I believe the Standard model is incomplete and Pauli Exclusionary Principle can be violated because Superposition and Spooky Action at a Distance is real and it also must Violate E=mc2 and faster than light information communication, Fermi Dirac Distribution Fermi energies, Ultimately implies that the Wave function, Heininberg Uncertainty, Planck's Constant, And the Cosmological constant is incorrect
Fermilab is NOT shut down. We shutdown one of our accelerators, the Tevatron, last fall but we are moving forward into the Intensity Frontier of particle physics. Come visit and see. We're close by!
I've been there twice, once in 1980 and again in 82...I think. I didn't really understand it at the time, but thanks to videos like this I have a much stronger grasp. I'm a fan, keep up the great vids.
After a good deal of trying to understand the Standard Model of quantum physics, this video has explained to me the final bits I needed to get my puzzle solved... This is probably the best (sort of dumbed-down) explanation of the Standard Model I've seen!
Thanks, Fermilab! I've been keeping up since I was a student reading Scientific American. Went there with my husband and his sister, they still talk about it after five years.
Hey! Im 15, and i filled ~50 pages with the information from theese videos! Its interesting! You can learn theese! It's such a wonderful feeling to get a little bit closer to understand, what happens around us, and why does it happen. I especialy like relativity, but i have to rewatch several parts of the videos. But it works! Im learning!
I agree. I struggled with the basics of chemistry for a long time and this has actually solved most of my doubts about charge mass and behavior of different substances.
Thanks Dr. Don.You have no idea how disarming your presentation is. You seem like one of the best spokepersons to explain why we need to keep funding this research. You've convinced me and (btw) I've always hated Theoretical Physics for it's lack of focus, inattention, and utter disregard to simply "building a better mouse trap".
Such a useful video, I’m currently studying particle physics in high school and I was struggling to get my head around the whole idea. Thank you so much!
I never really knew the role of bosons, now I know they're the forces, every video or documentary I watch teaches me something knew or makes me think about something differently than I've done before, thank you fermilab
Thank you for a wonderfully explanatory video. I recall hearing you on the old Milt Rosenberg radio show. How great those programs were. I'm an old Liberal Arts guy who is rediscovering science. As I read and watch each day, I am continually surprised and astonished at the macro and the micro. With Einstein and Quantum Physics, who needs Science Fiction?
Good lord...I did Chem, Bio and Math for A levels and always regretted not doing Physics. Never understood the standard model and the reason why in this age of information is any video I watch starts off with a ten minute history lesson, then they mention the sub atomic particles and then go into quantum mechanics and confuse themselves and me just because they want to say "quantum mechanics". This video is the first I've seen that simply explains it beautifully... Thank you so much!
THANK YOU PROFESSOR LINCOLN...!!! It was like a review for me ...since I have learned first from you and then from others too...!!! Still keep on reviewing to make sure ...and remind myself of the terminology...!!!
Awesome job with the explanation. This is sci comm at its best. Doesn't dumb down anything, gives an honest look at the current situation and uses good analogies to make it easier to the lay viewer.
ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-CGxIDbqRsGY.html The theory of everything | The standard model of particle physics Watch till the end ang share if found informative
5:05 Yeah I was confused about the weak force. Like always physicists brush this off by saying "the weak force is responsible for some type of radioactivity". But now I got it after the new video of fermilab about the weak force and going in details about it.
I really don't understand force by particle exchange. 1. How does attraction work 2. Wouldn't the particle get exhausted by emitting exchange particles, even when the receiving particle is not there, if it only emits the exchange particle when the other particle is there, then how does is come to know about it.
So here's my best explanation. I think it's more helpful to think of the 'particle' as a wave packet. Take the gluon for example. The gluon has a mass/energy nearly as large as a single atom of gold. But when a gluon is bound within a system of quarks, it creates a wave 'trough' or potential energy well. The quarks attract each other because they lie at the lowest energy point of this gluon well. For the quarks to be split apart requires sufficient energy to overcome this gluon potential energy well. And as I mentioned, that energy is huge - comparable to the mass / energy of single gold atom.
It's not force boson fermions or Particle exchange , but Rather all Force particle exsist as a Unifiable Field and it's Fields Vibration or spin is what's we called Force and, It's Orientation is what we call Quarks ,Electron ,proton Photon or basic particle matter building blocks
That's actually one of the best videos about this subject, I don't have a deep knowledge on physics although I have lot o curiosity and interest on it, even with my little knowledge I could understand the main idea behind the concepts and want to learn even more about it!
Excellent presentation! I am reassured that there still some "secrets" to be discovered and questions to be answered (for my grand-children that is). Thank you, Ciao, L
I believe the Standard model is incomplete and Pauli Exclusionary Principle can be violated because Superposition and Spooky Action at a Distance is real and it also must Violate E=mc2 and faster than light information communication, Fermi Dirac Distribution Fermi energies, Ultimately implies that the Wave function, Heininberg Uncertainty, Planck's Constant, And the Cosmological constant is incorrect
Thanks for the video - it helped answer some of my queries on the atomic make up....which has puzzled me during the O.U. course I am doing. Its a good job gravity force is so small - otherwise I would be much heavier - its bad enough now trying to loose weight.
ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-CGxIDbqRsGY.html The theory of everything | The standard model of particle physics Watch till the end ang share if found informative
Break down isnt really the right way of putting it. The weak force can essentially change the flavour (type) of particle, and if it changes from a high energy particle to a lower energy particle then other particles will be created using the left over energy
Edit Don Lincoln (born 1964) is an American physicist, author, host of the RU-vid channel Fermilab, and science communicator. He conducts research in particle physics at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory and is an adjunct professor of physics at the University of Notre Dame.[1] He received a Ph.D. in experimental particle physics from Rice University in 1994. In 1995, he was a codiscoverer of the top quark.[2] He has coauthored hundreds of research papers and, more recently, was a member of the team that discovered the Higgs boson in 2012.[3.....from wikipedia......(sir,, take my salute)
Good stuff !! You explain complicated subjects in a simple way. I "wish" you would do a video on Electromagnetism. I understand the words, "a photon" has two fields, electric field and magnetic field; but I think you could make the concept more intuitive.
I have a few questions 😁 Does gravity affect all sizes of particles? Even Higgs Boson? Am I the only person who believes that there is no end to how “small” or “elemental” something can be?
ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-CGxIDbqRsGY.html The theory of everything | The standard model of particle physics Watch till the end ang share if found informative
Fermilab scientists know what gravity is. It is a partial entanglement phenomenon. It so rare and weak because it is rare entanglements and partial entanglemets to break, well it happens but at very lower rates. partial entanglements are easily to DEGRADE than pure entanglements among only two particles. A partial entanglement of many particles has a lower degrading threshold level, and even the quantum noise level of the void affects it. If we heat something it becomes heavier because we allow partial entanglements degrade at faster rates, but not way faster except in neutron stars, compressed plasma black hole accretion disk etc. Each new partial entanglement degrades at a more stable quantum state, but not all energy is transformed into motion, some is spread out as heat. Of course we have statistically some few pure entanglements, but even them may degrade, but in that case not with an interaction with a field as partially entangled particels or with random low quantum noise of the void, but with moving partially entangled particles or purely entangle particles that crush on the purely entangled one. I want to that Fermilab for explaining what gravity really is!!! these guys have relly TOP iq !!! ok, the Fermigravity or Entanglogravity is one option, we also have chromogravity [MIT about chomatic information shared partially to other particles and not only inside one] but some scientists claim that both theories are the same mathematically entanglogravity is way simpler though [just a different flavour as many claim]
If gravity is a space time bending then at the lowest, smallest measurements, then surely you would understand the direction of the force would be negligible against a space time curve and hence it wouldn't apply. Its like resistance of something massive with huge momentum ignoring gravity. Imagine a bending ruler, then focus in on the centre. The closer you get to it the straighter the edges look. Eventually everything travels in a straight line, always.
joppadoni this is a cool thought but it's based on the premise of a center existing in the first place. space time does not have a center , so the idea of a direction of the force of gravity doesn't exactly exist.
indeed, the deeper you go in to a mass the flatter space time becomes, hence no central point, thats why gravity reduces the further you dig a deep, deep, deep hole in to, say the earth. but i dont think that matters, the distances become so tiny. only in black holes would that curvature become a feature, or rather an effect. i think it is here that the answers will be found to link the two.
I can't wait until I'm far enough into my education to learn and understand the math and experimentation behind subatomic particle physics :D I'M SO EXCITED (and impatient) ...just thought I'd mention that because this video reminded me to be curious and ask questions :)
Just gone back to studying physics and chemistry A-levels, after half a lifetime of art and philosophy:) Am loving it. It's a good change to have right or wrong answers, after so much subjectivity;) This guy has quickly become my 'go to' for great, personable explanations:) thankyou x
I imagine a world where we slowly learn to manipulate and control smaller realms of matter. From chemistry and nano-tech today which harnesses and arranges atoms, to perhaps one day being able to control and manipulate these quarks and other particles, to whatever is inside/hidden under them when we learn to manipulate them. I hope the trail never ends... or stops getting smaller.
Hey Don, a question: I seem to recall that: 1. The Theory of the W-boson is that it is the boson unifying the electro-weak and strong forces, and that... 2. The W-boson Theory also predicts that, phenomenally rarely, protons decay, and that... 3. An experiment in Kameoka, Japan collected together enough protons (in the form of water) in a huge underground pit, such that, statistically, after a few years, they should have detected a proton decay, and that... 4. They did not detect such a proton decay, conceptually disproving the W-boson Theory. Am I remembering all of that (any of that perhaps?) correctly?
Dear Don Lincoln, could you, please, elaborate on how particle exchange can explain the action of forces? For example, it is easy to see the repulsion as it was demonstrated in this video, but how about the attractive forces, how do we explain with particle exchange? Would the boat have to through a sack away from person on the shore? How does particle conservation apply to this context?
I have an important question that's been bugging me. When he explains how bosons serve has particles that bounce between two other particles, the image of the guys playing catch on the shore shows that it pushes them further apart. But it's supposed to be what keeps particles together? I'm trying to wrap my head around how that works
Jovarans Guplar i believe it’s way way more complicated than that, it’s just an overly simplified example, I urge you not to overthink overly simplified examples as it won’t really help
Wow always great to revisit, wow is it that long. Thanks Dr Don and the Fermilab-YT-Team, every video is an honour to see, educational and entertaining. Will a Lepto-Quark be found ever? :-) NEAL
so the higgs boson gives particles mass, but isn't that what gravity does? could higgs and gravitons be the same thing? I've always seen gravity demonstrated as a bowling ball on a mattress causing marbles to fall into its depression, so is the mattress in that example representing the higgs field?
Sir I have a question.i think gravity is weakest force because it may be using other particles to emit gravity or gravitational waves just like conductor or inductor concept is it possible?
Concise. Is the planetary model thingy an appropriate time to mention Rutherford and Bohrs' conceptions (prior knowledge)? At least until 1987?, undergraduate chemistry, physics courses did not mention the SM; and it, of course, made it into no hs texts. Why not?
DOUBTS 1)so can i safey say that an electron is made up of 3 down quarks as then only the net resultant charge will be -1 2)and also how do we derive the charge of the quark is there a formula or is it completely hit and trial 3)can we split quarks like normal atoms with processes like fission and fusion at the quark level 4)how do the neutrinos remember their origin is there any explanationto that 5)can there be only 3 up quarks or will that just be 2 protons 6) please name combinations with other 4 types and do they have a charge
In Kenneth W. Ford's "101 Quantum Questions", 2011, p.186, he said " A particle acts as a particle when it is created and annihilated(emitted and absorbed) and acts as a wave in between......we just have to give up the idea that a photon is a particle at any moment other than the moments of its birth and death". For Muon, Tau, Lambda, Sigma,Omega, Pion , Eta and kaon, etc., this moment of birth and death is extremely short : from 10^-6 second to 10^-20 second. So, should it be a Standard Model of particle physics or a Standard Model of wave physics ?
You are great personality of world physics You are in correct directions Universe is physical world and its Measurements No God No soul Astrology is cultural heritage Astrology is non scientific God is moral ethics
Should the quarks, leptons, boson and forces be considered as making up all there is? As in, should they be considered as exhaustively being the building blocks of all reality?
Forces are really the exchange of particles? Does that mean forces are quantized and not continuous? If you block the force particles then the force disappears? What is the rate of exchange of force particles? Does a subatomic particle have an infinite number of force particles available to "emit" and how could that be possible?
