These Are The Models I Built Before Youtube (Tanks, Bulldozers And Submarines 😱) 

It's your channel my dude! If you feel like the intro does not mesh with your content, or you personally dislike it, then by all means, dump it! One's image of themselves is a substantial factor of their happiness, and we want to see uncle Night Shift happy, cause that's when he makes his best content, so do what makes you happy! I personally find the intro comforting, and it sets s relaxing mood for me, but I feel like I'm not just speaking for myself when I say I'd still watch your videos if you got rid of, or changed the intro! You do you, and keep making cool modeling (and if you want, other) vids! It's nice to see quality content coming from this end of Europe! 😁👍🏻

My wife and i enjoy your tanks. And you say sometimes and you say .i dont like it, she just laughed. Saying whats wrong with it, its perfect. I said thats the problem with him hes a perfectionist like me. Lol

Yay!

Great!!! It is so nicely made, distinct & 100% your personal trademark.

Yay!

I find myself skipping intros in all videos, and it can get particularly distracting when you're binge-watching something. Also, now I can jump right into action without a prologue followed by an intro :)

agreed. Its the little touches like that that really draws me to a channel. yeah they might be tedious to do but that extra effort really pulls the whole thing together IMHO. Not going to stop me from watching though

@@NightShiftScaleModels put it as an outro?

Night Shift I get it, I’m just a bit sad the intro is gone, I never really skipped it because it’s short and really nice lol

the intro is awesome D: keep neon intro pls

I know the feeling. By an order of magnitude.

Just keep practicing, I used to really suck (and I’m still not the best) but a few tool changes made them look better

@@getoutside9854 lmao yeah just watch a shit ton of videos for tips and stuff and you’ll improve greatly. I’d know, half the techniques I use now I didn’t know when I started and my models when I started are.... well yeah....

Edit: By look better I mean that glue puddles on the side went aways and I started fitting parts etc I didn’t mean paint or anything

practice makes perfect , never underestimate urself!

night shift, not night watch.

@@andrew6745 LOL! That'll teach me to wake up, grab coffee, and post before drinking. ;) Fixing now... :)

I will miss the intro if it goes away, but it will also become a nostalgia thing I guess

Yes keep the intro. Keep the chill quiet funky background music, and the sense of humour.

Pair bordum.

Abnormal women 1983.

Won't bear.

@Cody Sonnet nein

@Cody Sonnet no periscopic sights so it doesn't have the chieftain seal of approval

oh yes

@Cody Sonnet the T-34/85 was faster than the Panther, german tanks are fast in paper but their acceleration is bad which means its harder to get to top speed. Plus when driving the tank the driver must be careful in rough terrain to not break the drive sprockets. Another thing is that the tank isn't perfect nor the first MBT, the frontal armor can easily be penetrated by 100mm guns unlike the Centurion Mk.1 (except for the weak lower plate) and yes the 7.5 cm KwK L/70 was one of the best guns in the war but it didn't have enough penetration to destroy heavy tanks such as the IS-2 Mod. 1944's frontal plate. The gunner also didn't have his own independent sight only having the gunner's sight and the commander can't turn the turret which means it takes longer to point the gun at a target than say an M4A3E8 Easy Eight Sherman. Plus there were alot of reliable issues with the Panther due to its very short development period which all tanks have (Pershings also had reliability issues since many were rushed to put into service in the late war but the 76mm Sherman is by far better than the early pershings in numbers and reliability). The panther also didn't have a stablizer to help it fire on the move or atleast make it fire much more easier so it isn't perfect. At first sight it looks like it has the perfect stats between firepower, armor, and speed. But it isnt and thus the Centurion Mk.1 is the true first Main Battle tank (PLUS the panther was designated as a medium tank and cannot do most tasks that MBTs do while the Centurion Mk.1 is designated as an MBT)

@Cody Sonnet False, the IS-7 was created to defeat the Jagdtiger's 12.8 cm Pak 44, plus the IS-3's armor is 200mm frontally (without the angle taken into account) while the KwK 42's gun can only penetrate at around 185mm at 100 meters with the Pzgr 39/42 APCBC Shell. The Pzgr. 40/42 APCR Shell can only penetrate 200mm from 100 meters to 750 meters as the penetration value for the Pzgr. 40/42 APCR shell loses at 1000 meters with only 199mm of penetrating power (Also remember that we're only talking about the raw armor of the IS-3 aka the 200mm, NOT INCLUDING THE INCREASE IN ARMOR BECAUSE OF THE ANGLE AND THE CHANCES OF BOUNCES). And you still haven't given me a proper reason on why the Panther is an MBT. It is classified as a Medium tank. Also! The intial design for the Panther called for stats within 30 tonnes (aka the tank's transmissions and drive sprockets are made for a 30 ton tank) but due to it being up armored in later varients and the design produce was heavier. More stress was given to the transmission. The weight of the Panther is now 45 Tonnes (production). There were also incidents of the engine not being powerful enough to carry the entire weight of the Panther. The Panther is only superior to a 1v1 against a T-34/85 due to its superior gun range but looking at reality there were more T-34/85s than Panthers. Its like asking if the T-14 Armata was better than the M1A1, and M1A2 Abrams. On a 1v1 its overall superior BUT looking at reality the M1A1 and M1A2 would swarm the T-14 Armatas You people only look at the stats ON PAPER without looking on what the Panther's run was in reality. Plus the Tiger I was overall more reliable than the Panther due to having a much longer development time but the tiger I still had many problems during its service life. Also the IS-2M doesn't exist, it can only be found in the game called World of Tanks which I am guessing you got all your date from. This is the REAL WORLD not a video game. World of tanks isn't even a realistic game (played it before) and the IS-2M is literally a copy paste of the IS-4M that actually existed. Next time please do your own research before replying :)))))

Nice channel.

It's one of the royalty free neon sound effects which you can find on RU-vid. However I've cut and rearranged it to match the glow of the sign.

@@NightShiftScaleModels In the Audio Library? :o Can't find it :p

Yes, Soviet tanks from Iraq during Desert Storm would be great. The battle of 73 Easting or the Highway of Death are great sources for this, as is the current debacle in Ukraine. Or, he could do WW2 to Modern T-34/85s in pretty much any conflict they were involved in, as destroyed and burned out is kind of their natural state! LOL

U should be a RU-vidr.y our name is to perfect for a NO.

like at 20:58? there are some vape/coil build tutorials for making twisted coil wire that might help a good bit

It's very easy - just take a long piece of thin wire, like 0,3mm, bend it in half, put a toothpick between the bend (this will be your handle), and put the other loose end into a rotary tool or AC hand drill. Turn it on, and it'll twist the wire into a simple rope which looks like a rebar. That's it :) With that being said, I plan on making another rebar tank!

@@NightShiftScaleModels Wow, thanks for the reply first of all. I really have to try this out. I'm also a huge fan of fury road. After seing this video I think I might just go all out and build a tank completely in mad max style. I'm thinking about makeshift steel plate armor, rebar cages, spikes, sandbags, barbwire, etc.

Great video! Been lookin around how you made the Objekt 279 aluminum leading edges. Can you make a little instructional? Thanks!