Тёмный

The US Navy wants to build thousands of drones to counter China. Nobody wants to build them. 

Inside China Business
Подписаться 72 тыс.
Просмотров 40 тыс.
50% 1

The US Navy is seeking contractors to build thousands of low-cost unmanned drones to counter China's dominance in these technologies. But the military-industrial complex is committed to continue the focus on large, high-cost ships and submarines.
Despite the Navy's public insistence that unmanned drones and submersibles are a priority, it has made few capital commitments, especially long-term, to attract interest from shipbuilders. What's more, legacy shipbuilders for the Navy strongly prefer to make weapons systems according to the models that exist now, given profit margins and lack of capacity.
Resources and links:
Chinese shipbuilding capacity over 200 times greater than US, Navy intelligence says
www.foxnews.co...
Active aircraft carriers, by country
www.visualcapi...
Insight: Sea drone warfare has arrived. The U.S. is floundering.
www.reuters.co...
Houthi fight extracts heavy cost from Pentagon
thehill.com/po...
3 U.S. MQ-9 Reaper drones, worth about $30 million each, have crashed in Yemen since November
www.cbsnews.co...

Опубликовано:

 

26 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 577   
@abrarabbaby
@abrarabbaby 4 месяца назад
America will probably ask China to manufacture all those drones for them 😂😂😂😂
@josephdewuhan
@josephdewuhan 4 месяца назад
Just like all the MAGA labels, hats, shirts, and flags are made in evil Chyna.
@iWantPeace838
@iWantPeace838 4 месяца назад
That's over-capacity at its best.
@adamiskandar5107
@adamiskandar5107 4 месяца назад
Aren't they worried that the drones will self-destruct at the critical moment?
@hc1897
@hc1897 4 месяца назад
Maybe not the actual assembling, but from the parts + material point of view, it already is.
@michaelfung4629
@michaelfung4629 4 месяца назад
They'll definately do that!
@brianliew5901
@brianliew5901 4 месяца назад
China can produced 30 million cars annually and drones is just a piece of cake. Never ever stir a locust nest unnecessarily.
@ramonching7772
@ramonching7772 4 месяца назад
Agree. That's what the US did to Russia with Ukraine. They are now in a quandary of how to avoid surrendering and save face. 😂😂😂
@cb250nighthawk3
@cb250nighthawk3 4 месяца назад
Using the Filipino idiots 😂😂😂
@hanmi1216
@hanmi1216 4 месяца назад
​@@ramonching7772they don't have to save face, they don't have any 😅😅😅😅
@davidwoon6402
@davidwoon6402 4 месяца назад
I believe you meant 'hornets' and not locusts.. right?! The ones with the venomous stings that buzzzzz around like crazyyyy when it spot unfriendly personnel! Well.., 🇺🇸 is definitely unfriendly..! 😅😂
@brianliew5901
@brianliew5901 4 месяца назад
@@davidwoon6402 Locusts are more numerous and more devastating, leaving nothing untouched.
@tonywatt3281
@tonywatt3281 4 месяца назад
If you ever watched the Chinese New Year drone show every year since the debut of drone shows at the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games, how the performance dazzles, you should be able to conclude their Military will certainly be more innovative and impressive.
@zomplak
@zomplak 4 месяца назад
key word of the day is "CHEAPER but not CHINA" 1 country investing for scientist and engineer while the other invest on racist and lobbyist
@kenw.4539
@kenw.4539 4 месяца назад
The Chinese are not allowed to succeed unless they are under the West's total domination like the Japanese and South Koreans. It makes the white people uncomfortable and angry as that's a challenge to their imperialism and colonialism.
@jacquelineperet6599
@jacquelineperet6599 4 месяца назад
💯✅️💯✅️
@frankm6218
@frankm6218 4 месяца назад
and MAGAs.
@andrewlim7751
@andrewlim7751 4 месяца назад
And lawyers.....tins of lawyers.
@thewackymonkey920
@thewackymonkey920 4 месяца назад
China has millions of STEM graduates yearly, and the US has millions of undecided genders yearly.
@peterlim1972
@peterlim1972 4 месяца назад
@@ChristianRescue The Chinese are returning to China even those that was born in the US as they are not treated well. It's a racist policy. Young Chinese may stay and work to learn and gain experiences but ultimately they return to China. The US economy is also not very rosy today while China is still growing.
@freetheworld2671
@freetheworld2671 4 месяца назад
😂😂😂 faaacts
@peterlim1972
@peterlim1972 4 месяца назад
@@freetheworld2671 A one liner wonder. 🤣🤣
@kenw.4539
@kenw.4539 4 месяца назад
The US has millions of lawyers who run our government at all levels, Federal, State, local.
@Feibie
@Feibie 4 месяца назад
Parasitic ​@@kenw.4539
@raymondtay9442
@raymondtay9442 4 месяца назад
Capt America will sanction the drones and all will fall into the sea!
@TAL142
@TAL142 4 месяца назад
This Sputnik moment is different. China is sole superpower in manufacturing. Nobody can out manufacture China. They have the entire supply chain. The reason China is not building hundreds of warships is because they don’t want their ship building relying solely on military spending like US did. Basically US ship building and steel industries went out of business when there were no more government military spending. China wants to build ships for economic growth and dual use. The goal is to build enough warships to defend but avoid over expanding. This way they can build newer warships constantly to replace older warships with newer and better warships.
@Zeta-y3c
@Zeta-y3c 4 месяца назад
I'd be so depressed if I was pro American.
@Ludak021
@Ludak021 4 месяца назад
I think you wouldn't give a rats as$ about any of this...for now
@HappyPandaBear73
@HappyPandaBear73 4 месяца назад
It’s actually not the American Citizens that is the issue or problem. It’s the American Government that is the problem. I refused to Vote because of that matter but the majority of the people here in America are quite pleasant but some do feel a sense of superiority because they are Anglo-Saxon Caucasian, European descendants. Ooh, yeah - they also feel that they are titled & privileged because they are White Americans, which is disturbing and those are the Racist White Americans. I just stay far away from those kinds of people.👍🙂
@antwango
@antwango 4 месяца назад
you'd be dowsing yourself and burning either yourself or your uniform in public with no one caring! says alot about the US and West!!! theres no comparison with any other country on the globe right now making these sorts of statements and the media not reporting on any of this BS!!!
@Airbender-kl7cu
@Airbender-kl7cu 4 месяца назад
🤣🤣
@andrewlim7751
@andrewlim7751 4 месяца назад
Nah, the true Americans are trying to redefine the free speech, they're doing a good job, whom would have thought they can reconstruct their First Amendment. 😁😁
@hongkongchina2048
@hongkongchina2048 4 месяца назад
How much did you spend to shoot down the weather balloons? 🎈
@dice138
@dice138 4 месяца назад
I heard from the news back then. They used the sidewinder missiles to shoot down the weather balloon. About a million each. They used about 3 or 4 of them. The balloon cost less than $1000 on Taobao.😂
@benjaminnguyen554
@benjaminnguyen554 4 месяца назад
@@dice138 lol
@danielli9167
@danielli9167 4 месяца назад
What happen is it were 5k drones in formation?
@saynotowars
@saynotowars 4 месяца назад
When the United States shot down the Chinese spy balloon intending to showcase its prowess, the opposite happened. Instead, the U.S. was ridiculed for spending millions of dollars to shoot down a balloon worth only a few thousand dollars, which could be purchased on Amazon or Alibaba.😂😂😂
@cb250nighthawk3
@cb250nighthawk3 4 месяца назад
​@@danielli9167 Biden and Trump would disappear into their business class bunkers. 🤣
@peterlim1972
@peterlim1972 4 месяца назад
China peobably has millions of drones and the Chinese drones are way better and cheaper. China's DJI is the world largest producer of commercial drones and supplies 70% of these drones to the world. Countries have been tinkering with these drones to make them into weapons. They're cheap and good and is even better than US military drones.
@gelinrefira
@gelinrefira 4 месяца назад
China is likely also going to be the first navy to field the world's first drone carrier.
@Rudyjosephjr
@Rudyjosephjr 4 месяца назад
​@@gelinrefirareminds me of Protoss swarm fleet
@leonardpearlman4017
@leonardpearlman4017 4 месяца назад
Yeah, it looks like it's a Drone INDUSTRY in China! If we produce thousands, why wouldn't they ramp up integrated giant factories and produce MILLIONS? Let's not go there. WE started this little technological revolution, were in the lead for awhile and felt very clever about it... now it's turned on us, and we're going to see if we can't make it WORSE?
@turtlesoup8134
@turtlesoup8134 4 месяца назад
@@gelinrefira The drone carrier is probably a submersible. Otherwise, the large aircraft carriers and amphibious landing ships will carry the long range large drones.
@danielb7253
@danielb7253 4 месяца назад
Chinese drones use western made chips.
@polysporin8332
@polysporin8332 4 месяца назад
US thousands of drones vs. China millions of drones. Hmmm 🤔
@seymorefact4333
@seymorefact4333 4 месяца назад
you mean BILLIONS OF DRONES!
@brianliew5901
@brianliew5901 4 месяца назад
More than half of the thousands US drones were made in China.😂😂😂😂😂
@antwango
@antwango 4 месяца назад
its more like tens of drones versus millions!!
@piccalillipit9211
@piccalillipit9211 3 месяца назад
THIS IS WHAT I have been telling people - does not matter how good your ship is - it cant shoot down 10,000 drones this is the Maxim Gun moment of the 21st century - when the British were sending cavalry against machine guns
@brianliew5901
@brianliew5901 3 месяца назад
@@piccalillipit9211 Yes, it can by using $100 billions worth of missiles to shoot down $100 millions worth of drones.🤑🤑🤑🤑🤑
@michaelmarchal4004
@michaelmarchal4004 4 месяца назад
Haha, If the USA can do it imagine how much China can build. 😅😅😅
@Cheesecake99YearsAgo
@Cheesecake99YearsAgo 4 месяца назад
Arouns 200x in volume 😂
@topsuperseven7910
@topsuperseven7910 4 месяца назад
Much less without high end chips and 10x less wealth than the USA.
@topsuperseven7910
@topsuperseven7910 4 месяца назад
@@couthelloworld maybe but youre going to want them on them on the long distance remote controllers and all the systems to run them as well as these facilities that will mass produce them... until US high end chip missiles obliterate them.
@oberstleutnant787
@oberstleutnant787 4 месяца назад
That's why USa accuse China of "over capacity"
@topsuperseven7910
@topsuperseven7910 4 месяца назад
@@oberstleutnant787 the USA just observed China trying to dump EVs.
@tompell3032
@tompell3032 4 месяца назад
The US military the biggest spender by far. Why? They are paying $90,000 for small steel bushings in a small ziploc bag (20 to 30 bushings in all),. Now you can undertand why.
@kenw.4539
@kenw.4539 4 месяца назад
That's just the tip of the iceberg. ALL the defense contractors have been doing that all the time for decades, stealing billions of dollars of precious US tax dollars not going to infrastructure or education or health care or housing and the politicians know about it and let them get away with it. Under Trump, the number of Pentagon inspector generals went way down even though everyone knew this is going on. It's literally like some kind of mafia, organized crime racket. That's not an understatement sadly.
@keyser021
@keyser021 4 месяца назад
Rep. Gaetz got Def. Sec. Austin to admit on camera that only 29% of ALL F35s produced are flyable, the other 71% are R&D mishaps. At $100 million per plane, think of the TRILLIONS and TRILLIONS and TRILLIONS of $ that is grifted and stolen from US tax payers, to get in return an F35 that is obsolete via drone swarms. Geniuses running the grift.
@beegonee
@beegonee 4 месяца назад
And still imported from china..😅
@tompell3032
@tompell3032 4 месяца назад
@@beegonee pay the chinese $10, then resell to uncle SAM for $90,000.
@bemmychan1518
@bemmychan1518 4 месяца назад
And don't forget the cost of toilets and screws and nuts! They are super high quality and super expensive. 😂😂😂😂
@mijmijrm
@mijmijrm 4 месяца назад
i think it's probably a good thing that the most belligerent are the worst at making weapons.
@shaundudley4576
@shaundudley4576 4 месяца назад
Lovely Thought
@josephdewuhan
@josephdewuhan 4 месяца назад
Never thought of that. But a good point to convince the public so that they demand their rulers behave less belligerent.
@timothyrockwell2638
@timothyrockwell2638 4 месяца назад
Of course, they are literally poorly educated barbarians whose entire economic system and foreign policy is based on exploitation, and in the words of Trump's former director of CIA and Secretary of the State Dept, "We lied, we cheated, we stole, we had entire training courses. It reminds you of the glory of the American experiment."
@wimbletone1
@wimbletone1 4 месяца назад
Dumb vs Dumb UsA is so Not awinner anymore
@sword7872
@sword7872 4 месяца назад
Its a good thing that the expensive weapons are not the winners in a war. This is the best kind of human progress where the $200 weapon can destroy a $2m weapon.
@adamiskandar5107
@adamiskandar5107 4 месяца назад
Before this, the hegemon was the sole heavyweight champion with no challengers. Someone pls tell the hegemon that the law of the jungle no longer applies and it need to abide by the rules of civilization.
@bemmychan1518
@bemmychan1518 4 месяца назад
That's actually good for MIC business. If the US weapons are cheap, they would need trillion units to make it worthwhile for the MIC. 😂😂😂😂
@Truthstelling
@Truthstelling 4 месяца назад
US keeps talking about going to wars. Why don't they try world peace talk for a change. Ooops, the MIC will be unemployed n their pockets will be empty😂😂
@luisanthonychau
@luisanthonychau 4 месяца назад
It is more than MIC. It is the survival of USD; hence, the survival of US regime.
@litesp
@litesp 4 месяца назад
@@luisanthonychau The USD is threatened by US policy. Sanctions, weaponizing the USD, theft of national assets are backfiring.
@bertanelson8062
@bertanelson8062 4 месяца назад
Exactly.
@iWantPeace838
@iWantPeace838 4 месяца назад
"Cheap" might be a dirty word in the MIC circle. They probably don't care much about casualties in action, or the actual effectiveness of the equipment they built. All they want is money. It's a shameful culture. The US will continue to spend more on defense (in fact, it's offense) budgets, while getting less from the money.
@kenw.4539
@kenw.4539 4 месяца назад
The Russians just destroyed 5 $10 million dollar M1 Abrams tanks in Ukraine in the past few days without much effort because they are supposedly exploiting a flaw in these tanks.
@tangbesitangbesi7009
@tangbesitangbesi7009 4 месяца назад
Well said
@litesp
@litesp 4 месяца назад
The US has the most expensive military in the world, not the most effective.
@jsb8888
@jsb8888 4 месяца назад
ask Ukrainian why they prefer Chinese drone than fancy expensive US one. It is reliability. Boeing and US automakers are examples of poor quality US manufactures.
@TrollogyExpert
@TrollogyExpert 4 месяца назад
The US navy is not shooting down drones with $2mil missile, that would be very dangerous because there is no such thing as 100% interception rate, they need to fire 2 $2mil missiles per drone.
@hanmi1216
@hanmi1216 4 месяца назад
Well, when they shoot down a balloon they indeed need 2 missiles, because the first 1 is missed. A drone is faster than a balloon, I guess they're missed a lot.
@trekpac2
@trekpac2 4 месяца назад
The US has been shooting down some cheap drones with expensive missiles.
@tangbesitangbesi7009
@tangbesitangbesi7009 4 месяца назад
Couldn't agree more with you
@Dordord
@Dordord 4 месяца назад
32 ASAE radars on the Fujian carrier are waiting for those drones😂😂😂
@mileszhang5773
@mileszhang5773 4 месяца назад
not fujian carrier, there will be a new type of drone carrier
@rontsang4308
@rontsang4308 4 месяца назад
Hollywood needs these ships for movie props. How are they going to make Tom looks cool without those aircraft carriers?
@CraigTheBrute-yf7no
@CraigTheBrute-yf7no 4 месяца назад
Yemen is building underground drone bases with cheap chinese AI chips
@李丹-j8o
@李丹-j8o 4 месяца назад
The large-scale industrialization of drones. The cost of starting a war is very low, and one million US dollars is enough to start a war, which is thanks to China's industrial revolution
@PahatRout
@PahatRout 4 месяца назад
Talking about Yemen, isn't this nation among the poorest of the Arab nations? And yet, they could prevent the might of NATO from using the Suez Canal. Why is the might of the US unable to stop this threat? Obviously, there is a lot of explanation. The US military leadership thought high priced products are superior? If such quality is the yardstick, it is obvious the real value of US industrial complexes are definitely over-priced by too many folds!
@leoncioco3305
@leoncioco3305 4 месяца назад
The folly we embark, when we could just as easily cooperate and prosper together..
@antwango
@antwango 4 месяца назад
yeeeah the entire world knows this its just the usual colonials who want to remain colonials!
@tomiputra3720
@tomiputra3720 4 месяца назад
1 US drone equal the prices 1000 -10.000 Chinese drones 😅
@mileszhang5773
@mileszhang5773 4 месяца назад
and the chinese drones are better
@peterlim1972
@peterlim1972 4 месяца назад
Three of the most expensive US drones whose name I can't remember was taken down by the Houthis.Each drone cost $30 million. It makes me wonder how the US, the UK etc can win in a war with China when they can't even defeat the Houthis?
@siewkonsum7291
@siewkonsum7291 4 месяца назад
The Chinese can do the same. Their standby stock of all kinds of drones that can convert to military purposes is 200 millions units at any time. 😊
@misty671
@misty671 4 месяца назад
We need to stop war mongering and focus on improving the lives of our citizens.
@paulw4487
@paulw4487 4 месяца назад
US govt has given up on improving lives of Americans. On fact it will need to take things away like medicare....just to minimize the deficit.
@bemmychan1518
@bemmychan1518 4 месяца назад
Well, the US government believes in killing off all the external competitors first before focusing on internal. Whereas the Chinese believes in strengthening internal first, before embarking on external. 😂😂😂😂
@SteveBurg2001
@SteveBurg2001 4 месяца назад
Giant aircraft carriers don't seem viable in a modern war. They're mostly a jobs program in the US, and probably a nice juicy target for hypersonic drones.
@hanmi1216
@hanmi1216 4 месяца назад
The Jobs program is the number 2. Number 1 is the pocket of the lobbyist, MIC and politicians. The Jobs program is only a collateral that will be used during elections.
@litesp
@litesp 4 месяца назад
Floating cemetery.
@ZweiZwolf
@ZweiZwolf 4 месяца назад
They're still very good for bullying small, weak countries. America loves to bully small, weak countries, so they still need carriers. For now.
@georgepoitras3502
@georgepoitras3502 4 месяца назад
The Hypersonic missiles that don't work and get shot down all of the time over Ukraine? Those hypersonic missiles? NO ONE CARES.
@123_bob
@123_bob 3 месяца назад
An Australian government official needs to watch this report. What are they thinking investing Billions on US nuclear subs, when drone swarms are the primary front line weapons? Unmanned weapons. Realistically, every weapon is an evil thing. Waisting billions of dollars on redundant tech is a sad joke. Thank you Kevin for raising these vital questions. We need to make friends, not make war
@JayTse-x7l
@JayTse-x7l 4 месяца назад
US’s 11 carriers is a number only. Most of these carriers are old and needs lots of services.
@danielb7253
@danielb7253 4 месяца назад
Plz inform with facts. Not just generalizations. U ever serve?
@michaelloong964
@michaelloong964 4 месяца назад
Half of them are in the repair docks waiting for $90000 bushings.
@UlyaGaniya
@UlyaGaniya 4 месяца назад
They're likely floating coffins by today standard
@hanmi1216
@hanmi1216 4 месяца назад
​@@danielb7253you'll generalise if all the US products are like that. Just looked at Boeing. Or Chevrolet cars.... My dad's Chevrolet takes longer in the repair shop than in my house garage. Use 1 month then 3 months in the repair shop, and keep repeating....
@willengel-vs8ht
@willengel-vs8ht 4 месяца назад
the most they can get underway is 3-4 at one time. the rule of thumb is 3-3-3. three underway, three in routine maintenance, 3 major overhaul.
@alanbgtan
@alanbgtan 4 месяца назад
Yes US & China are competing & US is spending more. But it cost $billions in USA just to build one whereas it cost few thousands of $ for China to do same. It’s not the same
@123_bob
@123_bob 3 месяца назад
An Australian government official needs to watch this report. What are they thinking investing Billions on US nuclear subs, when drone swarms are the primary front line weapons? Unmanned weapons. Realistically, every weapon is an evil thing. Waisting billions of dollars on redundant tech is a sad joke. Thank you Kevin for raising these vital questions.
@trekpac2
@trekpac2 4 месяца назад
Kevin, your analyses are extremely well done, factual, connected to top news sources. Who ARE you!? I’d like to know more about you, broadcasting prolifically from a different city in China every day.
@teac117
@teac117 4 месяца назад
I always laughed in the game Civ when my aircraft carriers lost to enemy phalanx units. Who would have thought it was an accurate sim.
@mrblurblur2003
@mrblurblur2003 4 месяца назад
The only way for US Navy to be cost effective is to sit down and talk to the Chinese and forge a long term contract on building low cost drones. Now it is advised that the US Navy be humble and polite to the Chinese and they won't take kindly to rude officers such as Blinken did. Btw bring along your finest champagne 😂
@wnklee6878
@wnklee6878 4 месяца назад
Ruling the world is not what it used to be.
@UpsideDown-e2d
@UpsideDown-e2d 4 месяца назад
An out of the box suggestion: Out-source the lot to China - China could build for the US navy cheaper, faster and better. What is there not to like?😁
@iWantPeace838
@iWantPeace838 4 месяца назад
There is a problem. Chinese manufacturers can't get hold of (American made) chips and batteries to put into American drones. The user manuals will be in Chinese language.
@UpsideDown-e2d
@UpsideDown-e2d 4 месяца назад
@@iWantPeace838 No problem. Just use Chinese chips and batteries which are far better. They can be debugged to eliminate back-channels and spywares. The user manuals? Even less of a problem. No user manuals now. An AI algo could be used to communicate/speak and exhibit in any language. Even explain in simple English for the slow-minded.😁
@adamiskandar5107
@adamiskandar5107 4 месяца назад
@@UpsideDown-e2d Too late. They may have banned DJI first, but now the Chinese government are controlling the export of 'strategic materials/products' to unfriendly foreigners. Even if the US government were to beg them to 'recouple', they would likely think twice. Trust once lost would take a long time to rebuild.
@IwanSetiawan-cc4ft
@IwanSetiawan-cc4ft 4 месяца назад
@@UpsideDown-e2d exactly
@pgdog888
@pgdog888 4 месяца назад
America just talks alot now days. But nothing to show for. A legit paper tiger.
@thinkingtoomuch7974
@thinkingtoomuch7974 3 месяца назад
Israeli-owned paper tiger
@yingxu7908
@yingxu7908 4 месяца назад
Thank you Kevin have fun🎉🎉🎉加油👏
@JAREDPLY1
@JAREDPLY1 4 месяца назад
China, Russia, Iran and NK are a defacto military alliance, 3 of the 4 have nuclear weapons and all have great military industrial capacity. The reason being is their government control, at an instant they can produce military equipment and ammunition that is cheaper and competent on the battlefield if war escalates. The US military can no longer rely on accuracy and better performing equipment if they are being destroyed by the sheer volume of drones and artillery, ships and missiles. The US MIC cannot compete, they just don't have enough capacity.
@adamiskandar5107
@adamiskandar5107 4 месяца назад
How I wish they realized that and rationally stop all their warmongering. Almost all military conflicts around the world would stop if the hegemon "convert their swords into plowshares".
@hanmi1216
@hanmi1216 4 месяца назад
"Rely on accuracy and better performing? " That's an oxymoron with the US military.... Accuracy? They can't even shoot down a balloon in the first shot using the so-called the best missile in the world.... Better performing? Just look at F35, never go to war but fall a lot....
@ZweiZwolf
@ZweiZwolf 4 месяца назад
Iran may have nuclear weapons, and should be treated as such. Having strong industrial base means that they don't need government control - they can pivot quickly simply by virtue of knowing how to build things efficiently.
@bemmychan1518
@bemmychan1518 4 месяца назад
Meanwhile the US are destroying it's economy and dollars hegemony...
@Larkinchance
@Larkinchance 4 месяца назад
Amid a public relations fan-fair, China introduced a new aircraft carrier. I suspect that it was just for show to set the US off on a ship building spree. This is old established technology and the carrier and the fighter jets that it carries are obsolete. I suspect that China is investing their energies in AI piloted drones that be launched in a synchronized swarm in addition to public relations traps for the US to step into. The most expensive and irreplaceable element in a jet fighter is the human pilot. In the end, when the US is gone, Taiwan will rejoin China because China will make it an attractive proposition. A sea-land invasion is "so old world"
@kl9518
@kl9518 4 месяца назад
Just like the Terracotta Army.
@softde
@softde 4 месяца назад
thank you Kevin for speaking the truth
@CattleFarmer667
@CattleFarmer667 4 месяца назад
Why not? A bag bushing cost USD90k for US army. I'm sure someone can make lots of money making drone for US.
@ThanhLê-j2z
@ThanhLê-j2z 4 месяца назад
When you have a thousand they are will has a ten thousands, don't forget they're world factory
@TanuKart
@TanuKart 4 месяца назад
imagine shooting a weather balloon for millions of dollars
@user-ej6sk1tu2u
@user-ej6sk1tu2u 4 месяца назад
Thank you for your clear and slow English. Of course also for the content of your videos that explain many facts regarding the new rolle of China in the world, usually forgotten or misrepresented by the main stream media.
@DingoHammer
@DingoHammer 4 месяца назад
I think a US admiral once said that there are two types of ships, submarines and targets.
@cb250nighthawk3
@cb250nighthawk3 4 месяца назад
I think he said "submarines and sitting ducks" 😂😂😂
@UlyaGaniya
@UlyaGaniya 4 месяца назад
Wait until chinese underwater drones revealed, all will be target
@DailyBeatings
@DailyBeatings 4 месяца назад
Modern warfare will be fought with drones, missiles, and AI. China has absolute advantage in two of these...
@Ace1000ks19751982
@Ace1000ks19751982 4 месяца назад
China has a giant industrial capacity, I am sure they can build millions of drones while the US can build thousands of drones. LOL
@Realist-sh3dg
@Realist-sh3dg 4 месяца назад
According to Winston Churchill Generals and Admirals plan for the last war. The US is still planning and building for another WWII.
@silversurfer8237
@silversurfer8237 4 месяца назад
The G.I. Joe movies showed lots of drone warfare in 2009 and 2013. One would have thought the US military would be extensively using drones in their operations. It sounds like the PLA are bigger fans of the G.I. Joe movies.
@benjaminnguyen554
@benjaminnguyen554 4 месяца назад
lol the rules of engagement are hilarious 😎
@MrStevemur
@MrStevemur 4 месяца назад
News articles often cite the number of aircraft carriers as though that measures the whole strength of a country's military. There'll be a whole article about the US and China tussling over Taiwan, and the military comparison will be just one statistic: the US has 11 aircraft carriers and China has 3.
@ZweiZwolf
@ZweiZwolf 4 месяца назад
The West still thinks it's WW2, when carriers ruled the seas. Admitting that carriers are useless against China would make them look bad.
@davidlim5
@davidlim5 4 месяца назад
Kevin. US Navy no one building for them? Why? US can't pay!!!
@yaoypl
@yaoypl 4 месяца назад
The US Air Force pays $90,000 for a package of bushings that normally costs well under $100 🤣🤣🤣
@panyaboonc5621
@panyaboonc5621 4 месяца назад
US should ask China to build for them.
@MicheleLLOYD-bk2mt
@MicheleLLOYD-bk2mt 3 месяца назад
really appreciate your work mate fantastic many thanks
@conybrown991
@conybrown991 4 месяца назад
Never thought about building thousands drone is a topic.
@CK-jo9im
@CK-jo9im 4 месяца назад
I am an African, I think what the US only best is weapons, weapons and weapons. Nothing good for humanity, not so?
@lambertgiang
@lambertgiang 4 месяца назад
The US can ask its Favorite Allies India to hep producing it by giving them the Blue Print and the Indian will be far too happy to do that so they can make a copy and wouldn't worry about copy rights if the US wants to sue. That's a WIN-WIN situation, one gets the products at cheaper prices and the other can save time on research. Go ahead!
@xushenxin
@xushenxin 4 месяца назад
If it is lower cost, then it means defense contractors will get less money. This is not allowed to happen.
@szolanek
@szolanek 3 месяца назад
20 years ago i bought a 40 MB Winchester for my PC. I didn't see that coming.
@ayadealjanabi1544
@ayadealjanabi1544 4 месяца назад
As always, another fantastic video. Fast becoming my goto channel for updates from the east 👍
@BarbarosGunes
@BarbarosGunes 4 месяца назад
Yes, boeing, general dynamics or lockheed martin manufacture the drones, each for a few million dollars 😁
@AIPretendingToBeHuman
@AIPretendingToBeHuman 4 месяца назад
So US military spending is 10x of Russia's. Given the US's military track record against the Houthis, the Afghans, the Vietnamese, the North Koreans, it would be tough to argue we're getting our money's worth. What I'm really wondering is what the Chinese are getting for their military spending. They don't seem to be a wasteful people.
@alanfing639
@alanfing639 4 месяца назад
yep, im starting to see that,with good people like you, i guess we have to hit bottom , for a long time.that might be a good thing
@ButchCassidyAndSundanceKid
@ButchCassidyAndSundanceKid 4 месяца назад
I remember when the U.S. shot down the Chinese "spy" balloon, it used an AIM-9X Sidewinder fired by the F-22 Raptor, the balloon probably cost the Chinese peanuts to make. The Chinese must be laughing.
@davidrichards1741
@davidrichards1741 4 месяца назад
Haha, China could build them, for a tenth of the cost of the US with infinitely better quality
@donhuang9855
@donhuang9855 4 месяца назад
That is a big mistake to make as you don’t compete on something where China has a distinct comparative advantage over the USA in this area, given that China can out manufacture weaponized drones in larger qualities, more cheaply, more advance technically, integrated with satellite-enabled real-time services, and embedded with anti-disruptive software.
@user-mk4fh2fq7p
@user-mk4fh2fq7p 4 месяца назад
The military race could be a lot closer and narrowing. China is way more productive and being more militarily innovative.
@under18fearless
@under18fearless 4 месяца назад
China’s military industrial complex is less corrupted than the US military industrial complex. China gets 90 cents to a dollar but US only get 10 cents to a dollar spent. Thus US military equipments is 9 times more expansive than a Chinese equivalent.
@raygan777able
@raygan777able 4 месяца назад
3M for a drone? Gosh. China can build 30 of the same with that.
@bemmychan1518
@bemmychan1518 4 месяца назад
300 more like... 😂😂😂😂
@DouglasW-m9z
@DouglasW-m9z 4 месяца назад
Americans are always ahead, in talking, yaba yabi yab yab going nowhere
@alko_xo
@alko_xo 4 месяца назад
Wait, are you saying that the F-35 is not a Wunderwaffe?!
@ulooqulg
@ulooqulg 4 месяца назад
They already built a dedicated UAV CARRIER , multiple UAV copter motherships... LoL.
@dsc0273
@dsc0273 4 месяца назад
Thanks Kevin
@wnklee6878
@wnklee6878 4 месяца назад
The US wants to build back better.
@TheRealMcCoyAndChipsAhoy
@TheRealMcCoyAndChipsAhoy 4 месяца назад
WAR WAR WAR....it's all they care about.. It's madness !
@davidhuynh5010
@davidhuynh5010 4 месяца назад
A wise man. THEY need to listen to you.
@ltribley
@ltribley 4 месяца назад
China and Russia lead world militaries in advanced “next generation” weapon systems such as drones (air/UAV), hypersonic missiles, air defense, electronic warfare, satellite, quantum telecommunications, and much more. It’s going to be nearly statistically impossible for the U.S. and NATO countries to catch up at least for the rest of the century. Nearly all of the new military procurements are formulated on 40 year old Cold War thinking and rewarding each other. Weapon systems are outdated the moment they are deployed. Over-engineered, fragile, and under-performing, expensive. The U.S. is required to field 11 aircraft carriers by Statute as part of our outdated model of military power projection. The law would have to changed to move away from the many large and expensive carrier task forces the politicians and MIC hold so dear. But the U.S. only has sufficient resources to deploy 5 of the 11 carriers at any one time, and even here they are understaffed, under-resourced. One is stationed in Japan by treaty leaving the other 4 to cover the world’s oceans. Each one of these can be sunk with no more than 2 unstoppable Chinese, Russian, Iranian, and now North Korean hypersonic missiles. In a Congressional hearing several weeks ago, U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin stated that just under 30% of the F-35's ARE combat ready. In several previous GAO reports they stated that upwards of 40% were not combat ready so we see a significant deterioration over the last several years. Read the GAO audits and investigations over the years and they explicitly state that ALL of our services are not combat ready, and will not be so for years to come. They are no longer capable of recruiting the necessary personnel/expertise anyway. The $ billions spent on the Navy's LCS program was a failure. Nearly all other weapons systems underperform and when you look at their core tech much is based in the 1980's. The Patriots are incapable of shooting down advanced supersonic and hypersonic missiles for example. Over the last several years the U.S. has shut down multiple hypersonic missile development programs. Only programs like those in China and Russia who focus on integrated, inter-operable strategic military goals have been successful to date. Both China and Russia have “Military Escalatory Dominance” in their respective regions. Taken together as allies, they are the most powerful militaries in recorded military history. ----- BTW. Air defense systems typically fire 2 missiles to target every incoming missile or drone. In Ukraine and in the Red Sea they fire 2 missiles for every incoming. So a single $2,000 Houthis drone is met with 2, $2 million U.S. missiles, and UKR fires 2 Patriot missiles for every 1 Russian drone or missile. $4 million per defense! In the recent Iran “limited” drone and missile response to the Israeli attack on their Consulate, it is estimated that Israel expended approximately $1 billion in missile defense! The Houthis were the first to use a new Naval Attrition Warfare model de-arming U.S. and NATO Navies and forcing them to retire to base to rearm. When that happens the Carrier also needs to leave since it can no longer be defended. The Houthis effectively defeated the U.S. and NATO Navies in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden!
@piay9647
@piay9647 4 месяца назад
they're tasting their own meds... greedsowgreed
@tompell3032
@tompell3032 4 месяца назад
the Navy can always ask DJI to build them.
@jimmielin1141
@jimmielin1141 4 месяца назад
CH 4, the Chinese equivalent to American reaper drone only Costs 3 million dollars so there’s that.
@kenw.4539
@kenw.4539 4 месяца назад
Yep, vertically integrated manufacturing like BYD.
@hocyrusgreat9324
@hocyrusgreat9324 4 месяца назад
First millennium is about individualism. Second millennium is about cooperation.
@jeanschaeffer4225
@jeanschaeffer4225 4 месяца назад
...... AIRCRAFT CARRIERS ARE BIG..BIG ..BIG SITTING DUCKS... THESE DAYS.... GREETINGS FROM ASIA
@Kenny-vd5cw
@Kenny-vd5cw 4 месяца назад
productivity was is and always will be the key.
@ronaldlee4067
@ronaldlee4067 4 месяца назад
Too bad, US always under estimate the enemies or friends. Devastating for US to initiate war. See how Americans died. Now US using proxy war but US also facing suicidal consequences
@李丹-j8o
@李丹-j8o 4 месяца назад
The large-scale industrialization of drones. The cost of starting a war is very low, and one million US dollars is enough to start a war, which is thanks to China's industrial revolution
@danielb7253
@danielb7253 4 месяца назад
Worse case scenario. Tactical nukes would be used. Don’t forget that
@cb250nighthawk3
@cb250nighthawk3 4 месяца назад
Which is why the Yankees should go home and stay home, stay safe. For everyone's sake. Shut down all the 800+ military bases. Upgrade the infrastructures etc etc. 🎉
@adamiskandar5107
@adamiskandar5107 4 месяца назад
I thought that only Russia would threaten nuclear war. Looks like the bully wants to destroy the world including himself, just to 'win'.
@RePete02
@RePete02 4 месяца назад
It's difficult to imagine the number of small, fast and lethal under sea drones China is capable of utilizing very quickly in the Taiwan Strait or anywhere else in their own back yard. Remember, one does not have to sink an enemy combatant's ship or submarine, only put it out of action. An aircraft carrier is useless unless it can launch and recover aircraft. It's very hard to fight when you're busy pumping and patching a badly listing ship. Drones of all types by the thousands and missiles of all sorts are the mainstay of today's warfare.
@jameskpaywilliams4865
@jameskpaywilliams4865 4 месяца назад
Chinese experts are are everywhere.
@piay9647
@piay9647 4 месяца назад
these era is retrofitting techs from early innovations adaptation
@hc1897
@hc1897 4 месяца назад
Classic tale of the elephant thinking itself so big, so noble ... that it ends up being eaten alive by 10 million tiny, hardworking, smart and superbly organised FIRE ANTS. Just as you thought it couldn't get any better (from an anti-hegemonic point of view), it does.
@firstlast-pt5pp
@firstlast-pt5pp 4 месяца назад
@5:22 - cheap and fast - that's the problem
@kpakaify
@kpakaify 4 месяца назад
China is already building them.
@kennethkueh1256
@kennethkueh1256 4 месяца назад
Its cheaper and faster to buy them from China. Better too. China can make to buyer's spec. USA military budget are corrupted.
@JohnJaneson
@JohnJaneson 4 месяца назад
You think there is no corruption in PRC military budget?
@duileyah
@duileyah 4 месяца назад
Maybe the US should ask China if they want to manufacture these drones for them.....I mean, they'ver asked for dumber shit.
@kandi303
@kandi303 3 месяца назад
DJI and Unitree
@MyMikey88
@MyMikey88 4 месяца назад
EXACTLLY RIGHT! The country to produce more logistic is the winner in any battle-200 times faster then USA? I was thinking they are 100times faster...
@martinwilby8942
@martinwilby8942 4 месяца назад
be good
@flagpole974
@flagpole974 4 месяца назад
There are 3 fitms just in central texas building small uas systems- i personally have built some of these systems as a precision welder
@thetruthandnobs
@thetruthandnobs 4 месяца назад
what r they building if not aircraft carriers? The answer is rather obvious, isn't it? Answer: something ALOT BETTER than carriers. The emergence of hypersonic missiles..... You get it. China's building something you will find out AT THE TIME OF BATTLE. Hint: It's not a carrier. 🎯
Далее
BlackRock: The Conspiracies You Don’t Know
15:13
Просмотров 1,8 млн
Which is Better? Flying the F-16 or the F/A-18?
30:19
Просмотров 705 тыс.
See Why Navy Jets Don't Need Windshield Wipers
8:13
Просмотров 1,8 млн
Why Pilots NEVER Hold The Stick On The Catapult
4:38
Просмотров 799 тыс.
The Deadliest Weapon On US Navy Ships Right Now
14:04