Theory of Evolution: How did Darwin come up with it? - BBC News 

Rick Sanchez I agree with you man

Sadly still cannot explain anything about: 1) The missing link of Hominization. 2) Large dark eyes on apes become large white eyes on human. 3) Small brain on apes become big brain on human. Many more. The funny thing, this evolution theory should explain about the "evoution", instead just showing the "revolution theory".

@@nobodyjustme7481 stop being wilfully blind and study the subject, cause you're just making a fool out of yourself. This is not a contest but a search for actual truth so if you are going to throw around theories that have long been proven to be wrong just go to a little brain dead section of the internet and spread around your propaganda there

@@MrFlexNC You didn't answer my comment and just blabering, talking nonsense like a kid. 1) Where is the missing link between Lucy and Human? 2) How large dark eyes on apes suddenly become large white eyes on Lucy? 3) How small brain on apes suddenly changed become big brain on human? If you can found Lucy's fossil, you should found thousands fossil of the next missing link between Lucy and homo sapiens. Not only thousands, even millions fossil of missing link should be found, because the number of human colonies should growing and keep growing, from hundreds to thousands in decades, from thousands to millions in centuries, and from millions to billions in millenniums. But yet until now, no one could show any single one of missing link. The funny thing, there are only 40 tiny fragment of bones (less than 15% of bone structure) from Lucy's fossil that had been found. This means, more than 85% of Lucy's bone structures are only "imagination" patches. So, there is no any evidence, the evolution theory is absolute flaw, and Lucy just an apes.

periodtt

Betul2

You should also read Quran to know the truth

@@md.fahimfaysalasif4493 Can the Quran teach me how to edit videos like this?

@@md.fahimfaysalasif4493 We speak facts here, not fairytales

Bagi aku teori darwin ni mungkin btl. Tp bukan pd permulaannya kita monyet. Cube fikir blk kite ni sbg manusia. Sifat ingin tahu dn xpernah bersyukur. Diciptakn adam dn hawa dgn cukup sempurna. Tp disebbkn sifat ingin tahu dn xbersyukur ape yg diberikan. Kemungkinan besar slh satu keturunan kite tlh mengcantumkn benih manusia dgn monyet(phm2 jela maksudnye) Utk tujuan mencapai tahap spt monyet. Sbb ini la dahulu terlahirnye manusia baru.dn mungkin sbb ini la jgk adenye manusia berupe monyet spt sejarah2 kuno ceritekn. Malah manusia baru ni suke memburu manusia lain. Dn terhapuslah manusia2 yg sebenar. Kisah manusia baru nipun ade dlm sains yg ditemui.mungkin msh ade sisa2 manusia yg tulen mase 2.tp lupe ke kite. Pernah terjadinye banjir besar yg menenggelamkn bumi? Jd, ape yg tertinggal cume keturunan nabi nuh..bagi aku manusia 2 sempurna dh Allah ciptakn.cume kite ni xpernah bersyukur.kenape xdiceritekn dlm al-quran.?sbg manusie. Dpt ke kau trime kenyataan ni.?senang cite kau sanggup ke ngaku monyet 2 sedare kau?sedangkn Allah dh ciptekn manusia 2 sebaik2nye dn kite suke hati nk mengubahnye.sbb 2 jgk la peradaban manusia dulu kite lihat mempunyai teknologi canggih.ini sekadar teori aku dr melihat2 sejarah2 dr sains. Tp Allah lebih mengetahui.

Yeeee

Mr. Singh, I am sure you are aware, that God created man in his own image, that we were created to worship God, that it is because of sin, we are condemn to die, that we continue to sin daily and ultimately we must give an account for our sins. The criminal code defines conducts and degrees of punishments, likewise the bible shows us the need for a saviour and redemption from sin.

why did you write "i sees" instead of "i see'' ? thank you.

@@DarioDew Thank you, Mr.Grammarly.

@@MrSingh-fu6dz I didn't mean to offend you. I just asked.

Scientist have made a new discovery! Smartphones evolved from toasters, which evolved from screws, which were created by Iron molecules 1 billion years ago.

@@outofthebox9699 News flash. Scientists discover that manufactured products from assembled parts in no way resembles biological reproduction and evolution.

They showed you adaptability and mutation and like a clever magician they made you believe in evolution

@@Krishnas_flute Ah, you mean the basic elements of evolution- for which there is no obstacle.

​@@outofthebox9699you are obviously a Muslim😂

lol its funny u said that!! cause i got a big one!!

Prophecy is unfolding, men's hearts are becoming colder because of unbelief, the Mark of he Beast is ahead, Satan is the father of lies and the god(small "g") of the world. We are in the end times, many people have been receiving the Holy Ghost with the supernatural evidence of speakin in tongues, they that truly believe can receive it.

@@rawlity7869 ahhahah bullshit

@@rawlity7869 blah, blah, blah, blah

@@rawlity7869 grow up

@@Amen.ahmed1 1 Corinthians 13:11 KJV "When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish things."

Damn I was looking for exactly the same thing

Dam😂😂😂

@Al Mudarabah Nah Jesus is God

@Al Mudarabah Give me a break

I just want to know what app is she using.I want to use it for my class presentation.

Darwin was an agnostic.

Sexist to assume this was a "guy"!

@@dereksimmons1252 guy is gender neutral

@@dereksimmons1252 god, I don't even know who you are yet I already don't like you. smh

@@dereksimmons1252 spoilded brat alert , go in the description then reply

team*

BBC money. Can attract the most talented people around the world.

The BBC is obliged to explore and promote new and young talent. This may be an example of that. You may be surprised to know that the BBC invented videotape and NICAM stereo (amongst mush else) back when it was mandated to keep abreast of new technologies. The thing I like most about the BBC is that both (politically) left and right wing people/entities accuse the news service of bias. Ergo... Edit: "Amongst much else"

@@arthurjarrett1604 they're monitored by Offcom - an institution created to impose legislation and protect consumers - that they must remain non bias. While some stories are politically biased towards right wing, and others are left wing, they remain non bias because they are presenting both sides; that is similar to The I.

@@ollybirkbeck8888 I don't know what "The I" is, but I think you're reinforcing my point?

@@arthurjarrett1604 a British newspaper and online news service, recently taken over from The Daily Mail.

How can I not agree? This is the best evolution video after all.

no the _animator_

Your nothing but a fake

you mean i am a genius.

😆😊

Retro Astronaut he used evidence and proog

Retro Astronaut evidence?

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-dQw4w9WgXcQh.htmlttps://ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-dQw4w9WgXcQh.htmlttps://ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-dQw4w9WgXcQh.htmlttps://ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-dQw4w9WgXcQh.htmlttps://ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-dQw4w9WgXcQh.htmlttps://ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-dQw4w9WgXcQh.htmlttps://ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-dQw4w9WgXcQh.htmlttps://ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-dQw4w9WgXcQh.htmlttps://ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-dQw4w9WgXcQh.htmlttps://ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-dQw4w9WgXcQh.htmlttps://ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-dQw4w9WgXcQh.htmlttps://ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-dQw4w9WgXcQh.htmlttps://ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-dQw4w9WgXcQh.htmlttps://ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-dQw4w9WgXcQh.htmlttps://ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-dQw4w9WgXcQh.htmlttps://ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-dQw4w9WgXcQ.html MY EVELUTION VIDEO IS BETTER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

@@garlicgobyebye you know the rules, and so do I

He just copied his homework from others. He didn't have this eureka moment.

he just said we all used to be in africa , so fuck off idiot trumplican

Lmao

Indeed we all come from Africa.

I'm having a hard time imagining asians living in africa in ancient times 😂😂

Btw on p326 in the book of the decend of man Darwin explains why women are lesser huam and dogs are better.

Mabuz Louis Vs. Evolution ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-m83OdXHM01s.html

Darwin's grandfather stole the idea from Plato, Hinduism, Rosicrucianism, and Freemasonry. Darwin's grandfather was a famous Freemason.

​@@jeremyjames1659Really? Is there a valid research on this claim?

@@SoftwaresCares Nope

@@jeremyjames1659 lol

@@jeremyjames1659 exactly. The theory was around long before this racist

Darwin was agnostic.

Even the ancient Greeks had some idea that life changed over time.

Yes ancient evolution theory was influenced by the teaching of Reincarnation, advancing to higher life forms over long periods of time. ? ? Source ancient Babylon. ?

READ ABOUT THE "TEN INCARNATIONS OF VISHNU" IN HINDUISM. THESE PEOPLE STEAL EVERY WORK FROM OTHER CULTURES.

they said it on the video

Yeah, who would have thought Darwin would cause WWII?

Thank you

@Randall Wilks I agree with most of what you hv said sir becoz even my kids are not given free will at school. They hv to "believe" in "a theory" of evolution (that has unrelated evidence) & hv "faith" that the carbon dating machine is accurate. They hv to hv "faith" that the science rabbi/preacher/sensei is not in error. And the state institutions mk sure that the programming (no free will) begins when they are toddlers. If they present a different point of view, the examination system penalises them for heresy and society ridicules them into submission. Logic & rational thought (which is subjective) can only be respected & accepted within the parameters of the general education system. Otherwise opinion about an intelligent designer or architect of the universe are irrational & aren't to be given an opportunity for investigation.

@@charlesmtang.7708 That's like saying your kids have to 'believe' in the 'theory' that the Earth isn't flat

Devalued faith in humanity! These are the beliefs that motivated Josef Mengele when he worked with Hitler… quote: "the reduced adaptation, as Darwin expressed it, does not lead to eradication, but rather the effect of natural selection has been transformed through civilization into its opposite and thus to contraselection." End of quote. Then he went ahead and performed open heart surgery with no anaesthetic and while the victim was awake!

@@charlesmtang.7708 You are a moron, there are literal videos of evolution like this one. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-plVk4NVIUh8.html .Denying evolution is akin to denying gravity.

"that natural selection is a CREATIVE force for change." Natural selection creates nothing. It only destroys poorly adapted individuals. It has no new genes to deal for the survivors. They must continue with the genes they have. Natural selection makes a more one-sided gene pool, because only the "best genes" survive. If the natural surroundings change again, there is not enough variety in the gene pool and the subspecies goes extinct. No evolution.

@Dominik Zelenák *The truth about man is that he was created from clay* : water and dirt I don't know why this real scientific theory is not considered or published until people know the truth. God created Adam from (mud) and Eve from Adam’s rib and breathed into them from his spirit, and made our real and supposed goal in this life to be worship, but you deny that and the truth is that God created us from clay. And we are made into this world for worship only. As He said in the Noble Qur’an, God Almighty said in the Noble Qur’an: (I created the jinn and humans to worship Me) meaning we were created for this universe for worship, and this is the truth. for those who want the truth..

*The truth about man is that he was created from clay* : water and dirt I don't know why this real scientific theory is not considered or published until people know the truth. God created Adam from (mud) and Eve from Adam’s rib and breathed into them from his spirit, and made our real and supposed goal in this life to be worship, but you deny that and the truth is that God created us from clay. And we are made into this world for worship only. As He said in the Noble Qur’an, God Almighty said in the Noble Qur’an: (I created the jinn and humans to worship Me) meaning we were created for this universe for worship, and this is the truth. for those who want the truth..

@Dominik Zelenák اللذين عاشوا في القرون كلها صحيحه ام هذا العصر الوحيد الي تتكلم عنه يا احمق ؟؟

@Dominik Zelenák العربية لغة الجنه باذن الله

😂😂

You're a designer and you believe in evolution? LOL that's an oxymoron.

@@mostlysunny582 take your meds grandpa

A lot of crazy people and trollers

Is that a comment on evolution?

@@SusanPDavis Fuck off thats my evolution.

@@gearwar5114 Yes. I'm having a great time trolling a Hitler fan at the moment.

Greenpoloboy3 commies gotta commie engels x marx x darwin ❤️

@Po Animals do change. But that change is extremely limited. We are told over and over and over that a new species shows evolution. Nope. Speciation does not support evolution as it is an example of stasis and stasis is the exact opposite of evolution. For ex. over 200,000 species of beetles are all still beetles. There are thousands upon thousands of species of birds, bees, lizards, trees, bacteria, trees, yeast, flowers, whatever. If a new species develops within any groups at all, you can bet your bottom science dollar that it will still be just a beetle, bee, bacteria, tree, fish, or whatever. We are supposed to fill in the blanks here with...faith...and think, "Well! If a new species develops then things just keep evolving and evolving from there on." But the next taxonomic step above a species, in the animal or plant kingdom, is a family. (A genus is just a grouping of similar species together). We aren't seeing any new families, much less any new orders, classes, phyla or kingdoms forming. Anywhere. Ever. According to Darwin's so called Tree of Life and peer reviewed evolutionary literature, new families, classes, orders, etc. have evolved. Over and over and over. However, nature operates today as it did in the past. In the real world, with trillions of life forms around us, we never see anything developing to the level of a new taxonomic family. (Think domestic cats, lions and tigers, all in the same cat family). Those life forms out there have purportedly had eons and eons of ancestors preceding them which should be revealing at least one example of a part this family "transitioning" to be a part that of another family. Again, we see stasis. We only see "transitions" to those higher taxonomic levels in the purely theoretical, unverifiable, ancient past, in the realm of evolutionary literature, and never in any life around us, or in any fossils. Of course they frequently point to a fossil and say things like "Well! Look at that leg-like thing on the whale! See, it used to be in a different family, when it walked!" Except real science shows that bone is used for supporting the whale's penis in mating and theory-only pseudoscience gets spread around forever with that myth and innumerable other evo myths. If there is no evidence for transitions from one family to another - and please for your own sake try to find data if you know of any such evidence in the observable and not theoretical realm - then there is no evidence for evolution. And that's just for starters on how evolutionism defies real science. Anyone: Kindly don't think some fossil provides the evidence. It is easy to point to a pile of petrified bones and make up stories about how its invisible and evidence free descendants turned into some other life form. But if you insist, use a fossil. Name it. Then check to see how you know it even had a descendant, much less one significantly different from it, much less one that crossed the family barrier. Name the family it is transitioning out of and the one it is transitioning into. While you are at it, since we are told evolution is driven by mutations and natural selection, great. Name a life form. Find data to show it is "evolving" as the result of a named act of natural selection or mutation. Remember, the poster kids for evolution are things like antibiotic resistant bacteria, some geckos, spotted salamanders, walking stick bugs, snowflake yeast, peppered moths, sickle cell anemia victims and lactose intolerant people. As always the "proof" for evolution proves the exact opposite. All the bacteria, geckos, etc. etc., and all their descendants, continue to be nothing but bacteria, geckos, salamanders, homo sapiens etc. etc. Or if that is not the case, tell what they are "evolving" into that is not in those categories. But no one ever names the life form or the act of natural selection, or mutation, that is causing it to "evolve." They usually try to change the subject or make excuses for why they can't answer. They may claim the answers to my questions are out there. On the net. Somewhere. Then they ask me to do my research and find it - while showing no evidence that they have done any research, themselves, at all. Not uncommonly they put down a smoke screen word salad, but none of their words ever name the life form, or the act of natural selection, or mutation, I asked them to name. Anyone: You are not a goo through the zoo update. Human beings have a Heavenly Father Who made us in HIS image and likeness. He loves us and wants you to know Him, and to love Him, too. He wants us to be His children. Forever. I know I found that out myself when I was an atheist and evolutionism believer who had never looked outside the box.

And P.S. The reasons they have such great animations to "prove" evolution is because they don't have any real DATA, just theories that actually conflict with the data if you do your homework.

Mabuz Louis Vs. Evolution ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-m83OdXHM01s.html

Crocodilians be like: "hi"

@@thewordisahammer6634 eh i mean we share 90% of our DNA with orangutans, so it's highly possible

I've always thought that the "theory" of evolution was a "stupid test". If someone is stupid enough to believe that complex machines create themselves then they're stupid enough to be slaves to a dictator. Consider the flagellum which is an electrical outboard motor. It has a rotor, a field, armature, shaft and bushings, and a propeller that spins up to 10,000 rpm and can change directions almost instantly. Since we all know that machines can't think, My question for evolutionists would be, "How does the flagellum know it's job and what is it's incentive for doing it". I know what my incentive is...starvation...lol

@@brainguy3263 i think a germ can’t be a human bc come on it’s a G E R M

@@russianpooch4711 it's basic medical fact that we have trillions of germs inside our bodies keeping us alive

you should of wrote ‘Gumball’

@@brainguy3263 Oh, we have a smart one over here, congratulations! You beat 99% of biologists in the world with your overworldy wisdom and intelligence given from your creator! Quick, go to the scientific community and tell them how wrong they are! Oh wait, scientists already have a working hypothesis for how the flagellum evolved from a system of protein transport in prokaryotic organisms: doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002983 If you are SO smart, I’m sure you’ll understand this scientific paper with ease and you’ll be able to refute it.

You bet

Yet he still married his first cousin and fathers 5 children with her in full knowledge of the very high risk of health afflictions that can and did affect some of his children leading to early death . A flawed genius for sure .

@@erikkopsala3564 He was a man of his time. people still marry their close relatives. In Alabama, Mississippi, Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan, somalia, Arkansas, and many other places.

​@@Amen.ahmed1 those people are the one's who believe in evolution. sick cult.

Mabuz Louis Vs. Evolution ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-m83OdXHM01s.html

It's called the "how to get an epileptic seizure graphic animation".

@@victorymorningstar now i know why im in heaven

Wrong.

@@jasonjennings8465 prove it then.

@@ramu992 www.researchgate.net/publication/278042089_Exploring_macroevolution_using_modern_and_fossil_data www.nap.edu/catalog/11876/science-evolution-and-creationism scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C44&q=Biological+evolution+of+species&btnG=#d=gs_qabs&u=%23p%3DFtRA0lmr8FUJ www.nature.com/articles/hdy200814 Let me know when you can actually use the scientific method to refute the published evidence above. Don't give me your opinions, use the scientific method to explain how these are false. If you want to claim there is no evidence you must actually refute the published evidence that the scientific community has posted to validate the theory. They did their job. When can you either refute their actual work or admit you haven't even looked?

@@jasonjennings8465 Any one promoting creationism is delusional with mental health issues.

he literally proved evolution in his lfie time and we proved it even more when we discovered genes bruh you're actually a stone age person

I don’t I believe everything that is talked about in the Bible all you need is context do you believe in evolution but still deny the Bible have a civil conversation with me and we can talk about it

And I can't belive pepole still deny that God was the creator of the human race.

I believe in people who cant admit there wrong. I can believe that people dont believe in evolution. (They should)

@@dr.mastermind2264 I cant believe that people still believe books that were written 2000 years ago 🙄✋ If you wish to tell me I'm wrong. Prove god. Prove the afterlife. Prove the bible. (Or you can't do that)

@@rocketthedog1409 I gladly will accept your challenge but first I want to know a little bit about you so do you believe in all 6 types of evolution or just the one type that has been proven? Also are you an atheist or agnostic? Lastly, if you were wrong and the God of the Bible were true would that have an impact in your life?

@@Black-Circle yea its science duhh did you really think god shaped the earth in 7 days

@Black Circle Everyone their own beliefs

@@Black-Circle bullshit, everyone their own belief but i dont belief in god.

@@Black-Circle do you really think evolutionary theory has *anything* to do with the origin of the universe? If you do, then you're definitely an idiot.

Even Idea of Natural Selection predates Darwin. By Al Jahiz et al

32 seconds into the video (did you even WATCH it?) and your criticism becomes moot...

@wolf pup Show me where Quantum Physicists are studying ""universe's infinite consciousness". I think you have mistaken hippies for physicists... Evolutionary sciences are still at the forefront of science today, and Darwin got way more right than he got wrong. You need to attend some actual science conferences to see what is happening in the real world.

@@bladerunner6282 I am criticizing the TITLE. I referenced it specifically. Does the BBC not have one science consultant to check TITLES of videos that will be viewed millions of times by the public?

@@swapanzameen6302 Show me where someone laid out the details of Natural Selection BEFORE Darwin and Wallace...

Ah yes! The good old 👁 !!

LaMarck's theory, while a precursor to Darwin's, was fundamentally incorrect, as he believed acquired traits could be inherited between generations.

it was incorrect tho it was a precurso sure but it was not really right it had some errors which were fundamental

@Notger, Prince-évêque de Liège nope streching tob e taller and expecting your kids tob e the same is very diffrent from epigenetics epigenetics mostly isn't transmissable in populations usually only lasts for a bit then goes away but normal genetics is permanent

u should read more

Please explain this: Www.evolutionvsgod.com

@@trs1562 that can be explained by lifelong indoctrination and a lack of critical thinking skills/ scientific education. not everyone gets it, i suppose.

@@trs1562 religion thought the earth was flat and that humans were made up of 4 liquids

@@duckagon9359 ☺ That's because they didn't read their Bibles. The Catholic church forbid them to read it in their own language or face the death penalty. The book of Isaiah says God sits above the circle of the earth. www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Isaiah+40%3A22&version=NKJV

I can tell you a evolution life on earth in Islam Religion, You can learn that From Quran Book of Islam and you can find a Muslim Who knows Don't worry Islam is perfect religion from God,God created Islam only one religion in world and The rest is a misguided man -made religion

Or you can find in internet about what I say it

No one has a better explanation. There are just religious biases against it,using the same old tired and refuted arguments.

@@johngavin1175 So how exactly humans evolved from chimps? Care to explain?

@@techgame9871That's like saying English evolved from German. We didn't evolve from chimps. We have a common ancestor with them. Try reading some literature from actual scientists,you may learn something.

ohhhh the description

that is called delusion.

Mabuz Louis Vs. Evolution ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-m83OdXHM01s.html

الله يابوصبحان Wisdom is in your blood

طب يا سيدس شكرا

👏👏👏

I got shivers through my spine

Shoot, I think I missed it. Time stamp?

@@thezarcfiles2857 5:06

its right tho and yeah lol the narrator was so angry

This is the reality not a fake theory ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-x1U04W68t5k.html

A scientific theory is a hypothesis that is verified experimentally in controlled mathematical models or observed in real world. The word 'theory' is used scientifically and not colloquially like The Theory of Gravitation etc

Because of evolution, obviously.

There is lots of evidence for God www.evolutionvsgod.com

What a silly comment.

@@trs1562 not ONE bit of credible evidence for a god in there lol

Yeal, evolutionism absolutely depends on computer animation and other phony art work to make up for their lack of real scientific in their pseudoscience narratives.

@@thewordisahammer6634 It's science though, right? Can you prove otherwise?

@@swun3367 No, sorry but it is not real science. It is pseudoscience. If you have an animation that purportedly represents a fossil, but does not match the fossil, then you have pseudo science. For just one example fossil animations of Lucy show her with human looking hands and feet. Her fragmented fossil didn't even have hands and feet! Others of her species have been found and they had curled toes and fingers as you would find on arboreal monkeys. But those are never shown. Let's deal with Darwin for now. Then the ball will be in your court. You can feel free to give any refuting observable data on any point of the observable scientific data that I am about to present. Let's look at the "Bible" of evolutionism, The Origin of Species. Maybe because it is so mind numbingly boring, people rarely notice something, namely that it never shows the origin of anything! Darwin's finch beaks are supposed to support goo through the zoo to you, but what do they really show? Zero. Living finches, and their fossils, are all over the planet showing various size beaks, varying sizes of body parts, and many other physical differences. They are all nothing but finches. The fossils and living evidence that Galapagos Island Turtles et al have ever been or ever will be anything but turtles et al? Zero again. In evolutionism you always ignore the real data, or spin the actual evidence, and then make up data-free stories from the conveniently unverifiable, invisible, ancient past. Oh, and btw, as usual in evolutionary theory you are being told one thing while the opposite is true, as about natural selection. It does not lead to evolution as Darwin claimed. It only shuffles, or sometimes eliminates, pre existing information that has always been in the genes. It never creates original strands of DNA as would be necessary, for ex., to turn a fin into a foot or a leg into a wing. Nothing ever observed creates original strands of DNA. All DNA is just a copy of a copy of a copy which can be altered by things like mutations - to a very limited extent. Beneficial mutations? They are said to be the second force for evolution. However, Charles Muller, who won a Nobel Prize for his work on them, said "The good ones are so rare that we can consider them all bad." Darwin was nothing but an armchair theorist who, unlike his contemporary Mendel, never supported his theory through the scientific method and cast doubts on it himself. Yet he is an icon of evolution, like another contemporary, a lawyer named George Lyell, who came up with the totally fictional Geologic Column. The GC exists only in art work. The real evidence? Fossils are jumbled, in no neatly organized pattern whatsoever. There really are no such things as Cambrian, Jurassic, and so on "periods." Like the GC those are just fictions presented as facts. Giant shark fossils are found with dino fossils in Montana, for ex. Whales' fossils are found in wildly improbable places like the Andes mountains, the Sahara and a desert in Chile. Deep sea "Cambrian" fossils, such as sea shells and mollusks, are found at every level on the planet, including on most mountain tops - like the world's highest, the Himalayans. Fossils of ocean floor trilobites are found in the hills of mid America and countless other places world wide, high and far inland. Take a look. Notice the brown, somewhat egg shaped, fossil on a greyish background in the middle, 2nd row. That is an ocean floor dwelling, extinct, trilobite. www.bing.com/images/search?q=Marine+Fossils+On+Mountains&FORM=RESTAB ) Notice the exquisitely preserved details on it. Now some claim "plate tectonics" moved those vast stretches of ocean dwelling, bottom floor, marine life fossils to travel for millions of years and then wrap around the tops of mountains, completely intact and with perfect detail as you see in the link. It's like they never even heard of erosion. If you wnnt to convince me there is a Geologic Column, please link close up photos. They should show lowest level "Cambrian" fossils at the bottom and higher level "era" fossils ascending upwards from there to match the GC. Now, I don't mean far off, distant photos of piles of rocks and mountain ranges which they CLAIM have a GC in it, but, again, close up photos. The Bible says that flood waters completely covered the whole earth after, for one thing, "the fountains of the deep broke forth." (Did you know there is an ocean below our commonly known oceans, or have you seen the mid Atlantic ridge which looks like it used to be a great crack on the ocean floor? Probably not.). The fossil record shows that marine life fossils are at every level on the planet, everywhere around the globe, and that, in fact, over 99% of the fossils on land are marine. And they say the Bible is not historical and not backed by science. And btw there are almost 300 Great Flood legends around the world. For example, the one by the Aborigines of Australia is virtually identical to what the Bible reports. Have you been told that there are huge cities found on ocean floors around the world? At least one such city has a pyramid bigger than those in Egypt. So you've been told a book showed the origin of species, but it didn't. You've been told G.I. animals show evolution but they only show they are having, at most, minimal changes that leave them basically what they were before, still turtles, finches, etc. You were told there is a Geological Column, but there is not one on the planet. You're told over and over that natural selection shows evolution when it actually just somewhat modifies the organism through shifting already present information, or sometimes through loss of information in the genomes, leaving it essentially what it was before. It may eventually become a new species of fish, or bee, or tree, etc., but it will always stay a fish, a bee or a tree etc. We see no evidence whatsoever of any species moving up to the next step on the Animal or Plant Kingdom, to become a previously unknown family, order class, phylum or kingdom. We have trillions of life forms out there. So why don't we see mutations causing any Lifeform A to turn into a Lifeform B? After all, their ancestors have supposedly had hundreds of millions of Darwin years to make the switch and be moving around as part A and part B. But fish are staying fish, birds and are staying birds, flowers are staying flowers, mold is staying mold, trees are staying trees, monkeys are staying monkeys, bacteria are staying bacteria, etc., no matter how much they change. Again in the real world we see new species but we never, ever see a species turning into the next step up on the animal kingdom (plants ditto), a different family. Yet that would have had to have happened for evolution to occur, and it is claimed, with no evidence whatsoever, that it did happen over and over and over. What else does evolutionism offer besides unsubstantiated theories, in fact theories that defy the real evidence, presented as facts? Logical fallacies. Logical fallacies always, always, undergird evolutionism defense. The favorites are Correlation Does Not Imply Causation and Presuming Omniscience, though it uses many. Correlation Does Not Imply Causation goes like this: Fossil A is seen to have some similarity to Fossil B. There is no evidence whatsoever that Fossil A or B, or C etc. ever had a single descendant that was significntly different from themselves, but still we are told that they all led to one another. Parrots are bipedal, sing and dance, and sometimes speak appropriately, like humans. Sharks and dolphins have "similar homology". Spiders and octopuses have 8 legs radiating out of their round bodies, etc. etc. So it goes in nature. Correlation Does Not Imply Causation. That leads right into the Presuming Omniscience logical fallacy. Another example of a use of that fallacy is when an evolutionary paleontologist will pick up a fossil from the ground and tell you with absolute authority that they know all about what happened to it's invisible "descendants" in the untestable past - for over 100 million Darwin years! "Missing links" is a Presuming Omniscience logical fallacy phrase. How do you tell missing links from never existed links? Have...faith...brothers and sisters! And be so grateful that YOU ain't religious! Learn how to spot logical fallacies and you will see them in every defense in evolutionary literature. Ignoring the actual data is also part of evolutionism. For just one of innumerable examples, they say life can come from inorganic matter (and don't say they do not - who came up with the antiscientific primal pond, creationists?) The data, what real science uses, shows life, always and only, comes from life and life of the same kind. Pile theories presented as facts on top of logical fallacies, ignore the real data or try to spin it away, and stir well with sophistry. Then you have evolutionary theory. Anyone with eyes to see and a heart that loves truth and true science: You're not a fish update. You have a Creator Who made you and loves you and wants you to know Him, and to love Him too. Don't trade that in for pseudo science mumbo jumbo.

@@thewordisahammer6634 You do know that Lucy isn't the only australopitechus ever found, right?

@@matteomastrodomenico1231 400 fragments have been found of her species. Again, curled toes were found. There was zero evidence that she or any of the others was transitioning to be anything but more A.A. This is true for all of evolutionism's so called transitions. All those fossilized in the same species are observed to stay the same species. (Now sometimes new species are created, but they never, ever move outside their taxonomic families. Bacteria stay bacteria in their bacterial domain, 100s of thousands of species of beetles stay beetles, plants stay plants, molds stays mold, insects stay insects, fish and birds stay fish and birds, etc. etc. etc. Therefore we can know for sure no evolution happens ever.) As usual, actual observable scientific data like that is considered irrelevant. What is consider relevant by evolutionists are fantasies about how because some fossil showed this or that similarity to this or that other life form, then they were turning into this or that other life form.. Thus we see the inevitable and consistent use of the Correlation Does Not Imply Causation and Presuming Omniscience logical fallacies which undergirds evolution theories. Real science is resal logical. Pseudo science is based on unsupported theories presented as gawd's truth facts. With fake computer animation and art work and not uncommonly, flat out lies.

Yet people don’t believe a creator of life exists... wow! Trees, animals, humans, eyes all extremely complex but somehow this came by chance! Lol wow now that’s faith!! People believe with enough time this animation could have made itself... Did Darwin Murder God? ru-vid.com/group/PLrCQerz2L0IfFeDqgU_nu5_j1ruVSZKQ7

@@drezilla1310 complexity is not a miracle.

@@nandhakishor2659 what a unintelligent statement.

@@drezilla1310 It is not a miracle. Imagine that the first cell formed doesn't got any changes still it remains same now, then it would have been a miracle. But it did change to other forms which means no miracle has happened. It is easy for you to draw an abstract figure rather than a perfect circle. Same analogy works here.

@@nandhakishor2659 how exactly do you define a miracle then?

European Patriot Not

"Brilliant theories in biology" you mean the satanist that is directly responsible for millions or perhaps even over a billion people going to hell? Here's evidence against evolution: docs.google.com/document/d/1UTuACFnZvvQm9TvfraWTFQ8ZpxNUSLlImRtqxIWsVrQ/edit

@@x-popone6817 if he's a satanist , then i will gladly accept satanism cause it seems more logical than blindly believing in some invisible being, if that invisible being wanted me to worship him, then he shouldn't have created me with freewill.

@@ramu992 you're on ur way to hell, loser.

@@ramu992 i dont blindly believe

How do you know?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:List_of_Wikipedia_articles_censored_in_Saudi_Arabia

@@Aamie Thx bro!

They also banned the article on Clitoris! It's not enough that the women have to sit all day at home, the man are also scared of the little man in the boat.

Maybe its because of this: www.evolutionvsgod.com