The Third Industrial Revolution: A Radical New Sharing Economy 

God bless u!!!

I'm 66, & I reckon you've been practiceing this, like me, for most of your life. Your life experiences, are familiar to me, via my parents & their parents, along with most of the folks I've known in my life. Well done you, for getting ahead of the curve, unconsciously, and being sensable enough to have some measure of foresight & acting on it. 👍👌😊🙏

We got this 🤝

@Chuck Manson wow to go. You have lived long enough to see the start of the change. Keep going

Its now the fourth industrial revolution.

Big Knowledge and it has only just started Will it outpace our ability to absorb it? Do we have enough intelligence not to fight it? Or shall we fall back to greed and destroy That which we have created....

@@steveepic5957 There is no fourth industrial revolution higheredstrategy.com/there-is-no-fourth-industrial-revolution/

@@dominicsnow4164 Me too mate. I think the part he missed was batteries. And with elon musk announcing vehicle to grid we are looking at storage for energy meaning renewable energy is a viable option. You can sell power during peak times thus making money. The new battery coming can be made with out drying out the lithium reducing time on production and I'm told this dry process increases battery efficiency by 30 percent. This is achieved by reducing heat generated during energy transfer.

To add to the point a little more. If we flatten the peak energy demand by supply more power it will help lower the power price cause you don't have coal/gas power plants producing energy during peak times. This is the reason why our power is expensive. Something ya'll probably already know. :)

This kind of people are dangerous! Because they motto is: do what is day, dont do what i do! He and his best friends are the parasite of modern tines!

Humans "steering the course" is why we are in this situation. I've heard this same speech for decades.

Perhaps it is an add God-universe-heart-earth devine

you got brainwashed for free idiot

@@juanshaftpatel7488 and you paid to be, IDIOT.

@@earthdaddy we get it... youre poor... probably blk too

Marxist of modern time

Nonexistent money.

the financialization of the economy high GDP, high inequality.

James, who backed many of those subprime loans?.... it was International companies that had locks in the subprime derivatives...many of those companies were oil based .."The recession caused demand for energy to shrink in late 2008, with oil prices collapsing from the July 2008 high of $147 to a December 2008 low of $32. However, it has been disputed that the laws of supply and demand of oil could have been responsible for an almost 80% drop in the oil price within a 6-month period." www.resilience.org/stories/2009-12-08/was-volatility-price-oil-cause-2008-financial-crisis/

@@xxpistolero420xx7 High inequality can have many origins. But the largest (at least in the first world countries) is that a vast majority of humans are just lazy and/or stupid, and their time and effort aren't worth very much.

The banks artifically increase housing prices to get a higher return on their mortgages. They created the housing bubble, the rising oil prices popped the bubble as people couldn't sustain the mortgage payments during an economic crisis.

Socialist..

@@NewLifeFromTheWayofTruth Such a typical, uneducated response. I dare you to elaborate on that and substantiate your enlightened view. I'm going to go out on a limb and guess you have no idea what you're referencing, nor do you have anything to offer, other than criticism. Prove me wrong 🤞🏼

@@NewLifeFromTheWayofTruth you will own nothing and you will be happy [or be killed] -Elites And by the way.. who doesn’t want cars and wants to ride share instead?? Really?! 😂 not me

@@NewLifeFromTheWayofTruthjj😅

@@stephenboyd6230gyaftdffh dX red dr gdsft 51:08 f

We can't ignore change might as well understand it and accept it as our world changes everyday.

#Deep

yes so end marxist programming

It's new form of Utopia and only fools buy it

K Taruc I gave you that 200th like enjoy!!!!

Buddha - 'There is no problem'

i have watched half an hour and decided to stop, and it is fair to say that he didnt really go down the COMMUNISM rabbit hole, and the economic theories he referenced to were not from Karl Marx. Trouble is none of claims he is making really dove into depth of anything. He may have taken a couple economics classes. He proposed obvious solutions to outsiders. The only original so far is the one about aggregate efficiency, and, any undergraduate economics major student would tell you that his association of the thermodynamics coefficient in physics with economic growth is incredibly bizarre.

30 minutes was all I could take too. I feel sorry for those who HAD to attend because at least I can turn this off. Hes the kinda guy that thinks monetizing debt was a good thing I'm thinking.

I'm certainly not equally qualified, but that's the fallacy of authority, so here we go: He mentions that Adam Smith's invisible hand is an adaptation of Newton's that 'every action has an equal and opposite reaction'. However the invisible hand says that pursuing your own personal benefit leads to others benefiting as well. Since both parties are benefiting, it would be hard to describe this as an 'opposite' reaction. And the invisible hand is never said to be equal in any way. So this comparison doesn't hold up to any scrutiny. Not to mention, the insinuation that the last 300 years of economists have just been parroting this notion and have never tested/analyzed/studied this concept of the invisible hand, is absurd. It is a well founded principle of economics and can be easily seen theoretically, empirically, and even anecdotally. Not to mention he invoke's the invisible hand later in the talk. One more point on Adam Smith. He mentions young people tend to give things out for free on the internet, and as such are not acting out of self-interest, and thus must have never read Adam Smith. Despite the fact that giving away things for 'free', such as posting music on youtube, leads to donations, ad money, notoriety, attendance to (paid) shows, status...etc, is the invisible hand at work. Ignoring this, the speaker clearly hasn't read Smith's first book, which talks extensively about altruism. He talks about oil prices and their connection with the financial crisis of 2008. The connection is never really explained beyond the classic fallacy of correlation and causation. Oil prices did indeed rise in 2008, and the economy did indeed collapse in 2008, but is this relationship causal? The general consensus is that it is related to the housing bubble in the US, and not global oil prices (and the speaker even references the housing bubble later in the talk). But, let us not appeal to consensus and instead think of counterpoints. If the collapse was due to oil prices, one would expect all countries dependent on oil to collapse at the same time. What actually happened was that the US collapsed, then the countries most closely economically tied to the US (the EU) collapsed, then the others. Secondly, there is no magical number where oil prices stop the market. Instead, as the price of oil goes up, the costs of oil related products goes up (and the speaker thinks that most the economy is oil related products), and profit margins and productivity go down. This was not the case in pre 2008 economy, which was soaring and oil prices were going up. One of his main points of interest was the zero marginal rate. This may seem like a trivial point, but he clearly states that we can see activities today that have near-zero marginal rates. However, he then goes on to discuss zero marginal rate implications. Near-zero and zero are very different things. Activities with lower marginal rates are important and interesting, but discussing them as though they have zero marginal rates is deceptive and wrong. He talks about ride sharing in the context of reducing pollution from cars. He mentions that cars spend most of their life sitting in parking lots and driveways. The insinuation is that this down time could be employed by someone else, and thus we would need less cars in the world. This is true, and likely to happen in the near future, but it has very little to do with pollution. The total miles driven by people collectively is the same, they just do it with less cars. Put differently, a car sitting in a parking lot or driveway isn't polluting anything. I only got about half way through, and these are just some things that stuck out to me. He does make some good points about technology trends and where the near future may lie. I didn't mention anything political above, but his political insinuations and recommendations are troubling at best.

I stole all the replies to paste to reply to another fan boy on this page. The speaker has an appetite for sensationalism and/or has self-grandizing tendencies with minimal understanding. How is he speaking for VICE? His agent got him the job? Just goes to show that VICE is not interested in putting out content that are true, but only those that fit their narrative, but I think it may still be one of the better media orgranizations by comparison.

I got fed up right away with the "Global warming" Narrative. Most Scientists worth their salt know there is no Confirmed Science when it comes to climate. They merely come up with some numbers feed it into a machine to get the result theyre looking for then they tout it as Science. Then they want to convert those numbers and use it to apply carbon taxes to industries and countries they feel are the biggest offenders (have the most money) to extort money for the globalist agenda. Its all part of the "Top down bottom up." The REAL Science is we are going into a "Polar magnetic shift/flip" and a "Solar minimum" at the same time (which is widely known by those who actually study this) which is causing/and going to cause lots of unusual weather and earthquakes famine floods etc...Just google it to get a general idea. The sad thing is it has nothing to do with anything manmade and there is absolutely nothing we can do to stop it. Of course THEY know this and are just waiting to say "See we told you this would happen." but it wont matter by then anyway. Ask anyone who believes in "The Big Bang theory" this "Can you show me where the center from where all this mass spread from, and where its going?" They will just look at you and shrug.The truth is there is much we do not know "Thats the truth" we are just finding out the universe is Electric,and Dark matter doesnt exist this all just happened in the past 2 years. Science is constantly re evaluating and thats a good thing.

Lol yup!!!!! Lithium stock is gonna boom

yre right

You’re right, so much Green Tech ain’t Green…

Everything people do will result in waste. Whats most important is reducing emissions to have a stable climate.

because they're too busy making youtube videos

Why are they deliberately dividing us into racial and gender factions?

nature rarely works that way. most species have a balance of working together and competing against each other.

Just keep in mind that the USA has a lot of citizens who are too stupid and lazy. US citizen's idea of social consciousness is the " poor me " movement, not about what they can do for their country.

@@tuckerbugeater the gender debate here? You serious?

@@tuckerbugeater Same reason they always have.Keep us busy fighting each other over crumbs so we don't unite to fight them for the whole pie! Turn of the previous century robber-baron J. Gould was quoted as saying "I could easily hire one half of the poor to murder the other half !"

LOL Patience Space Ghost, it will if not already. It took about a month for it to find me...

3years it's showed itself, but i probably just looked past it. Its a good second watch, and i haven't stopped research along the way. I can't help but think fantastic with a big but. The share concept is a promise from the master's 'you will own nothing and be happy' plus i need to pull the toy apart and give it to my sister. The next big work thing.. are we slaves, or cyborgs or what? I've seen similar footage with out any human beings. The truck train, are they part of the iot doing that analysis? How do they connected to it? The food and community agriculture is the way it should be, they are going hard to distroy this. Are they using the generation at hand and inspiring them to run with this and push on social media, marketing content. He carefully withholds some information with ease. Are we all being used to bring about this World Order? Are they going to use to there advantage and manipulate the very people who think and speak up. I hope not.

I'm so happy for taking the bold step in working and investing $2000 with Expert Mrs Elizabeth Donald's after a week I received $19,680 to my bank

Here in Canada Expert Mrs Elizabeth Donald's carries out the both orientation and mentorship potentials

@@augustusgrey6549 Is her trading service in Europe ?

@@alexandrathompson5213 There is really no country restriction in her company,,,I’m investing with her from Switzerland

What surprises me about her mostly is she gives her client's access to her trading site whereby they can monitor their trades on daily basis

Let the brainwashing commence

Watching again in 2024, 6 years later. I'm no longer impressed. The guy is an illusionist. He is setting people up for the NWO and 2030 Great Reset with draconian implications for society.

Are you stunned?

😂

watch event 201 you will be thrilled in another way as to how youve been scammed and sucked in! wise up and educate yourself in all respect.

@@ladygrace2741 y yee try Rufus frustrating

So you mean corporations

Thats right - Millenials - give up your entire life and generation to ensure that the Boomers can go on living the last of their rich existance, fix all their problems, and create the new world for your kids and the next generation - thats all you have to do!

@@scorch4299conspicuous that people who live this life dont have kids. they’ll technologically outsource that too if they get the chance. already in blueprint

kudz Pakaipa just prevent your leaders from selling out your people....if you can

@Tamera Bonner 3:53, but where are the Māori?

As another commenter said imagine taking pointers in morality from someone employed by the CCP and the EU

Was it the part where he claimed the earth is 450 billion years old?😂 He makes an astonishing amount of false claims.

Blind and brainwashed

@@felipefuentes4811 potentially, please expand....

What a moron! Learn to think for yourself!

Trust me, your IQ is still fucked

my IQ is 99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 after the video. i am now a true intellectual

Stop the Crime- Wow, hmmm. I didn't notice that here. Please enlighten me, what human rights are these ideas taking away? The right to pollute? The right to hoard and not share? The right for my country to subsidize dying, damaging industries while the rest of the world seizes the future?

Now it is Agenda 2030 and it is much worse. No way to escape it, these Millenials are about to see hell on earth unleashed that will make WWII seem like a schoolyard quarrel. I've never seen a more unthinking, blindly lead generation of tide pod eating, soy latte drinking, smartphone addicted, autistic, gender confused idiots. Wake the Hell up. Start researching and listening to other ideas, you are not predisposed to believe.

you're insane

it seems like he has some errors in his analogies about entropy but you might find that out some day :-) Chapter 2: The Science of Productivity 20:56 there is clearly some agenda being pushed here

remaining 200 million cars...hmm thats either a very wrong guess or its very telling of what to expect.

If it took us 60 years to build our outdated electricity grid. Then, it will only take us less than 20 years to build a fully digitize energy system infrastructure. Some European nations have already accomplished about 30% to 40% in building such infrastructure and moving fully towards renewable energy, which will be eventually near zero cost to produce, and allowing to share the needed available resources, which will help eliminate waist & pollution, and it will improve everyone’s life and improve the eco-system, and to be able to grow only organic agricultural products free of contaminations & viruses.

Me too. I was planning on just watching a few minutes to see what it was about. Now here I still am almost 2 hours later. He's got some really good ideas.

believe.Each travel starts with a step ....

@@rrboustani pls provide sources to your claims.

this is all BS propaganda, when the government says they are investing aa trillion dollars to prevent somekind of disaster and goldman sachs is on board its just another manufactured emergency they can use to grant themselves more power and authority. The government will never spend time on solving a problem if the problem doesnt create a bigger one or if the solution doesnt involve giving themselves more power or money to spend.

What about the one that gos like this=manipulated info???????

That's deep ,but how did it take so much time to get us to know too From India

This was released in 2017.

You are completely right. I hope that will slowly change. Web3.0 technology and decentralized protocols you find in the crypto sphere can probably help to solve this.

@Gottfried Lieber A public option is great imo. "Medicine for All" by Dana Brown proposes such an option for Pharmaceuticals.

Blockchain ❤️

Because those models are tied to 2nd Industrial revolution infrastructure. Did you watch the whole thing?

@Dean Turner 2nd industrial revolution infrastructure includes monopolies. The 3rd revolution has its strength in being truly de-cenralised.

Uber and AirBnb are still centralized sources that control the sharing economy. They are not part of the decentralized third industrial revolution being talked about in this video. Imagine an application that is open source, written with smart contracts that execute if and only if someone generates a payment through this application to someone else. The smart contract always executes upon the initial transaction on the blockchain and it is written in such a way that once the person generating the payment is taken from point A to point B on the GPS, they are paid automatically. The validation and governance of the transaction, the output of the smart contract, and the releasing of the payments all happens by validators on chain, and every user of the service is a participant in the validation. There are no middle men, no Uber and AirBnb controlling anything, and no one taking a cut in the middle. Purely decentralizee ride sharing in a nutshell.

@Dean Turner You think there's ever been real communism on this planet, yet calling others gullible..., now THAT's funny! Watch Star Trek and then open "The Capital", you'll find very few differences.

@Dean Turner You mean "Basic American instincts", right? China...an abject failure. Been to Shenzen lately? If that is a failure, I'd hate to see their version of success .

Are we in the same one ??

@@nora3657 HAHAHA are you at champlain?

@@annarupp-desrosiers760 LMFAO I am But i ain't watching all this

@@nora3657 HAHAHA ALISON TETT?

@@nora3657 lmfao this is literally the online version of bumping to a classmate on campus

Having an environmental impact rating on every product will be a good start to this revolution- as well as corporations being responsible for every product they make in regards to maintaining the product and disposing of it responsibly when it is no longer usable. But we have to make it a level playing field for the companies involved- if they can keep making money while reducing their impact then making the necessary changes will be so much easier.

It seems the only reason we have to repeatedly talk about the problem is to scare idiotic powerful leaders like Donald Trump to listen to the solutions in the first place and put the long term health of the planet before the short term growth of the economy.

yea solutions to the problems are old solutions created . .loop de loop

In a flat Earth, lol. mI agree but FIRST reconstruction. Fist is first. Carbon farmed slave populated infrastructure is inefficient resource (in every way, (time, education, saftey) sucker.

lol stop reproducing like a cancer to this planet. Smith said it on Matrix and that's the most simple solution, just stop having so many God Dame Childrens. Earth health on his own, no need to create tecnology or even care about less consumtion, recicling or have more control into polution emision.

Yes but there are problems with his thinking.

@@meilinchan7314 What are issues you find? One that I found were that he seems a little personality self-righteous, like it'll all work out in his plan.

@vice

@vice

@vice

Lmao that’s a good one ☝️

My thoughts exactly

wedsa5 When I think of people and organizations that are working on technology and ideas that will bring our civilization to the next level, number one is Musk and his companies.

Crazy.. i was thinking the same exact thing.

Elon is our new savior.

Batteries are not sustainable, which makes electric cars and solar panels unsustainable. The waste from these technologies are extremely toxic. Nuclear power is safer than ever before, despite the misinformation and hype. On a whole, it creates much less pollution than coal.

Nathan Clark I could say basically the same thing about nuclear. It also relies on non renewable resources. It also makes toxic waste. Li-ion batteries and solar panels are recyclable. Li-ion isn't the end game here. There are other ways to store electricity and materials engineers are working on new battery tech. Why hate on batteries and solar? I like nuclear, and I'm fully aware that it's really safe.

Beautiful

Really excited for the hope of the future. Would love to see an economy where natural resources are for everyone, are replenished and humans act as stewards of the earth. But I think it’ll be more dystopian where everyone is controlled through technology like the social credits that China uses. And this man thinks so highly of China and it scares me completely!!!

I am the nothingness and I can hear you ✌🏼

This should have more likes

We should all recignize it is oversimplified but that doen't mean it is false, it means we have to embrace new ways and make them work. It's not magic or a silver bullet, it's a ner paradigme. And I embrace it.

@@royalty_the1892 it really does

Like everything in life, these systems aren't perfect. They are tools like any other and it's up to you to use those tools correctly, and doing that is what we and future generation have to figure out. Wikipedia is actually a great source of information to get the basic grasp of something. No, it isn't always accurate but there already is the mentality of doing further research from various sources if you really want to learn more. For instance, if you get into specialised hobbies or ventures, you can use social media to get in touch with people who are doing the same thing and have encountered some of the same problems as you. Wanna start fixing your own house, car, bicycle, learn how to build a computer, create a website... All this knowledge is now accessible if you have the incentive to learn. And then there's also the very nature of Wiki itself - if you know the information is incorrect, you can correct it. If you take RU-vid specifically, it's been here for 16 years, and it took a relatively long time to get it where it is. In fact, it has spent most of its life not being profitable at all. The thing is that RU-vid exists because Google stuck to this idea and pushed for this concept nobody else wanted to do (in fact nobody does to this day). The fact the most watched channels aren't of "the best quality" does not mean the system doesn't work. Firstly, the fact that people are watching it often means they are actually enjoying it, which actually can be considered their quality. And secondly, we don't yet have good enough systems in place to get the most suitable content to the viewers. We're getting there but it takes a lot of time. Back when Yotube started, the recommended videos were just completely atrocious and absolutely not relevant. Now they almost always serve you something you will actually enjoy watching and most users will just use the recommended videos to explore content, rather than look for the most viewed channels. It has gotten to a point where it's difficult to explain how to "start using" RU-vid, that is to start finding videos you'll be interested in and enjoy watching. As you're using it, you'll learn kinda organically. And RU-vid Music? The fact it actually does provide some relevant music is great, and that only became the case in the past 2-3 years, it's definitely improving. Viral videos are really just that - there are countless examples of channels who published exactly one video which went viral, but it never really did anything for the channel itself. People simply watched the video and that's it. That is why engagement is now also an important metric. A channel actually has to produce some interesting content in order for it to become popular. You can also make a full-time living out of youtube video production without your videos being wildly popular. Many of the channels which work as full-time youtube video producers get 20-100K views per video and have a few thousand Patreon supporters. So that's a good example of decentralisation - they have (in many instances more than) two separate systems working for them. And keep in mind, nobody ever suggested video production would be a viable source of income for every person on the planet. You can't deny RU-vid has provided incredible opportunity for content creators and given thousands of them the platform to publish their work, even if they have to diversify. I'd actually argue that the necessary diversification is a positive thing. Yes, the lecture is very simplified. But it is describing some very complex systems which are still very new and in many cases we don't fully understand how they work and cannot predict how they will evolve. But the changes they've undergone in the past 10 years were very dramatic. Which is all the more reason why we should focus on them and realise they are a big deal. Companies are spending billions trying to figure this out. Again, they are tools which we must learn how to use properly.

Liked this comment despite some disagreements. I'm generally skeptical of people who talk as if they have all the answers or knowledge of just about everything when they don't cite much of anything as a source for their information. Speaking authoritatively as if you have some knowledge the general public doesn't have may sound convincing to the average person. I mean it's certainly much more entertaining. When people start citing sources, that's when people start to doze off. However, it reflects kind of poorly on their ability to differentiate between the things they know they know and the things they are uncertain of. If you speak as if you have no uncertainty whatsoever (especially regarding things in the future), it just makes you sound kind of like a self-aggrandizing idiot. it's important to express some humility when engaging in any kind of speculation. Otherwise can easily come off as arrogant or manic, like you had just snorted cocaine and suddenly feel like you've gained the ability to predict the future. It's important to relax your role a bit when engaging in that kind of speculation. While I think this speech can be motivating or inspiring for a lot of people, I think there is a lot about it that is very unhelpful to public discourse about these kinds of topics.

Me too, crazy!!!

Me three!

Agreed, Like he said its a constant cycle of back and forth

funny but the crisis was brought on by the same people who brought us the federal reserve.

And you guys still don't believe in the plandemic?

Uhhh.... Yeah we have... The whole video is literally about sharing economies. Plus, there has been many times civilized states that ran on competitive economies still have an amazingly equal distribution of wealth

@@oofman4572 i feel like this sharing economy become the fancy version of communism.

fuck yeah! RBE \m/

Somewhat familiar! Some good ideas ! Sounds like a mix of socialism with technology !

All you petit-bourgeois utopians want what proletarian *Socialism* promises Humanity-- without all the nasty, inconvenient 'revolution' stuff. You *always* pick the low-hanging, easy, sexy fruit -- and leave all the hard, dangerous work to the working-class... Grow TF up.

@Trots - To which "hard, dangerous work" are you referring? To what "low-hanging, easy, sexy fruit" are you referring? You're making the current owners of the USA (top 5%) sound like the terrorist slavers who were USA's "founding fathers". Oh. Yeah. They were/are terrorist slavers. They forced slaves to do the hard work of building the USA.

Ayandolos, what communism has to do with genocide? and what communism has to do with socialism?

They got their phones confiscated otherwise they’d be on their phones the entire time!

Nah Vice knows better than that they brought hipsters in the audience not your grandmother and grandfather and their friends

Lol

yeah good luck with that :D

In a free-market society decentralization leads to increased inequality which ironically leads back round to centralization, only this time a corporate centralization. The key is to re-engineer market processes.

You will still need a decentralised and centralized system which works together somehow. I fully support DeCentralised but it's nice to have some control when shit goes pear shaped

I don't think removing politics will help. At least part of the answer to controlling monopolies is to strategically distribute or subsidise Technology developing in AI and harnessing and storing renewable energy I do think we need to allow more freedom and democracy at the level of policy, regulated by public interest. A community petition activated system of government debate for or against a policy. Similar to the 100,000 petition mandatory debate in British parliament (but with actual teeth). This would allow the population to intervene on key issues and force government to consider popular opinion. Also, donor caps to prevent veiled oligarchy, like the Justice Democrats. Renewable energy technologies like Tesla power wall and AI farming can help to decentralize energy and food production

Crypto son!

Warning!! The Opportunity Cost, of watching a video like “Gangnam Style” is 16,000 years. The basis of this theory is flawed.. The fall out from technology will be devastating if this is a indication of human understanding, forget the coronavirus.

God help us if millennials are buying this load of diabolical fear and evil disinformation. Please fact check energy in Germany based on Nord-Stream II.

@@michaelynharris4282 Ah.. I'm guessing your're a boomer? In other words, the ignorance and conformistic nature of your generation is what has put the world in the heap of trouble that it is in. But hey - as long as you stay proud of your United States of disinformation - who cares about the bigger picture that in the end engulfs even that comfy bubble of yours.

Well, these aren't facts about Germany being made up of tiny linked green energy producers putting big energy out of business. Simply a non truth. But if it sounds good to you, then that's sad.

@@Saki-Legenda your dismissal of a contrary view with an assumption of his generation highlights your ignorance. The video offers no actual solutions to sustainable energy production. If you consider for a moment that nuclear energy and improved infrastructure is the way forward. Rifkin likens goods to data and communication. Completely illogical and useless rhetoric. He just pissed in everyone's pocket with his fantasy talk. PS. Nuclear is the future. Not the bullshit claims of solar and wind.

these 2030 advocates are dangerous

He is. So so much.

Me too. Well said.

I just jumped from Vice news to this and I suppose I'm not sleeping again tonight

What if I want to live out in Utah, away from major cities? Do I also need to give up my car?

@@andrewaguilar8317 Lots of empty land in Utah. City living for you?

Hello. I’m keen on getting started but have close to zero knowledge on how it works. How are you able to do it?

@@Alejandracamacho357 Working with an FA will help put you through on your wealth-building journey if you're just starting out is a wonderful way to get started and thats how i was able to accrued good gains . They helps to manage invstmnt overall risk profile , prevent permanent loss of cpital consider maintaining a broad diversification of your invstmnts that reflects your personal risk tolerance, time horizon, and the nature of your fin goal

@@Robertgriffinne How can one find a verifiable fin Planner, I buy the idea of employing the services of a Financial Advisor because finding that balance between saving and living requires counsel.

@@marianparker7502 Corinne Cecilia Heaney a is a good one. been enjoying a good working relationship with her. you can look her up online

@@Robertgriffinne I just looked up 'Corinne online and researched her accreditation. She seem very proficient, I wrote her detailing my Fin-market goals and scheduled a call

The problem is - most of the people who are watching this are too stupid to even understand what he is saying.. they will be the ones on the bottom of the totem pole in the new world economy!

Brian Wall back in time the weak were at the bottom, nowadays the dumb are. Somebody always is at the bottom.

Brian Wall naw the problem is its an hour and a half video and most people probably watch the first 5 minutes then comment. So dont lose faith completely.

I think that's what he meant when he mentioned the dummying down of america.

It’s a step towards communism and egalitarianism. Nothing wrong with that.

David Graeber, Debt the First Five Thousand Years

I watched a video by Zang. She said January 1st 2021 is when cash money turns into cards. I bet it takes a lot longer than that.

A decentralized digital connected world needs a decentralized electrical energy based digital currency. That does exist... a lot of people, corporations, etc are building the digital decentralized Infrastructure because is open source. Now is your turn to go into the rabbit hole with that... The old system will collapse and the change in my opinion is gonna be violent... Fiat money and debt are violents by nature.

Salaam Mohammed, i'd be interested to connect and see how we can end riba through sharing economy.. lets connect

Bitcoin.

Eliah Holiday Unfortunately this will be the new DEATHGRIP over humanity get ready for global fascism .........its in your face !!!!

Yes, we only know what we know (which is why this was so interesting to view, to expand our thinking!) The idea of touching a piece of plastic on a wall and having an electric light illuminate the darkness at a whim is our a priori experience now, but is all so new, really. (That experience didn't exist for the first 25 years of my grandparents lives!) vAnd not shared worldwide, either. It is now not only familiarity and "all we know", but a dependence we have, built for convenience and kept going because it is less work than making tallow candles for inferior light. And let's face it, for such hard workers on the one hand, we are also lazy and pampered as a society, and all of our built infrastructure caters to that. And all of that was built by the power monopoly, as you put it, and they will not go lightly into the night... Ever experienced a prolonged blackout of energy? Ecological devastation could put us there for intermittent or extended periods in the next 100 years or whatever time frame it is (and my grandparents were born 110 years ago, so this will be in the lived experience of our children, when WE are those grandparents.) So this is important. But wresting that control from the power structures that exist now is a tall order; aside from the monopolies and the corporate monied interests, just look at our Congress that is so divorced from our lives, some of them think of tech as "doohickies." No clue whatsoever. The new generations need to rush in to the civil and corporate infrastructure with new ideas, but well aware of the obstacles and how to neutralize them, it's to easy to be subsumed by these overriding interests and our own laziness too. The Beat generation and the hippies in the 60's, Occupy...they all build on each other and we learn more and more each wave, but how to take on a massive system like this will take some real energetics...that said, it's amazing how things flip on a dime when the time is right and the groundwork has been laid.

its* deathgrip. But yeah, you've hit the point...

Yes my Friend you have hit the Bull-Eye ! Your analogy and our Technology(s) is causing the Trauma of the World, PTSD.

True and I am afraid, since many countries are moving out from the Dollar dominance (Russia, China, Iran, Philippines), that the US will do everything possible to keep their world sole power, including a war that could threat the whole world... this is the current level of our leaders... they only threat each other, spend billions in weapons... instead they could use those resources to improve the world, I + D in medicine, in space, in so many areas... in fighting the hanger of half of the world, who actually it is hungry due to the corporations they created... another world it is possible, they just do not want it. Empty heads, unfortunately.

Hey Monkey - Good job , where in the world are you . I'm in South Africa and got an idea to also decentralise . how can i start ( Funding investors , Monetize ( very cheap -but serve many ) ) Thank you.

Hey, are you in Europe? Cause I need developers for a project. Inbox me for further details.

Jim Cummings Rifkins generation really f'ked up and failed their future generations and now are hoping to get bailed out and have millenials to do the grunt work while still insisting they be able to captain the ship. Time to give over full control if you want to save your old asses.

You should probably stop working on Blockchain and start working on DAG technologies. Especially if you have any interest in IOT and the Like.

The reason we are 20 Trillion in debt is because the same people getting us into debt have keys to the money printing press. You realize all of this money has been printed out of thin air with absolutely nothing backing it anymore. It used to be backed by gold which is finite and valuable. Now it's backed by nothing but faith. Cryptocurrency takes the power away from the banking cartels that have gotten us into this mess, and gives that power to the individual. A truly free market system that has no central authority.

Me2!!!! Its so encouraging to hear others are being impacted the same way I am. I feel reborn and have great hope for the future! Im gonna get this out there to all my loved ones then the public in general. Im so excited

Where have you been...this is yesterday's news.

@@weltraumaffe4155 don't be an ass

@@Nowfaithis2 check out the zeitgeist movement and Peter joseph. They seem to be the best movement already in existence that speaks to this new world we can build. But I agree, I want to be spreading it to everyone. I feel like we need to band together somehow

@@TheEvilWalrusLord Don't be a name caller. Name calling is over.

Don't be fooled by this man. He is promising a future of freedom, prosperity and decentralization for everyone ... but wants to try to achieve it through big government, central planning. This is the mistake that socialist and communist countries have made for the last 100 years. It's only led to failure, poverty and death. He's convincing because he paints a vision of the future that we will likely achieve. But it'll be through capitalism. The freedom to buy and sell as we please and to put our money towards the things that advance us is the key that got us where we are today. Giving that up and trusting the very people he ironically tells us not to trust will be detrimental. We've done this before. Many times. It's failed spectacularly every time. The future he describes is capitalism. It was made possible through capitalism. Every socialist scheme in recent history attempt to take the advancements of capitalist entrepreneurship and then take control of it to create a utopian society. It doesn't work like that. Capitalism works by allowing everyone to compete to make the best products and services. This includes energy sources and transportation. The best ideas win. If you try to speed up the process by handing over the means of production to the central planners (governments), all you can do it hope and pray that they happen to choose the best way forward for everyone. The odds are extremely low that they will especially since the power they are given to attempt this can easily be corrupted and used to maintain their privileged position in ruling over us. Don't give away your freedom to the powers that be for utopian promises. Only a free people can achieve such a thing.

FR0980Y yeah workers being in control of their own labor and resources is going to end up in Failure, death and poverty. And guess what else, if you masterbate you'll go blind! The rich people tell you this nonsense because they want to own your labor and resources so they can charge you rent and usage fees. Increases in productivity made possible by technological innovation should result in a reduction of waste and working hours period but under the capitalism increase productivity results in the billionaire class rather than a reduction of working hours. This is really not rocket science. You can calculate the energy loss when you convert fossil fuel energy to mechanical energy. Likewise, under the capital system, you can track labor energy to see where most of it ends up. Thanks the capitalism, most of it ends up in the landfill and in the pockets of the 1%. This is why the 40 Hour Work Week hasn't changed in 150 years. If you work at a TV Factory helping to produce 10,000 TVs a day, at the end of the day you probably won't learn enough to purchase even one of those TVs. If the workers don't get paid the full value of their wage, how are they supposed to purchase the very goods and services they're producing. Now if a technology comes in the doubles that to 20,000 TVs a day, does that translate in the reduction of working hours. No workers are still dependent upon the 40 Hour Work Week in order to Survive. The capitals tell workers that they can't be free because Freedom will result in slavery and death? You actually swallowed that line of crap? Of course the slaves in the Antebellum South also thought their condition was natural and necessary. They thought master was responsible for giving them food, work, and clothing,. You think that you need a capless owner in the same way? you don't think workers can produce their own TVs at automobile on their own? Without a hierarchical dictatorship?

Michael Mappin Okay, let's reason through your system of workers owning the means of production. First we have to determine how a product or service gets created. I hope we can agree that it starts with an idea. You can't supply the community, nation or world with a product without any idea of what you want to make. In a free market system, everyone has the right to do this. As long as they can save up the capital, take out a loan or obtain outside funding, any man, woman or child can start a business. They research market trends, current competition, future growth outlook, location, tax rates and a thousand other things to determine whether they think that this new business idea will be successful or not. They then take their own money and blow it all on this idea in hopes that they are right and that the business does well. If it's a small local business like most, they are probably going to need to start out doing all of the work. They might need to get their husband, wife and/or kids to help work too because now they don't have time to work for someone else. They have to live off the money they saved or borrowed until the business starts making a profit. Most businesses end here. You don't even know they ever existed. You know that place not too far from your house that's been a dozen different restaurants over the last decade? The one that every time you see a new one go in there you think, "That's not going to last long. That's a terrible location"? Each one of those is someone who took a shot and failed. The people you hate, the evil capitalists, are the few who made it work or was lucky enough to be born into a family who's parents made it work. Now of you are lucky enough to have created a successful business, you're probably not going to want to continue to work 60-80 hours a week trying to do everything. Your business is now growing and making a profit. You have the extra money now to hire people to work for you. It would have been nice to hire help when just starting out but you didn't have the money to pay them. Who volunteers to and can afford to work for free in hopes that a business with a high likelihood of failing will pan out and start making a lot of profits. Workers don't assume the risks in starting a business. They simply make a voluntary agreement to perform a job for an agreed upon wage. Even if the business does poorly, the employees still make their wages. Therefore, if the business does well, the ones who assumed the risk make all of the profits minus the hefty chunk the government takes. A very small number of businesses like Walmart, Google, Apple etc do remarkably well. They sell their product to people all over the world and only while they remain competitive and stay ahead of the market. This is how free market capitalism functions. It does not and can not ensure that everyone makes the same amount of money. For obvious reasons, very few who take this kind of risk is going to let people they hired to perform a specific task to make decisions about how the business operates unless they specifically hire them to perform this task (which is where management comes into play). This is what people do under their own volition without any outside force dictating how they run their business. So now it's your turn. Please describe how you would build a sustainable, working model of business and labor that's different from what people would do on their own. Start from the beginning where an idea is first formed. Who is allowed to pursue these ideas? Who is allowed to turn these ideas into a business? Who determines this? Where does the capital to start up a new business come from? If everyone who works for a business is effectively a partial owner, are they forced to work for negative wages if the business isn't making any profits? Can they quit if they're no longer earning any wages? What say in the operations of the business do the workers get vs what the owner gets? Is it equal? Pure free market capitalism isn't a system. It's the complete absence of a system. Socialism is, by definition, a system. Please tell me in detail what this system is and how it works. I need more than just worker co-ops. I need to know how an economy functions under socialism.

FR0980Y , any man, woman and child can start a business if they can save up the capital? Yeah, but the key word is if. most people might be able to do that because of the way the capitalist system works. Under this system if you were an average worker, you're immediately at a disadvantage! And even if you were able to overcome this deficit, you're still having extreme disadvantage because of unfair competition. you see, for some reason you seem to be associating capitalism with the free market system. I'm not sure why you're doing that because capitalism is actually antithetical to the free market system. If you truly support the idea free markets, then you would be anti-capitalist. Capitalism is a pyramid scheme. It is a system of slavery. Sure, the sleeve can extricate himself if he produces enough wealth from his master. This was often true in the Antebellum South. It would often give the slave and incentive to be both obedient and productive. Likewise, we have that kind of incentive under this form of Neo slavery. It's fascinating that you don't actually recognize capitalism for what it is. This was often true with the slaves of the Antebellum South. They thought their condition was both natural and necessary. Probably because they were born into that environment and it's all they've ever known. Likewise, you probably think this way because it's all you've ever known. I'm not really sure, but it is fascinating. If you don't recognize yourself as a slave, how can you ever Free Yourself? But anyway, let's say you are lucky enough to save enough capital to start a business. You've paid your extortion fees and now you've extricated Yourself by opening your own business. Let's say you used to be a piano at your local high school. Now you want to work for yourself so now you provide private lessons to children in their own homes. Easy enough, yes? But let's say someone like Bill Gates wants to Corner the market on piano lessons. Do you think you could compete with him? He can afford to hire people that formally worked for the symphony orchestra. you don't have that prestige. what a mother want her child to learn from a high school piano teacher or from a former member of the symphony orchestra? But let's assume that you can still compete. Bill Gates has enough wealth where he can subsidize himself and actually offer piano lessons under cost. so now not only does a mother have the option of having a prestigious piano teacher, she can get one for half the price! you on the other hand, you have bills to pay and no savings. But let's assume you move into your parents home so that you can compete with Bill Gates, at least until he raises the prices back to normal. So, not only does Bill offer piano lessons under cost, he now starts putting a multimillion-dollar advertising. Obviously, you can't afford to do that. But luckily for you, you have enough loyal customers that enable you to keep making a living while living at home. But then, all of a sudden there's a downturn in the economy and people can't afford you any longer. So you lose half your customers. But you're still surviving. So what does Bill Gates do? because obviously he doesn't want to maintain low prices for ever. He knows that if he can Corner the market then he can actually increase costs and people will have no choice but to pay them. But he needs to get rid of you and other competition first. so on top of everything else he's done so far, he also starts to offer a million-dollar prize for the best student each year. For second place, he offers a all-expenses-paid vacation Of your choice. 3rd prize is a free grand piano, the Lamborghini of pianos! Do you really think you can compete with someone such as Bill Gates? Let's say you've got a new idea for a toaster oven. You open up a factory to produce toaster ovens. You employ a thousand people! However, since Bill Gates owns resources such as nickel, copper, Cobalt, along with shipping companies and oil and gas, he can get his resources for half the price you can! on top of that, he can afford to utilize state-of-the-art technology when it comes to mass production. This is not only enables him to produce 10 times faster than you can at a superior quality, he only has to hire a fraction of the number of people you do even though he can produce more faster! and on top of that, he can offer his toaster ovens at half the cost because he doesn't have employees. he also has the ability to mobilize both production and labor if need be. there's two examples of how you can't compete.

FR0980Y , Socialism so·cial·ism ˈsōSHəˌlizəm/ noun • "a political and economic theory of social organization that advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole." Socialism is a bottom-up system, the opposite of capitalism, which is a top-down system. Instead of one share equaling one vote, one worker equals one vote. The workers themselves are the board of directors. There is no dictatorship. The workers get to decide what is produced, how things are produced, where things are produced. They don't have to worry about being forced to use toxic chemicals or engaging in production methods that will poison both themselves and their community. Note: it is important not to confuse State capitalism with socialism. From etymological standpoint, State socialism would be an oxymoron. Would it be possible to have a non-hierarchical monarchy? :D you see, both communism and socialism fall under the branch of anarchism. An means not / without. archy means rule / rulers. While it is true that the Scandinavian countries provide things like a generous social safety net and universal healthcare, an extensive welfare state is not the same thing as socialism. What a lot of people confuse as socialism is actually social democracy, a system in which the capitalist government aims to promote the public welfare through heavy taxation and spending, within the framework of a capitalist economy. This is what the Scandinavians practice. Consider Mondragon in Spain. You have a community of over a hundred thousand people. These workers own their own bank, Research Laboratories, University, means of production, etc. The workers are the shareholders and the board of directors. they don't have to worry about being forced to use toxic chemicals that would poison both themselves and their environment. They don't have to worry about some CEO or capitalist owner moving their job offshore. Instead of CEOs and shareholders ( those who don't work / produce) extracting huge amounts of money, the workers have a substantially higher income. That means other businesses in the community thrive to a greater degree because workers have money to spend on things such as entertainment, eating out, beer, haircuts, etc etc. One person's paycheck is another person's expenditure. And, unlike with capitalism, when automation replaces workers, you now have more people to share in the remaining workload. Productivity increases while the number of working hours decreases. But under a capitalist system workers that are replaced get laid off and then have to compete with other unemployed people which drives the value of Labor down. Unemployed people don't have money to spend in their community. That creates a domino effect of unemployment and economic contraction. This is why Mondragon still thrived even during the economic crisis. All wealth comes from mixing labor with capital. Every time a non producer consumes, somewhere else you have someone who produces, but doesn't get to consume. or, look at it this way. Every time a dollar goes to someone who doesn't work, that's one less dollar that someone else work for but doesn't get. This is the problem with parasites. Consider how we exploit honey bees. Every time we take honey from a beehive, the bees have no choice but to compensate by working longer and harder. If we over exploit the honey bee, they often end up dying from malnutrition or exhaustion. What capitalist parasites will often do is replace the valuable honey with high fructose corn syrup. This leads to an unhealthy bee population. However, this translates into huge profits for the exploiters. Exploitation is wrong. It is immoral. There are two forms of slavery under the capitalist system. You can either own people out right, or you can own their labor. Whether you're expropriating labor energy or honey from honey bees, what you're engaging in is parasitical Behavior.

You are talking about a problem within an industry, the financial industry. Oil spreads accross many industries and many countries and thus serves as a catalyst for economic stability across the world. You are giving corruption more credit then it deserves.

block chain digital assets Ripple XRP ripple.com/insights/the-internet-of-value-what-it-means-and-how-it-benefits-everyone/ and video ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-twqWyYrDObc.html

It's called bitcoin.

No, not ripple - ripple is highly centralized and founded by banks. However, there are tons of alternatives. Tangle, Dag and distributed ledgers. But if you wanna mention cryptocurrencies i would say Iota, Monero and many others who are actively working their way away from centralization.

The banks were selling (packaged as prime investments) sub prime mortgages which are dodgy at the best of times. These are sold to people who can barely afford them anyway. So when the cost of living rises due to fuel costs increasing (and remember fuel increases affect EVERYTHING. You can’t get goods to stores factories, power plants, without transport which runs on oil. And each step in the chain is increasing cost so an item could have triple the increase or more to an incremental increase in fuel cost. These people fell over because they couldn’t afford to keep up house payments, car payments, food, fuel they had to decide what to dump, so they abandoned the houses. You can still rent but if you don’t have your car you’re not going to get to work. There’s a good movie about it called the big short. The accumulation of the defaults created a domino effect went on to affecting the banks Once word got out that the banks had failed assets instead of productive ones the market sentiment shifted and thus began the crash. Its now happening again by the way. A number of countries are now experiencing the financial stress of the oil price increases. www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2018-10-02/emerging-markets-oil-shock-has-already-started?cmpid=BBD100318_MKT& So yes the banks caused the crash but the initiating factor was due to the rise in fuel costs affecting the cost of all supply chains to the cost of living.

dillcliff Lmao...👍

dillcliff never doubt the ability of a small group of people to change the world or ruin an intellectually motivational talk 😂 Be one or the other 💪💪

pretty much..thats were im at

I'm quite sure the majority of these posters are uneducated americans lmao

This was my exact reaction. I honestly think this was one of the most concise and objective summaries of our world and the actual problems it's facing.

the main point about young people is that they are going to recieve responsibility for whatever infrastructures are there for them, that and some of them are going to expand upon said infrastructures.

The young will turn old, so teach the young to be better and they will teach their young

sirin hamza we forge the future we live in every moment

Was Wilson there?

pepper your angus!

Dean Strandberg, I woke up cause this appeared on my auto play and I was dreaming about the intro 🤭😳

Solar power Lt Dan bullet trains all over the world.

𝑇𝑜𝑚 𝐻𝑎𝑛𝑘𝑠 𝑖𝑠 𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑑𝑜𝑓𝑖𝑙𝑒.

This is mind blowing!

You just nailed it with that comment....... I’m trying to not have a feeling about it because I’m powerless

I fail to grasp why people bother talking about "3rd or 4th industrial revolution". The next industrial revolution will come FROM a technological invention in field of energy production. You don't get any revolution until a new technology is created and starts its way to the masses, that's how its always been. Also I am really glad you see the green renewable scam for what it is. Michael Moore had a great new documentary on the subject on RU-vid

What exactly are you seeing in Germany? This is not change you’d notice unless you’re looking for it.

Well said! I am from France and I felt Rifkin was giving a strong Americanised picture of Europe. Whilst I share his vision and admire his passion, I have my doubts and criticism. Renewable energies have their limits, so does have any energy productions, as Mr Rifkin brilliantly explained. The issue with solar panel and wind turbines is that they are not operating at will, it does not follow the actual demand of energy. Electricity can hardly be stored, they got to be used on the spot or they will over power the system. It must be consumed at a low cost or to be wasted. Unfortunately, if they are not producing energy (night, no wind), some other source of energy must be used to supply the demand, meaning you are still dependent to coal and fossil fuel. Worse, a solar panel depends on coal to be manufactured, it takes apparently 20 years for a solar panel to compensate the intake of coal it was used to produce it. 20 years later, I am not sure this solar panel will be as efficient and my guess is it seems hardly recyclable. Wind turbine also requires so much steel/heat to produce, this is not clean to produce. Pad, I am a strong admire of German approach and really value the population and government desire to go to renewable energy. Germany is certainly one of the leader in the world to find alternative energies and it is to be respected for that, but it is still using largely coal and fossil fuel. I read somewhere 50% of its energy actually comes from coal. Williams Family is right, Michale Moore had his point, but it felt very sad and short of alternatives. Food for thoughts, I really enjoyed Jean Marc Jancovici presentation about the issue we are facing. He posts some excellent videos on youtube. There is certainly no systematic approach to the problem, but it is excellent to hear from a variety of experts and economists have to say. Sharing knowledge and building bridges between communities.

I get where you’re coming from. I’m from Germany myself and when you’re looking at our country you might get the feeling you have. It’s really hard to get an outside perspective at how far we have come when you are not outside (of the country). I had the privilege to get that while living for a year outside of Europe and the changes in Germany are really outstanding. One of the biggest problems is IMO that a lot of people don’t have the ability to look outside the box away from their own personal agenda and problems and also don’t want to give up their lifestyle. That’s why we have a problem to get a majority of voters behind an agenda like this an so much is done silently when really there should be more political envolvement in explaining further steps in getting to a healthier earth. Be we are on a good path here. We do have a lot of hiccups though I give you that. Partially because of big corporations and lobbyism. But I still see our politics more on track than any other nation in the world. And if we can pull it off we can teach and sell our knowledge to the rest of the world because at that point everybody wants in. The Green Party in our country is IMO just more moderate in their dialogue so they can generate more votes but if you follow their Argumentation and their political concept not much has changed in the last twenty years. Their number one goal still is 0 emission by 2040. Elections in Germany are in 2021 and if they can hold their votes from their EU election we will see a significant change in politics towards their goals. To get to the argument of energy. Rifkin actually explained how Solar and wind is going to function. If you have the whole world connected by building knots at let’s say every zip code you can redirect overflows of energy produced at sunny or windy spots to knots where they’re needed. Also engineers are working on technologies to save your produced energy to extract it when needed. You can’t just say this is not working because you don’t know the next step, you have to keep researching within new fields to get there. We can’t give up! We are quickly running out of options which puts us all in the same boat.

Carsten Ehlers I don‘t know which country you mean but you surely know then that Germany is still quite bad in per capita emissions in int. comparison no matter how much change we already had. Sure there are some worse countries and we’ve improved but the big majority of countries is still by far better than us. That is even true although we externalized some energy intense industrial productions to other countries though we are the consumers in the end. My point was: we (the western countries respectively their politicians and ppl like Rifkin) have not a glue of an idea or concept for a society or social structure which is sufficiently sustainable to preserve a livable planet for our kids and grandchilds till this day. In opposite to Rifkin’s narrative we are indeed the problem makers and not the problem solvers. Sure, the opposite surely sounds better to our ears and feels better for our self-image and so we desperately want to believe it but it‘s objectively wrong. Once again: we won‘t rescue the world in selling more and then allegedly green stuff, we (1st and 2nd world societies) are to the contrary the trouble makers on this planet. No matter if one of our societies may be a little better than the other, it is by far not enough. I live in a federal state ruled since almost a decade now by the green party and no matter what they officially say what they will maybe do in 2040 (lol, long time till then, easy to promise everything, we know that game meanwhile..): the first thing that happened when they won the election was that the new green governor turned into the biggest lobbyist for the locally important car industry. Indeed exactly the same like before under the conservative governor - no change at all! On contrary: the tax payers now had to pay penalties to the EU because we had too much air pollution for the EU laws. But wait, I’m wrong, they finally did change something after all law tricks to avoid EU penalties finally failed: because they are so green they finally built a bunch of air filter stations directly beneath and around the measuring stations for the air pollution (city known for bad air caused by all the daily traffic jams). And - woooow - we officially have quite clean air now because the measuring stations measure the cleaner air from the filter stations around them 😂🙈 But the same traffic jams and the same pollution like before on all other corners. Friendly speaking: green marketing - however I call it cheating at the cost of the ppls health. The same game with the wondrous german „green“ diesel technology - marketing! The same with the big electric power companies: they are not interested in a decentralized infrastructures because they loose their monopolies and they do everything to torpedo laws for fair payment of decentralized energy producers. We’ve lost our solar industry to china. We are about to loose our windmill industry to china. And on top we forget in that kind of reasoning that all those green industries need a lot of ressources and energy too to be build. It is NOT green to buy a new car with hundrets of horsepowers weighing as much as a big truck 30 years ago even if it uses electric power to drive - stuff like that is only marketing to sell new and so called „green“ products. Ppl must buy new stuff for the sake of economic growth and if they do not fast enough anymore then we get a bunch of new laws that they have to buy new stuff in the name of a fake green economy. But in fact that normally means even MORE usage of ressources and more pollution! And those kind of thinking seems to be the only so called „visions“ for our future that officially exist? Really? If you ask science it obviously won‘t solve our ecology problems at all! It‘s not that I don‘t see that some ppl honestly try to change things and it’s not that I want to give up any hope but 1. we are way too slow (which has to do with lobbyism, interests and power) and 2. we refuse to admit that we have to change our way of life profoundly and we need completely new concepts and ideas about society, distribution and the meaning of wealth. Only a bunch of new technologies within the same logical and ideological framework won‘t work out as everybody should know who knows the laws of thermodynamics. First tipping points are already done. E.g. Greenland ice shelf is irreversibly melting now which means we loose some megacities including some first world ones. Latest scientific insights: We are heading for 3.8-5.3 degree scenario till 2100 which in all probability imply int. disruptions of kinds that our societies and political systems won‘t be able to handle at all. Parts of our planet with millions and millions of ppl will probably get uninhabitable then. Wealth will decrease anyway (just ask the insurance companies and their calculations). Rifkin or politicians who promise what will be done in 2040 or 2050 are just phantasts when they believe that all those processes will still be controllable then. I strongly apprehend those hopes are the same denial of reality fairy tales we hear for decades now. The Rifkin speech documentary is a framed and quasi-religious staging itself. Just analyze: regard the usage of the music, speech and pictures and so on. It’s the marketing of an idea with the aim to avoid questioning the ideology of neverending growth. In fact he knows that and cleverly uses it to generate followers within the younger and mid-age generations for a vision some are strongly interested in. Wake up or stay a believer..

This is the first time ive heard of a college having a principal.

Agree, finally something real, informative and honest.

Admiration can only go so far. We need action. Let's start building. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-FEl0-zpXVyw.html eos.io

Mark Stobie If you have a better consensus model then I'de love to hear it. Bitcoin is governed by 3-4 mining pools. 21 "master nodes" that can be voted in and out by stakeholders is mathematically more decentralized in my opinion.

It is already happening in the foreground of the digital world. The demand is there and the new supply is heavily int he making when it comes to cryptocurrency and new business models behind it filling those gaps.

I get it, but him telling millennials to hurry-up and save the environment… it makes me think nobody was listening the past 20 years.

There ALWAYS has been climate change for 4.3 billion years...and there ALWAYS will be. Learn to think for yourself! The dynamics between the sun and earth mostly are what have and what will ALWAYS cause climate change. The rest is what is inside the earth, which is mostly caused by the sun and earth dynamic, as well as other planets and the moon but not as much. We, and our carbon "footprint" are just a fly on a camels back. If you would stop being a machine and begin being human again (it's your choice) you will be able to think once again and realize the old communists with little man syndrome are not to be trusted. Just like fau ci.... Get thinking, or you will be one of the many who will be found guilty for the destruction of our liberties and destruction of humanity...because of guys like this...not the carbon dioxide we have put in the atmosphere. Sickness of mankind is becoming a thoughtless machine

It's not a "fully encrypted dark net". It's called web3. Gosh, please don't just use random terms.

Erik Weimer I "went to work" back in the late 80's - on "Wind energy". By 2003-ish I finally had the subject SORTED. Turns out that that - because turbines and alternators have opposite "economy of size", a combination of the two has a cost/watt curve which is necklace shaped. Catenery. The lowest cost/watt region is for sizes where the T and the A cost about the same as each other. This size region turns out to be from about 0.5m to 1.5m diameter !! I have a prototype since c2006 which supplies energy at about 1/40 the the cost,/watt of that from a typical 'windfarm". So far no one is even slightly interested !

Gerard Vaughan vids or it didn’t happen

@@blasecorrea8350 You want a vid of my TAD system ?!

Gerard Vaughan post some videos on your channel, if you’re serious people would be interested

@@blasecorrea8350 You are right, I must do that. It is at least 15 years effort, and the result is a total Eureka ! It is going nowhere, apart from atop my house, and RU-vid might just get it to where it is needed. There is Wind here only very occasionally, when it has supplied at a rate of C 500 watts 240v, 2amps, DC from C20m/s wind. Solar is the best bet here - Bulgaria . Its Inlet is 65cm diameter, and outlet 92cm. It is about 1.3m long. Looks like a Badminton Shuttlecock. A 'Ducted Fan". Yes I really must make a vid., but am "spread a bit thin" ! I hope I will be able to give you an "Alert", bit otherwise I will include "Shuttlecock" in the wind turbine title, ok ?

He's doing it for the $, NOT the SHARING economy.

He been doing this for a minute tho ….

​@@richard9436 in our capitalist society all humans must earn money to survive in the world (unless you have access to money someone else earned). it's a fact of life. if you can make money by sharing positive, progressive ideas and practically reforming harmful systems (examples of reform in Germany, China were shared) how is that a bad thing? in our society we also don't accept radical ideas from young people because they are just that - unproven ideas. it takes time, experience, money, and a network of people to bring concepts to fruition. it's one thing to have an idea and another to bring it to reality. that's not to say young people don't have great ideas, but not all ideas young people have are great in the context of reality. it makes sense for an older person to have a more complete understanding of that. you must work within the existing system to create change/a new system (which is why Rifkin says there will be a transition period between the second and the third revolution). that also doesn't mean the new system will be perfect, it's just an evolution from the old, and eventually there should be an evolution from this third industrial revolution into the fourth. it's easy to feel damned if you do and damned if you don't, but that doesn't negate the positive shifts that are happening however imperfectly. progress is not linear and it is very, very messy (as Rifkin described when mentioning "happiness is the blank pages of history"). it's a complex problem and no one solution is going to solve it for the rest of time. the worst thing we can do is let our fears decide for us that we will do nothing - because then our destruction is certain.

What's the percent of CO2 in the atmosphere, and how much is too much, and why, considering that the CO2 molecule is a molecule of life?

Great story bro

DSGLABEL send Joe tweets and make him aware of this man's existance. I just did, but we wil need tons of tweets for him to care, so go ahead buddy!

Leo Charles I did brother!

Sorry guys. JRE isn't going to fall for a Al Gore lite snake oil salesmen advocating redistribution of wealth and socialism. Stop being so fucking naive just because you see a slick speaking old fart spewing out leftist propaganda and skewed data designed to scare the shit out of gullible millennials and transfer wealth from one class of people to his class of people - Marxists. Google Gulag Archipelago if you want to know how well that Marxist experiment worked.

Alex Gutierrez. says the low key imbecile.

Alex Gutierrez lol you are the reason people are flocking to the right side of the political spectrum.