@adamrahman6015 are you incapable of reading? I said that there was a 369-day span where Roman only defended it 3 times on TV (making an average of 1 defense per 123 days). That is a fact that can't be argued. Also I don't know why you bring up cody when his reign just started and has defended it more on average than Roman's entire reign. Cody; 1 defense per 30 days on average. Roman 1 defense per 39.878787... days on average (edit: correction Roman had 1 defense per 41.125 days on average I accidentally counted him winning against the fiend and Braun as a title defense)
Roman only became a part timer in his final year after he had already fought everyone 2 or 3 times lol. If he kept the same frequency, then everyone would be complaining about having to watch Roman Vs Kevin Owens for the 12th time. The same way people complained about watching Cena Vs Orton a thousand times. For reference, Roman had 31 total title defenses in his 1316 days as champion. That's a title defense every month and a half (43 days AKA 6 weeks). That's a pretty good rate IMO. Sure, I think he should've appeared more on smackdown during the build to Mania, but Roman being a "part timer who rarely defended his title" was definitely overblown.
Ever since he became the megastar LA Knight did something iconic in every feud he had: - Got dressed as Bray Wyatt with a mini lamp, -Skip through Roman Reign's long ass entrance -Got arrested for trying to invade AJ Styles house. I really thing a feud with Logan Paul is gonna be fire, WWE better do it.
I don't know what's the problem with Logan as champion tbh, he is one of the most entertaining parts of the show whenever he appears and I very much rather have him appear half the time other full time champions do knowing I'll be emtertained every time he does, which is something I cannot say about many full time champions currently
I feel wrestling is past the era judging how good a title reign is by how many title defences they've had per number of days as champion or whatever. Seth Rollins defended his WHC title many times but how many of those times can we remember, also everyone can always tell the time period when a champ is going to lose his title these days so continously fighting predictable matches that everyone knows you'd retain anyway Is kinda useless.. At this point it's quality over quantity for me.
Yeah bro he needs to drop the title or defend it more. 200 days with only 2 defenses is disgusting especially when you consider the long history of men who have held that title and what they had to do to make it mean something in the sport
They probably still let him keep the belt cuz it's made WWE more relevant on social media. Yeah, he doesn't deserve to hold it that long, but it's good for business I guess.
In the old days they had a 30day rule on title defenses. So strip him and have a tournament at a ple 8 super stars that could be 8 killer matches maybe with pre qualifies on smackdown with a leathol lottery dray for the qualifies
Ok i gotta give him credit that for a non wrestler he can actually wrestle but we don't need part time Champs! Everyone knows the only reason he's holding the belt is due to the Prime logo in the centre of the ring! It's time for a new real full time champ #YEAH
Paul has been working his butt off and putting on many great performances despite being a part-timer. I remember more of his spots than Roman's. Also, LA Knight's 'yeah' sounds more like Flair in that take.
Tbh I think he’s a bit better of a champ than Roman cause he don’t need a melting hippo to talk for him and he don’t need a whole group to make sure he wins all he needs is the brass knuckles
Thing is Logan has been around having matches so why not? He should have lost it at Mania to KO. Then his match with Cody would have made so much more sense.
I’ve actually liked Logan Paul’s reign. Unlike the other longer non-defendy reigns the WWE has put on, Logan does great work on the mic and is a very entertaining heel. Roman’s reign was amazing when the Bloodline was at its peak, but it ran its course after a while, especially when the Bloodline started sucking once Jey left and Jimmy stopped doing stuff. Now that bum ass Solo is “in charge” the Bloodline is rapidly dying
Ironically He calls himself as the Greatest United States Champion of all time🤢 In reality He's not even dust of Cena's shoe during that 2015 us title run
I mean for me i dont need to see logan consistently defend it, i dont have a problem with him being champion, i actually think hes been a pretty solid champion, way better than austin theory was to me. I just see it as logan is probably the most relevant guy to hold that belt in a long time and him holding it i only really see as good for wwe. He has had it for a while so it is getting close to that time he should lose it but i haven't been here hating logans run with it at all
