These Pesky Web Designers Have Done It Again... 

hey, you have insta or something I have a few questions

@@sebasbarrantes5727 ?>????????????????????

It’s definitely a spam bot 100%

I've been one for 2 decades and I don't need to keep watching this video.

I've been a frontend dev for 23 years. You'll get used to learning the new "best ways" to do everything over time. (it never ends)

writing css can sometimes be blissfull

@classic max Yeah, for sure. It's a nice UI in artistic terms and even works well in terms of interactivity but it definitely breaks conventions and will confuse the majority of people who expect things to work in a particular way. Though I guess the target demographic of this particular website isn't really going to be the none tech-savvy crowd.

@classic max not every client has the same audience, and your dad probably isn't the target group for this website. you might wanna think about whether your rule of thumb really applies in any situation. We would still be living in caves and hunt deer with bamboo sticks, if everyone would think like you and nobody would challenge conventions.

Cap

@@chonkydog6262 He got 112K subs in the last 30 days

@@Harmxn So? He makes bad content.

@@chonkydog6262 165k people would disagree

@@chonkydog6262 Meme videos with 90 views are much better I know

Usually he makes websites soulless and corporate but yeah, he does design well and his videos look interesting

I absolutely agree he will blow up

i mean 163k is massive already but i know he'll have millions in a year.

@@UncleEdu I can see how it might not be for everyone, but for visual and tidy freaks like me I usually prefer his take on the designs. Although I get the sentiment of the websites having their own 'soul'

@@odriden1696 I like his designs, ofcourse, but when he changed the steam's website per example, he make it look more corporate, soulless, and focusing on money instead of actual design. Simple old design doesnt always mean bad.

😂😂😂😂😂 on point

Same, I love how he breaks everything down - and so simply and smoothly too. Like that beautiful transition

You can set the nav toggle to have an aria-label to tell screen readers that it is the navigation menu. Then you can set the project links within the hidden nav menu to be tabindex="0" by default so that a user can't tab through them, but when the nav toggle is clicked have some JS that sets all of the links to be tabindex="1" so that you can now tab through them.

That why i loathe modern web design. Everybody wants to be unique and good looking. But they do that loosing function. And due to their oversimplification i often times need to search longer then neccesary just to find what i clicked for. Furthermore are websites like the one in this video more recource intencive and therefor laggy on older mashienes. Just because it looks buttery smooth on the newest Macbook doesnt mean it will look good on a 2005 Dell pc. You cant expect every customer/visitor to have modern computers.

@@aweloop6248 so what you are saying is old devices should always be taken into accounts? Huh tell that to apple. There has to be a reason to want to migrate to the newer machines otherwise the new ones would just be overkill if your 2005 dell computer or the first iphone could run everything smoothly

@@aweloop6248 You'd have to lazyload the content to prevent massive load times, but yes I agree, newer designs tend to steer further and further away from being functional. If I'm having to hunt for elements/information, then you've already failed as a designer, and you're quite right about perfomance. Having a bunch of css3 properties (animations, scaling, transforms, zooms etc..) will be visibly slower on older machines, if they can even render those properties correctly. Imagine trying to run a site like this on IE. Good luck is all I can say.

@@aweloop6248 "unique" is a bad word here, it contradicts with oversimplification

@@fancieme1359 Most of the world doesn't have high speed internet or unlimited bandwidth. These are not accessible to them. And yes, website preformance should be considered, not everyone can afford/has access to preformant machines or high speed internet. These folks shouldn't have a terrible experince using a site. Not to mention they're hell to use and terrible for actually finding information. When I visit a site I'm seldom looking to be impressed with it's design. I'm looking for information or trying to complete a task. Designs like this will looking slick are harder to use and harder to parse.