The Rolling Stones - Love In Vain (Live) - Official 

Mick Taylor man. Rolling Stones were peak when he was there.

@@Dr.JeremyDunks Taylor elevated the Stones ,to a higher frequency of consciousness.

Soundtrack of my sweet 16 days.

​@@georgehorner1578but Brian can't be replaced anyway

Moi tous les jours love in vain depuis 60 ans,c'est da.s mes veines, ça coule❤

every year

Love Mick, love Keith, love Charlie, love Ronnie, and love Brian the goats

June 20, 2024 My 76th Birthday

Yes in the middle of the night

Wow. Had to scroll a while to find a single comment crediting Johnson 🫡

i just wish Michaelangelo didn't leave The Stones before being able to paint the Seventeenth Chapel

A real masterpiece

And he was just a teenager at the time.

John Mayall brought him up right.

Yes, indeedy🎉included in my Playlists:Jagger does pay him fulsome praise in interviews 😊

Jagger was so sorry when Taylor left :(

@@Methilde Mick T. left the band because he was still a young man and could no longer put up with the heavy drug use. Keith's heroin addiction certainly did not help. Keith, who by this time had befriended Gram Parsons in London, and along with Jagger, had talked Parsons into abandoning Roger McGuinn and the Byrds on a South Africa concert tour. Ostensibly, because of apartheid. Parsons, who by that time had an expensive daily heroin habit of his own, was a perfect friend for Keith. Parsons accompanied Richards and the Stones to Nelle Cote, their tax haven mansion on the French gold coast. There, they were recording "Exile on Main Street" in the mansions basement, along with saxophonist Bobby Keys and pianist Nicky Hopkins, among others. Keys had a habit himself. But Keith and Gram were up till all hours of the night playing the piano and guitars, singing and arguing about old Lefty Frizzell and George Jones tunes. Taylor had been drawn into the insane world of heroin and drugs and realized he had to leave to preserve what little was left of his sanity. So when the Stones left L.A. following post production work there on the Exile album, Mick T. left the band to get clean. When Parsons, a trust fund dilettante musical genius, returned to L.A., he formed the Flying Burrito Brothers, breakthrough " country-rock" band along with Chris Hillman who had played bass on the Byrds "Sweetheart of the Rodeo" album with Parsons, McGuinn and the Byrds. Jagger even graciously allowed Parsons to record "Wild Horses" first before the Stones did. These events have been confirmed in at least two different Parsons biographies(one written by Ben Fong Torres of Rolling Stone magazine fame). Taylor looked up to Jagger, Watts and Wyman for guidance and protection from the forces of evil. But, Jagger was too wrapped up in his own musical, marital, money and business problems to spare any time to help Taylor. The rest is history.

@@rogerspalding5673 Jagger asked to Taylor to just take a break and maybe comes back but Taylor wanted to left definitely.

Taylor would have stuck around if they had paid him a few bucks once in awhile.

@@jamesbowen8960 officially it's not what Taylor said but who knows execpted those who were there.

Well said. He's so damn good he could be southern.

there is no kids

There is no..?

@@rhondamims9254 Great comment!

Well said my friend, I totally agree

W eird aint it, the way we see things, I never thought Mick Taylor made the grade, I saw him play with the Stones on 2 occasions and both times I thought he was lacking, not in competence, just he wasn't in the band. When Ronnie Wood joined, they reached the pinnacle,

@@cunobelinusX31 Taylor didn't enjoy the lifestyle of being a Rolling Stone. Definitely the best guitarist for them, much better than Woodie! Ron Wood is a good guitarist though and fit in better!

Nope. Compare it to the solo on Get Yer Yayas Out. Taylor was burned out by this point. Too many gigs, too many late nights or no nights and too many chemicals had dulled him. His slide playing is nowhere near where it was just a few years previously. Such a shame, because the lad could play!

@@andrewarnott6106 I was burned out too. Maybe I still am.........

@@cunobelinusX31 "when ronnie joined they reached the pinnacle" ? That's just so wrong lmao. No other Stones Album except for maybe Some girls can compete with the album's Taylor played on.

Brian Jones was pretty damn good too

I totally agree - I saw them in California in 1969 and again in 1972 and to this day I remain blown away by how great those concerts were !

I agree with you, but it was also the year Mick and Keith topped as songwriters!!! A bit like the Eagles. After Don Felder was fired, something is missing, a great lead player, though the have Joe Walsh and Steuart Smith!!!

Fucking hell! Ronnie is one of the best guitar players ever! That guy is the shit! And he seams more a rolling stone than Mick Taylor

The Mick Taylor, Bobby Keys years were the best of the Stones hands down

did you know that a lot of angry Stones fans, who prefer them in the 1990's, said that Taylor "Overplayed"? LOL. no joke.

@@cultfilmfreakreviews do you smoke crack?

@@cultfilmfreakreviews 🙄

@@cultfilmfreakreviews Not this Stones Fan, I saw them in '69 at the Forum, we were all so excited. Those were the best years IMHO 👍

Mick Taylor came from the Bluesbreakers! with a line up of greats he followed Eric Clapton and Peter Green, he certainly had the pedigree

Truth

@killwill83wrong: Everyone wannabe Mick Jagger!

WHAT,,LIKE A DRAG QUEEN??? LOL

Il est magnifique

Totally agree!

Heck yea Mr.Taylor the best and was the perfect teem with out Mike the Rolling Stones never sounds that good.

Claymore. Charlie has said as much regarding Mick's sheer musical talent!

bluer than blue!

Well said

The Double Mick Stones were the best iteration of that whole genre, though the Brian Jones days were pretty damn good too.

All arguments. The best was the first with Brian. Period.

agree

Which solo ….? Taylor rips two of the best in one song !

@@johnluhm5598 Love in Vain

In the mould of the fabulous Peter Green

I Was Following Her Too... But Not In Vain!!! Come On Now Mick Taylor, Make That Guit-tar Sing My Friend!!! 💞🙏🌻🙏🌷🌷🙏👍😎

@@morristonian Mick was Peter Green at 15

@@morristonian better

Jajaja...de acuerdo!!!

+Alcides MFJr. Les Paul was also what Jimmy Page played correct? awesome

Montgomery Denzer Yes, he (Jimmy Page) played also a Gibson Les Paul. Sometimes,, Mick Taylor played a Gibson SG while Keith Richards played a Fender Telecaster.

And if memory serves (which it probably doesn't) Hendrix played a Stratocaster (backwards)

That's right! He used to play a beautiful white Stratocaster. This fact inspired other great guitar players, like Ritchie Blackmore, to play with a white Strat, too.

So nice to chat with intelligent people. Take care my friend

Ccr

Outstanding!

Yes. Pretty rare at the time, a testament to MTs brilliance.

Mick was 23 in 1972..

I love Mick Taylor's playing, so fluent

It is funny becouse Keith Richards hated his playing. On the albums Keith would go back and redo almost all of Taylor's parts. It is part of the reason he quit the band. Ron Wood was famous when he joined and would take none of that shit.

Ray Pellerin what lol .. Keith couldn’t play over Mick Taylor parts if he tried . He left cause he got bored

...

@@StanSwan Ha Ha

Blue Beard that’s because they learnt from the best of the best. Whatever it was about the blues that spoke to the hearts of a bunch of skinny little white boys in post war London, I’m not really sure, but the blues sure speak to people’s hearts. For whatever reason, white people outside of the USA were raised on black music, and have enormous respect for those artists..be it Duke Ellington, Thelonius Monk, Billie Holiday, Sara Vaughan, Robert Johnson, Howlin’ Wolf, Muddy Waters, just to name a tiny few.

Virginia viola For you to understand why white kids in London embraced the blues you have to understand post war Britain. The city was partially destroyed through bombing. Thousands of people killed. Many kids lost there fathers, and there was rationing. Even bread was rationed. The youth had nothing but bomb sites and music. Keith Richards has talked about this. Post war Britain was tough especially if you were working class.

Blue Beard yeah, I do understand. I think it’s more the old blues guys who had trouble understanding lol. Syd Barrett and Roger Waters both lost their Dads, it was what had bonded them, and Roger’s fury was all poured into his music. The evolution of the blues in British music in the ‘60’s is really interesting tho. You had the purists, like John Mayall and the Bluesbreakers, who spawned Pete Green and Fleetwood Mac, then the Stones who created something entirely their own, The Yardbirds, Creme, but then alongside that prog rock was evolving, Floyd, Genesis, early Queen, Bowie then around the arrival of Mick Taylor, the Stones seem to have been more influenced by what was coming out of America, the Flying Burrito Bros, Gram Parsons, they kind of went country rock r’n’b..all I can say is that those of us who were around in the ‘60’s, ‘70’s and even the ‘80’s British music were quite simply spoilt for choice..it was a smorgasbord of brilliant music. And The Beatles of course. It’s funny how it works, there just seem to be moments in history where an amazing generation of people are born and do incredible things, whether it’s science, art, music, literature, medicine, like there’s some sort of giant lighthouse out there, and every so often it’s beam sweeps the planet with genius.

It's like a guitar lesson. His tone is just like wtf. But it should be a lesson to all guitar players on how to play with taste, tone, feeling and enhance the song in a way that just elevates. Just imagine if he just shreds here, it'd sound appalling. It's just the taste here that astounds. It's buttery. Wow.

@Sam Crowson m

@Sam Crowson kkkooooopkkkkk!!!¡

@Sam Crowson !!!!!!!!!¡Plp

Mick Taylor's fingers on the neck are like little mini effects pedals. So much subtle stuff goes on in his playing like exaggerated note bloom and the way his notes bleed into each other and it's all in the touch. The blues dripped and oozed out of the mans fingers.

Hard to beat the era from Beggars Banquet to Some Girls. They made great albums and music from their inception to today but that run in particular made it seem like they could do nothing but right

So true on all counts. The only thing I can't figure is why young musicians now aren't influenced up to their eyeballs to do something similar. Maybe if the Stones last long enough, a scientist will figure a way for Mick, Keith, and company to clone themselves into their 21-year-old selves from 1964, breathe new life into Rock and Roll all over again, then rejuvenate themselves every 50 years or so, and just keep going forever.

@@clarkleach6733 Amen to that!!

@@lisagurkin3455 Right ---- I only hope that when Mick and Keith turn 98, they're still doing what they were doing at 18, 28, 38, etc. ---- and if so, they're still going to be doing it better than anyone that's come along in the last 30 years. And I doubt any of the 18-28-year-olds then will be able to keep up with them. As I am often fond of saying, we're getting younger all the time.

@@clarkleach6733 I think the same!! I don’t know about your family, but my Mom looked younger at 75 - 80. The pics of my older sisters are really funny too, I got most of musical taste from older siblings and they looked like they were in their forties……I picture them dancing in the back bedroom to that great era of music with all those really talented and I mean talented young at the time bands. It brings back some of my most precious memories of my childhood. I had three older siblings and they all had such different tastes in their musical choices, but then a lot of the same. They molded me with a lot of diverse tastes but I’m so fortunate to have had them as my friends and siblings. We had a lot of love between the four of us which can never be topped! I’m sorry Clark! I didn’t mean to get all gushy with you!! 🌞

hahaha

Yeah i bet Keith was pissed

taylors excellent pitch perfect slide work

Sad that so many Stones video focus almost solely on Mick Jagger.

Which Mick, btw?

Yes, indeed!

Especially Hendrix saw him live twice. Very sloppy made a lot of mistakes. Beck was a great guitarist but the music was lacking. Except Blow by Blow.

But Clapton did: Check out his solos on the Cream and Rainbow Concerts versions of "Crossroads": ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-jYC5BcL7YtQ.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-gvLuZsqFMFE.html

You need to download Nasty songs

@@billsmith9966 by The Stones? I'm a musician/music teacher/20th century music historian. I am trying to get a Stones cover band. There were a few in my area. (Philly) I haven't heard from them in years, one went on the national circuit. They charge atleast $2500-$3000 per gig. I want to play deep Tracks like Sway, Loving Cup, Star Star, and Mr. D, C0ck Sucker Blues and some earlier stuff like 2000 man. I have the open G tuning down.

it was the best era, because of him.

Brian Jones is the one who made the stones. Once the twins learned about writing a song and learning music they didng need him anymore.

remember, he had more live playing experience at 20 than they did in their late twenties and in the most famous band (the beatles were done)... and REAL concerts, not girls screaming in 1966 but people expecting Eric Clapton and Peter Green with Mayall... replacing Brian Jones was nothing compared to those guys

​@@cultfilmfreakreviews First because of the quality of the songs, excepted this one great cover.

original by Robert Johnson ;)

@@j.miguel6193 Yes.. Thankfully the Stones loved the old bluesman and shed light to millions of their fans the roots of their inspiration.

Got that right

they aren't so amazing as far as the music, sorry... Jagger is amazing running around the stage at 80 years old, and Keith and Ronnie are amazing to be alive... but the skills of the band have been long gone... their last tour as an actual band was 1982...

@@cultfilmfreakreviews I’ve seen over 100 shows since 1975 ( sadly missed the Mick Taylor years, but saw him on the 50th anniversary tour)and of course they are not as “amazing “ as they were in their prime . Nonetheless , they always put on a great show and people still love to see them. Losing Charlie was devastating and I had apprehension about going , but it was still a great time . Embrace them for who they are now, not what they were 50 years ago .

Yes, Indeed, Mr. Jonhson would be proud of he legacy he left for others!

It actually sort of is a coincidence. No doubt that these solos are amazing, but the stones peaked during the Taylor years mostly because Keith was doing his best writing. Taylor’s rhythm parts are kind of boring strumming of full chords. He’s a great guitar player. But the stones during this period were about way more than guitar solos.

Totally agree, Mick Taylor is still the best guitarist ever for the Rolling Stones, if Taylor doesn't step down, then Keith will forever be the second guitarist, and Ronni never existed, that's a fact

Always will

You mean you to say you like this better than the likes of Taylor Swift, Billie Eilish, and Bad Bunny!?!? Sacrilege...Geez (Roll Eyes). Mick Taylor's guitar solos --- and The Stones --- will still be the standard bearers 50 years from now, and 50 years from then, and even longer after the aforementioned 3 upchucks and their so-called music have long since gone the way of the dinosaur.

@@clarkleach6733 "Bad Bunny"? I wonder if he's related to Bigg Bunny from that Kate Hudson comedy.

@@whisky2roxy You got me --- All I know for certain is that I wouldn't let my ears, sensibilities, or taste in music touch his rapper horriblations with 10-foot eardums --- let alone any drums Charlie Watts ever used.

Yes, definitely the best band on the planet 💙💙💙💙

tell your 20 year old son to grow up

HOPE YOU GIVE HIM A TISSUE TO WIPE THE TEARS. 😥😥😥. PEACE TO YOU ALL MY FRIEND'S. ✌️😎🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿

Very tasty.

Reminds me of my warm-up exercises in 1st position major: very same-same and not really very melodic.

@@hangarharris oh!

Taylor unappreciated compared to English guitar household names like Clapton, Page, and Beck even Peter Green and Alvin Lee

Dont let mick Taylor looking like a nice guy fool you. I bet he was farting on chicks after skeeting in their hair

that's because The Stones haven't been this good for a long time

Total agree sir ...MT Amazing

Well I hope ya still got your feet on the right side of a grave......we got old ...

The Stones were very creatively savvy. Despite their self-professed "Yobbo" image, they were all sophisticates from middle-class backgrounds who surrounded themselves with creative dynamos

Jagger said the camera was on a loop that would move to another shot regardless of who was on screen. I'm glad it caught MT. He was the best guitarist they ever had

Mick Jagger is one of the best vocalists in the world. Easily.

Shiva

Perhaps casual fans do take Jagger's vocal prowess for granted, but he is one of the greatest singers that has ever lived. His phrasing and vocal textures are unique and unmistakably his own. Not only that, he can sing ANYTHING--country, rock, blues, gospel/soul, jazz, folk, you name it. Even more amazingly, his instrument has held up better than any of his peers. His voice still sounds great.

@@fuchsiaswing8545 you speak the truth... as a main fan of opera/classical, I value above all honesty and devotion to drama in vocal performances which Jagger has in spades...

@@jx14aby i like your sentiment but if one guy was taken for granted it was the kid who played a solo that no other stone before or after could muster... the stones needed a guitar god during the guitar god era they found themselves in, about to tour and re-prove themselves, now the greatest after the beatles broke up and in a world of Jimi, Eric, Jimmy, Jeff, etc...... Ron Wood would not have worked out when they had to prove perfection... he slid in there after The Stones became a kind of endearing trainwreck of rock/blues... or, he turned them INTO that... I'm sorry but, Ron Wood fit, yes... visually more than Taylor... but as a player he was too much like Keith and while they weave good they could never progress to anything new and amazing like Mick Taylor did for only four studio albums which, on brought them higher and higher, and made Keith sound better too

I like to think that if R. Johnson could listen by miracle this cover, appreciated it and smile.

@killwill83 I disagree He is a unique vocalist, his phrasing and feel for a song is incredible Only problem is he tended to bark out lyrics live in the 70’s He is a unique vocalist his vocals for Angie are spine tingling No one else can do that like him He’s not a conventional singer, they are a dime a dozen, he’s Mick Jagger and he’s one of a kind and brilliant

how can we NOT talk about Mick Taylor.

Charlie.

Yeah it does grow on ya

Neither do I. That's undoubtedly their best live version of love in vain on World. Well, but that's no wonder, cause this was in 1972 when the stones had mick taylor with them and this was just their best time(apart from maybe the one with Brian Jones).

Heh, loike, sonly Rock n Roll, loike, y'know...

@@centoeberhardt1663 maybe but the Stones were able to move on & make a name for themselves need less to say for the 🌎. Love u guys more that u know. 👅👅👅👅💨💨💨💨

Už to poslouchám po 5té..nemohu se nabažit... . ❤🇨🇿

He still kicks it in the ass when he hit the stage in Europe 60 yrs tour. U did the best Job. Please take some time off & come to the States when u can. 👅👅👅💨💨💨💨

The greatest rock n roll band ever! Wow is all I can say!

For sure! Jagger is the second best Mick and Keith is the second most soulful guitarist in the Stones whenever Taylor is there.

BadgerVito Second only to Duane

The only other Les Paul tone that comes close is Mark Knopfler performing Brothers in Arms on the Monseratt DVD!

Luther Dickinson...Black Crowes, Ain't got nothing at all, Artists den....

Don felder has a sweet tone on one of these nights that I just can never find. Probably because it's a 59 and mines a traditional from 2007 😂😂😂