I always say, flawless Roger Federer is the best version of tennis player ever. Novak Djokovic maintained high level due to his unerring habits but Federer with all guns firing is just the bestest in the universe.
That was ridiculous! Very Best Regards, Tom Scott Author ● Speaker ● World's Leading Expert on the Corrupt U.S. Legal System _Our American Injustice System_ _Stack the Legal Odds in Your Favor_
The prime of mister 40-15 ended when Nadal and Djokovic started beating him. Mr 40-15 didn't actually start weakening but two rivals appeared who simply started beating him.
That's why they slowing courts in important tournaments. Federer was invincible in fast surfaces. this is the perfect example! peak Djokovic couldn't do anything against 34 years old grandpa
@@earl8295 but the court in ao 2016 where djokovic beat roger was equally faster as dubai's court in 2015. And if you wanna bring roger's victory over djokovic in 2007 ao, let's also remember that djokovic beat roger on that tournament in 2008, 2011, 2016 and 2020
@@gamejester. Im using the same source that everyone uses (including you) to measure the speed of a tennis court (since court pace rating info is not avaliable). My eyes. Ao 2016 and Ao 2017 were playing practicly the same speed. No big changes at all
This is just a tease of how good can Federer performance in such a fast court. Shame on ATP they slowed down all courts in the whole tour last 20 years.
Considering performance and H2H stats Novak and Nadal are in front of Roger. N and N are very strong, powerful machines. Roger, on the other hand is graceful and i think technically more perfect than any other player so far. Wonder why they call him The Maestro ? He can hit almost any shot from any position. And look very relaxed in the meantime. Being The GOAT is a matter of statistics. But the way one is doing it, might be more important.
naive people from Novak fans only care about slam numbers and h2h, they dont know how to dive deeper in statistics. Roger and Rafa both have their unique playing styles like on grass and clay, Novak doesnt since he's just relying on physical (rallying as long as I could), no one wants to watch that. People prefer unexpected shots like how Roger plays his game.
@@earl8295 im not a djokovic fan but let me remind you that 10 years ago when roger and rafa lead the big titles race and overall records, fans use to bring up the slams, h2h and weeks at #1 to say either roger or rafa were the goats. Now that djokovic have surpassed them, the narrative has changed hipocritically. Plus. If there's any playstyle that relys on physicality mostly, is nadal's.
Roger was just unlucky that it was Novak's comeback prime in 2015. But he beat Novak on several occasions too and that was not Roger's prime including the iconic french open 2011 SF, novak had 4 days off lol.
Novak is the strongest ever.Roger is the greatest.Nobody has been the world no.1 for 273?consecutive weeks.Roger was pretty much always loved.His game is elegant and entertaining than Novak's.Novak has better records by numbers,has more slams,but also has a lot of numbers for destroying rackets.😂
10 years ago, most of the fans called roger the greatest for his achievements and records. I bet that you were in that high percentage of fans so please have some dignity and acknowledge that roger is not the greatest anymore
@@user-eh1vv2fd9c ah ok, sorry. Just remember that the most loved player, the most gifted or the most intense one is not necesarily the greatest. The greatest is determined by the records which are facts
@@victormanuelbustamantealva6803 most loved?😂you make me laugh.and by the way I never said Novak was worse or anything.Novak is better than Roger by the numbers.He beat Roger more times than Roger did.But he wasn't the man who changed tennis.Doesn't have the style,the elegance that suits "The Greatest" spot.Novak is The Strongest for me.Not the greatest.The scariest is Nadal btw.Greatest PRIME player is Novak.
Fed faded after novak/nadal got going he didn't evolve his sqaush game and when u watch fed he didn't think when he played..Seems his mind was on his pagaentry status with all the armchair tennis fans drinking the marketing koolaid
roger is over rated he got the goldilocks era 2003-2009 after when nadal/djoki got going Feds sqaush game wilted just like his weak backhand and weak mental strength..Fedsqaush only won 33% of his GS matches agaisnt nadal/djoki and SAme in GS finals only winning 33% again his 2 rivals novak/nadal..Fed couldn't even beat nadal once at french and lossed to joki 3 times in a row at Wimbledon fianls on his supposed BEST SURFACE!!?? 50% of fedsqaush titles were on the B circuit 250/500..Fed did sell more running shoes
