The fact that whoever wrote this actually said "CGI voice" shows how out of touch they are with the movie and tv making process especially visual effects and animation, unless a character is maybe a robot artificial voices are basically never used even if the actor is never seen on screen and just their character is, it's pretty normal that a character like matthew would be voiced by a real person, if it was artificial it would actually be quite abnormal and no one would call it a "CGI voice" lmao
The casting of the Sandman is true brilliance. Everyone played their character with full envy and passion. I have to say that Dream is probably my fav, because of his development due his screentime. But I also really loved Lucifer, Desire and Death performances. Can't wait to see them all in season 2!
Have loved ❤ Charles Dance for ages, he's been great in everything he has ever acted. Love ❤ his bad guy in Sandman too... great show all. Thanks Neil Gaiman, a great imagination 💜💜💜
If Gal Gadot did not want to continue as Wonder Woman, Ryazan Jamal looks like she could be “the next” one. She has that look like what you would think of Diana Prince. Charles Dance is a great actor. He also made for a scary vampire in the vampire movie starring Luke Evans.
Whoever wrote this definitely has a gender age bias. The men are praised for their performances at their ages. The women’s ages are mentioned carefully. Even if they are the same age the men are “just”.
I just had a crush on Dream once I watched the show. then become new fan of Tom. then just realised we're same age n zodiac. lol. terrible on relationships?? yup😅
The thumbnail for this video is offensive! You're making people out to be couples who aren't. And I am no homophobe! You're just using these pictures to people to watch your video and I understand that's what a lot of people do. But where I draw the line is using lies to draw people in. The big star in your thumbnail is not even in the video and you make it look like he is gay and that this person in Sandman is his partner because you have the word hot couples next to it. Low blow!
I love the comic BUT, "The Lord of The Rings" won 12 Academy Awards with ZERO sex scenes! Just saying! 😉I just don't understand why they think that having more sex and gay relationships in a show will attract more audience, ratings, or whatever. 😕
Because that’s how life is. Sandman shows what the world actually is like through fantasy story telling. Where as TLOTR (fantastic series) is pure fantasy with metaphors portraying our world. Also what’s wrong with showing sex and gay couples. It’s not for ratings, it’s just inclusive and relatable. Also a human and an elf a fantasy creature fell in love in TLOTR ,which in its time was seen as strange. My point is if you read the comics you’ll have more knowledge on what the Sandman is.
@@sasha-mq4pq that’s not true, it may seem that way if you view relationships as separate depending on the sex. There are many types of relationships through out the series. Sandman focuses on so much more than relationships and delves deep into darker and more subconscious dreaming about existence.
But the Lord of the Rings Movies also diviated from the Source Material to be more accessible to modern audiences. Arwen is a Non-character in the books. In the first books she is only mentioned in a side sentence, mainly to describe how beautiful she is with not much else in Characterization. And i dont think she gas any dialog that is any form relevant to the plot.And they expended Eowyn so that there at least some female characters.
