The main speakers are run full range, meaning they have output below 80 Hz. They will not be out of phase or cancel when the 0/180 phase switch on the REL correctly. That's achieved by listening to music with lots of bass and flipping the switch, which ever position produces the most bass is the correct position.
@@SteveGuttenbergAudiophiliac That’s right!! I remember reading about running two separate speakers on each channel and how they can “fight each other” but yes, the louder position on the phase switch on the sub means it can work great with lower than 80 frequencies on the mains. Im going to be using a wilsenton r800i with all upgraded tubes and a Gustard R26 Dac. Thanks for the reply!
Before I bought my REL R-305 from one who has become a fellow audiophile friend, I was worried about connecting it in with my speaker outputs - never heard of such a thing. But I read up on REL’s very informative website, and all fears subsided. I’m using the R-305 with my Magnepan MG-2.6/R’s and it is wonderful. Everything you said about the REL being a musical sub which enhances the speakers is spot on. Thanks, Steve!
Yessss they do make a difference‚ in a great way. Have two REL 5‚ and every ting sounds more real‚ the thump on a instrument‚ the fingers sliding on strings‚ the pedal's on a piano‚ all come alive. They also expand the posebilety of trying more bookshelf speaker's and never worry about having enough low end.
Great video! I have similar taste in sound in that I want something punchy for music versus shaking the foundations of my house. I chose REL over SVS, and I am very happy. I listened to an SVS in a store and found it to be a bit too boomy, while the REL was tighter and provided a better representation of the music to my ears.
Hi Steve. Wondering if you could say a bit about the size of the subwoofer. I was surprised that an 8" sub would work well with a floorstander with 10" drivers, thinking that the sub should be at least 2" or so wider in diameter... Is this completely wrong?
I have a REL Q50 that I bought in 2007 for £150 secondhand, It works in pretty much the same way, the companies philosophy still rings true after all these years... Nice to see! I've heard some larger and more modern units by them, but they share a similar sound, setup and overall feel, They are definitely better on the high level inputs, they do take some playing around with in regards to room position and levels, but yeah... You will find the sweetspot for your room and be in heaven, in 'REL speak' it's all about finding the exact position/levels and 'pressurising' the room... I love that term! (hence the corner position) The guy that designed the boards was ex Navy, I believe he designed boards for submarines, If you open up a REL you will find over-engineering of an epic scale, FR4 boards twice as thick as necessary... Traces thicker than ya momma... Components 2x over-rated...that's what he learned in the navy, if it could possibly break... then make sure it doesn't! The Q50 at 50 watts is great for a small UK living room, 125 Watts is probably more fitting for the average US home though, My mates with 200W to 300W subs by Pioneer, Toshiba, (insert cheap home theatre sub here), etc. could not believe the difference, theirs just didn't integrate and stop booming, my paltry 50W sub seamlessly integrated with the main speakers and room acoustics and kicked arse! 🔊⚠️🤯 It was good for films (I have a Marantz surround processor) but much, much better for 2.1 It's like products from many other quality Hifi manufacturers... It's not about the numbers... It's about the experience
With the REL having only a single low passed RCA input, were you able to connect only the left or only the right channel off of your amp? That would make the big difference in sound between that and using the high-level stereo summed input.
I have an "original" T5 and a T5i. Two subs is the way to go! Originally I had them with KEF LS50 and then the Magnepan LRS. More recently I hooked the T5 to a pair of Infinity Kappa 7s. Pleasantly surprised how much the T5s added when I shoved them almost into the corner with the Kappas pretty far in front and diagonally away. The bass boost was impressive in the corner and went deeper than the 12" Infinity speaker on the T5.
The parametric EQ (controllable with a smart-phone app or on the back panel) that comes with the SVS subs makes a huge audible difference. I would never go back to sub that can't be fine-tuned with parametric EQ.
Spot on I've never understood the aversion to EQ'ing. There isn't a system that isn't significantly improved via parametric EQ. The room's transfer function owns the sound. Small room acoustics introduces massive resonant peaks that dominate the listening experience.
May I add? The Martin Logan Dynamo series goes even futher then SVS. ARC room correction saved me from the heavy 25Hz. bump at my listening position. Once the Anthem system made the adjustments (with software / laptop connection via USB to the subwoofer) with Martin Logan's 'Perfect Bass Kit', for which it sampled from 5 locations, the curve was smoothened out down to 17Hz. (Dynamo 1600x) in my listening space! After those corrections were made, I could make the tipical adjustments with the tablet. Very cool stuff (O:
I think for the price the T/5 is exceptional. Also you don't have the front grill that I don't like. On the bass side, T/7x goes deeper but it was not night and day as I imagined. The T/5 is now a T/5x, with a redesigned cabinet and I guess some other improvements. If I had to choose now, I would go for the T/5x.
I've had a REL Q150 for 20 years and recently added a second in immaculate condition for not much money. Both connected high level for music to my Roksan K2 and one for each side. The soundstage is amazing and they add air to everything. A pair also helps with bass loading in the room and corner placement is not actually necessary, in fact they sound better along the Speaker wall in the middle nearest to each speaker it is paired to. They both disappear once setup and just sit below the speaker output just extending them. I also have low level .1 for my AV surround setup and they shake the house when theres explosions etc. I'd never go to another subwoofer make and they would have to blow up for me to consider changing them.
I use an Audioquest Black Dog subwoofer cable which comes with grounding wires at both ends of the cable which you attach to your system in case there is an audible hum. There is no hum in my system but regardless I recently connected the grounding wire to a screw on the chassis of the amp as well as to a screw on the sub frame. I find that the bass response is improved quite a bit, tighter and digs deep. I have no idea why. Maybe there was some stray current.
ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-DNO0BhcfqMA.html You say 'Rel Soul 6' when I believe it should be 'Zu'. I'm curious what you think re. phase integration vs. cross-over integration between speaker and subwoofer. Does time-alignment make a difference in your experience?
I'm sure the REL is a great sub, but for my 2 channel system I use a 75 watt 8" Martin Logan sub that I got from Amazon a decade ago for a buck fifty. For music, with a nice bookshelf speaker, it adds all the bottom I need. I think. Maybe one day I'll audition a REL just to see what I'm missing.
I ended up buying the Predator 1508HT @$999 and I bought 2. Free shipping and 60 in home free trial. Maybe not quite as musical but it's always about choices...
I just added a pair of T9x to my open baffle Pure Audio Project Quintet 10 and like Steve said they keep up well. Great narrative Steve really hit the nail on the head describing how subwoofers are supposed to operate in a two channel system
I believe speaker level input can be problematic to class D and you risk amp damage. I believe the solution is to connect only the + out of your amp with the - in connected to earth. I'm not fully informed on this though possibly worth mentioning.
We made a video about this not too long ago. You just need to connect the negative speaker wire to a chassis ground instead of the negative speaker terminal. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-RmdOw4WLtnA.html
I have a pair of the T/5x predecessor the T/5i and I don't use them any longer. No matter how I hooked them up - RCA or high level - there was a hum in the background during those silent moments between tracks. I tried everything I could to eliminate the hum to no avail. The hum bugged me so much that I decided to just pull them out of my system and go without. I eventually stumbled across a deal on an Elac 3010 sub and there was no hum. I ultimately put the 3010 back in the box, too, as I upgraded my speakers to Tekton Mini Lore's that had most of the base that I was looking for without the hassle of having to deal with more equipment.
I currently have a MartinLogan Dynamo 600x sub and can say it definitely helps not only fill in the low end, but seems to make the mid-range seem richer, too. That said, I have always coveted the REL subs. One will be in my audiophile journey at some point. Thanks, as always Steve for a great review.
@@klepp19 I actually purchased new speakers and am waiting for delivery. They are Tyler Acoustics T2 Timekeepers and they go down to about 30 hz, so I am going to see how the bass response is with these first. My 602s only go down to 52 hz, so this will be completely different. I need to see how that bass sounds in my room. Maybe just keeping the 608 might work with these new speakers. We shall see!
Yes, I should’ve made that point. Small subs for small rooms big ones for big rooms. But you also depends on your appetite for bass, a small sub in a big room might be all you need.
I like that it comes with the cable to connect it up no need to buy anything else all you need is in the box. I believe you mentioned the Zu soul 6 not REL. rocking a T9i with B&W 603 anniversary edition. Blends well and adds so much depth. You correct yourself later in the video
Steve, This was very serendipitous for me as I am shopping Subs to round out my system. After visiting several audiophile's home systems around the country I realized they all used 2 to 4 subs and achieved great sound and soundstage. As I am in a medium sized room and my current speakers only go down to 40hz it seems the next important improvement I should address is adding a couple of subs. The down firing REL T5x sounds like the ticket. Thanks!
I have a t5i REL with my Joseph Audio Profiles and a REL t7i with my Tannoy XT8Fs. I like the pop of the sealed enclosure of the 5s better than the t7i's which have a pasive radiator added with the 8 inch drive. I say a pair of REL x5ti's or the new x's would make any speaker system under $10K alot better. It DOES open up the midrange, by putting less strain on the main speakers bass and mid bass drivers. Highly Recomended.
I’m guessing you are not using an AVR with a crossed-over sub out. Being the REL has no high pass for the speakers, then your and anyone’s speakers are run full range. Speakers will be strained just the same whether the sub is hooked up or not. I have that same quandary myself, running B&W 805 D3’s full range with a pair of MartinLogan Dynamo 800’s off my Luxman L-590 AxII pre-outs. With LP reply I watch the drivers on the 805s jiggle about on any but perfect LPs. Funny, the subs don’t jiggle at all. Good for M-L to put a steep roll off below 20Hz. 🤔
@@daniannaci3258 Yes actually I do run through an AVR, actually a Pre Amp/ Processor, the Yamaha CX5200, powered by Odyssey Kismet, about 160 wpc x2 as I only use two channel for both music and movies. Whatever the mechanism, these subs open up the midrange of the main speakers they are supporting. I agree with Steve on that. First thing I noticed.
Connecting a high impedance input across the speaker terminals would allow the sub to also get the counter EMF from the speaker as part of it's signal where the amps' sub or preamp out would not. So yes it would get a slightly different signal.
I had to look around my listening area to see if you were in the room, Steve. Fast & tight bass is achieved here with just a few minutes setting the crossover to the level that the individual listener prefers. My go to test track is Secret World by Peter Gabriel with Tony Levin just jamming on that Chapman Stick. Eighth notes way down in the 30hz range and each note is distinct with no boom. My room has a stone floor and you cannot ask for a better surface for fast and tight low end. A great sub never gets in the way of your main speakers and goes where needed. My speakers (XR-50) are only 18 inches tall but you think they are 6 feet tall now. Hard to explain the difference you hear on a comment section, but it is there. Just my 2 cents. Great info in your video.
Hi Steve! What do you think? I can buy 1 very good sub (2k USD) or 2 1k+ each. 1 JL audio e110 or 2 Rythmik f12 or 2 HSU ULS 15MKII? What would you do? Read your CNET review about the e110, and I'm pretty sure you know the others. This is just for stereo listening.
Wasn't looking for a sub when you made this video. I am currently looking to add a sub to my JBL L52 speakers. My concern with this sub is it's down firing and my system is located on the second floor of my 50+ old home. Would I be better off with a forward firing sub. Thanks in advance for your opinion
Steve I need your help, can’t decide between REL T5X VS SVS Micro 3000 to pair with my Klipsch RP-600 and my KEF LS50 music only listening. Which one would you pick?
Hi Steve! Where in the HT receiver would I need to connect the sub’s high level connection cable to? Usually in receivers you have ports for main, center, rear speakers (in 5.1) and an RCA for sub connection.. am I missing something?
