The Troubled Case Against Jane Dorotik | Full Episode 

Qfhi

😮Couldn't they test the " blood ..that the detectives found on on the wall.?!?😮 PS came back later found out they did test the blood.. and it was his the husband's.. So pathetically sad 😮 anyways I believe because of money the daughter took her mother's side +Allegedly ..helped her too.. Instructions and family already are happening through all kinds of other unstoppable things that happened to families illnesses etc but this is sad when you put it on your own family 😞 People keep your family together if you want money and everything to yourself then just be by yourself don't bring other into it your psychotic life.." Ok Peace 🕊️😊 4.6.2024

😮😮😮😮

😊

4 th of June 2024 - oh yeah Americans are the only place to mix it the other way round and remove letters from ENGLISH words like colour and neighbour- from a woman in England lol

It's validating.

It's still one sided. Whichever side the funding is on. The media has been used to control and influence people for 200 years. Especially since JP Morgan bought the top 25 newspapers in 1922. For the sole purpose of controlling the narrative. Now they own all media.

I fully agree - Excellent in every way. Am thankful for it.

Watch Forensic Files...

@@lindaweber5599 Who/what is validating? Your answer to the comment the previous person ?? I am too confused! 😮

He didn't look like he weighed that much tbh. The man was a racing snake!!! A lean-mean-jogging-machine...a man so lean his eyeballs were in single file. I put his weight at 40lbs max. "Dragged him?" She could have thrown him in the truck over-arm!

Maybe, but I first thought there was no way I could move my very heady bed Frame and mattress to shampoo the carpets underneath and I'd have to wait for my husband, until one day my dog had an accident under there and I was determined to clean it. Needless to say I somehow managed to move the entire thing (with health problems) and then place it back. It wasn't easy and took a long time but it was done. She didn't report him missing until well into the evening and he left in the morning. Plenty of time to take breaks and try different tactics. Sorry for my rant hahaha

@@sammyb1651 40lbs? That falls right in the middle of an avg 5 year old. Do you even process what you're writing? You'd be surprised how heavy a person weighs. if u meant 140, then we're starting to go somewhere.

@@jyc313 Sorry. Not 40lbs. Anywhere between about 39 and 41 lbs.

Watch the forensic files episode. It explains that there was a male ranch hand that sided with Jane and the daughter in wanting to expand the ranch. Bob was against it. They thought it could mean tons of money. They were all in on it together. Hence why the daughter refuses to testify and was the only one proclaiming her mother's innocence. That's how you easily move things: more people 😂

The State are clearly satisfied she's guilty. They just know they can't prove it to a criminal standard any longer due to the loss of evidence. I think they just abandoned it in the end because she'd already served 20 years. That's something at least! The fact her "innocence" team wouldn't make themselves available for comment tells a story of its own. As does the fact two of her children testified against her and her defence was based on the other child being responsible. A truly ruthless manipulator! Incidentally, re: her response to the massive pool of blood on the mattress ("He told me he'd had a nose bleed once") Ahem Said no woman EVER before or since! Women will have a full on melt down if you so much as set your beer down wrong on the coffee table. They do NOT casually ignore it when you (supposedly) turn the bed they share with you into something resembling an abattoir floor.

@@sammyb1651 Only going to argue with the last point to please don't generalize; you're just going to get it wrong half the time.

@@BlueCyann Is incorrect. Generalizations are perfectly valid. It's a RU-vid comments section, not a court of law. We're not dealing with rules of evidence or concerned with proving anything beyond a reasonable doubt. Her liberty isn't at stake. We're just talking conversationally based on what we saw on a TV program. Additionally exceptions that disprove generalisations are just that. Exceptions. Ergo they wouldn't result in error "half of the time", merely occasionally. Your analysis is flawed both qualitatively and quantitatively. 👍

You obviously never had nose bleeds!

dearmakeupdiary... I don't disagree with you but how do you explain her dragging his dead body from the bedroom, out of the house, to the truck, then lifting him up and over the tailgate. That to me seems impossible.

Yo...he's gone. There is nothing she can do for him. What she can do is get herself out of prison to make sure she stays with here family because at that moment. A horrible crime happened to Bob, but that's done, and now a horrible crime is being committed against her and it's ongoing.There are times when you are COMPLETELY 100% allowed to be selfish. This is one of those times. She has been fighting the system for 20+years. Now that she's out, now she can finally grieve for Bob. Don't pretend to be some holier than though, virtue signaling martyr, no one fought for this woman, she has every right to fight for herself and move on.

@@jennymaria86I agree. Also, we don’t know if, how or how long she mourned for “poor Bob” of camera. This show is about her. Obviously she is going to tell her story.

Frankley, rewind. In the beginning before her arrest JANE was the one saying all of that. She lost her husband, her home, her children, her horses, her freedom and her dignity, and got 20 years in a cement jail cell for a crime she didn't do. Um, yes, let's all say it together....poor Bob.

Can't explain the bloody fingerprints says a lot

@@peggypasson8794 Rewind. That was explained.

Three sides to every story Jessica; Yours , His, and God Almighty's. SONS do take sides in families-it's not for US to ascertain. They didn't say she was a "bad" mother, they said they thought she did it? Why were they not questioned on WHY they came to that opinion? Not very complete. 1: Have to ask after having watched several episodes of Forensic Files... WHAT ANGLE does a perpetrator have to stand it, in order to produce blood spatter on three surrounding walls, simultaneously ? 2, What weapon throws blood spatter at three walls, from the exact same distance from the floor? 3. Where were the samples of hair, fingernail content, or transferred evidences from a potential perpetrator stored from 20 years ago ? DNA on other crime stories is "stored " for decades and bought out to be used OFTEN; Why not in THIS CASE ? Blind Eye is Correct: Look at what was NOT considered ? 1. hit and run on a curvy road? (How did he get to that area-if he wasn't biking?) 2. No follow-up on the car the witness saw at the crime scene? Why not? Had Bob been a female, MANY DNA samples would have been taken. 3. Love the normal accurateness of "Forty Eight Hours", however, it seems they skipped over Jane's answer to the question about "when last seen?" Did he go out riding his bike for sure? Did he go walking? Was he "offended" by that person he met with...as he said, and Jane said , that he said.. HE WENT OUT FOR A JOB! 4. No mention of lie detector test results ANYWHERE ? 5. Whether one witness speaks up or not. A statement by a son who was raised with his own views of his own homelife or parents' ability to communicate, IT'S STILL A PERSONAL OPINION. This does resemble the road to Valley Center...DANGEROUS to ride bikes OR drive btw! I hope Jane gets reciprocated for her pain and suffering, and soon! "Man on the Run" and "I Ain't no Middleman," VideosToEncourageHumanity LyndaFayeSmusic@Yahoo

Well said ​@@lyndafayesmusic ! OP, she had to do TONS of private investigating to try to find her husband's true killer. The flyers were everywhere, but police actively held back information from witnesses that didn't fit their narrative. It was so corrupt. Consider that maybe you don't know all the facts from a 40 minute show and don't need to throw stones at a woman who went through so much.

Interesting take 🤔

@@yolandashaw2940that’s one word for it. People like OP are the reason why I’d never agree to a jury trial. You have to be crazy or just stupid to ignore all those holes in the prosecution’s case and still come to the conclusion “she did it.”

@@EchoJNot believing her in the “real world”(outside of court) & finding doubt on a jury are two different things. That’s is what I think people fail to understand when on a jury.

dna already prooved she is innocent.. geez.. common sense left the chat i guess

The way she has answers for everything it's just unimaginable

@@Corylus46 yeah, if they want to actually find blood. But in this case some random stains that look like blood get someone convicted!

Good catch haha.

Haha my house everyday : there appears to have been a struggle ...

@@Corylus46no I think they meant as in having a clean house so you can know exactly is something not in place. Like not cleaning up the dogs blood. They actually had a case where a woman and child were raped and murdered. The lady vacuumed her house the night before and they were able to get so much pubic hair out the carpet since it was freshly done.

Yeah because the technology wasn't still available

Wat if she took the bullied for the daughter ??? Have u thought about it? There was some truth ..why didn't she put the blame on the sons ? It was the daughter

Bullet*

@@Kevindesiren if she had taken the bullet for her daughter, why would she agree with her lawyer to point the finger to the daughter eventually? 😅

@@smurfiennesShe only agreed up to a point. I also think the daughter did it.

@@dkaob8351 The daughter had an alibi. The wife did not.

EXACTLY THAT ALONE IS A CRIME THAT WAS THIS LADY'S LIFE DOWN THE DRAIN.

​@ms.chrisie8040 yes, but will these folks who lied, assumed blood no testing ever be tried..&.punished... This has happened in other cases. But cops just want fast closure... .cuz maybe political election coming...

Whose DNA was it??? Male but not her husband's...she deserves money for time lost making money and over zealous PROSECUTION, who mislead jury....

And those who bent the truth, not totally true, need time in prison, just a couple of cases of misleading Prosecution, spend 6mo or year, will be more accurate and honest...many others will learn...

Misleading jury...curiously we get to watch court cases on internet or TV...may force more honesty

Do you have pets? Not all the DNA was tested so it could’ve been from a pet. And that picture of handling evidence without gloves?! Tainted crime scene!

Also, living on a ranch there could have been mice. My cat catches them in our city house and flings the mice all over the place.

Maybe her husband sneezed with the bloody nose. Maybe it wasn't even blood. Too much reasonable doubt.

Not everyone is you. 🤦🏻‍♂️

I don't live in a ranch at all, and I have blood spatter all over my house. I have conditions and very clumsy. I live alone. 😅

It was proved it wasn't all blood,

Killer housekeeping

If it wasn’t all Blood it still wasn’t thoroughly cleaned @shivanipaiverma2230 I’m w/you what kind of housekeeping went on in there? 🤢 Seems Like Not much 😬🤮

and what kind of "nosebleedong"! I ve had nosebleeding, the blood pattern how it was spread is totally NOT from a mere nosebleeding...

@@margochanning6868 😂😂😂

The evidence speaks for itself. This lady seems guilty as charged. She's a good actor and cold and heartless in implicating her own daughter. Enough said.

these vil witches dont care, look at casey Antony

@@rachelmurray1228 agreed

That‘s when I said: Guilty! I would never point the finger at my daughter.

I quit at 24:00, when she blamed her defense attorney, and said she would have stood up and declared herself guilty. Well, it happened, and you didn't do it, did you?!!! This woman is disgusting.

Yes🎉🎉

You are not the only one. I think she was guilty.

Yeah I find it hard to like anything about her. I also don't believe the case against her was pristine nor beyond reasonable doubt.

Thank God the court of public opinion has no bearing on legal standings it doesn't matter if she's unsympathetic or not it only matters if she committed the crime and there is no actual proof she committed the crime the syringe that has her bloody fingerprint on it and his blood is irrelevant because there was no tranquilizer in his system so that that they keep spreading around is irrelevant whether she was very emotional and court or showed no emotional at all is irrelevant whether she was a good housekeeper or a shity housekeeper was irrelevant that are son said that she argued with her husband and threatened divorce was irrelevant there was never any signs of domestic violence that was relevant public opinion has no basis in a courtroom

She is a Murderer!

No, not really. They spoke of their parents 'marriage' as how they saw it as children. All couples have verbal arguments.

I disagree. The sons stating ‘yes she did it since they fought sometimes’ seemed weak to me.

Nope, not really. If they had said their mom could NOT have done this, then would you equally say then she must not have?

What? Are you ok with convicting someone when you are not 100% sure they committed the crime?

​@@MadBroStudioI think they are saying it's puzzling because we still don't know who did it....not saying she should be convicted without enough evidence. It's true though there is still no closure for this case. It's PUZZLING, lol.

​@@MadBroStudioThe standard is "beyond a reasonable doubt," not "100% certainty." Otherwise, the US would have a prison pop. of about 500. 😂

So she should be in prison? Beyond reasonable doubt doesn't apply here?

Guilty people do get away with it sometimes. Beyond a reasonable doubt does mean virtual certainty according to what I have read. Juries terrify me because none of us agree on anything.

Very strange. I think the daughter was involved but the mother did it for sure.

@@chandracox6814 yeah... I mean they suggest that the mother put the body herself in the trunk. Women can be strong , sure, but a grown man is very heavy. She might have had somebody's help

The fact that she didn't get a fair trial doesn't mean she didn't commit the crime.

In all fairness, they didn't have a chance! They immediately had to go into defense mode!

@@angelalalley7593 I agree, but I've seen murderers walk away with more circumstantial evidence...they should have investigating far more than they did though, quick and dirty this case was, and this mess could have been avoided altogether

Right! I’m so in confusion

There's not enough evidence.

@@alex-qd6of lmao , plenty of blood all over and even his blood on the tranqulizers , dont be naive.

I missed where she blamed her daughter.

@@DaniSmitheher defense team did

Children can be frustrated or angry with parents for one reason or another. Their testimony didn't unequivocally prove anything though.

Frustrated enough to send their mama to prison? And what abt her? Wanting to send her daughter instead!

​@nikos9257 She didn't want to send her daughter to prison,she did say that if something happens to her daughter that she will take fall and say that she did it....and it was the lawyers idea not hers

all that proved is they didn't have such a good relationship with their Mom...nothing more....

@@caribbeanladyz7965 "IT WAS HER LAWYER'S IDEA NOT HERS." And who are they representing? HER! No matter whose idea it's still her trial and she cosigned on that idea 🤣🙄

I got that feeling as well. I think it was the shifty gaze. I noticed that it went away towards the end of the ordeal but it doesn't necessarily prove guilt.

Right she never thought she would be blamed arrested and convicted

This woman's been in prison for twenty years and didn't do it. How would YOU be?

Yup

Yeah, just a gut feeling I got.

I agree! She's guilty

Agreed

​@@frogbluesoh yeah you're so 100% she's guilty that DNA male DNA doesn't matter at all so glad public opinion has zero bearings in life

Oh yeah she's her 20 years was found innocent through DNA testing now she gets to sue the state sue the city sue the police department and the taxpayers get to pay for it so glad your public opinion doesn't matter so glad the taxpayers now get to pay her bill as if they get to pay her a bunch of money

​@@deetee705Pinterest chew on this while you're so convinced she's guilty she was found innocent that means she now gets to sue the state sue the city sue the police department the found her liable and you taxpayers get to pay for it congratulations

Never heard this before but it made me laugh . Thank you for sharing !

​@@Perla-w2d Really?? JJ and anyone else that old hold seems to hunt for reasons to say it! 😂😅

Right

Right! What’s the alternative?? You can nit pick any investigation. She threw her daughter to the wolves, nice mother.

@@glamourgirl-n9bif you bothered to watch the whole thing you’d know that they found a third party male dna on bob and Jane’s dna was not found on him. What now? Still want to stand behind your bs theory?

The extra dna isn’t hers or her daughter’s. Her DNA wasn’t on him at all. The blood in the house wasn’t even blood!

I always thought the daughter may have been involved in some way

Your 'gut feeling' isn't going to hold up in court mate.

Your gut makes no sense

Her kids thoughts so

Yeah, there are for sure studies that show powerful leaders tend to have psychopathic traits.

💯

💯

Thanks for the tip. Pausing this and going to watch that first. Lol!

I was going to post the same thing , as I just watched it the other day. Season 7. Episode 39, this lady is as guilty as the day is long and whoever let her out of prison should be ashamed of themselves!

She did it.

I didnt know about this case and just finished watching. I still dont know if she was innocent or guilty, so will watch another doc about this case for sure.

Is that on RU-vid? I can’t find it.

Occam's Razor

Yes, I agree. Occam's razor seems to apply here.

She wasn’t guilty.

​@@suenevin57There was zero evidence of her innocence. There simply wasn't enough evidence to convict her beyond a reasonable doubt.

How did she get him out of the house into the car

Yo waking up n we almost going to sleep

😂​@@emuchira196

I have this fire Humboldt County grown California pharmaceutical grade pot, it's the best!

yeah if only they would replace the narrator. She looks nice and sweet and all but her voice is so annoying.

​​​​@@christiannielsen3863thank you!!!!! I never watch any episode with her as a narrator. She overdoes it. The dramatic tone, the words, the questions, the pace... she doesn't belong in these type of series.

You almost had me with your first sentence. Thank you, you've humorously explained exactly what I was thinking! "The Random Killer" sure is a busy man!! 🤣🤣🤣

@@cassie1264 He sure is a busy man that Random Killer!

I couldn't have explained it better myself, You Probably already solved the the crime all by yourself, great job.👍

@@gabrieluribe1852 Thank you! ☮️✌️☮️

Is your nickname Sleuth ?😅

After he supposedly went jogging ( in the rain) and got attacked.

Have you run in the rain? My shoes come back pretty clean coz water kinda does that

Interesting observation.

"Who"

Agree. It made me grasp for air 😳 It's unbelievable 😱

Exactly. I was having doubts of her innocence, and when I heard that, My mind was made up.

​@@dorothykilgallenwasmurdere1653agreed! Evidence points to both mother daughter in on it as both remained silent.

If you bothered to watch the whole thing you’d know she was unequivocally against them saying Claire did it but they did it anyway.

Definitely...bloody fingerprint on the syringe ? She said he ran on Sunday but he was dead on saturday....all the blood cleanup...yeah, guilty.

She was innocent and she is innocent...guilty ones r the sheriff who leads towards wrongful convictions...they must b fine,ok...they hv ruin the life of vulnerable lady...

@@Mehmood-yn1obI pray you never get picked for jury duty. You’re very naive and gullible. Look at the facts without emotion.

The guilty face always yell that I m guilty ...and she doesn't even look alike...fact was there...how can a person deal a crime scene with bear hands...they just wanted to close the case soon to get appritiated by his so call officers and deppt whatsoever...and my question is what if she is innocent but they ruin her life...its very shameful for everyone of us to hv these kind of things in our system....

@@Mehmood-yn1objust coz the sheriffs botched the investigation doesn’t mean that she’s not guilty. Two things can be true at the same time

Thank you! I was wondering if I was crazy

And all of are totally convinced that you’re 100% correct since you were at the scene and watched the crime happen with your very own eyes…Your judgmental comment is simply your own personal opinion, not an empirical fact…

Are you a Forensic EXPERT ? Three sides to every story Yours , Theirs, and God Almighty's. 1: Have to ask after having watched several episodes of Forensic Files... WHAT ANGLE does a perpetrator have to stand it, in order to produce blood spatter on three surrounding walls, simultaneously ? 2, What weapon throws blood spatter at three walls, from the exact same distance from the floor? 3. Where were the samples of hair, fingernail content, or transferred evidences from a potential perpetrator stored from 20 years ago ? DNA on other crime stories is "stored " for decades and bought out to be used OFTEN; Why not in THIS CASE ? Blind Eye is Correct: Look at what was NOT considered ? 1. hit and run on a curvy road? (How did he get to that area-if he wasn't biking?) 2. No follow-up on the car the witness saw at the crime scene? Why not? (Two men in a pick up truck.?) Had Bob been a female, MANY DNA samples would have been taken & preserved properly. 3. Love the normal accurateness of "Forty Eight Hours", however, it seems they skipped over Jane's answer to the question about "when last seen?" Did he go out riding his bike for sure? Did he go walking? Was he "offended" by that person he met with...as he said, and Jane said , that he said.. HE WENT OUT FOR A JOB! 4. No mention of lie detector test results ANYWHERE ? 5. Whether one witness speaks up or not. A statement by a son who was raised with his own views of his own homelife or parents' ability to communicate, IT'S STILL A PERSONAL OPINION.SONS do take sides in families-it's not for US to ascertain. They didn't say she was a "bad" mother, they said they thought she did it? Look at the LIMITED EVIDENCE SHOWN? Why were they not questioned on WHY they came to that opinion? Not very complete. This does resemble the road to Valley Center...DANGEROUS to ride bikes OR drive btw! I hope Jane gets reciprocated for her pain and suffering, and soon! "Man on the Run" and "I Ain't no Middleman," VideosToEncourageHumanity LyndaFayeSmusic@Yahoo

@@lyndafayesmusic Might be helpful to take just half a dose next time…?💜

Really...they said that there were multiple trucks ( tires) all over that area.

@@renayeblack5906 No, HER TRUCK HAD THREE DIFFERENT TIRES ON IT !! ( All of which were at the scene)Who else's truck/car could it have been?

Agree 100%.

She did it!

@@CourtRepKneeckah yes, she did

Yes! It’s so nice xD bless!

It’s distinct. If you heard that voice with nothing but a dark screen you’d know who it was. Kind of like James Earl Jones.

@@mountainman4859 I agree on James Earl Jones. Another distinctive voice is Keith Morrison’s.

@@lauralerro6478 …Bea Arthur….lol

Many done the same, I do believe deeply that he deserves what he got. She was pist.

Worse strategy in her life ever ?! Doesn't sound right at all . I mean this would be an extremely rear life acurence, who didn't disagree with your father, I'm mean after you raise your own kids in your 50's you ohhh that's why he did or said, but to physically hurt your father? Other than talking NO I'm a total Daddy's girl sure I've been mad, but in his 80's when he passed from COVID I sure lost my best friend. I can't say I believe the daughter hurt Dad 🚫 no

She murdered her husband! The evidence is overwhelming

​@deevillarreal9475 what!! Lol wtf

It's her right to sue for false imprisonment she was found innocent through DNA testing I know you all like to believe that male DNA doesn't exist but it does any person in the United States falsely imprisoned falsely imprisoned means you were convicted of a crime that you were later found innocent of meaning you did not commit that crime is entitled to sue the state that incarcerated them the city that incarcerated them the police department that arrested them and all other agencies involved I hope she wins I'm so sick of reading all of your guyses bulshit comments about how evil and how disgusting she was of a woman when she didn't do anything there wasn't even a history of domestic violence between those two for all you guys screaming and yelling and bitching take a look at your own lives God forbid somebody walk one of you guys up for something you didn't do and the world say you actually did do it I'll wait that might actually be funn😮y😮😮

She doesn't have to explain anything. The prosecution is the one that has to lay out the case against her.

@@JJJJ-gl2ufBut that's why they have 'interrogation', sure she has to give an account. And her response speaks for itself, or as they used to say, and still do in cases like this, res ipsa loquitur, that's all the Latin I know but it says it all. I am so pleased that from what I read here she isn't fooling anyone. Yeah, the nosebleed of the century.

How can she explain something she didn’t do? 🤔 I wouldn’t even attempt to explain something I had nothing to do with u must be nuts

She killed him.

Same so much blood from nose bleeding,,also the food he ate they tested

It is absolutely unclear who’s blood it was, and if it even was blood. Also, many whitnesses saw him jogging and someone saw him in a van with unknown men. Together with the new DNA evidence, I don’t believe she has done it

Based on the sneaker and socks combo I'd say he was dressed in the dark at gunpoint.

She killed him

haha

The idiocy of the comments. Did you understand ANYTHING they said. She didn’t blame the daughter the attorney did. Further the sloppy investigation and gathering of DNA is poor. None of her DNA was on him, the rope, or under his fingernails.

She's as guilty as sin.

She thinks her prim and proper act is working. I see and hear a psychopath.

I mean 2 of her kids did lol

To everyone saying mom and daughter did it together hhow do u explain the male dna?

That's what I think.

Now what I read was she said she would not let her daughter go to jail .that's she would go to jail if it came to that .sad how things get totally out of context ... especially when if some cared to read her entire statement

@@peggypasson8794 doesn't mean to say it's true? 🤔 lol

@@scottaznavourian3720 wonder if the male dna was from the investigator guy clearly touching everything with his bare hands lol

With help from the ranch hand or from somebody recruited by the ranch hand.

He had a slight build and she worked with horses which requires strength.....

of course many women think thats normal, lol

They didn't test most of those stains to even confirm it was blood!

She is evil

I can't believe she did it, i have watched many many true crime shows and cannot remember a single one where a woman strangled her husband, it's just not in a woman's nature.

She said she wouldn't allow her daughter to go to jail. She say she would say she was guilty if that happened.

Not you just blindly believing what an accused murderer says

Yeah you missed the boat ob that, she literally said the opposite

That’s the complete opposite of what she said. 🙄

Honestly, u should have awoken earlier. Wtf

Her very first statement, before I knew what it was about, also gave me that impression.

It was 20 years ago. Plus being in prison for 20 years changes people.

People tell me all the time I look cold hearted but don't let that fool you. In the inside I always care. I even care too much. Maybe she's the same like me. Don't always trust what you see.

Can u also guess what object could have been used to hit him?

I used to babysit a little girl who would have nosebleeds, and they were big enough to cause that stain. It was as if a faucet of blood was running out of her nose, and it was very difficult to stop.

Did they test that spot to make sure it was his blood? Blood on a mattress my first thought is period...gross but it is an explanation.

@@awesomeanimalsofindia101😂

@@jeweliedee4299 I am sorry but sometimes what appears as "a lot of blood" may be biased by the fear at that point in time. I'm not saying nosebleeds absolutely can't, but for a nosebleed that significant he probably would have had to be rushed to the ER for an emergency consult

You would think, right?

Mammal blood looks the same. Police wouldn’t know. A detective wouldn’t know. It takes lab tests to determine what kind of blood it is, if it is blood.

Mammal blood looks the same. Police wouldn’t know. A detective wouldn’t know. It takes lab tests to determine what kind of blood it is, if it is blood.

Mammal blood looks the same. Police wouldn’t know. A detective wouldn’t know. It takes lab tests to determine what kind of blood it is, if it is blood.

Not without testing done in a lab. With the human eye it looks the same.

Good afternoon from Turkiye !🙋🏼‍♀️

Good day from Germany 🍻 The absolute best channel ❤

Good Afternoon from South Africa 🇿🇦

You are using the word literally incorrectly.

Good morning from California. I love this program too.

I agree. There are cases where the wrong person was found guilty, but in my opinion, this is not one of them. Her explanations about things were completely bizarre and for me, completely unbelievable. At least they were to me. If I'd have been on the jury, I would have easily voted guilty.

@@cathyprosser1050 That's the thing, so much goes against her yet she gives ridiculous excuses. State dropped the ball with this case and she got lucky. But at least she did almost two decades in prison, so some punishment.

It’s not about proof of innocence it’s beyond a reasonable doubt.

@@admirallily Oh, please, idea is clear of what I meant. She's guilty as sin, just State messed it up and couldn't prove it, like you say, beyond a reasonable doubt.

Agreed

Great!

Seriously?!

I thought she was innocent 20 years ago, and I still do.

@@awesomebeautiful8782 LOL

​@@awesomebeautiful8782 I agree with you. Jane is innocent.

That's what I'm thinking.

That theory is the only way I can imagine Jane being able to dress Bob after he is already dead or drugged and move his body to the location it was found. I don't think Jane could do that unassisted. She would have to have someone to help her.

I see it the same way.

@@rebeccawebb2298 That's what I said. People don't realize how hard it is to lift 180 pounds of dead weight. I think she had help!

This right here

There will always be idiots on the internet.

​@@gigiis526 kindness is free..why name calling..not nice!

they knew it was his, they tested it, the defense had to admit it happened in the bedroom

It was her husband’s blood shown by the DNA testing

Exactly

I was VERY confused about THAT one…I mean, although, DNA forensics had BEEN been involved in solving cases, by the early 2000s, I think even decades BEFORE that, science, they were able to differentiate human blood from a dang ANIMAL’S⁉️⁉️

How would horse blood get into their bedroom? Be serious

Idk, I feel like usually the obviously guilty people have answers for everything.

​@Yoyohohojujujah She did have an answer about the syringe, Bob's stomach contents possibly related to him eating leftovers, Bob telling her that his nose bled on mattress to name a few.

@@msw8839 - her explanation about the syringe was that Bob had a nosebleed, tossed a bloody tissue into the same garbage as she'd thrown the syringe. If that's the case....why isn't there a bloody tissue in that garbage along with the syringe. There isn't one. Also: her fingerprint was IN the blood.

🙏👍

My daughter has nose bleeds and no way.Does somebody just let blood pour out of their nose without putting a hand up there or putting their head back... I think something would be terribly wrong if you lost that much blood... And? Look there, he's dead.

Nonsense. Presumed innocent until proven guilty. Plus the other DNA partial profile that was not hers.

If you were put in prison for a crime you didn't commit i'm sure you would be hyper focused on proving your innocents too.

She claimed her husband used to eat leftovers for dinner ......

The police argued he never went for a run. They believed she killed him in their bedroom and then dressed him in his jogging clothes.

Her tire tracks were found where she dumped his body. He did not go for a jog cause he was killed in the house.

Did you not listen? He left for the jog before he was attacked.

@@loudloveenand the police were, as usual, wrong

They did talk about them and it was said it could be any number of vehicles in the area. That is why that evidence was not permitted at the second trial.

Exactly. Too many points of evidence in this case pointed no where but to Jane. At least she has been found guilty and has served time.

They dismissed it because too many trucks could have that tire track LOL. What in the world.

Watch the Forensic files episode. There were three different types of tires on the vehicle at the scene. Two of the same type of tires on the front and two different tires on the rear. All three tire types were identified. They knew it was a pickup truck. Jane’s truck was a perfect match. The woman is guilty as F.

@@gregv2821 I'll have to watch that later. I don't trust pattern-recognition forensic "science" as a rule. Most of it has been shown to be very inaccurate. I think there's plenty of other reasons to think it's her, but just the fact that the prosecution didn't go forward with a second trial leans a bit to the conclusion that the tire track evidence isn't all that it was cracked up to be.

Did you listen? She was the bread winner

@@elainebird58 Did YOU listen and or even watch??? Do it again, cupcake, you obviously missed it.

She didn't want to pay alimony they' were married for decades&that is suspicious why would she by past other garbage cans to throw it away in bedroom bathroom.

@@ponygirlusa That 'cupcake' so less jarring than 'idiots'.

Worse still when you try to throw your daughter under the bus

@@Corylus46 Absolutely. they were messy messy messy IMO

my exact thoughts, no doubt about it

Yep, she did do it!! It all fits! And her daughter could have helped?

She is interested and said, he went out for a jog and that's all she knew, she doesn't know what happened.

The worst of them all

All questions I wondered about as well.

she cleaned it up

She had a day to clean it up

Easy move body on dolly

She's a horsewoman - which means she's very well versed in handling heavy things like feed bags, saddles, etc. She would also have dollies and other items to move those type of heavy items. Wrap the body. Voila.

Seems pretty clean, though if they had covered all the bases right from the start to prove it without a doubt, this mess would have been avoided

Double jeopardy refers to being found innocent in a trial and then the state trying to try you again on essentially the same charges. This is not allowed, even if new evidence surfaces that basically proves your guilt. In fact, at that point you could actually admit you did it and the state can't re-try you. (They could get you on perjury however, so you'd be advised to count your blessings and keep your mouth shut.) If you're found guilty and an appeals court grants you a new trial because of issues with the first trial (which is what happened here) that just means everybody is back to square one and the trial starts over again from the beginning. The state can then decide that it's not worth it to continue (in this case, because she had already served her full sentence) and dismiss the charges without proceeding to trial.

That only happens when your phone not guilty.

And I can't believe that evidence wasn't allowed in the second hearing trial whatever

yes, it's crazy.. Also they found rope matching the one he was strangled with in the house where they lived@@KimberlyBishh

Investigators took off their shoes and noticed the wet carpeting

Unless the evidence on all four is bogus in the same way. There must be a reason that the prosecution didn't go forward with a second trial, and I suspect it's because that evidence is flawed or would be inadmissible. (Pattern recognition type forensic science as a whole has since been shown to barely be worth the effort, and just flat-out wrong a whole lot of the time. Obviously I have no idea of the quality of this particular evidence; I'm just speculating.)

Yeah I noticed they also said here all the different tyres matched. There's no way that can be coincidence.

Well, she probably had no other choice, but to become a lesbian in jail for 22 years

they are the reasonable doubt establishers. Casey Anthonys family did the same thing by George taking the blame.

She killed their father, that's what they have against her.

Or they thought that they could own the ranch if mom was found guilty?

This episode didn't feel as thorough as Erin Moriarty''s usually do.

@@melissabarham4837 I'm pretty sure they're more upset that the mom k*lled their dad then proceeded to blame it on their sister. Anything else was just adding flames to their fire

I totally agree. Many people don't seem to be able to think critically in order to read between the lines. They are assuming that the defense attorney is speaking facts and that the narrator is telling the entire story. 🙄

​@@VioletJoy: You got that right .