I’m confused because the video is titled “how the international Space Station Was built” and they really didn’t talk about how it was ACTUALLY built in outer space and the only thing they actually discussed was really WHO MADE some of the nodes, and they didn’t even show us exactly HOW EACH NODE WAS MADE which I think shoulda deff be included in this video since we’re talking about how the ISS was made so I think that parts QUITE important, don’t ya think? I deff do.
@@matthewjdouglas6471 its so vast that the chance it is going to hit something is like your neighbor throwing a rock from across the street and hitting you in your back yard. Probly wont happen.
The people that built this are some of the most intelligent and creative people on the planet. A large portion of the population celebrate ignorance. And unfortunately, they are usually much louder than the intelligent ones.
@@tae6658 An international space station is a waste of resources, there is nothing on space, the human being is not an intergalactic traveler or an space voyager, that is Hollywood, those are fantasies.
@@fabi57iamracer i don't agree with your logic, but if we have this much of resources why had they stopped ocean exploration and focused on space? While knowing our own planet is more essential to us, only 80% of our ocean are only explored meanwhile they've put billions of budget to conquer the moon and have a station on space.
Do the math. It would be impossible to see what you’ve been fooled into thinking you’ve seen. It is physically impossible to see an object that size at that distance. It’s not a space station that travels above.
@@tgstudio85 Hi Dad. Love the kiddo stuff! LOL! Nice to have comedic relief when dealing with the morons who are responsible for the death of freedom and truth. The math? Well, as you'll see if you look, there are varying numbers out there. The ISS is supposedly around 109 meters and allegedly travels around 200 miles above the earth. Do you think you can see an object that isn't too much larger than a football field at 200 miles away? Again, thanks for the comic relief! It would be physically impossible to see it at that height. What we see is very, very likely a plane with cloaking tech, which does exist. It can project an image of the sky behind to make it look invisible or project whatever it wants. I don't claim to know for sure what it is, but I do know for sure using science that what it is not. The alleged ISS isn't some spot light and to think it would reflect as it supposedly does in various colors too it laughable. Too easy to school you, dad. :P
@DeusVult1527 don't think that's true, and even if it was, what would that even mean? That the brightest technical minds managed to make long lasting materials?
@DeusVult1527 first of all, that's just a different thing, an airplane has a level of wear and tear because it has a lot of moving parts, does not cost $150 billion, and is constantly exposed to the wind, rain, and general atmosphere that the space station is completely above
Only 10 times faster than the fastest... or to put it another way, only Mach 23 around a spinning space-ball that's actually moving at Mach 86. As it keeps up with a sun moving Mach 670. Gotta love space-maffs.
@@IronHorse1722 using speed of sound to measure orbital speeds is dumb, as if you'd have received basic education you'd know that there is no air or any other thing to transfer sound.
@@Am_Yeff and if you'd received basic education you'd know that most twerps like you have no concept of what real speeds beyond supersonic actually means. That's why I apply a standard of 1-sonic, an average of 767 MPH, to describe really large speeds. Otherwise they're clearly meaningless to the average person. When a fighter-jet creates a sonic-boom that shakes the house and sometimes even shatters windows (obviously why they're not allowed to fly in residential areas any more), it's an experience you don't quickly forget. That's just one-mach. So when a person has enough education, intelligence, and life-experience to understand what a Mach is, they know you don't need to apply it to the speed of sound in an atmosphere for it have a meaningful value. It's one "reallyfuckingfast" value. If you're stupid enough to believe that the ground beneath you rotates 1.35 times faster than that, then you've got serious cognitive issues. If you THEN have to extrapolate from someone using such a description to imply speed is "uneducated" because sound doesn't move in a vacuum, then you've failed life. Find another hobby. Become a daisy-farmer or something.
It's simply amazing how the human being accomplished such feats. Even with the unfortunate lessons that were learned by the loss of life on the discovery disaster. NASA picked up the pieces of their error and came back with what is considered to be a perfect come back and proved to the world the space station was the come back of such disaster. And that the lives of the martyr astronauts wasn't in vain. Congratulations to these gifted people who decided to dedicate their lives for the well being of the future of humanity!
13:48, jet propulsion laboratory: may I help you? Germany: hey buddy the wiring connectors wrong they don't match up! Jet propulsion Laboratory: oh, you didn't get the adapter, it was in the bag with the instructions.
This is also why we lose reception in rural areas or out ay sea. Which can not be helped unless they start putting more signal poles in these places which then would become WAY too obvious. If all we need is uhm `satellites` cough cough cough then they would have sorted this issue out by now and there would be no problem in these outer areas. Oh , and again, WAKE UP!!
hhris C What had You expected? To see astronauts soar around with screwdrivers, putting the bits together? The modules were prefabricated, ready to just ”click on”.
SO, SO SORRY, there are still some kids not much younger than I, that defend the position that we never even went to the moon! my father was heavily involved in the space program NASA/Air Force. without him even divulging a single (secret) I do not have a shadow of a dought that We Were There. it really is a shame, all the lives lost and risked gone unrecogonized. I am celebrating, thank you Bibi.
It is fake. Their is no ISS. Earth is flat and motionless and there is no such thing as space travel or things magically floating in the air at 17,000 mph.
@@danielmconnolly7YEP! What a joke that countries can and happily still ❤go to war on each other to invade and plunder the others resources, got as much as they can get from it. Yet most of the worlds countries seem to have an invisible force field agreement not to mess with The continent of Antarica.......Liddle bit weird but probs just a Crazy chance coincidence
@Charles West real question...do you literally believe nasa gives you real footage? You think they're changing gaskets in space? I've never seen anything like it. Link me some footage of a mechanical error being fixed. I've tried. Non existing
@@redlightrunner930 never seen anybody do anything useful on the stupid fake station. Just play with toys & food like big goofy children. It's a brainwashing device.
Beautifully said, I tell my folks these words everyday. It's good to save money but most people don't understand the market moves and tend to be misled in facts like this and always depend on money in the bank.
Of those 574, three people only reached a sub-orbital flight, 567 people reached Earth orbit, 24 traveled beyond low Earth orbit and 12 walked on the Moon. Space travelers have spent over 29,000 person-days (or a cumulative total of over 77 years) in space including over 100 person-days of spacewalks.
Can someone tell Nasa and or Elon Musk that they can literally strap me to an SRB or Falcon 9 and blast me to space. I don't even gotta be in the rocket. Just strap me to the external side of the booster with a pressurized suit and 30 minutes of oxygen.
@Trebor I still like him and his podcasts, he definitely has some really interesting insights on many subjects but I see what you mean, he has some strange views that I wouldn't agree with (mostly conspiracy theories)
I'm asmelash gebremariam (below) from Ethiopia tigray let's helping and working together all worldwide humabing to humabing , longlife for all worldwide humabing
Another doc that tries to explain how ISS was made without mentioning that phase 1 of the project (formerly non-international Liberty Station project) was learning on Mir station.
@Black Duk not necessarily, you don't even need a doctorate, military experience, or the ability to speak another language, you just need to be a scientist who's accomplished in their field, and you need to pass the astronaut physical and mental tests
Absolutely it’s possible. I knew a guy who was selected from the military for the astronaut program but was thrown out of the military for steroids. Dummy Work as hard as you can on your education. There’s a way.
That was the problem. No launch should be textbook. Not enough checks were made because expectations were that it was text book. No one was looking for problems at any stage.
No construction footage at all . Now go request footage of the trade center construction. Easy. Satisfying. Because it was actually constructed. No CGI needed.🤔
"Did you know the ISS was constructed by parts in space?" No way, you must be kidding right? There's no way something so fucking cool like that actually happened right? Well, I was clearly wrong.
I am still looking of how it was assembled initially, the first flights, first parts. All videos show the ISS already built, they show just supplies and maintenance.
Starting at ~15:44: This is what I hate about working in high tech projects. Some manager oaf who is barely capable of putting on his pants every day complaining.
they needed such talk because they knew they were filmed :) managers always think that such talks put plus on their profile..but it is not true, they are actually showing that they are bad managers..Gunter is the best
love your show & spacex. We traveled to Boca Chica to the the starshing get built. & we got the S dual motor fsd last Christmas 🎄 😎 still have the cybertruck tri motor or 4 motor fsd on order, i got lots of solar & backup battery system to charge them both. love tsla stock
Objectively speaking, the first element of the ISS is the functional cargo unit "Zarya", built in Russia. The launch was carried out using the Russian "Proton-K" launch vehicle. According to this video, the "Canadian arm" seems to be the most important element.
Actually, there have been 5 structural components added since the shuttle left in 2011, most recently the Nauka and Prichal modules by the Russians in 2020. You don't need a shuttle to build a space station. Skylab proved that in 1973 that cheaper rockets can do the job. It's just that at one point, NASA thought that the shuttle would be cheaper transportation, but it wasn't.
Does this strike anyone as maybe some BS? How come we don't have videos of this all happening? Wouldn't you think that every second of this monumental feat would have been documented via the best tech at the time?
Puma You clearly haven't bothered to look. You'd probably say they were fake anyway. There is so much info online for all to check out so if it's important then get off your ass and make an effort.
if you drive a car 100 miles per hour, and if i drive another car next to you at 100 miles per hour. our relative speed is 0 we can touch each other and dock if we touch very very gently have you ever seen how airplanes get refueled in flight? principle is the same. and in space there is no air resistance slowing you down.
The first missions used spacesuits to breathe. The first two modules didn't have any life support. It was unoccupied for two years. Then, they took some oxygen with them. Later, the oxygen generators on Zvezda made more, from water. Later, a second system was installed with the Destiny module.
Oh I don't know...hmmm...where could they be?Wait,wait,wait,I got it!Maybe try with that thing,how it's called.......oh yea, internet.Just copy your own comment without "where's the" and paste it in the google search engine like I did and that's it but even after that your believes are covered,you can always say magic word,it's CGI. Greetings from Planet Earth.
@@robydee920 go on then, prove me wrong. Megastructures type documentary of a few professional pilot astronauts putting together a huge structure in space. I'll wait but I'll apologize if I'm wrong
Those are portions built by the USA. There are portions built by Russia that have the russian flag. There is an arm built by Canada that has the canadian flag. Stop talking please.
Not really, NASA manned spaceflight accounts for LESS than 1% of the US budget. Plus the money gets reinvested back in the economy creating jobs. Given that waste in other areas is even greater, I would start someplace besides NASA to find savings.
Lol at 3.40 minutes in, the global network that has gone into making the international space station a reality... as they sink a suited-up astronot into the pool. Truer words, never spoken.
Mrs Richards: "I paid for a room with a view !" Basil: (pointing to the lovely view) "That is Torquay, Madam." Mrs Richards: "It's not good enough!" Basil: "May I ask what you were expecting to see out of a Torquay hotel bedroom window? Sydney Opera House, perhaps? the Hanging Gardens of Babylon? Herds of wildebeest sweeping majestically past?..." Mrs Richards: "Don't be silly! I expect to be able to see the sea!" Basil: "You can see the sea, it's over there between the land and the sky." Mrs Richards: "I'm not satisfied. But I shall stay. But I expect a reduction." Basil: "Why?! Because Krakatoa's not erupting at the moment?"
@@paulvamos7319External fuel tank is a giant helium filled blimp that is painted to look like a rusty metal tank. Strap an empty aluminium soda can shaped like a "shuttle" to it then duct tape two giant fireworks to both of them and call it a space launch.........HELIUM FILLED BLIMP
@@paulvamos7319 As stated Helium. NASA is the largest consumer of helium in our world. All their Giant Satelloons need it as much as there old "external" fuel tank blimps needed it.
floating but in space weightless space walking that's how you experience microgravity fundamental research that is absolutely impossible to perform on the surface of the earth
if only we had an international measurements oh wait we do its called the metric system but we Americans don't like it and I am not going to explain but I will say that we need to convert to it completely for just such a reason cuz astronauts have enough to worry about even with complete trust for the engineers
They literally use the metric system for space and aviation already. They're in line with the standards when it matters. I use them interchangeably. Interesting
