📌The T-14 Armata Vs Abrams X! | War Tycoon Today I will be showing you which is the better tank! The new t-14 or the abrams x gamepass! 📝HASHTAGS #roblox #wartycoon #2024
Let me know if you watched the video until the end if you would like to see more long videos like this! Soon im planning to expand on my content and I wanna do challenges but also longer detailed guides!
the T-14 doing less damage isn’t confusing, basically the T-14 has the 2A82 cannon, which is basically just a 2A46 gun, both fire shitty APFSDS being able to penetrate about 500 millimeters of armor, compared to the M829A2 APFSDS fired by the M1 Abrams’ 120mm M256 L/44 gun can penetrate around 660 millimeters of steel, so it is statistically correct for the AbramsX to dish out more damage. Edit: Also, the AbramsX is pay to win compared to the T-14 so the devs purposely make it better, also the T-14 is absolute garbage in reality.
Tbh as someone who is 70% p2w (ownership of abx, fal heavy, and ww2 pack) I personally think it’s stupid that paid options are dead best. I think the p2w options are so overpowered that they put the player using it up a whole level. For example. I think the average abx user (not considered to be badly skilled or highly skilled) is on the same level as a highly skilled or good player, who’s playing in the T-14 or any of the other MBTs. A bad player using the abx would be on the same level as an average player. Same thing goes for all the other p2w vehicles and gear. This is absolutely bonkers. I understand that the devs want to make money, so they make paid options the best so more people will buy them. But in a game like this where most of the missions to get different vehicles are long, tedious and difficult at times is more than enough reason to buy a paid vehicle. I think there should be a free to play vehicle in every category, that is on par with the paid option. Although it should be the most difficult to unlock. Another thing that would be fine is if paid options just had an extra unique abilities. For example: if the f35 was the same in terms of performance to the harrier but in addition it has the ability to drop bombs. That would still make the f35 better, since it is the only plane that can hover and drop bombs and honestly deal with ground targets the easiest. It would be plenty of reason to buy it. And since you don’t have to make the long grind of level 30 to unlock it, it’s still a good choice for those who don’t want to go through that grind. This way paid options are technically still the “best” but there is a free alternative options that free to play players can use with immense effort put into the game to grind for it. This way players aren’t discouraged to pvp. Because sometimes it really does feel hopeless when a decent p2w player enters the lobbby.
You know, the VCAC and BTR-80 are both just like the M3 Bradley, how?, Well, firstly, BTR-80 has a 30mm explosive cannon and a machine gun, just like the Bradley, and VCAC has wire guided missiles, just like the Bradley, so really, the Bradley is just VCAC and BTR-80 combined, really the only difference is that the BTR-80 is amphibious (at least it will be in the future) and VCAC has more wire guided missiles, so yeah.
Você usou que tipo de maconha? Não tem nada a ver, BTR E VCAC e M3 e uma coisa totalmente diferente é Outra inclusive aonde as rodas aparecem? Na lua? Sem conta oque o BTR será anfíbio eo VCAC eu carro anti tank leve Que é movido sobre rodas e apenas possuem as mesma arma do M3 Bradley eo Adtas a diferença é que a do VCAC é feita pra tanks
2:23 the shell size does not always matter, statistically tanks do not have health bars in the real world and other stuff affects damage such as the length of the barrel which can improve the velocity of the shell and the type of shell American shells being better than the Russian equivalent here
2:10 the size of the gun has nothing to do with the damage it’s the velocity of the shell, 3:38 it does more damage shooting in the side, that’s why you t-14 was faster in that situation 5:30 the t-14 has explosive reactive armor which has no advantage over Normal shells, only high explosive shells, which is the kind of round the rpg uses 8:00 bro really hit the barrel💀💀💀 he’d have won by a lot if he were to hit a better spot
The weapon caliber is not the only factor, there’s speed of shell, density of shell, penetrating power, velocity, etc Am still confused why it has an explosive machine gun to this day ITS A MAGAZINE NOT A CLIP (technically it’s the barrel overheating cause no reload animation) T-14 def protected by Stalinium Yeah basically no tank is surviving a Javelin to the roof, the armour is to thin and the Javelin has to much penetrating power Ok bu bai am sticking with the Abrams X I still haven’t unlocked T-14 lmao
2:15 the cannons do have a difference in size but that doesnt necessarily mean that bigger = more damage, as irl most (if not all) modern tanks use APSD rounds which are basically smaller rods than the diameter of the barrel and use a sabot to keep the pressure behind the round, ps i dunno if 5mm gonna make that much off a difference (thats what she said 💀)
yeah I agree with that, heres the thing, I would have mentioned that in the video itself but it was already gonna be long and least according to how war tycoon does it they do more damage based on the size in most instances
While they both shoot apfsds shells 5mm means they can fit more powder behind The shell, they can also fire a bigger dart which should create more spall
T-90A and the T-72A both use the 2A46M gun, albeit different versions (2A46M-1, 2A46M-4, 2A46, 2A46-2, blah blah) but the T-14 uses the 2A82 gun, and in-game the guns do different amounts of damage
T14 takes more damage to rpg etc on the sides its more durable at the front on the sides it takes 4 rpg shots on the side for abramsX it takes 5 rpg shots I think they might of slightly buffed the abramsX
Yeah But its important to test damage for the same place plus people mostly go for front hits. Either way I think abrams got slightly buffed, in fact all tanks did and ill make a video on that soon
little correction: explosive machine gun on the abramsX does NOT fire faster than the t-14. the abramsX has a slow explosive machine gun and also a normal machine gun. while the t-14 has a fast explosive machine but none with normal bullets
@MoazRBLX thanks for pointing that out but even the e turret on t14 is slower then normal bullets and the abrams x has medium e bullets and fast normal bullets so I think that's why I said that but I phrased it wrong and it's a very small speed difference(like 0.3 seconds) between the t14 and abrams x so I still think abrams x takes that point
Hi bro, excellent video, keep it up, but, in the last video I asked you if there was a new code, to which you replied yes, could you tell me what the code is? Thank you :)
abrams x deals more damage, has a better APFSDS shell than both of them, has an explosive machine gun with stupid DPM and includes a javelin, although the T-90A does have a great passive and good main gun DPM, it doesn't beat the abrams X besides it's reload, albeit the T-90A having I think the fastest reload in the game for a tank, although that needs confirmation, but other than that it has the same hp, worse DPS on both the machine guns and main gun, and lacks a javelin.
Would u rather have a tank with explosive guns (no addition other bullets) that have normal 125mm ammo OR a tank with a XM360 120m with a explosive gun that also fires additional other bullets and a javelin?
??, all you did here was some fancy wording, XM360 being the name of the 120mm gun of the abrams X, and you can make the T-14 also look as good as the abrams by saying or a tank that has a 2A82-1M smoothbore 125mm gun with an automatic remote controlled explosive machine gun. The difference in damage is simply because of the difference in the APFSDS shells that they have, they both use APFSDS, but unsurprisingly the one that costs 1500 robux deals more damage, now of course the Abrams X is better because of its higher DPS, more DPM when it comes to the explosive machine gun, and its inclusion of a javelin will of course make the abrams better.
@@Guygotphonecall I'd love to see a source saying that the XM360 is a shell, because all sources I've seen are saying that the XM360 is a light-weight 120mm gun, and yes the fancy wording does stand for something, the non-fancy wording of what you said. What you basically said was: Would you want to have a tank with a 30mm explosive autocannon with a 125mm smoothbore that fires APFSDS, OR a tank that has a 30mm explosive autocannon with generally better shells than the Armata's 30mm, with a 120mm cannon that also fires APFSDS, and a javelin equipped.
@@Guygotphonecall I am not denying the fact that the Abrams X is (blatantly) better than the Armata, because it is! But what I'm saying is that you used some fancy wording to make the other tank look better when they virtually have the same features but one with amplified performance (better performance) and the addition of a javelin and the other having the same thing except its lacking a bit of DPS, DPM and a javelin.
I think the biggest advantage that the abx has over the armata is blowout panels, like 99% of time abx users are absolute dogshit but even if you destroy their tank they just jump out and finish you off with an rpg, it's super annoying.
*Devs trying to be realistic so they decide to make T-14 more durable to be real life accurate* and then fucking up in numbers and making 120mm stronger than 125mm
ngl they should buff the t14 or nerf the x with the javelin am playin both but only bcs of the javelin the abramsx has soooo many advantegets over every other tank like it makes more damage but the most annoying part is that the abramsx can locate u with that stupid thing and is instand battle ready while u just chill, and 2 secs later ur dead bcs you have not even seen him or for me the most annoying part in the game is that when western tanks blow up, they dot blow up. i know that the tanks burn out in real life and dont make boom but why the hell do u surive that hell inside an abramsx when ur tank died ?!?! while when ur in an russian tank u instandly die my oppinion is that u should die in both vehicles when ur tank dies
well the abram x has more damage than the armata even tho the armata has a larger caliber due to the tank shell that was fired from the cannon, because lets be real t-14 irl is prob some propaganda that its stronger than even the abrams [like the shell could be KE, or something from the future since it isn´t developed yet] + yeah the fact that a tank from future can be beaten by a tank that can´t even compare to the leopard 2a7
yeah I agree it could be propaganda, at the end of the day reason why i was surprised with stronger abrams cannon was also because on average in this game they base damage on size
actual shell fired: shell velocity: a bunch of other statistics that go into how much damage a cannon should do: this guy: "125mm bigger than 120mm, more damage 🤓☝" like, no true offense meant but that's kind of dumb to think that's how it works
I dont think thats how it works, im basing what I say on past things developers do and they seem to on average follow the pattern on bigger the size the stronger the shot
@@LordBloxxxxxx im sure it's taken into account, it's just not something they display, why else would a T-72 (keep in mind that thing is from the early cold war), that has the same caliber as a T-90, do far less damage ? because the shell fired is a lot weaker, the gun and ammo are older, etc.
How is it realistic the t14 in the game don’t even have rocket that can disrupt javelin ,how ever IRL it has the system that can disrupt javelin or any anti-tank guided missiles🙄🙄🙄
I don’t think you know what you’re talking about. It’s called APS not “rocket” and it can’t shoot javelins down only deploy smoke grenades to hide it from the javelin.
@@cherylmark7 so you mean the explosive autocannon on the top of the vehicle? if so the abrams x's autoloader is significantly faster than the armata's one
Make maus realistic? Let it be it already balance to me, if it going to be realistic then its gonna be much slower also modern tank can penetrate it easily since you want it realistic
