Тёмный

The Young Wittgenstein 

Forum for Philosophy
Подписаться 6 тыс.
Просмотров 9 тыс.
50% 1

One of the twentieth century’s greatest philosophers, Wittgenstein published only one book. To celebrate its centenary, we revisit 'Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus'. An unusual work of philosophy by any standard, it was written on the front lines during World War I and purported to distinguish sense from nonsense. Wittgenstein felt that in the Tractatus he had solved all the problems of philosophy. Appropriately, once finished writing the book, he abandoned philosophy, only returning years later to focus on ordinary language and its philosophical potential. In this panel, we take a look back at the man, his early life and work, and consider why his thinking has been of such enduring interest.
In association with the Royal Institute of Philosophy
SPEAKERS
*Ian Ground*
Visiting Research Fellow in Philosophy, University of Hertfordshire
Vice-President, The British Wittgenstein Society
*Stephen Mulhall*
Professor of Philosophy, University of Oxford
*Chon Tejedor*
Associate Professor of Philosophy, University of Valencia
Senior Lecturer in Philosophy, University of Hertfordshire
CHAIR
*Clare Moriarty*
Fellow, The Forum
Recorded on 7 February 2018 at the Royal Institute of Philosophy by @KyleCruiseVideo
More information:
www.philosophy-...

Опубликовано:

 

4 окт 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 8   
@Dystisis
@Dystisis 5 лет назад
Stephen Mulhall ( 33:38 ) is brilliantly clear. Perhaps the best explanation of the Tractatus in video-format. He summarises without falsely simplifying or obscuring, which in the case of this book is painstakingly difficult.
@windokeluanda
@windokeluanda 9 месяцев назад
So beautifu❤l. I had a tear of two after this talk. Thank you for sharing it. Congratulations to all the team including the speakers of course.
@ayushisharma162
@ayushisharma162 2 месяца назад
Thank you. Thank you.
@karelfrielink4300
@karelfrielink4300 Месяц назад
In my view, the Wittgenstein of the Tractatus rightly came to the insight that if we are to talk meaningfully (in a scientific sense) about reality (the world around us), the language we use must have the same inner logical coherence as the world we are describing. The fact that all kinds of topics can be talked about meaningfully in addition, as his Investigations show, does not take away the value of the insight he gained earlier. In this sense, I see Wittgenstein II as a complement to Wittgenstein I.
@paulohara8967
@paulohara8967 5 лет назад
This picking apart of language seems to be about as far away from the Continental approach as you could find. Apparently all metaphysical systems are the same, in the sense that they all come under the general umbrella of what is nonsensical. In the case of ethics what he seems to be be saying is that only relative judgements can make sense.
@DeadEndFrog
@DeadEndFrog 2 года назад
Im not sure what the word 'absolute' in absolute value is supposed to signify here, we can't talk about it, we shouldn't talk about it ect. Why assert 'absolute' value? Because of intuition? Because we do apriori? Since when has that ever stopped philosophy before.
Далее
Strong Feelings
1:27:03
Просмотров 832
When Goalkeepers Get Bored 🤯 #3
00:27
Просмотров 3 млн
Wittgenstein's Games by A. C. Grayling
1:01:26
Просмотров 56 тыс.
Wittgenstein's Tractatus
49:56
Просмотров 94 тыс.
Wittgenstein's Games (A. C. Grayling)
56:18
Просмотров 15 тыс.