No video :(

''The Truth is I am Guilty of Being a Fraud.'' | Mike Ross' Closing Statement | Suits

Подписаться 459 тыс.

Просмотров 1,6 млн

50% 1

Mike rips up his prepared closing argument and speaks from the heart about how he is a fraud. Gibbs, unmoved by this display, makes her closing argument: Mike is a liar and this is not a victimless crime.
Mike delivers his closing argument, and now it's time to wait for the jury's verdict. Will the jury find Mike Ross guilty or not guilty?
Stream full seasons on Peacock: pck.tv/46kqJxO
Season 5, Episode 15 "Tick Tock": Louis considers Anita Gibbs' offer of immunity; Rachel advises Mike on how to win over the people in the courtroom; Donna begs Harvey not to do anything rash.
Your favorite shows, movies and more are here. Stream now on Peacock: www.peacocktv.com
This is the official RU-vid channel for Suits: home to all the swagger, smarts and sexiness from Pearson Hardman - one of the top New York law firms that hire solely from Harvard law. Well, almost entirely.
Subscribe for more Suits: bit.ly/2maVymH
Buy Suits Complete Series DVD Now: bit.ly/2paFnay
#Darvey #SUITSOFFICIAL #Suits #LouisLitt #GabrielMach #HarveySpecter #DonnaPaulsen #LegalDrama #Lawyers #Peacock #Peacocktv

Опубликовано:

22 авг 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 327

@Suits 3 года назад

Mike delivers his closing argument, and now it's time to wait for the jury's verdict. Will the jury find Mike Ross guilty or not guilty?

@aliibn-muhammadal-sharif8568 3 года назад

By far one the best drama series ever created! Nothing can simply come even close! Love Suites, amazing storyline.

@snsufian168 Год назад

@@aliibn-muhammadal-sharif8568 can you tell me which episode is this and the season no.

@thekingofnoobs8362 Год назад

@@snsufian168 I believe the 2nd to last episode of season 5

@MegaTkls Год назад

One guy in the jury found him not guilty, think he was a mechanic

@thekingofnoobs8362 Год назад

@@MegaTkls yes it was a mechanic

@sanathshetty2870 3 года назад

Mike played to his strengths and was spot on, he had the jury convinced , if only he believed in himself and didn't give in

@martinkeogh4003 3 года назад

Didn’t really have the jury convinced when only the foreman backed him as not guilty and that was only Beacuse he believed Gibbs didn’t make her case

@lunaballesano6410 3 года назад

I don't think he convinced them he attended Harvard. He did convince them he should be a lawyer though, which is much better. Also, I think Mike on some level wanted to be found guilty (without going to jail). the constant guilt and the feeling of being stuck he was feeling could only go away if he took responsibility for not attending law school, and he knew that.

@utkarshmahajan9609 3 года назад

He did it becoz even if he walked out free, she would come after everyone else over and over. This way she would back off

@julionero6380 3 года назад

@@utkarshmahajan9609 not really, if he was found innocent with what argument would they try to put in jail harvey or jessica?

@4cryingoutloud976 3 года назад

But he ended up being a real lawyer because of it. So that’s that.

@rabronin Год назад

If I was in the jury I would have been with their verdict thinking: "There's no way I'm putting this guy behind bars!"

@spideyverse2352 Год назад

They didn't, Mike lost faith in himself and took a deal

@rabronin Год назад

@@spideyverse2352 Read the comment again, I already know...

@wholeNwon Год назад

Then you would have nullified? Faithless juror?

@scottmatheson3346 10 месяцев назад

@@wholeNwon jury nullification is the entire reason we have the jury system. it is the most ancient duty of the jury.

@wholeNwon 10 месяцев назад

@@scottmatheson3346 And yet, nullification of charges is not among the verdicts that juries are allowed to deliver. In fact, attorneys general and prosecutors are shielded from liability when they inappropriately charge individuals.

@rajatthedronzer 2 года назад

One thing I noticed is, the jury foreman who informed Harvey of the verdict, was having his arms free while listening to Mike, but at the time of Anita, he had his arms folded. Generally, whenever someone have their arms folded in front of you while you talk, they are generally NOT in a receptive mood. Nice little psychology detail. :)

@gijuki1335 2 года назад

I take it you are an licensed psychologist and not just some Stud posing as one?

@jmurphy6011 2 года назад

That's been proven to be a very overrated method of rating receptiveness.

@macweldon6643 2 года назад

Nice catch, I never noticed that. The REID technique is nonsense in real life but the writers probably did do this on purpose to show his feelings.

@drath5679 2 года назад

@@gijuki1335 They may not be but my wife is a clinical psychologist and this is something she looks for, she consistently tells me that people close themselves off by protecting their core.And it's not until they relax that they take away that shield that is their arms.

@icarlos4035 2 года назад

Except this particular jury guy wanted Mike found guilty, if I understood that scene correctly

@buzzerbeater37 3 года назад

Prosecutors are supposed to give their closing arguments first.

@hilaryhongkong 2 года назад

Mike: ''The Truth is I am Guilty of Being a Fraud.'' Prosecution: "He's a liar!"

@ganeshravinath1448 2 года назад

Lawyered

@Abwehr9 2 года назад

"My opponent is a liar and he cannot be trusted"

@balancemaster55 2 года назад

@@Abwehr9 I member

@BH_Restorative_fitness 2 года назад

My opponent is a liar and can’t be trusted.

@veronicanaumov2981 Год назад

So your saying he is a lawyer 😂 I’m kidding i’ve watched the show but your comment makes it sound like she’s saying he’s a lawyer.

@basbarbeque6718 3 года назад

A man posing as a pilot likely doesn't know how to fly a plane, so fearing one getting behind the stick is a valid concern. A man posing as a doctor will never even get close to an operating table. Mike posed as a Lawyer, but he actually knew what he was doing, at this point in the show he practically was a lawyer, just not legally

@ujjwal7502 3 года назад

Sorry I didn't watch the show, whats the story here, why didn't he go to college? Looks like he's pretty smart probably would've gotten a full scholarship.

@basbarbeque6718 3 года назад

@@ujjwal7502 He had originally planned to go to law school, but under pressure he memorised a math test and tried to sell it (ending up selling it to the Dean's daughter) He actually had a scholarship iirc, but lost it after the Dean told Harvard what he did

@khalilrahme5227 3 года назад

@@ujjwal7502 he cheated, got caught, got kicked out of college and lost his scholarship. It's a bit far fetched tbh, weak premise but the show is amazing nontheless

@Solidefex 2 года назад

@@khalilrahme5227 As far as I know he never got kicked out. He just couldn't afford law school without a scholarship. You would probably really lose your scholarship if you did sell tests. So I wouldn't say it's weak or far fetched maybe just the fact that it's only mentioned once and even there it feels like a side note. Which it technically is i guess.

@noahdrake2638 2 года назад

@@Solidefex he was kicked out. And the Dean called Harvard and they pulled his offer.

@Yasuki.Eilhart 3 года назад

Gibbs, Gibbs is undeniably amazing, you can't but admire her because no matter how amazing Mike's speech was, she had the skills to make it all turn into ash, brilliant writing.

@sslaw6 3 года назад

lol how? He was found not guilty

@spudnic8081 3 года назад

@@sslaw6 this happened before

@faanc6770 2 года назад

She was horrendous. She managed to lose against Mike even tho she had every single proof in the world to win.

@lorenzomei158 2 года назад

@@sslaw6 you know this is fiction right? If Mike's case was real NONE in their right mind would pledge him not guilty

@sslaw6 2 года назад

@@lorenzomei158 he's clearly not guilty the dude admitted that's how the jury voted

@walidprinco7268 2 года назад

And when she labels him as a “fraud” and sounded like a gunshot, very powerful indictment, it, seemingly, shakes the floor under Harvey and Mike..

@harjassingh1351 3 года назад

This shows how much Mike has grown from s1

@letsengagemense5507 3 года назад

This is where he got to the jury, the plaintiff was just giving her closing but it was over 🤣🤣

@asinineintentions7773 2 года назад

You say that like the jury was on his side. They all knew he was guilty, the foreman only made them not say guilty because gibbs didn't prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he was guilty.

@Dave_Langer Год назад

@@asinineintentions7773 "because gibbs didn't prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he was guilty." UM you know what is how the court case works right lol Even if you know someone is guilty, if the prosecution doesn't prove their case, you have to vote not guilty.

@scottmatheson3346 10 месяцев назад

@@asinineintentions7773 that makes him literally innocent under the law. you are legally innocent untim proven guilty, even if you actually did it.

@metal87power 2 года назад

The point is I can't trust a single word he says not because he is a fraud, but because he is a lawyer and he can turn the honest truth into a weapon.

@mmccrownus2406 Год назад

Umm the prosecutor is different?????????

@brianfreeman2200 Год назад

Fun part is. If they pretended to be lawyers everyone would fail. Mike actually understands the law. That's what makes his gift something worth investing in

@ojurerekingsley7307 2 года назад

There should be a record of him applying and getting in at the very least! He had a letter when Rachel was still applying

@charlesdavis545 Год назад

That's what everyone keeps forgetting, that he never attended Harvard, when in fact he did. He got kicked out because he sold a test to the Deans daughter. There was even a flashback showing that very incident. Even if you didn't finish college, there would be records of you attending.

@chanachon56 11 месяцев назад

@@charlesdavis545 That flashback wasn't him at Harvard. It was at his local college, getting ready to transfer to Harvard on scholarship. Unfortunately, the math test fiasco happened aaaaaand the dean of said college notified Harvard, causing them to rescind his scholarship and the rest is history.

@yusufahmed3014 3 года назад

Gibbs was an underrated character

@lucho_lucero 3 года назад

she was, next to the early seasons Hardman, the best antagonist.

@ayush6025 3 года назад

No.

@khalilrahme5227 3 года назад

@@lucho_lucero I prefer the likes of tanner and fortsman, they didn't get as much screen time as Hardman though

@arminxvs3372 Год назад

Underrated? I think most people would agree she was Top-3 antagonists of this show.

@Montages-yc6js 2 года назад

She Said that there were no record of an application but he got accepted so shes capping

@alessiopibiri3087 3 года назад

Literal chills

@gamingtutorials7102 3 года назад

The best closing statement ever in the History

@nathanprincewill9173 2 года назад

Raymond Redington says Hi

@JM-db8ez 2 года назад

@@nathanprincewill9173 Alan Shore says hello.

@vishalseth3178 3 года назад

Why do you post these stuffs, to make us nostalgic??

@sleeves09 3 года назад

To rewatch the whole show again.

@diasbaikenov8327 3 года назад

Every word he says is more than just the truth, so many people who are not gratuated from high school can help the others. They can teach you better, they can actually be your doctor or your lawer, they can help you get thorough so many problems! Mike is definetly not a fraud, everyone deserves the second chance and I'm just so happy that thouse 12 people ended up founding him innocent...

@mynames7664 3 года назад

true but he's still a fraud

@sinuslebastian6366 3 года назад

I'm not so sure about the doctor part. Would you want your heart surgery to be done by a professional or a high school dropuot just because he gave you his word??

@mrragaman7270 3 года назад

@@sinuslebastian6366 I think it depends...if the doctor are expert and have the same skillset as Mike I would go with it...but if not then never...

@PrimoStracciatella 3 года назад

It's one thing to find out the hard way that your taxi driver doesn't have a license, but finding out that you lost in court because your lawyer isn't a lawyer is something else. Mike seems to be better than many real lawyers, and all is well as long as he wins, but if he doesn't...

@PrimoStracciatella 3 года назад

@@mynames7664 technically yes

@pranavmehrotra2849 3 года назад

1:29 is that the Blue ranger from SPD😂😂

@mrkajit9211 3 года назад

He is on a secret mission .... Don't tell anyone

@a2hazardous525 3 года назад

Gibbs had it out for Mike and Harvey

@adennis200 2 года назад

The da was so terrible Mike confessed to being a froad and still she tried to argue by basically repeating her accusations and saying that he didn't do this and that. Her arguments were so weak. You can't win a jury by simply stating some facts, you need to sell a story and no matter how guilty he actually was, he sold his story.

@profchaos91 2 года назад

Yeah but she played with his emotions and later on basically bluffed him into submission even though he was gonna be absolved. So, a terriboe closing statement, but she was ahead of him by a mile at this point

@brewer7290 3 года назад

Best arc of Suits

@IIIISai 3 года назад

Agreed

@sarayugenny8125 3 года назад

The best lawyers I know in the world Harvey n mike

@romaricfranque2247 3 года назад

Shouldn't the defendant closing statement be last ?

@Toninho_Marques 3 года назад

I asked myself the same question!!

@anthonyiuculano6002 2 месяца назад

Not in New York.

@manzoa2 3 года назад

I feel like the show should've let them go to jury. Since the first season they always settle and going to jury would've made mike feel like a lawyer win or lose.

@sinuslebastian6366 3 года назад

See that's the thing, they can't show him coming out of this victorious. Its a very well written dilemma for the audience. You like Mike and want him to be found innocent, but deep down you also know that what he did is fraud and he deserves it. As Gibbs said, if they let the jury find him innocent, it would set a precedent for future frauds to be let off scot free as well.

@lunaballesano6410 3 года назад

@@gatheringtub63 But Mike isn't the only character in this show, and the last seasons were decent as well

@scottmatheson3346 10 месяцев назад

@@sinuslebastian6366 in fact it wouldn't set any precedent at all, since juries don't set precedents and all a not guilty verdict would have done is confirm the prosecution didn't prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt. and you may think he deserves punishment, but the show could very well have had him get away with it - making him oj would have been an interesting twist.

@poker8100 10 месяцев назад

I’m not seeing how Gibbs is the bad person here. She’s just trying to prevent a fraud

@user-bk7vj4vz2e 6 дней назад

She wasn’t a bad person, just super unlikeable

@ChickenJoe12 2 года назад

Didn’t mike get an acceptance letter from Harvard while he was at an undergrad college though ? So wouldn’t there be a record of him going there and getting kicked out? Big part of the show that didn’t make sense to me

@phrophetsamgames 2 года назад

I'm pretty sure they messed with Harvard records sometime in the early seasons.

@barakmosgrove 2 года назад

A great Catch Me If You Can reference during Anita’s argument. Pretend to be a doctor or a pose as a pilot… Sounds like Frank Abagnale…

@xqiuvmah Год назад

Mike has to be found guilty for the very reasons the prosecutor mentioned. If he is acquitted of this crime, that creates a precedent and can allow anyone in similar situations to claim the same, but with potentially disastrous outcomes. There is a reason certain professions require licenses. Now I believe we should change the licensing standards so that anyone can take the test, but the test is much more difficult and a better representation of real life.

@ka124as Год назад

Aren’t you able to defend yourself in court currently? Correct me if I’m wrong.

@xqiuvmah Год назад

@Kevin C representing yourself is not the same as claiming to be a lawyer and representing others that give you large amounts of money. Besides, it is almost always better to have an attorney representing you than to try and represent yourself. It is the difference between pulling out an aching tooth with a pair of pliers yourself and going to the dentist. One choice is obviously smarter than the other, even if sometimes the bad choice does work. With Mike, it would be like going to a man who never went to dentistry school but claimed to be a dentist. Imagine the damage he could do.

@mikekasich836 Год назад

The difference is that anyone else in that position wouldn't be able to pull it off because they wouldn't be able to know all of the laws and know all of the stuff

@josephbrambil2868 Год назад

but it does not create a precedent. Jury's do not create precedent. Only appellate courts do. Jury's are finders of fact and decided if the facts of one specific case violated the law the judge instructs the jury to follow. If mike was found innocent, there is nothing that would stop a jury from finding someone else guilty of the same crime.

@Dave_Langer Год назад

Not how it works. She didnt prove her case, if it happened again they could have proven their case.

@scottulbrich5376 2 года назад

In NY you dont need a college degree to practice law, just to pass the bar

@Dave_Langer Год назад

He never passed the bar for himself.

@unrulynut3960 Год назад

If a man who is not a lawyer manages to do the job much better than the actual lawyers, what does that say about the lawyers?

@2023JCWMINICOOPER 11 месяцев назад

It means that he is not a lawyer. Period.

@scottmatheson3346 10 месяцев назад

@@2023JCWMINICOOPER non sequitur. don't let your emotions get in the way of your analysis.

@PapaDeusVult 2 года назад

A bit late to the party, and somebody probably already said this. But, I don't know if it was intentional from the showrunners and scriptwriters, but Anita Gibbs listing down what a fraud could potentially pose as for the day (Lawyer, Doctor, Pilot) is very reminiscent of Leonardo DiCaprio's character in the film Catch Me If You Can (2003). If intentional, that's neat. If not, nice coincidence :)

@ndcollins 2 года назад

I had the same thought... and in both cases, Mike Ross and Frank Abignale, they both studied and passed the bar. IMHO, who cares if you have that piece of paper that says you paid a lot to sit in a bunch of classes for X number of years? If you are able to pass the test that determines if you learned what you were supposed to during that time, you should qualify. If the test is easy enough that an average layman can just take it and pass it, then it is a worthless test to begin with.

@EdwardRock1 Год назад

More like 2002

@goleac_ Год назад

What I never understood was why did the Mike go first and Gibbs go last? Normally, in a criminal case in most common-law jurisdictions, the prosecution goes first and the defence goes afterwards. Thought it was weird for them to switch the order.

@EthanNyx Год назад

This speech just makes me think of Catch me if you Can, the DiCaprio movie. (The one the Prosecutor gives)

@rohanmahajan3008 3 года назад

Did anyone else noticed there is a power ranger in the jury?😂😂

@davidkoretzkij230 2 года назад

i dont see it???

@4cankursharma 2 года назад

SPD EMERGENCY!!!

@duwardee__6428 3 года назад

The best show ever.

@shivinunitholi2493 Год назад

If self-taught programmers could be hired by big tech companies for their skills, why not have a gifted law guy like Mike continue his practice as a lawyer. Of course, this was fiction but I'm curious otherwise.

@ktan8 Год назад

Wonder what one would think if their doctor says he was self taught…

@nebunezz_r Год назад

@@ktan8Didn't Ross passed his BAR exam?? If he had a license that stated such, regardless of prior education he is a lawyer through and through no? It's a coincidence that Ross out of all people understands the law and the art of Defending his clients.

@chanachon56 11 месяцев назад

@@nebunezz_rHe passed the bar exam for other people. He only got into the bar legitimately later on in the show

@scottmatheson3346 10 месяцев назад

for most of our nation's history you could practice law without a law degree. but we have moved towards licensing requirements as a means of quality control.

@Drifter1989 7 месяцев назад

@@ktan8except practicing law isn’t a physical job like practicing medicine and plus in this case Mike is back by one of the biggest law firms in NYC so you know he’s the real deal. He’s not just some guy practicing out of his house. Law school is a waste of money if you already know everything so that’s why people should be able to skip ahead and prove their knowledge to the state bar for their law license. Had Mike just had that choice from the start, his lack of education wouldn’t be an issue because he already proved his worth to the state bar.

@Animefan1803 2 года назад

What i always found amazing is that as someone standing in front of a judge, you got the right to defend yourself without a lawyer. When you think about it Lawyer is a bizarre job to be in need of a qualification simply because laws in generel are supposed to be understood by society. Hence while a studied Top university Lawyer should rip apart any hogposh rando. Mike had shown he´s more than capable to play a Lawyers game and do it so well, he worked for one of the best law firms and no one even suspected him of being a fraudster for a long, long time.

@avrilfan0521 2 года назад

That's why I dont understand the job itself or why Mike is wrong here. Ultimately being a lawyer is an overpriced certificate for understanding how society functions and the knowledge of its intricate parts are horded by elite people who can pay for that peice of paper. It dosnt really make sense.

@MS-bm2sd 2 года назад

@@avrilfan0521 also, do you realy know human being who has memory like Mike? Maybe one in million. I can say that I whould be great surgeon because I can learn how to operate perfectly. But that is insane and impossible.

@avrilfan0521 2 года назад

@@MS-bm2sd yes and no. Operating does require hand eye coordination is essential for being a surgeon and someone claiming( say fraudulently) to be a surgeon isn't necessarily saying that they are a diagnostician. It only because the education of doctors requires immense wide ranging knowledge that it would be difficult for you(possibly) but not for a character like mike.

@Drifter1989 7 месяцев назад

Basically in a nutshell, people only go to college for an overpriced certificate despite the fact much of what they learn can be learned by themselves. Practicing law isn’t a physical job like practicing medicine, so yeah it’s pretty bs most states hold people back from becoming lawyers due to the requirement of law school.

@scorpion1429 2 года назад

What world are they in? Defense generally gets the final close.

@lpolarisl219 4 месяца назад

I could never understand why Mike of all people, with his photographic memory, needs to have a paper of his speach. Is it a blunder from the makers of the show, or is he actually manipulating the jury into thinking his speech was improvised ?

@elzilchojd 3 года назад

Combos: i hit 'em. Resets... i got those!!!!

@shashwatshrey9248 3 года назад

I hated her the most. She got off easy in the end, didn't like that tbh. I wanted that lawyer to go down hard!

@daiyansajid2122 2 года назад

3:32 catch me if you can reference

@davidtaylor5519 3 месяца назад

The music the whole season was so well done

@sch1030 2 года назад

I didn't notice it then, but now that I'm seeing this again.... isn't that Sky, the blue ranger from power rangers SPD on the jury?

@erikvitela4849 3 месяца назад

So what

@chic-fil-ashouldopenonsund3623 Год назад

in other words, people like anita would let actual crooked, incompetent lawyers with actual licenses roam free causing way more misery than a licenseless lawyer who has helped right a lot of wrongs the justice system has committed.

@charlesdavis545 Год назад

They keep stating he didn't go to college, but he did go to Harvard; he got kicked out for selling the Dean's daughter a test. They would still have records of him having attended.

@aasimmoulvi5688 3 года назад

i saw blue ranger from power rangers SPD 1:30

@krisgaines3661 Год назад

I haven't watched all of this show, but if his claim that he passed the bar was in fact legitimate, it doesn't matter one bit if he went to Law School. Law is one of the only professions you can fully study on your own for. If you can pass the bar in your state, you can be a lawyer. It's really that simple. So, even if he hadn't passed the bar, he obviously could very easily and it would make the whole case of fraud illegitimate...unless the case is about him pretending to go to a certain school...

@jangelaclough5457 Год назад

That's what I'm confused about too. Because in the beginning he claims he took the bar exam but during this they say he didn't pass the bar. Are there other aspects to getting a lawyer degree besides passing the exam? And why is it necessary to go to a college if you can prove you already have the qualifications to pass their exam? In my mind, it's a form of gatekeeping and locking the job behind the law school pay wall

@krisgaines3661 Год назад

@jangelaclough5457 in actual reality in many states you can become a lawyer with no university. All you need is your bar and connections.

@jangelaclough5457 Год назад

@@krisgaines3661 then I'm so confused. He said he passed the bar exam but they keep saying he never passed the bar. What's up with that?

@krisgaines3661 Год назад

@jangelaclough5457 as far as I know, haven't watched the show fully...Mike passed the Bar. Which means he's legitimately able to be a lawyer. The issue is they all lied and said he went to a specific school to prepare for said Bar exam. He did not ever go to any law school and is self taught. So, he's legally allowed to be a lawyer, but his claims of going to a certain uni are false which poses ALL SORTS OF PROBLEMS.

@jangelaclough5457 Год назад

@@krisgaines3661 looked it up, surprised you need proof of eligible college for most states. However, there are currently 4 states that have ways of avoiding law school by using an apprenticeship

@sl3966 2 года назад

I'm honestly not sure at this point why Mike hasn't done a Kim K and "read for the law" the man has the knowledge and skill to be a lawyer. I'm in the Robert Barnes camp on this one. There should not be a licensing board to be a lawyer. If you can pass the bar and practice then what's the big deal about the Bar? I've won more than 10 cases Pro Se against debt collectors and landlords and actual lawyers for insurance companies. Why am I allowed to go it alone Pro Se but he gets punished for not having gone to law school and passing the Bar?

@usmanqureshi8941 Год назад

I think the bar is supposed to look into character and stuff too

@nostalgia545 Год назад

I think only in California you can do that

@sl3966 Год назад

@@nostalgia545 Yeah and that is ridiculous, that's the only thing Cali has gotten right IMO.

@nostalgia545 Год назад

@@sl3966 I agree, everyone should have the right to learn the law outside of school. I actually think every degree should be like this. If you can pass multiple exams on subjects but not attend the school you should get the degree

@usmankhalid9370 3 года назад

Does anyone know the name of theme/ music at the ending?

@user-mi6xz5wp7y 11 месяцев назад

'I don't just take a snapshot of something'. Hmmmmm. That's weird because in one episode Mike memorized a piece of paper that he pushed onto the floor and looked at for a few seconds and then was able to re-type it from memory!

@fakeaccount4092 3 года назад

Wish these people would admit it so I can move on in life lol!!!

@brandona2023 3 года назад

Idk how she equating faking being a lawyer, to faking being a doctor

@xtehmoonlight7400 3 года назад

both requires professional license to practice, she make a correct comparison though if you hate the comparison, how about we take another profession, lets say engineer would you take engineering advice to build your house from certififed engineer or some rando on the street claiming "i know everything about engineering but i dont go school, trust me bruh"

@parryxxlivxx 3 года назад

@@xtehmoonlight7400 But we do know that Mike is actually competent. He passed the bar, which is the one thing that determines if he can practice law in a state - that surpasses the law school situation. He did prove that he had the knowledge/skill that the state mandates. He just didn’t have the official paperwork proving so legally. If the same could be said for your engineer, then yes I would take his advice. But still, surely you must agree that you can’t compare that engineer or doctor to someone like Mike

@PrimoStracciatella 3 года назад

@@parryxxlivxx Did he pass the bar? I thought he didn't.

@paulgospels4528 3 года назад

Coz she has to discredit Mike's point to achieve her goal. Anything to get to the jury. That's her job

@parryxxlivxx 3 года назад

@@PrimoStracciatella He did, on a bet - he said it in the first episode, in his job interview with Harvey; someone bet him (a thousand dollars I think) that he couldn’t pass the bar it without going to law school. I’m guessing he didn’t do it in his own name though so he didn’t get the credit for it

@jay-el8tn 3 года назад

Mike means business when the hair is slicked back

@skeetorretard Год назад

The truth is that poor lawyers can't help anyone. once you make a couple of million dollars then you can start helping the little man.

@scottmatheson3346 10 месяцев назад

faye richardson has entered the chat

@kylehahn4410 Год назад

Tbf, lawyers needing to go to law school is more of a superficial restriction they imposed on themselves to keep their profession exclusive. If it was about being capable and knowing enough about the law, passing the BAR should be enough, but instead they put up a paywall via tuition for law school.

@nicholasdorah8820 Год назад

My questions for Trevor are. In the time that Mike was living with you in New York did you see him reading law books? The answer is yes. Did you see him working on a case? yes Did he tell you that he was in Law School? yes but I though it was to impress a girl. Did Mike go away for hours at a time? Yes he said he was going to visit his grandmother. Is it possible that when he was away he didn't go to see his grandmother? Yes. Is it possible that he took a train to Boston for the day when he said he was visiting his grandmother? Yes or I don't know.

@randomchannel-px6ho 6 месяцев назад

The show is extremely enjoyable thanks to terrific acting but this is around the point the plot becomes really really contrived. They were having their cake and eating it too

@eduardorosique2613 Год назад

"i identify as a lawyer"

@yerossyle Год назад

Still can’t believe they found him not guilty.

@mediocre_etrnl Год назад

They knew he is a fraud. But they also saw the fact that he is capable of doing this job better than most of “actual” lawyers

@ka124as Год назад

I didn’t watch it, but what specifically was the charge?

@nebunezz_r Год назад

Because he's only guilty if he had a bad record, so far Mike Ross has been an exceptional lawyer for his client. Why wouldn't they declare not guilty when he's the best out there??

@Dave_Langer Год назад

Bc she didnt prove her case.

@salmanpandey8150 10 месяцев назад

he was treated as an exception, like a super human who has powers of being lawyer better than normal human

@TheGekkoGuy 2 года назад

If I am Mike Ross, I will close my statement with “Even I’m a fraud, just think how top flight firm like Pearson Specter can hired me? I’ve never met Harvey and Jessica until I got hired by Harvey in one interview, start as associate and assistant to Harvey since Harvey has became new senior partner…”

@hunteriwingon5988 2 года назад

The stupidity of this statement baffles me

@sumanthmuniganti2394 2 года назад

Welcome to Danbury prison

@TheGekkoGuy 2 года назад

@@sumanthmuniganti2394 💀

@williamwinkelmann8554 Год назад

For anybody who ever saw this but was just a fan of the other mike ross, i find the caption of this hilarious.

@Thelazertagkid Месяц назад

I loved this show and I always found it funny this scene made me realize that Mike Ross is very loosely based Frank Abagnale Jr. aka Leonardo DiCaprio’s character in Catch me if you can as he was a fake pilot and a fake doctor, but technically legally a lawyer as he’d passed the BAR though he didn’t really follow through on being one. Anyway, love the vid.

@geekonomist Год назад

Imagine discovering that the man who is about to do "X" is actually competent, and did not require a diploma to become competent?

@americansmark 7 месяцев назад

Why are they approaching the jury? That would get you tackled and held in contempt in any court.

@BABA-bk3ct Год назад

Jury has the blue ranger sitting in it

@chrisselasky295 10 месяцев назад

The sense I got from Gibbs is her closing started with facts but the problem is she used too many hypotheticals with setting a precedent. Also she came across as talking down to the jury in her closing.

@rosies14 Год назад

Gibbs says there is no proof of any application to law school but he received his letter of acceptance to Harvard

@odisseusrh Год назад

Her argument is flawed, since he does have the knowledge and yes now experience of being a lawyer. The only thing he doesn't have is a every expensive piece of paper saying he's one

@Sentosaman 2 года назад

Throw away the keys and chuck all of them in the slammer! 😎

@danser_theplayer01 Год назад

"I am a fraud that actually knows law so I kinda am an attorney but not really but I can do my job" this is what I think of him.

@allindiachannel2290 Год назад

After ages i saw blue spd power ranger, i didn't notice when i watched that episode.1.31

@jraguinaldo5073 2 года назад

It's a gift that everyone has.

@georgehaze 11 месяцев назад

Did they ever get around to explaining why Anita Gibbs hated Mike so passionately? If so then I missed it.

@TPPerspectiv 2 года назад

Fascinating!

@alexhaynes7220 7 месяцев назад

Mike should of never gone to jail at all

@lw4533 3 года назад

If I was on the jury, I would find him not guilty, even though it's clear he's a fraud. He's likeable lol.

@maxjohnson65 3 года назад

If I recall correctly, they DID find him not guilty but Mike took a deal instead so he never actually heard what the Jury's decision would have been.

@SergioHernandez-ut8lb 3 года назад

@@maxjohnson65 yep, he was too afraid of it so he made a deal, Harvey later found out that only one person of the jury found him guilty

@EricTheSwede 3 года назад

And that's a problem.

@maxjohnson65 3 года назад

@@SergioHernandez-ut8lb As I recall, only one person on the jury found him INNOCENT, not guilty. And he described the situation to Harvey as a 12 angry men case where he eventually got all the jurors on board with declaring Mike innocent.

@sinuslebastian6366 3 года назад

Max Johnson yeah, that means at the end the whole jury was on board and found him not guilty and hence the undeclared verdict. Have you seen 12 angry men??

@nelson617 2 года назад

Best scene

@alexhaynes7220 7 месяцев назад

Why did he give in and say that he is and that he has went and gone to jail and prison 😮😮😢😢

@puzazhenthi1279 Год назад

He identifies as a lawyer lol 😂

@EdwardRock1 Год назад

Translawyer

@scottmatheson3346 10 месяцев назад

and he is right.

@DraxXThanos 11 месяцев назад

"Im guilty for being a dwarf"

@anthonyhalim4709 Год назад

soundtrack 1:09

@snyggmikael Год назад

Why because he didn't pay an extreme amount of money to a institution that's mostly there to put people in debt? Or the institution that make people memorize a bunch of old books and regurgitate it back? A lawer is not the same a s a doctor, neither is most jobs. Thr comparison was moronic at best.

@roccopezone8414 4 месяца назад

Season and episode?

@gothadritha13 Год назад

2:46 not true. He went to college. He was just kicked out and never graduated.

@iwantsifegold Год назад

here is where the problem is with the prosecution; you hired Karen and a bunch of New Yorkers who work in the service industry and others and demanded as it to see the manager over victimless crime to stick it to her personally. They are not gonna find him guilty

@CertifiedFresh7 Год назад

I would never trust a doctor that didn't go to medical school, but anyone can be a lawyer as long as they know the law and can be persuasive.

@blutz6966 Год назад

Your logic seems to be self-contradictory. Anyone could become a doctor as long as they know all about medicine or any other profession by that logic. Yet, you don’t trust a fraud doctor but would do so when it’s a lawyer.

@scottsound4711 Год назад

@@blutz6966 All that is required to know the law is 😂

@spencerpencer Год назад

as already noted, your comment makes zero sense

@scottmatheson3346 10 месяцев назад

@@blutz6966 the work product of doctors is less subject to vetting than that of lawyers, you have to trust doctors on faith more, whereas every tiny detail of a lawyer's performance is recorded. so it makes sense to make some distinction between the professions.

@HiteshkrSingh 2 месяца назад

Did anyone notice SPD Blue ranger

@Adrian-ju2ue 3 года назад

Which episide and season is this?

@JacksMod Год назад

The female juror in the white shirt was also an extra in the diner scene with Harvey and Louis in S6 EP13, sorry blame my ADHD

@PrankHouseClark Год назад

obviously this is a show, but the court defended or other party cant directly look and talk to the jury.

@Colmenero444 Год назад

There is no way in any court that a jury is gonna be in favor of the defendant on this case. Not to mention the FBI, FCC, IRS, state department would desolve the firm. I get its a show but come on.

@Dave_Langer Год назад

They have to since the prosecution couldn't prove their case. We all know OJ was guilty but he got off bc the didn't make their case

@scottmatheson3346 10 месяцев назад

so you say, in a comment section full of people who would vote to acquit him, all people who could land on a jury. maybe you are overconfident in your ability to read a aituation ...

@Colmenero444 10 месяцев назад

@scottmatheson3346 a comment section could, but feelings rather than evidence doesn't not aquite someone being charged of a crime. And if he was a quited then anyone can lie their way in being lawyer. Degrees would have no merit.

@Dave_Langer 10 месяцев назад

@@Colmenero444 You are missing the point. The point is the prosecution didn't prove their case. Thats why they would have found him not guilty