Shoutout to MKBHD for helping us make this video! If you want to learn more about Conspiracy theories and misinformation, check out our latest podcast where we chat with a Harvard professor about it: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-u2NeoJHP6F0.html
Too bad you missed some startling correlations A worldwide study that links 5G to Covid-19 can be found here: www.radiationdangers.com/5g/study-shows-direct-correlation-between-5g-networks-and-coronavirus-outbreaks-2/ USA Study: magdahavas.com/is-there-an-association-between-covid-19-cases-deaths-and-5g-in-the-united-states/
@@flyingblogger280 that is the stupidest shit I've ever read lmfao. Tell me, how to you explain my country of Sudan getting 1818 cases with more than 1500 in the capital with no 5G towers for thousands of miles?
I don't care if 5G causes COVID-19 or whatever (it doesn't but whatever), my only concern regarding 5G is how Qualcomm is basically forcing every manufacturer to buy an expensive 5G modem even for devices released in markets where 5G is nowhere near to be found nor will be in the next couple of years at best. F***ck!ng Qualcomm... Please Marques, talk about this in your channel! Sorry for that segway, great video as always!
@AsapSCIENCE loved your video! Thank you! Your video made me wonder if 5G’s heating side affect, despite being small, if over time it would worsen climate change. You did mention the heating was only in regards with tissue. What about air? Hopefully someone will research this :)
@@heathermacneil426 Sorry but the rfid tags are not read by the 5g frequencies. Sorry again, the power required to heat your eyes or anything else is a million times more than the power emitted or received by the 5g cell phones, or other devices.
@@patrioticcat5768 no shit Sherlock that piece of shit took almost 200 GB of space, they don't know how to compress files at infinity ward studios! bunch of idiots adding more workaround scripts instead of fixing the plagued script
Just one short correction for Marques' Explanation needed: We're NOT talking about 50 MegaBYTES or 2 GigaBYTES, but 50 MegaBITs and 2 GigaBITs per Second - that is quite the difference (factor 8 at least since 8 BITs = 1 Byte). And the Base of Mega is only a rough estimation since in Data Sience Mebi and Gibi-Bytes/Bits are generally used, which contribute to an exchange number of terms of 1024 and not 1000. If only the Terms on the base of 1000 (Kilo, Mega, Giga, Tera etc.) were used, I wouldn't have said anything, but since he confused Bytes with Bits, too, I had to correct him here. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-ZRQVPcgf5yE.html
Please educate yourselves and keep an open mind. Science does not understand the extent of the human body! ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-YFR5EtO_zdM.html
Another clue that points to the safety of 5G is the fact that it is easily blocked by obstacles, most (if not all) ionizing radiation can pass through most types of matter -- like gamma rays and x-rays
@@daniel_960_ if it can't pass through objects it can't pass through skin so it can't cause ionization (not sure if correct word) so no chance of causing cancer
hUgO6191 nah I mean why can’t 5g penetrate things but x rays or gamma rays can. The higher the frequency the less the penetration should be theoretically if you scale up the concept. Because microwaves can penetrate, 5g or light not. Though there are transparent things like glass 🤔 interesting world
@@daniel_960_ well, the truth is that microwaves actually *can* pass through matter but they don't have enough energy to cause atoms to lose electrons (ionization). Same with 5G. The thing is, these electromagnetic waves can't travel long distances because they don't have enough energy -- I think they "lose" energy while passing through matter...ah quite frankly, I don't have a clear answer to give you 😅
hUgO6191 your explanation is wrong btw. With your logic uv light shouldn’t cause ionization but it does. You guys are missing my point. The higher the frequency and the lower the wavelength the easier the wave gets absorbed by matter. So 1ghz can penetrate stuff better than 20ghz. And light with thz even worse. With uv light starting to have enough energy to be ionizing. The question is if x and gamma rays still follow the same logic. If so, they should be instantly absorbed by anything and should be quite destructive. But I don’t know anything about that high spectrum. Will google it later. Radiation which is very penetrative is usually not electromagnetic, meaning stuff like neutrons or so. Like nuclear radiation.
I’m okay with people thinking it will kill them. It only makes scientists demonstrate more thoroughly how it’s safe or make them look more deeply into what it will do to us.
Sure but a subset of those same people are the ones who go and blow up or burn expensive infrastructure like 5G towers, and send death threats to scientists and those who invented the technology.
@@ZebraGirl97 Or even more disturbingly, a bunch of clowns burning down 4G towers because these very same geniuses protesting the dangers of 5G have no clue what a 5G tower looks like compared to a 4G tower. There have been studies where a radio tower was built and people complained about headaches, miscarriage, cancer insomnia which was interesting since it hadn't even been turned on yet. In anther study, they built a transmitter and cranked up the transmission power higher and higher and asked people how they felt. They complained about feeling the energy in their bodies and all kinds of side effects from blurry vision to headaches, which again was interesting since the "transmitter" was just an empty metal box with a rotating power knob which wasn't even plugged into a power source.
Very very very minor correcrion is when you debunked 5G-> covid you said "we can see viruse's DNA", you should have included RNA since that is was coronavirus uses, not DNA. Just wanna prevent people dismissing the video for a minor thing.
True, those people would find any reason to call this fake. But let's be real, people who are dumb enough to honestly think 5g causes coronavirus don't know what RNA is
@@grapejam1735 tell that to my friend who spent a week in the hospital because of it. Oh wait, she's probably an actor that the government hired years ago to specifically make me believe in the virus, right? Good God get a grip girl
@@Kim-dl2uk no, she's just sick not of the so called covid 19, it could be a flu. Furthermore, the virus is not proven to exist because it failed Koch's postulate and was never properly isolated
I know someone who was vaccinated and practically lost their mind and their family had to treat them with herbs and remedies and they only gained senses at around the age of 20... lots of vaccinations are deadly and useless... no wonder that recently children have been dying as people are being forced to be vaccinated.
I remember when mobile phones first showed up in the '80s... and *even then* the whole "📱 = cancer" thing was around with zero evidence.😒 Some things never change.
Don't be too quick to say zero evidence. Consider burried evidence.... Conspiracy theorist are not crazy, they allow one to think before just accepting what ever the regulatory bodies push out. Remember humans are humans and humans are corrupt.
I think we should listen to the hundreds of scientists and doctors who have studied this and warn of the dangers. Should we listen? ..It's true that a 30 member unit of the WHO called the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) was near unanimous in pronouncing cell phones possibly carcinogenic ‖ in 2011. Page 21 In a 2013 paper published in Reviews on Environmental Health, Drs. Hardell and Carlberg argued that the 2011 finding of the IARC that identified cell phones as a ―possibly carcinogenic‖ needs to be revised. The conclusion on radiofrequency electromagnetic fields from cell phones should now be ―cell phones are not just a possible carcinogen.‖ They can now be―regarded as carcinogenic to humans‖ and the direct cause of gliomas (as well as acoustic neuromas, a less serious type of tumor).36 Of course, these views are not universally accepted. Page 21 And what about the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP),which represents 60,000 American doctors who care for children? In a December 12, 2012 letter to former Ohio Congressman Dennis Kucinich, AAP President Dr. Thomas McInerny writes: Children are disproportionately affected by environmental exposures, including cell phone radiation. The differences in bone density and the amount of fluid in a child‘s brain compared to an adult‘s brain could allow children to absorb greater quantities of RF energy deeper into their brains than adults.‖42In a subsequent letter to FCC officials dated August 29, 2013, Dr. McInerny points out that ―children, however, are not little adults and are disproportionately impacted by all environmental exposures, including cell phone radiation.‖ Current FCC exposure standards, set back in 1996,―do not account for the unique vulnerability and use patterns specific to pregnant women and children,‖ he wrote. (Insert slide: A Plea from Pediatricians).Does an organization representing 60,000 practitioners who care for children deserve to be brushed off along with―some health and safety interest groups?‖ Page 23 ethics.harvard.edu/files/center-for-ethics/files/capturedagency_alster.pdf
@@BuddyL You think you're clever, but it's really the opposite. The government/military (CIA) was aware of detrimental biological effects from 5G (mmWaves) already in the 1970s: mdsafetech.files.wordpress.com/2019/02/biological-effects-of-millimeter-wavelengths.-zalyubovskaya-declassif-by-cia-1977-biol-eff-mm-waves.pdf Lots of suppressed declassified information on this topic if you actually look for yourself
I love that you tried to make the video as clear as possible to actually educate the people that believe these conspiracies and didn't ridicule their fear and worry over new technologies that they might not understand yet. This is the best way of teaching people keep it uuuup ☺
A critique of this video: You should have covered microwave ovens. Often I see people conflating low energy microwaves from radios and wifi with the microwaves that cook food. A quick primer for those who don’t know how a microwave works: the voltage from your outlet if stepped up to 2000 volts via a transformer and capacitor. That voltage runs through an anode and cathode that’s surrounded by a cavity magnetron. The physics of how it works is too complicated for this reply, but what it does is generates HIGH ENERGY electro magnetic energy in the microwave range which in turn bounces back and forth inside the oven to heat your food. The fan you hear when turning on the microwave oven cools down the cavity magnetron. Let’s say hypothetically you ran a microwave oven with the door open. The INVERSE SQUARE LAW still applies. Just off the top of my head, if you were more than 6 feet away from the microwave oven you’d be perfectly fine. I know that that was a super simple run down of how a microwave oven works, and some of you will correct what I glossed over, but the point of the reply is to explain the difference between broadcast microwaves (5G) and the microwaves inside a microwave oven. Physics should be mandatory and in all high schools.
Ryan Vigus If your microwave oven is interfering that much with your wifi I recommend buying a better shielded microwave oven or upgrading the router to 5GHZ. And like I stated earlier, even if the microwave oven is leaking a bit, the Inverse Square Law still applies so no harm will occur unless you have your eyeball pressed to the microwave oven door.
We've survived for thousands of years without vaccinations. I have three children and i opted out of vax for my 3rd child and told my wife just to stick with breast milk alone. The result? My third has had zero medical issues, very active and the most intillegent out of all three kids.
"The day science begins to study non-physical phenomena, it will make more progress in one decade, than in all previous centuries of its existence" Nikola Tesla
@@andrei010. ether energy, scalar energy, spirituality, Tesla waves, light energy and other non physical phenomena. Tesla was all about humanity working together without greed, warfare and corruption. He unfortunately was used and discarded after revealing that he wanted every person on this planet to have free energy. Of course the corrupt power structures didn't want that so they stole his ideas and now we have the world we live in, which is fully of corruption and lies, i.e., media, governments, corporations and now co19 plandemic.
@Timothy Sprague Ah yes, the opposition slayer, troll, I have been defeated and must concede victory to you, oh internet stranger who knows my intentions better than I!
For conspiracy theories to work the whole world need to be brainwashed robothumans controlled and made by the government except for the people who believe the theorie LOL
My Nontraditional Life the towers ain’t even support 5g... the people these days rather believe some theorie videos on youtube than our educational system built up of 1000 years of scientific discovery’s.
I really wish you guys talked about the environmental impacts of 5G, which is highly overlooked. Higher energy consumption means higher GHG emissions, therefore causing an even faster increase in the global average temperature. It might not cause physiological impacts, but its use poses a riskier future for younger generations.
Since it's at a higher frequency, it will be using less energy and have less intensity which is why 5g doesn't travel that far. Also, they are making beams for 5g to make it more reliable and more safer to be put in public places
Does anybody know about how it affects to insects? They sense much wider range of the EM spectrum, thus the 5G could alter their perceptions, I guess. And as small they are, the most important in the ecosystem.
From what I've searched, insects' vision can extend in the UV spectrum. And some animals can sense heat which is just infrared, still outside of the 5g spectrum.
@@amentrison2794 Yup, I don't think mmWave's frequency is utilized by many, if any, animals. So supposedly insects would not be affected either. Not sure about more sensitive-skinned animals or plants though, and the slight warming/heating effects cellphone tower waves might have.
Kevin Cole i don’t think the plants have much problem with the slight heating, since there able to survive the temperature differences between night and day
Nothing senses microwaves as such... It isn't practical because it would make things be incredibly low resolution because of the wavelength. Ultra violent they would. But that's above visible light and no where near microwaves
mikecar52 Funny how sci-fi and “conspiracy” continually turn out to be real, only 50 years later! And funny how common sense is usually waved off as conspiracy.
@@ErinLamb79 You and Dawson can read the millions of articles if you want but it just is not true. I guess you 2 are part of the 20% conspiracy believers.
Dawson Davis PVC only releases hydrogenchloride when it’s burning, following your logic any chemical that can releases toxic chemicals in a reaction should be banned. So should we ban wood then because it releases CO? EHS doesn’t have any scientific evidence to support it, it’s likely nocebo
I'm actually worried about 5g disrupting the behaviour of bees. Yup. Sounds insignificant... But I would love to see a study about how 5G may affect the flight pattern and behaviour of bees and related beneficial insects.
Bees aren't important, if eating/food is not important to you. Beyond epidemiological studies, research on a wide range of living things raises further red flags. A 2013 study by the Indian scientists S. Sivani and D. Sudarsanam reports:―Based on current available literature, it is justified to conclude that RF-EMF [electro magnetic fields] radiation exposure can change neurotransmitter functions, blood-brain barrier, morphology, electrophysiology, cellular metabolism, calcium efflux, and gene and protein expression in certain types of cells even at lower intensities.‖13 The article goes on to detail the effects of mobile tower emissions on a wide range of living organisms:―Tops of trees tend to dry up when they directly face the cell tower antennas.. . . A study by the Centre for Environment and Vocational Studies of Punjab University noted that embryos of 50 eggs of house sparrows were damaged after being exposed to mobile tower radiation for 5-30 minutes.. . . In a study on cows and calves on the effects of exposure from mobile phone base stations, it was noted that 32% of calves developed nuclear cataracts, 3.6% severely.‖14 (Page 11) ethics.harvard.edu/files/center-for-ethics/files/capturedagency_alster.pdf
@@bassguitarriff1651 Cars, trucks, and airplanes are more dangerous to us and the environment than 5g is. By far. And yet... people drive them every day. The Karens who are afraid of 5g drive their cars to the protests.
jocaguz18 Maybe try reading the study being open to learning something new since without the first step of assessing something you don’t want to be true as objectively as you can we will dive deeper and deeper into pseudoscience based on bias to a certain fact. Just because something is integral to what many people believe to be the future doesn’t mean it shouldn’t be put to more scrutiny as a precaution given humans have barely scratched the surface of knowledge in this world.
@@bassguitarriff1651 Thanks man. I've started reading the Harvard file, that's a really f*cked up world we live in man. That remind me that line in Men In Black : "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it. Fifteen hundred years ago, everybody knew the Earth was the center of the universe. Five hundred years ago, everybody knew the Earth was flat, and fifteen minutes ago, you knew that humans were alone on this planet. Imagine what you’ll know tomorrow."
if we're talking about the ecosystem then the only thing that can get harm by 5G is probably microorganisms wich stay at the point of receiving and transmitting light for too long and die by the growth of heat assuming that it uses a high voltage output
Conspiracy theories aside, 5G may have certain dangers that are left unexplored. Particularly what he shared about increased brain activity, but not finding correlation with any biological issues. Well, maybe it has other issues we have not yet discovered. I think 4G, given good connectivity, works super fast for most purposes. 5G may be used in certain big research facilities, NASA and such. Do we really need to release it to the general public? I'm not so sure.
@Vox4l Some people have reported problems when living near cell towers. And you try and put your head in a microwave and see what happends if it's so safe
@@Ostebugle 5G has no where near the amplitude of a microwave oven. Did you even study the electromagnetic spectrum in the 5th grade? Frequency is not the only factor when it comes to the effect of a transverse wave, or even a compressional wave for that matter. ElectroBOOM made a great video about it. You should check it out.
legend7 It's best not to get too spooked by jargon specialist words. The sinister-sounding Dihydrogen Monoxide is just water. "Microwaves" simply means "little waves." You don't actually need microwaves to suffer harm if (like with anything else) the dose is high enough. Water is poisonous if you drink enough of it.
@@Sparky-vj2dq microwaves still interfere with your body, doesnt matter how little it is, remember that your cell are also little, in factx microscopic.
Natanael Gonzalez if you wanna go down that path... GUYS TURN OFF YOUR LIGHTS, THE LIGHT WAVES TRAVELLING FROM THEM WILL HIT YOUR BODY. WHAT DO YOU MEAN THE LIGHT WAVES ARE TOO SMALL TO HARM ME? WELL MY CELLS ARE SMALL? CHECKMATE! I don’t know how small your cells are, but I think I know how small some of the cells in your brain are.
Sending this to my conspiracy riddled dad to explain things to him properly. I hope he listens! If anyone you know has suddenly gone bonkers over this please do the same!
unfortunately this will be too scientific for those who believe 5g causes viruses/illness. All the science talk will go over their heads. Usually people like that are swayed by buzz words and sensationalism and discount anything too "sciency" for easier to digest conspiracy theories. It's a lot easier to believe "5g toxic waves harm our cells and causes them to leak molecules and create dangerous virus" than all the info explaining the different kinds of radiation and their lengths and effects and what they are used for.
Increased risk of cancer with higher cellphone use (if it is there) could be attributed to being exposed to an unsanitary cellphone screen for extensive periods of time and to possible carcinogens in the materials the phone is made of. Or people who use their cellphones extensively could live more unhealthy lives in general.
@@onlyallahisworthyofworship5599 True, which is why scientific method does look for causes. Simply drawing a bunch of graphs and telling, "hey, these two variables seem related" isn't enough. There (usually) exists an entire conclusion/discussion section in research papers.
According to some studies, it's not the radiation that's harmful, it's the erratic spikes during transmission which interfere with the heart rhythm. This also applies to 4G. Search for "does cell phone radiation affect heart rhythm"
I'm asking a genuine question here. One argument I've heard pro-5G people use is that 5G antennas are directive (instead of isotropic), meaning that they don't just emit in all directions, but simply emit directly in the direction of the target antenna. So they said "see, no need to be worried, you won't be constantly radiated as is the case with 4G, so it's ok if the we use higher-energy waves, because it's only directed in a very specific direction". Well, there's a 5G antenna 200m from where I leave. I spend easily 14-15 hours per day sitting in front of my computer. Let's suppose my neighbor is constantly using 5G and - bad luck - the beam between the antenna and his receptor goes directly through my head... 15 hours per day. So now the "you won't be constantly radiated so it's ok if we use higher-energy radiations" argument doesn't work anymore. I'd really love someone to prove me wrong because I'm genuinely worried. Thanks. And sorry for my English.
It's still non-ionizing radiation and does not have the physical properties or energy to remove electrons form atoms. Visible light operates further down the electromagnetic spectrum. Stop reading fake news on facebook and start reading basic science.
@@evolicious My concern remains. Yes, it's non-ionizing radiation, but they still heat the tissue they go through (7:30 in the video). That's the principle of microwave ovens. So if my head is 15 hours per day right in the middle of a beam where all the energy is focused, how do I know the heat won't go above the threshold (see the blurred text in the video at the bottom) above which "serious health effects" start to appear? And I didn't read the fact that 5G antennas are directive and not isotropic on facebook or any fake news equivalent, don't worry.
@@DexM47 Plus you could become a target and they can shorten your life span make you go insane it happend ti ne until I went way over and into electromagnetic sense I went magnetic i had 3 phone and a power bank though helicopters were EMP in me from outside having hart attack I called ambulance everyone could feel my hands near theres it was nice for me to finally find out wit was wrong and prove it still can and told WHO and many others I can prove I'm I'm magnet and can pick out anything with magnetic properties tried and tested they know I'm ok I get help for mental heath but soon new thr problem made life style changes charge phone not were I sleep ect I'm doing loads better but get warmed not to spend long on phone
@@DexM47 Microwave ovens use microwave frequencies that are at the precise frequency to begin to flip water molecules, thus heating them up. 5g does not use that frequency so it will only heat up your skin, not your brain.
So in the end you're telling us that people have a right to be concerned unless we trust our government to do the right thing which history shows they almost never do the right thing
The government would never lie and the media will always tell 100% truth and corporations are our friends. Please don't ever question any of those institutions, just do as you're told and let other people think for you because they know what's best for us.
I'm reading them, but I have questions about 5G affecting existing WiFi infrastructure (since 2.5-5 GHz) ... also, I think I read a paper that 6 GHz is the limit beyond which insects, especially bees can feel severe discomfort, which in the long term would spell disaster, as we already know courtesy their decline due to other. Hence, while these conspiracy theories are a curse, I do believe it might help in hiding actual problems, if any. Could anyone clarify please?
5G is just the name, it doesnt operate on 5GHz. 5G=5th generation. Thus also meaning 6G (when and if it comes) wont have to operate on 6GHz. Also, I dont think 6GHz is the limit seeing as daylight is still more potent to harm tissue and I dont see everyone trying to ban the sun.
Please educate yourselves and keep an open mind. Science does not understand the extent of the human body! ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-YFR5EtO_zdM.html
@Orpheas Malliamanis I am considering buying shares in companies who produce personal body cams and microphones. And just because there are other things more dangerous than cars, I'm not going to sleep on the high way for that reason.
So far we had: 1. Lightbulbs 2. Radio 3. Tv 4. Microwaves 5. Smart phones 6. Wifi 7. 3g 8. 4g And now 9, 5g. This is nothing new, we have been complaining about these frequencies since the lightbulb was invented.
@Ernesto Saavedra is that why the population grew from 3 billion in 1960 to 7,6 billion today ....because diseases r running amok???? .....diseases r constantly being eradicated ....and all aspects of healthcare and society r constantly advancing.... ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-yCm9Ng0bbEQ.html ...... leapsmag.com/steven-pinker-data-shows-that-life-today-is-better-than-ever/
@Ernesto Saavedra one thing i do agree and makes things plausible is the effect of these frequencies on the brain. The brain uses signal to communicate with other areas of the mind/body, since we dont fully understand these effect, who knows, it might be plausable for these outside frequencies to disrupt these communication and cause unknown results.
@Ernesto Saavedra see the links in my original comment..... it is an undeniable fact that society is mostly constantly improving in various ways...... also use Google www.google.com/search?hl=en-US&source=android-browser&ei=Zce_XuudFYHCgQas9YSYAg&q=list+of+eradicated+or+declining+diseases&oq=list+of+eradicated+or+declining+diseases&gs_lcp=CgZwc3ktYWIQAzoECAAQDToECCEQClC2owFY974BYLbTAWgAcAB4AIABpwOIAbsUkgEJMC44LjIuMi4xmAEAoAEBqgEHZ3dzLXdpeg&sclient=psy-ab&ved=0ahUKEwir5KiCnbjpAhUBYcAKHaw6ASMQ4dUDCAs&uact=5
I think it’s smart to step up and acknowledge that we trust the current science but that we should also be willing to change our view as new scientific studies are done.
@@minecraftparkourredditstories You obviously did not even bother to read my post before replying. Many doctors do not feel this technology is safe, that is a scientific fact. The only scientific fact is that there's no consensus that this technology is safe.
@@ufoaa5729 So you accept how they feel? Lol the people who design these technologies know what they're doing at this rate you might as well be afraid of any kind of radiation which is ridiculous
@@minecraftparkourredditstories Your reading comprehension level needs some work. The scientists and doctors warning of the dangers know what they are talking about and are far more qualified to assess the health risks of the technology, more than the engineers who designed it. Believe what you want, you're entitled to your own opinion.
Apparently I live in the country with the most expensive wfi in the world; I'm not sure that's true, but we're paying 4X more than it cost to heat the house in winter. For those of us who are not aspiring long-range surgeons, when can we expect _cheaper_ service?
I'm sorry that your country is so cruel about the pricing, that's so unnecessary. Sadly the only way to get cheaper services is for companies to be forced to lower their price which is typically through competition...which means no monopolies.
ICNIRP (transnational regulatory body) guidelines were last updated in the 1990s and are predicated on the assumption that harm can only occur through thermal effects. Since the 90s there have been thousands of peer-reviewed scientific studies that show harm from non-thermal effects, such as DNA damage, cancer, blood-brain barrier permeation, immune system problems, neurodegenerative diseases and widespread neurological/neuropsychiatric effects such as sleep disturbances, cognitive and memory problems, headaches, heart palpitations and other cardiovascular and auditory effects, many of which have now reached record levels. Since 2018, thousands of medical doctors, engineers and scientists have signed an international appeal demanding a moratorium on 5G rollout until it is proven to be safe. It's also worth noting that ICNIRP is largely funded by the telecoms industry, which raises concerns over conflicts of interest. This may address ICNIRP's reluctance to update the regulations. Signatories of the appeal are helpfully listed by profession and by country (the scientists' signatories alone is 111 pages long) See: www.5gspaceappeal.org/the-appeal See also: ehtrust.org/science/research-on-wireless-health-effects/ ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-h4TdY344Now.html (Former President of Microsoft, Canada) mdsafetech.org/5g-telecommunications-science/
@Élégante personné i read through the first website and even read on another study linked in this website and now it just made me confused. It doesn't seem to be a "Karen" thing
I would say this video is about to get a lot of dislikes, but remembered people who believe in the 5G conspiracies don’t really want to watch scientific videos
A 4 and 5G shield is available for your phone to protect you and your family members on their phones, from harmful 5G Radiation at your phone. see it here at 5gcooksyou.com
If the fastest 5g is easily blocked and can't be transmitted very well, why even bother using it? I mean 2 GB/s sounds nice, but what does that matter when we can't use it effectivly
@C0gitoZ33 Droid As crazy as what you just wrote sounds, I've read similar accounts from credible sources to just about everything you mentioned. They are not installing this technology so we can download porn faster. The surveillance/privacy issues aren't even getting mentioned.
@C0gitoZ33 Droid But my question was: How will we use this tech effectivly, so that nothing blocks our internet and we still get the high end fast wi fi?
The downside of this technology is that you have to install more towers to get real coverage, as explained in the video, which cost a lot of money and take a lot of time. The uses of 5G go beyond the daily use of cellphones and social media helping in fields like AI or medicine
The thing is that 5G studies in the real world haven't been made; It's new technology; we need at least years to precisely calculate and analyze data about health effects.
"The thing is that 5G studies in the real world haven't been made" Because 5g is not a new technology, and is just the same RF we have been using for decades already. Stop reading Karen's facebook posts and start leaning some basic science. Start with the electromagnetic spectrum for starters that completely disproves this ridiculous theory about RF.
Radiation at the 5G frequency has existed since before even life on Earth. The technology to produce radiation isn't new. The only new piece about 5G is the application of 5G for the use of transmitting data
People who dislike: I purposely reject common facts and choose to look at specific websites and ignore everything else to that I can maintain my information bubble and stay misinformed
Mortality rates for those under 50 are negligible and the younger the person the lower the morality rate (covid is even less severe than influenza for young people). Stop panicking please and address the other side of the equation which is the harm in lives and suffering from this lockdown
@@Medhead101 um... u realize that even if you have mild to no symptoms you can still spread it to immunocompromised people. yes, the lockdown has been negatively effecting people's livelihoods but they are saving lives nonetheless. many states that are reopening aren't even meeting the white house guidelines for reopening. TLDR: chill out I'm not an epidemiologist I'm just a guy who made a joke
Ouch, I was seriously hoping someone would debunk these theories with hard data. Is there not going to be 7000 satellites? Has deorbit been tested? Are there five pieces minimum for each that survive reentry? Has anyone other than the FCC approved this? Will others launch 7000 or more satellites? These seem like valid concerns, not just the sky is falling. If I'm wrong I will be glad. Correct me with information not just insults.
We are electrical beings, our cells communicate via low level electrical frequencies. I have been using Scenar therapies for years: SCENAR treatment is to stimulate the body’s own healing powers by emitting an electromagnetic signal which is almost identical to the human nerve signal. This signal travels along special types of nerve fibers to the brain, which results in the production of neuropeptides which rapidly advance healing. When applied to the point of pain, the brain also releases endorphins, the body’s own powerful pain relieving substances. This biofeedback is what distinguishes it from TENS machines and other electrical therapies. These treatments in low level electricity (TENS, SCENAR, COSMODIC, SCALAR) and low level lasers using frequencies has been around for a few decades now and demonstrates how the human body can react positively to extremely low levels and frequencies. Here is a link about the use of lasers to regrow teeth in rats. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-en79wtbytvk.html This field of electrical medicine has demonstrated to me how low and high frequencies have different biological effects both positive and negative. In regards to emf radiation and the pulsed here is a link of over 500 'Independent studies' demonstrating the negative effectives: www.diagnose-funk.org (If you click this link it will come up in German however if you search the name of the website and enter you will be given the option for the text to be translated into English). Also are you aware that: New York, NY, July 22, 2019. The Advisors to the International EMF Scientist Appeal, representing 248 scientists from 42 nations, have resubmitted The Appeal to the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) Executive Director, Inger Andersen, requesting the UNEP reassess the potential biological impacts of next generation 4G and 5G telecommunication technologies to plants, animals and humans. There is particular urgency at this time as new antennas will be densely located throughout residential neighborhoods using much higher frequencies, with greater biologically disruptive pulsations, more dangerous signaling characteristics, plus transmitting equipment on, and inside, homes and buildings. The Advisors to The Appeal recommend UNEP seriously weigh heavily the findings of the independent, non-industry associated EMF science The Advisors to the International EMF Scientist Appeal - Annie Sasco, MD, Dr.PH., Henry Lai, Ph.D., Joel Moskowitz, PhD., Ronald Melnick, Ph.D. and Magda Havas, Ph.D., call upon the UNEP to be a strong voice for the total environment of the planet, and an effective catalyst within the United Nations with regards to the biological and health effects of electromagnetic pollution. REF: www.emfscientist.org If you like to read more studies on emf radiation and there harmful effects here is another database that is listed in categories of possible evidence to strong evidence. www.powerwatch.org.uk/science/studies.asp Based on past mistakes of human history with cigarettes being prescribed by doctors, heroin used as cough medicine, cocaine in coca cola, x-rays used commercially in shoe shops, asbestos as a building material, thalidomide: duckduckgo.com/?q=thalidomide+babies&atb=v220-3_a&iax=images&ia=images. It is in my opinion to exercise with caution and we need independent studies done before rolling out 5G across the whole world.
Thanks , the other guy just made fun of me. I'm all for caution with EMF. This is another mess entirely. Now it's up to 20,000 satellites. Plus a I'm anyone else can launch their batch cause we started it. Tons of soon to be trash in orbit. Plan is to burn up all that electronics, batteries and metal in our atmosphere. Why should I pay to smog my car? Then there's also the ground strikes. 5 times 20,000. Thanks for the EMF info, lost my wife to Cancer. They told us not to worry about the high power lines. So yeah. Could do without 5g.
@@jeffarcher400 I'm sorry for the loss of your wife. Regarding Cancer its a controversial topic, despite that I like to look for answers and shop around when it comes to health care solutions. The Hippocrates Health Institute. The Gerson Therapy. Ozone therapy. These might be things you may or may not want to look into.
@@jeffarcher400 yes, they are concerns to me too. If you look at the world economic forum you will see there plans for the future the influential elites / NWO intends for our world will move to for what they call sustainable.
@@mohanbennett6953 ; Appreciate you enlightening people with Facts. We've been inundated with propaganda from the MSM and shills,. Information from experts in the field has figuratively been put on the back shelf or outright deleted. You are not alone brother, keep the faith. FTNWO
The truth is, we don't fully understand what the health implications are for millimeter wave bands. It was never seriously considered for general usage until now, because the obvious problem with using radio in these bands is that it doesn't penitrate buildings/trees/inanimate objects very well, which means that cell towers and phones will have to crank up transmitter power to very high levels for the system to work. It's estimated that a usable 5G network on the proposed frequencies of US carriers will require towers 300 meters apart in urban areas, and will be virtually unusable in the centers of buildings! I think that it's outrageous that shareholders are willing to pay into this. Further, the FCC should have required a fairly detailed study by a neutral party on potential health effects on human beings exposed to 5G radiation before approving use on millimeter wave bands. It was railroad tracked through the FCC.
Nothing says the power has to be cranked up, that'd make it a microwave. (A bad one but one nonetheless.) They're placing a ton of them around to get _THROUGH_ the low distance capability. (I'm sorry for that pun.) As for the radiation....it's non-ionising, that's literally all you need to know. Either radiation ionises you or carries enough energy to heat you up, this won't be able to do either.
@@TheGreatBackUpVIDEOS not necessarily. EM radiation is capable of interfering with chemical processes. Electricity does that quite handily in the human body (fatally with enough current in the right place!). There's still lots we don't understand about human exposure to RF. The FCC came up with the E-RFR guidelines in the 1980's when the effects of broadcast frequencies were actually studied by the medical community...
Often times when a person brings up health risks associated with low-intensity rf-emfs, it's pointed out that visible light is higher in frequency and power density than what is used for telecommunication and other wireless technologies, and so low intensity rf-emfs are naturally harmless. This line of reasoning ignores the fact that Iife evolved within the optical frequency range of the emf spectrum, so there's a long history of adaptation to it, first of all. The rf-emfs used in telecommunication and other wireless tech, 5G included, are not typically in it the natural electromagnetic background exposure, least not to any large extent. They are generally absorbed in the upper atmosphere, see Influence of High-frequency Electromagnetic Radiation at Non-thermal Intensities on the Human body @ img1.wsimg.com/blobby/go/cbc7c8bd-ed32-4485-adfb-dbb6ab97e62f/downloads/influence_of_high_frequency_electromagnetic_ra.pdf?ver=1586294670171 For example, "levels of exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation around the 1 GHz frequency band, which is mostly used for modern wireless communications, have increased from extremely low natural levels by about 10¹⁸ times" - see Planetary electromagnetic pollution: it is time to assess its impact @ www.thelancet.com/pdfs/journals/lanplh/PIIS2542-5196(18)30221-3.pdf The notion that only power density has a role in the possible harm induced by non-ionizing emfs is scientifically erroneous. The mechanisms involved aren't as well understood as in the case for damage due to high power, thermal effects, and that's pushed the issue further and further back. Nonetheless, adverse as well as beneficial effects from low intensity rf-emfs have been reported in the literature for decades, see the U.S. Army Medical Intelligence and Information Agency, Office of the Surgeon General report, published in 1976 @ www.emfanalysis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Defense-Intelligence-Agency-1976-Report-on-Biological-Effects-of-EMF.pdf In addition, the artificial nature of man-made rf-emfs add to their biological activity, and in adverse ways, see Polarization: A Key Difference between Man-made and Natural Electromagnetic Fields, in regard to Biological Activity img1.wsimg.com/blobby/go/cbc7c8bd-ed32-4485-adfb-dbb6ab97e62f/downloads/srep14914-1.pdf?ver=1586294670170 Some of the most adverse response dependent aspects of rf-emfs is their pulsation and other characteristics, which are often left out of "safety" studies because they make precise measurements more difficult, see Real versus Simulated Mobile Phone Exposures in Experimental Studies @ img1.wsimg.com/blobby/go/cbc7c8bd-ed32-4485-adfb-dbb6ab97e62f/downloads/PanagCellPhone2015.pdf?ver=1586294670171 & Adverse health effects of 5G mobile networking technology under real-life conditions @ img1.wsimg.com/blobby/go/cbc7c8bd-ed32-4485-adfb-dbb6ab97e62f/downloads/1-s2.0-S037842742030028X-main.pdf?ver=1586294670171 Furthermore, to try judge whether or not non-ionizing emfs are dangerous merely by the same set of criteria by which ionizing radiation is known to be harmful is inappropriate - as is spelled out in this Letter to the Editor "When theory and observation collide: Can non-ionizing radiation cause cancer?" @ img1.wsimg.com/blobby/go/cbc7c8bd-ed32-4485-adfb-dbb6ab97e62f/downloads/2017_HavasEnvPoltheoryvsobservation.pdf?ver=1586294670171 Also see, Thermal and non-thermal health effects of low intensity non-ionizing radiation: An international perspective @ ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/12103008105187/nonionizing%20radiation%20international%20perspective%20Belpomme%20Hardell%20Carpenter%202018.pdf & Electromagnetic Radiation Due to Cellular, Wi-Fi and Bluetooth Technologies: How Safe Are We? @ img1.wsimg.com/blobby/go/cbc7c8bd-ed32-4485-adfb-dbb6ab97e62f/downloads/09016183.pdf?ver=1586294670171 & List of 142 Reviews on Non-thermal Effects of Microwave/Intermediate Frequency EMFs @ www.ehtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/142-Reviews-Pall-PhD.pdf A revolving door has been used to describe the FCC's relationship with insiders within the telecommunication industry, see Captured Agency, How the Federal Communications Commission Is Dominated by the Industries It Presumably Regulates ethics.harvard.edu/files/center-for-ethics/files/capturedagency_alster.pdf Conflicts of interest have complicated the issue of guideline standards and government policy when it comes to protecting against non-thermal adverse health risks, see Conflicts of Interest and Misleading Statements in Official Reports about the Health Consequences of Radiofrequency Radiation and Some New Measurements of Exposure Levels @ www.researchgate.net/publication/333046473_Conflicts_of_Interest_and_Misleading_Statements_in_Official_Reports_about_the_Health_Consequences_of_Radiofrequency_Radiation_and_Some_New_Measurements_of_Exposure_Levels/fulltext/5cd98537458515712ea76c3b/Conflicts-of-Interest-and-Misleading-Statements-in-Official-Reports-about-the-Health-Consequences-of-Radiofrequency-Radiation-and-Some-New-Measurements-of-Exposure-Levels.pdf Scientific investigation into the mechanisms involved with non-thermal biological effects are ongoing and some theories with varying evidence have been put forward, see Electromagnetic field effects on cells of the immune system: The role of calcium signaling @ www.researchgate.net/profile/Jan_Walleczek/publication/235945088_Electromagnetic_field_effects_on_cells_of_the_immune_system_The_role_of_calcium_signaling/links/56fb145308ae8239f6dad9d0/Electromagnetic-field-effects-on-cells-of-the-immune-system-The-role-of-calcium-signaling.pdf & Oxidative mechanisms of biological activity of low-intensity radiofrequency radiation @ www.researchgate.net/profile/Igor_Yakymenko/publication/279863242_Oxidative_mechanisms_of_biological_activity_of_low-intensity_radiofrequency_radiation/links/55af77e308aea5b9dd7a22c6/Oxidative-mechanisms-of-biological-activity-of-low-intensity-radiofrequency-radiation.pdf & Electromagnetic fields may act via calcineurin inhibition to suppress immunity, thereby increasing risk for opportunistic infection: Conceivable mechanisms of action @ www.researchgate.net/profile/Paul_Doyon/publication/318112392_Electromagnetic_fields_may_act_via_calcineurin_inhibition_to_suppress_immunity_thereby_increasing_risk_for_opportunistic_infection_Conceivable_mechanisms_of_action/links/5a545ef8aca2725638cb850e/Electromagnetic-fields-may-act-via-calcineurin-inhibition-to-suppress-immunity-thereby-increasing-risk-for-opportunistic-infection-Conceivable-mechanisms-of-action.pdf & Electromagnetic fields may act directly on DNA @ www.researchgate.net/publication/12765003_Electromagnetic_fields_may_act_directly_on_DNA & ‘Non thermal effects and mechanisms of interaction between EMF and living matter: a selected Summary’ @ www.icems.eu/papers/SummaryGuilianifeb25th.pdf In addition, here's 197 bodies of scientific evidence demonstrating the risks associated with rf-emfs: Eight Repeatedly Documented Findings Each Show that EMF Safety Guidelines Do Not Predict Biological Effects and Are, Therefore Fraudulent @ img1.wsimg.com/blobby/go/cbc7c8bd-ed32-4485-adfb-dbb6ab97e62f/downloads/1r92Ai2UfVpwh7dkI7sy5tvqypR1Hr996.pdf?ver=1586294670125 Defenders of the FCC, the groups responsible for setting the guidelines to exposure, and their "thermal-only" hypotheses for biological harm done by low intensity rf-emfs, often proclaim the weight of scientific evidence is on their side, as is the consensus of scientists in the area; hopefully you now have a sense of just how questionable, at best, their confidence ought to be. Furthermore, there isn't a consensus regarding the risks associated with low-intensity rf-emfs. In fact, there's an international appeal of emf scientists from countries all around the world who've called for a moratorium on 5G deployment. As of October 15, 2019, 252 EMF scientists from 43 nations have signed the [Appeal](emfscientist.org/). That's more emf scientists than are involved in any of the guideline setting institutions responsible for exposure limits. This shows that the debate/discussion on the dangers associated with low intensity rf-emfs is far from over, and provides sufficient evidence for the precautionary approach to be used and a 5G moratorium enacted (see Towards 5G communication systems: are there health implications? @ www.elektrosmog.voxo.eu/video/Towards%205G%20-%20Potential%20Health%20Effects.pdf) - along with minimizing unnecessary exposure and instead relying on wired connections when possible. Join the debate/discussion @ www.reddit.com/r/5GDebate?
@@roarv make sure you actually take the time to read the studies being linked and don't just look at the titles. I'm not saying that to lead you to any particular conclusion and I plan on doing the same, but it's important to remember that just because all of these titles included big words doesn't mean they're accurate.
Pandora Ephraim, thanks for the information, the precautionary principle is being ignored. There is an experiment going on with 5G and we are the lab rats. Not to mention the invasion of privacy and the possible use of the technology as aweapon - "Active Denial".
but you never mentioned the long term effects of 5g on the body. sure maybe it's not harmful in the doses they used in the test, but what about lifelong, constant exposure?
Jen Charme there has been life on earth for billions of years, why would microwaves be dangerous just now. The fact that there’s life on this plant it self is evidence for its safety
Then your phone is dangerous too as it contains radiation. Should we take into account the long term effects of phones now too? Nobody views phones as dangerous, so why 5G?
@@amnesiaclover2001 I view phones as dangerous. there's a huge surge in abnormalities in births, cancer, etc since carrying a phone on you has become mainstream. yes I'm still going to carry it around with me because in the modern world it's hard not to, but I still want to be aware and consider all the facts
@@jencharme4197 well... The thing is, it's NOT dangerous. It's not ionizing radiation. So it doesn't pose any danger. Ionizing radiation can cause oxidative stress. The radiation from your phone and 5G is NOT ionizing, and as such cannot harm you. I'm sure that surge in abnormalities in births is a coincidence. The same thing with cancer. And the sun radiates more than your phone and 5G. And the sun has been there since the beginning of life on earth. It does not pose a threat either. So why phones and 5G? Do you view the sun as too dangerous? You might as well stay inside for the rest of your life because the sun is 'dangerous'. It's not. And neither are 5G and phones.
@@amnesiaclover2001 I do view the sun as dangerous, I wear sunscreen every day to protect myself to the best of my abilities! but this is the type of answer I was looking for, I was genuinely curious so thanks for taking the time to respond! If anyone else has anything to add id love to hear your thoughts as well
Hey Helena, ever been scared of a light bulb in your house. If not you shouldn't be scared of 5G because light is more armfull than mm wave frequencies
If the child knows better then it should be fine and given how most of us are tech support for our folk...well, just in case you should make sure they know not to take everyone's word for it but to rely on Google to help verify knowledge. In the case of "you can't trust the government to not censor stuff" that leaves you in a situation where the only thing you can do is test it yourself (Good luck with THAT one) or just take the word of authority figure who said don't trust others which leaves you right back where you started of "the truth can be whatever I want it to be".
@@taylorwinslow8015 Honestly, the search engines don't do much, some filter a few results but usually you can find the same stuff. I could definitely spend a day looking on duckduckgo instead but I guarantee you I won't find this rabbit hole you people seem to have fallen down into. (If anything, I find Google filters less results)
@@taylorwinslow8015 Or it is difficult to convince people because you think something weaker than light can harm you. I wasn't dropped on my head as a child, sorry. You also seem to think that the entire world agreed at once that a virus is real even though they can't agree not to shoot each other and it's all a planned conspiracy to...what, make you practice better hygiene? PS: Please use the enter key to space out your messages even a TINY bit, your comment is a nightmare to read.
That's what you got from this video? I know reading comprehension can be surprisingly low in some literate people, but this is fairly easy to follow video.
You shouldn't feel comfortable, especially since he ignored all of the research that has been done and the warnings of the health risks associated with this technology.
I noticed that Marcus Brownlee is talking about speeds of 50 Megabyte per second (MBps) to 2 Gigabyte (GBps) per second... I can't help but bring up that he is off by a factor of 8 as the speeds are in Mbps (Megabit per second) and Gbps (Gigabit per second).
I don't think you can safely trust the agencies that are suppose to regulate it. There is so much conflict of interest with government agencies and the industry they're suppose to regulate. Here are a few excerpts and examples from an article. In that time the Cellular Telecommunications & Internet Association (CTIA)- an organization whose leadership has maintained a revolving door relationship with the U.S. Federal Communication Commission - has collaborated on or guided regulatory policy related to not only 5G, but the roll out of cell phones and other digital technology. The CTIA annually lobbies for the industry to the tune of millions of dollars, making them one of the most powerful telecom lobby groups. ………. In that time the Cellular Telecommunications & Internet Association - an organization whose leadership has maintained a revolving door relationship with the U.S. Federal Communication Commission - has collaborated on or guided regulatory policy related to not only 5G, but the roll out of cell phones and other digital technology. The CTIA annually lobbies for the industry to the tune of millions of dollars, making them one of the most powerful telecom lobby groups. …… For example, at the time of the report’s release, the Chairman of the FCC was Tom Wheeler, a man with deep ties to the wireless industry. In 2013, Wheeler was nominated as FCC chairman by former President Barack Obama after raising more than $700,000 for his presidential campaigns. Wheeler led the two most powerful industry lobbying groups: The National Cable & Telecommunications Association (NCTA) and the CTIA. In 20, Wheeler was also the head of the FCC during the debate around Net Neutrality. Ajit Pai, current chairman of the FCC, is another example of this revolving door relationship. Pai is an attorney who served as Associate General Counsel at Verizon Communications Inc. between 2001 and 2003, where he handled competition and regulatory matters. Pai was appointed to the FCC by Barack Obama in 2012 and then made FCC Chairman by Donald Trump in January 2017. In February, Pai admitted that the FCC failed to protect Americans’ privacy after it was revealed that at least two companies were gaining access to Americans’ private data and selling it to law enforcement. Pai called for a fine of over $200 million on AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile, and Sprint. “This FCC will not tolerate phone companies putting Americans’ privacy at risk,” Pai stated when announcing the fine. FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr is yet another example of a government official working closely with industry and maintaining relationships which clearly present conflicts of interest. Carr is credited with accelerating the 5G build out. Prior to joining the FCC, Carr worked as an attorney at Wiley Rein where his clients were Verizon, AT&T, Centurylink, and CTIA. The Wiley Rein law firm is a hotbed of activity for former government officials and industry regulars. One of the founders of the law firm is Richard Wiley, himself a Former FCC Chairman. According to Open Secrets, in the first four months of 2020 the Wiley Rein law firm has been retained by several telecoms, including AT&T for $80,000, the CTIA for $50,000, and Verizon for $30,000. For the last 15 years the law firm has spent at least $2 million dollars lobbying for their clients. Open Secrets also shows the CTIA has spent $3 million on their own lobbying efforts. On September 30, 2019, Commissioner Carr and other FCC officials were in Houston to discuss the future of 5G. I interviewed Commissioner Carr about the concerns regarding his connections with the wireless industry, as well as the implications of the Captured Agency report released by Harvard’s School of Ethics. Unfortunately, Mr Carr had no interest in addressing these questions and refused to answer my questions and only stated, “We’re excited about the 5G build out and working with local leaders.” The silence from FCC officials on the charges of corrupted regulators and ignored studies is simply another facet of the relationship between industry and government. Again, the strongest influence over the U.S. regulatory agencies can be traced to the Cellular Telecommunications & Internet Association. www.mintpressnews.com/big-wireless-lobbied-5g-data-collection-surveillance/267355/
Both microwave oven and WiFi routers are working at 2.4GHz. One of these two works at 800W and boil water molecules. Do we know what would be the the 5G emision power for each frequency?
Sad day when foolish people have to much to say..... telecom companies need to do testing for peer review. They have not so they must stop the rollout.
My understanding of cancer is that it’s caused by oxidative stress, which does cause DNA damage. So the question is, does 5G cause oxidative stress? Which this video did not cover
Nathan oxidative stress can be a result of ionizing, I e creating free radicals. However microwave radiation is not energetic enough to ionize atoms, and thus case oxidative stress due to the radicals
Blitzer561 Kad help me understand your point. So are you saying oxidative stress in the body can only happen from frequencies that are ionizing? Oxidative stress is something that is constantly happening in the body, but when it’s excessive and localized is when it’s an issue. When it’s non ionizing doesn’t mean that it can’t increase oxidative stress In the body
Northstarrr 5G waves can get past the skin....the statement I just made is just a belief, like the one you made. The original question I asked is quite simple: does 5G increase oxidative stress. It seems no one knows what I’m talking about. Well, oxidative stress can be increased by simple things like running, nutrient deficiencies, stress, and oh yeah being alive! So you’re still saying that we become in contact with these waves. So I ask again, does 5G increase oxidative stress In the body?
For someone new now coming into this topic and information, and reading for myself, I don’t trust this in regards to safety. This has something to do with the fact that 36 seconds into the video the guy in white shirt was already hinting with weird face gestures about the opposing theory, and name calling ( calling it “ pretty wild” and made faces in conjunction with it), BEFORE even providing any scientific evidence to the contrary. By doing so, he signified his stance on the topic as if it is absolute, then he switches his stance at the 12:40 mark stating “ that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t be skeptical of technological advances”. Why should anyone be skeptical if the available science is one hundred percent clear about its safety? Because it appears to me that it is not. If the opposing side’s theory is “pretty wild” there shouldn’t be any reason why anyone would be skeptical. Why? Because their stance is PRETTY WILD ( 👈🏾 that’s a big accusation). Then he attempts to reel the viewer back in by stating they were skeptical too, THEN, name drops a Harvard professor to create a halo effect to give the notion of not to worry, Harvard professors are trustworthy and intelligent, when a Harvard professor was just recently arrested for having illegal ties to China. Yeah, Harvard is not so trust worthy. So Harvard’s name drop has no bearing on swaying me, and it isn’t the beacon of truth and light right now. My philosophy professor in college who was teaching my class how to debate taught us if name calling starts, especially in the beginning, it is a sign, (or tactic) that the opposing side is attempting to condition people to their ideology, it also can be a sign of fear of the opposing side. It can also indicate frustration or defeat, and lastly, it can also indicate the side that’s name calling is either being coerced, or paid to promote a specific agenda, or ideology🤔. When in reality, the truth and facts require no conditioning or name calling, it can speak for itself, CLEARLY, in a FAIR and OPEN market. Major red flag for me. He should’ve been impartial and unbiased, and let the TRUTHFUL science speak for itself, instead of attempting to shame the other side, ESPECIALLY in the beginning. After reading the Scientific American article “ We have no reason to believe 5G is safe, and going through the ninety five page PDF of studies, I would be extremely wary about this 5G, and it’s safety. The choice is yours. Also, I notice at the 11:51 mark the guy in the Black shirt stated if you’re “interested in conspiracy theories and the science on why they work so well, we actually have a video all about that. ” giving the notion that conspiracy theories are false, and completely made up. If you are unbiased, impartial, TRULY scientific, AND just, how come you don’t have a video about conspiracy theories that actually came to fruition then🤔? To give people a balanced and fair opinion. VERY interesting, I’m just saying😏🤷🏾♂️. I did not name call or mud sling any side of this topic, and I didn’t make any attempts to condition anyone. All I did was assess the information in front of me, and come to a logical conclusion using deductive reasoning. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-tz1NsAQDto0.html
@@kaygrace5250 i meant technically your not wrong since the human body can do fine without vaccines just keep a safe distance. However the ccp is going in now like full-blown trying to gain control of the world so its best if you just dont trust the government for now(that means pretty much every country rn).
Of course, there has never been an instance of corporation misleading people or hiding information. I'm going to go out for a cigarette before doing some asbestos removal.
No. Basically, 5G doesn't affect the body. Visible light is much more high-energy than 5G, so if you aren't afraid of light you shouldn't be afraid of any kind of cell phone radiation.
@@nolin132 , I got it. We should listen to your opinion and ignore the hundreds of doctors and scientist that have studied the technology and have warned us of the dangers. No offense William but I'll listen to the scientists and doctors. There are no long term studies that conclude 5G is safe, but there are numerous studies that speak/warn about the dangers. ******************************************* The 5G Appeal was prepared in 2017 by - 372 - scientists and doctors who are urgently calling for the EU to halt the roll out of 5G due to serious potential health effects from this new technology. As of May 8, 2020, 372 scientists and medical doctors have signed The 5G Appeal. Should we ignore them ? www.5gappeal.eu/about/ ********************************** ***** Is 5G Worth the Risks? countercurrents.org/2019/05/is-5g-worth-the-risks-iishana-artra/ ******************************************* The Danger of 5G: 5th Generation Cellular Technology Might Be a Threat to Public Health interestingengineering.com/the-danger-of-5g-5th-generation-cellular-technology-might-be-a-threat-to-public-health ******************************************* U.S. Sen. Blumenthal criticizes the FCC & FDA for inadequate answers on outstanding public health questions Wireless carriers concede they are not aware of any independent scientific studies on safety of 5G technologies www.blumenthal.senate.gov/newsroom/press/release/at-senate-commerce-hearing-blumenthal-raises-concerns-on-5g-wireless-technologys-potential-health-risks
@@bassguitarriff1651 "There are no long term studies that prove 5G is safe" What a disingenuous argument. There aren't any long term studies AT ALL. Because 5G is a NEW TECHNOLOGY. Do you refuse to buy the latest model of microwave because no long term studies have been done on that specific model? I'll repeat this again. Take light. When you lower the energy of light, you get infrared. When you lower it again, you get 5G. It is not bad for you. Are you concerned about 4G too? Radio waves? It's fundamentally the same concept. People like you have been scaremongering about the latest technology since the dawn of time. You link to random petitions, I'll link to the FDA: "there is no consistent or credible scientific evidence of health problems caused by the exposure to radio frequency energy emitted by cell phones" "No New implications for 5G" www.fda.gov/radiation-emitting-products/cell-phones/scientific-evidence-cell-phone-safety
@@nolin132 Do you choose to ignore the fact that there is a very busy revolving door with the FDA and the pharmaceutical industry, also a revolving door withe the FDA and monsanto, voted the worlds most hated corporation multiple times. Do you see the likely probability that there is a huge conflict of interest with the FDA and the telecom industry.
There is so much conflict of interest with government agencies and the industry they're suppose to regulate. Here are a few excerpts and examples from an article. In that time the Cellular Telecommunications & Internet Association (CTIA)- an organization whose leadership has maintained a revolving door relationship with the U.S. Federal Communication Commission - has collaborated on or guided regulatory policy related to not only 5G, but the roll out of cell phones and other digital technology. The CTIA annually lobbies for the industry to the tune of millions of dollars, making them one of the most powerful telecom lobby groups. ………. In that time the Cellular Telecommunications & Internet Association - an organization whose leadership has maintained a revolving door relationship with the U.S. Federal Communication Commission - has collaborated on or guided regulatory policy related to not only 5G, but the roll out of cell phones and other digital technology. The CTIA annually lobbies for the industry to the tune of millions of dollars, making them one of the most powerful telecom lobby groups. …… For example, at the time of the report’s release, the Chairman of the FCC was Tom Wheeler, a man with deep ties to the wireless industry. In 2013, Wheeler was nominated as FCC chairman by former President Barack Obama after raising more than $700,000 for his presidential campaigns. Wheeler led the two most powerful industry lobbying groups: The National Cable & Telecommunications Association (NCTA) and the CTIA. In 20, Wheeler was also the head of the FCC during the debate around Net Neutrality. Ajit Pai, current chairman of the FCC, is another example of this revolving door relationship. Pai is an attorney who served as Associate General Counsel at Verizon Communications Inc. between 2001 and 2003, where he handled competition and regulatory matters. Pai was appointed to the FCC by Barack Obama in 2012 and then made FCC Chairman by Donald Trump in January 2017. In February, Pai admitted that the FCC failed to protect Americans’ privacy after it was revealed that at least two companies were gaining access to Americans’ private data and selling it to law enforcement. Pai called for a fine of over $200 million on AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile, and Sprint. “This FCC will not tolerate phone companies putting Americans’ privacy at risk,” Pai stated when announcing the fine. FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr is yet another example of a government official working closely with industry and maintaining relationships which clearly present conflicts of interest. Carr is credited with accelerating the 5G build out. Prior to joining the FCC, Carr worked as an attorney at Wiley Rein where his clients were Verizon, AT&T, Centurylink, and CTIA. The Wiley Rein law firm is a hotbed of activity for former government officials and industry regulars. One of the founders of the law firm is Richard Wiley, himself a Former FCC Chairman. According to Open Secrets, in the first four months of 2020 the Wiley Rein law firm has been retained by several telecoms, including AT&T for $80,000, the CTIA for $50,000, and Verizon for $30,000. For the last 15 years the law firm has spent at least $2 million dollars lobbying for their clients. Open Secrets also shows the CTIA has spent $3 million on their own lobbying efforts. On September 30, 2019, Commissioner Carr and other FCC officials were in Houston to discuss the future of 5G. I interviewed Commissioner Carr about the concerns regarding his connections with the wireless industry, as well as the implications of the Captured Agency report released by Harvard’s School of Ethics. Unfortunately, Mr Carr had no interest in addressing these questions and refused to answer my questions and only stated, “We’re excited about the 5G build out and working with local leaders.” The silence from FCC officials on the charges of corrupted regulators and ignored studies is simply another facet of the relationship between industry and government. Again, the strongest influence over the U.S. regulatory agencies can be traced to the Cellular Telecommunications & Internet Association. www.mintpressnews.com/big-wireless-lobbied-5g-data-collection-surveillance/267355/
