Тёмный

The Weirdly Massive Firetrap Bomber That Terrified Everyone 

Only Planes
Подписаться 10 тыс.
Просмотров 92 тыс.
50% 1

The Luftwaffe faced a critical problem. Building a strategic bomber capable of penetrating deep into the Soviet Union required engines with at least 2,000 horsepower-an unheard-of feat at the time.
In a daring gamble, Heinkel Flugzeugwerke took a colossal risk. They fused two Daimler-Benz DB 601 engines, creating the monstrous Daimler-Benz DB 606 power system. With these twin powerhouses, they crafted the Heinkel He 177 Greif, effectively one of Germany’s first four-engine bombers.
The result was revolutionary: a massive warbird capable of reaching 565 kilometers per hour, outrunning many contemporary bombers and boasting an exceptional range of up to 6,500 kilometers. Armed to the teeth with 7.92 millimeter MG 81 machine guns and a 20 millimeter MG 151 cannon, it provided robust defense against enemy fighters. It could carry up to 6,000 kilograms of bombs, including Germany’s heaviest aerial ordnance and guided missiles like the Fritz X.
This innovative engine configuration proved to be its Achilles’ heel. The He 177’s engines were prone to overheating and catching fire, leading to a series of catastrophic incidents. Crews soon nicknamed it “The Flaming Coffin,” “One Way Bomber,” or “Volcano.” Even Hitler and Goering despised the warplane.
Despite its flaws, the He 177 remained Germany’s only long-range heavy bomber. Against all odds, brave pilots pushed the flaming coffin to its limits, determined to transform it into a weapon that could change the course of the war.

Наука

Опубликовано:

 

7 июл 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 49   
@csjrogerson2377
@csjrogerson2377 18 дней назад
As an ex military man involved in procurement for the last 7 years, the Requirement to produce a twin engines bomber with engines of at least 2000 hp, was seriously flawed. That is a solution, not a requirement. The Requirement is to go W kms, at X speed, at Y altitude and carry Z amount of bombs. Aeronautical engineering and design will tell you what size plane you need, what power from and number of engines you will need, how much fuel will need to be carried to move Z amount of bombs. If you dont have the equipment to meet that technical solution, you either design them or change the Requirement.
@myplane150
@myplane150 21 день назад
I realize the Greif was not a good aircraft but, damn, it was a really good looking aircraft. Wow, they sure could have used the late model version in 1941/42. Who knows how it would have gone in the East with this in your arsenal?☺
@garyhooper1820
@garyhooper1820 20 дней назад
It would have suffered great losses , Germans never had a long range fighter to match defense fighters , And we know how that worked out for U.S. heavy long range missions without escorts
@streamofconsciousness5826
@streamofconsciousness5826 20 дней назад
I think two engines in line with a contarotainting props was the way to go if they wanted to have less drag by reducing the number of engine mounts. Goering was right this time, welding two engines together was a bad idea and should have been dropped as soon as they noticed the inside exhausts were not working properly and flooding with flammables. I am guessing they could not mount them bottom to bottom because the gear that combined the two would need to be that much bigger to span the extra few feet, and weigh that much more. Another Vunder Vepon that thankfully helped them lose the war. I was surprised the program was started in 36, I thought the He177 was a late war weapon.
@billballbuster7186
@billballbuster7186 20 дней назад
No matter how advanced and well engineered it was, the He177 was a poor strategic bomber of limited value. Were the British built three very good strategic bombers, the Germans lost interest in building a bomber that actually worked, which was to greatly affected their war effort. Like many German projects, it was too advanced for the technology of the day and was an expensive flop. It would have been better to build a more reliable 4-engine design, with coupled engines if one goes down the other quickly followed.
@sullivanrachael
@sullivanrachael 16 дней назад
The Germans lacked the fuel to sustain huge fleets of strategic bombers. Plus our losses were at times unsustainable. The Germans had other means of dealing with us - U boat campaign to starve us and limit our imports of material. The Germans always suffered from a lack of strategic materials and frequently over engineered the solutions to handle those problems, often creating imaginative machines which still fascinate us.
@bassbustingman
@bassbustingman 17 дней назад
Imagine if they just made it into a normal 4 engine bomber, like the start of the Lancaster
@bernienicholson9582
@bernienicholson9582 15 дней назад
The development of the Lancaster had Exactly the same Problems with the Engines Catching Fire, for the same reasons they cobbled together two engines it was a disaster! GOOGLE the AVRO MANCHESTER, after Building around 200 of them they Kept the Fuselage and Fitted New Wings and four Separate Engines and re-Named it the LANCASTER
@oxcart4172
@oxcart4172 17 дней назад
Good god. I've never seen a colour picture of a '177 before
@chrismayer3919
@chrismayer3919 3 дня назад
Every aircraft has its own unique merits and flaws…
@stevencarlson7853
@stevencarlson7853 18 дней назад
Very well done presentation
@EllieMaes-Grandad
@EllieMaes-Grandad 12 дней назад
Alas, no. Too many repetitions spoil it. It's badly planned and poorly edited. Interesting material, but . . .
@salvagedb2470
@salvagedb2470 20 дней назад
The Two engine Coupling was a Bad idea , it was the German trait of Over engineering , it would have done Better on 4 Bolt on bolt off Engines ..Just think how long did it take U.S mechanics take to change a B17 / 24 Engine ? , far far less than this Nightmare . I luv the He177 it could have been better but the Germans just could not get the Mix right ..Good Vid.
@finncarlbomholtsrensen1188
@finncarlbomholtsrensen1188 16 дней назад
It didn't just fly from bombers, but also the contemporary fighters, so it didn't need much armament by that. And the cooling was surface cooling with water below the plates of the wings, making it even more fast than having an ordinary cooler! Sadly this made the plates change from the difference in temperature, and didn't really function.
@badmutherfunster
@badmutherfunster 19 дней назад
Didn't help by insisting that it should be able to dive bomb to. Interesting review on this plane by the Legend Eric "winkle" Brown
@ArthurShelby481
@ArthurShelby481 17 дней назад
The Nazi party loved a show. They loved seeing 20, 30 40 x2 engined bombers flying in formation even if they were not as effective as a 4 engined heavy bomber. All about show sometimes with the Nazis.
@aleccrombie7923
@aleccrombie7923 18 дней назад
The flaming coffin! Trust the ordinary serving soldier to accurately find a sarcastic name for a poor machine.
@squiremc
@squiremc 17 дней назад
During WW1 the allied RE8 two seat fighter had the epic nickname of ''The Spinning Incinerator.'' It was a dreadfully stall prone aircraft that came with strict instructions for the gunner/observer to NEVER stand up during landing to look over the upper wing as the ''head resistance'' would cause a stall and crash. These names give an excellent basis for assessing how the crews viewed these aircraft and a respect for the crews that still flew and fought in them.
@eisenkopf69
@eisenkopf69 16 дней назад
Until today I only knew 'Flying lighter' as her nickname. This film is really well made, audio, video and content wise.
@bwilliams463
@bwilliams463 18 дней назад
I can't fathom using an aircraft that big for dive-bombing, especially if the mission parameters included the actual return of the plane from its mission.
@michaelkroger899
@michaelkroger899 19 дней назад
at least build a normal 4 engine the he 277 this one works very well...dont forget he 177 can dive bomb...
@JSFGuy
@JSFGuy 21 день назад
No notice, let's check it out.
@jorgegallo3261
@jorgegallo3261 17 дней назад
Germany lacked a heavy bomber for the Battle of Britain, like the Lancaster 4-engine..
@oxcart4172
@oxcart4172 17 дней назад
That didn't fly until about a year later
@bernienicholson9582
@bernienicholson9582 15 дней назад
The Lancaster Started off as the AVRO MANCHESTER with 4 Engines cobbled together in 2 Nacelles it was a disaster with VERY poor reliability and the propensity to CATCH fire , after building around 200 , they realized the error and kept the fuselage , Fitted New wings with 4 separate Engines and re-named it the AVRO LANCASTER !
@Pavlovshouse-ud5ek
@Pavlovshouse-ud5ek 17 дней назад
What happened to the FW200 condor?
@smythharris2635
@smythharris2635 12 дней назад
It kept breaking in half, when it wasn't being shot down by Eric Winkle Brown and his pals😅
@CHEGTO
@CHEGTO 12 дней назад
There also wasn’t many of them made that could be converted to military use . They did make a couple handfuls of an upgrade or modified version called the ju390 and ju290. But dwindling material resources the shortage of fuel and the turn in the tied of war caused those projects to be abandoned I believe the us the uk and maybe Romania all got one of those planes. The us one was flown to America. Flight tested studied then scrapped 😢
@Pavlovshouse-ud5ek
@Pavlovshouse-ud5ek 12 дней назад
@@CHEGTO thank you.
@kimeldiin1930
@kimeldiin1930 16 дней назад
NEVER WELDED TOGETHER!! But rather "Siamesed".
@lewissparrow7417
@lewissparrow7417 16 дней назад
I think the designers were trying to be too clever coupling two engines to a single propeller. Once they sorted out all the technical problems that they had it turned out to be an okay aircraft but by then it was hampered by fuel shortages and Allied defences. It would have been quite useful on the Russian front ranging behind enemy lines to bomb distant war factories that were well and truly out of range of other Luftwaffe bombers.
@JeffreyWilliams-dr7qe
@JeffreyWilliams-dr7qe 2 дня назад
Three very good British what? Intrigued here.
@oxcart4172
@oxcart4172 17 дней назад
13:43 that looks an awful lot like Joe Smith, who took over the development of the Spitfire after R.J. Mitchell died
@robirobinson9426
@robirobinson9426 18 дней назад
Led Designer or "Leed" Designer. I hate uncorrected/unedited auto-readers.
@annoyingbstard9407
@annoyingbstard9407 19 дней назад
Generally if a plane looks like a pile of junk, it’ll be a pile of junk. This looks like a pile of junk.
@davefellhoelter1343
@davefellhoelter1343 18 дней назад
or a changed plan?
@JosephPercente
@JosephPercente 5 дней назад
Didn't last long. Mothballed because of fuel shortages in 44.
@Happy11807
@Happy11807 18 дней назад
The. Brits found out how USELESS 7.62 machines guns were for fighter defense! The 20 was just as limited for tail defense !
@The67wheelman
@The67wheelman 3 дня назад
Germanys whole war plan works great on small European countries but falls apart as the distance increases. They were ahead of their time in equipment and behind the times with their logistics and an army marches on its stomach. Had the German war machine been lead by men hired by their abilities not social standing or ideological beliefs the war would have been a very different outcome I mean they hobbled Rommel to build defensives and then ignore is advice. Just dumb. Had they listened to Rommel we would have faced masses of tank formations on the beaches. Lucky for us mind you…
@kimeldiin1930
@kimeldiin1930 16 дней назад
FOR CRYING OUT LOUD : THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A DB605 S !!!!THE "S" IS A PLURAL !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@gregmacdonald7710
@gregmacdonald7710 12 дней назад
Mate, you weren't under the duress of WW2!😡
@jamesburnett7085
@jamesburnett7085 18 дней назад
Terribly written
@davegarfield9007
@davegarfield9007 17 дней назад
*LOSE THE ROBO-‘NOUNCER!*
@raywest3834
@raywest3834 18 дней назад
Ah! The Junkers Jew 288. 😂
@bullettube9863
@bullettube9863 17 дней назад
The fact that Britain and America both produced four engine bombers that were just as powerful but simpler and cheaper to produce and fly proves that the Germans were crappy engineers. America built 18,000 B-24s that pounded German cities into dust and destroyed German factories and infrastructure, while Germany built rockets that regularly missed their targets. The Russians moved their factories out of range of the bombers they knew the Germans had and thus survived to win the war with their cheap tanks and aircraft. Luckily the Germans never realized just how important strategic bombing could be.
@marchills4131
@marchills4131 15 дней назад
The Germans have been accused of a lot of things by historians who analyze the reasons they ultimately failed in their efforts to prevail in WW2. Crappy engineers has never one of them. Over engineering in things like the StG 44 assault rifle and their Panther and Tiger tanks, I've heard of. Crappy engineering is a new one to me.
@bullettube9863
@bullettube9863 15 дней назад
@@marchills4131 When engineers do not take into account practicality and ease of production then they are crappy engineers.
@Smaragdschloss
@Smaragdschloss 3 дня назад
Ever heard of sabotage? We lost the war that was staged by the Allies and violated international law because of sabotage and betrayal from within our own ranks. The traitors were in the most important positions and informed the enemy about every German move and every new invention for selfish reasons and total political blindness. Without the theft of German patents and the kidnapping of German scientists, the US and the Soviet Union would never have become 'great powers'. And without the illegal FED, the war opponents would not even have been able to buy enough weapons for the war. The USA owes everything it is today to the Germans. The majority of Americans are even of German descent. You're "crappy" in the head!
Далее
Me264 "Uberfortress"
11:13
Просмотров 173 тыс.
The Truth About the Memphis Belle (No Hollywood)
49:45
Hiroshima - the unknown images
52:01
Просмотров 6 млн
He 219 Uhu: The Eagle Owl Night Fighter
13:55
Просмотров 88 тыс.
The Biggest Cannons Mounted On Aircraft In WW2
21:12
Просмотров 48 тыс.
MiG-25 - the king of interceptors
44:00
Просмотров 527 тыс.
Crazy Roman Military Tactics That Actually Worked
9:22