Тёмный

The Source of Consciousness - with Mark Solms 

The Royal Institution
Подписаться 1,6 млн
Просмотров 561 тыс.
50% 1

Mark Solms discusses his new theory of consciousness that returns emotions to the centre of mental life.
Mark's book "The Hidden Spring" is available now: geni.us/CWaA
Watch the Q&A: • Q&A: The Source of Con...
Understanding why we feel a subjective sense of self and how it arises in the brain seems like an impossible task. Mark explores the subjective experiences of hundreds of neurological patients, many of whom he treated. Their uncanny conversations help to expose the brain’s obscure reaches.
Mark Solms has spent his entire career investigating the mysteries of consciousness. Best known for identifying the brain mechanisms of dreaming and for bringing psychoanalytic insights into modern neuroscience, he is director of neuropsychology in the Neuroscience Institute of the University of Cape Town, honorary lecturer in neurosurgery at the Royal London Hospital School of Medicine, and an honorary fellow of the American College of Psychiatrists.
Subscribe for regular science videos: bit.ly/RiSubscRibe
This talk was livestreamed by the Ri on 28 January 2021.
---
A very special thank you to our Patreon supporters who help make these videos happen, especially:
Elisa, Metzger, Kevin Winoto, Jonathan Killin, János Fekete, Mehdi Razavi, Mark Barden, Taylor Hornby, Rasiel Suarez, Stephan Giersche, William 'Billy' Robillard, Scott Edwardsen, Jeffrey Schweitzer, Gou Ranon, Christina Baum, Frances Dunne, jonas.app, Tim Karr, Adam Leos, Michelle J. Zamarron, Andrew Downing, Fairleigh McGill, Alan Latteri, David Crowner, Matt Townsend, Anonymous, Andrew McGhee, Roger Shaw, Robert Reinecke, Paul Brown, Lasse T. Stendan, David Schick, Joe Godenzi, Dave Ostler, Osian Gwyn Williams, David Lindo, Roger Baker, Greg Nagel, and Rebecca Pan.
---
Subscribe for regular science videos: bit.ly/RiSubscRibe
The Ri is on Patreon: / theroyalinstitution
and Twitter: / ri_science
and Facebook: / royalinstitution
and Tumblr: / ri-science
Our editorial policy: www.rigb.org/ho...
Subscribe for the latest science videos: bit.ly/RiNewsle...
Product links on this page may be affiliate links which means it won't cost you any extra but we may earn a small commission if you decide to purchase through the link.

Опубликовано:

 

28 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 1,6 тыс.   
@krish2nasa
@krish2nasa 2 года назад
51:41 "If we understand the function of the feeling, then we understand the function of the consciousness" Fascinating talk, Thank you very much.
@TheFinav
@TheFinav 2 года назад
This is one of the most brilliant and informative lectures that I have had the pleasure to witness. The speaker is an exceptionally gifted communicator. Thank you!!!
@zuralok
@zuralok 3 года назад
Thanks a lot for this interesting lecture Mark Solms, and thanks also to the Royal Institution for making this possible.
@QZainyQ
@QZainyQ 3 года назад
This is beautiful, I can't thank you enough for being the vessel through which this knowledge got to me.
@AnneAndersonFoxiepaws
@AnneAndersonFoxiepaws 3 года назад
When you were speaking about how a physiological event changed your brother, I was reminded on how frightening losing the ability to speak is. I know its nothing like what your brother, and family went through, but, during a migraine I was awakened to the realisation that you are very much separate from everything else. When you lose the ability to take words which you know full well, inside your head, and the migraine or bleed or whatever, changes your ability to communicate, it wakes you up to the fact that we are, very much, insular beings who can become trapped inside our own heads. Luckily its a transient phenomena for myself but nowadays I have a very real fear of anything like this happening again. I also disagree that behind the injury we are not ourselves, how do you know? I felt very much like myself but to the world I appeared very different...its nightmarish!
@skepticmoderate5790
@skepticmoderate5790 3 года назад
That sounds terrifying. I imagined it in my head and it sounds horrible. I hope I dream about it one day.
@wellynrose823
@wellynrose823 3 года назад
That's horrifying. The closest experience I have of being trapped inside myself would have to be when under sleep paralysis.
@AmitKumar-qz2us
@AmitKumar-qz2us 3 года назад
Vedanta is the very science of consciousness at both human and cosmic levels. It recognises consciousness as the ultimate reality and affirms its presence in all existence. All this- whatever exists in this changing universe, is pervaded by consciousness" --Isa Upanishad .5000-BCE The ancient Vedic rishis in all their wisdom said as early as 8000 BC , that our universe is not woven from matter but consciousness . (They never patent there knowledge there own name ) There are connections between quantum mechanics & consciousness . Consciousness is the intelligence, the organising principle behind the arising of form. The quantum field or pure consciousness is influenced by intention and desire. All atoms in the entire universe are capable of mind reading and communicating with other atoms. There is a consciousness in every molecule of matter. As per quantum physics things do not exist in its physical form, unless they are observed by a conscious observer. In every experiment when an observer expected energy to behave as a particle, it did so. When he thought it would probably be wave-like, it was. And when observers believed it might start out as one form and end up as another, it did so. This means ,nothing actually exists in its physical form until observed by someone, was adopted by the group as one of the concepts. You created them by your expectations and your thoughts of what should be. In every situation in your life, including the wealth or lack of it you choose to attract to you. Biology is a quantum process. All the processes in the body including cell communications are triggered by quantum fluctuations, and all higher brain functions and consciousness also appear at the quantum level. On the subatomic level-mind is over matter. The brain and DNA is governed by the laws of quantum physics rather than the laws of biology or neuro physiology. THE COSMOS IS THE PLAYGROUND OF MAYA.. FROM MICROCOSM TO MACROCOSM.. Bhagavad Gita is all about BEING IN THE MOMENT. You cannot change your past, you cannot survive without water, you cannot change natures principle. The only solution is to accept things as they are. Life is a combination or physical, intellectual and spiritual aspects. Without spiritual development , man is without love or positive emotions ( affection, care, respect, sympathy ) . Karma is the result of your actions. If you do something good, you will get good tings in return and if you do bad things, you will get likewise in return. Karma or the actions that you do in the present life is passed on to the next life. But fate is not passed on to the next life. Dharma is when we are walking the path of our soul's purpose. When we are walking our path we are out of karma. We are no longer creating cause and effect. We are in flow with the universe, with our spirit. Our soul is line with the Divine. 'Manu-Smiriti'- 5000BC describes the code for leading a disciplined way of life. Patience, Pardon, Suppression of will, Stay away from Theft, Purity, Control of desires, Wisdom, Knowledge, Truth, Controlling Anger. These 10 qualities are considered as main characteristics of the Dharma. The whole of material creation is conscious. Our consciousness creates our reality. What our consciousness can conceive , it can also create. Human beings are conscious. They can see themselves in the mirror and see colours, while an animal cannot. To a Vedantic every part of this universe is dynamic, it is vibrating, it is listening and can respond according to ones KARMA, It can be by action and can be purely thought. The universe listens to our action as well as thought and gives in return what exactly we want either knowingly or unknowingly, weather it is bad or good. Science is trying to understand the universe ‘out there’ and Vedanta addressed the universe ‘inside you’” Schrödinger, in speaking of a universe in which particles are represented by wave functions, said, “The unity and continuity of Vedanta are reflected in the unity and continuity of wave mechanics. This is entirely consistent with the Vedanta concept of All in One.” The multiplicity is only apparent. This is the doctrine of the Upanishads. And not of the Upanishads only. The mystical experience of the union with God regularly leads to this view, unless strong prejudices stand in the West. There is no kind of framework within which we can find consciousness in the plural; this is simply something we construct because of the temporal plurality of individuals, but it is a false construction… The only solution to this conflict insofar as any is available to us at all lies in the ancient wisdom of the Upanishad. - Erwin Schrödinger " You do not have a soul , you are a soul and you have a body "
@facttruth7571
@facttruth7571 3 года назад
@@AmitKumar-qz2us STOP SPAMMING NONSENSE! THIS IS NOT ABOUT RELIGION WHICH ALREADY OUTDATED HUNDRED YEARS AGO. GO BACK TO STONE AGE
@frinferneepers3977
@frinferneepers3977 3 года назад
@@facttruth7571 i feel like if you watch Dr. Solms and come away less convinced rather than more in the primacy and importance of subjective interpretation of the world/the things within it then you've very much missed the point
@matttenderholt4744
@matttenderholt4744 Год назад
‘The dogs are the chicken’ Brilliantly laughable! lol I have a seizure condition and have been very interested in brain activity since, as I often noticed deja vu and floating feelings in body, many occasions of which were precursors to having a seizure. I also an quite interested in dream activists well since I have felt a dreamlike stage during my absence of reality. It has been a pleasure to struggle to learn as much as I can understand about my condition and my curiosity to cross these uploads on RU-vid. Much respect to the Royal Institute for sharing, and even more so given to Mr. Mark Solms. Thank you infinitely! Peace and love 💕
@justinyang5989
@justinyang5989 3 года назад
Incredible talk on consciousness! Thank you Dr. Solms!
@vhawk1951kl
@vhawk1951kl 2 года назад
without defining consciousness?-That is no more than mouthing empty words
@theresechristiansen9769
@theresechristiansen9769 2 года назад
@@vhawk1951kl Oh, I misinterpreted you above. You are suggesting that the information and the evidence, provided by Dr Solm is somehow devoid of .....what? Consciouness? He DEFINED consciousness at the beginning, middle and end of his talk, did he not? Are you mouthing empty words without understanding the basis of his presentation. It seems to me that certain people from an echo chamber find themselves on science sites wanting to argue about consciousness when really they want to fight over "gee, this world is one without any kind of spirituality" when this is plain nonsense & a straw man argument at the very least. Of course I could be entirely wrong about this. If I am, then I apologise. But it was your manner. Your specific response.
@larmaytv36
@larmaytv36 2 года назад
@@vhawk1951kl No such thing as a correct definition of consciousness if you're not willing to consider all important ideas. If you dislike this video because you haven't learned anything from it then that's your problem.
@vhawk1951kl
@vhawk1951kl 2 года назад
@@larmaytv36 Does that not depend entirely on your criteria for "correct"? - "correct" according to who? If you are the arbiter of "correct" correct" in what sense do you use the word*correct*- the mathematical sense? "There is no*correct*definition of consciousness" - you say: ecce the hazards of universals, which the uncharitable might characterise as simply sloppy thinking. Clearly your famous and - for you, indefinable "consciousness" is to be found in a very forest of universals and sloppy thinking- To say nothing of pouring from the empty into the void. There is absolutely no difficulty whatsoever with defining "consciousness" for anyone with any wits and learning. Whoever made that sweeping generalisation and other forms of universal, clearly lacks both. If whoever makes an assertion cannot define what he means by "consciousness" or at least set out clearly what he seeks means or intends to convey by a particular word had best not use it at all- On any view it is no more than drivel
@QZainyQ
@QZainyQ 3 года назад
This is the best value of time I have ever spent watching something.
@houdini178
@houdini178 3 года назад
28:28 I've been watching science-related videos for over 10 years on this platform, but never had I been referred to as a scientist by a scientist on RU-vid's spacetime continuum. Thank you for such an experience.
@vhawk1951kl
@vhawk1951kl 2 года назад
Really *Whose* " science of *What*? Owing to the loss of the capacity to ponder and reflect, whenever the contemporary average man hears or employs in conversation any word(perhaps " science, or " consciousness") with which he is familiar only by its consonance, he does not pause to think, nor does there even arise in him any question as to what exactly is meant by this word, he having already decided, once and for all, both that he knows it and that others know it too. Do you see that you simply*assume* that you know what you mean by either "science" , or " consciousness" and it never even crosses you mind to seek to discover exactly what passes in you associations or associative apparatus or mind, or thoughts(so- called). Is that not*Exactly* correct? Not only is it and must it be correct, for the very simply reason that you*cannot*. How exactly would you go about doing that and is it not the exact equivalent of a mirror seeking to reflect itself, or you stand on your own shoulders? Can you understand that?
@suddenseer9013
@suddenseer9013 3 года назад
I use 3D Markovian decision geometry for expressing other things in our species common social issues. These mathematical structures seem to be everywhere. My brain literally had the feeling of popping with ecstacy when this lecture turned on some lights. Thanks, I needed that.
@nickacelvn
@nickacelvn 3 года назад
Good to have you on board.
@tomekd789
@tomekd789 2 года назад
Where can I read more about it?
@Terpsichore1
@Terpsichore1 3 года назад
I’m already reading it, and it’s making ‘sense’ to me and ‘affecting’ me greatly. Wonderful book. Thank you Mark!
@michaelseale7268
@michaelseale7268 3 года назад
Sorry, but the quality of experiences are not brain-based (including the brain stem) for the simple reason that consciousness did not emerge from brain matter. Consciousness is the ontological primary.
@winstonian3
@winstonian3 3 года назад
@@michaelseale7268 and how do you know that?
@JohnSmith-ys3wc
@JohnSmith-ys3wc 3 года назад
@A. George He took psychedelics and the clockwork elves from base reality told him.
@falklumo
@falklumo 3 года назад
@@michaelseale7268 After stimulation of your brain stem, you say otherwise ;)
@Miketar2424
@Miketar2424 3 года назад
@@michaelseale7268 Modern science needs to point to a mechanical cause of a sense of Being or consciousness. They discount research in psychedelics , even though many prominent researchers have used them, because their careers are based in 'hard' physical reductionist thought. Finding truth in the Universe is up to the individual, not academia.
@blueckaym
@blueckaym 2 года назад
That's really interesting! Especially to me, as it turns out my brainstem was pushed slowly but steadily for at least 15 or 20 years (I'm 43 now) by a giant (by the official classification at 51x43x33mm) vestibular schwannoma. That's a benign (is most cases) slow growing tumor growing out of the Schwann cells, in my case of the vestibular-acoustic nerve. Schwann cells are like the insulation around the nerve very much like the insulation on cables. The thing is the tumor as it has grown so big, has gradually pushed my brainstem way to the left side (it has started on the right side nerve). The brainstem, which normally should be going straight down in the middle from the base of the brain to spinal cord in my case has been pushed way left, so that's making about a 90 degrees turn to go around the tumor, almost from the top end of the brainstem, to the bottom of the cerebellum, where the brainstem returns to its normal position. That's actually the main reason to believe it has been growing very slowly, as it has managed to make such deformation without noticeable effects. Actually one of the few effects I got from it (which I didn't know at the time) were only about 3 months before I went to get a scan and found about the tumor, and it was for about a week in the summer in which I got overwhelming urge to yawn or swallow without a reason. And about a week later it was gone, I was back to some kind of normal (which apparently hasn't been normal for me for many years already). In any case that brainstem reticular formation that Mark Solms mentions as the source of our Consciousness, in my case was extremely deformed. Most likely not directly damaged, but at least pressed and pushed to the side. Also I assume there has been some manipulation in the region during the surgery I got to remove the tumor. Apparently the surgery was good (even if quite long - 14 hours) as I don't experience any noticeable physical effects from all this. There are other things like a moderate hydrocephalus, which was initially caused by the tumor completely compressing flat the 4th ventricle, and thus disturbing the normal reabsorption cycle of the cerebrospinal fluid. And also the scan that found the tumor, showed that I has a cyst of water on the outer right-side surface of the right-hemisphere, which doctors are saying is probably condition which I had from a baby. As result it pushed against my right hemisphere, and it got slightly underdeveloped as size at least. It's difficult to measure deficits in the functions of the right-brain hemisphere I guess. Sorry for the long description, but to summarize I wonder if that extreme deformation of my brainstem has affected my consciousness somehow?
@AALavdas
@AALavdas 2 года назад
I would not imagine so. The brainstem is so crucial for life itself, that if it was somehow damaged, the clinical manifestations would be obvious.
@She_Nanigans
@She_Nanigans Год назад
With so few side effects, however did they find the problem?
@blueckaym
@blueckaym Год назад
@@She_Nanigans I guess that's why the tumor grew for many years before it started to manifest as side-effects (initially with balance and hearing degradation in affected ear)
@She_Nanigans
@She_Nanigans Год назад
@@blueckaym oh, I see. I hope you have good health going forward.
@claires9100
@claires9100 Год назад
For someone with such a strange condition , your text proves that consciousness, intellect and language have not been at all hindered. Best of Health to you going forward!
@DamianReloaded
@DamianReloaded 3 года назад
Very interesting talk. The parts about reactions without cortex make me think more of "awareness" than "feeling". Maybe consciousness has levels of awareness. Awareness of the senses, then awareness of desires and then awareness of thoughts. Dreams for example, have no awareness of the senses, but have awareness of desires and we can experience feelings (fear, infatuation, arousal). Dreams usually lack will power. We don't usually decide what we do when we dream but we wouldn't say our dreamed persona lacks consciousness inside the dream as it acts and reacts within the dream very much like a conscious person. Same with the people we dream of. They are entirely made up, but for us, they look pretty humanly complete in the context of the dream.
@joszsz
@joszsz 3 года назад
I have some willpower in my dreams though 🤔... Some times I just ride along, but some times I find myself making willful decisions... At other times, I find myself in a spectator position (it's like I can sense myself and position, but I'm independent of what that self does... it's like being in a VR game without me doing the movement)
@DamianReloaded
@DamianReloaded 3 года назад
@@joszsz Yeah dreams can be lucid sometimes. I sometimes listen my voice narrating what will happen next in the dream I'm having. I've the suspicion Marvin Minsky was onto something when he wrote (in Society of Mind) about brain functions being composed of many simpler subsystems that can be turned on and off. What is also very impressive is how much we can still do with most of our brain gone. It'd seem like staying alive, sensing and reacting to the world can be done just with our "reptilian" part of the brain (I think it's the basal ganglia)
@joszsz
@joszsz 3 года назад
@@DamianReloaded Yeah! I do the narration thing too, and it's at that point that I usually realise it's a dream and wake up. It's all so intriguing. I'm not familiar with Marvin though, so I'll have to check his work out
@theresechristiansen9769
@theresechristiansen9769 2 года назад
@@DamianReloaded I really liked your comments. I hadn't thought of dreams in an affective manner as the lecture discussed. We need a Part 2!
@margrietoregan828
@margrietoregan828 3 года назад
With increasing calls for a science (for an objective science) of consciousness, Solm moves the needle a long way towards the ‘settled’ point … bravo.
@stanlibuda96
@stanlibuda96 3 года назад
What a great lecture!! Thanks to Mark Solms and the RI.
@thebiomatrix
@thebiomatrix 2 года назад
We are not a machine and the mind goes ways beyond the brain. There is stacks of evidence on this. Thank you for sharing and I hope you will continue your research 'outside' of the body. I fill the issue with your brother, is a 'confusion' between the two brain hemispheres.
@MrGarkin
@MrGarkin 3 года назад
its 2021. good connection, compression, camera and streaming picture s more important than a good suit.
@nightdruid540
@nightdruid540 3 года назад
dump the suits. throw on a robe and angle the camera respectfully. the future is now
@metaxy2230
@metaxy2230 2 года назад
As a Schelerian, I completely agree that feelings are a pre-requisite for consciousness. And if I understand correctly, he's saying the function of feelings demonstrates that they must already be conscious because feelings direct actions and choices (toward what is pleasurable and away from what is painful). I think, though, it would be helpful for him to distinguish the two forms of "consciousness" he's speaking of - In other words, when he says feelings are a pre-requisite for "consciousness," I think he means the higher consciousness that is characterized by self-awareness and language. When he says "Feelings are always conscious," though, I think he means a lower form of consciousness that is pre-lingual. Some philosophers argue that this second type of consciousness is common to all organic life. For example, the roots of a tree will grow will often toward what is nurturing and away from what is harmful. Some philosophers argue that this is the same sort of "consciousness" that he's ascribing to feelings.
@dmitrid385
@dmitrid385 3 года назад
Remarkable! This is why fishes and frogs and even insects have a personality. A great reason to become vegetarian.
@rlwemm
@rlwemm 3 года назад
You make a good point. It is a little disturbing, actually.
@naturalisted1714
@naturalisted1714 3 года назад
You said something along the lines of "Why are we conscious and why doesn't all of this go on in the dark?" There cannot be a non-experience for something that collects information and thinks towards a projected future, which can help the organism prepare for winter, etc. That's an adaptation that helps the spieces survive. It has been fine tuned by natural selection, and we call this conscious experience.
@timgaul2256
@timgaul2256 3 года назад
I tend to view things in terms of evolution, perhaps too much, but useful here for these questions and observations: (1) consciousness is shared by many organisms, so one should expect that the source of consciousness rests in the structures of the brain that all conscious organisms share; (2) one should at least suspect, if not expect, that organisms that share structures of the brain would share the traits associated with them, suggesting that lower organisms experience feelings-including emotions-greater than many people acknowledge; (3) just as affection for offspring and mate provide an evolutionary advantage (defined as getting genes into the next generation), feelings provide an evolutionary advantage in keeping the organism alive longer, thus able to reproduce more.
@anitalinke6659
@anitalinke6659 2 года назад
Your thought is expressed so clearly that it is like a balm to read it. Thank you.
@chekote
@chekote 2 года назад
Such an excellent talk 👏🏻 This is the first time I’ve heard a well reasoned and explained justification for why consciousness is beneficial for survival, and therefore why it would have evolved at all.
@suzannebrown2505
@suzannebrown2505 3 года назад
I have learned, when I was in college in one of my classes that when the brain is “short changed” in a part, or parts of its anatomy either by surgery or by lack of the part in birth, another part, or parts, of the brain “steps up” to fulfill the job of the missing part as much as it can. Until such time as we understand more about how the brain works and where various functions occur and how and where the neurotransmitters go, we can learn where control initiates, but as far as inferring “backup parts” that can take over temporarily, or permanently in the event of failure or absence, we can never Fully Understand the workings of the neurons in the brain.
@hochathanfire0001
@hochathanfire0001 8 месяцев назад
A scientific touch to the deep relationship between feelings and consciousness. Well presented 😊💃‼️
@happinesstan
@happinesstan 3 года назад
I like this guy after only 3 mins. One sentence succeeds in explaining that which I've tried to for many years. We ARE our emotional response to our environment. The individual can be manipulated by manipulation of the environment in which they experience themselves.
@emmanuelpil
@emmanuelpil 3 года назад
Especially noticeable in these times.
@ArtVandelayLTEX
@ArtVandelayLTEX 3 года назад
This was fascinating, going to read this ASAP.
@r.davidyoung7242
@r.davidyoung7242 3 года назад
This was absolutely brilliant. It makes a lot of sense. Raw emotions in the brainstorm. I'll be thinking about this for a long time. I cannot help but now think of the "factor 5" model of personality. This would seem to tie in very nicely.
@stirlingblackwood
@stirlingblackwood 3 года назад
Even if the brain stem is the seat of consciousness, why do feelings need to actually be felt for organisms to act in response to negative stimuli? If feelings are caused by neural activity, why don't organisms simply act in response to this neural activity instead of going through the middleman of conscious perception? For instance, instead of lack of food -> neural activity corresponding with hunger -> feeling of hunger -> action to end hunger, why isn't the causal chain simply lack of food -> neural activity corresponding to hunger -> action to end hunger? If consciousness plays an important role in the survival of conscious organisms, then consciousness must NOT be epiphenomenal, i.e. it must exert a causal influence on organisms' physical behavior. In order to justify the position that consciousness exerts this sort of "top-down" influence, one must explain the mechanism(s) by which this occurs. Maybe Dr. Solms was getting to this at the end, but I would have liked to see him delve into this seemingly glaring hole in his theory.
@DylanKoch96
@DylanKoch96 3 года назад
Read the book, it elaborates on this in fairly extensive detail (i'd rather not do Solms the disservice of poorly explaining)
@scarziepewpew3897
@scarziepewpew3897 2 года назад
His book explains it.
@scarziepewpew3897
@scarziepewpew3897 2 года назад
IMO the causal chain is better because the second one without realization of hunger you won't realize you need food.
@5pecular
@5pecular 3 года назад
Consciousness is the sum of the connections. The whole is greater than the sum of the parts.
@ubemcgrebbiii1923
@ubemcgrebbiii1923 3 года назад
By this argument you run into the partial ship building problem, essentially contending you become a fundamentally different person separate from your former self anytime one of your neurons die.
@JonesP77
@JonesP77 3 года назад
I'm sick of the scientists who say something nonsensical like "consciousness is only an imagination and does not really exist", which is absolutely wrong and simply makes no sense! Consciousness is the only thing we can say 100% that it exists. Everything else, the world around us and all the scientific knowledge those scientists are so proud of, could theoretically be a simulation and not exist. So completely put on the Kof. This shows that there are successful scientists who understand the simplest things completely wrong and are easily led by their success on a wrong path. I cant understand how someone could deny that consciousness exists. It makes no sense at all! So good to hear such good lecture.
@nikolaosdimitriadis15
@nikolaosdimitriadis15 3 года назад
The problem with emotional feelings (feeling afraid), as opposed to physical homeostatic feelings (feeling hungry), is that the emotional ones are often the consequence and not the cause of decision making and behavior. Are you running because you are afraid or are you are afraid because you running? The latter is more possible as both the father of modern psychology, William James, remarked more than a century ago and neuroscience confirms today. This is even more so in survival and highly uncertain situations (escaping a fire). If evolution required from us to first consciously feel before we run from a fire, or a bear, we would all be dead by now! And this has significant implications for the ongoing discussions of free will. Nevertheless, a fascinating talk by a great scientist and thinker!
@caywen
@caywen 3 года назад
Here's a question I often wonder about: Suppose we had total control of the mind. Would we be able to synthesize completely new emotions and feelings, or would they all fall into existing categories? If we dashed to an alien planet, would the aliens experience the same feelings as we do? Is the space of feeling unbounded, or does everything fall into happy/sad/excited/pain/anger/etc. Is there a "froopy" feeling that we just cannot begin to understand but Xorax the Squid-like Alien feels every day?
@JaneDoe-zk4uk
@JaneDoe-zk4uk 3 года назад
Not sure. A dog can smell 400 times more than we can. We can do the maths and understand the engineering in the olfactory system but we don’t have a clue what that range of ability would be like as an experience. Same with the blind woman who understood the mechanics of sight but had absolutely no notion of the sight experience. Maybe, with the aliens, if we needed to take on those extra senses from a purely survival point of view, we could do it.
@Bhavik630
@Bhavik630 Год назад
Is mind just a sum total of collection of thoughts, emotions, feelings, instincts or is there something more to it? Are we conscious of ourselves and the world, because of the knowledge that we have collected from childhood or regardless of it? Is there anything else there inside, besides this collective identity we call mind?
@williamburts5495
@williamburts5495 3 года назад
The reason material will always remain just a perception is because there will always be an explanatory gap problem due to our subjective or inner reality not being able to be observed by us as if it were some material object that has physical properties, so it is inconceivable how such a reality can be observed by studying the brain. It is the subjective self that is aware of the function of the senses being outlets that allow us to perceive the objective world. Our senses being material can only give us experience of material phenomena that has attributes of form, taste, smell, sound, and physical texture, but since consciousness being awareness is devoid of physical attributes our awareness which is the subjective self will always be inaccessible for our senses to perceive. And since consciousness cannot observe consciousness there will always be an explanatory gap problem as well as the hard problem of consciousness that will always make consciousness and it's origins not observable by any material means. Since truth can be defined as " that which is realized to be true " materialism can never be a realized truth but rather a belief or perception.
@markmartens
@markmartens 2 года назад
"So that sentence: 'Neuropsychology is admirable, but it excludes the psyche' captured exactly my dismay and frustration with my field. Such was how things stood in the 1980's." Mark Solms
@chewyjello1
@chewyjello1 3 года назад
Great talk. Still doesn't solve the hard problem though. Why is it that atoms arranged in a certain way to make a brain stem...how/why in the world does that create "feelings"?
@Starkl3t
@Starkl3t 3 года назад
That's what his book is about...
@frankfeldman6657
@frankfeldman6657 3 года назад
I knew that going in. It will never be answered. Still, a worthwhile talk.
@d1p70
@d1p70 3 года назад
Q1. Because that was the one design that survived out of all the other possible brain cell versions that was not removed from the gene pool over the course of human history. Your question is essentially what Darwin answered in his infamous treatise. Q2. Stay tuned! One day just like we figured out how our digestive system converts nutrition to energy and waste, we will know the answer to that too...
@rlwemm
@rlwemm 3 года назад
There are other podcasts that answer this question. As d1p70 says, it is a function of a partly random neural network that happens to work better in its environment than any other one that was selected by that environment to continue its better adapted existence. In its simplest manifestation it provided feedback to the organism that eventually, over millions of years, evolved into "sensations" and "feelings". In its simplest form, it was just a chemical reaction. The gradual development of better detection-reaction systems, aka known now as "neural networks" enabled these increasingly complex sensations to become "consciousness". Let us not forget that there is a very wide spectrum of "consciousness" . It is important to understand that this phenomena, including self-awareness and self-identification, is not confined to the human species. This tends to be under-appreciated because humans are the only species, so far, that have developed a system of verbal communication that can express it in a way that can be passed on to future generations. Apes that have been taught sign language can express their feelings to others, including other apes that understand sign language. Species without language are restricted to sharing and expressing feelings by things like body contact.
@dkathrens77
@dkathrens77 3 года назад
I like the idea that the brain is in a predictive processing state, constantly trying to guess what will happen next and prepare for it. Emotions, aka "feelings" are, in our holographic memory, relate to situations and events in the past. Ex: walking past a bakery you smell fresh bread. Your mouth waters. You notice you feel hungry. You find yourself altering course to walk into that bakery as your body prepares to consume and digest some bread. "You" thought it was "YOUR" IDEA. "You" only got the memo after the event. Free will? "You" may decide to eat something else, but no part of "you" will decide to NOT EAT--why? Because "you" won't survive long enough to pass on "your" genetic material.
@AlexTube2006
@AlexTube2006 3 года назад
Thanks RI for having Professor Solms!
@mikeq5807
@mikeq5807 3 года назад
The necessary means to consciousness is introspection. One awakens through self-observation and observation of life. The flower blooms because of its root.
@dkathrens77
@dkathrens77 3 года назад
This appears to be a circular argument. Who or what was doing that initial introspection?
@mikeq5807
@mikeq5807 3 года назад
@@dkathrens77 You are making obscure what is obvious. Introspect. Know thyself.
@mikeq5807
@mikeq5807 3 года назад
@@dkathrens77 Hi Dennis. Some people may want to intellectualize. Wrong idea. Simply gain insight from your life experiences through introspection (meditation, looking inward, self-observation.) It's that simple.
@billyoumans1784
@billyoumans1784 3 года назад
But what is AWARE of the raw feelings?
@Mobay18
@Mobay18 3 года назад
Other people you are trying to survive with.
@rdizzy1
@rdizzy1 3 года назад
"Raw" feelings would just be chemical signals, nothing more.
@gordonpepper1400
@gordonpepper1400 2 года назад
I think Mark Solms provides, by far and away, the best understanding of consciousness. It all starts in the brain stem with the production of feelings/affect, and then later grows/develops into our notion of the 'I' from there. This makes so much sense to me. Human language (cortex), including written language, accentuated this notion of creating subjectivity (or the the 'I' ), but human language did NOT actually create it! like so many scholars would like us to believe. However, could someone answer for me where the role of creativity comes into play within this model? Why does creativity feel good to the 'I'? to me? How does that relate to the brain stem activity, the reticular activating system, and the this sense of feeling, which Mark emphasizes so often?
@prwchan
@prwchan 3 года назад
Beautiful. Thank you
@farhadfaisal9410
@farhadfaisal9410 3 года назад
A remarkable scientific synthesis of the location (brain stem, not cerebral cortex), function and adoptational advantage of the subjective experience of "feeling" -- the basal conscious experience!
@kagannasuhbeyoglu
@kagannasuhbeyoglu 3 года назад
Consciousness a great unknown... Thank you The Ri 👍
@ReasonableForseeability
@ReasonableForseeability 3 года назад
Or maybe consciousness is a great KNOWN and the material world ia the great unknown.
@kagannasuhbeyoglu
@kagannasuhbeyoglu 3 года назад
@@ReasonableForseeability This is the question of thousands of years. Who knows maybe you're right...
@mohamudosman7184
@mohamudosman7184 Год назад
Thank you for the excellent explanation of the pursuit of finding the answer to where "I" might be.
@peterhall4086
@peterhall4086 3 года назад
Fascinating, so fascinating I have bought the book, and am currently reading it. Thanks for your work.
@RobertSmith-pw1cl
@RobertSmith-pw1cl 11 месяцев назад
Wow, an explination that finally is understandable and makes sense.
@awareawake1065
@awareawake1065 3 года назад
Mark ... this was truly a revelation, you are truly onto something here. Some thoughts. In ancient Egypt the serpent on the head of the great statues represents the cerebral cortex. In the bible in the garden of Eden, the serpent is also a representation of the cerebral cortex, the thinking mind. It is the egoic mind that leads us astray. Thinking is our greatest asset, and our greatest obstacle to overcome to find the true I in all of us. The true I, the subject, is the same in all conscious beings, a cat or a dog or no different to a human, once the cerebral cortex is out of the way. This is the goal of meditation and enlightenment, to stop thinking in order to discover who you really are. In egypt the crook was symbolic of the need to catch the snake and hold it, control it, in order to become a true human. There is a place for thought, but as your journey has shown, thought is not who we truly are. You are not your thoughts, you are the observer of your thoughts. The buddha is always portrayed sitting on a coiled serpent, with the head extending over and behind him. This again is the cerebral cortex being symbolised. To become enlightened one must control the serpent, stop thinking, and see things as they really are.
@Gpenguin01
@Gpenguin01 8 месяцев назад
Very fascinating presentation. I can’t help but draw parallels with Buddhist understanding of consciousness and its arising from sensory perception and the concept of “self.”
@bellakrinkle9381
@bellakrinkle9381 6 месяцев назад
I don't know about the Buddhists. I found consciousness by becoming one with myself through understanding what was hidden in my unconscious. I realize that this statement will be met with disbelief, yet it's true. I lost God and looked within myself via psychoanalysis. It took 10 years. True story. 🎉
@JohnClulow
@JohnClulow 2 года назад
Incredible to see how this theory of consciousness could be outlined so well in the space of an hour!... including the ink to its evolutionary origins. It seems to me this has to be the right path for subsequent inquiry into this important question. I will read your book.
@philippedardenne5241
@philippedardenne5241 3 года назад
I found this lecture fascinating, but I can't help an other (naive) question : how can you be so sure that the stem region is the center of consciousness and not only the primal antena of consciousness? For instance how do you explain people relating very specific talk of third parties after a near death experience in which experience there were absolutely no brain activity?
@bandulaamarawardena6576
@bandulaamarawardena6576 3 года назад
Yes, indeed. Also how can you explain the supernatural powers some people have, for example, powers that Jesus demonstrated.
@LuisSantiago-ow8mu
@LuisSantiago-ow8mu 3 года назад
@@bandulaamarawardena6576 hahaha you are very funny.
@ekstarphoenix7617
@ekstarphoenix7617 Год назад
Consciousness is light and sound experiencing reflections
@ekstarphoenix7617
@ekstarphoenix7617 Год назад
It’s everywhere, not always correct
@maxnullifidian
@maxnullifidian 3 года назад
I'm wondering whether the brother knew he was different. Could he tell that he had changed?
@johnsykes9623
@johnsykes9623 3 года назад
Very good question, though in view of his very young age this may be dificult. Many older victims of brain trama do reailse they have changed and to another degree, even we may realise that we have no reason to be jelious, depressed or any of a number of our emotions but they are there.
@gazmasonik2411
@gazmasonik2411 3 года назад
Assumes memory is accessible by some process of awareness without memory or knowledge of self. Feedback loop between hemispheres seems to produce a field independent of physical structure. That would suggest brains are analogous to radio or TV receivers. Rupert sheldrakes morphic resonance suggests mind is a field similar to martial art practices of "feeling" another's gaze. Or experiments displaying dogs reacting to being stared at without any traditional sensory input.
@REDPUMPERNICKEL
@REDPUMPERNICKEL 3 года назад
@@gazmasonik2411 The only "field independent of physical structure" I can imagine is metaphoric.
@diestudentin6932
@diestudentin6932 3 года назад
I am totally thrilled because I find nearly everything touched on that is relevant to the study of consciousness! Thank you a thousand times for this video!!
@frankfeldman6657
@frankfeldman6657 3 года назад
Brilliant, but he still doesn't cross the uncrossable chasm - from whence does this "feeler of feelings" arise? He's pushed back the problem to its proper location, but hardly solved it. Thermostats don't have feelings, last time I checked.
@LuigiSimoncini
@LuigiSimoncini 3 года назад
Did you ask them? THEY DO! it's just that their feelings are infinitely simpler than yours
@MajidFouladpour
@MajidFouladpour 3 года назад
Well said. The chasm being uncrossable; this should not be unexpected (not that I'm saying *you* find it unexpected.) Still it is sad not to be able to understand the basis and nature of understanding ...
@ekstarphoenix7617
@ekstarphoenix7617 Год назад
Appreciation is key for a healthy consciousness
@homerbeer943
@homerbeer943 2 года назад
There is so much that physicalism can't properly explain no matter how hard scientists try. I wish I could tell RU-vid to stop suggesting this guy. I've heard him and found him wanting.
@WYLOEvelin
@WYLOEvelin 3 года назад
"Spacetime is doomed" - Nima Arkani-Hamed "Spacetime reality is just a data structure." - Donald Hoffman
@AmitKumar-qz2us
@AmitKumar-qz2us 3 года назад
Vedanta is the very science of consciousness at both human and cosmic levels. It recognises consciousness as the ultimate reality and affirms its presence in all existence. All this- whatever exists in this changing universe, is pervaded by consciousness" --Isa Upanishad .5000-BCE The ancient Vedic rishis in all their wisdom said as early as 8000 BC , that our universe is not woven from matter but consciousness . (They never patent there knowledge there own name ) There are connections between quantum mechanics & consciousness . Consciousness is the intelligence, the organising principle behind the arising of form. The quantum field or pure consciousness is influenced by intention and desire. All atoms in the entire universe are capable of mind reading and communicating with other atoms. There is a consciousness in every molecule of matter. As per quantum physics things do not exist in its physical form, unless they are observed by a conscious observer. In every experiment when an observer expected energy to behave as a particle, it did so. When he thought it would probably be wave-like, it was. And when observers believed it might start out as one form and end up as another, it did so. This means ,nothing actually exists in its physical form until observed by someone, was adopted by the group as one of the concepts. You created them by your expectations and your thoughts of what should be. In every situation in your life, including the wealth or lack of it you choose to attract to you. Biology is a quantum process. All the processes in the body including cell communications are triggered by quantum fluctuations, and all higher brain functions and consciousness also appear at the quantum level. On the subatomic level-mind is over matter. The brain and DNA is governed by the laws of quantum physics rather than the laws of biology or neuro physiology. THE COSMOS IS THE PLAYGROUND OF MAYA.. FROM MICROCOSM TO MACROCOSM.. Bhagavad Gita is all about BEING IN THE MOMENT. You cannot change your past, you cannot survive without water, you cannot change natures principle. The only solution is to accept things as they are. Life is a combination or physical, intellectual and spiritual aspects. Without spiritual development , man is without love or positive emotions ( affection, care, respect, sympathy ) . Karma is the result of your actions. If you do something good, you will get good tings in return and if you do bad things, you will get likewise in return. Karma or the actions that you do in the present life is passed on to the next life. But fate is not passed on to the next life. Dharma is when we are walking the path of our soul's purpose. When we are walking our path we are out of karma. We are no longer creating cause and effect. We are in flow with the universe, with our spirit. Our soul is line with the Divine. 'Manu-Smiriti'- 5000BC describes the code for leading a disciplined way of life. Patience, Pardon, Suppression of will, Stay away from Theft, Purity, Control of desires, Wisdom, Knowledge, Truth, Controlling Anger. These 10 qualities are considered as main characteristics of the Dharma. The whole of material creation is conscious. Our consciousness creates our reality. What our consciousness can conceive , it can also create. Human beings are conscious. They can see themselves in the mirror and see colours, while an animal cannot. To a Vedantic every part of this universe is dynamic, it is vibrating, it is listening and can respond according to ones KARMA, It can be by action and can be purely thought. The universe listens to our action as well as thought and gives in return what exactly we want either knowingly or unknowingly, weather it is bad or good. Science is trying to understand the universe ‘out there’ and Vedanta addressed the universe ‘inside you’” Schrödinger, in speaking of a universe in which particles are represented by wave functions, said, “The unity and continuity of Vedanta are reflected in the unity and continuity of wave mechanics. This is entirely consistent with the Vedanta concept of All in One.” The multiplicity is only apparent. This is the doctrine of the Upanishads. And not of the Upanishads only. The mystical experience of the union with God regularly leads to this view, unless strong prejudices stand in the West. There is no kind of framework within which we can find consciousness in the plural; this is simply something we construct because of the temporal plurality of individuals, but it is a false construction… The only solution to this conflict insofar as any is available to us at all lies in the ancient wisdom of the Upanishad. - Erwin Schrödinger " You do not have a soul , you are a soul and you have a body "
@NorseCode.81
@NorseCode.81 Год назад
I am six months into receiving from a brain hemorrhage after a head injury. Consciousness and personality are two different things.
@immaterialscientist3964
@immaterialscientist3964 2 года назад
This seems to make a lot of sense and aligns with the 3 evolutionary stages of the brain. As you've said, this very well be akin to the on off switch for the brain. Nevertheless, I dont feel the Hard Problem has been alleviated. Accepting this all as 100% fact still doesn't answer the question of how it is that unconscious matter gives rise to a rich inner subjective experience. Someone kindly let me know if I somehow missed that part.
@edwardlee2794
@edwardlee2794 3 года назад
thanks for the wonderful lecture. can one's feeling be communicated to another person of intimate relationship without audio or visual expression. it seems possible according to some experience. is there another dimension beyond audio and visual transmission. would quantum tunneling play a hidden role . thanks for the effort and keep up with the good work. from Hker worldwide
@marc.lepage
@marc.lepage 2 года назад
Thank you Mark, I will put your book on The List.
@hellovicki6779
@hellovicki6779 3 года назад
Very interesting, I have often pondered the question of consciousness, why we have it? What purpose it serves and what advantage it provides? This talk now leads me to think that consciousness allows us to be unique in our perceptions and processing which then permits for complex, sophisticated creativity...creativity being hugely useful in order to create art, music but also invent and adapt our environment, research and problem solve, ultimately what we refer to as intelligence??? Just my mind rant here, I love this stuff though it is so interesting.
@williamburts5495
@williamburts5495 3 года назад
You asked, what purpose it serves and what advantage it provides ? Consciousness is that which makes reality possible to be known, take away your awareness and what would you know?
@lashajakeli
@lashajakeli Год назад
Dr. Solms, I think the critical point in your argument is the case of the child with anencephaly because that is the first premise upon which you assume that if it is not the cerebrum then consciousness must reside in the brain stem in RAS. However, the problem with this assumption is that we don't really know whether the child is really conscious or not, because speaking of Nagel's terms, we don't know what it's like to be her from the inside. The behavior that she exhibits might well be a sign of her intact brain stem reflexes or acting unconsciously. As we know people who have damage to their occipital cortex (V1 region) and are consciously blind, are still able to register and process information with intact parts of their brain and are still able to choose the right color and shape more frequently than expected by chance. I think her behavior can be something similar. Thought I would share my opinion as a neurologist myself. I really enjoyed your lecture in other regards.
@kirstinstrand6292
@kirstinstrand6292 2 года назад
Perhaps our sleep dreams allow us to discover the explanations of the unconscious feelings, as long as the symbols in the dreams are properly interpreted. The human body must depend on homeostasis for proper functioning; all body organs rely on homeostasis, be it our mind, liver, heart, etc. A recurring dream is evidence that a message is in need of a proper explanation to correct an imbalance in the mind. Pain and suffering screams to us that all is not well, regardless of the organ(s) requiring attention. My experience is that for those seeking Consciousness, it can take a lifetime to resolve lack of mental homeostasis. Mark Solms makes good Sense to me; he gives evidence of our innate ability to resolve complicated issues.
@williamchamberlain2263
@williamchamberlain2263 2 года назад
One hypothesis for some dreams is the brain trying out what-if scenarios to extrapolate_ learning without having to experience the exact situation
@bill-zv3gh
@bill-zv3gh 3 года назад
Very interesting, novel (at least to me) and very well delivered. My own principal question is how is it that the flux of sodium ions across the axonal membrane (which is obviously free of emotion/feeling) causes consciousness. This I would assume is the hard problem of consciousness.
@dexterdextrow7248
@dexterdextrow7248 2 года назад
Well, it's not the mere transference of ion across a membrane that causes consciousness. Pretty certain it's the incredibly complex and malleable structure that's key. Much like how one electronic switch isn't a computer, but if you assemble a sufficient number of them properly, then you got yourself a calculator.
@Amerikanwoman333
@Amerikanwoman333 Год назад
Love the Royal Institute ❤❤❤❤
@danielballard3364
@danielballard3364 2 года назад
I have only now stumbled over this talk, but i really absolutely agree with other comments here about the function of feeling in the context of homeostasis being an absolutely brilliant idea! It even makes a lot of sense, the more you think about it really in depth.
@chastetree
@chastetree Год назад
Nick Lane's RI talk on the Kreb cycle comes to a similar conclusion in a more concise and more mechanistically insightful way.
@clintnorton4322
@clintnorton4322 2 года назад
It seems to me that the search for one location, one field, one consciousness, "Oneness", has been the limiting factor in the growth of understanding ourselves and the universe. This man has recognized emotional consciousness. It has been recognized before but they were unable to express it without the science we currently have. Previously the focus was on mental/cognitive consciousness, religions focused on spiritual consciousness. Perhaps the reticular activating system is the coordinator of the consciousness systems. And possibly the primary interface to the consciousness systems. I propose that we should extend the acceptance of diversity to the inner world too.
@bhuvaneshwarjoshi3683
@bhuvaneshwarjoshi3683 Год назад
Higher level of consciousness where ego 'I'is present is perhaps like a website that mind develops and gives it an identity I,that is me and its awareness as consciousness.Whatever our new experience( external or internal feeings) get added to this default website.
@albaur388
@albaur388 3 года назад
My highest awareness is that I’m not aware. Consciousness is an illusion that the ego needs.
@NothingMaster
@NothingMaster 3 года назад
Recognizing ourselves in the mirror, or even regurgitating lame phrases like ‘I think therefore I am’ constitute the lowest forms of consciousness. Grappling with metaphysical questions like: “ Why is there something, why is there anything at all, rather than nothing” bring a whole new dimension to what we think we’re conscious of. P.S. I was rather disappointed that you didn’t make an attempt to connect your ideas with the quantum theory/physics of consciousness, as for instance presented in the pioneering works of such eminent scientists as Roger Penrose and Stuart Hameroff. We live in a quantum world and so is ultimately the origins of our consciousness. Without a quantum theory for the basis of consciousness our understandings of its nature and origins remain incomplete.
@wayneshenry
@wayneshenry 3 года назад
This makes perfect sense. Even lesser life forms have a self preservation instinct and “who” are they preserving? SELF must exist in the baser forms of our brain (our monkey brain) and our further developed cortex is our icing on the base cake. It allows us to further “understand" what we are preserving and how better to do that.
@beatriznunescunha
@beatriznunescunha 2 года назад
I feel therefore I am conscious
@classica1fungus
@classica1fungus Год назад
This is brilliant! Just purchased the audiobook version! Let's gooooo
@Martinko_Pcik
@Martinko_Pcik 3 года назад
Very informative and clearly presented. I have learned something new. Your reasoning makes sense. What a contrast to another talk about the same topic with Anil Seth.
@johannlundin-knutsen9298
@johannlundin-knutsen9298 2 года назад
Fantastic lecture. I enjoyed every second of it. Please do more of these😳🙏🏻
@goran72
@goran72 2 года назад
There is nothing that makes us aware, it is ourselves.
@michaelholding5469
@michaelholding5469 3 года назад
All that sounds quite reasonable, but rhe question that no ones seems to want to ask is :- what is this thing that is experiencing the feelings? - The self that Descartes recognised in his famous proclamation "I think, therefore I am"
@jagathmithya719
@jagathmithya719 3 года назад
How about "I am, therefore, I think"?
@roe2012
@roe2012 Год назад
36:25 this is, extraordinary. This information really valuable.
@stcriss6458
@stcriss6458 2 года назад
Amazing how the mystery of the Reality&Unives are revealed by human MIND a continuous conscious process of information exchange through senses ( touch, sight, hearing, smell and taste) between inside body / outside medium and the central nervous system "THE BRAIN" ❤ 🧠
@buffshepherd1540
@buffshepherd1540 2 года назад
I'm curious of the quality and level of consciousness of other animals. We assume self-awareness to be a uniquely human phenomenon, but we are constrained by our ability to only articulate with other humans, not animals. When I observe and interact with my Labrador, it is clear he is having a subjective experience, he is experiencing a range of emotions and he is making 'free' decisions. I am confident my dog is conscious, but unfortunately I can't ask him. Though we can gaze into each others eyes and see the lights on. It appears that language plays are large role in our consciousness and really does separate us from the shared experience we can have with other animals. EDIT: Shortly after writing this message, Mark addressed the idea (41:45) that we can sense our dogs are conscious and respond emotionally, but due to our ability to communicate with language, we can't know for sure.
@08wolfeyes
@08wolfeyes 3 года назад
An extremely good talk and Dr Mark Solms makes for some very appealing evidence. The one question i have is, can it be possible for someone to feel nothing yet still be conscious?
@spud8137
@spud8137 2 года назад
psychopathy is partially like this , they lack empathy.
@ekstarphoenix7617
@ekstarphoenix7617 Год назад
There is nothing impenetrable, everything shares with time and cosmos, your understanding is the impenetrable.
@ekstarphoenix7617
@ekstarphoenix7617 Год назад
We are feeling tubes of love flushing and transforming energy, language and reality, get opened with love nerdy bug.
@astridheliroemer7314
@astridheliroemer7314 2 года назад
THE BEST EVER. THANK YOU SO MUCH..
@pocketmoon
@pocketmoon 3 года назад
Consciousness is 100% hindsight.
@michaelepstein2570
@michaelepstein2570 3 года назад
There is consciousness and then there is Consciousness.
@michaelepstein2570
@michaelepstein2570 3 года назад
consciousness is the movement of the I, the me, the self, the observer, the experiencer, the interpreter, the controller, the chooser, the censor, the meditator, which is an illusion invented from the past conditioning of the brain. consciousness has many levels. Consciousness has no levels. consciousness is a chemical mechanical process of the brain. Consciousness IS NOT a chemical mechanical process of the brain. consciousness is a bundle of memory. Consciousness IS NOT a bundle of memory. consciousness originates in the brain. Consciousness DOES NOT originate in the brain. consciousness invents reality. Consciousness is the movement of Truth. Total Freedom from consciousness is the beginning of Consciousness. Consciousness is the movement of Inner Silent Space. When there is Consciousness, there is Perceiving without the lens of memories. It is Perceiving without the perceiver. This Consciousness is what we call Heart, Soul, Spirit. Then and only then is there Love, Peace, Joy, Goodness, Kindness, Compassion (Passion for All), Beauty, Creativity, Feeling, ExperiencING, Lucidity, Truth, and Wisdom. Then and only then is there Communication, Communion, Connection, Relationship with everyone and everything, for the very first time, in each and every moment of daily life.
@michaelepstein2570
@michaelepstein2570 3 года назад
Step 1: Be a Human Being. There are human beings and then there are Human Beings. A human being is one who is being driven by the I, the me, the self, the so-called True or Higher Self, which is an illusion invented by the past conditioning of the brain. It acts like a filter, which limits, distorts, shapes, and colors all perceptions. It acts like an inner tyrant who tells you what to think, how to feel and what to do. Moreover, it invents the illusion of division and separation from everyone and everything, which leads inevitably to conflict, violence, and suffering. Therefore, they never See, Hear, or Feel anyone or anything. As a result, there is no Love, Peace, Joy, or Creativity. There is only their limitation and imitation. A human being is actually inhuman. Total Freedom from the I, the me, the self, the so-called True or Higher Self, is the beginning of being a Human Being in daily life. A Human Being is one who is actually Totally Free of fear, anxiety, depression, guilt, confusion, loneliness, addiction, envy, greed, jealousy, bias, and prejudice. A Human Being is one who actually treats everyone, without exception, with the same intensity and quality of care and affection that they would give their dearest closest friend, lover, or child, without any sense of division or separation. A Human Being is actually Living Love, Peace, Joy, Truth, Creativity, Compassion (Passion for All) in each and every moment of daily life. A Human Being is actually Communicating, Communing, Connecting with everyone and everything in each and every moment of daily life.
@michaelepstein2570
@michaelepstein2570 3 года назад
Google "Total Enlightenment NOW!".
@scottkraft1062
@scottkraft1062 3 года назад
The ego protects us from becoming fully conscious .
@AlvinLee007
@AlvinLee007 3 года назад
Okay, I need his book.
@mohammedjavedabdullah1893
@mohammedjavedabdullah1893 Год назад
THANK YOU VERY MUCH SIR..
@dkoehler47
@dkoehler47 3 года назад
"I regard consciousness as fundamental. I regard matter as derivative from consciousness. We cannot get behind consciousness". Max Planck said this in 1931. To me, this means that consciousness is not generated by the brain, the brain is a product of consciousness as is all material existence.
@dakrontu
@dakrontu 3 года назад
I am not aware of my consciousness creating the world around me. I did not create the country I live in or the planet it is on or the sun it orbits. The world around me seems to operate according to discernible consistent rules. It seems to be shared by other people's consciousnesses too, ie we find ourselves wandering around in the same world.
@davecros4887
@davecros4887 Год назад
Interesting exploration. Fascinating actually.
@mikegLXIVMM
@mikegLXIVMM 3 года назад
I've never heard a good explanation of consciousness or emotion. I like the color blue over yellow. How does that work?
@tedgrant2
@tedgrant2 3 года назад
What makes me conscious ? Short answer:- My brain, when it has a normal blood supply and is not asleep and is not damaged etc. (I am ignoring the idea that I might be possessed by an unclean spirit).
@mofwoofoo1
@mofwoofoo1 10 месяцев назад
Thanks for the fascinating talk! One question: You have pointed out the importance of homeostasis in regards to our survival. Tell me if I am incorrect when I say, that the homeostasis of the body is essentially carried out be the trillions of different microbes that live synergistically in the body, second by second throughout our lives.. All we can do as far as supplying the body with nutrients is to be conscious of what we ingest. First of all, do you agree and more to the point is does anyone have any idea how these trillions of different microbes manage to do this?
@zukes6517
@zukes6517 3 года назад
The information given in this talk is an incredible starting point for so many fields of science. The first to come to mind is better Artificial Intelligence development. Another, might be more accurate biological simulations. Life is essentially a chemical reactions that (through repeated experiment) becomes more complex in order to sustain itself. I imagine we can gain profound insight by combining this knowledge with the information presented in this talk. The possibilities are quite profound.
@acidtears
@acidtears 3 года назад
Interdisciplinary research is indeed the future
@REDPUMPERNICKEL
@REDPUMPERNICKEL 3 года назад
Isn't it interesting that all these comments are couched in language and interesting that so many of our thoughts are words 'spoken' silently to our 'self' and interesting that both words and thoughts are metaphoric in nature insofar as they are not the things they are about but are references to them. Are the discharge frequencies of neurons the means by which metaphors are encoded? I'll bet they are.
@ekstarphoenix7617
@ekstarphoenix7617 Год назад
Consciousness starts by sensitivity, then it goes to the fisionomy and translates into what one perceives, everything needy giving and interconnected
@carlorossi1261
@carlorossi1261 3 года назад
I came online in life at age 3 one day when i realized i shat my pants
@5piles
@5piles 3 года назад
false, ppl without exception can perceive much earlier awareness of their life once they develop stronger concentration. you are merely pathetic right now and so you possess pathetic capacity to investigate and remember your own awareness.
@RichardGoldwaterMD
@RichardGoldwaterMD Год назад
In your book, you describe feelings as the best way to think about cs. Because there are no unconscious feelings. I’d suggest that there are two kinds of feelings. Sensation is the feeling of data. Hot. Cold. Blue. Threat. Anything in motion. Affect is the feeling of emotion, and emotion is a response to meaning. What something means emotionally is how it feels to you, as something other than yourself that acts upon you. Beauty. Love. Ideals.
@devonstafford6865
@devonstafford6865 3 года назад
Mark, you need your own channel.
@ranand089
@ranand089 3 года назад
Prof you gotta sit in meditation in one of the Himalayan caves..Haha. This question of "I" or "aatm" is atleast 3000 yrs old and the foundation of the Hindu vedic philosophies. So good to see science is taking interest in it..thank you 🙏
@frankfeldman6657
@frankfeldman6657 3 года назад
Philosophy, yes. Science, nope.
@karniumsden7883
@karniumsden7883 2 года назад
I think it's bold to assume that feeling means knowing that you're feeling.
Далее
A Conscious Universe? - Dr Rupert Sheldrake
1:22:44
Просмотров 1,4 млн
ТАРАКАН
00:38
Просмотров 370 тыс.
Китайка и Максим Крипер😂😆
00:21
Is Reality Just A Hallucination In The Brain? - Anil Seth
1:16:36
Is Reality a Controlled Hallucination? - with Anil Seth
1:04:04
How did consciousness evolve? - with Nicholas Humphrey
49:35
Is consciousness an illusion? 5 experts explain
43:53
ТАРАКАН
00:38
Просмотров 370 тыс.