The WORST thing I've done to my 911 Turbo S! 

They do have friends and families that they gotta get back home to, you know😅

I think with more weight in the back seat and no one in the front passenger seat, the 0-60 will be quicker than with only the driver

I think the conclusion would be what you think it would be. adding weight to rear will improve 0-60 slightly and adding 150kg to the front only will hurt 0-60 slighlty. but adding weight anywhere will hurt the quarter mile time either way

@@justinbocchino5141 yes we do have a general and probably fairly accurate idea of how things would go but we'd be able to quantify that gap

@@justinbocchino5141 i dont think adding weight will improve the speed since the turbo s dont really need any weight to grip better

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-VxPOhg-6WEI.html

and in decades you still won't be able to afford it, fanboy 😅

@@mmmdawe Mateusz W, i belive adding weight only lose 7bhp to the 911 TURBO S. The 911 Turbo S has 591PP. With adding weight, it brought down to 590.

@@mmmdawe nah it will definitely become cheaper in a few years

Best lanching car of the early 2020s...

The car seems to stood the test of everything.

it's just wrong. it gets 33.5 imperial mpg which is 8.5L/100km. their conversion is with US gallons

It’s not a supercar

@@JStryker7 it just is

@@JStryker7 it smokes 90% of real supercars on all aspects, so it's definitely a supercar.

The test lack the urban cycle test, aka, stop go for at least 7 minutes and freeway cruise for another 7 minutes... This will be a better representation for fuel consumption.

@@thabzmad7265 adding weight only deducts 1 PP to the 911 TURBO S.

It's only a 9% increase in weight.

Wow, thanks for doing the conversion! 🙄🤦‍♂️

I'm more shocked that adding passengers makes the 0-60 quicker even though the car is AWD...the only explanation I can see is the AWD system is not properly tuned and doesn't know how to take advantage of the front grip as well as the rear grip. more weight cant improve acceleration unless it's more weight on driven wheels. let's say on a RWD , you add 10% of the total weight, but in the back m, resulting in 15% more weight on the rear wheels m, 15% more grip/wheel torque actually transfered to the road. but if AWD is properly implemented, AWD should always be quicker with less weight. I don't know how the torque is actually split, I've read that the torque split is continuously adjusted but even weirder, I'd expect the launch control to be more optimized for 2 people than 4. how often are you likely to drive your turbo S with 4 adults inside, and use launch control?? good thing is that it means there are still small improvements/performance gains to be made on the next gen. otherwise it's getting so close to perfect supercar+daily driver. it feels like hybridization/electrification will come at a good time when they have almost exhausted what they can do with the traditional design gas 911. pdk is already close to as good as it gets. straight line performance is insane. how far can you go with wheel size before it stops looking like a 911 or even a sports car I would have loved to see a lightweight non hybrid 911 with a boxer free valve engine. of you put 2 Koenigsegg TFG 2l inline 3 together, you have a stock 4l flat 6 1200hp engine, up to 1200Nm from 2000rpm or a even 600hp NA GT3 RS with turbos they could still donwsize to 3.0l ...and also WAY better mileage/emissions

Gets better economy than my Lexus that has less than half the power, truly impressive

@@talltrini10 Keep in mind that resetting the MPG tracker while moving at freeway speeds is considered "cheating". I do it all the time for the short term satisfaction in my RC after filling up, and it will inevitably settle down to around 20-22

@@talltrini10 fuel economy isn't based on power its based on wind resistance, rolling resistance and weight in stop-start traffic

There's a question mark like a lot of their videos

Yes. For some reason they converted using US MPG instead of imperial MPG. Maybe Porsche uses that? Didn't notice any mention of it but meh.

i like how none of those is helpful to me. what's that in km/l? i guess around 12 which is bonkers since my car only does like 9 @ 120kph

@@GraveUypo it's 8.5l/100km.

@@GraveUypo Why do you use km/l? I'm curious

@@anonym3017 such a shame. My car gets 4 l /100 km.

there is another video with a cheap underpowered three row Dacia with up to 7 passengers.

Check out the same test done on the Dacia Jogger 1.0

@@thabihotboy9376 yep. I already saw it. Hope carwow also uploaded the one with Nissan R33GT-R.

*under the boot

Yes, the 911 has a ton of power and inherently great weight distribution for acceleration, but also and a very powerful and well-tuned active suspension system

Tires are the single biggest difference you can make to any cars performance, certainly not trivial

Would be interesting to see the same tests, but what's happening when you change tires pressure, i.e. from 1.8 Bar to 2.8 Bar every 0.2 Bar or something similar and see how that affects 0-60, 60-0, fuel economy, etc.

@@povilasrikteris what about increasing the downforce on both sides?

@@yeahitskimmel increasing downforce by 4 percent on both sides may do the trick.

Is there anything you don't love about these videos!?!!! If Mat was having a shit would you love that?

scientific? 🤣

It's far from scientific. Way too many uncontrolled variables and not enough trials. Still an entertaining video though.

I had a 180 bhp glanza v years ago. With 5 in it a 2 litre diesel would pull on you!

and this technological marvel has broken rear lights 0:37

@@ilyakhlybov6446 Broken? they work just fine lmao

@@ilyakhlybov6446 I think youre talking about the split light in the rear light bar? Thats not broken, thats just split in the middle because of UK car regulations.

@@diggernick8628 the spot in the middle isn't bright

@@diggernick8628 damn

You old smoothie you…

That fuel economy is wrong. Matt used conversion from US mpg, not imperial. Correct amount would be 8.38 l/100. Still very impressive for such powerful car.

@@oskarskalski2982as you said still good fuel economy. From a 650hp car !!!!!

Imperial gallon UK = 4.546 L. US gallon = 3.785 L

@@MrCosmin94 👍👍👍

@@JonBecker81 Japanese Galloon: 5555L?

Brakes goddammit

What about a test on R390GT1?

Practical but expensive. $300,000 Plus in the US right now.

@@georgespalding7640 6+ months wanting period!!

@@georgespalding7640 2023 may reach $500000.

@@rohitbishoyi1095 more like 17.

@@rohitbishoyi1095 I don't think you can even order one now. Porsche is sending just so many to each dealership and when they're just about to get to the dealership they go up for bids. There are NO new 911 Turbos at any dealership in California on display. I did a search the other day and could not find one dealership with one on the floor. It just said here's two that's on the way and dealer will set the price.

I was gonna say this test only works for a porsche, especially the braking side of things😂

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-VxPOhg-6WEI.html

Porsche and LoveLive fan here.

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-VxPOhg-6WEI.html

How do I get the prize

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-VxPOhg-6WEI.html

Hang in there mate

@@yuckf0094 Its crazy bro, really dead ass crazy and it's been for ages...at least if I'm getting glimpses of great things for I to believe the is good for me in earth...and I love , respect people I don't do bad towards them but I always get crushed. God is quiet!

Huh?

Yep. Add also on both downforces by 6 percent.

how are you getting better fuel economy in a Cayenne, what speed were you going at?

The limiting factor is almost always the grip. Most (all?) cars have much more brake power than grip (tires...).

@@edimbukvarevic90 Correct. The added mass increases the amount of dissipated energy though. Therefore, it decreases endurance and longevity of the brakes.

@@MartinBrada yes, brake overheating and fade too, but the subject here is strictly braking distance with sufficiently cold brakes.

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-VxPOhg-6WEI.html

he have older modle

There’s more to it than surface conditions. How about air temp, how much fuel was in the car? Is Matts car a different spec with extras that weigh a bit more…. So many variables, but the difference is only a blink of an eye.

BTW, it had never done 2.1,the fastest time it did to 100 was 2.5 And the reason for the decrease is probably the fact that it's a press car and it has undergone some tough use before it was handed to Matt and also the tires are probably used a lot. So you can understand why it is slower.

@@abderrahmanelbakkali190 This is his personal car

👍

He he he he!!

What about a test on power limiter? Might be interesting if 911 has a 50 percent power limit.

Tik Tok is literally cancer. The Chinese government created it. In china it’s all educational videos and you can access it after 10pm. The rest of the world it’s created to dumb the world down with utter crap. Very clever from china

You didnt sub me

💀💀💀🌹💣👊

I dont even have instagram

@@vojinvujadinovic4184 why?

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-VxPOhg-6WEI.html

Oh oooooooo ohhh 😎🤣😆😂😂 he is embarresd Coz he was thinking of how can I fit in this small car😎🤣🤣🔫✅

@Eight8 strong as 5 kg with harsd skin

Why do I keep on getting adverts when I do a comment on your channel?