The Soviet super tank that defeated Germany - KV-6 

thats a sad pin

@@the-je6zn nuh-uh

Note to the script writer it is described as a "hull down position" a " turret down position " is an upsidedown tank common in Australia obviously. 🤗

Last

Have a cupcake. 🧁

Weight: I'm even more tired

True

The transmission: *Incomprehensible agonized screeching*

Don't you mean " comrade " ?

_You get tired when I give you the permission to get tired comrade_ - Soviet Commissar (with a *thicc* Russian accent)

Oh the irony...

Squire Hitler: "A ton for every year of the Reich!" "Oh, I thought you wanted a heavy tank."

​@@joshuabessire9169 = 13 tons - a few months. Madman says "is that it?"

Its not even a contest bro... Ever heard of the P1000?

The Germans actually won that race with a tank so big it could barely move at 1kmperhour speed when it was no breaking.... 😂

"Can't fire at each other, can't fire all from the same side... what good is this tank for?"

@@etsequentia6765 Anti-air, apparently.

Love that you put 3D modeling effort into it. The model looks amazing!

@@Rob_F8F what do you mean? this tank is real..

Too you as well!!!

same

Exactly, as Stalin negatively referred to a five turret tank as a department store... Not to mention that a tank this long would frequently throw its tracks off just in testing, assuming that an engine(s) & gearbox(s) could be designed to produce or handle that much torque in the first place...

The difference is that someone actually considered the Ratte, while this "KV-6" is 100% fake.

it gets worse. apparently there was on idea/plan to put the 800mm railway artillary gun on the ratte and would weigh in a low 1500 tons

@@promptedleek4829 Nah, the version with the SUPERBIG gun was estimated to be even heavier. Because the Schwerer Gustav 80cm railway cannon already weighed in at 1350 ton. That's with zero armor, zero propulsion, zero nothing beyond minimal requirements as a railroad mobile cannon lavette. The "1000" in the name is actually the estimated weight in tons. But same as with the E-series tanks being developed, there was quite some variation. The E-50 for example would likely have been in the 60-70t range if serialproduced.

Pretty sure the tank your talking about is the KV-8 not 6

It is the KV-8/KV-8S you're talking about.

@@tonk4866 KV-6 This vehicle was a flamethrower variant. At least four were used in the battle of Leningrad. It is not to be confused with the fictional KV-VI super heavy tank, built by modeler Brian Fowler in 1995. KV-8 (102) - A KV-1 fitted with the ATO-41 flamethrower in the turret, beside a machine gun.[citation needed] In order to accommodate the new weapon, the 76.2 mm gun was replaced with a smaller 45 mm gun M1932, though it was disguised to look like the standard 76 mm (the cannon was placed inside a 76 mm tube). KV-8S (35) - The same as KV-8 but based on KV-1S. Equipped with ATO-42 flamethrower (improved version of ATO-41).[28] The smaller turret of the KV-1S caused space limitations, so 25 of the KV-8S had the original KV-8 turret mated to the KV-1S hull, while the remaining 10 had a KV-1S turret with ATO-42 flamethrower but lacked the coaxial machine gun. KV-8M - Upgraded version of KV-8S. Equipped with two flamethrowers. Two prototypes were constructed.

@@petergray2712 KV-6 This vehicle was a flamethrower variant. At least four were used in the battle of Leningrad. It is not to be confused with the fictional KV-VI super heavy tank, built by modeler Brian Fowler in 1995. KV-8 (102) - A KV-1 fitted with the ATO-41 flamethrower in the turret, beside a machine gun.[citation needed] In order to accommodate the new weapon, the 76.2 mm gun was replaced with a smaller 45 mm gun M1932, though it was disguised to look like the standard 76 mm (the cannon was placed inside a 76 mm tube). KV-8S (35) - The same as KV-8 but based on KV-1S. Equipped with ATO-42 flamethrower (improved version of ATO-41).[28] The smaller turret of the KV-1S caused space limitations, so 25 of the KV-8S had the original KV-8 turret mated to the KV-1S hull, while the remaining 10 had a KV-1S turret with ATO-42 flamethrower but lacked the coaxial machine gun. KV-8M - Upgraded version of KV-8S. Equipped with two flamethrowers. Two prototypes were constructed.

Funner fact: there were SEVERAL KV-6 including one that tested the electric engines captured from the Ferdinand Porch tanks in the battle of kursk.

Keep an eye out for the next update! 😂

Warthunder: meh already have this

@@ALV694fr

Nah, they’ll come out with anothet molot variant

WoT doesn't allow the use of multiple turrets. This would be like the Japanese super heavies with the frontal turrets that just restrict your gun depression.

Maybe very very big horses?

Maybe a stallionpower!

@@kearsargeyt8848you mean stalinium power !

I do like that 3 days ago i did stealth tanks, and now i do "anti-stealth tanks"

@@FoundAndExplained😅

@@FoundAndExplainedMaybe flying tanks would be also interesting

@@Tanks_and_Frog They have a video on that too.

​@@Tanks_and_Frog it was already done. Twice in fact. First the A-40 then the Ku-6

"It doesn't need to steer, it's going straight to Berlin!" - Stalin

"Give me 40 acres and I'll turn this rig around"!

That's neat part, you don't

I'm not sure I want to know the gear ratio.

The emperor protects

When your planet can't even afford to build Macharius heavy tanks so you are forced to improvise

Why bud lying😭

@@Acoustic_rabbittoe Shhhhh, don't make the bait obvious to the stupid ones!

Nah you're the one lying SUNNY infact I still have the selfie of me with him in the tank!

@@ChannelFish279 Gramma has that selfie in a locket around her neck to this day!

@@M0vingSaturn523I think he was the stupid one

they're too heavy.

It couldn't fly but it was amphibious. It could even be used as a submarine.

@@ddegn tank Submarine is not a thing there's no anyone could made idea about tank Submarine

@@Ryuu1010YT Dude, your exposing your military equipment ignorance. How do you think the Japanese were able to sink so many ships in Pearl Harbor? They used tank submarines. The Chinese have a whole fleet of submarine tanks in preparation to invade Taiwan. Even George Washington used a tank submarine to cross the Delaware River. The famous picture took artistic license and put Washington in a boat because it looked better than trying to depict a bunch of soldiers in submarine tank. George Washington's submarine tank is probably the most famous submarine tank there is. Don't get me started about the importance of submarine tanks in the US Civil War. I could go on about those submarine tanks for hours. Don't try to tell me there aren't any submarine tanks.

@@ddegn I was never heard about Submarine tanks I never thought that's a thing

i saw this when i was teeenager watching gerand and tanktoons.

He made a video about the Bartini ground effect craft. It should be in his channel. About the others I don't know. But look for the proposed submarine aircraft carriers. They're a doozy.

Hitler's "Maus"would deserve that title more, I guess.

well it's real, this video said so, smh.

it would be impossible unless ompa loompas were manning the tank

@@flamingpotato8906it actually wasnt

@@flamingpotato8906its a kitbash of some old modelling kits, wasnt even drawn up by the soviets

r/wooooooooooosh

Stalin’s organ was actually the nickname the Germans gave to the type of rockets fitted here. Because they looked like a pipe organ and made an eerie howling sound.

As if Germany had any planes left by the late war