The Sony 70-350mm G OSS Impressed Me

Подписаться 219 тыс.

Просмотров 275 тыс.

50% 1

With its huge focal range, excellent sharpness, fast/silent/accurate focus, and built in OSS, the Sony 70-350mm is finally a great telephoto lens I can recommend for Sony APSC users.
Buy your 70-350mm on Amazon: amzn.to/2Z89RrX
Or on B&H here: bhpho.to/30KHgss
FILMED WITH:
Sony A6600: amzn.to/2X23K8i
Sigma 56mm: amzn.to/3hzGWpW
Overkill Gimbal: amzn.to/2RsIhn9
M Y G E A R :
Cameras -
📷 WHAT I USE TO RECORD: geni.us/qEib
📷 BACKUP CAMERA: geni.us/eWBG
📷 BEST STARTER/BUDGET CAMERA: geni.us/Ujn1TC3
📷 BEST FULL FRAME FOR THE $$$: geni.us/8PxAj
Lenses -
❤️ MY #1 MOST RECOMMENDED LENS: geni.us/BbGlnB
❤️ BEST PORTRAIT LENS: geni.us/bvwq
❤️ BEST ULTRAWIDE LENS: geni.us/ARXj
❤️ BEST DO-EVERYTHING LENS: geni.us/dDLwY
❤️ WHAT I FILM MY VIDEOS WITH: geni.us/ojGKI
❤️ MY FAVORITE CHEAP/MANUAL LENS: geni.us/cQoztp
Accessories -
🔋🔋 CAMERA BATTERIES: geni.us/TXaeo3B
🎤 AUDIO RECORDER: geni.us/L5dejj
🎤 MICROPHONE: geni.us/O8UzW
⚙️ BEST CHEAP TRIPOD: geni.us/4uf5
⚙️ BEST GIMBAL: geni.us/iYiy
⚙️ SD CARD: geni.us/7BhUrBj
🛒 SHOPPING ON AMAZON? geni.us/yn7t0 (Paid Amazon Link)
🌍 OUTSIDE OF THE US? USE THIS LINK: geni.us/ezoD (Paid Amazon Link)
🎦 MY E-MOUNT PAGE: www.amazon.com...
👧🏼 MY WIFE'S RU-vid: goo.gl/P7D5RW
🖼️ INSTAGRAM: / arthur213
DISCLOSURES:
I participate in the Amazon Affiliates Program, where I earn a small commission if you decide to purchase an item at no cost to you.
I participant in the B&H Affiliates Program, an affiliate advertising program in which I earn commissions by linking to bhphoto.com at no cost to you.
MUSIC: Sapphieros - You
Soundcloud / sappheirosmusic
Spotify goo.gl/hE9MDJ
Twitter / sappheirosmusic
DOWNLOAD: fanlink.to/chfk

Опубликовано:

29 сен 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 409

@swonghobby 4 года назад

I just purchased this lens two or three days ago and I've been very impressed. The size is much smaller then i expect. I took it out and did some comparison with the 55 to 210 just like you did. It blows it all of the water. I go to an airshow a couple times a year and I had been renting. This lens is just perfect. I was not impressed with the 70-300. Rented it one year and didn't look back. This will work out for me just fine.

@dpullen42 4 года назад

I love this lens, use it to photograph Eagles while kayaking. 525mm zoom is great for getting close to the Eagles and I get super sharp photos. I have noticed if lighting is not perfect the auto focus does struggle sometimes.

@DjimmyTrovy 4 года назад

Gorgeous lens. It's very sharp, doesn't lose contrast when zoomed in, the autofocus is very fast and silent. It is consistent throughout the zoom range and across the image frame. A total gem from Sony. Love it.

@uandersonbrittes6526 4 года назад

How come a f6.3 could ever be a gem?

@slam5 4 года назад

@Foto4Max the 100-400 is also much more expensive too. if i remember, 100-400 has that fancy motor inside.

@akirahojo2 4 года назад

Foto4Max considering the slow autofocus would it be a poor choice for bird photos? The 100-400 is an FE right?

@SamraatShukla 4 года назад

I was thinking... what if meike extension tubes attached to 70-350... Can we click close portrait photos with super bokeh? I don't have tele photo lens... so i cannot try. Can anyone tell me what is does? I request you to make video with extension tubes with different lenses please

@Noeline999 4 года назад

@@SamraatShukla I use Mieke extension tubes with the kit 55-210. It's a cheap way to try out macro and I've been super impressed with the results.

@Bit85 4 года назад

I got this lens a few weeks ago. Finally got out to the zoo to test it and was very happy with the results!

@Princeton_James 4 года назад

That's awesome. That's where I would plan to use it the most.

@JoshN614 4 года назад

Did you have the 55-210 before this? Any comparison thoughts?

@Bit85 4 года назад

@@JoshN614 I didnt. The longest lens I had was the 18-135. I bought the lens for a trip I'm taking to Africa in the spring. It's a once in a life time trip for us so I wanted to make sure I had the best equipment I had available to me!

@clarification007 4 года назад

@@Bit85 / I would love to hear your feed back from your trip!

@keszocaj 4 года назад

Would be great to see a comparison Sony 70-350 vs new Sigma 100-400.

@samuelhrobon7039 3 года назад

Great review! I'm using it with my A6400 and it's great in sharpness and AF in good conditions but it can have focus issues when shooting on 350 mm in low light situations (mostly slight backfocus). In that cases you have to adjust manually.

@stang8913 4 года назад

Been waiting for it! 55-210 is the only tele I have got now. Expect to get this one soon.

@djremotion2 3 года назад

I have now had this lens from Sony for testing on for few weeks and I really did not expect to even try it really. But instead I found the lens to be quite awesome actually and it made me to be more interested in telephoto. It really is useful hand held even in pretty dark and long range. Good lens unlike 18-210 which I have some years a go for few months and found it to be just annoyingly bad toy.

@chelmerbear 2 года назад

How do people have a £700 lens just lying around that they don't even plan on trying lol?

@jaredalbin5658 7 месяцев назад

Wow what lens and camera are you using walking around with the fire pit in the background- that is super clean - crystal clear!

@Elgsdyr 4 года назад

Note that the price of this lens is relatively more expensive in the US than the rest of the world. Apparently, because it's produced in China. Here in Denmark the 70-300mm is 8900 DKK while the 70-350mm is 6900 DKK in street prices. I think you mentioned they were priced the same (in the US).

@andybyford8886 3 года назад

Picked this beauty up for £540. Definitely worth it!

@tinplater 4 года назад

I'm really enjoying the 70-350. I wish it had a bit more contrast, but that is easily fixed in PP.

@scottw1174 3 года назад

I just bought this lense yesterday, excited about it

@NozzerMW3 3 года назад

Hi there.. Great review as usual. I’ve just purchased this lens and really impressed. I put it on my Sony /vct-vpr1 tripod and to be honest it’s very insecure and not at all steady at 350mm. Would you recommend a different tripod or using some kind of support rig?... regards John

@deeptweshdm2536 3 года назад

Is the bokeh good enough to get some good wild life portraits?

@saifaldin_ 3 года назад

One way to help imagine the DOF you'll be getting with a lens is by taking the focal length and divide by the aperture. So in this case 350/6.3 = 55.56. The bigger the number, the shallower DOF. Then you compare with a lens you're familiar with. For example the Sony 35mm f1.8=19.44, Sigma 56mm f1.4=40, Sony 85mm f1.8=47.22. Of course there are various other things at play but at least it's a good place to start.

@TechTagged 4 года назад

Nice presentation as always..need to save up before i can get one for myself.

@acemokla 4 года назад

Great review Arthur! In fact, this lens also performs reli well and reliable even under low light condition on a6600 body!! You might as well test it under low light condition:)

@louieanderson2847 4 года назад

Thank you Arthur, again!

@markusdammasch9108 2 года назад

Just my thoughts... but I reckon this lens would be great with the A1 or A7riv and using these in crop mode... the lens is sharp enough and it would give a long range in a lighter package without sacrificing quality - except for MP but these 2 cameras would offer plenty in APSC mode.

@ImadogGarcia 4 года назад

Me too, owned!

@Zeb.Goodman 11 месяцев назад

Would you still recommend this lens as a good one to pair with the new 6700?

@makarandbhosale667 4 года назад

Hi Arthur great video Can you do review with this lens on sony a6000 Keep up the good work. ✌️

@doplinger1 4 года назад

This might replace my 24-240mm for photographing airshows! Give me that extra reach I need, as long as the light is good.

@mohammadkarimsaleh840 2 года назад

Thanks for best detals. Can I by this lens to my sony alpha a 7 iii?

@tushar673353 4 года назад

G lens have very beautiful images

@EvaKhuroshvili 8 месяцев назад

Would this sense work with Sony A7 IV?

@henrybrandis5455 3 года назад

Have you reviewed the Sigma 100-400? Thanks.

@promocvies 4 года назад

Just got the 18-200 mm for my a6400. Considering that the lens isn't the newest model from Sony, is it still a good purchase?

@aronbeast 4 года назад

Bro you want to make us fall in love with your wife?? She's so pretty and these photos and clips show her character so well!!

@eukaryote-prime 3 года назад

Yikes

@jimmeyer4530 3 года назад

I think most of us are already in love with her.

@brentschmogbert Год назад

Creep

@raviapsunde3196 Год назад

Same feelings mate..

@zerounimatrix6707 Год назад

Damn I'm a straight woman and I feel she's so attractive

@3VAudioVideo 4 года назад

While zooming in, there seems to be a lot of jello. Which Sony A6X00's do that? And at what resolution/fps?

@lenith222 3 года назад

Why a6600 link redirecting to a6400, Sigma 56mm redirecting to Sony 16-55 in description? Links are wrong or tools mentioned are incorrect?

@ArthurR 3 года назад

Not sure - I just fixed them. Thank you!

@rodolfodickson9500 2 года назад

Super helpful

@doer6002 Год назад

I can't decide between these 2 lenses Sony 70-350 vs Sigma 100-400 for my Sony a6000. Just wondering which is the better lens, can anyone advice me on this please? Cheers.

@klucky2908 4 года назад

What is the max. Aperature of the 70-350mm at 300mm?

@PIXELvoiz 4 года назад

felt like i red the manual

@Zadonitz 4 года назад

Gonna wait for the new Tamron!

@PhotosByMackan 4 года назад

When is Tamron going to release something for the APS-C lineup? They only have FF lenses as far as I know for Sony.

@nathanielyee 4 года назад

wait does this work for full frame?

@four-kings 4 года назад

sharp！

@devinhall8038 4 года назад

Arthur R reviewing the Hubble telescope lol

@matteosivilotti9800 4 года назад

Arthur! are you going to make me spend more money? I'm scared to get to the end of this video :D

@clarification007 4 года назад

Same for me! Lol!

@juancatalan3095 4 года назад

same here ! sadly first thing that it came to my mind is the bokeh. It does not seems as awful as the one from 55-210...

@MrMACornwell 4 года назад

Please compare this lens with the Sigma 100-400 (on APSC!!) when it s officially released.

@keystonebrotherb 4 года назад

Should be the next lens comparison. It’s inevitable!

@scs6757 4 года назад

Yes, please, I'm also very interested in how the two compare.

@tinplater 4 года назад

So jealous...I can only manage to get my wife to pull annoyed faces when I try to photograph her!

@shivanksolaris 3 года назад

Same story everywhere.

@a55tech 3 года назад

get an upgrade bro

@h0123920 3 года назад

Universal fact

@richardpcrowe 4 года назад

Bit of background... I shot with Canon gear for years and liked the 100-400mm f/4.6-5.6L IS II lens but looking back, I did not use that lens often enough because of the size and weight to justify the two grand investment in the lens. Switching to Sony, I decided not to buy the 100-400mm or 200-600mm because I didn't think I would use these that often either. However, I purchased the Sony 70-350mm lens to basically replace the Canon 100-400mm. It is 50mm shorter but 30mm wider. It is about a half stop slower at max focal length but I can live with that. I can only use it in a crop format but, I always used the 100-400mm on my crop 7D Mark II. The reason I purchased the lens is that it is significantly smaller than either the Sony 100-400mm or 200-600mm, weighs less than half of what the 100-400mm weighs and one third of what the 200-600mm weighs additionally, it costs 40% of the price of the 100-400mm and about 50% the price of the 200-400mm.... I can live with its shortcomings because of the weight and price.

@biogons14 4 года назад

Have you tried this lens with older APS-C E mount cameras like A6000 or A6500? Any accuracy problem with AF in the long telephoto range?

@UnexpectedTokenJs 2 года назад

@@pablo_costas what about iso value, is required increase it?

@lindsaythompson1670 2 года назад

I'm in love with this lens on my a6300.

@Vern_Levine 4 года назад

Oh my gosh I’m in love with that lens already and that’s just from your pictures. I have the 55-210 and while I use it often I find it frustrating because of the lack of sharpness. This lens goes to the top of my wishlist!

@jamalhalili2173 3 года назад

Would you still recommend buying the 55-210 at the price it falls at now near $/€130?

@Vern_Levine 3 года назад

@@jamalhalili2173 depends on your camera system really. Last year I moved on from the A6000 to the A7RIII. My zoom lens is now a Sigma 100-400. But for average use I’d say the 55-200 is fine. If you have the money I’d strongly recommend going with the Sony 70-350 though because it will be much sharper.

@kamui0523 3 года назад

@@Vern_Levine I have A7RIII too,do you recommend the Sony 70-350 with the Full Frame system? I just wanna blance the weight and quality，so I was wondering if the 18M pics is good enough?

@Vern_Levine 3 года назад

@@kamui0523 I’m not sure on that one. The biggest drawback to the sigma 100-400 is the weight and this lens would be lighter but I’m not sure what the difference in quality would be especially when shooting in crop mode.

@fenraven 3 года назад

This lens, one of my favorites, is also surprisingly sturdy. I accidentally dropped it from a moving bicycle (don't ask!), it hit the tar road hard (along with the a6000 it was attached to) and BOTH were just fine. I still use this lens all the time because of its excellent glass and light weight. I shoot wildlife. I now use it on an a6400.

@nhancao4790 2 года назад

I also have a6400 and consider to get this lens for landscape and outdoor sports. How is the AF performance?

@7784000 Год назад

@@nhancao4790 shooting it on a6400 and the AF is ok for all of my photography so far. But if you consider shooting birds in flight or something in low-light I strongly recommended F2.8 which are quite expensive and designed for fullframe. Maybe you can try it out at a local store by yourself 😉👍

@colmranger 4 года назад

I'd love to hear from birds in flight photographers

@T-Slider 4 года назад

I’m brand new to bird photography. I’ve been to the beach twice. And even though I have nothing that could be called a technique....yet, I’ve been able to catch just enough to know it is going to be excellent for a 350mm lens. Not to be confused with a 600mm FF lens. Now if I could just figure out how to catch them coming toward me instead of away! I’m using it on my a7R4. It’s a very fun lens.

@1023beaner 4 года назад

PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE...do a comparison of this and the new Sigma 100-400....Im begging you...many of us are dying to see this

@SamraatShukla 4 года назад

Yes.. For me too

@keystonebrotherb 4 года назад

Ditto!

@keystonebrotherb 4 года назад

I purchased the Sigma 100-400. Seemed to be the better option for me.

@marior2448 3 года назад

Yes, that would be interesting. I believe they are priced similarly.

@scottroberts3131 3 года назад

I just picked up a used a6600 to replace the a6000, and for something lighter than a7riii for walking around. Thinking of picking this up to make the a6600 my longer range weapon. Any issues with having enough light on cloudy days or in general? Also deciding if I should just get the 16-55 g first...I do already have compact full frame primes. Just wanted to say hi and accepting of input. Have a good one!

@mickkev 4 года назад

There is a $100 price drop. Go buy it before the price goes back.

@matthewingram5478 4 года назад

Thanks for this! I watch a lot of tutorials and have to read between the lines in order to make a decision for myself, but this covers my exact situation. I shoot with an a6400, have the 55-210 and the 18-135 that I shoot with regularly, but am considering this 70-350 or the FE70-300 to kick things up a notch. Do you also use a full frame Sony? I don't know if I'll ever upgrade but am wondering if it's worth getting the 70-300 for potential FF use in the future. And how'd you feel about low light performance on this 70-350? Heard it's not great on the 70-300... Thanks!

@aldimaulanaadrianto 4 года назад

Maybe in the next video u can write the focal lenght and aperture for every single sample bcs that help us to expect

@beaumiffle 4 года назад

Why does he always start his intro walking out of a jungle

@DanielConstant00 4 года назад

lmbo

@caldera878 4 года назад

Because Texas.

@andarapz8086 4 года назад

because he is not sponsored by squarespace

@amitkrupal1234 4 года назад

Look at his logo(Lion)

@BigBoss-gb4cx 4 года назад

He's slowly turning into Steve Irwin.

@HSNG10 4 года назад

I got this lens. It's great and I even use it on a7riii apsc mode for 525mm reach. Sharp and nice. It's cheaper then the 70300G, and lighter since it''s apsc.

@joseortiz6255 4 года назад

I have a Sony A6000 and a Sony FE 70-300mm and I love that combination... My hobby is airplane photography... Greetings from Puerto Rico...

@Flyinghigh-s1f 3 года назад

wow how is it for aviation photography

@Pointsnapremovecap Год назад

I know this is a few years old but just purchased a Tamron 70-300 to go on my new to me a6500. I really haven’t been impressed with the Tamron, not bad but not great. My biggest issue was the insane lens creep. I watched this video along with a bunch of you other videos before buying the Tamron, very informative. I figured I would save some money and get the Tamron. After rewatching this I’m sending the Tamron back and getting the Sony. Found one used like new on Amazon for just a few hundred more than the Tamron. I think the extra features like zoom and focus lock will make it worth it. Thank you for all the videos, you are my go to when I have questions about the APS-C line.

@keithancajas4623 3 года назад

this might sound stupid but i'm still trying to understand lenses.. i have the sony 16-55 2.8 as a gift.. what's the difference in use case between the two?

@eltondioquino 3 года назад

Hi Arthur, I've been following you for how many years now. And one of the reasons I bought my sony aps-c from A6000 to A6400 is because of your review. Now I've been using kitlens for how many years then I updgraded my lens to Sigma 16MM and eventualy Sony 18-105. Recently I've been using my sony 18-105 because of its zoom capabilities but I dont really appreciate the sharpness of that lens. Though its good for video. Anyways as of the moment I am capturing some wild life animals like birds and Im looking for telephoto lens. I am eyeing this lens but I am turn between Sigma 100-400 and Sony 30-350. I just wanted to know your insights. I am looking for dual purpose not only shooting wild life animals but also some portrait photography and some landscape. Hope you can give me insights. I really appreciate it. Thank you in advance! Cheers!

@maviniii 2 года назад

Hi, did you decide between Sigma or Sony? If so, why did you choose it and which one it good for lowlights? Thanks 😊

@eltondioquino 2 года назад

@@maviniii hi honestly I did not choose either one. I bought tamron 70-180mm not really a super zoom lens but it work pretty well. Dis moat of the job. Im planning to buy the tamron 150-500. Just a quick advice and base from personal experience dont buy a pricey lens specially if its crop sensor bcoz eventually you will upgrade to full frame. Yeah it happened ro me i am now using sony a7iii so I need to have full frame lens. I still have a6400 but still need to pick a lens that work both. So i am happy I did not bought the crop lens. Sigma maybe okay but I guess it srll lacks on auto focus base on my research. Cheers

@maviniii 2 года назад

@@eltondioquino thanks so much for your feedback. I’ve been thinking about to get a full frame camera, but I just bought the a6400 recently, maybe in the future then. Your comment was very helpful sir, thanks so much again. Cheers

@eltondioquino 2 года назад

@@maviniii you are very welcome! I am in the same problem of which one to choose. Anyways glad it helped. Thanks!

@amitkrupal1234 4 года назад

Just finalised on A6400 with Sony 16-70 f4, 70-350 G, confused btw Sigma 56 f/1.4 or Sigma 30 f/1.4. Please help me finalise btw this 2 lens & suggest an wide angle lens for landscapes. I love to travel on my Cruiser, this Sony APS-C is almost half the weight wrt their equivalent FF lenses.

@AiurMedia 4 года назад

changed channel name to Arthur but still look like a mafia in every video

@dgross2009 4 года назад

I'm sure he was forced to by the oligarchs at Google. That other name was just too descriptive of the channel it is on

@zolwikwkurwik 3 года назад

Bought it today new for 550usd

@themanunleashed 2 года назад

I'm just a hobbyist and I think I'm willing to put down nearly a grand for that lens from those samples. I already have the 55-210, and the 35 f1.8, and I'm pretty satisfied with that set up. But I may add this one to my arsenal.

@JG7Racer 4 года назад

The Sony 18-135 has been FANTASTIC on my a6400. It's my primary right now and will continue to be unless my socks get blown off by something else.

@empotta4624 3 года назад

Have you compared this lens with the Sony 70-200 f4? I am trying to decide between that lens and this one. Thank you!

@Mieszyslaw 3 года назад

Hello. Will the e70-350 lens also be good for the sony a6000? I mean the quality of photos and videos.

@Blueridge1961 3 года назад

Yes!!!

@Mieszyslaw 3 года назад

@@Blueridge1961 Thank you and best regards

@jankucera8505 7 месяцев назад

I bought Tamron 150-500 and now I wish I bought this instead for APS-C because of how incredibly heavy the Tamron is. This is even 1/2 cheaper.

@tootoochannel249 2 месяца назад

How do you think about this lens compare to the newer - Tamron 18-300mm f3.5-6.3 in term of image quality and auto focus.

@clarification007 4 года назад

Thanks! Well done. But it missing the shots of a person (Your charming wife) from 70mm then 200.. then 350mm in photo (not video) to get an idea of the distance.

@teubma 4 года назад

First lens I bought without checking your video and I confirm everything you said. It is impressively performant

@mohammedmudassir36 3 года назад

Bro please compare it with sigma 100-400mm, waiting so desperately.. Love ur videos, ur channel made me switch from Nikon to Sony and Sigma and I can't give up Sigma lenses, they are super sharp.. Thanks for ur work, keep it up.. Stay safe

@miedreichchr 3 года назад

Thanks for your videos! Although my english is not that good, I almost understand everything you‘re saying. Thumbs up!

@rp1puccio789 3 года назад

You asked what lens i would use if i could only use 1. This is it in fact i use it all the time with my a6600. love it.

@heinreich3031 4 года назад

I initially had the sel70300. Disadvantages are the higher weight and the thickness of the lens. Since I prefer to use it at close range, I am always enthusiastic about the beautiful Bookeh. In addition, it offers slightly better light sensitivity over the entire range and the image scale is much better, you can approach the subject closer. For example, this is advantageous when shooting insects. Now I also own the 70-350, which is much lighter and is also more comfortable to use. I do not want to make a statement about the image quality yet, which is certainly excellent when viewed alone. Sharpness is not everything, but weight and handiness are very important properties. After all, I didn't switch from full frame to APS-C so that I could carry the same lenses afterwards!

@scottroberts3131 3 года назад

So where did you land on comparing your experience with these two lenses. I have full frame and crop bodies. I was thinking I'd stick with crop for longer range or apsc mode for the extra reach. I held both lenses...big difference in size. Do you miss the extra light and lower iso of the fe lens?

@heinreich3031 3 года назад

@@scottroberts3131 No, I do not muss anything. But I bought at the same time the SEL1655 and this is the lens I normally use. I do not like to change lenses. So I carry especially when I go by bike three cameras. 6000, 6500 and (I love 6600) 6600. Beside the two lenses I use the SEL1018 and there ist no need, changing lenses. But when I walk, the weight......

@elliegrace6410 3 года назад

Ugh. Stop making me regret buying a full frame 😂

@accompli Месяц назад

Good Review. You have a lovely son and wife, who also doubles as your constant model😊. Thank You for the review.

@Princeton_James 4 года назад

Sony 70-200 2.8 is almost 3k. I could never justify that. I haven't seen many telephoto options from Sony. Almost 1k is still a little steep but much better than 3k. Maybe itll be my 3rd Christmas present to myself.

@黃凱-d8i Месяц назад

The camera is Sony A6600, which focuses on humanistic photography. Please recommend Sony 70-300 or 70-350 or Tamron 70-180 70-300 and other lenses for future use when upgrading to full frame cameras. Thank you

@Data_analyst. 4 года назад

This is an APS-C lens. It's telephoto side is extended 50mm (75mm in 35mm equivalent) than the full-size lens 300mm. But, the length of the pay-out will be shorter in the 350mm, it's also lighter weight.

@DanPandrea 4 года назад

Two things I want to try with this lens: moon and bird shots. With my a6300 it should do well.

@erickotoya7775 4 года назад

I have the full frame version (in my a6300) sony 70-300 G OSS. And it's great take moon's photos.

@cantkeepitin 4 года назад

There is so muuuchhh more. Was hiking in our forrests in late autumn, and found so many objects.

@GabrielGGabGattringer 4 года назад

I'll use it for planespotting. I'm also using the A6300. 👍

@alexgoriatchenkov Год назад

Just today got this lens. Trying a couple shots from window and man I like it...have to be closer familiar . Manual focus in my Sony ZV-E10 was real fun, with camera assistant and visible all sharp points... Thank you for nice samples too.

@geoffmetube 7 месяцев назад

Please compare this lens to the Tamron 18-300mm. A Tamron 18-300 vs 70-300 comparison would be awesome too. sure, we know the Sony will be better, but how much better? and does the specialization on the Tamron 70-300 bring anything to the equation that would make us give up the range of the 18-300?

@PhotosByMackan 4 года назад

Been checking this lens out a lot! Thanks for the awesome review as always and I´ve now made up my mind, I will get this lens :D

@g43654 4 года назад

Did you test the full frame lens on the APSC body? May be that's why it's not as sharp. You lose a lot of resolution using a full frame lens on a smaller sensor.

@Brettt 4 года назад

You shouldn't lose any resolution on APSC

@walkslow7509 4 года назад

I believe you only lose resolution if you use an APS-C lens on a full frame camera body, cause then you crop the sensor's exposure.

@maxm4852 4 года назад

Would you go with the 70/200 f4 or this lens? Im not sure :). Please ignore the price difference:)

@xxFusilado 4 года назад

the F4 for sure. That constant aperture is very handy.

@kingweddingmedia 4 года назад

I echo Ramo. I own the 70-200mm f4 and it's a fantastic lens. Very sharp even at f4, and extremely versatile. I've regularly used it on aps-c cameras and it's been superb. You will not regret getting the f4!

@Kim_Miller 4 года назад

I have the 7/200 f4 for my a6000 and wondered the same thing when I saw this vid and thought about the extra reach. Having the longer reach is attractive, but I have to really think about how I use the current lens to decide if I need to go longer. However, my son borrows the 70/200 for his a7R3 so it does double service which the 70/350 won't do. Here in Australia the price difference is minimal, $1600 for this one and $1680 for the 70/200.

@kingweddingmedia 4 года назад

Kim Miller I would also advise you to have a look at what aperture and iso you typically end up using at the moment and bear in mind that if you’re at f4 regularly then on this lens your iso will need to be more than double what it is for the same exposure.

@maxm4852 4 года назад

thanks a lot mates

@heastin92532 4 года назад

With a lens like this, I was wondering how you think it would fair using it on the a6400 in a concert event, or indoors? What would you do to get the best light? What would your settings be>

@tkermi 4 года назад

In those cases you need all the light you can get. So I like to use shutter priority mode and let the automatics change the ISO (the aperture would pretty much stay at max.) as needed. So it's very fast and easy to just change the shutter based on what's the slowest you can use for the situation at hand.

@heastin92532 4 года назад

t kermi thank you

@jamesrobertgrimes 4 года назад

I'm wanting a zoom lens for my a6300. I don't have much need to go over 200mm but this looks tempting. I have been thinking that I wanted the 70-200mm f4. Which lens would most of you reading this get?

@mapsreview1507 Месяц назад

How do you compare to Tamron 18-300. Which is a better buy and better images for photographers?

@TVe200 4 года назад

I am not sure if I need that range. I consider to buy the Tamron 70-180 when it gets out and use it on APS-C. Aperture f/2.8 is way better than f/6.3.

@brunofalcone9979 4 года назад

Please include the settings for all the pictures you show. It's very useful info. Thanks for your videos!

@AiurMedia 4 года назад

beautiful lens oooooh wish i had the money for all these toys

@asurecolonialcourt3271 4 года назад

And on this review alone, I just bought one, thank you for a very insightful & informative review

@sashinger5230 3 года назад

Hey Arthur, thanks for the review! How would you decide between this one and the 70-200mm F4 for an A6400? I mostly do nature/landscape but also like a nice bokeh for detail shots. For the record: I wouldn't mind the extra cost for the 70-200, so that is not an argument for the 70-350. Still having a hard time choosing.

@doer6002 2 года назад

What did you choose ?, 70-200 or this lens?

@sashinger5230 2 года назад

@@doer6002 Went with the 70-350!

@doer6002 2 года назад

@@sashinger5230 Thanks for the response. so what do you think now? are you satisfied? or suggest me anything else?

@sashinger5230 2 года назад

@@doer6002 I really like it. In the end it was the compactness and the bigger range that made the decision for me since I'm using it mostly in daylight situations. Excellent lens!

@doer6002 2 года назад

@@sashinger5230 Thank you so much

@trancemoon8052 10 месяцев назад

Would anyone know why it is that when I turn the manual focus ring the object gets a lot bigger . Like I was taking a picture of the moon and when I turn the ring to focus the moon it doubles in size. I am a noob

@7784000 2 года назад

I really like the photos, especially at 3:54 and 4:15. I think I will get this lens soon. But first I'll get the Sigma 18-50 or maybe the sigma 16 mm 1.4. thx for your videos, they helped me a lot.

@7784000 Год назад

Got it meanwhile and its my absolute favourite lens at the moment. The stabilizer works so well on my a6400 body without IBIS. (Note that at higher focal lenghts, its almost just the OSS that does the job 👍) You can shoot a 1/80 s handheld so your ISO is reasonably low at daytime. For indoors I would definetly pick a f/2.8 zoom. But overall the range of 350mm (525 mm FF eq.) on apsc is crazy and the sharpness is also really nice. The long focal lenght even allows nice bookhes for portraits although it is a f/6.3

@danielDaniel-fw2rb 10 месяцев назад

I would like to buy this lens but I would really like to know if it is possible to take photos on speedways with cars going very fast, taking many photos at the same time?

@N0rdman 4 года назад

And now; the perfect gimbal for it: facebook.com/723832497814611/posts/1170172013180655/

@Princeton_James 4 года назад

F it. I bought it. Anyway, I have my Canon 70-200 2.8 is ii for sale.

@basvergeldt8717 3 года назад

I like this lens, leightweight and very sharp , colors are also very good, thanks for your review Arthur!

@yoankolev91 4 года назад

Do a review on the 70-200 full frame Sony lens. The one that is f4 is an amazing lens and is very sharp. Maybe also a comparison between 70-350 as well. With the full frame you are getting 105-300 on APSC. Great videos! With the full frame lens you are also future proofing in case you switch to a7 lineup.

@orlangurs 4 года назад

Sony 70-200 F4 is good, even on the APS-C camera. The only problem I had with it - when I lended one - the small drop from the height of half a meter on the carpet made it break in two parts. It has some squishy plastic details inside. I had to pay around 400$ for a repair and made a decision never buy the lens - that expensive and with that poor build quality - for myself.

@yoankolev91 4 года назад

Tumanov Alexey I do bought it as for my sony a6300. I did not stumble on this problem on the many reviews i watched for it but will be extremely careful with it from now on. Thanks!

@vkamlove 4 года назад

+1 for this comparison. I am looking out on that lens and would love the compare

@caldera878 4 года назад

Any modern lens let alone a complex zoom lens will get internal damage as in decentered elements, mechanical issues, focusing problems and of course external damaged when dropped. Unlike old metal vintage lenses which are built better than anything today will brush off fine.