The Verdict with Judge Glenda Hatchett: Mommy's Meltdown & Volunteer Violation

Подписаться 42 тыс.

Просмотров 6 тыс.

50% 1

An unexpected death leads to a dispute over unpaid rent; A man is injured at a dog shelter.
Welcome to Justice Central, the ultimate destination for your court TV cravings! ⚖️✨ Dive into the fascinating world of Justice with our lineup of nine incredible court TV shows. From dramatic rulings to heartfelt justice, we've got it all.
Justice Central lineup of Judges includes Supreme Justice with Judge Karen, America's Court with Judge Ross, Justice for the People with Judge Milian, We the People with Judge Lauren Lake, The Verdict with Judge Hatchett, Mathis Court with Judge Mathis, Equal Justice with Judge Eboni K Williams, Justice for All with Judge Cristina Perez, and Justice with Judge Mablean.
Don't miss a single case - find all of these captivating shows right here on Justice Central's RU-vid channel, as well as on The Grio and your local TV listings. Subscribe now to stay up-to-date with the latest courtroom drama and legal showdowns! Justice awaits ⚖️
Follow Justice Central across the web:
Instagram: /
Facebook: / justicecentraltv
TikTok: / justicecentral

Опубликовано:

27 сен 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 21

@lauralee60 5 месяцев назад

I would sue my friend too if I left them responsible for my property..yup 100% Especially when I give them explicit instructions not to let unstable people in

@Martha-zf7gv 5 месяцев назад

Judge is wrong. How dare you not Hold the defendant responsible.😢 How dare you

@lauralee60 5 месяцев назад

@@Martha-zf7gv yeah..I was so confused.I hope he holds her responsible for the damage

@JOSEPHwHAN 5 месяцев назад

Damn. He trusted his boy but his boy fell weak to puppy eyes..

@bonniecropper9915 5 месяцев назад

In that first case the best friend knew the situation and like the guy said he likes to stir up stuff and to me likes drama. He knew what she was capable of when he let her in. It's just crazy.

@puremotion2212 5 месяцев назад

Wow, how is it possible to trust a "friend" after she kisses your fiancé ?

@cheikhsarr5176 5 месяцев назад

The defendant is totally responsible for the fish tank damage. He is paid to watch over it. I don't agree with the judge's ruling.

@sherreefelstead4013 5 месяцев назад

Case #1: it saddens me when long-time friends end up in court. The plaintiff is making his bad behavior towards his girlfriend his friend's problem. For shame. Case #2: I think the plaintiff wanted to sabotage her friend's wedding and life out of jealousy or envy.

@karenoconnor4180 5 месяцев назад

I think a normal person would sue the person that actually destroyed the fish tank .. He would have 100% won his case if he’d have gone down that obvious route 🙄

@14kchang 5 месяцев назад

He was thinking with his hormones instead of his brain. He couldn't be bothered to pick up the phone to check in with his girlfriend and say what he was really doing.

@inutukawana7408 5 месяцев назад

First case, total toxicity. Why were they even together 🙄 kept calling her unstable.

@14kchang 5 месяцев назад

The judge is right in the first case: why would you want to be around a spoiled, unfaithful jerk as a friend? I don't think he deserves a good friend like the first defendant. His calm facade is just a facade. He's not the perfect gentleman he claims to be. There's a passion in his heart and like all uptight men, when he releases that pent-up passion, it's overwhelming. He's thinking, "Why can't my world be perfect the way I want it? Why doesn't it understand me? Why don't women want me?" Because I think ladies don't want him if he's a two-faced snake.

@twilderlm2559 5 месяцев назад

Judge shld've @ least got his 500 back

@aliciamackie5876 2 месяца назад

I disagree wholeheartedly with the first verdict.

@leonidasspyropoulos849 2 месяца назад

Sorry judge, with all due respect, the defendant Jacob Jakes if fully responsible. The terms were clear, do not let her in the house. He left her alone for a long time thinking this way he is avoiding responsibility. So immature, so disrespectful. She played him with fake tears and had her way. He is 100% liable for all the damages. The agreement was 500 dollars to not let her in the house. The plaintiff is such a good person. Apparently he cannot get rid of her so technically he is not cheating. Judge you let your emotion cloud your logic and you did wrong to a good person the plaintiff.

@colors5778 5 месяцев назад

He should have sued her she's the one that broke the fish tank smh he the one that drove her crazy cheating known knowing she have low self esteem that he caused so I don't feel sorry for him I hope Karma comes back and bite him🤦🏿‍♀️.😎

@twilderlm2559 5 месяцев назад

2nd sounds like Something Borrowed... but n the movie the wedding never happened / they got 2gether. That said... she kicked her friend out but kept dude who is untrustworthy. Dumb Dumb.

@krispricediy8421 5 месяцев назад

I believe she deserved her money back in the 2nd case. If you forgave your now husband enough to still marry him. He was there for the kiss too and did not tell you. He wasn’t banned from the wedding but she was. So she should’ve gotten her money back. To condemn her alone & not him is ridiculous.

@twilderlm2559 5 месяцев назад

Agree