The Vanished Village of Angikuni Lake 

I remember flying from San Diego to Adak Alaska. This was in 1979. I was stunned at all the wilderness myself. I remember how often I'd heard we were over populated. Well I thought , they haven't seen this vast wilderness. I was humbled at how our forefathers managed to survive at all.

How can you determine things thay are being actively covered up and and things that didn't even happen?

and with that being correct ,then i doubt any investigation will take place...therefore forever leaving it unsolved....

Does anyone know the music's name?

He said he feared the village fell to a disease. He was probably worried about the dogs being infected aswell, and didn't to spread it.

He didn't bring the dogs because he made the whole thing up

Exactly, unbelievable

@@eyetrollin710 I kinda figured that after it was said some animal bones were found & also fish in a pot, the dogs would have certainly eaten those 🙂

no matter wat -I agree

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-oEvCSRVbXCg.html&ab_channel=HammersonPeters

@@HammersonPeters Thank you :)

You raise a good point, actually. Now, I don't know if this story is true or not, but one of the arguments I hear against it is, oh, there isn't enough documentation from official sources. Well...maybe you have hit on a reason why.

😪💔

Yeah the RCMP never lie 🙄 🥱

I was thinking they were enslaved, or taken by cannibals considering no bones, or remains were found anywhere. You would think they would have taken the dogs, and all their valuables as well if that were the case though. Other than some sort of supernatural explanation, I can't think of anything else besides the hoax being most accurate. The dogs make the story less believable to me. Leaving them behind, making up a story about fishing and feeding them when he was so scared he wanted to leave. Just doesn't make sense he would have took the time to do that, and then leave the dogs behind thinking they were diseased. If they couldn't feed themselves before he got there, he was leaving them to die regardless. Claiming to hang around, in fear, just to feed the dogs, only to leave them to die just isn't logical.

The one thing I make a point of in every mysterious disappearance to never trust the official authorized conclusion.

Yup! They don’t bother to “officially debunk” unless it’s true, in my experience

Thanks for saying so! I typically draw them in Microsoft PowerPoint and/or Photoshop, and make multiple images for stop motion animation. Some of the fancier touches (ex. the falling snow) are cookie-cutter effects on Wondershare Filmora.

@@HammersonPeters awesome. thank you : )

i agree that both probably did occur...but when it comes to what did it,idk but it seems it must have been very terrible ,probably stranger than the usual suspects attached to these type of reports..because most tribes know of the usual suspects via folklore....

The one thing I make a point of in every mysterious disappearance to never trust the official authorized conclusion.

I think most evidence for Dyatlov points to the Soviet government covering something up. Some sort of military operation, or weapons testing. Having so much radiation on them, lack of animal bites/claws, and the way they scattered makes it seem more like some sort of weapon attack. Then afterwards, the coverup. USSR was incredibly secretive, and most evidence of the incident was hidden for decades. IIRC new evidence came out within the last couple of years, but I am not certain. As for this one...I have to believe that this small tribe was enslaved, and taken away to be sold, or used by who took them as slaves, or cannibalism. The lack of bodies, and most importantly bones, makes me believe that whatever demise they were subjected to didn't happen there. Animals would have left at the very least bones. Unless of course it was some sort of supernatural event, which is the only other way I can think of where there would be no remains left behind. Definitely could just be a hoax too. What "culprit" do you think it was? You mentioned it that you felt it was the "same culprit for their disappearances", but didn't explain what exactly that was.

You're sure of this? And your proof.

​@@lenBrill1971 proof that something DIDN'T happen? Surely the burden of proof lies upon those making a positive claim, to dismiss it is sometimes unwise but ultimately the claims of the event are what need to be confirmed

@@w8m4n Well you must work for the RCMP because they're the only ones to claim that it never happened. And we know the RCMP never lie.

Don't worry, I'm not making it a habit. But I did want to do a big piece on urban legends, which this story is a part of.

I agree. Native people were known to sacrifice themselves if they got sick, to avoid infecting the group, which is typically just a small part of the tribe. If the whole village got sick, esp if they knew they would be meeting with other bands of their own tribe soon (or even other neighbors), they well may have gone into the water to protect the larger community. I always get choked up thinking of the two young native men here, who threw themselves off a cliff to avoid infecting others with smallpox, but I am.happy their sacrifice is remembered. Their tribe was very, very small then (northern cheyenne) & faced near extinction. Those boys may have truly saved their tribe.