The Thing: From 1982 to 2011 

I couldn't agree more. I was recommended this movie ('82) a while back and it was a Friday night and every Friday we have takeaways and so as I'm eating and watching the movie, the dog scene comes and I just had to stop the movie and run outside for a cigarette because I could feel everything in my stomach just coming back up. 😭

1982 is best

scromit

I did that both once, vomits first then screamin "WTF". That's the first and the last time i ever saw the 1982 movie

I'd say that's accurate.

One of my all time favorite movies. 🤩

they planned practical effects in 2011 film

@@daegnaxqelil2733 they didn't just planned. They actually did all these scenes with practical effects, grimm, and animatronics just like in the original movie. They even filmed them in this way. You can find btc footage of making practical effects. It looks really cool and much better and scarier then they did it in final cut with CGI.

@@protos9877 sight" Hollywood and their toxic CGI policy

The fake looking CGI crap doesn't hold a candle to the 1982 effects.

Yup

Obviously

ONN MEEEE Dude i hella jumped!!!!!!! 🤣🤣🤣

@@ryansmart38 😂😂😂me too 😅

ALIENWARE

Lmao😂

Reminds me of south Park

Inspired by the book but yes to put it together and visualize it fucking nuts

Its an adaptation and a remake of The Thing From Anither World (1951)

​@@le_meme_man8983no it's literally not lmaoo

​​@@gigachad167 yes it literally is lmaoo

"You are sense of imagination"?

Well, it's also that every cell of The Thing is an individual, thinking organism, so the only way to put it down permanently is to destroy every cell beyond repair, but I get what you're saying.

Ну ещё кислота, жидкий азот, карозийный газ, сильная радиация.🤗✨

@@wd3185 yup i really scare when i see the blood test. So dangerous

True, which is why it always frustrated me to see them use the fire extinguisher. C'mon let that thing burn!!!

Or a very corrosive acid

Yup lol u kno it!!!!!

No.1 way to solve alien invasions and most importantly, the homeless crisis.

​@@SirEpifirelmao

you gota beee fuucking kiiding

😮😲😲😭😳😳😳😳

Хорошо прожаренная, пальчики оближешь 😋

Scary

Yes! Man you can hear the heartbreaking when the flames hit the animations, it is a masterpiece

3:04

@@pupsik_99 that’s more of a “when you see a fire rampaging throughout the halls and you and your friends are surviving like Minecraft”

Lmao 😂😂

@@bossshun9 lol

Agreed- I like both. Mary Elizabeth Winstead and Lars totally carried the 2nd one. It was also too much of a copy.

82 version is overrated. It was never about "the thing" it was about the plot, the reason why you think the older is better is because the plot will always be linear, and the second time isn't as impactful as the first.

@@Nobody-su9kmits obvious you’re into fitness

@@Nobody-su9kmnah you don’t even know what overrated means

@@TheSoCalledZoner1 it's self explanatory dude OVER RATED...

Yeah. It all looks and feels more organic.

Yeah it has a much better atmosphere and sense of dread and paranoia. But the 2011 prequel isn't bad, questionable CGI aside.

Practical effects always beat CGI

My country's TV station once played the '82 movie at midnight uncensored when i was a kid, i didn't sleep that night

AMONG US IS BETTER

I am pretty sure u like alot stuff about head

I thought it was funny when it thought it wouldn't be caught 'walking' away

if it didn't gawk at them it could've escaped.

The head: Rough day guys 😂

"hey there"

Yeah as much as we like to harp on the CGI it is conceptually one of the most horrifying and slow deaths in either movie.

Si capisce anche dal primo film, in una delle scene finali, quando il professore fonde la sua mano con il volto di quell'altro tizio

Jessica email address

Was it a prequel??

It was too rushed

@@vilmoskapitany9813 idk

@@vilmoskapitany9813 Yes

True

The Fly too

And Predator. Alien, Aliens, Predator and The Thing are my favorite films of all time.

The blob too

That was almost six years before the Bite of 87 happened in an abandoned restaurant full of animatronic mascots who became possessed by the spirits of the missing children who were murdered in that very place.

Bruh, I’d rather run into Fnaf animatronics then the The Thing lmao 🤣

@@thegermanempire489 bro I'd rather get into assimilated by the thing than being a animatronic for a possessed mascots

For me its nightmare too

​@@thatexitsignuser nope i'd rather get springlock than facing my nightmare fuel the thing

Body horror....

Thats what im saying when i first saw it, it actually scared me, ive havent been scared in a while

I agree, you can love the original and not shit on the newer one. That fusion scene really fucked me up. He went from being saveable to no hope with the face fusion.

​@@Trill104looked like a goofy cartoon to me man that shit was bad cgi at its finest, ESPECIALLY IF YOU COMPARE IT TO THE PRACTICAL EFFECT DELECTED VERSION OF THE SAME SCENE

I honestly feel that combining practical effects and CGI is the best way to go (2004's Spider-Man 2 movie is a good example). But I agree that the 2011 movie (The Thing) going full CGI did not do it justice.

The 2011 version wasn't supposed to use CGI either, they had all the animatronics, a lot of scenes already shot with them but it was decided (By some moron for sure) that it all needs to be scrapped and reshot/redone in post to replace all the practical effects with this shit CGI. Recommend going and watch the behind the scenes of the 2011 version, there is a lot of material with all the stuff they were supposed to originally use there. Big shame.

Practical effects are the best... period.

82 will hold its own forever

Rob Bottin forever a genius

2011 was the prequel

I like that he does the weird shaking thing

What's T2?

@@Fliko98 terminator 2, epic film!

No alien or aliens? Check those movies out man as fan of predator movies check out the alien movies as well.

Don't forget Alien and Aliens!

It is. When I saw it aged 11 in 1984 I thought it was incredible. Now I think it's one of the best films ever made, along with Alien, Aliens, Predator and Terminator. My 15 year old son just watched these, and he thought they were fantastic too. We watched The Thing in 4K on a big TV with surround sound and he was on the edge of his seat the whole time. Cinema evolves, of course, but it is sad to think that movies like that will never get made again. The use of labour of love physical effects, the superb cinematography with wide anamorphic lenses, the slower editing, the woke free casting and storylines... that era's gone. Sad.

Beautiful moment 🙂

Yeah literally

Just to think of all the beatiful practical effects we were gonna get for the Prequel, sure the characters are a bunch of idiots and it would still be a generic shitty monster flick, but a one with good effects at least

Не найдут ответ, это не ответ на вопрос, почему ты ненавидишь компьютерную графику

Cause you love overgored things that barely move and are clumsy as hell? Lmao. The thing in 82 was so slow and useless that i find it comical how people died to it.

​@@Nobody-su9kmtypical response of a zoomer with the attention span of a fly

blah blah blah, we get it, you are old.@@BesoffenerIslamist

2011 is not a version, it's a prequel

@Dislike2011 I'm aware...I also noted the following " ...before the original for the storyline." It's called reading between the lines...even without saying the word prequel, I still mentioned the word "storyline ". 🍪

I first watched it when I was 11 😟

the 2011 had a lot of practical effects but universal studios made the director scrap all the practical effects

@@banan3467 that's so unfortunate :(

but how would you follow them up? being serious here... my guess would have a rescue team shows up after months of no contact with either team and more "Things" are found deep in the ice. but thats as far as i got.

@@GladDestronger yeah exactly that’s a good way to go or start

There was a videogame sequel to the 1982 one

@@fnvfan0145 wait what really 😱😱😱

@@alonzobonilla yeah it was released early 2000's I believe, takes place shortly after the movie ended.

Nah they would ruin it

Personaly i think the more modern the cgi the worse it looks

in dunno havr your seen cgi lately. thanks tobmarvel thebquality has gone done cause the deadlines are toonshort

@@Burningwhisky96 Sometimes CGI can be really good though, like Pirates of the Caribbean's Davy Jones or MCU's Thanos.

Somehow they would ruin it with the most awful and most embarrassing cgi

I'd probably go with the death angels. Fast af

@@rafayg7376 id say the Thin because as soon as you touch it it will begin to assimilate you and Death angels have a knack for impaling their victims as well

The thing would win

Du xjdho

@@ballandoye9941 WHAT

Prequel, not remake

Agreed. I prefer 82 but it's easy to tell what's a genuine criticism vs nostalgia when people don't even mention 82's flaws. I mean, the Blair monster was lame and a let down for a final creature.

​@@marsha-madness-super-badnessIt's pretty clear that it's just nostalgia when people only mention the practical effects and nothing else, they completely ignore the acting and direction which were what really made the film so scary, the truth is they just want an excuse to criticize the new

It can imitate teeth. It can't imitate metal fillings placed in teeth or any inorganic materials.

Sorry this is such a long reply, I kinda went into a rant, but I feel I tried to at least somewhat explain my feelings on it. Yes the 2011 one is a prequel. And I agree, not a bad movie. It’s main issue stems from how most of what it does is derivative of the original and it’s effects are pretty lackluster. Most of the transformations and effects are done with CGI and just don’t hold up well. Specifically the guy on the helicopter whose face opens up and a bunch of twizzler lookin things fly out of his chest. Or the two guys that fuse together to become the thing they find at the beginning of the original movie. That creature known as “split-face” was originally going to be created with practical effects (which you can find test footage of on Amalgamated Dynamics RU-vid channel) and looked damn good. However, Universal Studios didn’t think people would want to see practical effects, so they told Amalgamted Dynamics to replace it all with CG. So a lot of it looks rushed and just plain goofy. That whole scene at the end of the movie where Kate is exploring the ship and finds that “reactor core” thing made of tetris blocks just looks stupid, not to mention the weird worm thing that assimilated her boss and just had his face on it still even though it doesn’t need to hide at that point. Even that creature was supposed to look far different and more legitimately creepy, but again, they were forced to change it for Universal.

@@schawangusimo the sander thing in the spaceship looked cool but it looked goofy when it had sander’s face.

Many peoole hated the CGI, me included. The CGI didn't aged well contrast to the practical effects that the 1982 film used.

Cause they are boomers

​@@shamsielshahar12082 effects were clumsy as hell lmao, it is really poor honestly, overrated and overgored

Shot by a research assistant working in an antarctic cabin, and sitting in a helicopter a mile away. Not by some sniper in the army

Yeah but they look cool

😋😋😋😋, that movie was delicious 😋.

Это нечто?

thx for the hint,gonna watch this now :)

@@knosel3704 From beyond is a cult classic. Check out The Re-Animater while you're at it.