The Truth About The International Space Station 

'The Space Race' ULTIMATE SURVIVAL CHALLENGE (USC) ('Winners' get to have their species continue to exist further into future eternity) * Modern science claims that there have been 5 mass extinction events already on this Earth. * We might be in the 6th now due to Earth's magnetism issues. * Modern science also claims that the Sun will wipe out all life on this Earth one day if not even the entire Earth itself. Sure, a long time from now, but the destination is set like a way point on a journey. * Our spiral shaped galaxy is most probably collapsing in upon itself. * The universe always existed in some form and never had a beginning, the singular big bang theory is a fairy tale for various reasons. Galaxies come into existence, with eventually new life in them, which then those galaxies most probably collapse in upon themselves, 'bang', eventually generating a new galaxy with new life in it, eternally repeating. The universe is most probably going to always actively exist in some form and will not end in a big freeze. 'Winners' get to continue to survive potentially throughout all of future eternity. Good Luck Earthlings! Game On! (NOTE: In the event all life dies and goes extinct, this USC, as well as all of life itself, real and artificial, automatically become null and void as there would be no life left to care.) SURVIVAL HINT: Combining energy in all the ways that energy can be combined, and one would have all the things that could ever be created from combined energy. It's also like take a language and put it together in all the ways that language could be put together. Sure, one would get huge amounts of junk, but also the greatest wisdom and all the greatest speeches would be in there too. One just has to discern the greatest wisdom and greatest speeches from all the junk that could be expressed by that language. And what is 'language' anyway but energy combined in a certain form?

Perplexity isn't the first answer engine. It may be the first on mobile. Also, Microsoft Copilot is able to provide links, sources, and images.

Note to all: My comment posted for this thread has been hidden. To see it: 'Sort by' up above; Select 'Newest first'; Scroll down to this thread and select 'replies'. Enjoy. The Space Race is on.

Ignored the salyut7, mir2, why the iss was international. But nice nasa propaganda

Ignored apollo/soyuz as the first iss. Ignored salyut7 10yr run. The channel is a 🤡 show of bs americana

Anything political will be criticised, I think this video was mostly unbiased, but I do think that the general western audience recognises too little of how much the Soviets helped with spaceflight, where it is unfortunately assumed the space race had a decisive victor. This is a good video but there's nothing wrong with criticism as it is not just purely stating facts.

Great comment. Keyboard warriors that love to criticize other’s work are so annoying, rude, and utterly lack social skills. Those who genuinely offer a different perspective and point of view are welcomed by everyone. Those who just love to hate on someone’s work for no reason are just projecting. Free speech is free speech, it’s just too bad when some abuse the privilege of being born with that right. Better people than they made it possible for them to take that right for granted. They seem to forget the responsibilities that are intended to go with their rights. I’m sorry to say I do it myself often enough.

@@janfilby7086I don’t disagree, especially when viewing documentaries of the Soviet Space Program after so much Soviet information was made publicly accessible. I find it remarkable when authors can remind me of the humanity of Soviet engineers, that Soviet citizens lived with a fear of the West (along with a fear of their State), that Soviets took great pride in their achievements. The Soviet Empire was much more than just an evil machine that cranked out weaponry, bent on our destruction, which is what I had been indoctrinated into believing since I was a teenager in the 80s. Although to be fair, just because it was propaganda and indoctrination didn’t mean a lot of it wasn’t true. As the poet Billy Joel wrote, “The Russians love their children, too.” Ok, sorry, this got a little more dramatic than it needed to be.

Why? It's going great without them. The ISS has more crew capabilities than ever with three separate capsules and will go until the end of the decade. The Chinese have their own space station themselves. The long march 5 B would take a payload penalty if it took the modules to the ISS, anyway. I really don't see the problem.

​@@dl2839🤡

@@dl2839 You forgot to mention the part about how they simply can't be trusted on any level. They love to spy and lie, and they have zero hesitation about swiping and/or copying others technologies and intellectual properties. This all plays a very large role in why they were not allowed to join and it is actually not a big secret either...that information is out there to be looked into for anyone who cares to. No idea how anyone could view leaving them out as a big mistake. They don't innovate. They don't regulate. They don't...or didn't even have their own technology and ability to produce simple ball point pens, like, they literally had to have the ball tips imported from Germany and others until very recently, and that too is 100% factual and can be looked into as well.

Copyland would have abandoned the ISS already and made their own

@@dl2839Maybe technically, but it wouldn’t have hurt diplomatically to have the Chinese as a Freedom member, even if “Chinese” and “Freedom” generally don’t go well together. For example , it was good PR and really helped diminish people’s fears of the USSR to have the Apollo-Soyuz program during The Cold War. Who knows - it seems there is WAY less national pride nowadays with our younger generations, so any kind of joint effort with the Chinese would probably go unnoticed anyway. As long as their Amazon packages from China get shipped on time, they’ll have no concept or care of geopolitical issues.

0:26 nah its still an ai

​@@TeMpZ_Veggies really? Damn

That's what happens when you think you can be a friend of the US.

@@slimjim394sure buddy

@@slimjim394sure buddy

@@Hsa12354 You should get better informed. The Russian are not the one who started the conflict. Learn about Victoria Nuland and the 2014 coup.

@@ngamashaka4894 I looked into it and your right

Space stations have a limited lifespan. I do not know all the metrics of this. Space stations degrade. It seems like to a certain point it is more cost effective to launch a new module than to refurbish an old one.

I'd rather have all-new, but I like the idea of using the existing ISS as a place to live and work while the new station is being built as an annex to the original. Once completed, the 2 would separate and the new station would be the only one actively being used. Similar to staying in a camper next to the new house you're building.

They are kinda doing this. There is a private space station company founded by former NASA guys that have the rights to attach their modules to the ISS. Using it's life support at first, but then eventually having their own life support and detaching from the ISS at the end of it's life cycle.

Not possible because all the moduleaterials have no guarantees anymore ! The ISS .has done it and there is no any prolong for this famous orbital laboratory ! 2030 is it's final end ! Period !

The new space station is inflatable in space and can bring 3 times the capacity to a new station.

this is more accurate than the bs he calls an "explanation".

@@user-by2io7zv2t Thank you.

Yeah, and the need for reliability with no progress bit them in the ass in the long run.

Reliability? you are totally lost dude

@@viarnay have you seen Soviet space achievements compared to American?

​@@emmanoble6735 They literally launched the first satellite. No progress my ass.

@@user-by2io7zv2t Obviously..Soviet had their peak landing a probe on Venus but they didn't go further..

Most of this particular video is just American exceptionalism bs. Ignore most of the points on how "worse" the Russians were. Russia was on par to the US, and exceeded in most cases, especially on achievements.

There was history in MIR. And there was history in Skylab. That had suitable sized modules. Compare and realize how ridiculous ISS is. 🚀🏴‍☠️🎸

It's is, but competition combined collaboration would be better, maybe, like the people at the gym that amp you up

Dont like? Dont watch. Don't whine. Easy. Simple

@@desertstar223 I'm trying to help. I like the channel. I want it to be better. Just present the content and be honest with the titles.

@@BrianKelsay Dude, do you want the video titles to be written the way YOU like them? Start your own channel, write your own video titles. Problem solved. You're not helping by whining.

Maybe Russia should have joined with the EU and other nations rather than trying to revive the failed dead Soviet Union~? Shalom

@@politicsuncensored5617 but they are not reviving the Soviet Union, but simply making money from the war

@@politicsuncensored5617 You basic fool. You believe your own government propaganda and then repeat it on RU-vid. Basic. Russia tried to join the EU and Nato. Instead Nato kept playing cold war games. The impearlist West, projecting as always, supportiled by their poorly educated and easily misled populations.

@@politicsuncensored5617 Sure bro, you know how corrupted the West is. Our leaders are lying. Yet, you choose to believe them.

Yes, it has been considered by many individuals as well as private space companies.

Yeah the star lab space station is supposed to be launched on starship

It's been a long time But my time is finally near 🚀

The Americans were vastly behind the soviets during most of the space race. They only caught up after developing the Saturn 5, which was a miracle it got off the ground.

@@user-by2io7zv2t who's flag is on the moon?

@@lukehashbarger9936 Nobodys, because it's now white due to radiation.

@@user-by2io7zv2tThe Saturn V was one of the most successful rockets in all of space history. It never failed once, this was no accident, it’s good engineering and extensive testing.

Extensive testing is not completely correct, it's more like throwing random crap at a problem instead of finding a solution. NASA engineers have yet to resolve the issue of uneven pressure distribution, a frequent cause of engine explosions. Rather than investigating a solution, they attempted to counteract the problem by increasing the pressure of the fuel entering the nozzle cooler, leading to significant cost overruns amounting to 15 million dollars. This contrasts with Roscosmos, who had figured out that adding more, smaller combustion chambers solves the problem. Also, I didn't call it an accident.

1973

It was a different time. Nowadays we can see 16 different angles of Starship lifting off.....the booster coming back and even Starship reentering the atmosphere.....live as it's happening. There are probably a lot of still photos of astronauts working to put the ISS together......but keep in mind that those people were very busy and probably not a lot of time to take old fashioned video.

Actual professionals really don't care what silly little conspiracy theorists think in their mom's basement. It has no effect on the work they do

@@rickbase833 Like the moon pictures from the 60s and 70s?

@@jameshall1300 Loving personal attacks when NASA fans can't answer a simple question.

@@JohnDoe-ny1wp Yes.....the early landings were rough. Later missions had better quality.

Because it is in space? Also we sent people to the rock over there, that’s not in LEO.

I don't the think it is the right shape.

That wouldn't work...rotating ISS would be difficult to keep in orbit because it's basically falling towards earth at a slow pace and you need to push it up every now and then...also the rotation has to be quite fast in order to be 1G...there are reasons it's not done, it's whole impractical for the shape of the ISS, most of the proposed rotation artificial gravity generators or large diameter wheels because that works the best.

That would be problematic. In the astronauts are experiencing 1G, so would the various modules. The connections between the modules would need to hold the full weight of the modules, rather than just being strong enough to keep the air pressure in the modules from forcing them apart.

The ISS is too small to rotate and get 1g while also being a comfortable experience for the astronauts. That would also have made it more expensive, which is problematic for obvious reasons mentioned in the video.

It's a research ship that specifically was for zero-G experiments. The whole point was not for a replication of gravity. A new one that rotates ought to really be being built/sent up now though. A more understandable design flaw to point out would be there was no plan to push the ISS into a higher and more stable orbit to preserve it for future generations.

Some glaring errors for sure. Europe develops its space industry because frankly we don't altogether trust America.

Yes it needs electricity. It’s got two solar panels just for that

@@Wurtoz9643yes it needs electricity but it can still operated with out it.

yes

For the past 2-3 decades no one needs Russian help in space or anywhere else. That has been proven in Ukraine~! Shalom

How so Karen? Shalom

*pegged

Yo?