Whenever I see Victorian paintings, I noticed that sometimes the females in these paintings do look very masculine. I also wonder if they were guys in drag
They have family members they designate as a breeder.That way the heretical family traits will pass on to the child.That was 100% male.If they were hermaphrodites I have no idea if they had ovaries,fallopian tubes,womb,or a uterus,or birth canal along with male parts.
Hollywood is full of these beings, and the rock scene has its good share too: Steven Tyler, Axl Rose, Duff Mckagan, Lars Ulrich, James Hetfield, Yngwie, Jason Becker, Paul Gilbert. I'm just mentioning the ones I remember.
A lot of the models for the Virgin Mary during the Renaissance time were beautiful boys who also modelled as Angels , Grek and Roman Goddesss due to the fact they had long hair and females modeling at the time was considered Indecent. They were skeptical of a woman who did model 's virginity.
There were some other models in Pre-Rapaelite art that looked like men as well. Another Rossetti model Sally Cornforth. Also Annie Miller who was painted by William Holman Hunt.
How on earth could Elizabeth Siddal of all people be a man???? She’s historically stated to have gotten pregnant and had a miscarriage due to her poor health and laudanum addiction. Plus, there are photographs of her, and she definitely looks more like a woman compared to Jane Morris.
Poor Jane - a handsome man in awful clothes and a really bad wig. He looks so sad. Do they put their names in a barrel to determine who will ensure what mockery. I bet the recent ones are thanking god for the the 2pass clinic in Belgium - although they must be hating photography and the internet..not even CGI or surgery can mask the surgical sins they commit against their bodies:)) happy to be a wide ass female xx
you do release Jane Morris was born in 1839, there was no transgender, no surgery, surgery was still in its infancy, photograghy was still very new and not very good. Go look up the Pre Raphaelites and Dates portraits of her, ignorant
@@carolehirst2598 They had hormone therapy back then my dear. The men tuck as most today. I think the percentage of full castration operations is in the minority even today. They got the hormones from animal urine such as horses and cows, bulls.
@@dipsydoodle hormone replacement therapy didnt start until 1960s, 100 years later, to be gay, in Victorian England meant a prison sentence, look up Oscar Wilde for a start. Jane was a woman, she had children, both looked like her, but no IVF. Yes a androgynous looking women, but still rather her real look than the plastic, pumped up look of women today, You look at more photos from that early period, many women could pass for men, Like I said, Dipseydoodle, you have named yourself well
She was a masculine woman, like there are feminine man. She was from very poor origins, William Morris marries her and she gets educated formally. She learnt to play the piano and did great embroidery. The story of my "fair lady" was inspired in her story. She had sort of an open marriage and had several lovers. The comments about her type are out of place. It demonstrate ignorance and prejudice.
Lol, the post-modern thinker thinking she's cool and hip and is opening people's mind. This is a straight up perversion before our very eyes. Men go with women and vice versa. That's nature. Everything else, regardless how ideologically embellished it gets, is a perversion.
Women were allowed to be individual then, in beauty at least. There were far different, less homogenised ideals of loveliness then. These artists saw hidden depths.
Real photographs were shown here, and in both the paintings and photographs, it's clearly a man! It wouldn't matter what he was wearing, he'd look like a man even with makeup. He doesn't look like a man because of "fashion." It's because of his bone structure and general male anatomy.
