The ULTIMATE 2D Zelda Retrospective 

Miyamoto-san has clearly never played Super Mario Sunshine😂😂😂

I'll see what I can do

On every game, or a few specific ones?

I think you mean Ocarina of Time is the most overrated, and its fanboys are absolutely insufferable.

@@TheRealNintendoKid OOT is objectively better than most of rest of the franchise (only Majora, BotW and ALBW are better overall), the entire industry still follows it's design philosophy when it comes single player 3D gaming and it's aged better than most games that came after it. People who try to take down the game are typically contrarians with bad taste (like the folks at Game Grumps or numerous gaming RU-vidrs).

I've yet to play OOT. I'm gonna play it soon, I'm getting bored of TOTK and BOTW lol. I'm old enough that i played LOZ when it was new in 1987, and the open world adventure blew my little child mind, even tho i had nothing to compare it to. Anyway, i stopped playing video games around the time the N64 came out, and just got back into them again a few months ago, playing the latest two zelda games. Thought it's time to go back and give OOT a run through, looking forward to it! That being said, don't you think it's a little presumptuous to claim a game is objectively the best? Like at a certain point it's just about preference. Like i prefer the Beatles to the Stones, and i think they are better, but if someone sees it the other way around I'm not gonna tell them they're objectively wrong. Just curious how you see it​@@lukejones7164

Because I am a sensitive soul and you're making me cry

@@SuperCameraGuBrothers LOL After listening to your video some more, you actually don't have such horrible takes for the most part. You made me realize some things about Link to the Past that nostalgia was clouding. But I gotta say, I still love these old games for what they were at the time when they came out because I was there, and I played them then. And I honestly hated when Zelda went 3D. It never really felt like Zelda anymore. Link to the Past gave us the formula, but I felt like it still had more in the way of free exploration, even if the story definitely nudged you to certain places in a certain order. Ocarina's world was so small, the tech wasn't really there to give us an expansive world. Windwaker had a nice big world, but it suffered from actually being pretty empty and having everything look the damn same cuz it's all ocean. Twilight Princess did too, but it compartmentalized its world with the stupid twilight dark world knockoff crap and its furry link stuff... And then I don't really remember there being much to find in it anyway. Then Skyward sword just didn't even give you an overworld at all. And the handholding and annoying companion that treated you like an idiot were dialed up to 11 in that game. The last two games were great. In a lot of ways to me they feel like they tried really hard to go back to their roots before the previous 3D games, and I think they did a good job in a lot of ways, but at the same time, they screwed up in a lot of other ways too. Most of my complaints aren't any different than anyone else's, so I'm not gonna list them all out. I just wanna say I didn't hate the dungeons in either game, but both didn't have enough, they weren't long enough, they didn't have enough enemies, they didn't have unique enemies(not necessarily to each dungeon, just unique to dungeons at all), and the enemies they did have weren't difficult to deal with. My one unique(I think it is, I don't see many people saying it) opinion, is that they should honestly take more inspiration from the first Zelda and the way you weren't really told where anything was, your job was to just explore and find out for yourself. The problem is every hidden thing is almost always another shrine now, and you're given map markers and guided right to the dungeons from the map markers and the quests to be found there. There's still too much handholding. All the stuff you can find seems kinda trivial, because it is, because it's all the same. It's fun in the moment, like you said, but if you try to look at the games as whole things, they're "wide as an ocean, but shallow as a puddle." I don't want a literal 1 to 1 remake of the first game. They got the exploration stuff down, they just gotta work on discovery/rewards by giving us more meaningful things to find that aren't just another damn shrine. And I actually don't hate the shrines, I just hate that they're so short and there are so many of them(and they kinda exist in their own pocket dimension or somewhere deep underground, they don't feel like a part of the rest of the world) because that kinda stuff: the caves, the koroks, and the shrines, it all makes the game feel very repetitive. I don't hate any of those ideas, but let's have some other more unique ways to provide similar rewards and experiences.

I don't really see how me being born in 2004 has anything to do with what games I enjoy. I adore several games that predate my birth, such as Ocarina of Time, Majora's Mask, Super Mario Bros. 3, Super Mario World, Super Metroid, Donkey Kong Country 2, Oracle of Ages, Oracle of Seasons, Sonic The Hedgehog 2, Sonic 3 & Knuckles, Kirby's Adventure, Kirby Super Star, the first three Wario Land games, Luigi's Mansion, Super Mario 64, Yoshi's Island, Yoshi's Story, and the list goes on. Point is, I have a perspective of quality that isn't rooted in when I was born. Sorry that I enjoy games in a way that seasoned gamers like you don't. (all of this was said with tears in my eyes, because other people's opinions greatly distresses me. Also, sorry for the excessive snark)