Тёмный

The V-2 Rocket (A 4) - How Effective was it? 

Military History Visualized
Подписаться 773 тыс.
Просмотров 499 тыс.
50% 1

The V-2 official designation A 4 is often called a "Wunderwaffe" although it was a major breakthrough in rocket technology, its suitability for a weapon in World War 2 is limited. This video takes a look at its development, technical specifications, history and especially on its effectiveness nothing several factors.
Military History Visualized provides a series of short narrative and visual presentations like documentaries based on academic literature or sometimes primary sources. Videos are intended as introduction to military history, but also contain a lot of details for history buffs. Since the aim is to keep the episodes short and comprehensive some details are often cut.
» HOW YOU CAN SUPPORT MILITARY HISTORY VISUALIZED «
(A) You can support my channel on Patreon: / mhv
(B) You can also buy "Spoils of War" (merchandise) in the online shop: www.redbubble....
» SOCIAL MEDIA LINKS «
facebook: / milhistoryvisualized
twitter: / milhivisualized
tumblr: / militaryhistoryvisualized
» SOURCES «
Hahn, Fritz: Waffen und Geheimwaffen des deutschen Heeres 1933-1945
Germany and the Second World War - Volume 5 / 2:
Germany and the Second World War - Volume 7
Das Deutsche Reich und der Zweite Weltkrieg - Band 5 / 2
Das Deutsche Reich und der Zweite Weltkrieg - Band 7
Zaloga, Steven J.: V-2 Ballistic Missile 1942-52
Zaloga, Steven J.: V-1 Flying Bomb 1942-52 - Hitler’s infamous “doodlebug”
en.wikipedia.o...
en.wikipedia.o...
en.wikipedia.o...
en.wikipedia.o...
» TOOL CHAIN «
PowerPoint 2016, Word, Excel, Tile Mill, QGIS, Processing 3, Adobe Illustrator, Adobe Premiere, Adobe Audition, Adobe Photoshop, Adobe After Effects, Adobe Animate.

Опубликовано:

 

14 окт 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 984   
@rittervontrost5680
@rittervontrost5680 7 лет назад
Soviet-Womble, SpaceNazis and the randomization of umlauts to make everything supergermanic. What a lovely and eclectic kind of humour ... I like it.
@neilwilson5785
@neilwilson5785 7 лет назад
I do, too.
@andrewklang809
@andrewklang809 7 лет назад
Ritter von Trost Who knew a German could have a sense of humor?
@XMeK
@XMeK 7 лет назад
He might have been adopted...
@Ostsol
@Ostsol 7 лет назад
He's Austrian, actually...
@MilitaryAviationHistory
@MilitaryAviationHistory 7 лет назад
We do but this one is Austrian so it's another sad matter entirely
@SovietWomble
@SovietWomble 7 лет назад
11:00 - HEY!! I do loads of damage, thank you very much. Mostly to my own side...but still.
@ladymaeve
@ladymaeve 7 лет назад
This whole thing was just glorious! xD
@pablowako
@pablowako 7 лет назад
SovietWomble Mostly to Cyanide
@MilitaryHistoryVisualized
@MilitaryHistoryVisualized 7 лет назад
hey, nice for dropping by and confirming the reports of my signal intelligence unit, seems Franz who tipped me off earned a promotion and Hans, who said nope, well, he will have some fun in the penal company. Thx for the update, I will tag it under friendly fire. ;) Cheers love your vids!
@darthhateful
@darthhateful 7 лет назад
Yes mostly to your own side and your Dignity.
@SovietWomble
@SovietWomble 7 лет назад
+Military History Visualized Likewise, same to you! I was actually one of your subscribers prior to this point. Your coverage of Operation Barbarossa I found particularly enjoyable. I am also now one of your Patrons. All the best with your video editing.
@riculfriculfson7243
@riculfriculfson7243 3 года назад
My father was a child in London during the entire run of the war. He always referred to the V-2 as a failure because it was difficult to get scared about a weapon you didn't know was coming. When it did come, you didn't see or hear it and it tended to bury itself so deep it deadened the amount of surface damage it was capable of. The V-1, on the other hand, you COULD hear coming. He said, "the only thing that was scarier than hearing a Doodlebug (UK slang for the V-1) was suddenly not being able to hear a Doodlebug". He also recounted a story where he was standing at his front door with his father (RAF ground crew on leave) when a V-1 glided past the end of the road (Larkshall Crescent, Chingford) BELOW the level of the houses. They saw it for a split second. My Grandfather picked up my Father (he was about 6 at the time) and threw him the length of the hall and then threw himself on top. Grandad must have known that if the 1 ton of explosive went off there was no chance of survival but you do what you can in war 😀. The buzzbomb made it far enough to reach Chingford Hatch before levelling it. It's 'funny' to think that there was a time when all of this was just 'Tuesday'. 😐
@119beaker
@119beaker 2 года назад
I hate Tuesdays.
@potatosalad68
@potatosalad68 2 года назад
Imagine Mondays.
@WeWillAlwaysHaveVALIS
@WeWillAlwaysHaveVALIS 2 года назад
My great grandmother, who raised her five kids (including my grandmother on my mother's side, who was the youngest child) in London during the entirety of the blitz, told a similar story to this. How everyone in the area would stop briefly upon hearing the engine noise of the doodlebug and would only seek shelter if they heard the engine noise stop. She didn't have an opinion on the V2 per say, she knew about them but as you say they had less of a terror element attached to them as there wasn't any ways of knowing that they were on their way. I miss both the women mentioned in this story, both have been gone for around twenty years and my great grandmother was very close to our family during my childhood, and would stay with us on multiple occasions during the year but with Xmas as a certainty. My immediate family (ie my siblings) have effectively disowned me and I miss those years of unbridled familial love as all I have now is loneliness, isolation and hatred towards me. Anyone who reads this and still has access to the older generations of their respective families, please take my word and treasure them as they do not last long.
@victorboucher675
@victorboucher675 2 года назад
add a whistle to it
@phangs2022
@phangs2022 2 года назад
If you able to hear it, you're lucky you're not the target
@gunnerr8476
@gunnerr8476 7 лет назад
But can V2 rocket land on the moon? "No, it will always hit London" - Von Braun.
@VRichardsn
@VRichardsn 7 лет назад
von Braun had a book (which later was made into a film) that went by the title "I aim for the stars". Some people liked to add a second part to that statement: "... but sometimes, I happen to hit London"
@Wombat1916
@Wombat1916 7 лет назад
+Afnan Zahran Back in the 70's I went camping in the countryside to the south of London. In the corner of one field there was a jinormous crater and we were told that it was caused by a V2 dropping short. In a wood just a mile or two from the North Downs was the remains of a V1 - just a bit of the tail pipe actiually.
@comet1970
@comet1970 7 лет назад
From Tom Lehrer's song in the 1960s: "Once the rockets are up, who cares where they come down? That's not my department," says Wernher von Braun.
@outpostflags
@outpostflags 7 лет назад
why is it that we must live in the tower of babble with all these people who simply cannot clearly speak
@roberth.goddardthefatherof6376
no, it took him far longer to do that without me.
@balsakovacevic8423
@balsakovacevic8423 7 лет назад
'did little damage' *shows a picture of Soviet Womble* i lold
@TheSchultinator
@TheSchultinator 7 лет назад
Balsa Kovacevic Yeah, I would ask 'why the hate', but it's Womble we're talking about xD
@edi9892
@edi9892 7 лет назад
WTF is a Womble?
@edi9892
@edi9892 7 лет назад
Zigzag010 That still doesn't tell me much....
@tramachi7027
@tramachi7027 7 лет назад
or the friendly fire artillery^^
@randommcranderson5155
@randommcranderson5155 7 лет назад
he's a youtuber who plays video games, sometimes badly, but his videos are pretty funny if you're into that kind of thing.
@Thunderf00t
@Thunderf00t 6 лет назад
a minor point... 4m V2s used ethanol water.... not methanol water.... other than that... an excellent appraisal :-)
@abbcc5996
@abbcc5996 3 года назад
booo. religion. jesus. muhammad. boooooo. try not to shit your pants
@somethinglikethat2176
@somethinglikethat2176 3 года назад
They did have a small problem with people employed on the project finding other uses for that ethanol...
@feetkeneddy9380
@feetkeneddy9380 3 года назад
Nerd
@donnerrob6615
@donnerrob6615 3 года назад
@@feetkeneddy9380 given the video you watched while writing this comment I would advice to maybe revise the idea of calling Somebody nerd XD
@frederickranger2340
@frederickranger2340 3 года назад
@@feetkeneddy9380 knowledge is power, you call him nerd, just shows how stupid you are.
@koala0884
@koala0884 7 лет назад
Womble is synonymous for "Did little damage" lol
@alexandersassaman1822
@alexandersassaman1822 7 лет назад
Funny thing is that I think SovietWomble is subscribed to this channel.
@SovietWomble
@SovietWomble 7 лет назад
Tis true!
@alexandersassaman1822
@alexandersassaman1822 7 лет назад
SovietWomble Cool. Now you have to work on getting other channels like the Great War to give you a shout-out.
@MilitaryHistoryVisualized
@MilitaryHistoryVisualized 7 лет назад
yeah, my SIGINT units tipped me off, but I needed confirmation.
@ThZuao
@ThZuao 7 лет назад
I think I've seen the guys from The Great War giving you a shoutout. I've seen them in your comment sections and I've seen you in theirs.
@BoarhideGaming
@BoarhideGaming 7 лет назад
Baited him out like a suicidal "URAH" charge. Good thinking
@johngeverett
@johngeverett 6 лет назад
Your presentations are always thorough and well researched, and you present the material in a matter-of-fact yet engaging manner. Keep up the good work!
@seiban8455
@seiban8455 7 лет назад
V2 to A4! You've captured my queen!
@victorrenevaldiviasoto9728
@victorrenevaldiviasoto9728 7 лет назад
- Goes to RU-vid - Sees shape of a rocket - Sees it's MHV - Clicks on video.
@solarfreak1107
@solarfreak1107 7 лет назад
Víctor René Valdivia Soto I'm a simple person.
@MilitaryAviationHistory
@MilitaryAviationHistory 7 лет назад
Might as well have sent over some Sauerkraut to cause them digestion troubles. I reckon that would have done more damage...
@MilitaryHistoryVisualized
@MilitaryHistoryVisualized 7 лет назад
Wunderkraut!
@MilitaryAviationHistory
@MilitaryAviationHistory 7 лет назад
It krauts wunders
@peterking2651
@peterking2651 7 лет назад
My father was ARP in London, on the receiving end of V1 & V2. He lived in the East End, by the docks, a main target. Ask him about having to cut out a person, who was still alive after a Doddle Bomb hit the building and collapsed a building on them.
@comradeivan3903
@comradeivan3903 6 лет назад
Peter King I hate the doddle bombs!
@deltoroperdedor3166
@deltoroperdedor3166 6 лет назад
Peter King this might come as a surprise to you, but bombs are designed to inflict damage
@willnettles2051
@willnettles2051 7 лет назад
This is what you do so well. Concise information, clear analysis. I always looked at the V-2 as bad for the Allies, but later good for the space program. You make an important point that the U.S. had plenty of resources while Germany had none to spare. You make an excellent case that by cost/affect it hurt the German war effort, which helped the Allies. So the A-4 was a win-win for the Allies. The case could be made that it was the first 'Star Wars' program--huge cost, little benefit. It is interesting that as there were no defense possible against a launched A-4, the Allies couldn't tie up resources, but with the V-1 for which there were many defenses, it cost the Allies more. The perfect weapon shouldn't be perfect, just vulnerable enough to keep the enemy busy. (If the US Defense Dept applies this logic they'll fly more drones at lower altitudes.) I understand this is about military history, so the people used as slave labor and the casualties they suffered may not be a direct factor; it is an important human factor. I'm guessing they were part of the 2,000,000 Aircraft worker number.
@specimen343
@specimen343 5 лет назад
No the allies lost actually because its no big deal to win with 100 times the land resources etc. There is general no soldierly honor or glory in that.
@williamzk9083
@williamzk9083 2 года назад
Most of the research into the V2 is poorly done and argued and don't take into account the plans for the missile and low production cost of the missile as mass production grew. -von Braun had promised an accuracy of 1 mil (1 part in 1000 so about 300m absolute at 300km range) but the V2 was rushed into production and had the interim LEV-3 guidance system which only gave 4.5km accuracy at 300km. The SG-66 was meant to achieve about 500m accuracy at 350km range. It was test flow a couple of times. Whereas the LEV-3 used only two gyroscopes and a single accelerometer to control missile speed the SG-66 had 3 gyros on a stable platform with additional acclerometers to control cross range drift. There was also the 'vollzirkel system' which had a penzil beam riding system to control the direction of the missile, doppler for speed and a radar transponder for speed. it operated only during the 70 seconds of boost and was expected to fulfill von Brauns 1 mil accuracy promise. -Production costs of a complete V2 missile were to drop to 4000 hours. That means that 40 workers could produce about 4 missile/month while 10,000 could produce about 1000/month. This is not a lot of costs for delivering 1000 tons of explosives to within 500m of target. Bombers need fighter escorts, 7 crew members and about the same number or maintenance crew plus a huge manufactruring costs (about 30,000 hours.bomber)
@Ace0nPoint
@Ace0nPoint 7 лет назад
I would also be interested to hear about what process was used for targeting, both the technical side that enabled aiming and what steps they went through pre firing in order to aim the thing.
@kyouhyung
@kyouhyung 7 лет назад
I just keep hearing V-1 and V-2 as "We Won" and "We Too" lol
@MilitaryHistoryVisualized
@MilitaryHistoryVisualized 7 лет назад
:D
@hallejohn
@hallejohn 7 лет назад
The Beitrag is quite interesting, but the Aussprache ist mir zu deutsch. So I couldn't listen longer than eine Minute of this video... +Military History Visualized Obwohl ich 'Denglish' verabscheue und es ungern benutze, aber so hört es sich vergleichsweise an. Du redest zwar Englisch, aber deine Aussprache ist typisch deutsch. Ich würde dir gerne weiter zuhören, aber es geht nicht :( Schade, weil deine Grammatik besser ist als meine. :)
@Nimmermaer
@Nimmermaer 6 лет назад
@hallejohn Typical German reaction. In my experience, it's always the Germans complaining about the German accent. Most others enjoy the flair ;)
@carebloodlaevathein6732
@carebloodlaevathein6732 3 года назад
@@hallejohn Kann halt nicht jeder Akzentarm/-frei englisch reden. Is nicht einfach. Ich persönlich hab auch fast 15 Jahre englisch reden müssen um es halbwegs akzentfrei hinzukriegen und selbst jetzt werde ich noch gelegentlich von englischen Muttersprachlern gefragt, ob ich Deutsch bin. Sieh's ihm also nach.
@thesupertsar4473
@thesupertsar4473 6 лет назад
"The most expensive and explosive popsicle of the Third Reich" is the best sentence I've ever heard.
@monstrok
@monstrok 7 лет назад
How timely! Today (video post date) I visited a museum with a cutaway version of full-size V-2 that was standing up in launch position. It is lot larger in person than books and videos seem to show.
@MacHamish
@MacHamish 7 лет назад
But at that late in the war did Germany have the pilots for the 24,000 planes that could have been built instead?
@DoddyIshamel
@DoddyIshamel 7 лет назад
Probably, i mean you are looking at 1943 and even earlier to start with. And those planes would be replacing older planes, you don't necessarily need new pilots. I mean with that production power you could have replaced all German front line aircraft with Jets (even allowing for jets using more resources).
@dereinepeterpan5637
@dereinepeterpan5637 7 лет назад
MacHamish The problem in the Luftwaffe never was a lack of planes, but the lack of fuel and pilots. In my opinion the V2 wasn 't a waste off resources
@luke6565
@luke6565 7 лет назад
The problem I see is the fuel for the 24000 planes. Since the V2 didn´t need oil(at least directly) it didn´t divert any of the very important fuel. Which was one of the biggest bottlenecks for everything with a combustion engine
@Wustenfuchs109
@Wustenfuchs109 7 лет назад
It wasn't a waste from our post-war point of view and advances it gave us. From someone who's got a war to win - it was a huge waste. The fuel production facility used very much electricity (coal) to produce and the whole project was very expensive in terms of strategic resources as well. For instance, the heat-resistant alloys that jet engines needed. For the price of the project, that was ongoing before the war (even before Hitler . Heer needed an long range artillery/bomber that could circumvent the 1919 agreement), indeed a lot of other things, with greater impact, could have been done. If nothing else, fuel production. Just imagine how much more effective would have the Luftwaffe been had the money and coal spent on V-2 been used for new synthetic fuel plants. Instead, they got an expensive short range single use bomber with limited punch and terrible accuracy who's only two good points were no pilot required and invulnerability. It was a waste no matter how you look at it, from a perspective of a military commander. Sure, it brought about the space age and after many years, more advanced rockets. But we are not talking about those - we are talking about 1943-1944 and a military who's resources have been cut in order to field a new, expensive, untested weapon with limited use. It is the same story as was with Hitler - in the late war Allies gave up on the idea of killing the man because decisions he was making made it easier for Allies. This gigantic waste of resources and industry included. To make it simple - in 1944 Germans needed defensive fighters, not inaccurate strategic bombers. So a weapon of an already limited use was even more useless. It is like if you were fighting a bunch of bees and I give you an assault rifle. Sure, a powerful weapon, and if you hit one, you are going to kill it for sure (if you hit - and that is a big if) but it would have been much better if, for the same money, I bought you a suit and some bug spray. But in 1943-1944, for such an enormous amount of resources to be spent in a thing such as V-2, it was not only a waste, it was a very idiotic decision. Killed more construction workers than the enemy, enough is said I believe.
@MrChickennugget360
@MrChickennugget360 7 лет назад
particularly because this was in 43-44 when Germany was still very much capable of fighting. by the time these weapons were functional the war was basically lost
@generally_empathetic
@generally_empathetic 7 лет назад
Seeing your posts after a long day of work is always worth it!
@MIron992
@MIron992 7 лет назад
I always thought the biggest nazi popsicle was the 6th army in stallingrad
@klayn5611
@klayn5611 7 лет назад
Not wrong
@Pfsif
@Pfsif 7 лет назад
Have some respect.
@MrChickennugget360
@MrChickennugget360 7 лет назад
too soon?
@narreddarr8092
@narreddarr8092 7 лет назад
Miron992 the first 'nazi' popsicle, ja. But the first 'popsicles' of WW2 were the Sovyet Armies in Finnland. But the joke about 'nazi' popsicles can also be applied to the Sovyet forces: near a train station on the road to Moscow after the mud froze and attained the consistency of iron, a Panzer Recon unit noticed a large body of troops in the fading light. A German Leutnant, with freezing hands, reached into his jacket to retrieve his Leica camera - with expensive Agfakrome film - to photograph what he and his unit could hardly believe... Standing upright in thin longcoats with rifles slung over their shoulders were about 200 Sovyet troops... packed together, huddled, frozen solid. All tightly packed together , presumably, to create warmth. The German unit approached cautiously and, aware that he was losing light to take a photograph, the Leutnant walked within 100 paces of what he suddenly realised was not just frozen men but also a cavalry unit of roughly 50 horsemen atop frozen solid animals. Human beings, waiting patiently and horribly aware of the predicament they were in, waiting for a relief train that never arrived? Simply waited and huddled together to try to remain warm for as long as possible. They were facing north east. The Leutnant, moved at the sight of so many men and beautiful animals frozen like statues as if carved from ice, raised his camera to take at least several photographs as his men refused to believe that living sentient beings could die standing upright, some with frozen sticks inbetween their fingers [cigarettes] and they refused to move closer as they believed it was some kind of Russyan trick or an unknown type of soldier in this vast alien landscape. But no breathe was exhaled from their lungs in such freezing weather so the Leutnant, emotionally shocked by the horrific spectacle, took several photos and as he awkwardly clicked away with frozen fingers, the camera barely working, a tear from his eye got into the viewfinder and cracked the camera casing somehow , thus, allowing light onto the film, ruining it altogether [and it was a Leica camera.. probably one of the best handheld cameras in the world back then]. Of course, at that moment he did not notice.. no for 5 weeks afterwards did he remember the camera... A single tear for their enemy had stopped the world from seeing an image that would likely not have been believed if they had been developed. Horsemen sitting upright proudly on their frozen mounts whilst crushed amongst and around them stood men, huddled as close as they could get, who looked as if they were posing for a photograph in the fading twilight. The ice particles upon their chins shone like diamonds. The snow was barely a metre deep but the cold in the wind cut like frozen blades. Barely one quarter of the Panzer Recon unit managed to make it back to their main unit, crammed into the 2 remaining SdKfz 222s. The young Leutnant and the few men left were declared wounded from severe frostbite and returned by train where they discovered they had lost fingers, toes, ears, eyelids and genitalia to the cruel Russyan Winter. The Leutnant chose to remain anonymous and believed that the single tear that caused the camera to expose the film was an act of god... he was the only one of them who chose to get up close and look into the faces of hundreds of dead frozen men and animals that had, barely 10 days before, probably wrote letters to their mothers and fathers, and wives and children. If the image had survived then, no doubt, the nazi partei would have published it in newspapers to glorify the image of the superiority of the Wehrmacht just before the propaganda footage of several young, well-fed and healthy semi-naked German actors danced around the snow, 'acting' as if they were happy-go-lucky Wehrmacht troops, enjoying their winter holiday in the fun of winter in Russya at -30 degrees Centigrade. Yes... the German High Command was so prepared for the Russyan winter that they were now having the club-footed, womanising dwarf, Goebbels, and the 'Master of the Hunt', Herman 'Meier' Goering, touring German cities collecting fur coats and stoles "just in case there were German troops without a warm jacket... you know... just to be on the safe side". Just over a decade later a rather outspoken, audacious US high ranking General landed a large force of US Marines with Infantry and Armour on the west coast of what was the conquered region of South Korea, several hundred miles north of the confident and jubliant North Korean Communist forces surrounding the battered remains of the American and South Korean forces, desperately hanging on to what was left of South Korea along the south and south east coast. This strategic en passe caught the North Koreans completely off-guard as the Americans landed and swiftly cut off the supply lines of the North Koreans way way in the south, believing they were on the very verge of making the whole of South East Asia communist. The North Koreans desperately raced back north to reach the 39th parallel - the agreed upon Partition Line that would keep North Korea 'communist' and South Korea 'democrat'. But this wasn't enough for the determined General MacArthur and, ignoring President truman's orders to not advance further than the 39th parallel, he gave orders for the US Armoured and Mechanised forces to annihilate the North Koreans once and for all as North Koreans were crossing into Chinese sovereign territory. With just a single order the support and respect between China and the USA, when they fought together to defeat the aggressive and violent expansionist Japanese from 1941-45, was wiped clean. As freezing US mechanised forces advanced further and further north, China suiddenly heeded the call to arms from an obviously defeated North Korean force. Companies, Battallions, Regiments, Divisions and Corps of US forces ran out of fuel, food and ammunition as McArthur ordered them to keep advancing to wipe communism from the South East peninsular once and for all. When the Chinese attacked they weren't attacking a determined victorious US Army with Air Superiority... no, they were attacking frozen, starving American troops with little ground support which the Chinese simply captured or brushed aside. If not for the US Army and Strategic Air Forces, the entire US force in Korea would have been bagged up. How long would President Truman hold out against calls to drop nukes on the communist Chinese whilst thousands of American young men were killed or captured? The US Air Forces managed to pin down the Chinese during the day so that, fortunately, many young American troops made it past the 39th Parallel. How many American young men froze solid, huddled together, without food, nor fuel and so far north it was impossible to consider marching south. President Truman immediately sacked McArthur. A great General but a bloody fool. And so began America's policy of 'expansion', costing the lives of young men, turning a benign China into a potentially serious 'threat to freedom and democracy'. I fank yew. I fank yew.
@klayn5611
@klayn5611 7 лет назад
Narred Darr Triggered much?
@theexam7394
@theexam7394 5 лет назад
I've been reading a book about the V weapons. Direct to the point, the rocket offensive on London was mainly just a series of field test flights. Hitler envisioned rockets that would carry much more destructive firepower that a single rocket will obliterate a large portion of, if not an entire a city. At that time, there was only one kind of firepower that fits the description- an atomic blast. All rockets from the Fi-103/V-1 to the grandest rocket they had planned, the A-10 "America" rocket, were all planned to carry this destructive firepower.
@smtx2117
@smtx2117 2 года назад
I've been saying the same thing for years... the purpose of the v2 was to carry a nuke... all these rockets fired were tests to refine it, luckily the war ended before they had refined their nukes as well
@JohnFrumFromAmerica
@JohnFrumFromAmerica 7 лет назад
best video on v2 ever. no mention of space nazis untill the end and then only as joke
@laurisikio
@laurisikio 3 года назад
You weren't clearly paying attention at 1:33
@decentish8546
@decentish8546 2 года назад
To put into context how small the amount of explosives delivered by V-1 and V-2s, the allies once dropped 3900 tons of bombs in one day on Dresden.
@donjones4719
@donjones4719 5 лет назад
Proposal: "We can deliver the same 1000kg warhead/bomb load as a pair of Stukas or a FW 190, for incredibly more money and resources, and be wildly less accurate." Hitler: "Build it."
@christianhoffmann8607
@christianhoffmann8607 5 лет назад
*Palpatine voice*: Do it
@mattilaiho7979
@mattilaiho7979 3 года назад
I mean I doubt you'd be getting the FWs and especially the Stukas through to allied targets by the late war, while as stated the V-2 was unstoppable once fired.
@Gronicle1
@Gronicle1 5 лет назад
Good video. Nicely done as most of your work seems to be. Thanks
@UprisenCOD
@UprisenCOD 7 лет назад
Bro are you a German who speaks perfect English or an Englishman who speaks perfect German? Never heard anyone fly through German and English words that smooth! Also, very interesting video!
@qzg7857
@qzg7857 5 лет назад
Im sure he is German
@AMpr0d
@AMpr0d 5 лет назад
@@qzg7857 Sherlock Holmes is on the case
@behindthen0thing525
@behindthen0thing525 4 года назад
@Großösterreichisches Reich nope. You're dogs of Switzerland
@Leon_der_Luftige
@Leon_der_Luftige 4 года назад
Großösterreichisches Reich High tier Germans who never contributed in anything when they teamed up with Germany.
@paint4r
@paint4r Год назад
@@qzg7857actually he is Austrian
@chrisyorke3013
@chrisyorke3013 5 лет назад
According to one source, it cost 350 man- hours to make a V1. Its body was mass-produced out of rolled sheet steel, about a tonne or so per craft. Skilled workers were paid about RM2000 a year. I am inclined to believe the lowest cost estimate of RM1500 per V1.
@lancelot1953
@lancelot1953 7 лет назад
Hi Bernhardt, great presentation as usual. You are bringing up an excellent point - the cost in resources and the very poor military capability of the V-2 rocket due to complexity, man-power/material required, poor guidance, limited accuracy (if any). The emotional effect could be significant as it became a priority for the Allied to destroy its bases and production facilities (including the killing the scientist involved in its development). At the same time, there is a principle (i.e. tactic) in waging a war where you "seduce", send, and/or let your enemy spend if not waste resources/energies on a under performing weapon system that may not perform or even exist. The idea being to either "bankrupt" your enemy, direct some of his resources in a "wild goose chase", or have him invest/divest assets away from weapon system that works. This is a big part of the "science" of war on a large scale that is taught at War Colleges. Ciao, L Kapitän zur See USN (Ret)
@williamzk9083
@williamzk9083 2 года назад
The poor military capability of the missile was a temporary thing. Most military analysts get this wrong. The mssile has been rushed into production and the deisgn frozen. The LEV-3 guidance system had poor accuracy (4.5km at maximum range according to German tests) and was and interim system while the SG-66 was developed. The SG-66 promised better than 500m accuracy. It was test flow several times. The vollzirkel system promised evern greater accuracy of 300m. It used a penzil, beam, doppler and a radar transponder. Production costs were expected to drop to below 4000 hours by the 16000th missile. In that sense rushing it into production made sense as it accelerated mass production. The B-29 also did not perform, at first.
@jimdecamp7204
@jimdecamp7204 6 лет назад
In his book, "The Wizard War", RAF science advisor Reginald V. Jones says that the Allies the biggest question about the V-2 project was not "How did they do it?", but rather "Why did they do?" They more or less asked the same questions as this video.
@chriscase1392
@chriscase1392 5 лет назад
"The Wizard War" is one of the more important books in my library. I've read it a dozen times if I've read it once. There is so much solid information in this book that it's hard to quantify. Jones was a pure genius and a classical scientist, and by sheer talent managed to have an influence, (and sometimes total influence), over nearly every significant technological breakthrough made by the Brits during the war. And he had a great sense of humor. Nice to see another fan of "The Wizard War."
@tollerkeks
@tollerkeks 7 лет назад
Quite interesting, and nice editing. To add something, it would be really interesting to point out that probabbly more people died during the production of this weapon than through its intended use.
@engespress
@engespress Год назад
Allies' propaganda.
@crabbytemptations1771
@crabbytemptations1771 7 лет назад
One point not mentioned in vid is that due to the speed of the V2 it's blast radius was smaller than V1- it basically dug so massive a crater it lost efficiency
@My-Opinion-Doesnt-Matter
@My-Opinion-Doesnt-Matter 5 лет назад
4:00 the fuel was ethanol-water, not methanol-water.
@mgibbs88
@mgibbs88 6 лет назад
Great video. Only comment is it used ethanol as fuel, not methanol. It was basically running on high proof vodka.
@DaniTheDeer
@DaniTheDeer 7 лет назад
Be careful, the north koreans might steal this design
@deltoroperdedor3166
@deltoroperdedor3166 6 лет назад
Joseph Stalin those gulag Republiks backfiring, ay?
@Jan_372
@Jan_372 6 лет назад
Joseph Stalin they still can't get it off the ground
@pteppig
@pteppig 6 лет назад
There was a great plan to use rocket spams on the battlefield, but someone Stalin
@satriorama4118
@satriorama4118 5 лет назад
To build new taepodong..?
@aramisone7198
@aramisone7198 3 года назад
The already stole the Scud and now they have a copy that looks like the Abraham's but it's China that is the sponsor.
@bjornsallmen4282
@bjornsallmen4282 4 года назад
Love your graphics in all your videos. Thanks!
@thunberbolttwo3953
@thunberbolttwo3953 7 лет назад
The SCUD is the Russian improved version of the V-2.
@patrichausammann
@patrichausammann 3 года назад
0:40 The "A" in the type designation of the "A4" stands for "aggregate" or "Aggregat" in German. This word is derived from Latin and means something like to inclose, to accumulate, multi-part components that are linked to one another (assembly) or in material science it means a component of a composite material that resists compressive stress and provides bulk to the composite material. So in this case it is the fourth unit type of a rocket. In the case of the aircraft presented, the name of the factory abbreviation precedes the number of the type. For example "Bf" stands for Bayrische Flugzeugwerke AG (Bavarian Aircraft Factories Corp.) or Me for Messerschmitt. "Fw" stands for Focke-Wulf-Werke or Focke-Wulf-Flugzeugbau AG renamed to a Focke-Wulf-Flugzeugbau GmbH after 1936 ( Focke-Wulf-Factories or Focke-Wulf Aircraft Construction Corp. {after 1936 -> Ltd.}) and "Fi" stands for Fieseler (i.e. Gerhard-Fieseler-Werke GmbH, in English Gerhard-Fieseler Factories Ltd. ). These designations have basically nothing to do with "Luftwaffe" (air force) designations.
@CrasyFingers
@CrasyFingers 3 года назад
what was the skin of the v2 rocket made of? i'm just curious to see how far they came before advanced aluminum alloys and carbon composites, and then going full circle and going back to steel with spaceX's starship
@GBOAC
@GBOAC 2 года назад
Starship uses stainless steel, V-2 uses ordinary steel just like most modern aircraft at the time and the V-1. The 'full circle' is a bit of a misunderstanding, it's particularly stainless steel which allows starship to remain strength in cryogenic temperatures as well as work as a heat shield. If that combination wasn't required, it would have made more sense to use a specific material for each specific function.
@verbalpressure
@verbalpressure 4 года назад
Great video. I think there's also a link between the initial V2 attacks and the decision to launch Operation Market Garden.
@thelovertunisia
@thelovertunisia 3 года назад
If we take into consideration how much and what the allies had to invest in order to counter the V-weapons, this is a complicated benchmark because the allies, mainly the US has enormous resources and so they could do multiple things without really affecting their war effort unlike Germany.
@bandwagon22
@bandwagon22 7 лет назад
About 5.6% of Western Allied bombs dropped in European theaters of war were targeting V-1 and V-2 stations. If taking share of bombing missions the slice was even much bigger because most of combat missions were made by single or two motor aircraft, not by heavy bombers. And Germany used likely more than 3 billion Reichsmark for developing and manufactoring V-2 rockets. Sum similar than building 34 000 Pzkw IV or StuG III combat armor.
@WinHippopotamus
@WinHippopotamus 7 лет назад
Vonce ze rockets are up Who cares vhere zhey come down? Zhat's not my department Says Wernher von Braun
@binaway
@binaway 6 лет назад
to quote Tom Lehrer from his song "Wernher von Braun"
@samuelparker9882
@samuelparker9882 6 лет назад
WinHippopotamus Probably MORE RIGHT than you'd ever think. He TRULY DIDN'T CARE... OR WHO FUNDED HIS RESEARCH. JUST AS LONG AS HE COULD CONTINUE. BRAUN... A CLOSET NAZI; THROUGH AND THROUGH TO THE CORE.
@WilliamJones-Halibut-vq1fs
@WilliamJones-Halibut-vq1fs 3 года назад
No that ignorant Tom Leher ignorance and idiocy. von Braun did make it his department as to where they came down. In 1941 the British Government issued the "Area Bombardment Directive" to RAF Bomber Command. The Directive ordered that The residential population of German cities be bombed to 'de-house" and "demoralise" them. The official terms: "Area bombardment", "dehousing" and "demoralisation": was deliberate terror carpet bombing of civilians. Arthur "Bomber" Harris noted that in one of the first instances of bombing, that of the medieval coastal city of Lubeck, that no specific target was chosen and the geometric centre of the city was the target. The Luftwaffe did not do this. It bombed military and industrial targets, only after RAF attacks on Berlin and Munich, but caused massive collateral damage around the area. The used an extremely accurate blind bombing aid x-geraete. The V2 and V1 (reprisal weapons) were used to submit Britain to a counter terror to force Britain to the negotiation table and negotiate a mutual end to city bombardment. The initial guidance system of the V2 was interim and not very accurate and was known as the LEV-3. It had two gyros (vertikant and horizont) and one PIGA accelerometer. Accuracy in testing was 4.5 km. If a beaming riding system known as Viktoria was used the lateral dispersion was halved. It was used in in 30% of cases. If a doppler instead of accelerometer system was used for engine cut of downrange accuracy increased 10%. von Braun had wanted to hold off on the V2 until the SG-66 system and Vollzirkel system came into use. Both had an accuracy of 500m, as good as anything else in WW2. Vollzirkel used a pencil beam riding system from a 9cm radar with doppler and transponder range control. 50cm and 27cm versions had already been developed but they suffered from ground plane interference. The 9cm version did not suffer from this. SG-66 had a stable gimbaled platform with lateral accelerometer to null out cross winds. Bearings for the accelerometers and gyros were given a dither to eliminate stiction. The Winged V2 would have been even more accurate as it could be command guided on reentry. 30 meter accuracy was expected. The system was known as Wasserspiegel was based on transponders and giant freya radars on their side.
@Othello484
@Othello484 7 лет назад
Really interesting. Thanks! I didn't realize it was such a drain on resources.
@deluca1031
@deluca1031 3 года назад
> -Larry "Pixy" Foulke
@NSEBMB
@NSEBMB 3 года назад
Was searching for this comment
@kingmarsh4657
@kingmarsh4657 3 года назад
@noelblack8159
@noelblack8159 5 лет назад
Dude I’ve never heard so good German as you can speak I am German so it means something! Gute Arbeit! 👍🏻 (Good Work)
@FGKaye
@FGKaye 5 лет назад
I think the important question is; how many ME 262's could have been built with the V-1, 2, money & resources ?
@mcfontaine
@mcfontaine 6 лет назад
I was lucky enough to interview a lady who worked tracking V2’s in Europe in late 44. They would work backwards using the trajectory to guess where the mobile launcher was. These plots were then radioed to patrolling fighter bombers to search and destroy.
@paulochikuta330
@paulochikuta330 7 лет назад
wee weapons xD
@michaeldaly9264
@michaeldaly9264 5 лет назад
As always, this site provides an excellent quick snapshot & analysis of aspects of military history. If only our present-day leaders & politicians were as smart!
@joostteboekhorst9914
@joostteboekhorst9914 6 лет назад
suprisingly, this kinda means the versaille treaty is the first spark that causes the space race.
@MilitaryHistoryVisualized
@MilitaryHistoryVisualized 6 лет назад
hmm interesting point!
@kingslushie1018
@kingslushie1018 5 лет назад
That’s what I thought!
@benwilson6145
@benwilson6145 3 года назад
Maybe the spark was the Nazi's wish for "Lebensraum ".
@WagesOfDestruction
@WagesOfDestruction 3 года назад
V-1 was possibly the best weapon system in WW2 based on a cost/benefit basis. Also, check out the book "Hitler's terror weapons ' by Roy Iran for a fascinating study on them. I think his theory could explain many other situations such as Iraq vs Israel in the first Gulf War
@BakedDrLuny
@BakedDrLuny 7 лет назад
The V2 had strategic significance, providing a certain level of deterrence against the use of chemical or biological weapons against German cities. Even if the Germans' delivery capabilities weren't actually very well-developed, the threat of a nerve agent response to the use of chemical weapons on the battlefield or in strategic bombing helped keep the war in Europe conventional.
@alesksander
@alesksander 2 года назад
This. Luckily they dint developed Nuclear bomb first. Furthermore some Germans even helped Americans.
@gordonlawrence3537
@gordonlawrence3537 7 лет назад
The most expensive popsicle of the Third Reich. LMAO I was laughing about that for ages.
@wuugaa6776
@wuugaa6776 7 лет назад
I'd love to see a video on the guiding systems of the V2 and V1
@teaser6089
@teaser6089 3 года назад
ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-Ph-npS29n9Q.html This 8 year old video talks about the guidance system of the V2
@overmind06
@overmind06 3 года назад
@@teaser6089 in short: compass for direction, angle for distance.
@hugolindum7728
@hugolindum7728 7 лет назад
Love the " 'Allo 'Allo" Herr Flick accent.
@gammainc1666
@gammainc1666 7 лет назад
deserves a lot more subs #getMHVto1millionsubs
@herp_derpingson
@herp_derpingson 7 лет назад
Did you mean U-boats? (:
@deltoroperdedor3166
@deltoroperdedor3166 6 лет назад
JA
@almirante_kiko
@almirante_kiko 5 лет назад
Submarines ???
@richardhince9764
@richardhince9764 6 лет назад
Great video - I loved the analysis!
@pepperspray7386
@pepperspray7386 7 лет назад
I imagine there was an internal struggle over whether the German Army or Air Force controlled the rocket programs. The US military has the same problems even now with the ranges of field artillery pushing the Fire Support Coordination Line farther back, and making coordination of no fly zones (do to missiles flying through the air) much more complicated. The ATACMS system caused a kerfuffle between Army and Air Force generals is my most recent example of this. None of that really means much when there are no more battle lines, as war has become completely nonlinear. Or it has, until two or more world powers clash again.
@theholyinquisition389
@theholyinquisition389 2 года назад
That struggle, albeit between the navy and the air force is also the reason that there was no naval air arm in the Wehrmacht, despite one existing in the Imperial German navy.
@williamzk9083
@williamzk9083 2 года назад
The Army always funded the A4 because they saw it as ultra large artillery. They weren't allowed to develoip super guns due to treaty of versailes but nothing was said of ballistic missiles. The SS did try to take control of the V2 program and it led to von Brauns arrest as part of a ploy.
@edgarvalderrama1143
@edgarvalderrama1143 2 года назад
JUST POSTED ELSEWHERE. 96 yr; old WWII vet, some memory loss: I think I also remember a V bomb that sputtered, rather than pulsed. I also remember watching a V-2 (the straight up and straight down rocket) rising in the dark as we stealthily approached the Rhine. I thought "Poor Londoners, there goes one (completely unstoppable) of those blockbusters at them." I later read they were aiming at the Ludendorff bridge to hinder our Rhine crossing. I was pitying the Londoners while the damn thing was aimed at me! (practically)
@bandwagon22
@bandwagon22 6 лет назад
V-2 just underlined the fact how much WW2 production was concentrated to air-sea warfare while armies of almost all big powers (with Soviet U only exception) got relatively small share of munitions. Unlike mainstream historians are claiming WW2 was not mostly at all series of "decisive land battles". More likely it was mostly huge effort to build air and sea power. Take or leave it but those having air superiority won battles. When air cover was gone armies became just pray for enemy forces.
@tisFrancesfault
@tisFrancesfault 7 лет назад
V2 was great at cutting allied development costs post war though, thanks Germany! p.s. hah, Sovietwomble :')
@misterscienceguy
@misterscienceguy 7 лет назад
tisFrancesfault The contribution of Nasi scientists is greatly exaggerated, but it definitely helped.
@Fischer0Dude
@Fischer0Dude 7 лет назад
I would need to look in my books, but the Americans failed to any thing more then make large explosions until Braun was put in charge. Which of course, culminated in the Saturn V. If for instance the Soviets got all the German scientists, everyone, the U.S.S.R would be the first to the moon and likely an unmatched world power.
@mickeyg7219
@mickeyg7219 7 лет назад
+Fischer0Dude Didn't Goddard successfully launched liquid fuel rockets many years before V2? It wasn't manned, but I'm pretty sure that's more than "nothing except large explosions."
@Wombat1916
@Wombat1916 7 лет назад
Fischer0Dude From Wiki (I know!): "Goddard successfully launched his model on March 16, 1926 ushering in an era of space flight and innovation. He and his team launched 34 rockets[3] between 1926 and 1941, achieving altitudes as high as 2.6 km (1.6 mi) and speeds as fast as 885 km/h (550 mph)". They were liquid fuelled, btw. Between the wars, rockets were envisaged as carriers of mail! All the film I've ever seen of German attempts usually pancaked not more than 50 ft from the launcher. In "The Right stuff" there is a small but hilarious section on the early US rockets not quite lifting off or exploding in flight.
@Fischer0Dude
@Fischer0Dude 7 лет назад
Goddard died in 1945, there fore he is irrelevant to NASA, and the Space Race in general. Goddard's Rockets were out of their league compared to Von Braun's. Mind you Von Braun had Millions of Marks to spend / develop his rockets, keep in mind the V2 was the fist object to cross the boundary of space. Nothing Goddard produced could compete. The put my comment into better perspective, the U.S had a race between U.S Navy rockets and U.S army rockets (before NASA) and a modified rocket by Van Braun (Red Stone if I recall) put the first Western Satellite into orbit. If Von Braun and the rest of his team didn't surrender to the U.S.A, it would likely be the Soviets with a huge monopoly on space in the Cold War. Possibly even shutting the U.S.A out, and landing man on the Moon.
@EdMcF1
@EdMcF1 Год назад
My favourite Wunderwaffe clash was the V-3 cannon near Calais, which met a Tallboy.
@injusticeanywherethreatens4810
Do you Luftwaffe? sounds a bit like 'Do you lift?'. Thanks for the video!
@larkin54
@larkin54 7 лет назад
I love your content! I'd be interested in your take on Operation Market Garden, similar to your research or Barbarossa
@jackclark5893
@jackclark5893 7 лет назад
I like rockets
@MilitaryHistoryVisualized
@MilitaryHistoryVisualized 7 лет назад
a bit too much it seems
@Bird_Dog00
@Bird_Dog00 7 лет назад
AH Big, highly errect, phallic objects that go off at the slightest prompting? Go figure...
@jesuschristusnumberonefan
@jesuschristusnumberonefan 7 лет назад
too autistic to win the war or not autistic enough im not quite sure we need to repeat the whole thing and vary the autism
@roberth.goddardthefatherof6376
then you should know who i am. and you should know these germans copied my designs.
@Jan_372
@Jan_372 6 лет назад
Robert H. Goddard nein
@sebaak4651
@sebaak4651 Год назад
This might be a old vid... but i can still use it for the assignment i have. i love it
@313sib
@313sib 5 лет назад
Another interesting fact about the V2 was that more people were killed making it that it killed in action according to estimates. That makes it almost unique in actually deployed weapons of war.
@engespress
@engespress Год назад
That's propaganda.
@wcg19891
@wcg19891 Год назад
Only if truth and facts are propaganda.
@ponddipper91
@ponddipper91 7 лет назад
Will you ever do a video concerning the Nazi atom-bomb program? Or are there no sources for it? Great video as usual!!
@borkwoof696
@borkwoof696 7 лет назад
Can you do a video on the Dora Geschütz?
@KeithGadget
@KeithGadget 5 лет назад
My grandparents were adults during WW2, and my parents children during the war; all living in South East England throughout the war.. One thing you have not touched on is that these were "terror weapons", and they were very good at striking fear/terror into the population. The V-1 due to the sound it made, and when the engine stopped everyone knew that soon there would be a loud explosion. But the V-2 there was no warning, no engine sound, no air raid warnings. But a massive explosion. This was the terror, not feeling safe that there would be a warning. The V-weapons were also successful in showing how more advanced the German technology was over the allies. So all in all, the V-weapons were very successful at: 1/. Striking fear into the people. 2/. Lowering morale. Which is what a terror weapon does.
@chriscase1392
@chriscase1392 5 лет назад
When a V-2 hit the ground, it produced two loud "booms." The first was the warhead exploding. There was no warning of its approach since it was moving too fast to pick up. The second "boom" was the sound of the sound barrier being broken by the rocket. English scientists became aware of the rocket as it was being developed and accurately predicted the double boom. When they head that first double boom they knew that the rocket had successfully passed the development stage and was actively being used against Allied targets.
@isawthesun
@isawthesun 7 лет назад
Could you do a video on wehrmacht myths? Thanks.
@tokyozardoz
@tokyozardoz 7 лет назад
The V2 program was a huge expenditure of money, labor, and resources to deliver a relatively minuscule amount of ordinance.
@ariancontreras4358
@ariancontreras4358 4 года назад
I remember there was an anecdote of some of the allied generals praising the V-1 as an potentially effective weapon for both being relatively cheap to manufacture and develop as well as being potentially effective weapon. Not to mention it tied up their resources to shoot it down like you said. The same generals supposedly thought the V-2 project was a waste of time for the generals.
@TommygunNG
@TommygunNG 3 года назад
Don't waste resources defending against something you can't defend against.
@BrianPatronie
@BrianPatronie 7 лет назад
You're good brother, really good...keep it up!
@sirreepicheeprules7443
@sirreepicheeprules7443 4 года назад
The V-2 rocket effectiveness is certainly debatable, an Allied admiral said D-Day might have been postponed if the Germans had launched them at British ports and a german general of the Luftwaffe said the resources and efforts put into the rocket program would have been better utilized developing fighter aircraft to deal with the allied air raids. Both have valid points, but Hitler wanted to terrorize the civilians in London...
@WilliamJones-Halibut-vq1fs
@WilliamJones-Halibut-vq1fs 3 года назад
In 1941 the British Government issued the "Area Bombardment Directive" to RAF Bomber Command. The Directive ordered that The residential population of German cities be bombed to 'de-house" and "demoralise" them. The official terms: "Area bombardment", "dehousing" and "demoralisation": was deliberate terror carpet bombing of civilians. Arthur "Bomber" Harris noted that in one of the first instances of bombing, that of the medieval coastal city of Lubeck, that no specific target was chosen and the geometric centre of the city was the target. The Luftwaffe did not do this. It bombed military and industrial targets, only after RAF attacks on Berlin and Munich, but caused massive collateral damage around the area. The used an extremely accurate blind bombing aid x-geraete. The V2 and V1 (reprisal weapons) were used to submit Britain to a counter terror to force Britain to the negotiation table and negotiate a mutual end to city bombardment. That's why they were called reprisal or incorrectly vengeance weapons. The initial guidance system of the V2 was interim and not very accurate and was known as the LEV-3. It had two gyros (vertikant and horizont) and one PIGA accelerometer. Accuracy in testing was 4.5 km. If a beaming riding system known as Viktoria was used the lateral dispersion was halved. It was used in in 30% of cases. If a doppler instead of accelerometer system was used for engine cut of downrange accuracy increased 10%. von Braun had wanted to hold off on the V2 until the SG-66 system and Vollzirkel system came into use. Both had an accuracy of 500m, as good as anything else in WW2. Vollzirkel used a pencil beam riding system from a 9cm radar with doppler and transponder range control. 50cm and 27cm versions had already been developed but they suffered from ground plane interference. The 9cm version did not suffer from this. SG-66 had a stable gimbaled platform with lateral accelerometer to null out cross winds. Bearings for the accelerometers and gyros were given a dither to eliminate stiction. The Winged V2 would have been even more accurate as it could be command guided on reentry. 30 meter accuracy was expected. The system was known as Wasserspiegel was based on transponders and giant freya radars on their side.
@marrvynswillames4975
@marrvynswillames4975 3 года назад
problem is: the V-2 was imprecise, that's why they shot at cities, who can't move and are big enough so you will hit. but even when they hit, the allies lots of times made fake reports and let the germans read, making they changing targets and miss more often
@KrGsMrNKusinagi0
@KrGsMrNKusinagi0 3 года назад
churchill wanted the nazis to focus on civilians instead of military targets.. Helped the british military recover during the blitz
@jsl151850b
@jsl151850b Год назад
Thanks! One of the Science Fiction magazines of the era said that the V-2 was an amazing achievement but virtually useless as a weapon of war. At least that was money NOT going to bomber production.
@ottopike737
@ottopike737 7 лет назад
I've always wondered about the effectiveness of the V2. do you believe that modern rocket systems are equally cost ineffective?
@carebloodlaevathein6732
@carebloodlaevathein6732 3 года назад
Every system that is designed to explode is kinda cost ineffective, tbf. I mean, let's take the modern Tomahawk Cruise Missile for example: If you think about it, it's just a VERY expensive firework. It's honestly stupid how much precious metals and rare earths we stuff into these things just to blow it all up. Just think about how many smartphones or GTX 3090s you could produce instead. It's bonkers. ^^"
@williamzk9083
@williamzk9083 2 года назад
The argument that the V2 was ineffective is poorly researched. The missile was only in service from September 7 1944 and had been rushed into production. The first batch of missiles took 16,000 hours to make each. After 10,000 this would drop to 6000 hours (about that of a fighter aircraft) and after 16,000 production to 4000 hours. The accuracy was poor because of the LEV-3 guidance system having only a single acclerometer and gyros with drift rates that were higher than diesiered. Accuracy should have increased to 300m to 500m with the vollzirkel microwave beam riding system and the SG-66 inertial guidance system respectively. (SG-66 was test flown a few times, vollzirkel was also being tested) Despite the high cost of the V2 it was very cheap to opperate. No airfield, no flight crew, no airfield defences etc. So within a few months V2 could have been hitting at a rate of about 350/week to an accuracy of 300m/500m. A workforce of 35,000 would be enough to produce this quantity of missiles.
@oldgysgt
@oldgysgt 7 лет назад
This confirms something I have been saying for some time; the V weapons were a waste of time, money, and resources, (both human resources and raw materials). The V weapons were just as silly as the “Paris Gun”; a great technological achievement, but nothing that was going to win the war.
@Idahoguy10157
@Idahoguy10157 5 лет назад
24,000 fighters only works if have the pilots, the ground crews, and the fuel to fly them. In retrospect the resources spent on the V1 and V2 only got less back than if manned conventional weapons had been produced. But that falsely assumes German had manpower it didn’t.
@24680kong
@24680kong 5 лет назад
They had some 200,000 people on the V2 project. I have no idea how many people were needed to build and maintain the planes, but they should be able to get plenty of people. Even having only 1000 extra planes and pilots would have caused the allies more damage than the V2 project did.
@yummyyum4626
@yummyyum4626 7 лет назад
I am so in love with this channel!
@221b-l3t
@221b-l3t 7 лет назад
It wasn´t a total waste. It made the space age possible and so is one of the more important inventions of the 20th centuries. But yes as a weapon pretty useless. More people died building it than it killed as a weapon.
@MilitaryHistoryVisualized
@MilitaryHistoryVisualized 7 лет назад
it was a complete waste in the military context of WW2. For the other stuff I agree, but this is outlined in the conclusion too.
@221b-l3t
@221b-l3t 7 лет назад
True, should have phrased that differently. Great channel btw!
@WilliamJones-Halibut-vq1fs
@WilliamJones-Halibut-vq1fs 7 лет назад
The V2 was brought into service a little too soon and entered service with a provisional and inaccurate guidance system called LEV-3. Had the improvements in accuracy, cost, range and material substitution come through the V2 would have been a cost effective weapon. 1 After the 10,000th V2 production man hours was expected to fall from 16,000 per missile to under 4000. 2 The “vollzirkel” guidance system had been testing and was expected to increase accuracy to 500m at maximum range. It used a beam riding system to control V2 missile position during its 70 second boost to ensure 500m accuracy on reentry. Even with terminal missile tumbling far more accurate than allied heavy bombers averages. 3 SG-66 gudance System with side drift accelerometers in gimbals was expected to also achieve accuracy of 500m. Several were test flown. 4 The winged A4b flew two test flights. The wings not only extended range but allowed terminal missile control to within 120 meters by virtue of long radar horizon. The guidance system was called “Wasserspiegel” used Wassermann radars laid on side and Neuling or Erstling IFF transponders for range. It could converted to midcourse guidance in case of jamming. 5 V2 costs tend to be inflated by adding development costs into production costs unlike say the even more expensive B-29 program. They are also inflated for ideological reasons. 6 Purpose of the Reprisal or revenge weapon was to provide a counter terror to negotiate an cessation to allied bombing. 7 It would have been a sucesfull weapon bar a few months of improvements. 8 My refernces are Fritz Trenkle book on german guidance systems and Frank Reuters book on thev A4/V2 and V1. (See lulu books) also the CIOS files on cvbandts website for german electronics.
@nekdo_kavc
@nekdo_kavc 6 лет назад
221 b Well basically the Germans got Americans on the Moon because if it.
@kingslushie1018
@kingslushie1018 5 лет назад
I mean if you put a nuclear weapon on it, then the project becomes much more useful. But yeah, it was a complete and utter waste of resources during WW2 with compared the the carpet bombing program
@WagesOfDestruction
@WagesOfDestruction 4 года назад
Please do one on the V-1, it was probably one of the most cost/effective weapons of ww2.
@heinzguderian8521
@heinzguderian8521 7 лет назад
If there whould have just been enough time to Combine the V2 with the Landkreuzer Ratte Germany whould have definitly won the war
@TheSchultinator
@TheSchultinator 7 лет назад
Heinz Guderian Until the Allies dropped Tallboy bombs on the Ratte...
@heinzguderian8521
@heinzguderian8521 7 лет назад
Tss. Then we could have just used a schweren Gustav to shoot down these planes.
@shellshockedgerman3947
@shellshockedgerman3947 7 лет назад
Heinz Guderian I expected something better from you Guderian...
@MrAnonymousRandom
@MrAnonymousRandom 7 лет назад
Then why is your username Guderian? Guderian would have been pissed at how slow the Ratte was if it even made it to trials. Post war tank developments were all based on the Panther's design philosophy.
@sevenproxies4255
@sevenproxies4255 7 лет назад
Probably not. But I damn sure would've wanted to see a V-2 slinging Landkreuzer rolling across a field made a reality. So badass! :D
@CountArtha
@CountArtha 6 лет назад
Most of the engineers who worked on the V-2 knew perfectly well that it was a waste of military resources. They basically took advantage of a wartime emergency to expedite their personal pet project - but considering who they were working for, that's not necessarily a bad thing. Von Braun gave the U.S. government the same treatment when he went to work for the Army, always asking for more funding than he needed so he could stay ahead of schedule. If he'd gotten his way on the Moon landings, the mission architecture (including a giant space station with artificial gravity) would have made Project Apollo look modest.
@jeremylister89
@jeremylister89 5 лет назад
Oh the German language. Why use 3 letters when 27 will do.😁
@javiergilvidal1558
@javiergilvidal1558 4 года назад
Well, if you compare "Calculus of Probability" with "Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung", you will see that the Germans don´t waste so many letters after all.... oh, and they save the inter-word spaces!
@yesyesyesyes1600
@yesyesyesyes1600 7 лет назад
Wasn't the Stalinorgel a kind of rocket system too? What did the other Allies have in comparison? Could you make a spinoff video on rockets in ww2 in comparison?
@LAV-25A2_56
@LAV-25A2_56 3 года назад
>
@Moofenic
@Moofenic 3 года назад
>
@AltosaotomeOat
@AltosaotomeOat 3 года назад
@fredferd965
@fredferd965 2 года назад
Your arguments are logical and compelling. I would like to point out that hitler (may he rot) probably wasn't doing this for logical reasons. He was doing it to create terror and fear among his enemies. How effective the V-2 was in that regard, I do not know. The V-1 certainly caused a lot of terror. hitler's mind was filled with mysticism and political theory, which frequently flew in the face of logical reality. It's been pointed out that if the British had decided to build a Lancaster bomber, fly it once over Germany, and then crash it into the ground, that would be what the Germans were doing with the V-2....An expensive waste of money and resources. EXCELLENT VIDEO!
@ABaumstumpf
@ABaumstumpf 7 лет назад
I'm rather certain that you should use the metric measurements and derive the us customary units form that, and not the other way around. It is a bit unlikely that the nazis would use US units to get those round numbers....
@markholm7050
@markholm7050 7 лет назад
Fuel for the V-2/A-4 is always listed as ethanol-water, not methanol-water. The Wikipedia article on the V-2 says, "The V-2 consumed a third of Germany's fuel alcohol production and major portions of other critical technologies:[57] to distil the fuel alcohol for one V-2 launch required 30 tonnes of potatoes at a time when food was becoming scarce.[58]"
@RCAvhstape
@RCAvhstape 6 лет назад
The USAF definition of where space begins is 50 miles, so technically the V2 was the first space weapon, thus Space Nazis were a real thing.
@specimen343
@specimen343 5 лет назад
The Nazis had some rockets up in space at 200km above ground.
@Jim73
@Jim73 7 лет назад
I really like the topics you cover and the information you provide, but the videos are definitely hindered by a very poor graphics/video presentation. I really hope you will pursue more informational graphics/video.
@ettorefassina356
@ettorefassina356 7 лет назад
hahaha Wee Weapons... made me laugh
@LtKharn
@LtKharn 7 лет назад
It's the noise they make when they fly :p
@kofManKan
@kofManKan 6 лет назад
You do some unique and interesting shit. Keep it up. Oh, and well done sir!
@ottlakafka3409
@ottlakafka3409 7 лет назад
The most expensive popstickle of the 3rd reich...man you have some good jokes :D
@robertskrzynski2768
@robertskrzynski2768 6 лет назад
According to my mother these were both scary weapons as there was no warning and that affected the morale of the civilians, by quite a bit.
@jonjonsson6323
@jonjonsson6323 3 года назад
It was extremely effective in terms of psycology , it scared people shitless as no one knew where next would land. In that regards it does not matter how many was made or even if the full payload went off or just the rocket impact of flight. I remember people saying that the v-1 wich was a problem in itself were at least possible to hear and see, these just came from nowhere and that was much worse than when the bombers flew over.
@LuvBorderCollies
@LuvBorderCollies 7 лет назад
One of my dad's friends lived in southern Netherlands during the war and witnessed dozens launched. Whenever the lauching trucks would show up they dropped what they were doing because they were in for a good show. He has no stats but the V2 often failed at launch, right after lauch or shortly after launch. The most hilarious V2 failures were the ones that went up maybe a 1000 feet then the gyro whacked out causing the V2 to do crazy loops around the sky before hitting earth. The fun part was watching the Germans run like rabbits to get away from the rocket. Other times the V2 would go up then explode. Then other times it would launch up a few thousand feet and the engine would stop = running Germans. LOL But occasionally the V2 would obliterate everything without leaving the ground.
@matshagglund3550
@matshagglund3550 6 лет назад
There is a thing called "learning curve" or "learning by doing". If they have had these weapons in 1942 they would have had much more reliable, more powerful and more accurate rockets in 1944.
@binaway
@binaway 4 года назад
A lot of the British AA guns were crewed by the Home guard and the Woman army members. These forces would never have left Britain, partly because the Luftwaffe threat still existed and the extra use of AA rounds against the V2 the would have been hardly noticeable at that point of the war. The small number of RAF fighters required would have had an insignificant effect on the allied air superiority over Europe.
@ThieflyChap
@ThieflyChap 6 лет назад
Fun fact: We (Britain) used to call the V1s Doodlebugs as a nickname. I think it was because of the sound they made.
Далее
German AA Missiles - An Efficient Alternative to Flak?
12:06
Kamikaze Tactics - Insane or Rational?
22:59
Просмотров 465 тыс.
НИКИТА ПОДСТАВИЛ ДЖОНИ 😡
01:00
Просмотров 132 тыс.
German Infantry Anti-Tank Tactics 1941/1942
10:55
Просмотров 820 тыс.
The America Rocket - WWII German Space Weapon
11:12
Просмотров 766 тыс.
V-2 Rocket, Hanomag SS100, Meillerwagen - 1/72 Takom
19:47
Building the V2 rocket engine
35:44
Просмотров 35 тыс.
A4 / V2 Rocket in detail: umbilical cable system
12:16
Просмотров 116 тыс.