This episode shows the spread of paternal DNA Haplogroup R1a in Central and Eastern Europe. In particular, among the subclades of R1a, it includes the diffusion process of Z282, particularly related to Scandinavian and Proto-Slavic.
@@jack8805 R1 splited before long time ago but Iceland was discovered in 9 century. The first viking must have R1a, I1 and R1b Y-DNA. That means the Vikings wasnt only nordics but west-Celtic and east-Slavic europeans too
The high concentration of I2a1b-L621 in north-east Romania, Moldova and central Ukraine reminds of the maximum spread of the Cucuten > Trypillian culture(4800-3000 BCE). No Y-DNA sample from this culture has been tested to date, but as it evolved as an offshoot from the Starčevo-Kőrös-Criş culture, it is likely that I2a was one of its main paternal lineages, and a founder effect could have increased considerably its frequency. The Cucuten > Trypillian culture was the most advanced Neolithic culture in Europe before the Indo-European invasions in the Bronze Age and seems to have had intensive contacts with the Steppe culture before the expansion of Yamna to the Balkans and Central Europe (see histories of R1a and R1b). From 3500 BCE, at the onset of the Yamna period in the Pontic-Caspian Steppe, the Cucuten > Trypillian people started expanding east into the steppe of what is now western Ukraine, leaving their towns (the largest in the world at the time), and adopting an increasingly nomadic lifestyle like their Yamna neighbours. It can easily be imagined that Cucuten > Trypillian people became assimilated by the Yamna neighbours and that they spread as a minority lineage alongside haplogroups R1a and R1b as they advanced toward the Baltic with the Corded Ware expansion. Alternatively, I2-L621 lineages could have lived in relative isolation from the mainstream Proto-Indo-European society somewhere around Ukraine, Poland or Belarus, then as the centuries and millennia passed, would have blended with the predominantly R1a populations around them. The resulting amalgam would have become the ancestors of the Proto-Slavs.
FN' nazi propaganda - first, educate yourself about "VINCA CULTURE"... then, about the fact that so called "slavs" - name slavs is the product of vatican...
I would appreciate very much if someone could explain what y-haplogroup was common for Achaeans, the ones who sieged Troy? Scientists say that tribe was originated from Catacomb culture. Strange enough but it’s hard to find out its main haploplogroup. Is it R1a-M458 and R1a-Z280? And if it’s so, were Achaeans belonged to these haplogroups? Because it seems a bit odd for me.
@@latakicsi2183 But the Yamnaya culture was long before the Catacomb culture. Moreover, its main y-haplogroup was R1b. So, it could be "the cradle" for Dorians but not for Achaeans.
This work is excellent--thank you for the level of detail and graphics. David Reich et al just published an updated genealogy of both modern and ancient genomes, which now extends continental migration timelines. The paper was published in Science titled, "A unified genealogy of modern and ancient genomes"--Would you regard this research valid and relevant to the channel?
Thanks for introducing an exciting thesis. I didn't have full access to the papers and data, so I didn't read them all, but I looked through the Supplementary Materials. I want to do a little more research and make a video.
@@geonomad1 You can bet I'll be watching that video! I was able to view the full paper online, and believe it was downloadable in PDF. The research might just make for some cutting edge content, friend.
FN' nazi propaganda - first, educate yourself about "VINCA CULTURE"... then, about the fact that so called "slavs" - name slavs is the product of vatican...
in the last ice age nobody travelled, in europe everybody just died out apart from socalled euhuntergathers and only because that group moved to north to iberia
Name any haplogroup as slavic is wrong. Specially 2-5000 years ago. Specially that it is a main component of all western non-slavic ethnic groups. They were the corded ware culture, possible the Yamnay culture too, because they were very similar.
@@mikimladenovic6845not true Germanic languages appeared a century or two before the Slavic ones. It was more of an equal split from previous branch than a derivation from one or the other.
Aleksa, ajd' ne seri - this is just FN' nazi propaganda - first, educate yourself about "VINCA CULTURE"... then, about the fact that so called "slavs" - name slavs is the product of vatican...
A finn-ugor , a szláv , az indo-germán ... a szkita multat veszi át...és hamisitja ..... ! Ezek a csoportok...a szkita hagyatékból élnek... !!! - így a szkita, hun, (avar) magyar hagyatékból ... ! * :)
Hello, I have one question: Does all R1a-Z283 in the Balkans came with Slavic Migrations as a whole, or could some groups brought some percentages of it in the Balkans before the Slavs (e. Goths or Dacians) via assimilation of proto-slavs and migration movements, for example? Could some R1a-M458 and R1a-Z280 came in the Balkans with Gothic, Gepid, Geto-Dacian or Celtic migrations that assimilated Slavs in the movements and then came in the Balkans as part of these other ethnicities? Can we say for sure that every R1a-Z280 and R1a-M458 in the Balkans came with Slavic Migrations, or it's likely just the majority? Eupedia says that R1a-M458 and R1a-Z280 in the Balkans are mostly associated with the Slavic migrations, but 'most' doesn't mean necessarily all of them, right? I know the question might sound weird, but I have some doubts in regards to it. I hope you can help me! I would like to hear your opinion about it! Thanks in advance!
@@mekss7844Wow, interesting! thank you for the info :) Were also some I2a1b-CTS10228 found as well from pre-slavic era like R1a or did I2a1b-din come exclusively with Slavs? I heard that some of it came with Goths or Dacians, Pannoian Vlachs along with some Balto Slavic R1a, in the IV-VI century period. Could it be true? It seems I2a in the Balkans is even more associated with the slavic migration than balto slavic R1a. What do you think?
@@MsSirAndy, i think that the presence of i2a among the Slavs is due to Roman expansion into Dacia. Some north Balkan tribes crossed the Dniester and mixed with the ancestors of the Slavs, for example, the Bastarns. Prior to the Slavic migration, the Iranian r1a prevailed in the Balkans, which is due to the neighboring Scythians and Sarmatians, but the Balto-Slavic r1a is also found. It is still not clear exactly how they got there and with whom (Germanic tribes or Scythians?)
@@mekss7844 I see, that means that even some I2a in the Balkans is Dacian/Vlach, some is Slavic and some even east Germanic as well. But most of them came with Slavs, over half of it I think.
@@MsSirAndy so far no I-Y3120 has been found outside of the medieval Slavic and Slavic like viking context. On the other hand, we have R-M458 in late Hallstatt, R-M58>L1029>YP263 in Czechia La Tene, and R-M458 in Hungary La Tene. Including R-Z280 in La Tene. The Hallstatt and Czech samples were predominantly Italo-Celtic, and Celto-Germanic with 25-30% iron age Ingrian-like ancestry and the Hungary La Tene sample was predominantly Balto-Slavic like. It seems that these 3 lineages converged/coalesced together and bottlenecked and had founder effects as a result of the Slavic migrations.
in ENG: Great video, discussing the topic of Slavic halogroup R1a made in a clear, transparent and quite accurate way. I give a rating of 10/10, good job, thank you for the video! in PL: Świetny film, omówienie tematu Słowiańskiej halogrupy R1a wykonane w sposób klarowny, przejrzysty i dość dokładny. Daję ocenę 10/10, dobra robota, dziękuję za film!
FN' nazi propaganda - first, educate yourself about "VINCA CULTURE"... then, about the fact that so called "slavs" - name slavs is the product of vatican...
R1b comes from Africa. Currently the biggest concentration of R1b is in Nigeria. After that is Spain and Portugal. It does explain migration from Africa via the Gibraltar strait.
"A group of people with YAP insertion migrated from south Asia to Central Asia and reached to the Mediterranean. They gave rise to E lineage (Hammer et al. 1998) with mutations at M40 and M96. The E lineage dispersed to Africa, Middle East, Southen and Eastern Europe. Lineage E1 is predominant over entire Africa and at lesser frequency in Middle East and Europe. This back migration of people to Africa through the Levant is supported by Hammer et al. (1997), Altheide and Hammer (1997), Chandrasekar et al. (2007), Cruciani et al. (2004) and Cabrera et al. (2018). YAP+ E migrated back to Africa with other Eurasian haplogroups, such as lineage RIb]* (18-23 kya) and lineage T (39-45 kya), which has been observed at high frequency in northern Cameroon, and in low frequencies in Africa (Cruciani et al. 2002; Luis et al. 2004)" ~Genomic diversity in people of India : focus on mtDNA and Y-Chromosome polymorphism / Anthropological Survey of India Publication: Singapore : Springer, [2021]
I2b was also prevalent among the early slavs... hence its high percentages in the balkans (in the exact places where historiography shows slavs settled)
FN' nazi propaganda - first, educate yourself about "VINCA CULTURE"... then, about the fact that so called "slavs" - name slavs is the product of vatican...
So Z282 is Baltic? As is known, Balts mixed with Finugrs and then there was a large area where both Balts and Finns had similar YDNA. Then the Slavic minority came in and assimilated the Balt and Finugr majority in northern Russia.
@@Andrei-ev7du Probably because those nations assimilated them (I mean the Serbs). Arkona was destroyed a long time ago. And the Germans were killing them so that they remained only Lusatian Serbs. Similar to how the Albanians exterminated the Serbs in Kosovo today. And today's Ukraine was also inhabited by Serbs, look at the historical facts. The problem is that even today the Germans hide that all Slavs are Serbs, but not all Serbs are Slavs. It's like saying the English are Proto-Americans. Serbs - Servi - Veni - Wendi.
Are you sure that the Finns and Balts were in the majority and absorbed by the Slavic minority?After all, the territories where the Finns and Balts lived were sparsely populated, and the locals (Fins and Balts) were not engaged in agriculture and farming, so many people could not live in those territories, but when the Slavs began to come to these lands, they brought with them agriculture and farming, from- because of this, there were more Slavs, they could afford more food, and when the Mongols came to the steppes, very large streams of Slavs poured into the northeast, you can compare the names of cities in the northeast central Russia and in the west of present-day Ukraine.
Modern Turkish people are overwhelmingly Middle Eastern and Southern european in origin. Their ancestors were overwhelmingly the Anatolians A small minority of Turks carry DNA from the Turkic invasions. Anatonian Turks will never admit this，because their real brothers (Arabs,Armenians, Greeks, Iranians, Kurds ...） consider them enemies，that doesn't match Turk political propaganda😂😂
@@user-rn6nb2ey7e Old articles or genetic tests are not reliable sources. After 2018, the science of genetics experienced rapid development. Any article that does not use G25 or qpAdm can’t be considered a reliable source. Also most Y-DNA lineages in Turkey are not Anatolian but Central Asian subclades.
No, I2 oldest Europeans on Balkans speak also Slavic language. And it was spoken not long before before in wider area: north Greece, Albania, Romania, Hungary, north-east Italy, east Austria and east Germany.
Your language is slavic, your main haplogroup I2a-Din originated in west ukraine/south poland around 100 A.D. Guess what, it's very present in northern carpathians/moldova, where you came from. Illyrians major haplogroups were ev13 and j2b and are considered to have mediterranean appearence and tombs all across dalmatia and bosnia show they were mediterranean, aka genetically related to albanians. Ancient people weren't blond haired blue eyed, they were dark, mediterranean albanian/italian looking. Take a look a the sicilians, they are dark and 1.78m tall on average, pretty similar to ancient south europeans. Serbians and croats came to the balkans later, THERE'S NO SHAME IN THAT, you were slavs who arrived here, nothing strange. Your migration here is documented, and no slavs were present here prior to the 7th century. Get over it, your recent invented history won't change reality.
@@southepirote7676 I am following haplogroup reasearching from beggining in 00s, before any possible political changings, and "i" haplogroup was oldest European, abour 30.000 years old, emerged on Balkans since in rest of the Europe was ice age. It later migrated to Scandinavia, Britain, Sardinia... Ukraine. Native to Ukraine&Russia area is R1a haplogroup, not "I", and two different haplogroups didnt orginate in same area
@@alexandartheserb7861No. I2 oldest sample was found in Switzerland and in skeleton in Britain old as 13000yrs. It didn't emerged in Balkan and this guy above is albanian and albanians are not Ilyrians
my family name "Rivera" comes from the alphs / northern Italy and im RomanMexican "RoMex" so i have a lot of Hispana blood and Visigoth we lived on Slavic border with Ukrain / Romania 300 years two of my family names is Basque us Mexica natives come from Lake Baikal
The earliest date R1a was found in 3500 BCE. It is uncertain whether R1a existed at that time as the Vinča culture is faster. I'm preparing a video about R1b right now, so you'll be able to check it out soon.
@@geonomad1 thank you so much for your answer please just one more question is it true that R1A haplogroup is Slavic and R1B haplogruop is Celtic branch if so are they first relatives between each other... thank you for your answer
Very intense presentation that encompasses a lot of time and intermingling of peoples. I am lead to wonder what "covid vaccines" are truly for, presently. Especially, since "covid" is a manmade mutation.
Tianyuan is not ancestral to modern populations. Not sure why some people are so obsessed with a South Asian coastal route for (Northern) k2b but it simply didn't happen
@@petarswift5089 R1a is present among Serbs in about 12-14%. Serbs are descendants of old Balkan population (Illyrians, Tracians, Dardanians etc) mixed with incoming Slavs. More than 52% of Serbian genetics is Slavic.....and more than 32% Serbs have old Balkan haplogroups (E, J, R1b) and also post-Slavic (G, C, N etc)..... That's why Serbs are tall and strong, and have dark hair :) Like, Hungarians have more Slavic R1a, than South-Slavs (except Slovenians, which have higher percent of R1a).
I don't believe in Aryan theory but There is a tribe in kerala called thiyya which shows a jentics and linguistics origin in the thian sha mountains of central asia according to the linguistics the Iranian word deva is first mentioned in Sanskrit in 2 century BCE and it originated from proto indo European language 'dievo' many proto indo european language has this word with same meening which meens in english as 'shining' or divine this word changes in to thiya in central asia thiyan sha mountains that meens mountains of god/deva and one particular hindhu caste in kerala called thiya meens 'divyan' in native language malayalam wich meens in english shining or divine also practices theyyam/ daivam or god as their religious rituals and their oral folk storys and songs clearly mentions they came from somewhere else meening of the word thiyya is divine and the first place where genitics and linguistics both meet together is the beginning of the tian Sha mountains and indo-sythrians religion is an ancient greek religion and buddisam mixture and thiyyas shows an almost same mixture with hindhuism and thiyya have a rich marshel treditions in recorded history and their folk songs and fougrin records from 16th century onwards clearly shows they are the one who practiced and developed kalaripayattu to the world and thiyyar is the only hindhu warrior caste in entire india which formed 3 European colonial army regiments in their own caste name with Britishers they formed thiyya regiment and with french they formed french thiyya pattalam and with dutch they formed dutch chegons the chekars are a warrior section among thiyyas who's duty is to fight in wars and they are ethinically from Malabar north kerala and all this units are started to form in 1730s onwards and all royal force in kerala before Indian indipendance had thiyya soldiers in their force and in entire south india there is no other hindhu caste ever had a caste based army regiment with any colonial European powers but in north India Britishers started few other warrior caste army regiments also and latest gentical study from Indian government institutions like center for cellular science and molecular biology in Hyderabad also clearly shows thiyyas have central asian anciant Iranian ancestry and in sre lankan history srilankan people also consider thiya/Divya as indo sythrians and devas even german nazi seintists before Indian indipendance also came this area to study these groups but indian government is now trying to eliminate this caste people from history now all their historical records are only getting from outside sources and trying to mix with a south kerala caste called ezhava a native caste which never even allowed to take a sword or never ever participated in a royal army or a war before Indian indipendance according to the recorded history and they blocked all thiyya Wikipedia pages from 2013 and blocked remaining thiyyar pages in 2022 even the smallest caste in india has their own wiki pages thiyyas are the biggest hindhu caste in Malabar kerala and with the support of government they are changing all thiyya warriors as ezhavas and because of thiyyas fougrin origin government also trying to eliminate thiyya community from all records to localise or indianise Indian history even more deeper
About 60,000 years ago, C2D1 entered East Asia, and C1 entered Southeast Asia About 40,000 years ago,K2 split into MNOPQRS entered East Asia and Siberia from Southeast Asia SM remained in Southeast Asia NO remained in East Asia PQR remained in Siberia About 30,000 years ago, QR separated About 20,000 years ago R went to Europe and Q went to America Therefore, Native Americans：Q1 C2 R1 As the climate began warming at around 18,000 years ago, the Beringia region also became more moist and the sea level rose,submerging the land bridge . About 10,000-15,000 years ago, N1O2 entered Mongolia and mixed with C2Q1R1 About 5000-10000 years ago Xiongnu/（C2 N1a O2a Q1）+ R1a→Xianbei → Rouran → Turkic Empire →Mongol Empire→ Qing Empire Mongolian=53,8%C2+10,8%O2+10,8%N1+4,6%P* (xQ,R)+9,2%R1a Ulch people 34.6%C2(xM48, M407) 34.6% C2b1a2 11.5% O2, 1.9% O1a,1.9% O1b 5.8%Q-M242 5.8%N-M231 Then，proto-Altaic people split into two groups N1a and O2a+C2 1，N1a enter Siberia，they became the Neo-Siberians and Northern tungus (absorb Paleo-Siberians Q1+C2) 2，O2a+C2 enter the Korean peninsula,where they assimilated the earlier inhabitants of the peninsula(O1b). During the Yayoi period, haplogroup O1b2+O2a started to arrive and spreaded to every region of Japan. Origin of Japanese: Jomon (D1a2+C1a1) + Korean peninsula /Yayoi (O2a+O1b2). Korean=42.1%O2a+3.1%O1a+ 12.9%C2+ 3.8 %N1+ 33.4%O1b + 1.8%Q1+2.5%D Janpanese= 15-20%O2a 3-8%C1+C2 3%N1 30-35%O1b 35-40%D 3，Historians believe that the Huns were not a single ethnicity but a confederation-like grouping of Siberian natives（N1a Q1 C2） and Indo-European tribes（R1aR1b，Old European（I ））. The Slavs, Hungarians, Finns are among their descendants. 4，The modern Turkic people are a mixture of Eurasian People. These includes Indo-Iranian and Indo-European tribes of Central Asia who becomes Turkic for 2000 years ago. "Origin of "Proto-Altaic" language=Turkic+Mongolic+Tungusic+Uralic+Koreanic+Japonic" R1 dominates Indo-European languages R1a dominant Slavs + Indo-Iranians (Pashtuns, Iranians, Indians) R1b dominant Western European Q dominates Native American，Inuit people, Yenisei people N dominates Urals and Yakutia O dominate Japanese Korean Chinese C2 dominates Mongolian Kazakh Tungusic Mongoloid people= East Asians, Austronesians, Altaic people (Turkic, Mongolic, and Tungusic speaking people), American Indians/Native Americans Inuit have 80% Q Yakutia have 90%N Korean have 80%O North Tungusic have 80%C2 They were completely East Asian physical appearance (what used to be called Mongoloid)
Turkic R1A is undoubtwdly from Buryatia lol, not from your Aryan fantasy :) Keyser et al. 2020, pp. 1, 8-9. "[O]ur findings confirmed that the Xiongnu had a strongly admixed mitochondrial and Y-chromosome gene pools and revealed a significant western component in the Xiongnu group studied.... [W]e propose Scytho-Siberians as ancestors of the Xiongnu and Huns as their descendants... [E]ast Eurasian R1a subclades R1a1a1b2a-Z94 and R1a1a1b2a2-Z2124 were a common element of the Hun, Avar and Hungarian Conqueror elite and very likely belonged to the branch that was observed in our Xiongnu samples. Moreover, haplogroups Q1a and N1a were also major components of these nomadic groups, reinforcing the view that Huns (and thus Avars and Hungarian invaders) might derive from the Xiongnu as was proposed until the eighteenth century but strongly disputed since... Some Xiongnu paternal and maternal haplotypes could be found in the gene pool of the Huns, the Avars, as well as Mongolian and Hungarian conquerors."
@@user-rn6nb2ey7e Old articles or genetic tests are not reliable sources. After 2018, the science of genetics experienced rapid development. Any article that does not use G25 or qpAdm can’t be considered a reliable source.
Kind of. But not really. This video didn't quite show Slavic gene as much as the general east European branch of the Indo-European. And Iranian is Indo-European... It makes sense.
Attention the Slavic genetic heritage among the Serbs, and the rest of the Slavic peoples in the Balkans is very minimal haplogroup R1a, does not exceed 50% in some Slavic countries such as Croatia, Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina. There are several theories on the original home of the Slavs the last is that of the Danube according to Florin Curta a Romanian historian
Your language is slavic, your main haplogroup I2a-Din originated in west ukraine/south poland around 100 A.D. Guess what, it's very present in northern carpathians/moldova, where you came from. Illyrians major haplogroups were ev13 and j2b and are considered to have mediterranean appearence and tombs all across dalmatia and bosnia show they were mediterranean, aka genetically related to albanians. Ancient people weren't blond haired blue eyed, they were dark, mediterranean albanian/italian looking. Take a look a the sicilians, they are dark and 1.78m tall on average, pretty similar to ancient south europeans. Serbians and croats came to the balkans later, THERE'S NO SHAME IN THAT, you were slavs who arrived here, nothing strange. Your migration here is documented, and no slavs were present here prior to the 7th century. Get over it, your recent invented history won't change reality.
You are very wrong about this ,, early Estland" by the way. This territory was populated after last ice age approximately 10000 years before. And not by Finno-ugric tribes who came much later. Language has nothing to do with genetic origin. Kunda culture was long before cordculture came and it was mostly by trade routs.
The Proto and Early Slavs have expanded with the haplogroups I2a1b-Din, R1a-M458, R1a-M417, R1a-M558, and R1a-Z283. There are no pre-Slavic I2a1b-Din findings, and the totality of I2a1b-Din finds are Early and Medieval Slavs and the vast majority are found north, not south of the Danube. There are more I2a1b-Din historical Slavic findings than R1a historical Slavic findings, and outside the South Slavic landmass, I2a1b-Din forms a major lineage in Ukraine, Romania, Moldova, Cont. Greece, Belarus, Slovakia, and southeastern Poland.
I2a1b-Din i.e. especially branch I-Y3120 (mostly present in today's Serbs and Croats) is historically associated with Bastrani tribe of Celtic/Germani ancestry. When I2a arrived among local R1a population, proto-Slavs were created and they started expanding to north, west, and south.
@@NekoImeni No, it is not, there are no pre-Slavic I2a1b-Din findings, and the mutation itself emerged in Belarus, therefore it cannot be Northern, let alone Western Germanic in origin. It is the most present among Croats, Bosnian Muslims, and Serbs because of its concentration, whereas in sheer numbers, and even comparable concentration, it is one of the major lineages in Ukraine, Romania, Belarus, Southeastern Poland, and southwestern Russia. Furthermore, its highest diversity of clades is found in the Belarus-Poland-Ukraine triangle. I suggest all self-loathing Slavs stop LARPing as extinct non-Slavs, first it was Illyrians, and now it's the Bastarnae, talk about desperate and pitiful.
@@numenoreaneternity6682 Do you claim I2-Y3120 (I2a1b-Din came from another planet? Just a reality check : No need for hard feelings. Slavs were created not so long ago, from different haplogroups population, living for some time in same area.... Previous and after, migrations happened. I2-Y3120 was present in Bastranae people, which were Celtic of Germanic, for sure. One branch of I2-Y3120 came to Greece as Bastranae (it is present in Greece and across Balkan even today), and other branch (also Bastranae) moved and mixed with R1a, to create proto-Slavic, from that branch I2-PH908 emerged (present among South Slavs with TMRCA only 1700 ybp).
@@NekoImeni The lineage that you're referring to, I-Y81696, is a rare lineage on the verge of extinction and it's Y3120's sister clade, the same goes for the rare lineage found in Greece which is downstream of Y3120. YFull is very clear on the matter, Y3120's TMRCA is set to only 2200 years in Belarus, not Northern or Western Europe, and it's a founder-effect Y-DNA, to boot. To this day, all of the archaeogenetic I2a1b-Din samples are found among Early and Medieval Slavs, and the Y-DNA is absent among tested East Germanic cultures (Wielbark, Kowalenko) and it's even absent in the Tollense culture which is Proto-Germanic, and ancestral to the Bastarnae, who were, at least originally, Germanic in origin. The only one in need of a reality check is you, stop LARPing as dead ethnicities, or worse, attributing a Proto-Slavic lineage to dead ethnicities.
@@numenoreaneternity6682 I-Y18331 ? What about that Bastarnae branch? "Accidentally" skipped. Bastarnae were Celtic or Germanic.... or most likely Celtic, but they Germanized.... And then they were mixed with local R1a population north of Black Sea, and Proto-Slav mass were created. Just a fun fact, Proto-Slavic were not created by God, but from different group of people, of different haplogroups, and they belonges to different people, different tribes, different languages backgrounds etc..... I believe you are a Nazi, but Slavic-Nazi :) :) lol
World first cultures Lepenski vir, Starcevo, Vinca culture today Serbia. World first industrial revolution ca. 6000 BC. Bronze metallurgy. (BBC History news March 2010) Gordon Childe-The Danube in Prehistory, Jacque Pirenne-Agriculture at Danube Farming start about 6000 BC. Vinca First Calendar start to count years at 5508 BC. Farming wouldn’t be possible without knowledge of calendar. Both development started and developed together. Harald Harman about first cyrillic writings in Vinca culture in 5500 BC so 2000 years before any writings anywhere else on the world. Vinca Iron production 1400 BC. In today English language there is more than 2000 same or similar Serbian words. Names of the Balkan tribes: Pelasgians, Mycenaeans, Etruscan, Wendi, Illiyrians, Dardanians, Moesians, Dacians, Tracians, Rasci, Celts, Scythians, Sarmatians, Arians, Sea People, Peleset, Philistines, Hittites, Bhrygians, Etruscan. Tribes spread in all directions ……. Wild Greeks arived ~ 1000 BC from Egipt, Hungarian from Asia and Bulgariens from Asia they found culture on the Balkans, writings and language and they mixed with domestic people.
It doesn't matter who your ancestors were, what matters is what values you identify with, because if you hurt other people, considering them inferior to yourself, then you are simply an animal that has a long evolutionary path before becoming a human.
Even if you were to be proven right about (y)our genetic brethren being super smart way back when, you would be wrong as that pertained yourself, as boasting is not smart at all. Nor is bragging about something you never achieved yourself, like being born. Genetic potential must be realized by cultivating it. A more comprehensive definition of intelligence than what is measured by I.Q. tests would factor in having social graces like using smart communication practices.
R1a is Slavic or proto Slavic would be a better term as the term Slavic was given to these people in the years AD, in deep antiquity this term didnt exist, this term means FAMOUS or GLORIOUS, they got this name because they were fighting with the Roman empire and they were winning in some countries/parts of the world, people of other descent with other haplogroups were often Slavized and now we say that for example a country is Slavic but only 405 of the people are really Slavic, the rest just uses this name as a general name to their whole society plus the part of the haplogroup R1a that went to India, Central Asia, Iran, etc got their own names from native people of those areas, example of such name is Aryans
thats way some people claim that Slavs came to Europe in 5th/6th century and run of Mythical Germans etc., becuase the term Slav didnt exist in deep antiquity so obviously you dont find it in texts regarding to people from Central and East Europe but Germania was just a geographical name given to Slavic lands by thre Romans, its not a nations name in deep antiquity Slavic peoples were know under different names, Romans called them Germans (people occupying Germania) or Sarmatians, Greeks called them Scythians, different neighbours called them different name but they always say in their chronicles that all these people are the same language, the same culture, the same religion and same descent in modern times German (Deutches) are trying to steal Slavic history and claim it as their own, because in reality they dont have any of their own history, they are a mixture of Slavs, Old Europeans and Celts, their like the bastards of Europe they claim that the term Slav is derived from english word Slave, but when this term was given to these people the english language didnt exist so how could the term Slave (which didn't exist at that time) be given to the Slavs?
Sanskrit is not an old language - the languages that were actually old in North Indian subcontinent was Prakrit and Pali languages. There is a huge amount of confusion about Prakrit languages. There are 12 major North Indian languages 1, Apabhraṃśa (Prakrit); 2. Ardhamagadhi(Prakrit); 3. Dramili (oldest Prakrit); 4. Elu; 5. Gandhari; 6. Kamarupi; 7. Magadhi; 8. Maharashtri; 9. Paishachi; 10. Pali (also mentioned as Prakrit by some kingdoms); 11. Shauraseni; 12. Khasa. But each language is different and a few are referred as Prakrit language at different times especially the Dramili is the language used in the Ashoka edicts as Prakrit language which is the oldest written record for Pali and Prakrit. Ancient India had used Pali and Prakrit languages in Jainism and Buddhism literatures. Sanskrit is a new language that was created by refining, merging and choosing grammar and verbiage of all these 12 major languages- that’s why there is no record of written Sanskrit in ancient monuments of Jainism and Buddhism in Pali literature which were the oldest religions of Ancient India. Hence the claim to Sanskrits to be old is not proven and even Rig Veda is first written down in 14th century AD and all claims are only verbal and they wrongly point to the written literature records of Prakrit or Pali languages as Sanskrit. Hindi is formed much later by choosing the largest spoken dialect of Prakrit in the present day Uttar Pradesh. So it very clear that anything written in Sanskrit is newly written literature after Sanskrit was formed.
@@Agnostic7773 Prakrit has both spoken and written versions but Sanskrit was a verbally transmitted language until it was finally scripted as a written language. Liguistics would have only compared the written languages of Indo European langugages. If they had included the current witten version of Sanskrit, then it is probably Prakrit as Sanskrit was built from many dialects of Prakrit languages, Pali and Persian which is why it is called Refined language - "Sans kriti". The researchers found the gap and distance between the current Sanskrit and Indo European languages that is why they proposed a possible language called "Vedic Sanskrit" which do no have any record both verbally or as written record.
@@AlexVembar thats not my question How prakrit is Indo European language? Panini(500BCE) invented grammar for sanskrit not for prakrit or tamil.. Right?
@@Agnostic7773 There is no record of this in any form. It is just a claim. A birch bark manuscript from Kashmir of the Rupavatara, a grammatical textbook based on the Sanskrit grammar of Pāṇini (dated 1663) en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birch_bark_manuscript This is the oldest record of physical written record of Panni grammer. If you know any record for 500 BCE please share.
@@Agnostic7773 Tamil vs Prakrit or Pali or Sanskrit or any other indo european languages do not have any common grammer or origin. Tamils oldest written record is from Tamil Brahmi inscription in Keeladhi, Madurai from 580 BCE - 500 CE (carbon dated from one of the top layered pot shell with Tamilili script inscription and the deeper pits were not allowed by the Central Govt. of India due to fear to loosing their story). The grammar of Tamil is Tholkappiam written by Tholkappiar not Panini en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tolk%C4%81ppiyam
Find out who founded Ukraine, bro. In the Ukrainian city of Slavyanorserbsk, there is an unusual cultural monument of Cossacks, Serbs and Russians and the inscription "There are no bonds more sacred than those of brotherhood".
Yea, why would anyone call a slavic haplogroup with I2a1 same as the germanic haplogroups are named I1 and I2a2 ?!?! It is a hoax, the preparation for a genocide which is already taking place worldwide, they call themselves the same but are totally different hominid composition!! We should all work together to solve this mistake and rename the slavic group to something as R1aJ2 variant or R1c !!!
The germanic I1 and I2 are not related with the slavic I2x in Croatia etc...!! They named it deliberately wrong to disguise the slavic genocide against the germanic people ://
This video is wrong in so many ways that it's a headache to even unpackage it all. The fact L1029 was just pushed to North East Europe is wrong in so many ways. The highest concentration and diversity of this line is in Poland, East Germany and Czechia. Almost all of it in NE Europe is related to the Polish-Lithuainian Commonwealth. There's also the ancient La Tene sample from Bohemia in Czechia that was L1029 from the Iron Age. There's alot more wrong here.
I'm Serb but I'll acknowledge that these people can't be considered Slavs They are at best proto-slavs, but more appropriately they are proto even that. Proto even Balts. They are simply Indo-Europeans
Yea, both criminal rapists cannibal cavemen °° One of their caves in Belgium the other in Croatia, in both they cannibalized other hominids, same as they still doing today but they shifted more to bestiality °`
@@c4rt3ls.The Germanic people were know to commit g...c..de on non Germanics including us Slavs and others such as the Magyars or the Romani people, even the Celts and Pics of Brittain ended up taken over by inv...ding Angles and Saxons
@@c4rt3ls.C0l0n1sation. The 3limin4tion of Polabians, Caranthians, Pics, Celts. Germanic hablogroup has to be the most 3vil one by far, next to the M0ngols
Gondosan ügyel arra , nehogy a kiindulópont a Kárpátok legyen..... ! Pedig az a kiindulópont... ! 3 x - osan is az..... Beleértve ; Cro - magnont ! Valamint a Drio - pitechust ..... ..... :)
I resume this to the point: r1a is also called the aryan gene, haplogroup. It is also called the persian Haplogroup and it originated in Persia/Iran. Later on they went to india and Asia where mongols r#ped the persian women and from there the amazon women were born. They meet the Cimmerians in Crimea and they married giving the origin of r1a1 and even R1A1a1 what is finally known as the aryan race. For that reason Belarusians, polish, Baltics are all white, light blue eyes and blonde. In 1933 they persuade hitler to create the aryan ideal and this included to wipe the hebrews. They sent their women to the hebrews to infiltrate and from there the liberal leftism was born and all the world went to waste, courtesy of Slavs, the most demonic thing ever existed with the rat eaters from asia. Time has given the reason to the Austrian artist.
DNA analysis is great for studyng migration of people. Political history is a different genre and in the best form it does not include fairy tales grouping people based on their ancestry. In the case fairy tales are included, nowadays it is sometimes reffered to as racism.
@@thomasl2974 Slavs didn't migrate I mean, they are still in the same place they were 2000 years ago, it's not that now the population of Ukraine or Poland are different than the scythians at the times of jesus, yes some of them went around the times of WW2 to argentina and that's why the people from the capital are white especially the women with light blue eyes. The slavic genes are progressive, if anyone marries them, their ancestry is gonna be absorved by the slavic one and the original ethinicty will dissappear.
Wenedowie to slowianie. Wedrowcy. Filistyni, Fenicjanie, Etruskowie, jak i Trojanie. TRI, TRZY, to slowianskie trzy. Trojan to nic innego jak Triglaw , TriMurti. Jak Swiatowitt to Brahma. Np. BRZESC na wschodzie, Brest na zachodzieBrescia na poludniu. To nazwa brzegowa w naszym Lahickim jezyku.
Don't lay...dont egsisting Sloven slavs ho you say-existin Rasen ( White Rasa) and Raseni is not from Asia Raseni is from Danubian ....stop with lay history...
Hi, your movie is nice but Slavic and Baltic Folk was not existent to the time of Cordware culture, and the Cordware culture is not in Yamnaya Culture, they occupied Samartia (EastEurope) northly of Yamnaya and mixed with this along the border. Second : Cordware people was Raider and Drivers with Horses what migrated to Middle Europe about northern Carpathes and with Farmer Culture the globular Amphore Culture of a land way, Yamnaya was Sheep & Cow herders and what migrated along the Danube Route, her Water Highway. This is not a good way for horses... Early Estland (ugrian-uralic Speaker) was migrated from Ural around 1500 BC not earlier. Why: Slavic Nations have not one Source, Southern Slavs are very difficult from Western Slavs and Eastern Slavs and a difference between middle europe germans and western slavs is not existent before 800 AD (who is born slavic language by Kyrill and Method). They are different from Eastern Slavs (in today Belarus/Russia) what has more roots in Ural mammoth hunter what migrated from Mal'ta/Baikal (24.000 to 9000 BP e.g. Shirin gol idol and uralic caves). With other words slavs has not one root, they have three roots. First root is the greco-thracian-dacian-danubian Complex with expansion along the Adria coast, Second root is the lost Eastern German tribes and 3. root was the Mammoth Hunter what came from Baikal Lake. Slavic is a product of late roman chronists after the justinian pestilence with the fall of all eastgerman kindoms and lots of sclavs from falling westrom empire. They have found germanic runes in Moravia, Bohemia, Poland and other west slavic nations. Karl the great hat not make a difference between Danish, polish, pommeranian and eastgerman humans - they all peoples was for franks "Sclavos", a addaption from greco-byzantic "sklavini". Justinian himself created the fake news from not more existent eastgerman tribes like Vandales, Gepides and Ostrogotes. His Order was "Germans was killed from Justinian", now they was Sklavini = wild sclavs. In the next 200 Years, this "wild Sclavs" builded new tribes in Romania - they spoken vulgar roman, more northly they spoken east germans and in south western they spoken a vulgar greek (e.g. Albania). Karl the great created a franconian kingdom and croatian, slowenian, polish, lusatian and bohemian lords came to him and he gave then the christian title duce. This all is part of a contract between franconian Karl and Eastrom Imperator, what set the slavs under the byzantinic church with language of kyrill and his brother method and tribut to karl the great. slavic lords forced her tribes to learn the new "christian" language via churches as part of independent ducates. But than came the hungarians and slavic duces sponsored the papst of rome, what cut her Vasall status. Byzanz created Bolgarian Khar and Russian Zar, and Pius the german adopt the duce of bohemia and was created slavic Piasten Dynastie with father Pias alias Pius the german. Slavic people can not accept her real history. But german runic ABC is found in earliest prager culture what shows, they spoken eastgermans. Slavic language has a great part of loan word from middle roman and byzantinic greek language from Middleage (after 800 AD), but not from late roma time vulgar latin (before 600 AD). Baltic history is not other and next to late east germans and great influence of russia/Rus. baltic and westslavic has more than 10.000 word with root in german but southern and eastern slavs has lots of loanwords from latin and bycantinic greek.
The 2006 Y-DNA study results "suggest that the Slavic expansion started from the territory of present-day Ukraine, thus supporting the hypothesis that places the earliest known homeland of Slavs in the basin of the middle Dnieper".[56] According to genetic studies until 2020, the distribution, variance, and frequency of the Y-DNA haplogroups R1a and I2 and their subclades R-M558, R-M458, and I-CTS10228 among South Slavs are correlated with the spreading of Slavic languages during the medieval Slavic expansion from Eastern Europe, most probably from the territory of present-day Ukraine and Southeastern Poland.[57][58][59][60][61][62][63]. Unlike Anatolian Turks and the Azeris, all Slavs score predominately in Slavic Y-DNA. Among South Slavs, the dominant Y-DNA lineages are I2a1b-Din, R1a, and then E1b. Your obsession with East and South Slavs is amusing, you specifically project all of the Turkish inferiorities on the South Slavs - just to cope with the fact that they've paved a highroad with the skulls of nearly a dozen Turkish peoples, starting with the Pannonian Avars.
E and J do not exceed 20% in South Slavs. I2 is considered slavic, hence 25-30% in Belarusians, Ukranians and some region of Poland, Czech republic and Slovakia
@@grimgolum6068 Центр чего? Там схематически показано. Славяне возникли в ареале Зарубинецкой культурьі - єто Полесье (Северная Украина и юг Беларуси). Далее позднезарубинецкие памятники распространились в Восточную Польшу.
@@ninjaentrepreneur3578 R1b1a2a represents the largest haplogroup for ARMENIANS in general and project members in particular. It has been estimated to be 8,000 years old.
@@ninjaentrepreneur3578 TOGARMAH (Hebrew: תֹּגַרְמָה Tōgarmā) is a figure in the "table of nations" in Genesis 10, the list of descendants of Noah that represents the peoples known to the ancient Hebrews. TOGARMAH is among the DESCENDANTS OF JAPHETH and is thought to represent some people located in ANATOLIA. Medieval sources claimed that TOGARMAH was the legendary ancestor of several peoples of the Caucasus (including ARMENIANS and GEORGIANS) as well as several TURKIC PEOPLES.[a]
@@ninjaentrepreneur3578 Slavs originated in the areal of Zarubintsy arch. culture (3 cent.BC - 1 cent. AD in Northern Ukraine and Southern Belarus), where R1a-Z283 and I2-Y3111 were dominant linneages. Of course, Slavs started to migrate to south forest-steppe zone and assimilated some remains of Scythians in the lower Dnieper basin but their number was not high (Scythians were defeated by Sarmatians in 1st century AD in modern-day Ukraine, so most of them migrated to southern steppes where Slavs never inhabited). In 3rd century AD Goths invaded to modern-day Ukraine. In 4-5 th centuries most of Goths, Scythians, Sarmatians (mostly Alans) left southern Ukraine under the Hunnic pressure and moved to the borders of Roman Empire. Most of Scythians migrated to Pannonia and to Balkans. That is why Z93 (commmon for Scythians and Sarmatians) is mostly found among south Slavs (especially in Bulgaria) but almost absent in north (western and eastern) Slavs. Linguistically Slavs have a low % of Scythian and Sarmatian borrowed words (bog - god, sobaka - dog, loshad - horse etc.). As well as all those words have old Slavic synonimic words (divo - god, pes - dog, kon - horse). So Scythians appeared much more earlier than Slavs appeared as ethnic group and Slavs did not originated from Scythians according to DNA and archaeological searches. Zarubintsy arch. culture (ancestors of Slavs) is complicated amalgamation of local south Baltic tribes with migrants from Central Europe (Late La Tene) - ancient Venedi and Bastarnae. Zarubintsy arch. items (fibulae of Celto-Illyrian type, Celto-Germanic type of S-conic plates, black-polished pottery, cremation with remaining bones in urns ("urn fields") show a strong connection with late La Tene (Celtic) culture and differ very much from local Baltic and Scythian cultures.
