There Will Never Be Another Game Like Call of Duty Black Ops 3 

You and so many of the other zombies personalities really went off with this game and it shows that Black Ops 3 is still the raining champ of zombies for content, it might not be the most nostalgic (BO2) but it still continues to bring the best moments the most fun🙏

great stuff ch0p, hope the LA trip went well and MAYBE some boogie boys content 👀

A perfect video to end the year, great creator with a great video on a great game? bro clutching up to end 2022.

Black Ops Cold War is releasing worldwide tonight. But before we can jump into the Easter egg hunt tomorrow, I owe you all an explanation addressing a story that's circulating surrounding me. A few weeks ago I uploaded a RU-vid video explaining the black ops storyline, when researching for this video I came across a smaller youtuber called suggestive gaming, who created a very similar storyline idea and I thought it was brilliant, he explained the games really well and I really enjoyed his video style. The relevance of this is I used his script and very similar visuals in my video when explaining call of duty world at war, Black Ops 1, and Black Ops 3. These explanations were copied word for word from his video and whilst I did credit him in the description, this is nowhere near enough to justify the blanton plagiarism since I was not given permission to use his script or to use his visual style. There is no excuse for this behavior and I'm deeply regretting ever considering what I did, with the platform that I have I should be setting an example for smaller creators to follow and this is not the example to set whatsoever. I've already apologized to him privately and publicly on Twitter but I know it is not enough without addressing it on the platform that the issue first began from, my apology did not explain what I did nor address what I'm going to do to rectify it. I want to say to suggestive gaming and to everyone watching who feels let down by my actions, I'm truly sorry. Knowing I've disappointed so many of you brings me a great deal of regret. Furthermore I want to extend this apology to anyone who feels I've over stepped the mark and used their content in a plagiaristic manner or without permission over the years, this has truly served as a moment for reconsideration, over the last 24 hours I've been reflecting on what has happened and I really want to try rectifying my wrong doings and going forward on improving so that this never happens again. I offered to give suggestive gaming all the ad revenue that the video made, but he declined. As a starting point to try and apologize for everyone that's been affected, I'm going to donate the entire videos ad revenue which is roughly around 400 dollars to a charity called special affect. Furthermore I'm donating a further 600 dollars to special affect. On behalf of all the content creators in the past who I've upset by posting videos that could be considered plagiarizing their ideas. Going forward I promise to do better I've severely let you all and myself down and I do not blame you if you do not want to support my content anymore. I've been as open and honest about the situation as possible to you all and opening up about it on RU-vid rather then explaining it on social media, and I can only hope that you can accept my apology in time. If you do want to go and check suggestive gaming's original video, I've got it linked in this videos description. Everyone makes mistakes, and we are all human at the end of the day. Thank you for watching.

I love this game to death, and im glad to see you share the same thoughts. As ive watched your videos i feel like you really do think almost the same way i do about these games. Thanks for giving this one the love it deserves

congrats on your recovery bro

@@lawliet3432 thanks man. Still going strong 💪🏻 Idk where I’d be without BO3, as funny as that is to say.

Congratulations on getting clean bro. Zombies in this game helped me when I lost my mother. Shit kept me straight

@@Bakunawa661 seriously bo3 zombies of all things? Strange but hey if it helped you that's all that matters :)

@@Funnylittleman you realise bo3 is just a game right? The choice to recovery was all you.. So congrats on your recovery :)

The menu's in general of the games around that time before and just a little after BO3 were still solid. It was a game like BO4 and onward where it started to completely drop off. Cold War was probably the last good menu we had but that was only because of the music. I despise the endless walking they did it was so not cool. But you are correct!

The track is called “Ignition” and it’s a perfectly chill song I can play on Spotify while doing something else.

@@OrionInSpace I actually quite liked bo4s menu, I thought it was simple and brought a new aesthetic, I mean it made sense it was not futuristic yet since the story takes place before bo3.

@@Positive11929 I actually agree with you, that was one of the best parts of the game. That menu and its music and imagery was solid. The rest of the game is questionable but I agree.

fr

it also feels like youtube was in its best time, so many iconic channels at their peak

It was a truly magical time

Not aure why everyone loves these "older" shitty cods now, it was ass, still is ass, it had a decemt zombies but its what ruined zombies as a whole, the campaign was an absolute snooze fest and i can usually finish the campaigns since they are short, the myltiplayer felt weird but after advanced warfare it felt unccesary, advanced warfare was actually good, it had a decent campaign and the exo suits worked well for their first time and it felt unique not to mention the maps that would change dynamically and take you to a new zone with cool tsunamis and shit, black ops 3 was just anither future game with old cod style with weird shit

Same bro. My opinion the last great cod

@n0lat bo3 had complete perfection jetpack movement instead of dashes forward backwards so on. The campaign was dogshit so true. But the zombies is legit one of the best in the franchise, with b01 being the closest thing to it, maybe even better. Idk how u can just be a hypocrite and say us people like the old shitty cod games when one of your favorites is advanced warfare. Cmon, now that just doesn't make sense.

yeah the time you could put into this game was endless. Probably have 10x the time there of all other cods combined. Bought a few but mostly was a waste of money considering the time I put in.

my last cod game as well. None of the newer games really excited me like bo3 did. Wish I could get that feeling again lol. Not sure how to describe it but Infinite Warfare felt like a major vibe shift in the wrong direction and turned me off from cod.

@@Hunter-uz9jw lol Infinite Warfare is an improved Black Ops 3 in every single department

@Jet the Judge there was barely anything fun about infinite warfare imo. It truly was one of the cod installments in the series. Mw2 2022 is putting cod back on the map

@@r011ing_thunder6 MW2 isn't very good, especially compared to Infinite Warfare. It's not even close when comparing the quality of their content, not to mention the superior connection system and hit detection present in Infinite Warfare that modern games fail to surpass.

Slowly? I can't find a free for all match at all.

BO3 was great. I remember spending $3,000 for supply drops and still not getting the guns I wanted. Good memories.

@@rayon3793 lol

@@nathanb4048fr

@@rayon3793 and this is why I would never gamble on a game ahaha

@@rayon3793 Literally.

lmfaoo this comment took a turn

play cod world at war that game that game has the stalingrad battle between the russians and germans old but gold💯 bo3 zombies focuses on its own story instead with weird time travel stuff and chthulu looking creatures this is why i prefer bo2 none of that weird shit

You telling me that robots didn’t fight dragons in ww2?

I hope your grandfather suffered the fate he deserved, if he volunteered in the R(apist)ed army

Well i mean. It's zombies, what'd you expect?

truely grateful for that

Literally same and it’s the most fun game I’ve ever had

It had the best supply drops too.

@@rayon3793no it didn’t lol mwr, ww2 and post overhaul bo4 were way better

Advanced warfare did jet packs 10x better

@@rayon3793bo4 without a doubt.

@@johanngoethe8428 For me Advanced Warfare’s jet packs where a little too powerful. There was people jumping all lover the map and it took time to master. Unlike Bo3 where everything felt a little more ground. Just me though

That's the best way to explain this game. BO3 in it's prime was so much damn fun

Same. I didn't like the multiplayer but the zombies was my first experience in the games prime. The hype I had for that game was ridiculous

I was there for those cods and I prefer BO3. Best cod

I prefer Black Ops 2 but Black Ops 3 is by far the best cod ever made since 2013. Not even close.

​@@scvboy1cold war is the only one that comes somewhat close

Story is ass I’m not reading this

Holy shit this story is complicated. So you basically never left the operating table... But if the first mission is the final one then what is hendrick doing there since Taylor killed him

@@zaer-ezart Thats a bit tricky. The game doesnt do a very good job of explaining this, but what seems to be going on is the rooftop mission in the Campaign where "Taylor" dies to "Hendricks" is the very last mission of Taylors memories chronologically, as thats when the final member of the real Taylors team was killed by the real Hendricks. Both Hendricks and Taylor are the only survivors of the original team, which is why theyre both alive during the first mission, the mission you as the player actually meet them. Everything that happens after that chronologically deviates from Taylors memories. While its never made really clear, there are two prevailing theories. One is that there never was an attack on Zurich afterwards, which means that the death of Hendricks and Kane likely doesnt happen at all, and everything that happens in the Zurich Mission is completely simulated before the DNI purge that erases you at the end of the game. Two, is that Zurich does happen directly after the first mission, and that while youve been going through the memories of Taylors missions, youve been puppeting his body around from inside his DNI. This would mean Hendricks and Kanes deaths do happen, and that you esentially kill yourself with the DNI purge, returning Taylors body to his control at the end of the game.

I see the BO3 story as the superposition of two timelines. The first is the Manhunt of Dylan Stone and the rogue team PHI, and the other is the DNI infection. While the DNI infection plot it’s related to both timelines, the missions on this timeline were the first two and the last one. All the plot of the Manhunt of Dylan Stone it's quite literal what you see while playing those missions but the motives were different. They didn’t go rogue because a DNI infection, it’s because they saw the illegal experiments of Coalescence Corporation that they wanted to let the people know the truth. They were called to Black Station because the CIA wanted to kill them in order to keep their secrets buried but Stone and the others discovered the plan and kill their executioners. Now, Hendricks and Taylor were on a mission to stop them. Hendricks is irritated as the plot develops not because the infection. It’s because he wasn’t feeling right about killing their former friends, so he was stressed as fuck (I think Hendricks is more human when you see it like this). While playing the missions Demon Within and the mission of the refinery, Hall and Kane refer to you as Taylor, foreshadowing the ending. This doesn’t seem that clear because the player answers on both occasions that he will stop Taylor. One year later, starts the DNI infection plot. As you know, you got killed in the second mission after your injuries on the first mission. The agony of the players created Corvus and infected you and the new Taylor team while they were in your DNI. Corvus will create a simulation to get the answers about the reasons of the Coalescence Projects. During the simulation, the consciousness of the player merged with Taylor and the player believe Hall, Diaz and the others were the bad guys. Every time the story changes the location to Singapur, Cairo and Zurich, the player gets disoriented. That it’s seen when Hendricks says to us: Are you still with us? or the first time you enter the safehouse when the player says: Where are we again? After, killing all of Taylor’s team (because yes, Hall, Diaz and Maretti actually die because they were considered hostile by the player), Hendricks wants to get revenge on Coalescence because it was their fault that they were tasked to kill Stone and the others and now, another time, caused a DNI infection that made Taylor become crazy (controlled by the player to kill Diaz and the others). This is the final mission where you have to stop Hendricks. This mission wasn’t a simulation. You are playing as Taylor but the player's consciousness takes control over his DNI. That it’s seen in the very first cutscene makes you seem like you are disoriented. That’s why Kane said to you if you are still with her. Coming from the simulation, the player thinks he has to kill Hendricks because of the infection, but as I said, it was not because of that. If you think of it, it's kinda similar to the Reznov hallucination that Mason had. Once you killed Hendricks, Corvus will put you in another simulation to prevent you from killing for real because he needed you in order to get answers. The whole simulation it’s about clearing the infection. At the end you erase your consciousness from Taylor’s DNI and that's why he says Taylor at the end, because as I said, you were playing as him during the whole mission except from the simulation where Taylor was a bug caused by the merging of two consciousness in one DNI. I didn’t see anyone explaining the story like this but I think that this is what makes more sense. I didn’t comment on all the details due to the length of this. To conclude. Try replaying it, while reading the data vault (which explains you more connections with the BO2 universe) where you can read about the factions, the explanation of the NRC - Cairo war motives and much more to get the full context of the setting. Try to do research on the intro logs. Then, once players understand the story as it meant to be played, make a good appreciation of the campaign before saying it’s trash because it was bad written when it was designed to do research by a whole community (that is even related to the fact that they made this campaign coop in order to make all players put the pieces together) For those who wanted them to continue Mason’s family, BO3 actually did it. If you enter in “Project Prometheus” and then in “Candidates” in the data vault, you will find the name of the four players. One of them is C.Mason. The individual letter it’s because you can customize your gender so it would make any sense to give a real name at all. How do I know it? Well, it’s because of the individual letter of the name, because there are four, and because it says two of them died and the other two were not considered to join the project because of their injuries (first mission). Also I don’t think Treyarch just put a Mason character for nothing. If they didn’t give you an actual name it’s because they focussed on questioning the future of humanity. It wasn’t about a soldier or war, it was about life supremacy over all the technology (fuck the last mission is called life). Of course, the coop had to do with this concept of not giving names. Also if you put the first letter of each protocols of the intro log (which can be seen without doing nothing) and put them in the order of the events, you get “We are Taylor” the same way you get “Reznov is dead” by doing the same thing in the BO1 campaign. As I see it, the story was very good, but Treyarch forgot they are making a Call of Duty and the players would not do what they were trying. So yes, it’s underrated and overhated as fuck. Even playing it without understanding the full context, at least you understand what is happening in every mission. The problem was that the last one requires you to put things in place but still that point the campaign is very understandable, at least for me anyways. The characters were kinda human. Stone team questioned their past actions once they discovered a project that caused the death of hundreds of thousand and try to reveal the truth, Hendricks questioning his mission because they were his friends, and the romance between Kane and Taylor it’s not the typical US vs Soviets (or russian) that COD usually does. Also if you think about, Taylor is a tragical character. He losts his two teams (Stone one, and Diaz one), his best friend Hendricks and the love of his life Kane. In what other COD campaign you feel like this?

I'm impressed you find the gameplay smooth. It's incredibly clunky, and the engine really has shown its age. The advanced movement feels like an afterthought in how it performs, and I can't play the game anymore with how bad it feels to play. The gunplay is fine, outside of the firing audio. Moving in the game just feels like wading through water

@@fatefulwaffle sounds like a skill issue

Titanfall did it first. That is the better game.

BO3 shits on titanfall and BO3 was just part of an annual game release@@AHess007

skill issue@@fatefulwaffle

Black Ops 3 was the last true COD game I played that involved playing with my friends and other people... I will miss those days for sure. Do you still stream?

@@OrionInSpace I'm currently not streaming. I'm revamping the channel so I'll be returning in a couple of weeks. I was streaming BOIII on PC but there were a lot of security issues with the game so unfortunately I had to stop playing it. I love BOIII Zombies but shame people can mess around on PC. I'll be on MW2 and Nintendo related games for sure :)

@@Jinukov ya I've heard BO3 on PC is a pain in the ass and needs fixing. But hey that's dope. I was going to ask if you wanted to collaborate, I may not stream but I do have my RU-vid.

@@OrionInSpace Yeah man, I had to literally get a new router cuz there are programs on BO3 that actually find your location and IP Address. I'd get so frustrated during my streams because they'd interrupt Easter Egg attempts and all that and tell. As for collaborating, what do you mean? Do what exactly?

@@Jinukov ya no I heard about all of that. So unfortunate cause now Chopper and Lex and all of them can't play anymore. So depressing. In terms of collaborating I meant in the sense of we'd make content together through your stream and my channel by playing together. That make more sense?

This game had the one thing that all modern COD games (the last 4 specifically) don't have. Community and social activities. Like you said it was a fun game to play regardless if no new content was out yet. That's because a game like this gave the community the tools to do things on our own. The paintjob, emblem editor, theater mode, PC mods for zombies overall, free run mode as a fun aspect to the movement of the game, etc etc etc. This gave players something to work for when not playing the game or needing to release stress off a rough day of playing. At this same time, this game still followed the same formulas of old that made COD games fun even if something like the movement was completely changed. The perk system wasn't changed, spectator view, weapon balancing was good, maps were fun as hell. What more can I say?

That’s why bo3 is good tho custom zombie maps what regardless.

@@OrionInSpace also call of the dead remake is so much better in bo3 zombies :)

Bo3 is the best no matter :)

The best part is bo3 zombies kept the perk system:)

Lex i love youuuuuu😍😍😍😍

I recently beat it in realistic and God damn it's hard Like halo legendary hard

​@sethisevilone02 i started it on realistic and was confused why I was dying so fast then realized it LITERALLY only takes one bullet to kill me 😂

If he stated it as an opinion it would be ok i guess but he doesn't

Because it's factual information

It's an amazing game, and no COD game they make will ever hold a candle to it again. It's nowhere near as good as AW in terms of campaign, but it's still amazing in terms of multiplayer.

You’re gonna run into a lot of invisible hackers, unfortunately

@@aidan46294 haven't encountered hackers yet (~10-15 matches) Hope it stays that way🤞🏼

I redownload it every now and then just to do the origins and Zet subou easter eggs

All CoD games are garbage - just factory churned products that more focus and attention by the board room execs rather than the devs. Just another generic multiplayer military shooter that removed the single player component. Trendy modern gamers will eat up and trendy piece of shit that gets tossed at them and call it amazing.

@@dani_i8942 and what games do you play may I ask?

😂😂😂

it’s so overrated it’s crazy, i got my first supply drop weapon at prestige master level 70 or 80. No kidding, the rng in those loot boxes were such a scam

It's still a great cod game.

@@aidan46294 it also takes your money lol

@X3 ur reply was so dumb that there's no point trying to tell you why u sound stupid by making that comment

Same, for me BO3 is only nostalgic for its Goated Zombies

To speak on that teaser too, that's the kind of marketing I wish COD would put more money into. Something that will make you intrigued and interested. Yes you are right the campaign even after this trailer was one of the 3 worst ever in the franchise but the trailer itself was what was good. Nowadays with trailers we get a damn useless "Squad Up" trailer with people and celebrities just yelling the phrases and nothing more.

@@OrionInSpace not that there’s anything wrong with the MW squad characters like Captain Price and Ghost. They’re all great but I still prefer when CoD takes a more deeper and psychological approach to their campaigns. That’s why BO1’s campaign is still my favorite of the entire CoD franchise.

@@XxHUNT3RN4T0RxX I mean ya Treyarch is known for doing that, Infinity Ward is more known for the gritty, real and just more military esk type stuff

@@XxHUNT3RN4T0RxX You remember the old MW2 trailers where people would talk about the game as if it was people having sex? Lmao. I think there were multiple people used for it but I remember some old man saying it the most

​@@OrionInSpacegotta say I'm sad that you see it that way. I don't know why but I've played bo2s campaign bo3 MW2 mw3 and all of the latest 4. I have to say bo3 behind MW2 and bo2 is my favourite campaign from the pure story. I just got so deep in it and it was catching me so damn hard. I don't know why but me as a 19 years old loved bo3 for it's campaign first and mp second (when zombies chronicles released zombies 1 mp3 campaign 3)

I would always call them in throughout the game in order to maximize kill efficiency

When BO3 launched the scorestreaks actually sucked and required multiple patches and updates. Same can be said about the weapons where Treyarch was always doing multiple changes to weapons.

Bo2 better scorestreaks

BO1 streaks >

Lots of people hate the easter egg but I loved it. Big fan of the long quest-style maps like origins and zns

Same

@@shonthacreator6146 Christ 10? I was 22.

Hey G, I’m also 17 and this was my first call of duty

There are many people who still love zombies. Find them. But yeah back then it was truly awesome, there were always friends online who were playing it. You could just write into PlayStation communities (Why is this gone?!?! 😭) and have a squad for easter eggs few minutes later.

Yeah

lol not sure what game you played but I was always being yelled at by toxic players

@@angryoldcanadian3905 the only people that got yelled at were the ones that were down 4 times per round or didn’t go with the map strat. Now if you’re talking multiplayer then your in the wrong thread.

@@CrackSparrowGaming yeah was about to say zombies is what really made the community so strong.

This made my day, much love man

@@Ch0pperI CANT BELIEVE YOU SAW IT. Much love to you too bro ur the goat ❤️

AW didn't have wall running. It did have advanced movement. Opinion before BO3's release was split on another futuristic advanced movement game. Everyone who played BO3 no longer had issue because it was, and still is, the most balanced COD multiplayer to date. It had the most DLC sales of any game for 2015, 16 and 17 as well. You can't do that without being overwhelmingly dedicated and large playerbase. I've been playing COD since 05 or 06, COD2, and playing video games and shooters a hell of a lot longer than that. BO3 earned it's reputation and fandom on the merits of gameplay alone. To this day it's still the best, most balanced and fair COD in tons of aspects. No game in the series has had less camping, due in part because of the maps and the advanced movement, snipers didn't have aim assist, the most balanced perks, the best perk system (Pick 10), balanced weapon attachments, variety in meta, balanced variety of guns, no one hit kill melee, and no SBMM BS to ruin the games. If it wasn't for a couple specialist abilities it's damn near perfect gameplay at what it does. People were excited for AW at first because it broke up the monotony of BOTG. They should have never made 3 advanced movement games in a row. That's what actually killed it; they traded one monotonous design for another. AW should have swapped with Ghosts and WW2 should have been after BO3, and IW should have been doing whatever Treyarch was not going to do after BO3, because BO4 sounded like it was originally going to have jetpacks as well. Now we're stuck playing Modern Camper for now til eternity and now the only thing people play is the not-a-battle-royale mode.

@@The_Hater_AKA_Truth_Teller what a bummer, hate when a small group of people ruin things

@@MrSuperflydude yeah i play on pc and ps4 and yes zm and mp have players

I still kinda wished that it tied back to the story of bo1-2 more

I thought the campaign was a masterpiece ppl just hate on it bc it isn’t a sequel to the other black ops games

Campaign is a masterpiece

Dingo, Drakon & Brecci. All packed.

Worst story though

I don't get why people would dislike the futuristic setting, wallruns and jetpacks unless they're like 50yo and can't process it. It fits so well for a game like cod. Especially at that time back then there were good games like Battlefield that were more traditional.

Modern era, Sci fi era, History era they are all great it's nice to switch things up every once in a while

hackers killed it, no amount of publicity can fix its latent problems.