the world can be confident that China will never be first to order a nuclear strike, but we can't be sure of that, with the USA...having used it twice already... if only the US doesn't provoke, antagonize or create enemies of China, peace will be had by all.
31:56 I never understand when some people talk about China destroying the balance of power because of it's growing strength. Yet these same people don't talk about the current imbalance and unchecked power of the US. It's as if the scale of balanced power was calibrated after the US stepped on it but before anyone else did.
American foreign policy has been fueled not by a devotion to any kind of morality, nor even simple decency. The aim is to extend political, economic and military hegemony over as much of the globe as possible, to prevent the rise of any regional power that might challenge American supremacy, and to create a world order in America's image, as befits the world's only superpower. William Blum, Rogue Nation The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence, clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, most of them imaginary. H.L. Mencken, 1920 War is a Racket… Smedley Butler
The neighbor kids were playing volleyball in their back yard yesterday. Whenever someone stet up a spike, they would all yell "Nuke-em!." This is how easy it is to revel in mass destruction.
Thank you for covering this. I've lived my entire life under the threat of nuclear war with many close calls and now my son is in the same position along with my grandchildren. How long before it happens, probably by accident. Someone's warning system malfunctions and the world ends
I`ve never been on this channel before,but hearing within the first minute that the PC Wokeists at YT are banning their videos tells me Analysis News is saying something worth listening to.
The MIC has no conscience and everyone is expendable because that's a prerequisite to being a part of this insanity. Mr Wilkerson knows what he's talking about and should be taken with the utmost sincerity.
This is a absolutely essential interview, that the public need to know about,especially the young as these people can ruin their world. RU-vid, let them keep enlightening us about the facts.
This will occur over forth part of earth in and around great river Euphrates killing one third of mankind than nuclear winter and final one hour biting read no study your scriptures you can get it even from King James Version Book of Yahweh is the best
They think if nuclear war happens that Jesus will come back and take them to heaven. There's probably a quarter of the population that are every bit as crazy as kamikaze pilots and suicide bombers and some of them are in the military.
Having watched and studied all this happening over the last 70+ years I must agree....it is the most amazing thing we have so far NOT had an apocalyptic end. It is insanity, not metaphoric insanity but cold, calculated, ingeniously designed....insanity. We baby boomers have been lucky. Future generations need something more than luck.
I truly appreciate your efforts in making this meaningful conversation happen. We have to face the reality and treat it seriously for the good of the human beings.
You gotta pay for it tho... youtube manages advertising to fund bandwidth, and brings you the passing-trade of people who have never heard of you, and wouldn't ever even hear about your website... maybe websites don't need any major comeback, maybe they's plenty, they just have no way of getting your attention. Yeah, you can say anything you like when no one's listening.
Another aspect of this lunacy are the cost involved for something nobody wishes to use and only to use as a deterrent, like in 'mutually assured destruction' (MAD). Considering that humanity is facing serious climate challenges that are potentially existential, that money would be better spend on mitigating the destruction we are causing in the environment and the climate.
The US has a serious need for low cost, fire proof housing. I'd like to see us put our military budget to building houses and public buildings for the people in this country.
@@kindGSL USA might wish to also consider Reinforced Concrete Homes to be Mandated in Tornado Alley. Either you build robust or you don't build/rebuild at all ! I'm sure every insurance company would be in support of this idea !
China announced early this summer it plans to build another 43 Coal Fired power plants, and 18 new blast furnaces. With an annual increase in CO2 equal to half of the United Kingdom's total current annual output. What does China know that most of the West doesn't ? That CO2 warming is prairie fertilizer.
@@danwelterweight4137 The point is no-one should care about CO2 emissions. Earth's CO2 level dropped incrementally more in each past glaciation cycle. It fell to 180ppm at the last glacial maximum (20KYA). Just 30 ppm about the "death zone" for plants. Like a human climbing past 8K meters on Everest. CO2 is the base of the food chain for all life on earth. CO2 is plant food. There are already signs of "greening" from the additional CO2 humans have added since the Little Ice Age. Life would be better, a garden at 1000-1200ppm CO2. Yes, three times today's level. Yes, we need to heavily restrict real toxins, real pollution. But since we are 2000 years + past the average time Inter-glacial warm periods last, we need to prepare for the next era which will be COLD. In the last 2.5 million years of the Quaternary Ice Age we are still in, on average only one of every 12 days is warm. The other eleven have seen 70% of North America under 1-3 kilometers of ice, 10% more under permafrost, and the southermost 20% remainder under a climate more like current Edmonton than Houston.
In 1958 PRC got no Nukes and dirt poor and USA was high, high up there. Scenario of 1958 was very, very different from 2021. Point-less to track back and project or even taking reference from 1958 to nowadays.
Those are not missile silos in the photo. They're windmills. In fact, it even says so on the right side of the photo where is says, "YUMEN GANSU WINDFARM." That just shows you how sloppy the Washington Post is.
If there are three lessons history taught in the last 100 years, it would be You don’t march on Moscow, You don’t occupy the Middle East, and You don’t bluff Beijing.
This discussion with Col. Wilkerson expresses the truthful situation which is scary and real. Thank you so much for this video and may I seek more of such videos
Thank you! From theAnalysis.news we appreciate your comment and look forward to making more content to keep you informed! We work hard day in and day out to keep you informed and don't plan on letting you down! Don't forget to Donate to theanalysis.news/Donate/, Subscribe, Share and Repost. We can't do this without the support of our viewers.
In the war games General Wilkerson spoke of, why did they end in nuclear war and not stalemate. Which party carried out a nuclear first strike? Why was the mutually assured destruction principle (MAD) assumed not to be effective anymore? It's worked very well in the past.
These kinds of wargames are supposed to explore how a conflict might develop, not how it might be stopped short of war. The problem revolves around how the U.S. keeps it's carrier battle groups alive. That usually means nuclear tipped AA missiles against swarms of aircraft, or nuclear depth charges against enemy submarines detected approaching the CBG. Without that taking place early on, the CBG either is destroyed or so badly damaged it has to retreat.
A nuclear free planet would immediately blossom into conventional war. Probably going into chemical or biological attacks. Be careful what you wish for.
If Japan puts missiles threatening China, will Russia be far behind loading missiles onto the kuril islands? If anybody's been reading the global times and the readouts from the Russian foreign Ministry it's clear they are now in a compact of mutual defense.
@@Q_QQ_Q so you are saying Japan is really willing to risk having both China and Russia consider it a nuclear target? Other than robots, there's no way the Japanese population will die on behalf of their rulers. This is not the same people who allow themselves to be abused during the days of the Japanese empire.
In order to have God's mercy He would have to foresee us having a need for Him, hence, repentance, or the changing of our minds. "For the sorrow that is according to the will of God produces a repentance without regret, leading to salvation, but the sorrow of the world produces death." 2 Corinthians 7:10
@Miles Doyle OK so you like hearing yourself think... But my life is not that long... If you have a point to make... and I say if, a sentence should do it... Rambling nonsense is not an argument... Regurgitating other people's thought's ditto... The FACT is the one who 'claimed' to be 'God' didn't believe himself. No amount of sophistry can undo that fact...and the fact it was by his own words...reveals the lie...
Analysis or no analysis, *[WE]* would all *[STILL]* be smelter together to smithereens if anyone as much as try to hit that Tora! Tora! Tora! button...
A good discussion with Col. L. Wilkerson. I thought he was a hawk based on a clip on Afghanistan/Xinjiang but glad to see that he is a rationale voice in this crazy military complex.
Haha 😂, your name is Louie Lee and my sons name is Louie Dee that’s nearly has crazy as this interview, don’t get me wrong I always thought the yanks were crazy,? but not this crazy, what Col. Wilkerson said here is really fucked up Louie.
he was speaking hypothetically in that video, but if he was still in office i don't doubt that would be his view, he also said a short while ago that he was against withdrawing from Afghanistan because it is a strategic position to counter China. That being said he speaks sense and i respect a majority of his views
here is the scorecard in the US vs China. Who has been the belligerent? You be the judge. Chinese military interventions against the US. "0" US military interventions/invasions/wars against China 1843. US military forces invade China after a clash between Americans and Chinese in Canton. 1854. US military forces occupy China to "protect" American interests in Shanghai during Chinese civil strife. 1855. US military forces sent to China to "protect" American interests in Shanghai. 1856. Battle of the Barrier Forts. US joins the UK in its war to force China to import opium. 1859. US military forces sent to China For the "protection" of American interests in Shanghai. 1866. US military forces sent to China to punish Chinese for an assault on the American consul at Newchwang. 1894-95. US military forces land in China and march on Peking during the Sino-Japanese War. 1894-95. US Naval vessel beached and used as a fort at Newchwang. 1899. US invades China in 1899 to put down the Boxer rebellion. 1911-41 US military forces occupied various parts of China ostensibly to “protect” American interests. 1945-49. US occupied parts of China in Operation Beleaguer. Over nearly four years, US forces engaged in more than a dozen skirmishes with the Chinese communist forces. 1940s-1950s. The US waged a proxy war against China with the forces of Chiang Kai-shek. 1950-53. During the Korean War, US General MacArthur threatened to destroy China unless it surrendered. He also threatened to nuke China. The US bombed Chinese territory across the Yalu river. 1955. The CIA tried to assassinate Chinese Premier Chou En Lai. 1999. The US bombed the Chinese embassy in Belgrade, Yugoslavia, killing 3 Chinese. 2001. A US spy plane crash landed in China. The US has been conducting such spy missions for decades. China has conducted no such missions against the US.
Larry's insites are always highly valuable but now they seem to have more relevance than ever. I wish him a long life and good health. Not many I can say that about from that Era of politics & war.
Indeed, state leaders should only have a mandate to negotiate anyways, You want these people to form good relations and trade with other countries, not bad relations & war.
You Tube: My mother and Father are dead. I am 67 years old. I can decide what to listen to. You really are not my Mom or Dad and as they taught me well because they knew someday I would have to take care of myself. I don't need a new Mom and Dad I am an adult who can decide for my self. so please stop treating your viewers like children. It is insulting. Going over to Rokfin and Odysee and Rumble more because you treat me like a baby and not an adult and it is not appreciated, you make me feel bad not what a company wants of its customers. Bad business practice to insult your customers.
Are so-called "tactical nuclear weapons" still a thing? As I understand it their yield is relatively low, which has caused some in the military to believe using them in a conventional war would be perfectly appropriate. And that in turn would mean a shorter step to full nuclear exchange. The world's leaders have truly gone crazy.
@@jackmeoff7456 In terms of nuclear insanity, perhaps. In terms of the pandemic and climate change, for example, I would argue that many leaders have proven to be sanity-challenged. Nuclear war would mean a relatively quick death for hundreds of millions. Climate change will mean slow, painful starvation for billions. In both cases, the deaths caused by insane, incompetent, sociopathic leaders must be considered criminal. That's why I lump them all together in terms of insanity.
@@RussCR5187 the Chinese leadership has led the world in renewables, that's pretty sane. They don't have thousands of nuclear weapons ether. Oh, and they don't invade other nations for empire.
@@jackmeoff7456 Granted, but they have greatly increased their use of highly polluting coal power plants as well. I think China's biggest advantage over the U.S. is that their leaders are willing to think long-term.
Wilkerson has an American bias. He is also conditioned to military adventurism. With an equal deterant to the US in Nuclear war or even exceeding the US I doubt the US would exchange missiles with China. They would have to accept a conventional loss or be annihilated. That is the point of nuclear confrontation.
The thought to unleash Japan is quite scary: - Japan has the ambition and capability to arm itself to teeth with nuclear weapons within very short term. The can become extremely unpredictable, since the political elites are filled with grandchildren of war criminals such as Shizo Abe and the current minister of defence. - When the US would lose control over Japan, there is no guarantee that the latter would forget the only two nuclear strikes in the human history and would dream to have the US to taste its own medicine. - The danger with China, on the other hand is that there can simply be no scenario that China would relieve the destruction and suffering of the Japanese invasion and occupation. When the US would put up Japanese to fight a proxy war with China, there would be no limit for China to avoid any defeat that would lead to another Japanese invasion. One can guess what kind of war it would be…
These countries have operational nuclear power plants .And a nuclear strike would probably result in nuclear reactor meltdowns or spent fuel storage pool fires , which would be absolutely catastrophic.
Interview was about radical end-of-days Christians/Catholics infiltrating military command. Their intention being to hasten the apocalypse. Then YT claimed it contained content that promoted the narrative that the 2020 elections were fraudulent. Have no idea why YT would scrub the video & impose a penalty. The interview had nothing to do with elections. My guess is it actually had nothing to do with the content of that particular video, but it was just a pretext for a taking a shot across Jay's bow. A warning. Either that or YT is also infiltrated by The Family & Opus Dei. lol
The bottom line is that the military of EVERY country think that they are the heart and brain of the country - the most important citizens and that the laws do not apply to them - because defense is the core reason we have cities, kingdoms, countries and alliances.
Let's not forget the reliance on very sophisticated and complex electronics that are so prevalent, aka, high tech. The EMP from each nuclear blast would wipe that all out within a given range, (not much is fortified against that) immediately. Civilization is entirely dependent on technology from one end to the other. Everything is connected now. With that and the concurrent nuclear Winter, we would be lucky to even go back to the Stone Age. It could wipe us out entirely.
What a brilliant interview, you have just earned yourself another subscriber, I always thought the yanks were crazy but believe me, I didn’t think that they were this crazy. Nuclear mines ffs, with what Col Wilkerson has said, it’s blatantly obvious that America can’t avoid a war with China if America defends Taiwan,, and its blatantly obvious that most of the people in the Pentagon doesn’t give a fuck about that either, you have to respect Col Wilkerson for giving us the truth, like I said I had absolutely no idea that they were this crazy but how wrong was I.
Yes, I remember as a 12 or 13 year old some 10-12 years ago when Netflix Streaming was in its infancy watching the documentary ‘Constantine’s Sword’ about far right evangelical Christians embedded in the U.S. military. Real deranged and spooky people and things.
Incredible interview...what a tragedy to have the destiny of humanity in hands of military and politician "specialist"without any humanistic conception of the reality... enclosed in the present and specific circumstance of the conflict and no more than that....so insane as Hitler was in his time....no difference....what about the future ? the people the planet?...everything appear secondary for the people that have so much power? ..this is the system we live in...
Talk about reducing nuclear weapons down from 4000 to 300, and over 10 times reduction, is destabilizing and could create more opportunity for one power to think it could plan to disarm or beat another. That is total folly.
when exactly were we going to "defend" Taiwan after almost getting our ass kicked in Korea.. ( oh- and Vietnam ???) Also how do we get involved in a "war" with China when so much of our, and the worlds, manufacturing capacity is in China- without starting a world wide economic depression regardless of what happens with nuclear weapons..??? Nice to see someone actually mention Japan for a change of pace though....
When China recently threatened Japan with a nuclear first strike if it 'interfered' in the Taiwan situation, I asked myself: will the US embark on all out nuclear war with China on behalf of Japan? And my immediate answer was, no. What's more, China knows this. I realised right then that if we want to contain China, Japan must, as the General here outs it, be unleashed. She needs an independent nuclear deterrent as soon as possible, and if I were Japanese I'd want one. I'm British, and we do have our own independent nuclear deterrent, which means we're not absolutely dependent on the US. That's a very reassuring thing to know for us.
@Darrell Taylor Could you find some links to that? I haven't heard of that. I'll try to find a link to the information I've given. I'd actually be very surprised if Japan had said that.
With a nuclear war is One way of finding how good made in China goods are Is just that China did really good job with exporting the wuhan virus world wide, can they do the same with nuclear weapons?
I was going to listen to your video but when you showed news reports about nuclear silos in China which clearly says YUMEN GANSU WINDFARM then I'm no longer interested anymore. This story has already been debunked countless times on Twitter and a simple Google Maps examination proves exactly that. It's a windfarm. There were even British nationals that went to Gansu province to report on China's clean energy infrastructure in that region. But I changed my mind and I'll continue listening and point out other issues I see if I find anymore.
Only desperate American WARMONGERS would even contemplate such a question! Nah, we are good over here in China! We are working very hard for a moderately prosperous future for China and the Chinese people. Why would we spend a Great Wall of money, a millennium of hours and oceans of sweat with a splash of blood and tears thrown in for good measures to build Brand new State of the Arts 21st Century Mega Metropolis, The World's most advanced infrastructures, The World's largest advanced manufacturing facilities and processes and The World's most advanced and longest High Speed Rail lines if we were planning to go to WAR just to sooth our egos and pride? However, do not confused yourselves with our attitude of avoiding any kind of wars(especially nuclear) or conflicts by whatever means or costs when possible with the notions that we are weak and and scared of the US cos it will be the last of the thousands of reckless, inconsiderate, selfish and just plain arrogant but avoidable mistakes that you have made over the years at the expense of millions of innocent lives. It is not a threat but a clear statement of China's intent and warning to the US and everyone else.
I would love to hear the Colonels opinion about the recent (last year) theft of radio equipment from the Russian Doomsday plane. Is airborne command and control really the best strategy? Given the fact that Colin Powell number 4 in the line of succession did experience communications jamming on 911. The whole presidential line of succession had "communications problems" that day. The Pentagon was hit was no warning. etc
@@jackmeoff7456 Get off it Jack, Why play with Dick Cheney's cover that he knew? 10 September 2001 Russia begins nuclear exercises. Putin is sitting in the catbird seat with his finger on the button. 11 September 2001 The strike on the NAVY OPERATIONS CENTER & DIA Office was a Russian retaliatory strike avenging the sinking of the Kursk by the USS Memphis and the USS Toledo. 911 more generally was the response to the US sponsored proxy war in the Caucasus Region. The US was trying to break the region off from Russia. The Russians made it clear in late 1999 that they were going to nuke the US AGAIN. (OKC-95 & WTC-93 were also "red mercury" strikes. ) They made it clear they were going to nuke us over Chechnya. 911 was the opening rounds of what could have led to a much more extensive nuclear exchange. Say what you will about GW Bush. He made the right decision that day by not going to nuclear war.
@UCwZ81Kn9SmAaOkmB5_By4Bw there is no possible way an airliner made such a small hole in the Pentagon, but it's just the right size for a missle. I saw the aftermath on TV, there was no large debris field typical of plane crashes, same with Shanksville. Also, the Pentagon has cameras all around it but all that is released to the public are 5 grainy frames from them and they show what looks like a small missle, not a large aircraft.
@@jackmeoff7456 Those facts show that the airliner was e-hijacked. A human cannot fly with that kind of precision. But a robot can. Where is Barbara Olson? If it was a missile, then she is still alive. Produce her.
The world community collectively needs to focus on all together scale down all NUCLIER. Stock piles. And ALL SERIOUSLY. LOOK at reducing current possible extinction of the world of NO SERVIVERS!
Isn't it nice to know we have a demented sociopath civilian leader who would never dream of using nuclear weapons. Keeps me warm in my bed at night......
