The truth about solar panels - do the pros outweigh the cons?

Подписаться 1,4 млн

Просмотров 233 тыс.

50% 1

The truth about solar panels - do the pros outweigh the cons? Head to www.squarespace.com/mattferrell to save 10% off your first purchase of a website or domain using code MATTFERRELL. Solar power has seen record growth over the past decade, created an incredible number of new jobs, and is one of the most affordable forms of generating energy. But with all of those panels popping up across rooftops and open areas, what happens when it comes time to replace them? And do the environmental impacts of manufacturing solar panels outweigh the benefits?
▻ Watch The truth about nuclear fusion power - new breakthroughs - • The truth about nuclea...
Follow-up podcast:
Video version - / @stilltbd
Audio version - bit.ly/stilltbdfm
▻ Full script and citations: undecidedmf.com/episodes/the-...
--------------------
▶ ▶ ▶ ADDITIONAL INFO ◀ ◀ ◀
▻ Support us on Patreon!
/ mattferrell
▻ Check out my podcast - Still To Be Determined:
bit.ly/stilltbdfm
▻ Tesla and smart home gear I really like:
kit.co/undecidedmf
▻ Undecided Amazon store front:
bit.ly/UndecidedAmazon
▻ Great Tesla Accessories
From Abstract Ocean - 15% Discount - Code: "Undecided"
bit.ly/UndecidedAO
▻ Jeda Wireless phone charger:
bit.ly/UndecidedJeda
▻ Get 1,000 miles of free supercharging with a new Tesla:
ts.la/matthew84515
PLEASE NOTE: For the Abstract Ocean discount you may have to click on the "cart" button, then "view bag" to enter the coupon code manually. Be sure to enter "undecided" there if you don't see the discount automatically applied.
All Amazon links are part of their affiliate program.
Thanks so much for your support!
--------------------
▶ ▶ ▶ GET IN TOUCH ◀ ◀ ◀
▻ X
X.com/mattferrell
▻ Instagram
/ mattferrell
▻ Facebook
/ undecidedmf
▻ Website
undecidedmf.com
--------------------
▻ Audio file(s) provided by Epidemic Sound
bit.ly/UndecidedEpidemic
#renewableenergy #solarpanels #truthabout #undecidedwithmattferrell

Наука

Опубликовано:

21 сен 2020

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 899

@UndecidedMF 3 года назад

What's your take on solar? If you liked this video, be sure to check out "The truth about wind turbines - how bad are they?" ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-WsswrLKlinU.html And be sure to check out my podcast where my brother I talk through some of your feedback! Still To Be Determined: stilltbd.fm/

@colin1235421 3 года назад

I wonder about the impact of the inverter and batteries on the same perspectives - impact of production, recycling... There is home use and then commercial systems and different types of batteries, but this would be quite interesting.

@mentat92 3 года назад

Missing the essential: energy storage. Very wrong to compare Gaz/Coal/Nuclear and Solar Panels. Controllable energy is totally different than Intermittent energy. Look blackout in California.

@chcomes 3 года назад

I was part of the PV Cycle original team back in 2007. Basically, the value of the recycled materials on the market, minus the recycling process cost, pays for the physical dismantling and logistics of taking the modules to the recycling plants. There may be a small minus or plus at the end depending on module type and other details.

@willdejong7763 3 года назад

Kudos Matt, great video. I agree with you, there's no doubt that solar is a better alternative to fossil fuels for electricity generation. But I live in Washington state where most of our electricity comes from hydro. I suspect that many of my well intentioned neighbors installing solar don't realize this. Not many people I've talked to understand things like LCA. Not that hydro doesn't have an environmental impact, it does. But I think that the case for the environmental benefits of solar over hydro is clearly not as strong as the case for solar over fossil fuels. So Matt, I'm curious what you think. Is installing residential solar the right thing to do for the environment when your local utilities are already largely based off of renewable energy sources? Cheers!

@artiomvas 3 года назад

Dislike for not including other renewables and nuclear in to comparison. Everybody knows solar is better than coal or gas. P.S.: One more failure of this video: you didn't take intermittency and energy storage into account.

@Senluis13 10 месяцев назад

This panel can put out close to 100 watts ru-vid.comUgkxOqI2yqX0XVrhR2BMJciTWrHJpG8FhJyg when positioned in the appropriate southernly direction, tilted to the optimal angle for your latitude/date, and connected to a higher capacity device than a 500. The built in kickstand angle is a fixed at 50 degrees. Up to 20% more power can be output by selecting the actual date and latitude optimal angle.The 500 will only input 3.5A maximum at 18 volts for 63 watts. Some of the excess power from the panel can be fed into a USB battery bank, charged directly from the panel while also charging a 500. This will allow you to harvest as much as 63 + 15 = 78 watts.If this panel is used to charge a larger device, such as the power station, then its full output potential can be realized.

@Forshledian 3 года назад

Almost everyone agrees the common enemy is fossil fuels, but solar (and wind) are still useless without storage. IMO, when discussing the pros and cons of solar panels, the plan for overnight storage needs to be discussed. Furthermore, as more of our transportation fleet converts to electric over the next 20 years, overall demand for electrical energy is going to increase, but so will available storage via these vehicles. A video that discusses overnight storage, transportation fleet conversion to electric and how nuclear can have a positive part to play in reversing carbon emissions is still desired. IMO

@chuckgoecke 3 года назад

Elon has an app for that. Appliance.

@beaconofwierd1883 3 года назад

There are lots of videos on the subject. Personally I did a cost analysis with weather data in my local area and the optimal strategy with commercially available parts is to install an excess amount of panels (so that you can meet your power needs on cloudy days in the winter) and then have a battery bank lasting around 3 days. When simulating this setup on wether data over the past 3 years where I live (Northern Europe) there were no power outages. So basically energy storage problem is kinda overrated, overnight storage can be provided by batteries without costing a fortune and dips in the weather can be solved by just using more panels (since they still work on cloudy days, theh just produce less). There are obviously some locations where this strategy might not work, but for most places it would work. You can also use the excess power generated to powercarbon capture devices, even if they are very inefficient you would still have a lot of excess power to waste, so why not put it to use instead of just throwing it away. The real problem is that people are waiting for cheaper energy storage instead, which makes sense from an economic standpoint since storage prices are dropping quite a lot so it makes more sense to wait for them to settle and then you know what ratio of pannels to betteries is optimal. Hopefully we can get good hydrogen storage, which could theoretically drop prices down to around 0.1 dollar/kWh instead of the 100 dollar/kwh we have now. But building cheap (and safe) hydrogen storage tanks is easier said that done.

@jamesshriver4822 3 года назад

Not just an OPINION my friend, a fact. Storage and the extremely toxic chemicals that must be (eventually) recycled or trashed not to mention mined in the first place are the MUCH bigger problem. Batteries: this is what is the bottle neck, and they have not come very far in terms of energy density for the time that they have been around!

@beaconofwierd1883 3 года назад

James Shriver I’d say a 10 fold increase at an exponential rate is a pretty big increase. For grid storage though the energy density is not of interest, it’s the cost per energy, which has and is still dropping. The recycling is still an issue, but it is also separate from the carbon emission and a lot of development is being done in that area.

@Baker.Matthew 3 года назад

@@jamesshriver4822 Solid state battery’s look very promising. I think there is still hope.

@Muppetkeeper 3 года назад

The University Of Sheffield in the UK has solar panels over 40 years old, they are still producing over 70% of their rated power. These panels were made badly compared to modern panels, so I’d say we’re looking at 40 years out of panels if you don’t mind a drop off in power. Most modern panels will stop degrading at around 80%.

@0hypnotoad0 3 года назад

Another thing to keep in mind is that even today, people will buy brand new solar panels with absolute garbage efficiency, like in the realm of 8-12%. If you can get a 30 year old quality panel that makes 60% of it's original higher efficiency, you're looking at something that will be way cheaper to make an installation with than some crappy junk you'd find on the internet.

@Turksarama 3 года назад

On the other hand, there _are_ some modern panels that are built really cheaply and badly. I have seen some systems break down in as short as 5 years. The industry is still in the relatively early stages where a lot of garbage comes out, but I expect it to get a lot better over time.

@Muppetkeeper 3 года назад

@@Turksarama True, I bought some good ones, the panel price was 50% more than some of the other brands, but they started with 22% efficiency (specified) and don't seem to be degrading much over the 8 years that I have had them.

@goofyfoot2001 3 года назад

Remove the tax credit. I'm tired of buying expensive cars and solar panels for rich people.

@Muppetkeeper 3 года назад

@@goofyfoot2001 Wait until you see how much we give to the coal miners and oil compnaies too. Us working grunts pay for everything.

@fbenniks 3 года назад

I feel this analysis should also include some form of storage. Solar without storage is not the complete picture.

@alanhonlunli 3 года назад

Solar shills always conveniently leave out that part of the equation. Matt is pretty darn decided in that regard.

@stephanarizona9094 Год назад

I have had 5 solar companies here in Arizona pitch me and they came in at $41K before tax credit that would bring the install down to around $28K for 24 panels, but I simply do not be the cost savings benefit, my bill is usually around $100-$150 a month, with the solar panels my bill would go up to $180 a month. I like the idea of solar but I'm simply not sold on the benefit of it. I would basically be swapping an electric bill for a solar panel payment bill.

@apl175 3 года назад

The reduction in degradation of the roof shingles that the panels cover is also remarkable. The shingles and roof fittings under the panels I have still look almost brand new.

@Hardstyler981 2 года назад

Do they charge you more in taxes?

@user-jx2ei1kh4q 9 месяцев назад

Wtf as that got to do with anything 😂😂😂😂

@user-hh6ex9md4w 7 месяцев назад

That's great to hear about the reduction in degradation of the roof shingles! In terms of outdoor gear and home backup power products, I highly recommend the Segway Portable PowerStation Cube Series. With its massive capacity, powerful output, and waterproof technology, it's a reliable choice for outdoor enthusiasts like us. Plus, the fast recharging and comprehensive protections make it even more convenient. Check it out if you're looking for a high-quality power solution!

@tazpartridge1612 4 месяца назад

Aussie here, recently installed 7.4kw panels and a Tesla Powerwall. In the 4 months since install, we have not drawn energy from the grid, our electricity bill is zero. AUD$24500 outlay, AUD $3000 per annum off power bill. 8 year payback without considering the benefits of blackout avoidance, being able to run the AC for less than 9 cents an hour, and avoiding future energy cost increases

@QuestionEverythingButWHY 3 года назад

"We don’t inherit the earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our children." --Native American proverb

@FilipCordas 3 года назад

That is not a 'Native American' proverb.

@laykefindley6604 3 года назад

@@FilipCordas it can't be directly attributed to it's source. -Some Earthling would probably suffice.

@mikesawyer1336 3 года назад

Wow where have I been - Mind if I borrow that proverb

@mikesawyer1336 3 года назад

@@musiccalgary I'm intrigued and interested in what you have to say but I don't understand. I assume at this point that you are telling us that all peoples are selfish and that no culture is doing a better job at focusing inward toward community.

@TheEnjiNeko 2 года назад

"Native american" What tribe? Who? "The native americans" we are not one people! If your going to quote something, do research and do it properly. Don't be mad because I'm upset, instead a little empathy and understanding. "Education breeds confidence. confidence breeds hope. Hope breeds peace" -The Asians

@ranty13 3 года назад

Thirty years ago we used a bank of 10 top grade (Arco) solar panels for our home in the Sahara Desert. Yes they worked well, especially since there was no alternative. But after 10 years in that environment they had lost 25% or more of their output. I think the talk of a 30-40 year lifespan is very optimistic. It's like the advertisements for electric cars "It will get UP TO 400 miles on a charge". But I do appreciate your analysis including the cost of manufacturing the panels vs constructing a gas or nuclear plant, and also the recycling issue.

@DanielSann 2 года назад

You are talking about the 90' and in the Sahara, in 30 years we have improved a lot and now most of the panels are guaranteed to have 90-95% after 10 years and 80% after 20-30 years. They can guarantee that because the actual degradation is less than that, the car manufacturers that say 400 miles they are not guaranteeing, instead they say "up to".

@FXIIBeaver 2 года назад

Except only concept cars are getting 400 miles. The vast majority of not all of the actually produced EVs are 350 and under.

@baneverything5580 2 года назад

@@DanielSann Try running a tiny window air conditioner from solar 24/7, rain or shine, and get back with me.

@ChiefsFanInSC 2 года назад

Keep in mind, that Car companies exagerrate the MPG performance of their cars....wildly. Those MPG ratings are in ideal conditions where the car is driven properly by a highly skilled driver.

@kyrond Год назад

@@ericerickson592 Right now I googled solar panels, and second link has 25 year warranty for 80%+ output. Warranty, so 1. it's most likely gonna not gonna be that bad, and 2. you can continue to use them below 80% power. That's easily 30+ years. Even if they only lasted for 20 years, they are some of the cleanest power generation we have.

@davidelliott5843 3 года назад

Recycling solar panels should be easy. The silicon is cheap. But the trace elements and rare earths are a higher concentration than virgin mined materials.

@wiezyczkowata 3 года назад

that's good to know, I was wondering about how, in like let's say 50 years, we would have such an amount of trash

@uspockdad6429 3 года назад

Silicon is cheap, yes, but extremely pure silicon like that in solar panels is not cheap to produce. I would think after recycling the rest of the components, solar panel manufactures would want to buy back recycled panel silicon because it is already so pure.

@tasa4904 3 года назад

The problem is the other stuff like the protective enameled glass/plastic coating that's practically bonded to the silicon. How do you separate the two and can you maintain the high purity of the silicon with minimal reprocessing if you do?

@c-hd5696 3 года назад

We are going solar at the end of October 2020. Can't wait. You helped me convince my wife with all your amazing videos. And her biggest fear was "environment impact while making and end of life". Now, she will be even happier with our decision. Matt, you are amazing. Love your channel and the way you explain everything. I would love for more videos though :)

@lc285 Год назад

Has your insurance company raised your rates or cancelled your policy?

@c-hd5696 Год назад

@@lc285 i had called but nope.

@lifeaccordingtobri 3 года назад

great video Matt as usual. Love our PV system and can't imagine not being solar from here on out. Recycling is key and as a country we need to move to the forefront rather than always trailing the rest of the globe. Keep up the good work.

@randyrice1429 3 года назад

Matt, I LOVE that you do all the research and I just have to listen. Matt Ferrell University. Another great video for your students. Thanks.

@AndyFletcherX31 3 года назад

One aspect of embedded CO2 in panels is that it is critically dependant on the energy sources during panel manufacture. If you use gas produced electricity then it works out at about 450g/kwh for the primary power during manufacture. This then shows up as a high embodied CO2 cost per panel. However if you use solar power to produce the power to manufacture the panels then you are down at about 40g/kwh which means the embodied CO2 in the panel is correspondingly lower. If you then repeat this process using the new panels to produce power for the next generation then the figures drop again as you ratchet downwards. You cannot do this if you are using fossil fuels to produce the energy to manufacture the panels.

@Bobucles 3 года назад

That was covered by the energy payback time. Turning fossil fuel energy into 10x the solar energy is not a bad investment. It ultimately accelerates the push to solar, which means less fossil fuel use in the long term.

@UndecidedMF 3 года назад

Good point!

@AnalystPrime 3 года назад

@@Bobucles Maybe, but nobody mentions that when they say renewables or EVs have CO2 footprint. It is always "solar panels are made with coal!" "Wind turbines are made with coal!" "EVs are made with coal!" And then those panels are assumed to be installed upside down inside a coal mine so they will never produce more power than it took to make them, and finally they are set on fire and the ashes fed to endangered animals so you can say they couldn't be recycled and they release poisons into nature.

@Bobucles 3 года назад

@@AnalystPrime The world has enough strawmen. Don't waste effort making new ones, they're been doing it far longer and far better than you ever could. In any event the industrialized world NEEDS energy and it doesn't particularly care where that energy comes from. The best weapon against fossil fuel energy is to keep developing solar/wind/renewable energy and make it the best, cheapest solution out there. Solar has a massive advantage over other options because it doesn't require special land or high skilled workers to set up. There are real world obstacles to setting up wind (too tall), hydro(location), coal(loud/dirty) or nuclear power(NIMBY/high education). On the other hand, ANY idiot can plop down a solar panel and become their own energy provider. The competitive market loves that kind of stuff, and that's going to push solar power harder than other options.

@gadget5129 3 года назад

Dude, I always find your content to be rational and informative. But this one was simply outstanding! Great job. Thanks!

@davidelliott5843 3 года назад

It’s such a shame that nuclear technologies are ignored. Yes the existing plant is big, expensive and needs costly active systems to keep it safe. We now have fully engineered designs ready to go. The hold up is the incredibly slow regulatory system. I’m thinking about Moltex and Elysium who have waste burning plants that use up the stored waste nuclear fuel we have at every existing plant. They are not even expensive. Removing the stuff that can potentially overheat or leak or explode pushes down the cost. Moltex has already been costed below the price of a gas fired plant. Fuel costs are negative because they are taking away high level nuclear waste.

@AndyFletcherX31 3 года назад

Nuclear is very expensive per MWH compared with renewables and this is resulting in projects being cancelled everywhere - the UK has had two projects dropped in the last few months and I don't expect Hinkley Point C ever being completed and going into service. Biggest problem with nuclear is long term management after decommissioning the costs of which are invariably passed onto future generations and not properly costed into projects. EDF in France is in deep trouble now as there are a load of reactors about to end service and they will have to start decomissioning soon and they don't have it budgeted for - the French state will have to bail them out big time. Another issue with nuclear is the mining and purification of fuel which has a large environmental impact.

@AndyFletcherX31 3 года назад

A discussion about EDF costs can be found at this link. www.nuclear-transparency-watch.eu/activities/nuclear-decommissioning/how-much-will-it-really-cost-to-decommission-the-ageing-french-nuclear-fleet.html

@MrTubeNR 3 года назад

losalamosreporter.com/2020/09/14/small-modular-reactor-decision-made-with-inadequate-information/

@UndecidedMF 3 года назад

I don't think it's ignored. There's a lot of movement and investment into next gen nuclear, but it's more expensive. Utilities will always gravitate towards the lower $ per MWh.

@haggischaser1028 3 года назад

Great video Matt, love the figures breakdown. Keep up the excellent work. Your hard work makes it easy for people to understand and make informed decisions.

@abigailpip112 3 года назад

Hmm mm? Did you take into account the mining of rare metals and the lakes of polution in China where they are mined when doing your comparisons?

@marionogueiraramos9488 3 года назад

great video as always! super well researched and beautifully edited... information as entertainment. Thank you.

@brianp9937 3 года назад

I feel as though batteries (which I know you covered in other videos) need to be included in the environmental costs of solar since solar depends on sun and it’s reasonable to expect consumers to have 1 or 2 batteries minimum.

@ericslavich4297 3 года назад

True enough, but then for a fair comparison you would have to also include the costs of demand surge power for non-solar power, which involves additional power plants that go on and offline as needed.

@brianp9937 3 года назад

Eric Slavich I’m not sure I follow exactly what you’re saying. If you have any reading references to help me understand your point, I would appreciate it. Thanks for your reply.

@ericslavich4297 3 года назад

@@brianp9937 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peaking_power_plant

@eliasthoumy 3 года назад

Thank you for this great video! But what about the energy cost of recycling?

@supportyourtroopsathletes6460 3 года назад

I am buying the hardware little by little and have some great prices now but with 390 watt panels each (locally) not including other product prices. Most are fairly reasonable also. My biggest issue that I am struggling for is how many panels I would need to operate off solar during the day yet keeping the batteries charged for night use. When it comes to the math of doing the panels first, this has been a headache that I can't figure out as I am having those installed first by someone else since I can't get on the roof but the rest of the set up, I am doing myself.

@gregcollins3404 3 года назад

My position is that solar is monumentally better than coal. The Harvard Medical School did a study five years ago that concluded the deleterious health costs of burning coal in the USA total between $300 to 500 billion per year. That's over $1000 per person per year! If the utilities want to pass that cost on to their rate payers, I'd be glad to talk about the life cycle costs of solar.... And PV panels last 50 years no problem.

@magyararon6918 3 года назад

Levelized cost of electricity is insanely misleading when you compare reliable and unreliable sources at the same time, i hate how everyone is using it because its serves their renewable agenda. How is it the "full picture" when its literally ignores every cons of renewable, while none of the other sources(coal, nuclear, gas) has any of those cons? Why is intermittency not present in this cost? That what makes the grid insanely expensive, you cannot just ignore that part and say renewables is cheap, because not, they are expensive when you look at the whole system.

@geekdomo 3 года назад

We designed and installed our own solar system on our home. After rebates 7500W costs us around 4k. We are grid tied and use our EVs as the batteries any excess we get credit from our electric company. Our first panels were 120w. The latest ones we put on this year are 350w and cost the same per panel. At this rate the panels will keep getting much cheaper.

@comeradecoyote 3 года назад

I think one area you should have covered more of, is energy density, storage, efficiency loss, and grid stability. You should also do a video specifically on nuclear fission.

@howardkearney7989 3 года назад

Thanks! I'm building a storage shed and will be using Solar/battery just for this shed. We'll be my first foray and test before applying to my home.

@UndecidedMF 3 года назад

That's a great way to dip your toe into it. Smart move!

@hanswallner2188 3 года назад

superb as usual, thank you for your excellent work!

@senthilkumarn4u 3 года назад

Good one you've answered the question that was on my mind for some time now.. Thank you 🙂

@TheSpudmckenzie 3 года назад

If anyone has any solar panels they want to get rid of, send em my way. I can't find any old ones cheap locally. There's to much money in recycling. /s

@furripupau 3 года назад

If anyone has some burned up coal they want to get rid of, send it my way. I can't find any burned up coal locally. There's too much money in recycling. /s

@warlordxxl 3 года назад

I have found cheap, used panels locally (Europe) and return of investment was 1.5 - 2 years. Free hot water for rest of my life. ;-P

@warlordxxl 3 года назад

@@furripupau I would not mind to get limitless amounts of free ash, that I could sell to local cement factory. (what a waste of materials and sarcasm)

@markmcdougal1199 3 года назад

Great job Matt - clear, concise, important information. Well, delivered, as always.

@UndecidedMF 3 года назад

Much appreciated!

@johndonaldson5126 3 года назад

Our rooftop system (now almost 3 years in operation) will pay back in less than 8 years. It would have been much longer and not economic were it not for two things. 1) Federal incentives dropped the overall cost of the system by about 30%. 2) We bought a PHEV car which is also charged with the solar system. Having solar for the electric car not only made the purchase of the car more attractive but it also made the solar system a better deal.

@HadToChangeMyName_YoutubeSucks 3 года назад

The federal government taking money from my paycheck to pay for your car and personal power station does not reduce the cost, it reduces the amount of the cost you pay. That's like saying your new Rolls Royce was perfectly affordable for you because the government made me buy it for you. No one, private or business, would use solar if the government weren't paying large chunks of the actual cost and creating legal mandates to use them. Not only are my taxes going to pay for your personal property but the cost of my electricity goes up because my power company is forced to use more expensive options to produce the electricity they sell me.

@malcolmrose3361 3 года назад

@@HadToChangeMyName_RU-vidSucks I completely agree - let the government cease any and all business subsidies. Including direct subsidies to oil and gas companies ($666M between 1950 and 2016, in 2015 dollars) and indirect subsidies for the oil industry via special treatment in the tax code. And let's not forget the biggest subsidy to big oil - the provision by the Department of Defence of the US Army, Navy and Air Force to go bail them out when their investment in a foreign regime goes South.

@DsmB2007 3 года назад

Hi Matt. I live in MA also. I invested in Solar this year. Interconnected in mid January. As of June/July, I’ve banked about $700 in net metering and been paid about $500. NG is catching up to paying me. I’ve paid $0 in elect/heat since May. My April bill was $60! I’ve renovated and removed my 30yr old oil furnace. I use exclusively Mitsubishi hyper heat mini splits. Also have closed cell spray foam in 75% of the walls. Hopefully (2) Powerwalls coming soon. Wanted (3). But somehow, where I live I was told an upgrade to transformer needed to happen. And get this price to do this was between $2k & $60k!! LOL. Great video. As always.

@chimaobiigwe7506 2 года назад

Hi Dbonaire, I live in MA also. I changed my heating system from oil to heat pump (Mitsubishi mini splits) in 2021 but my elect bill during this 3 months (Dec-Feb) is not funny. Averaging $750 for a single family house. So i am looking at switching to solar. I got offer for the panel & installation of about $60k and i will be paying $190 per month. Though the rate looks good on paper but i don't know how effective solar system is in winter. What is your experience in the last 4 months.

@ChrisColeman1962 3 года назад

Hi Matt, I have been watching your channel for a while now, and have just requested an estimate for solar here in the Uk. I was so shocked £7600 for 11 panels and a 16KW battery ! We are just waiting for our electric meter to be changed to a smaet meter , then we can send electricity back when we have surplus !

@DwainDwight 3 года назад

we had solar panels on our roof back in 1982 in Perth Western Australia. we heated & cooled with house & heated the water with it. cut our power bills in half. can't believe how slow things have moved. but good news we are making some real headway with it.

@BrentsTreehouse 3 года назад

One of the big remaining barriers is costs of preventative regulation. My state (Florida) is trying to make it hard for people to use solar in their homes in order to prop up the status quo.

@GreyDeathVaccine 3 года назад

Damn it. Your state has retards officials.

@wlhgmk 3 года назад

Florida is populated by elderly retired people, many of whom caused climate change in the first place. You have to elect young dynamic Democrats. Never mind, they will soon be under water.

@madsciencegary3830 3 года назад

Actually, net zero metering is the law in Florida. Besides building substantial capacity (though not as much as some other states) for large scale generation by the utilities, every homeowner in Florida has the right to install solar and get one for one credit for power they generate beyond their usage against power you use at other times. That is a net cost to other non-solar households because they are paying solar homes at the retail rate for generation, not wholesale cost, and as a regulated industry those costs are directly passed to all homes, so it is done specifically to encourage Florida homeowners to install solar, not to discourage it. In what other ways are you seeing Florida as trying to make it hard for people to use solar? It may be there, but I don't see it.

@BrentsTreehouse 3 года назад

@@madsciencegary3830 have a look here -- www.nytimes.com/2019/07/07/business/energy-environment/florida-solar-power.html July 7, 2019 ST. PETERSBURG, Fla. - Florida calls itself the Sunshine State. But when it comes to the use of solar power, it trails 19 states, including not-so-sunny Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York and Maryland. Solar experts and environmentalists blame the state’s utilities. The utilities have hindered potential rivals seeking to offer residential solar power. They have spent tens of millions of dollars on lobbying, ad campaigns and political contributions. And when homeowners purchase solar equipment, the utilities have delayed connecting the systems for months. ....

@fredpinczuk7352 3 года назад

@@wlhgmk Small correction: "Young dynamic electoral candidates". Takes 2 to tango. Don't dismiss all GOP simply because the average are anti-green energy. There are changes that need to happen within that demographics as well. Otherwise it will be a constant battle of yin and yang.

@EdWood110 3 года назад

Another amazing and well-done video. Easy to digest! Thank you so much!

@heinuchung8680 3 года назад

25/30 years at current rates

@abelincoln78 3 года назад

It's good to hear. I think solar cells will be a big part of the way forward, especially when installed locally with storage and in combination with HVAC strategies to reduce afternoon peak energy consumption. Those solar fields drive me crazy though. There are more than enough warehouses and parking lots out there to cover in panels to negate the need for a solar field. Will they lose active tracking? Probably. But at least we wouldn't be wrecking grasslands or reducing available farmland in the name of "clean energy".

@CJ-bg9wk 3 года назад

In Germany we are Facing a big Problem. Our 'Renewable Energy Law' needs to be redone, everything new in it is written by coal and fossil fuel lobby. Old systems need to be replaced or a lot of money in them to be allowed to use the power for ourself. New systems are limited in power and are put under more regulation, net metering is not possible, you're power company gets even more control and can turn of the system... And the worst: The Roll-out for new systems is limited by law... you get less than 7 cents (net)/kWh, while paying more than 20 cents (net)/kWh... if you build more than 10kWp system, you need to pay extra fees on every kWh you use yourself!!, even if the EU said this is illegal!

@michielecker 3 года назад

Wow, I knew they messed up with their green energy roll-out but I didn't realize they actually skewed the rules in such an extreme way. Hopefully neighboring countries will show how things should be done. Now there's Octopus Energy (originally British company) that is making waves with their energy system and applications. They recently bought a German energy provider to enter the German market. So maybe look into them? (I don't have any personal experience with them, but from what I've read they're very interesting and make good use of Green Energy generation intermittence balancing etc.).

@rklauco 3 года назад

I would guess majority of the comments against solar panels have a backup in the money the oil industry used over last decade against anything non-oil. For me, the most interesting aspect of solar is the new idea of agri-solar - providing shade for crops, limiting water usage, increasing yield while producing electricity. Sounds like a miracle to me ;)

@tristanmorris5646 3 года назад

Providing shade for crops? Why?

@rklauco 3 года назад

@@tristanmorris5646 With global warming it seems that irrigation is no longer effective - excessive sun evaporates the water faster than plants can use it. That's where shade comes and the plants benefit from it. There was some video about US farmers trying to go in this direction.

@tristanmorris5646 3 года назад

@@rklauco Interesting, thanks!

@denniss3980 3 года назад

Is the oil industry also against nuclear energy

@patrickwilkin441 3 года назад

It would have been nice to see the comparison include home / grid level storage impacts as these will be needed to offset the ability of carbon fuel sources to closely fit demand.

@Joso997 3 года назад

Is this industry standard or the best-case scenario for solar panel production?

@davidbrenchley 3 года назад

When are these $1 - $2 per watt panels coming out? I think I'll wait for them, unless we are talking decades.

@danielsloan8426 2 года назад

Well being a Solar owner this is now what I am facing on August 2,2021 we had a power surge from our electric Co-op company.It fired our surge protector box and 22 Microinverters on our solar panels our solar company said that our Microinverters are not covered under warranty for this type of action by the Electric Co-Op our Surge protect box was covered under warranty but not our Microinverters something wrong with this picture.Our Electric Co-Op told us to file with our home owner's insurance told them so this means I have to pay for your fault to my solar system so for no luck finding a lawyer to take any type of action.Our solar system is still down today so we are now at the mercy of our Electric Co-Op Company.

@skenzyme81 3 года назад

There is also the very real issue of land use. Panels on your home’s roof is one thing, but that can only provide a tiny fraction of total need. In many areas, installing enough solar just to provide the DAYTIME needs of a city will require significant habitat destruction in the surrounding area - if not outright clear cutting. A nuclear power plant might require around a square mile of land. In 10 years, how much power could such a plant generate? If the same site were used as a solar farm instead, how much less power would be produced? 50%? 1%?

@MrTubeNR 3 года назад

It's around 1/5 of the required space for nuclear compared to solar. Which I think included the enrichment and mining facilities. I couldn't the paper I saw that in. It's really difficult to put a nuclear plant on your roof, or down town. Mixed use solar installations aren't really a problem.

@MDP1702 3 года назад

There is plenty of already used land area where solar can be used. Roofs are one thing (and many roofs still don't have solar), but what about parking lots for example? Hell, you can even combine solar panels with agriculture, in more arid regions (like Arizona) it even helps with lower water usage and larger crops due to the shade provided. So land use should really be a problem. It is just that it is easier filling up not used land for now. Regulation could change that though.

@usmcsaxoki 3 года назад

Great video again Matt. Reinforces my decision to install solar on my house. Just signed my contract and hope to have my system online before December this year. 8 KW system using (20) 400 Watt monocrystalline panels and Enphase microinverters. $2.45 per watt before federal tax credit. I've got a great south facing roof with zero shade. In my opinion, stupid not to install.

@ninemilliondollars 3 года назад

Have they been installed? If so, can you provide real metrics?

@HaloWolf102 2 года назад

The only question for any renewable energy, is the amount of energy produced by whatever process you want to use, matched with the same energy burning fossil fuels. What pollutes more? This accounts for transportation, maintenance, and decommission. This also accounts for the raw material needed to create these machines that make power. That raw material takes trucks, and fuel to transport it from Point A to B. As well as melting that raw material down, and refining it further, to be used correctly. EDIT: I made the comment before the video, and the video actually addresses some of these topics. Which was surprising. Good video.

@tomrobertson3236 3 года назад

Per tony Seba When the cost of solar drops below the cost of grid transmission .....

@neology81 3 года назад

Great video! Maybe a follow up video on solar energy storage recycling?

@jizzlecizzle1388 3 года назад

8:55, there was an attempt, but 'Veolia' is pronounced like 'Ve' (as in 'very'), 'O', 'Lja' (the last part is pronounced like the German 'yes', 'ja').

@rjtumble 3 года назад

I'm hoping to build a house in the near future. Thanks to your videos, solar is going to be really high on the list of designed in features.

@a64738 3 года назад

I am using solar panels to charge the battery bank in my camper-van... It pays of the cost really fast compared to having to run the engine or take into a campsite at 30$+ a night to get electricity that is the cost in Finland and even more in Norway. I have now only a 110w panel just to top of the starter battery when the car is parked for long periods. Now the sun is so low in the horizon and there is so much clouds that you get less then 1w power most of the time but it is enough to keep up with the battery discharge. Plan is a 1200w of panels as that is what is room for on top of the roof.

@farnsnoble6645 3 года назад

Why is every @Undecided video amazing!! Great work Matt.

@UndecidedMF 3 года назад

I'm blushing. Glad you liked it!

@skenzyme81 3 года назад

Excellent review, but in the net energy calculation, you left out the energy required to recycle the panels back into raw materials. If your original calculation included things like the mining, smelting, and extruding of aluminum, I can see how the direct energy use could be less. However, complex recycling can COST more. That cost has its own energy footprint in the form of an industrial workforce. Much to consider.

@robertsmith4681 3 года назад

The Jedi mind trick of glossing over the one argument that basically explains why every solar projeect ever devised failed miserably. At best he more or less ends with something along the lines of 'sure we'll have to bury all this stuff in 30 years because otherwise we'll go bankrupt".... There is a reason that no solar panel manufacturer operates using only energy produced by the very panels that they make.... Let alone provide a closed loop manufacture and recycling operation that is only powered by the very panels that they make ....

@stephanweinberger 3 года назад

@@robertsmith4681 the energy cost of recycling is about the same as producing the panels (it's still profitable though, since you get back the raw materials!). So this would bring the payback period from 4 to 8 years - still a net gain with a 30+ years life cycle. (And those 4 years are outdated anyways - it's more like 1.5 years even today according to www.ise.fraunhofer.de/content/dam/ise/de/documents/publications/studies/Photovoltaics-Report.pdf)

@robertsmith4681 3 года назад

@@stephanweinberger If it works in numbers then why didn't anybody ever manage to make it work in practice ... ?

@stephanweinberger 3 года назад

@@robertsmith4681 erm... where hasn't it worked in practice? Are you talking about solar panels (thousands of commercial installations worldwide) or concentrated solar power (a couple of test installations)?

@jamesbuchanan3439 3 года назад

In one of the Freakonomics books, the economist/authors stated that solar panels were bad because they were dark in color, so that the planet will absorb overall more heat than what was there before, which according to them means that solar panels are "bad". (Obviously, if around 20% of the impinging light becomes usable electricity, then around 80% will be dissipated as heat.) I always thought that this analysis was flawed, because 1) if you put them on an already dark roof, there is no harm done; in fact, an improvement is achieved, 2) if the solar panel electricity generated is replacing energy that would have been releasing greenhouse gasses, there is a multiplicative effect of benefit due to solar, as the greenhouse gases can cause outsize planetary heat retention that goes on indefinitely, and 3) it would be easy to make something else light-colored and/or reflective in order to offset the darkness of the solar panels. Thoughts?

@MrTubeNR 3 года назад

There is something to be explored here. Not my personal area. Alot of the higher sustainability type houses tend to color their roofs to their climate zone. If it's cooler they go for a dark roof etc. Although solar panels also shade that portion of the roof. Agravoltaics and urban heat Islands would probably interest you.

@UndecidedMF 3 года назад

Beyond my pay grade, but my rough understanding is that the darkness wouldn't have an impact. Look at the big picture, dark solar panels are on top of my dark roof tiles. If I didn't have solar panels, my roof would still be absorbing the same energy/heat. Solar arrays above parking lots ... same thing. Interesting conversation about this here: physics.stackexchange.com/questions/433427/why-dont-solar-panels-contribute-to-global-warming

@Bobucles 3 года назад

Dark surfaces are a two way street. I think the property you're looking for is emittivity. In general an object that absorbs quickly also releases quickly.

@pablopicaro7649 3 года назад

The solar panel area is an infinitesimal small percentage of the area of land and water. It is so tiny as to not matter.

@AlexWaardenburg 3 года назад

Important video to make. Solar is a significant improvement over fossil fuels in every way, and we need to deploy them as fast as possible, even if recycling infrastructure is not set up yet, because they are replacing fossil fuels, which pollute significantly more and also don't have recycling.

@UndecidedMF 3 года назад

Thanks, Alex.

@RobinHagg 3 года назад

If I own anything that will last 25-30 years from now (I do own a few panels) and it still works then that is a win. I can only think of a house would last that long. Things that will not last as long, car, boat, phone, computer, fridge...... Im pretty happy with panels. And happy to hear they can be recycled and I will when that day comes

@rrad8106 3 года назад

We live in Southern New England, and were almost sold on installing solar on our roof. But then I talked to a friend of mine who is also a realtor, and was advised that, unless we are planning to live in our house for the next 20 years, we will not reclaim our investment in the addition, plus any additional structural upgrades (expansion, dormers, etc.) would then prove problematic. Given that both my husband and I are nearing 60, we decided against the installation. What we are looking at now are utility companies that are augmenting their power grids with solar (and wind) farms, and subscribing to them as part of the overall service to our home. Where we do see the potential for investment is in geothermal. Our home, like most in New England, relies on oil for heating. Right now, oil heat is considerably less expensive than electric, however, geothermal combined with electric (combined with a solar power service provider) should reduce our carbon footprint substantially and keep our monthly costs within reason.

@mk8530 3 года назад

Also - Until you pay the system off, there is a lien on your house. The Buyer would either have to agree to take over that loan, or you pay it off. Otherwise - no sale.

@ninemilliondollars 3 года назад

Just plant some trees in you yard to compensate for the footprint.

@marieortiz5533 2 года назад

Informative Show-Thank You.

@nightdipper5178 2 года назад

I'm paying 30 cents a KW and expect it to rise to 50 cents over the next 15 years. The financial benefit is the only reason I'm adding the complexity of solar to my home. I am proud of my carbon footprint.

@PivotEnergySolar 3 года назад

The pros definitely outweigh the cons. We've been building commercial solar and community solar projects for over 10 years. This is the power of the now, not just the future!

@MrSinEon 2 года назад

The energy have to be stored

@joshdelacruz9883 3 года назад

Im gonna go on a limb here (partly because this is my current plan for mine) and assume that the more widespread adoption of variable speed drives in things like air conditioners will prolong the life of solar panels beyond the 30 years, especially as more and more become willing to accept the native dc output from solar. ex..... Mine is currently sized to cover full demand so gradual increasing efficiency of appliances as they die and get replaced along with eliminating double conversion inefficiency in variable speed drives should theoretically extend the usable life beyond the 30 years as there would essentially be no ROI for replacing with new panels. Disclaimer thats residential on site solar not utility scale solar. I am only supplying myself

@grand_scuttler2300 3 года назад

I bought solar panels for my house about a year ago and I have mixed feelings about them. Your experience will be specific to your state, but in my state when you link to the power grid through the electrical company they get your solar credits, and they pay far below market value here. While the panels do defray my electrical bill - to nearly zero most months - it has increased my total cost, albeit while supposedly adding equity to my house. Solar panels themselves do not have an off switch, so they increase the likelihood of a house fire and can complicate firefighting. I think society would be better off if we left electricity generation to the pros and nuclear energy.

@natesmith2511 3 года назад

If you are in a state that is deregulated, you need to search out a supplier that buys back cent for cent.

@ninemilliondollars 3 года назад

Thanks for a realistic comment. Electric companies never pay what they charge you.

@nhbilly 3 года назад

I have 3.6kwh system. For 2019 I only paid about $75 for electricity. For 2020 I project under $90 because it was really hot in San Antonio, TX.

@IDann1 3 года назад

Thanks, you answered most of the questions asked to me this week.

@UndecidedMF 3 года назад

Awesome!

@TheLotw 3 года назад

Its the regulations that cause the price to be higher. Permits, instpections, etc cause massive costs to the buyer.

@OldTimerGarden 3 года назад

I'd be worried about the additional cost to re-roof my house if solar panels need to be removed in order to do that repair.

@peterteoh6401 3 года назад

unless you are installing a Tesla roof tile system, or other PV roof tiles, you do not need to re roof while changing over your PV panels. Support frames are fixed to your roof structure, then panels are fixed on the support frame. Support frames are mostly universal, which can be reused for future panels.

@andrewfernandez7203 3 года назад

Sounds promising. It would interesting to see the same kinds of "studies" on Lithium batteries and/or Powerwalls and their equivalents.

@tobyneufeldt5763 3 года назад

Thank you for that great info Matt. Your a 🌟

@skydivekrazy76 3 года назад

Love your work. Thank you.

@chuckythe2651 3 года назад

Great analysis, only item you need to cover from an "apples to apples" comparison is time of day / energy storage. Fossil fuels can fire up and provide power all 24 hours in the day. For solar to accomplish this, you need storage mediums. By the way, I'm not advocating for fossil fuels in any way shape or form. Just want to have the full picture out there, because this will be the #1 retort of the people that don't want to see us get off fossil fuels.

@dancook6174 3 года назад

Excellent, well presented. You also need to add the old adage that 'necessity is the mother of invention,' as time progresses and volume grows, costs go down. So if we keep environmental considerations in the public eye, the loop is closed. The industry will follow the most profitable path; we just need to task them and support the best environmental and cost-efficient solution, not necessarily today, but for the future.

@redpillgreenenergy141 3 года назад

My take on Solar, getting 10.2 kW system installed next month. Love green energy and the way Tesla does it, make the product better than others and you don't need government regulations that can change over time, the free market will push all forms of green energy forward.

@mirop8864 3 года назад

our goverment in Slovakia is in favor of nuclear power. It cost many bilions of euros to build the second one with decade of delay and now we need bilions of reserve fund to destroy the old one. the most expensive electricity compare to country around us. most of the big company get below the cost discount on electricity to stay in production. my 4k solar panel on roof produce 100% energy i need from march till october, more than half in the winter. and some people still say solar is expensive and not effective...

@warlordxxl 3 года назад

We can recycle 98% of materials easily. Remaining 2% is the dust in the air filters (crushing panels). It is a good, subsidized, profitable business. No need for subsidy. Amount of e-waste will grow, but recycling will grow as well. I see no problem here. Have you ever seen a huge pile of solar panels being dumped in a landfill? Have you ever seen a discarded solar panel? We tend to do things differently here in central Europe ;-)

@junkerzn7312 3 года назад

I have a 3000W system installed around 2000. 18 x 165W Sharp panels. Yah yah, it seems small, but back in 2000 that was considered to be a fairly large system! And expensive! It cost somewhere around $30K at the time. 20 years on and they all still work, though the seams at the edge don't look too hot and the glass isn't quite as clear as it was. They generate a bit less power but honestly for y2000 panels they've held up pretty well! Panels have improved so much since then that I am seriously considering ripping these out and replacing them which does bring up another longevity question in terms of technology improvements driving earlier-than-necessary replacement cycles. Overall, though, I think panels are far more green than almost anything else. Look at the mess involved in decommissioning a nuclear plant or a coal power plant? The very ground for half a mile in every direction from a coal power plant is contaminated with heavy metals and coal ash ponds are enormously damaging. Waste from a nuclear plant basically can't be recycled at all and has to be sequestered and even just the decommissioning process for a nuclear plant costs billions! At least with solar panels you can safely remove them without leaving contaminated ground behind, and cheaply ship them off to a dedicated recycling facility. Or sell them into the secondary market... if the panels still work (which they mostly will), there is a secondary market happy to put them to good use. After all, there are really only two things which can actually break in a panel: The weather seals and the interconnects between cells. Both can be readily improved as the technology evolves (and have). The actual cells degrade over time but otherwise remain functional. -Matt

@cassiuslives4807 3 года назад

I recall talking to a German engineer who went to India and China to teach factories there how to make solar panels in 2016. When stating "the solar panels pay themselves back in 3 years 6:35" there is an assumption that they are manufactured properly by skilled workers as the efficiency is related to the quality of the panel. The engineer was trying to tell me that this isn't the case.

@UndecidedMF 3 года назад

True. The quality of the panel and manufacturing techniques play a big role in that.

@cassiuslives4807 3 года назад

@@UndecidedMF that engineer was disparaging the workmanship of the operators he was training. Not sure if it was bias on his part, but his story to me was, "I told them, rule #1, don't touch the hot glue/resin. Rule #2, don't touch the hot glue/resin." Guess which rule they broke first. In terms of baseload power, interesting to see if floating LFTR reactors appear, or they solve the OTEC's seawater corrosion problems without having to resort to using titanium. Not confident that battery technology will advance enough at this time to make Solar viable without subsidy.

@FlyingwaveFilms 3 года назад

Excellent ! Thank you !!! Best from Geneva,

@justinfinch2458 2 года назад

thanks for this, I am selling solar and it is important to me that we are actually helping people out and making cleaner energy

@colt45lmer 3 года назад

what about the impact of all the massive batterys that are needed to truly make solar useful for powering well anything at night

@jrflxcrpz 3 года назад

Also what about the invironmental impact of mining for the materials used to make solar panels.

@nniemeyernn2 3 года назад

Batteries from the automotive sector are useful to recycle into homes because homes don't need power the same way as EVs. They can then be recycled to their base materials and made into new batteries. There are a few US companies doing it already but more will come once there is more money to be made in it. I would assume that the same would be said about the solar panels once they are degraded beyond use.

@colt45lmer 3 года назад

@@nniemeyernn2 only problem I still see their is how much is still actually usable. I don't see this as remotely sustainable until graphine and carbon nanotube batteries are in full production. Furthermore all these people with ev cars and batteries etc. Unless they have the pannels to produce the power all the electricity is still coming from coal and oil power plants.... and now it's far less efficient than gas due to the up to 30% efficacy loss in our power grid

@EricCummingsNB 2 года назад

@@jrflxcrpz lol someone obviously never watched the video

@jessejordan8874 2 года назад

I was hoping to see the gentleman respond to these comments. I would like to credit him for endeavoring this deeply complex issue and admired the metrics that were captured here. However, I feel that we did not discuss the environmental impacts of the mining process, shipping the panels to their destination, as well as net loss over an inefficient grid system. If anyone can drop a link to fully explanatory study I would appreciate it, especially as it compares to natural gas. We need to understand also, a panel environmentally pays for itself in 4 years as to the energy took to make one, but we need a number to track how many years of carbon emissions from nat gas are equal to one year with solar while factoring in all emissions associated with mining, shipping, manufacturing, shipping, shipping again, then installing.

@MrYowie 3 года назад

Matt, do you know what the LCA is of your new Powerwall 2?

@paulf3353 3 года назад

Here in UK ROI is the big issue IMO. Panel cost is not the problem, but installers offsetting any panel price advantages and bumping installation costs. So really IMO here, it only makes sense DIY installation, but in the UK it is only legal for off-grid application.

@lukakrulc1092 3 года назад

I find this video very informative even for people who study solar energy a lot. :) By the way, is this part of internet right to find investors for solar farm project?

@JB78ization 3 года назад

Third?! Let's have a great battery day today!! Nice video thank you

@UndecidedMF 3 года назад

Really excited to see what they unveil.

@MDP1702 3 года назад

did you mean 1,1 GW instead of 1,1 MW at 3:08? Since Apple on their own already has almost 400 MW installed in the graph.

@michiganengineer8621 3 года назад

Good analysis on the PANEL side of solar power. I can see a potential for a "distributed grid generation" system where literally _EVERY_ home and business has solar and/or wind generation tied into the grid. The problem arises when the wind isn't blowing enough to generate usable juice and there isn't enough sunlight (like in the northern US this time of year). Domestic LiFePo battery banks aren't bad, except for the co$t of course, and you have the "end-of-life" coming much sooner (and more often) for batteries than for the panels. Do you think _UTILITY_ scaled electric storage systems would be a viable solution with a distributed production scenario?

@BobBob-ov1zv 3 года назад

My solar is getting installed in the next few weeks just under $4000 for 6.66kw plus an 1850 government interest free loan Paid back over 4 years so upfront cost is 2150 pretty happy

@ryanvannice7878 3 года назад

I wish solar was a great option, but there are a number of barriers to overcome. First, the initial cost; the only folks that can finance solar are the top 25 percent or so. Realistic payback times are likely 10-15 years, so you're asking a lot of people to wait a decade for the investment to pay off. Second is that it's not a 24/7 source; you have to have another option. I can see that later in my life, energy infrastructure will be modified to accommodate solar's constraints.

@Noneyabiz001 2 года назад

What about the study where they found most solar panels have a 20-50% loss of production in the first couple years? Is this no longer a factor? Do the account for the loss of production in the install? If this is still the case, how do you make up for the loss. What about the fact that large industrial solar companies replace at the least 10 to 15 panels a day either due to breakage malfunction or decay. What about the carbon created to mine the minerals to make the solar panels? (not sure if that was mentioned I was listening while working and don’t recall) What about the micro environmental effects done to the soil at these sites. They are finding that the soil basically dies around these sites? From everything that I’ve seen green energy is far from green

@dennistucker1153 3 года назад

Do the pros outweigh the cons? I think so. On the whole recycle thing, besides improvements to efficiency they need to improve solar cells for longevity(150+ years). Another very good video. Thanks Matt.

@UndecidedMF 3 года назад

Thanks, Dennis. I agree ... many angles that the tech can be improved on.

@VFatalis 3 года назад

@@UndecidedMF Don't expect big improvements. Law of diminishing returns.

@TELEVISIONARCHIVES 3 года назад

In about 5 years the price will be even lower and the technology will be twice as better. I want to go green so I've made many improvements to my home including a hybrid water heater but Solar is not a good option yet even in Florida

@dennistucker1153 3 года назад

@@TELEVISIONARCHIVES I was living in a place where they started with solar hot water. Later, the home owner got solar panels(3kW). Between these 2 items, it cut our energy expenses by 60%. It was a leased system, so no out of pocket.

@sharpie249 3 года назад

Great info. Does the waste and recycling costs you explain take in account batteries and other electronic components? Thanks

@coldtesla6212 3 года назад

No undecided here! Solar is fantastic, only one problem, filling the gaps, maybe a storage solution is close that is affordable.

@MDP1702 3 года назад

Batteries are getting there and EV's could also help in the long run.

@MrArtist7777 3 года назад

No question, solar power is the future of energy. Everyone should do a quick exercise and look at Google maps over any city or town in the U.S., and world, and see how much roof space there is and how few solar panels there are and imagine if every bit of every roof was covered with solar PV. We could easily produce the majority of our energy if we did this.

@iareid8255 3 года назад

Russell, no we cannot, it's so concentrated during a small part of the day. It is hugely disruptive to the grid due to that. Then there is the rather inconvenient fact that in winter, certainly at U.K. latitudes there is virtually nothing generated, What do you use then? It's use is offgrid for small loads that are not constrained by time such as my stand by genertaor and camper van batteries. For wholesale power generation it is very poor.

@MrArtist7777 3 года назад

@@iareid8255 Yes, we can and we will, just watch, both utilities and individual customers will continue to add solar to the point where it produces most of the power we need. Solar works just fine on cloudy, rainy days, it just produces less, I know, I worked for a U.K. company, in Loughborough, for many years, and lived in the U.K., on and off, for several years and even on cloudy winter days, the panels would produce. On those days, hydro and wind will make up the difference. I've never suggested we'll produce all of our power via solar but estimates are that we'll produce: ~50% via solar and the rest from wind and hydro, dependent on the region. I've spent the past 15 years working closely with power utilities around the world and every one of them are fully planning on implementing as much solar and possible, w/ battery backup, and add wind and hydro, in areas that make the most sense. Nuclear, coal and nat. gas are all phasing out.

@iareid8255 3 года назад

Russell, you do not seem to accept that unreliable renewables cannot produce a reliable grid. There is not a chance that having a power source that cannot load follow will work. Hydro is a good way but the available capacity is small for most countries. The very good reason that power utilities are utilising these poor sources of power is simply finacial incentives given by politicians who do not understand or care if they disrupt a perfectly stable grid with ubsuitable sources of power. There is a limit to how much asynchronous power with no inertia can be incorporated. I assume, with your power utility experience you understand asynchronism and inertia? I suggest you have a look here for real time and historic U.K. grid data:- www.gridwatch.templar.co.uk/ Note particularly the solar contribution for winter, virtually nothing and absolute zero when most required (as it is dark). Wind, too, can have long periods of very low output. So two factors, intermittent output and the need for conventional generation to balance the grid increase cost and reduce reliability. This balancing cost is steadily increasing as renewables are added. Frequency events have doubled in the last few years, another indication that the grid is less stable than before. Look forward to black out Britain

@MrArtist7777 3 года назад

@@iareid8255 Clearly, you do not understand what you're talking about and it's getting exhausting talking to fools who do 0% research and understand the facts. Fossil fuels are intermittent and will ALL be gone one day soon, in the meantime, they are killing over 4 million humans/year, causing millions of more health problems and killing our planet by rapidly warming it. Wind farms produce energy ~85% of the time and solar: ~50% of the time, we all know this so utilities add more capacity and store the excess for stormy days and night time, this is how they're doing it now and will continue long in the future. Yes, ALL of our power will one day come from solar, wind and hydro, just watch, it will happen. Some countries are already doing this, it's no pipe dream. The only thing that will black out Britain is fossil fuel pollution that would potentially destroy the island. Do yourself a favor and do some research before commenting on things you don't understand.

@iareid8255 3 года назад

Russell, you have not answered one of my points. As for not understanding the facts, I have very many years in the power industry and understand very well how generation and distribution works. Your fantasy world is just that and will not be able to run a grid reliably Fossil fuels have sustained life, not destriyed it, your way will set us back to medieval times with a far shorter life span and much worse health and prosperity. Where do you get the ide athat fossil fuels will be gone soon, no it is you that needs to do some real research and see what is sensible and practical. The world is not rapidly heating, that si so much hyperbole in the media. current increase is in the order of 0.014 degrees per decade The U.K. has been far warmer no more than three centuries ago, this is normal, climate varies naturally.

@frederick6886 3 года назад

Awesome video Matt!

@robtk3 3 года назад

Acknowledging that this video is specifically about solar panels, it should be noted that there is another type of solar power generation that should be part of the equation. Concentrated solar, simply put, uses mirrors/lenses and a collector, typically a container of molten sodium, powering a steam turbine. Obviously it's a centralized technology (as opposed to the distributive technology of solar panels) that would be best at servicing highly concentrated population areas such as large cities where solar panel "real estate" is limited. Broken/damaged mirrors/lenses would be simple to replace/recycle and, theoretically, the sodium stays hot enough overnight to continue supplying heat energy to the turbine. A few limitations to consider; water use (recycle?) and available land close to the serviced area (abandoned malls, industrial parks?).

@dkrconch 2 года назад

You fail to mention anything about maintenance, upkeep, and other costs. There’s much more to this.

@MaDcOw1986 3 года назад

Im not sure about the cost in the US, but here in the Philippines, the cost of the entire system plus installation would cost you as much paying 6-7 years worth of electric bills in one go.. Light monthly installment is not yet available, so it is not practical financially.