Тёмный

The Shared Source of Irregular Rhythms and Dissonant Intervals! 

Подписаться
Просмотров 1,2 тыс.
% 79

This is the fifth, penultimate, video in a series that discusses the acoustical foundations of all musical parameters and how this has guided musical development since the Middle Ages.
In the previous video, we explored the idea that pitch and rhythm are not just related but are fundamentally the same thing! Here we investigate how this applies to the higher frequency ratios of the harmonic series and how even the most complex irregular rhythms can be derived from the same ratios that create dissonant intervals!
We trace this with reference to composers who are notable for their contributions to rhythmic devilment in the 20th Century including Igor Stravinsky, Olivier Messiaen, Henry Cowell and Conlon Nancarrow.
Subscribe for more on music history & theory:
www.youtube.com/@robertlennonmused/videos
I hope this video will inspire you to explore the topic further. Thanks for watching!
ru-vid.com/group/PLJIYoKYPoF-ZyILw22c6Nz-JxAMbC_eRt Subscribe for more on music history & theory: ru-vid.com/show-UCGZTxQG9kSfIwcUvdJ0uBMA
Any questions? Please leave a comment below or contact me at: info@robertlennonmusic.com
Chapters;
00:00 Opening Titles
00:18 Introduction
01:03 Rhythmic & Metrical Ambiguity
03:28 Igor Stravinsky
04:35 'The Rite of Spring' - Rhythmic & Metrical Innovations
07:31 Olivier Messiaen - Additive Rhythm
08:29 Non-Retrogradable (Palindromic) Rhythms & Relationship to the Harmonic Series
10:31 Henry Cowell - Consonant & Dissonant Rhythms
11:37 Analysis of Frequency Ratios in Consonant & Dissonant Rhythms
13:02 Challenges of Practicality - the Rhythmicon
13:57 Conlon Nancarrow - the Player Piano
15:06 Summary of Contributions of Both Cowell & Nancarrow
16:08 Looking Forwards to the Next & Final Video
16:25 Conclusion

Видеоклипы

Опубликовано:

 

14 фев 2023

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 15   
@jimbowayoutub2
@jimbowayoutub2 Год назад
This whole series is fantastic Robert. I sincerely hope you continue.
@robertlennonmused
@robertlennonmused Год назад
Many thanks! One more to do.
@thundercat7746
@thundercat7746 8 месяцев назад
I'm quite enthrilled to have discovered your channel by chance from my curiosity. Trying to use this for my accordion and future structuring is going to be fun and helpful. Can't wait for the next episode.
@utkugercik6661
@utkugercik6661 8 месяцев назад
Underrated watching counts. Please do it more.
@Birbeniho
@Birbeniho 2 месяца назад
Great video, Thank you
@hisnibs1121
@hisnibs1121 4 месяца назад
A very interesting and informative series. Thank you. I am surprised you did not mention, even if only in passing, embodiment as a potential factor in the unequal influence of timbre on melody/harmony versus rhythm. Put simply, can you dance to it? 😀 You had considered embodiment (though without explicitly noting it) when you considered the influence of the range of men's and boys' voices in the development of harmony from plainsong. My inexpert take on it (as a mere bass player😁) is that in 'music' the influence of the naturally occurring ratios in regular materials (strings, tubes, etc.) confronts, and is tempered by, the logistics of the human body: in melody/harmony e.g. the human audible range etc, and in rhythm to what extent can you 'shake a tail feather' - tap a foot or hand, nod a head, bounce from one leg to the other, swing your arms, etc. The music that is so 'unplayable' by humans that it has to be produced by machines, is also going to be very difficult to relate to bodily. That's not to say there shouldn't be music that you can't dance to, but that it will be experienced as something in opposition to that which one can have an obvious bodily response to. I say the above in the spirit of discussion, rather than as a criticism. I've found it a very illuminating and thought provoking series. Thank you.
@robcavender8437
@robcavender8437 Год назад
A really excellent exploration of a fiendishly complex concept. I loved the revelation of the palindromic nature of tonal relations as rhythm.
@robertlennonmused
@robertlennonmused Год назад
Thanks very much. I'm really pleased you found it interesting.
@cedfi0z
@cedfi0z 5 месяцев назад
This series is wonderful! Is one more video coming?
@robertlennonmused
@robertlennonmused 5 месяцев назад
Thank you very much! Yes, one more on the way - just not sure when!
@CROOK778
@CROOK778 Год назад
This series was fascinating and everything that I was looking for when my curiosity piqued about sound and harmony, and more! I have a question for you. In this series you have discussed harmony and rhythm and how they relate to natural overtones, but do you think that melody can be addressed with the same sort of mathematical approach? If physics is responsible for the origin of harmony and rhythm, what about melody? I'm curious about your thoughts. Thank you!
@BrunoWiebelt
@BrunoWiebelt Год назад
good study material for me .. starting late with my theoretical education att 64. thank you for the material
@robertlennonmused
@robertlennonmused Год назад
Happy that it's useful!
@ryanpower724
@ryanpower724 11 месяцев назад
Amazing stuff. How does one go about trying to compose their own materials using ratios for rhythm, harmony timbre?
@robertlennonmused
@robertlennonmused 11 месяцев назад
Thank you! I'm intending to share some ideas in answer to your question in the next episode.